In February, 2016 in the United States will begin testing anti-submarine ship capable of operating without crew

According to US media reports, the first unmanned anti-submarine ship will begin testing in 2016 in the United States. Information portal Vice referenced TASS, reports that we are talking about a ship that can operate without a crew - in automatic mode. The resource writes that the first test events are scheduled for February next year and will be held in the state of California.

The American anti-submarine ship, which, according to the American media, is capable of operating without a crew, is approximately 40 meters long. The work to create this naval drone was commissioned by DARPA, the Advanced Research Programs Directorate of the United States military. The main work was done by Leidos specialists.

The working name of the anti-submarine ship is ACTUCV. The abbreviation in Russian stands for "Automatic vessel for continuous anti-submarine surveillance." The name suggests that the ship should not be used directly to destroy submarines, although the developers say that the ACTUCV does have the function of carrying certain weapons.

Representatives of the company "Leidos" report that their anti-submarine brainchild will be significantly cheaper than maintaining, for example, a destroyer. If the average destroyer from the US budget is allocated up to 0,7 million dollars daily, then no more than 15 thousand dollars can be allocated for the ACTUCV.

On the effectiveness of the detection and likely destruction of submarines, the developers of ACTUCV do not yet apply.

Comments

[Mikhail Krapivin]

Nude Nude. Given the effectiveness of our electronic warfare equipment ... Nu-nu ... Even on our command, he will float to Vladivostok, give up :)

[bulvas]

And fixed unmanned launchers lying at the bottom, he will also be able to
to discover?

[satelit24]

do they even exist? Or have you watched the "Military Secret" program?

[crazyrom]

Well, the tests will begin, well, they are trying, they admit that they are useless. Even the ships they put into service are worthless, the construction of Zumwalts is stopped at 3 copies. And before, when he was tested, what did they think? So it will be with this, or they will immediately reject it, or they will drink the budget and then reject it.

[oldseaman1957]

Quote: Mikhail Krapivin

Given the effectiveness of our EW facilities ... Nu-nu ...

- They still do not take into account this factor. (Inertia of thought ...)

[severniy]

As I understand it, what would there be nobody to write reports?

[dr.Bo]

Here comes a new round of technology, an arms race.
I think we also have developments not inferior to pin.dossky.

[Mhpv]

why spend on this toy with a remote control. A fishing net left on its course will put this miracle out of action before technical assistance arrives, there’s no crew, immediately its maintenance costs will increase, and the costs of incapacitating it are cheap.

[Gani]

and the cost of disabling it penny

- well, you can drop a light drone from a slingshot and a tank is more expensive than an RPG shot by many orders of magnitude
the question here is: will he be able, with his active echolocation, to carry out the tasks for which he is under construction? if so, he will not be alone and there is someone to remove the network from them.

[Mhpv]

Comedian, first carefully read the title of the article and the article:

we are talking about a ship that can operate without a crew - in automatic mode

On naval ships, in addition to navigational instruments, they keep watch on the bridge as a signalman and his assistant, who conduct visual control.
And so for your overall development:

24 April, / SEAFARERS JOURNAL /. On the Yangtsi River (China), the Dutch ship "Swift" wrapped a net on a screw, odin.tc.
The incident occurred at the exit of Nanbu County.
The rescue operation, organized by local authorities, lasted 4 days, during which they cleaned the screw.

publication time: October 11 2015, 18: 37
last updated: October 11 2015, 19: 47
blog print save mail photo

Russian rescue divers successfully carried out an operation to free the propeller of the Norwegian tanker "Norvarg" from the coiled net
Russian rescue divers successfully carried out an operation to free the propeller of the Norwegian tanker "Norvarg" from the coiled net. An emergency in the Barents Sea happened on October 7, it took several days to tow the vessel to the port. On board the tanker there are mostly Russian crew.

On Sunday, Anatoly Leontyev, head of the Northern Expeditionary Squad of Rescue Operations of the Federal Agency for Fishery, told TASS that it took the divers about two hours to release the propellers. This was done at the Norwegian port of Botsfjord in the Barents Sea, where the tanker brought the rescue tug Purga.
Now the Purga rescuer is heading for Murmansk. After checking the main engine, the Norwegian tanker will continue its work.
The Norwegian tanker was left idle in the economic zone of the Barents Sea on the evening of October 7. Nets were wound around his screw. After receiving the distress signal, the rescue vessel "Purga" headed for him. The towing operation was carried out in a storm of seven points, a wind of 20 meters per second and in the dark.
The distance from the place of emergency to the coast of Norway was about 200 miles. Towing took about two days. The Norwegian tanker was delivered by Russian tug to the Varanger Fjord that night according to the schedule, but due to the strong current, the Norwegian pilot recommended another port - Botsfjord.

And so on.

