Military Review

Russia already has weapons capable of counteracting the global missile defense system

76
In recent years, Russian defense enterprises have developed and successfully tested several promising weapons systems "that are capable of solving combat missions in the conditions of an echeloned missile defense system," reports RIA News statement of Vladimir Putin.




At the beginning of the meeting dedicated to the activities of the defense industry, the Russian president proposed to consider in more detail the creation of weapons, which for the next 10 years "should determine the look of the Russian army." These systems should be the answer “to the challenges Russia faces” and guarantee the protection and security of the country.

“Over the past three years, defense industry enterprises have created and successfully tested a number of promising weapon systems that are capable of solving combat missions in a layered defense system. Such systems have already begun to enter the army this year. And today we will talk about how the development of new types of weapons is going on, ”
the president said, also proposing to consider the issues of "further improving the tactical and technical characteristics" of the combat systems.
Photos used:
RIA News. Alexey Nikolsky
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 11 November 2015 09: 11
    23
    It is good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway, but what about the article? unclear.
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 11 November 2015 09: 19
      +3
      Yes, curious. And TTX - classified?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 09: 35
        +7
        Quote: Tor5
        Yes, curious. And TTX - classified?

        And not only performance characteristics.
        1. _Vladislav_
          _Vladislav_ 11 November 2015 10: 29
          +4
          Russia’s missile and strike component has today been brought to a very decent level (if not perfect), which has no analogues, and is ahead of time.

          Therefore, the Americans are focusing on improving the missile defense component. And we are accordingly to overcome it.

          So.
          For Russia, it would not be out of place to engage in improving our own missile defense. The American missile-strike component does not have such a degree of overcoming missile defense. P.E. with equal opportunities in missile defense, Russia could seal (at least partially) the American nuclear component. The likelihood of such an interception would raise doubt among our “friends” about the appropriateness of various provocations.

          PS
          Therefore. Need domestic missile defense. At least the S-500. And then the S-500 that promises to be, this is only a step. This component needs to be developed, and its combat capabilities expanded. Since the preliminary performance characteristics of the S-500 I can not fully satisfy the defense needs of the Russian Federation from the United States.
          1. Kalmar
            Kalmar 11 November 2015 13: 54
            +3
            Russia’s missile and strike component has today been brought to a very decent level (if not perfect), which has no analogues, and is ahead of time.

            That would be more detailed from this place. We are very fond of sculpting the label "has no analogues-in-the-world" on everything that gives rise to our military-industrial complex, but these statements very often diverge from reality. The same goes for "perfection".

            For Russia, it would not be amiss to engage in improving our own missile defense

            To begin with, we would solve the air defense problem: it is still full of holes.

            The likelihood of such an interception would raise doubt among our “friends” about the appropriateness of various provocations.

            “Friends” will not be very important, they will still fight with us only with someone else's hands. A direct military conflict with Russia is disastrous for the United States.

            Of course, this does not mean that the ABM can be scored entirely and completely: the enemy should not have the feeling that he can hit us with impunity. But at the same time, one must understand that it is impossible to defend oneself against ICBMs with RGCs at the current level of technology development, which means that resources should be allocated to the corresponding components of missile defense without fanaticism (fortunately, there is still something to spend on them).
            1. _Vladislav_
              _Vladislav_ 11 November 2015 14: 15
              +1
              Quote: Kalmar
              That would be more detailed from this place. We love to sculpt the label "has no analogues in the world" on everything

              Well, everything is simple.
              RS-24 Yars (refers to the 5th generation missiles) with homing and components to help overcome the layered missile defense system.
              No one in the world has missiles with such capabilities. This is a fact.
              And how would it be justified.

              Well, firstly, no one in the world had a need (except for Russia) for some reason to overcome some kind of missile defense. Someone preparing to bomb. The United States has a huge number of obsolete missiles incapable of overcoming the missile defense system, and why? No one has a missile defense system in the world. And old missiles are enough to bomb anyone.

              P.E. they emphasized the development of the most mobile (stationary) system for intercepting Soviet / Russian missiles. The Star Wars program turned out to be zilch, but the states never hid the desire to learn how to shoot down all Russian missiles.

