AF-A is tested on T-50

AF-A is tested on T-50By the end of the year, flight tests of the third T-50 fighter equipped with an onboard radar station with an active phased-array antenna (AFAR) will begin. Alexey Poveschenko was told about the plans by an employee of the firm "Sukhoi". Radar with an active grid, as a part of VMIRS (highly automated multifunctional integrated electronic system) of the T-50 fighter, developed in the NIIP named after V.V.Tikhomirov. At the time of MAX 2009 and 2011, in the NIIP exposition one could see prototypes of the radar system.


During MAKS-2011, at the institute's stand, prototypes of AFAR for T-50 were tested. First for two years, then a year. In 2011, bench tests passed the third prototype of the system having AFAR. After the acceptance tests, it was installed on the third experienced T-50-3. The preparation of the third PAC sample for flight tests is now being completed in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Upon completion of the test flights of the T-50-3, it is planned that the radar station will be activated, which will start the development of the radar equipment as part of the fighter avionics. NIIP developers do not hide the difficulties that have to be overcome during the creation of the radar with AFAR using domestic electronic component base. Mastering the production base is difficult, especially in the manufacture of receiving-transmitting modules.

It is necessary to add that VMIRS fighter has five radar posts. In development and testing, priority is given to the front phased antenna array and its integration with the rest of the onboard systems. The radar with AFAR many new modes of operation, which in domestic practice will be used for the first time.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. KuigoroZHIK 20 November 2011 16: 15 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    moving forward is good
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 20 November 2011 17: 03 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation has developed a new missile for the promising Russian T-50 fighter (PAK FA). About this, as reported by Interfax, said the general director and general designer of the corporation Boris Obnosov. “This is a truly unique product with an interception range of up to 200 kilometers. I don’t know analogues with such characteristics either among Europeans or Americans,” he said. It is expected that in 2011 the TRV will launch a test batch of missiles, and in 2012 their mass production will begin.
      1. KuigoroZHIK 20 November 2011 17: 13 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        another good news. That would have her TTX, at least approximate, to find out ...
        1. urzul 21 November 2011 09: 49 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Yeah, right now on Wikipedia you will post wink
      2. Surg 20 November 2011 17: 45 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        The main thing is that at the end of all the tests they do not say that the aircraft is very expensive to manufacture and we will modernize the old dryers.
    2. Vadivak 20 November 2011 17: 45 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      The IUFM fighter has five radar posts.


      In 2002, the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “State Ryazan Instrument Plant” in conjunction with the Scientific Research Institute of Instrument Making named after V.V. Tikhomirova ”a tender was won for the development and production of an SUV with an active phased antenna array (AFAR) of the product Sh-121 of the T-50 facility. FSUE GRPZ was identified as the manufacturer of the Sh-121 product, which includes:

      product Н036 - front-view antenna system (Н036-1-01);

      L-band antenna system (Н036L-1-01);

      Antenna systems for side viewing (Н036Б - 1 - 01Л and -01Б).

      The range is centimeter, there is no radar station behind the post yet (as far as I know)
  2. maksim 20 November 2011 16: 23 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    At present, in such areas it is necessary to go by leaps and bounds and invest more money in the defense industry and not in elections, the results of which have long been known
    1. sedoj 20 November 2011 16: 40 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      There is money - there are not enough brains. I mean those who left for Israel and the USA.
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        Alexey Prikazchikov 21 November 2011 10: 02 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Let’s let them fall and without you we’ll figure it out before we lived normo and live happily ever after.
    2. urzul 21 November 2011 09: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What are you doing now ??
  3. dred
    dred 20 November 2011 16: 54 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    The plane is handsome.
    1. Anatoly
      Anatoly 20 November 2011 17: 03 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Our military equipment, even from an aesthetic point of view, is more pleasing to the eye than western. Although a special design is not developed. Rather, the optimal combination of form and function.
  4. red 11
    red 11 20 November 2011 17: 00 New
    • -9
    • 0
    -9
    Further development of the MiG 1.44
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 20 November 2011 17: 02 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      MiG 1.44 is a slightly different machine in a flash and all the same different schools.
      1. red 11
        red 11 20 November 2011 17: 10 New
        • -4
        • 0
        -4
        When creating the t-50, it was primarily MiG 1.44 that was developed
        Under the USSR, there was a competition between YAK SU and MiG
        In the current economic situation, the state is not able to allocate money to each company
        Therefore, they gathered the basics and embodied them in the t-50
        1. Alexey Prikazchikov
          Alexey Prikazchikov 20 November 2011 17: 48 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          But in Pak Fa, it’s true that everything is different avionics glider materials engines everything else no
    2. urzul 21 November 2011 09: 50 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Which profile is interesting! ??! belay
  5. Alexey Prikazchikov
    Alexey Prikazchikov 20 November 2011 17: 02 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Oh my God, it’s flooded, but let’s let the fleet of aviation go on like that, and this is our fist. They need the most money without Russia.
  6. Bob
    Bob 20 November 2011 17: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A handsome airplane claims to become - SUPER.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 20 November 2011 17: 47 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Yes, I agree, and most importantly, the characteristics are at the level and not expensive compared to the same f 35 and raptor кар оче по по наш наш наш наш наш наш наш наш наш наш наш наш.
      1. Pavel V
        Pavel V 20 November 2011 20: 56 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        The main thing, as noted above (
        Surg Today, 17:45) - do not ... what they did.
  7. Sergh
    Sergh 20 November 2011 18: 22 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    LINE NEWS