[Gani]

This is an autonomous sonar, it will not be tasked with a secretive transatlantic independent transition and there will probably be one support vessel for several of these, as long as it is a prototype research platform, and on serial ones they will find a way to get rid of most of the identified shortcomings. the network is wound up - we remove the screw, put water cannons, well, etc. And then here in the general opinion, all military R&D in the states and any new products are exceptional crap for cutting dough
P.S. I’m caught, let’s say such a bot to our submariners, well, I’m not confused yet, or they have already untangled it in the state authorities, it is noisy with sonars, it is hysterical in the radio range, and what should they do? The network to try to put it at the rate or be washed away

[NIKNN]

The matter is generally promising. Sonars are improving, the algorithms of their work, too, well, the anti-rab (noise immunity) and much more. In fact, even if you notice that this "cheap" (although they do not have this) a drone is being influenced, then in this area, with a very high probability, it is necessary to use more serious forces and means.
But with autonomy what? What kind of power plant should stand? Today, an acceptable option is nuclear, because it’s obviously not enough to ensure the operation and operation of the battery equipment, it’s necessary to service the internal combustion people ..., that’s the question of price, and safety also arises.
One can’t believe that the Yankees coped with the surrendered problem. If so then a very serious application.
Something like this.

[demon1978]

I hope our programmers have already had a hand in the software of this "miracle" ??? !!!

[Mama_Cholli]

If only all these drones didn't go mad at one "perfect moment" ...

[MolGro]

it’s not enough for them that in the Crimea their drones put them))

[arane]

Damn, you have to save Sarah Connor!

[kil 31]

Let's see what happens. In "Children's World" there are a lot of them, they swim in the fountains.

[Mama_Cholli]

Quote: arane

Damn, you have to save Sarah Connor!

Sarah herself will leave for Israel if something happens ...

[the most important]

Quote: Mikhail Krapivin

Nude Nude. Given the effectiveness of our electronic warfare equipment ... Nu-nu ... Even on our command, he will float to Vladivostok, give up :)

On the route: California - North Pole - Vladivostok ...

[satelit24]

James Cameron said that the terminator is not just a film, but a warning film! (As one of the options for the future )

[Lenin]

[quote = satelit24] James Cameron said that the terminator is not just a film, but a warning film! (as one of the options for the future )
What is Cameron ... Our compatriot Isaac Aizimov warned about this.

[roskot]

I read about the "Flying Dutchman" as a child. So the Americans are not the first here.

[kebeskin]

Since then, a year has passed. An American unmanned submarine still found a Russian submarine. But she agreed not to transfer information to the apparatus on an American base.

[fa2998]

Quote: bulvas

And fixed unmanned launchers lying at the bottom, he will also be able to
to discover?

I, that lagged behind life. Was there an international treaty on not placing weapons in space and on the ocean floor! Or canceled?

[bulvas]

Quote: fa2998

Quote: bulvas

And fixed unmanned launchers lying at the bottom, he will also be able to
to discover?

I, that lagged behind life. Was there an international treaty on not placing weapons in space and on the ocean floor! Or canceled?

She will swim to another position once a week, it’s just an unmanned submarine

[Aleksandr69]

The financiers are like ours: did they take into account only the fuel and spare parts for the maintenance of the ship? and the state on the coast, which should monitor and maintain the combat effectiveness of this ship? It will turn out almost a crew, only on the shore ...

[Taygerus]

for each robot and us there is a soldering iron

[guzik007]

She is unmanned. The Yankees know that if they fall into our hands, they’ll tear the whole cap on the flags, so they leave the cap in the port)))

[Yugra]

And what’s our electronic warfare? We’ll intercept this device and make it work for ourselves. We will land five drones at a time in Syria, and here we can ...

[Corsair0304]

For all the comic nature (irony and causticity) of the above comments, you need to be aware that the Americans first drones appeared, with the help of which they coolly cut budget expenses + perform all sorts of different delicate operations.
It may well turn out that something will work out in the maritime direction of the states. With all my dislike for this country and its politicians, it would be foolish to consider them short-sighted and unreasonable.

[veksha50]

"On the topic of detection efficiency and probable damage submarines developers ACTUCV are not yet distributed "...

Hmm ... As well as this drone, in what water area it will (can) operate, with what radius of action ... Well, nobody canceled typhoon storms ... And many other things ...

It seems to me that the loot is swelling, but the result will be far from predicted in terms of efficiency ...

Well, wait and see -

[mav1971]

Quote: veksha50

Leidos

Quote: veksha50

"On the topic of detection efficiency and probable damage submarines developers ACTUCV are not yet distributed "...

Hmm ... As well as this drone, in what water area it will (can) operate, with what radius of action ... Well, nobody canceled typhoon storms ... And many other things ...

It seems to me that the loot is swelling, but the result will be far from predicted in terms of efficiency ...

