The deployment of American Patriot complexes in Japan is completed

In Japan, completed a large-scale program for the deployment of American Patriot SAM systems, reports MIC with reference to the resource "Zhongguo Xinwen Bath".




"Japan has completed the deployment of the Patriot 24-s on the 15-ti military bases throughout the country," - said in a statement.

According to the official statement of Tokyo, “Patriot air defense system is designed to repel a possible nuclear missile strike from the DPRK.”

In late October, the country's defense department reported that it had begun the final stage of the deployment of complexes on the island of Hokkaido.

The program itself on the deployment of US air defense missile systems began in 2004. The total cost of the program is not indicated, but it is noted that about $ 2006 million was spent on the purchase of complexes.

Help "MIC": “The Patriot is a long-range all-weather anti-aircraft missile system designed to destroy cruise missiles, ballistic missile warheads, as well as any type of combat aircraft. In addition to the United States, it was put into service in 13 countries, such as Greece, Israel, Spain, the Netherlands, and the Federal Republic of Germany. ”
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andrei332809 11 November 2015 12: 11 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    dzhappy from the Yankees will never get rid-protest do not protest ...
    1. Bombardier 11 November 2015 12: 14 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: andrei332809
      dzhappy from the Yankees will never get rid-protest do not protest ...

      And here is your statement, I apologize to ask. It follows from the article that Yapi just bought Patriot for his army.It happens. Many people buy for themselves, who have money and who do not have it, who nervously looks at the sky.

      But the name of the newspaper is funny - with reference to the resource "Zhongguo Xinwen Baths."- Chinese source, or what?
      1. severniy 11 November 2015 12: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The rats were rattled all the way, they didn’t want to camouflage on three covers ...
        1. Bombardier 11 November 2015 12: 30 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: severniy
          The rats were rattled all the way, they didn’t want to camouflage on three covers ...

          Three missiles have already hit the target ... along with the covers. laughing
          1. Temples 11 November 2015 12: 48 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Putin today ordered the signing of an agreement with Armenia on the creation of a unified air defense system.
            Also do not sleep.
    2. milann 11 November 2015 12: 17 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Hiroshima from Nagasaki is not enough for them. All rave about past greatness, like the Germans, and the Americans play along with them. Everything, as before, does not change anything in the world.
    3. Tor5
      Tor5 11 November 2015 12: 26 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Has the Japanese really not played enough and Hiroshima and Nagasaki haven’t taught anything? The question, of course, is rhetorical ....
      1. Buffalo 11 November 2015 12: 57 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Hiroshima and Nagasaki apparently taught the unworthy descendants of the samurai to lick shoes from the Yankees. - Plebeians!
    4. dauria 11 November 2015 12: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      japps from yankees never get rid


      The Germans, it seems, too ... Like fleas in a cat. If caught, then for a long time. laughing In addition to the Vietnamese, no one has a decent "dust"
  2. Same lech 11 November 2015 12: 13 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    According to the official statement of Tokyo, “Patriot air defense system is designed to repel a possible nuclear missile strike from the DPRK.”


    We know ... they already passed this ... near the western borders of RUSSIA they built a missile defense system from the DPRK for the same reason ... and tell me where is the logic and common sense.
    1. Voha_krim 11 November 2015 12: 36 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Quote: The same Lech
      We know ... they already passed this ... near the western borders of RUSSIA they built a missile defense system from the DPRK for the same reason ... and tell me where is the logic and common sense.

      For Patriot, our "Caliber" is too tough! And we also have Iskanders!
  3. sever.56 11 November 2015 12: 14 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    In Japan, there will soon be more land under US military bases than under cities, industrial enterprises, and land used for agriculture.
    Banzai, "independent" samurai!
  4. cniza 11 November 2015 12: 15 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    According to the official statement of Tokyo, “Patriot air defense system is designed to repel a possible nuclear missile strike from the DPRK.”




    Yes, for these purposes they will fit and then for now. Japan is a high-tech country, do you think jumping out from under the US?
  5. Wolka 11 November 2015 12: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russia will not remain in debt, we have something to pacify the spirit of the samurai
    1. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 12: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Alas sir. Without exposing the south and west of the country, without WMD we are unlikely to be able to. Japas are unsuccessful, no fear of losses, although of course the Bushido spirit is not the same as 50 years ago. But we must take into account their union agreement with the United States and South Korea.
    2. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 12: 53 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Alas sir. Without exposing the south and west of the country, without WMD we are unlikely to be able to. Japas are unsuccessful, no fear of losses, although of course the Bushido spirit is not the same as 50 years ago. But we must take into account their union agreement with the United States and South Korea.
  6. inferno_nv 11 November 2015 12: 16 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Yes, which DPRK? Everything is done and set against us, but we are not the first to start - we end and punish !!! angry
    1. Baikonur 11 November 2015 12: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Brutally punish! (film "egg of fate")
  7. Sergey-72 11 November 2015 12: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Japan will soon go into the depths of the sea, and they are all worried about defending against DPRK missiles, laughing
  8. Zolotse 11 November 2015 12: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Volka
    Russia will not remain in debt, we have something to pacify the spirit of the samurai