    An integral indicator of the innovation activity of any company is the pace of product renewal and its competitiveness against the background of the world's best analogues. If over the past two decades, Tactical missile armament enterprises produced new or upgraded models in units, now they are preparing to launch the new 15 production of high-precision weapons (WTO). In particular, the entire range of aviation SD is being updated.

    In the class of export air-surface "air – surface" are created:

    - in a series of general purposes (multi-purpose):

    a) missiles of type X-38МЭ (development of the parent company). The modular principle of execution assumes the possibility of equipping with various combined guidance systems, including an inertial system and variants of final precision guidance on the basis of GPS, laser, thermal imaging, radar type or satellite navigation;

    b) the Ovod-ME rocket weapon complex with the X-59М2Е SD (Raduga GosMCB) is capable of hitting ground and surface targets, recognized by the operator on the multifunctional indicator. The complex can be used around the clock and in conditions of limited visibility;

    c) X-59MK2 rocket (Raduga GosMKB) with an optical-electronic correction and end-guidance system designed to hit a wide range of ground targets with known coordinates of a location, including non-radio-emitting and not having radar, infrared and optical contrast to the surrounding background.

    - in a number of specialized (by types of goals) SD:

    a) anti-radar UR:

    - X-31PD (parent company);

    - X-58USHKE (GosMKB "Rainbow").

    Both missiles are equipped with wide-range passive radar homing heads, as well as a navigation and automatic control system based on a strap-shaped navigation system (SINS). Significantly improved a number of performance characteristics (guidance accuracy, range of use, the effectiveness of combat units, etc.);

    b) anti-ship airborne anti-aircraft missiles:

    - high-speed X-31AD with an improved ramjet engine (parent company);

    - low altitude (flight height at the final section - 4 m) X-35UE (parent company) - further development of the well-proven X-35E aviation missile.

    - X-59MK - a long-range missile (GosMKB "Rainbow") for hitting a wide range of surface radar-contrast targets with an effective reflective surface (EOC) of 300 sq. m (including targets of the "cruiser" type) on the principle of "let it go - forget it" at any time of the day in any weather conditions. Adapted to all Russian front-line aircraft.

    New developments (GNNP "Region") adjustable bombs include:

    - KAB-500S-E with satellite guidance equipment and a high-explosive warhead to hit targets with previously known coordinates that are entered to the discharge zone. Correction by signals of the navigation system from the carrier is possible. The accuracy of the hit is 7–2 meters, the discharge height is 500–5000 m. It works on the principle of “dropped - forgot” and can be used at any time of the day or in any weather.

    - KAB-1500LG-F-E with a high-explosive warhead and semi-active laser gyro-stabilized homing system for hitting stationary ground and surface targets such as railway and highway bridges, military-industrial facilities, ships, strong points, including those hidden in the terrain. They are used alone or in one gulp from front-line aircraft equipped with a laser target illumination system or simple collimator sights for issuing preliminary target designation (when using a ground-based illuminator). The guidance accuracy is 4–7 meters, the discharge height is 1000–8000 km.