              And we, in turn, believed that the interception of a significant part of the missiles was impossible and therefore did not invest in the development of such a component as missile defense. Yes, maybe they would have invested, but only the Union collapsed.

              The closest pursuer of Yars, Trident II D5 (with RGCh) is significantly inferior to the Russian missile in its missile defense capabilities. Minutemans one-piece scrap do not even consider.


              1. Kalmar
                Kalmar 11 November 2015 15: 55
                -2
                RS-24 Yars (refers to the 5th generation missiles) with homing and components to help overcome the layered missile defense system.

                Ahh, what are you talking about. I thought it was about missiles in general (including the Kyrgyz Republic), and not just about ICBMs. ICBMs are not so interesting, they are weapons that in their right mind nobody will use anyway.
            2. andr327
              andr327 11 November 2015 19: 51
              0
              From the speech, GDP heard the main thing. that finally this year 21 YaRS will be put on combat duty. At last!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. volot-voin
      volot-voin 11 November 2015 09: 20
      29
      Quote: cniza
      It is good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway, but what about the article? unclear.

      As the enemies did not try, they could not finish off our defense industry in the 90s. Honor and glory to those people that in a difficult year they preserved it for us. Thanks to him, we are not yet bombed.
      That's who we need to praise and give orders, name streets, set an example, and not scatter awards to all kinds of artists like Makarevich there.
      1. alex-cn
        alex-cn 11 November 2015 09: 29
        +4
        I would not even talk about these weapons, not to mention TTX. Let them suffer with their missile defense, spend resources that will not help them.
        1. max702
          max702 11 November 2015 09: 37
          19
          Quote: alex-cn
          I would not even talk about these weapons, not to mention TTX. Let them suffer with their missile defense, spend resources that will not help them.

          Don't tell! Sometimes you need to demonstrate your capabilities, this sobering violent heads .. Hitler, for example, looking at the initial stage of the Finnish "winter" war, decided that the USSR army was a colossus with feet of clay and as a result decided that the USSR would be easier to conquer than England .. the result is known .. For example, large-scale Exercises in the USSR with the involvement of military attaches from other countries were carried out, among other things, with the aim of discouraging the desire and thoughts of some possible military success against the USSR, and it worked! They said a lot about calibers, but no one believed it, they confirmed it by deed and now they LISTEN to any of our words ...
      2. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 11 November 2015 09: 32
        +3
        But it’s not clear why it is necessary to voice the possibility of overcoming missile defense on air, if they were bugging their dollars into useless Aegis radars and ships. so off scale that it is necessary to make such statements?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 09: 36
          +7
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          But it’s not clear why voice over air the possibility of overcoming missile defense?

          And what would have heard overseas.
          1. arane
            arane 11 November 2015 09: 55
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            But it’s not clear why voice over air the possibility of overcoming missile defense?

            And what would have heard overseas.

            Exactly! If these creatures decide that the US makes them unpunished about them, they will immediately begin to "democratize" us!
            Must always be very doubtful
        2. Aksakal_07
          Aksakal_07 11 November 2015 10: 01
          +1
          Lobbyists of the American military-industrial complex will still achieve mass production of Aegis trash. And the Pentagon experts probably know something about our new products, so complete secrecy will not work. Therefore, the public announcement of "the entire list" of the capabilities of the new Russian weapon is a correct and very timely decision.
        3. LVMI1980
          LVMI1980 11 November 2015 10: 59
          0
          in PRO is dangerous ILLUSION OF SECURITY
          1. Buffalo
            Buffalo 11 November 2015 12: 23
            0
            It is not possible to defend 100% with a massive attack. But panic is even worse. It is necessary to take measures and actively prepare, if this cannot be avoided.
            1. NIKNN
              NIKNN 11 November 2015 19: 36
              +3
              Bison (7) RU Today, 12:23 ↑

              It is not possible to defend 100% with a massive attack. But panic is even worse. It is necessary to take measures and actively prepare, if this cannot be avoided.