    And here are the samurai. After World War II, Japan is an occupied country.
  9. dchegrinec 11 November 2015 12: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The USA is actively fighting its delirium tremens! Everywhere enemies, missiles everywhere ..
  10. Corsair0304 11 November 2015 12: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Japan has completed the deployment of 24 Patriot air defense systems at 15 military bases throughout the country"
    On 15 OWN bases or American? And also: Patriots (which are Japanese) are united in a single network with Patriots, which are placed on American bases? If so, then it turns out that the Yankees sold japam to an non-export version of the Patriot, since it is nonsense to use systems of different levels of combat readiness in the same network. And separately to use them is even greater nonsense.

    By the way: "At present, according to 1997-1996, in Japan, about 94 US soldiers and officers are located at 47 bases, mainly from the Navy and Air Force. Formally, the purpose of their stay is to ensure" peace and stability "in the Far East, but in reality, maintaining military control in the Asia-Pacific region. "
    1. Bombardier 11 November 2015 12: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Corsair0304
      "Japan has completed the deployment of 24 Patriot air defense systems at 15 military bases throughout the country"
      On 15 OWN bases or American? And also: Patriots (which are Japanese) are united in a single network with Patriots, which are placed on American bases? If so, then it turns out that the Yankees sold japam to an non-export version of the Patriot, since it is nonsense to use systems of different levels of combat readiness in the same network. And separately to use them is even greater nonsense.


      At least someone read the article to the end and comprehended it ....
      1. Corsair0304 11 November 2015 12: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        In addition: The system is in no way inferior to the "Patriot"
        "Chu-SAM medium-range self-propelled anti-aircraft missile system (Type-03, Japan) is designed to destroy a wide range of aerial targets, including low-flying cruise and ballistic missiles of operational-tactical and tactical purpose, in conditions of massive raid, in difficult jamming conditions in any weather at a range of up to 50km.
        SAM Chu-SAM (Type 03) was adopted by the Japanese Self-Defense Forces in 2005.
        In November 2006, on the territory of Fort Bliss (Eng. Fort Bliss) in El Paso (Texas), training was conducted for the personnel of Japanese units for the new complex with live firing
        .

        And here, too, is Hochma: the Japanese system fired in Texas and Japanese personnel were trained there too!
        PPC, I have a brain explosion: the Americans are delivering Patriot air defense systems to japams that have their own Patriot analogue consisting of 4 cars (UVP, radar, radar control center and transport-loading machine) Type-03, but japas do not know how shoot from it and therefore learn to shoot from your air defense system in Texas!
  11. gabonskijfront 11 November 2015 12: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If you detonate a nuclear charge at the bottom of the Mariana Depression, then a tsunami rises that licks Japan along with the Patriots. The effect of a syringe or any working hydraulics when small movement on large volumes gives a gigantic but small.
    1. Bombardier 11 November 2015 12: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: gabonskijfront
      If you detonate a nuclear charge at the bottom of the Mariana Depression, then a tsunami rises that licks Japan along with the Patriots. The effect of a syringe or any working hydraulics when small movement on large volumes gives a gigantic but small.


      The terrorist act - not to give, not to take! stop
    2. glavnykarapuz 11 November 2015 13: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: gabonskijfront
      If you detonate a nuclear charge at the bottom of the Mariana Depression, then a tsunami rises that licks Japan along with the Patriots. The effect of a syringe or any working hydraulics when small movement on large volumes gives a gigantic but small.

      What kind of nonsense are you talking about "the effect of a syringe or any working hydraulics when there is little movement on large volumes"? belay
      The ocean is open, there is no closed piston or pipe. And what kind of "small movement on large volumes"? What kind of words? belay
      ".. gives a giant but small" - STA? belay
      Comrade schoolboy or student, in the classroom you had to study и master knowledgeAnd not just attend Educational establishment. Although if you are a student of humanities, then everything is already running. request
      Please, do not carry nonsense with a smart look.
      P.S. Is education reform so affected ?? If so, then I am scared for the future of my children.
  12. Mama_Cholli 11 November 2015 12: 25 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    It remains to wait for the final backfill of the South China Sea by China.
    What do they calve, I don’t understand? Each Chinese will have 2-3 wheelbarrows a month and a dam the width of a four-lane highway will rest against Japan in a couple of years ...
    1. Bombardier 11 November 2015 12: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Mama_Cholli
      It remains to wait for the final backfill of the South China Sea by China.
      What do they calve, I don’t understand? Each Chinese will have 2-3 wheelbarrows a month and a dam the width of a four-lane highway will rest against Japan in a couple of years ...