Well, wait and see -

there was info about them in the 2013 year here.
http://topwar.ru/23060-actuv-bespilotnyy-robot-ohotnik-dlya-obnaruzheniya-podlod
ok.html

quote:
"The program for the creation of ACTUV includes 4 stages. In August 2012, the completion of the 1st stage of the program was announced (at this stage, the feasibility of its implementation was determined, as well as other assessment activities were carried out). Preliminary work schedule for the 2nd and 3rd -th stage is about 36 months, the 4th final stage is given another 18 months. Accordingly, we are talking about the stages of development, construction and demonstration tests of an experimental model of a robot-boat. "


and there were also words about cutting, about "they will do a lot of years." But then 4 years have passed and the tests are beginning.
The control and maneuvering system for independent movement on the high seas according to international rules has already been developed. On the model, 4 times smaller.
By the way, the system is defense.
There are no weapons on it.
Destroying an unarmed ship in peacetime in neutral waters, albeit a deserted one - you won’t get scandal.
Its task is to find the boat, to identify, to pursue it constantly, until it leaves or until the warship approaches.
Transferring information in real-time is the main task!
The enemy will be sure to know that he is detected. This is also the main task. The adversary must know that they are leading him.
Perhaps there will even be a transmission to open channels of radio communication about the submarine, its identification, location, course, depth, speed for a greater effect.
And any civilian ship, any amateur radio - will know about it.
Discovered - horseradish wash off later. The propaganda effect will be transcendental.

[Denis DV]

Wonderful, but will they distinguish their submarines from strangers? There are years of work on 30, I think, to get the first intelligible sample

[mav1971]

Quote: Denis DV

Wonderful, but will they distinguish their submarines from strangers? There are years of work on 30, I think, to get the first intelligible sample

Boats are not that theirs from strangers differ at the expense of times.
Boats of the same sub-series of Elk, and even that differ also at the expense of times.
For 4 years, they went from concept development to field tests.
what the fuck 30 years ...

[pts-m]

and if there is a hole in the board during a swoop on a mine, what will the Yankees do? rather, out of habit, they will finish and brushing off their paws they will say ... well, who doesn’t happen ...

[mav1971]

Quote: PTS-m

and if there is a hole in the board during a swoop on a mine, what will the Yankees do? rather, out of habit, they will finish and brushing off their paws they will say ... well, who doesn’t happen ...

Have you seen many mines along the east or west coast of the USA?

Just do not say that they will appear ...
Do not carry nonsense.

[cap]

OPERATION "STAR WARS" AGAIN IN THE HOPE THAT WILL WORK AS WITH THE USSR. SUPPLIED TOGETHER WITH SANCTIONS AND THE FALL OF OIL PRICES.
If I could come up with a fresh one BLYUDO.POSLEDNYAYA NEW cauliflower in Georgian, AND THAT IN ODESSA KISNET.POHOZHE THAN AMERICANS hot dog MKDONALDSA AND DOES NOT boast MOGUT.A Dreadnought RADIOUPRALYAEMOMU WHOLE BODY WILL SENSORS hung so that the operator could be seen where it says "CALIBER" ITS stoke Arrived ...

[Prisoner]

Looks like the personnel ready to fight against a serious army is not crowded with the star-half-haired.

[Gunther]

The name suggests that the ship should not be used directly to destroy submarines ...

Mattresses are afraid, and it is reasonable that the electronic mind (hackers there are Chinese, or something else) will get out of control and begin to water its own.

[rudolff]

A sort of large reusable self-propelled sonar buoy with its own HAK / GAS and the ability to remote control. Why not.

[gladysheff2010]

We’ll bring a flock of flying monkeys to the adversary, or we will use kamikaze crocodiles. It’s really bad in the states with human material, they get dumb not by the day, but by the clock. A flying stone can be stopped not only by hitting it in the head.

[guzik007]

Non-robotic sticky fish with 10 kg of TNT.

[chunga-changa]

Not bad. The nuclear submarine, in general, is our only truly reliable and formidable weapon, both against the main strike force of the Americans - the AUG, and as carriers of nuclear weapons. We are developing anti-aircraft defense, Americans are submarine search facilities.

[cap]

SEE THIS IN YUNOM TECHNOLOGY FOR 1968.
EXACTLY IDEA STORED.

[tinibar]

Quote: bulvas

And fixed unmanned launchers lying at the bottom, he will also be able to
to discover?

Easy! Even if they are not there!

[igorka357]

Amerikosy ... more more than a child prodigy and dough in them !!!

[mav1971]

Quote: igorka357

Amerikosy ... more more than a child prodigy and dough in them !!!

These "prodigies", when deployed in sufficient numbers, will drive our nuclear submarines away from US Navy bases by at least 1000-2000 miles.
And finding Ohio out and escorting, the task is extremely difficult, but here it becomes almost impossible.

Looking at how the boats of the USA are hosted almost in the Kola Bay, we need to have the same types of protection.