              This is why there will be no direct clash between the United States and Russia.
              I apologize for not being able to provide a link, and there may be errors in the numbers, but not large ones.
              I read one of the many plans for delivering a nuclear attack on the USSR, in conclusion there was such an analysis:
              1 After a preemptive strike against the USSR, the loss of industrial potential is 60% human (meaning mobilization), which is about 40.
              2 After a retaliatory strike against the USA, the loss of industrial potential is 25-30% (depending on how much nuclear capacity remains) of human 20%
              Now the most important thing! Analysts of theirs calculated that after this the USSR WILL RESTORE, and the USA will never have it (everything was taken here and the loss of bases around the world and a lot more.) lol
        4. alex-cn
          alex-cn 11 November 2015 11: 04
          0
          Probably I was not quite right in my "silence", I need to voice it, but not now, but at the very end of the deployment and make them start all over again ...
        5. alex-cn
          alex-cn 11 November 2015 11: 04
          0
          Probably I was not quite right in my "silence", I need to voice it, but not now, but at the very end of the deployment and make them start all over again ...
      3. GUKTU
        GUKTU 11 November 2015 09: 43
        +3
        I support! But those who are falling apart (Chubais and company) - to the answer !!!
      4. vladimirw
        vladimirw 11 November 2015 09: 51
        +4
        Ish you, Makarevich your own, anti-Soviet, and those who work in the military-industrial complex, they are 99% for the Soviet power, for what to reward them !?
        1. veksha50
          veksha50 11 November 2015 10: 19
          +2
          Quote: vladimirw
          Ish you, Makarevich your own, anti-Soviet, and those who work in the military-industrial complex, they are 99% for the Soviet power, for what to reward them !?



          Hmm ... Wicked irony, very wicked ... however, unfortunately, appropriate ...
      5. veksha50
        veksha50 11 November 2015 10: 15
        +2
        Quote: volot-voin
        That's who we need to praise and give orders, name streets, set an example, and not scatter awards to all kinds of artists there like Makarevich.


        From time immemorial, there was such a thing as a "play actor" ... So - Makar once again proved that all his life he was just a play actor ...

        But our design scientists, industrial engineers, who have retained the potential of the defense industry-defense industry, are business people ...

        PS True, this reviewer was embarrassed by the fact that in the aforesaid - no specifics ... If everything is so secret (and it is), then was it worth talking out loud about it ??? There’s how unpleasant the Caspian calibrated surprise turned out to be ... Yes, and the problems around our base in Syria with the NATO electronic weapons base are also an unpleasant surprise for them ...

        Such surprises should pop out unexpectedly, like a devil from a snuff-box, and frighten the enemy to a dead hiccup ...
      6. silver_roman
        silver_roman 11 November 2015 12: 01
        +1
        Quote: volot-voin
        As the enemies did not try, they could not finish off our defense industry in the 90s.

        But they were very close recourse
        but in general today the State Corporation "Tactical Missile Armament" works in 3 shifts.
        It’s not even pleasing that such a pace and output, but the fact that there were skilled workers who can provide this third shift.
    4. AQUARIUS 65
      AQUARIUS 65 11 November 2015 09: 48
      0
      cniza
      It's good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway ...

      And the article about that, dear, about which you wrote in your comment to the point.
    5. WKS
      WKS 11 November 2015 10: 48
      0
      Quote: cniza
      It is good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway, but what about the article? unclear.

      About the same ...
    6. Altona
      Altona 11 November 2015 11: 22
      +1
      Quote: cniza
      It is good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway, but what about the article? unclear.

      ----------------------------------
      I also didn’t understand, apparently we are talking about high-precision medium and short-range weapons, electronic warfare systems that can neutralize the strike capabilities of the US and NATO ... In general, in Syria it has been shown what ships and radar missile defense systems in Europe will expect, as well as command points, airfields and ammunition depots ... And it’s not difficult to defeat the accumulation of armored vehicles ...
    7. oblako
      oblako 11 November 2015 11: 30
      +1
      How about what? "The whole world is in dust, but not now ..." sad
    8. maxim1987
      maxim1987 11 November 2015 13: 20
      +1
      Quote: cniza
      It is good that we have modern weapons and promising developments are underway, but what about the article? unclear


      only judging by the photo, there will be no one to develop it further
    9. The comment was deleted.
  2. over
    over 11 November 2015 09: 12
    +2
    We are waiting for details from the specialists. Yars? Or something else?
    1. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 11 November 2015 09: 19
      14
      It seems that Putin is not negotiating, we still have something, but that is still a secret. Guaranteed overcoming the missile defense of any country, from the lips of the country's president - this sounds convincing.
      1. cniza
        cniza 11 November 2015 09: 27
        +3
        Quote: Alexey-74
        It seems that Putin is not negotiating, we still have something, but that is still a secret. Guaranteed overcoming the missile defense of any country, from the lips of the country's president - this sounds convincing.