      That healthy humor went ... +
  13. Zomanus 11 November 2015 12: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As long as we don’t have a normal KR strike group in the Pacific Fleet,
    Enough of Japan and Patriots.
    But since the main threat comes from the west, then to the Pacific Fleet
    ships with Caliber will not reach soon.
    And I would not begin to count on the junk that our Marines are shooting at exercises.
    1. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 13: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Pacific Fleet was once the second most powerful fleet of the USSR. If we didn’t miss its gain as 111 years ago, then the alignment was not as lousy as it is now.
      1. glavnykarapuz 11 November 2015 13: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: amba balamut 77
        The Pacific Fleet was once the second most powerful fleet of the USSR. If we didn’t miss its gain as 111 years ago, then the alignment was not as lousy as it is now.

        I would score 111 years ago so categorically would not say. You weren’t there then and weren’t standing "with a candle nearby" - where and how can you compare what was THEN and NOW?
        I can’t say about the real state now at the Pacific Fleet, and most visitors to the site. Wrong competency. You are the commander of the Pacific Fleet OR the beginning. headquarters? If so, then you, perhaps, in the course about the state of affairs at the Pacific Fleet. After all, even very high posts - no guarantee of complete and objective information by Pacific Fleet.
        But in any case, you probably do not know the true picture of what happened at the Pacific Fleet 111 (!) Years ago. Well, you were not there. Especially in very high team positions.
        And if you start referring to historical books. So then books, their living people write. Which, like all normal people, can be mistaken, sincerely mistaken to have inaccurate data and personal motives.
        amba balamut 77please, let without frantic populism.
        P.S. I personally doubt very much that you are related to the fleet as a senior or top management.
        1. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 14: 38 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Your truth, people write books. But if these people were officers in that war, then I'm sorry this is not populism, this is the study of the history of the fatherland. How will you study it (history) if not according to eyewitnesses? If you have a time machine, lend, I will be grateful. Do not learn history, agree silly, it smells like an old rake. Regarding the capabilities of Pacific Fleet, Populiz is screaming that we are all of them, with a half kick. No offense to the warlords gentlemen, think for yourself, since 93 the ship’s composition has been decreasing, year by year, and the neighbors’ fleet is only getting stronger. You are right, I do not belong to the leadership of the fleet, but I dare to assure you that I have a maritime name having passed the old baptismal ceremony under sail, and my qualifications are not small. Varangian (which is of the type Antei) I have not only seen in the box. In a word, in the maritime business I understand much better than an ordinary Russian. Of course, I do not pretend to be the highest authority. Moreover, I will be glad to be a reinsurer in this matter. But first, please, explain to me what we contrast with the same Japanese Izumo, Congo, Korean KDX-II, KDX-III? Not only will they not find this understandable, but the main bet will again be on courage, the savvy daring of a Russian sailor. And not the steel power of ships, whose age is about 30 years. Sincerely.
          1. glavnykarapuz 11 November 2015 18: 51 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            To study history from the words of eyewitnesses?
            Did I talk about not teaching history? let's not take the subject aside, please.
            By the way, here is the answer of the historian Klim Zhukov about the history of science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqk_l55EdiE
            Look at your leisure. The historian himself will answer your question.
            Populism is not only when "we ALL break through!" but also when "we are ALL gone!" or "NOT ALL OTHERWISE."
            I meant that you are in seaworthy then it’s possible to understand and very well.
            But there is the so-called "fallacy of the participles." Let me explain what it is.
            For example, specifically yours. Here we sailed, passed the rite of baptism(?? excuse me for my perplexity that really - baptize? under sail. I only remember about the church rite and on the river in Israel) But! Did this knowledge and rituals give you access to classified information (the combat readiness of units and formations classified information) in Pacific Fleet (present time)? From this, all of the above, you began to have complete and relevant information on Pacific Fleet? ANSWER NO.
            This is the "fallacy of the sacrament" when the layman (or ordinary person as you like) it seemsthat he knows more and better than most people in some big topic, because he participated in it directly (though not in the forefront. and not even in the tenths).
            And what do you want from me, an outsider (I am not a sailor. And I’m not hiding), to clarify about some confrontations between Japanese and South Korean ships? QUESTION is clearly not at the address and not the topic.
            I’ll remind you of the topic. I critically examined your indiscriminate statement regarding "as 111 years ago, and then the alignment was not as lousy as it is now."
            You do not possess really complete and relevant information as of Pacific Fleet at the present time, not 111 years ago. Fact? Fact. But still voicing categorical conclusions.
            In addition, in the course of answering my critical remark, they tried to repeatedly mislead and divert the topic.
            It was a critical look (I think it is sometimes needed). If you want, you can be offended.
            P.S. Let me fix your Russian - be. Sorry, but I still consider such errors to be critical in the Russian language. Soon, for the New Year, we will go to the "Christmas Tree" instead of the Christmas Tree. wink
    2. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 13: 02 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      The Pacific Fleet was once the second most powerful fleet of the USSR. If we didn’t miss its gain as 111 years ago, then the alignment was not as lousy as it is now.
  14. roskot 11 November 2015 13: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Japanese only lack Petriots. So not a country, but a powder keg becomes.
  15. F.Vastag 11 November 2015 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    No one bothers Us (Russia) - Large-scale deployment of Our S-400 Complexes, Iskander, Mig-31 Interceptors and Bastion Coastal Missile Complexes (for destroying American Aircraft Carriers) in North Korea (Against Japan, South Korea and the US military and their Complexes (Patriots) at US military bases) in the Asia-Pacific region. It would be a desire (to ensure the national security of Russia in our Far East) and political will (leadership of the country). And the North Koreans, I am sure, will not be at all against (Our Complexes and ABMs) on their territory.
    1. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 14: 02 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      Slowly, very slowly we harness, unlike our neighbors. But to be friends with the guys from Juche. That’s enough for you, better with japs. laughing
      1. F.Vastag 11 November 2015 14: 28 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        To be friends with Japs - YOU ARE IN YOUR MIND ??? They (since 1945) Totally - TOTALLY LIE in a KNEE-ELBOW POSE under Amer and Do Not Rock (and They Yelp at Us about the Kuril Islands), and you are Friends with faithful lackeys and slime Americans gathered. Not better with Independent (from the States) guys from Juche. In addition, do not forget the Japanese. Always and at all times fought against us (attacking GREAT and Vile: Without a declaration of war) and in 1904 and in 1938 and 1939 (and in the Intervention of 1918-1922 in the Far East - about their atrocities against They didn’t hear anything from the Russian Civilians - read (Very “Exciting.”) No, I don’t Believe in Grams (unlike North Koreans)
        1. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 14: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Sir, it was humor, maybe bad but humor. My grandfather in the 45th to Dalyan, he also pulled his distant machine gun. In general, I do not glow with tender feelings for samurai.
        2. amba balamut 77 11 November 2015 14: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Sir, it was humor, maybe bad but humor. My grandfather in the 45th to Dalyan, he also pulled his distant machine gun. In general, I do not glow with tender feelings for samurai.
        3. atakan 11 November 2015 14: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          that is, if you say Japanese
          - lost their face long ago.