    In the class of export air "air-air" are created ("GosMKB" Vympel "):

    - Short-range missiles and short-range highly maneuverable air combat RVV-MD for arming modern and promising fighters, attack aircraft and combat helicopters. Compared with the previous version (R-73E), the range of application, maneuverability characteristics, target designation angles are increased, and noise immunity (including from optical interference) is increased. The missile guidance system includes an all-aspect passive infrared homing (dual-band IHS) with combined aerodynamic control;

    - medium-range missiles RVV-SD for armament of modern and promising fighters. With a launch range of up to 110 km, it is capable of hitting targets with an overload of up to 12 g at any time of the day, from all angles, in REP conditions, against the backdrop of land and water surfaces, including with multi-channel firing on the principle of "let go - forget." Missile guidance system - inertial with radio correction and active radar homing;

    - UR long-range RVV-DB. First demonstrated at MAKS 2011. Compared with the previous long-range missile R-33E, the new missile has significantly improved characteristics. The high aerodynamic properties of the RVV-BD rocket and the use of a dual-mode solid propellant rocket engine with a starting weight of up to 510 kg allow for a launch range of up to 200 km (for R-33E - 120 km) and the ability to hit targets with an overload of 8 g (for R-33E - 4 g) at altitudes from 15 m to 25 km.

    It should be noted that, despite the fact that some of the above developments retain the names of previous products, these are practically new WTO models. All of them are made at a new engineering level, based on the widespread use of digital technologies, the latest principles and guidance systems, which significantly expanded the combat
    More details: http://nvo.ng.ru/armament/2011-08-26/10_breakthru.html
  8. patriot64
    patriot64 20 November 2011 18: 28 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    SERGH, you, I see, are pros in military technology. In order to increase my education, do not tell me how planes are taught to fly? Thank you in advance.
    1. red 11
      red 11 20 November 2011 18: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It all pleases of course. But will not these technologies leave the country?
      1. urzul 21 November 2011 09: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        with their feet straight to America, not at that time already
    2. Sergh
      Sergh 20 November 2011 18: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Ha, patriot64Well, YOU are a specific comrade. I don’t even understand, the question is dead end, is this a joke or where?
      Well, just don’t tell anyone, secret! Here is a little useful.

      http://zenithair.com/stolch750/index.html
      1. Pavel V
        Pavel V 20 November 2011 21: 02 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        red 11 Today, 18:33
        It all pleases of course. But will not these technologies leave the country?


        Sergh Today, 18:44
        Ha, patriot64, well, YOU are a specific comrade. I don’t even understand, the question is dead end, is this a joke or where?
        Well, just don’t tell anyone, secret!

        Thanks to the participants. Cheered up. And then you read some comments and feel - "Darkness is coming."
  9. patriot64
    patriot64 20 November 2011 20: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Why a joke? We teach our experimental machines according to a certain algorithm. It is possible to compose a program, write it to the controller, but then it is impossible to take into account all errors and deviations from the parameters. You can manually run each action first, then simply write the actions to the controller, then things will go faster and more reliable. In order not to go beyond the parameters, a bunch of corrections are applied, then the machine does not get up, performing an unnecessary action, and according to the data recorded in memory, corrects the error on the go. In the end, even a tricked out plane without a pilot and his experience is just a pile of iron. To automate all systems and the outputs of their emergencies perhaps also produce similar actions?
  10. Roman Patriot
    Roman Patriot 20 November 2011 21: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Oh your mother!
    Straight mood has risen!
    Come on Russia, get up!
  11. ESCANDER
    ESCANDER 20 November 2011 22: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Cho is dvigl silent.
    Who is the thread in the know, huh?
    1. red 11
      red 11 20 November 2011 22: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      On the prototype T-50, as well as on the first production samples, which should go into service with the Russian Air Force in 2015, the engines of the first stage - “AL-41F1” (Item 117) were installed. This is an aviation turbojet dual-circuit engine with an afterburner and a controlled thrust vector, created by NPO Saturn by order of Sukhoi Design Bureau, which meets all the engine requirements for a fifth-generation fighter, including the ability to develop supersonic speed without using afterburner, and It has a fully digital control system and a plasma ignition system. The engine of the second stage will be developed within 10-12 years
      1. Tjumenec72
        Tjumenec72 20 November 2011 23: 11 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        yes, the engines are far behind (
        ... what kind of nozzle will he have?
        1. red 11
          red 11 20 November 2011 23: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          What do you mean behind ???????
          "AL-41F1" (Product 117) The best in the world and there are no analogues.
          1. Tjumenec72
            Tjumenec72 21 November 2011 07: 57 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Well, it’s you, my friend, who bent. I am also a patriot (in the good sense of the word), but you have to be realistic.
            Here are the dry facts:
            Pratt & Whitney F135 (F-35) further development of the F119 (F-22) traction 12460 kgf !!! afterburner 18100 kgf
            "Product 117" (T-50 1 stage) traction 8800 kgs afterburner 15000 kgs
            "Product 129" (T-50 2 stage) traction 10700 kgs afterburner 17600 kgs
            In 10 years we will make the engine weaker than the existing F135. As our engine operators say - it’s pointless to catch up, you need a breakthrough!
            1. urzul 21 November 2011 09: 57 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              You just forgot to specify the dimensions; in the same F-22, two Pratt & Whitney F135 (F-35) engines will not fit.
              P79B-300 (Yak-141) maximum traction in 10977 kgf on the afterburner mode.
              What are we inventing the bike ??? they will not make a flat nozzle, as this will reduce the maneuverability of the aircraft
              1. Tjumenec72
                Tjumenec72 21 November 2011 11: 46 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I agree, it is necessary to look at the ratio, the thrust-weight ratio, that is (but still lagging behind, and this is not my opinion).
                and the nozzle - depending on how to do it) it’s not in vain that such “developed” aerodynamic controls made engines at an angle
                the nozzle can be flat (or something like that) the operating time for it is
                1. urzul 21 November 2011 12: 59 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  under our aircraft will go, the main ratio of mass and power. and flat nozzles reduce horizontal maneuverability, this has already been considered and they have refused it.
                  even the 117 product is superior to Pratt & Whitney F119 in Specific Traction: 10,87 kgf / kg vs 8,94 kgf / kg
                  so who else does not know how to build engines. And the mass of two engines is lower on the 800 KG, and this is a very big hplus in aviation
    2. Sergh
      Sergh 20 November 2011 22: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      "Product 117C"