        While the "visors" are presented, the main trump cards will be obtained as needed.
        1. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 11 November 2015 10: 57
          0
          "... the main trump cards will be awarded as needed."
          ... or DELIVERED. As needed. hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. ver_
        ver_ 11 November 2015 13: 42
        0
        ... well, for example, the Yu-71- successfully completed 11 official misses, ...
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts 11 November 2015 09: 13
    38
    That is, the joke about the boot on the remote control and attempts to find a certain overseas country was not just)))
    1. Rav075
      Rav075 11 November 2015 09: 45
      +3
      Cool!!! Immediately I remembered the film DMB: "Maybe bang?" - "Bang, we will definitely bang, but later." good
  4. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 11 November 2015 09: 16
    +3
    With the advent of layered missile defense systems ... there were also means to overcome it ...
    For example, back in the 80s, when designing with RGH for ICBMs, it was envisaged that there were a large number of heavy and light false targets ... which significantly reduced the detection / destruction efficiency ... projects on hypersonic carriers were carried out in parallel ... and a lot of things were suggested by sovetsky / Russian engineers and designers ...
    1. Susul
      Susul 16 November 2015 20: 25
      0
      No wonder the USSR then took care of the ABM system in the early 70s, and it seems that even around Moscow there was something built from this area
  5. vell.65
    vell.65 11 November 2015 09: 17
    +2
    I think "Caliber" is still flowers, but what is even better and is being developed_ let the striped head hurts from thoughts. what
    1. venaya
      venaya 11 November 2015 09: 38
      0
      Quote: vell.65
      "Caliber" is still flowers, and what is even better and is being developed

      This is the whole point of the article, what is still being developed is not worth knowing, but we are not standing still and we are not thinking of standing:
      consider in detail the creation of weapons for the next 10 years
      These systems should be the answer "to the challenges faced by Russia" and guarantee the protection and security of the country
  6. NEXUS
    NEXUS 11 November 2015 09: 18
    +2
    In addition to Caliber, Yars, Rubezhy, the question of the Russian glider Yu-71 is very interesting ... and in my opinion, this is the most promising direction.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 November 2015 09: 22
    +3
    As they say in Russia: "For a cunning one ... there is always something with a screw."
  8. prabiz
    prabiz 11 November 2015 09: 23
    0
    For every American pipiska, Russia always has a pipiska with a screw! laughing
  9. Atemzug
    Atemzug 11 November 2015 09: 25
    +1
    We have SUCH devices! But we won’t tell you about them! (c) He brought his foot down.
  10. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 11 November 2015 09: 27
    +6
    An article about "But na-o-o-s .. has such a wunderwaffle, but we won't tell you about it!" Minus, in short.

    There is no doubt that promising systems are being developed in Russia for which missile defense will be an easy misunderstanding on the way to the goal. Many are aware of this; somewhere, something periodically flashes in the press and on the Internet.
    May God grant our designers not only to create and implement such systems in metal (composite, etc.), but to prepare for themselves a worthy shift. Honor and praise hi
    1. TSOOBER
      TSOOBER 11 November 2015 10: 52
      +4
      How do you like this prodigy?
  11. Neophyte
    Neophyte 11 November 2015 09: 27
    +1
    If we are talking about drum sets, then they should surpass the enemy’s missile defense in
    many parameters, including the latest advanced electronic warfare tools that instantly turn these missile defense systems into scrap.
  12. roskot
    roskot 11 November 2015 09: 35
    +1
    Russians hacked our missile defense.
  13. ararat
    ararat 11 November 2015 09: 35
    +1
    When will there be railroad strike nuclear forces ??? This will be the strongest shock for puppets and forgive-ok countries.
    1. cniza
      cniza 11 November 2015 09: 38
      0
      Quote: ararat
      When will there be railroad strike nuclear forces ??? This will be the strongest shock for puppets and forgive-ok countries.