          although the whole world pretends not to remember such a purely Japanese expression.
  16. Redman 11 November 2015 17: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The first thing I thought about our 95x. The danger is real for them.
  17. Redman 11 November 2015 17: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Tu 95MS `` Bear '' at gunpoint?
  18. Old26 11 November 2015 19: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Corsair0304
    PPC, I have a brain explosion: Americans supply Patriot air defense systems to japams that have their own analogue of the Patriot

    Do not believe everything that is written. ChuSAM is intended to replace the Advanced Hawk air defense system. It has a range of 50, a reach in height - 10 (in Patriot - at least 80 km and a height of 24)

    Quote: F. Vastag
    No one bothers Us (Russia) - Large-scale deployment of Our S-400 Complexes, Iskander, Mig-31 Interceptors and Bastion Coastal Missile Complexes (for destroying American Aircraft Carriers) in North Korea (Against Japan, South Korea and the US military and their Complexes (Patriots) at US military bases) in the Asia-Pacific region. It would be a desire (to ensure the national security of Russia in our Far East) and political will (leadership of the country). And the North Koreans, I am sure, will not be at all against (Our Complexes and ABMs) on their territory.

    What a mania to try to place everywhere. Well, let's accept the DPRK as one of the republics of Russia and then place at least a bald trait. And then MIG-31, and Iskander, and S-400. And you asked, North Koreans would like to have such a gift from their northern neighbor? After all, our presence there, like rust, will begin to erode their ideology. Thank you for at least not the Yarses decided to deploy there. By the way, do you know that the whole territory of the DPRK is shot through by the tactical complexes of South Korea. Do you offer ours in advance for slaughter?