      “Product 129” (a second stage jet engine) for PAK FA will be created ahead of schedule

      The creation of the second stage jet engine (“Product 129”) for the promising T-50 fighter (PAK FA) is ahead of schedule. According to ITAR-TASS, the managing director of NPO Saturn Ilya Fedorov said. According to him, the completion of development work and the delivery of the first engines to the Russian Ministry of Defense are currently planned for 2015, when the first T-50 fighters should begin to enter service.

      “Now the units of NPO Saturn and interacting structures are working on a preliminary design of the engine. Everything is agreed. Work is underway in Moscow, Rybinsk and other sites. We have a firm belief that the second-stage engine will be done sooner than everyone expects, ”Fedorov said, noting that“ it is economically unprofitable to stretch the development time and continue to produce the first-stage engine ”.

      It should be noted that a less powerful version of the AL-35F41 - AL-1F41S engine (“Product 1C”) will be installed on Su-117S fighters. It differs from its “older” version by an outdated digital engine control system and traction reduced by almost five kilonewtons.

      The engine of the second stage - “Product 129” - will be installed on later batches of PAK FA. Not much is known about the new power plant. Earlier it was reported that “Product 129” will differ from AL-41F1 in increased traction, as well as higher fuel efficiency. Presumably, the second stage engine will be able to develop thrust of 107 kilonewtons in cruising flight mode and 176 kilonewtons in afterburner mode. In addition, the overhaul life is likely to be significantly increased.
      1. ESCANDER
        ESCANDER 20 November 2011 23: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Thanks for the fresh guys.
        1. Sergh
          Sergh 20 November 2011 23: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Evgeny Marchukov, general designer and director of the A.I. Lyulka Scientific and Technical Center, a branch of the NPO Saturn Joint-Stock Engine Corporation.

          http://vpk-news.ru/articles/8228
          1. red 11
            red 11 20 November 2011 23: 27 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            hello to him winked
            joke
  12. nnz226 21 November 2011 01: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    more planes are good and different! Especially the 5 generation!
  13. Commoner
    Commoner 21 November 2011 09: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.

    That seems to be true. Apparently the last 20 years of stagnation are affecting. Now really, we need brains, as one of the commentators said. Or rather minds. And minds are those that would not only work for money, but look for those now - military-patriotic education for those same 20 years was also at the level of life safety in the school curriculum ...
    Perhaps Skolkovo will someday begin to solve the problems of the shortage of modern electronics, but Zelenograd should not be forgotten.
    No matter how difficult it is, but these difficulties can be overcome, I’m sure if we want to live in a strong, self-respecting state!