      Work is in full swing, but this trump card is still up its sleeve.
  14. Mercenary
    Mercenary 11 November 2015 09: 40
    +3
    This was clear even after yesterday's statement by V.V. Putin. He doesn’t say anything in vain; he could understand in the West (well, stupid) laughing
  15. bugrovata
    bugrovata 11 November 2015 09: 40
    0
    Hooray! Anti-missile defense in their faces! tongue wassat angry
  16. gloomy fox
    gloomy fox 11 November 2015 09: 49
    +2
    that Russia will still find something to answer to the missile defense system, I think they guess and so. but they still will not refuse to build this system. this is a shield and sword competition. Give boh to our designers to give a decent answer to their system so that they wouldn’t think it would be enough and the caliber is only part of the iceberg. Everything else is a secret! bully
  17. Wedmak
    Wedmak 11 November 2015 09: 50
    0
    Here are just good air defense systems and a nuclear club are now saving Russia from the bolder steps of overseas "friends".
  18. Oman 47
    Oman 47 11 November 2015 09: 52
    -6
    Minus.
    Empty non-informative article.
    Where do admins look? hi
  19. paxil
    paxil 11 November 2015 09: 53
    +5
    I respect Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich - the man said, the man did. Still, Medvedev would have possessed such a quality, it would have been nice, otherwise the whole government is a damn damn.
    1. 31R-US
      31R-US 11 November 2015 17: 26
      0
      Once again the cedar was pushed into the Rostec edren loaf, well, a full paragraph.
      So it is necessary.
  20. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 11 November 2015 09: 58
    +2
    Quote: Atemzug
    We have SUCH devices! But we won’t tell you about them! (c) He brought his foot down.


    The amendment is Mango-Mango. And do not tell about the devices, they still will not believe. Here they showed one volley of "calibers" - immediately the tone of the conversations changed, a lot of problems were solved by the trailer.
  21. DenZ
    DenZ 11 November 2015 09: 59
    0
    Over the past three years, the enterprises of the military-industrial complex have created and successfully tested a number of promising weapons systems that are capable of solving combat missions in the context of a layered missile defense system.

    Created then created only where are they in the series? If there was a series, we would already know about it. R&D is very good. But if tomorrow is war ...
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 11 November 2015 10: 28
      0
      Quote: DenZ
      If there was a series, we would already know about it. R&D is very good.



      Hmm ... Without R&D, there is no series ... VPK-OPK - this is not a tablecloth-self-assembly ...
  22. Mordvin
    Mordvin 11 November 2015 10: 00
    +1
    In my opinion, the main danger of missile defense is psychological. We will of course create (or have already created) a rocket
    which will overcome any missile defense system, but the "partners" may (or have already developed) a false sense of security
    from return on our part.
    1. AUL
      AUL 11 November 2015 11: 45
      0
      And who told you that this is only a missile capable of breaking through missile defense? I think that a surprise can be concluded in other, very unexpected decisions that render missile defense incapable. BUT ... you know less - you sleep better!
      1. Mordvin
        Mordvin 11 November 2015 13: 51
        0
        I apologize, maybe I didn’t put it right. But nevertheless, the missile is considered to me the most likely means of overcoming the ABM, although on the other hand it would be short-sighted to refuse
        our scientists from the defense industry, they have always been able to invent something like that from which the foe's veins will shake. Again, it is difficult to implement, but the option of a political overcoming of missile defense is not ruled out, after all, it is not their own native to the Europeans, but imposed from overseas in a "voluntary-compulsory" manner. There must be people there, including politicians in power who do not want to be targets for our, shall we say, means of destruction.
  23. polite people
    polite people 11 November 2015 10: 04
    +1
    Multiply all TTX by x. Get the present. Military trick. soldier
  24. Alagez
    Alagez 11 November 2015 10: 19
    +1
    It is necessary to bend your line everywhere and in everything!
  25. DMB3000
    DMB3000 11 November 2015 10: 36
    +1
    Quote: Rav075
    Cool!!! Immediately I remembered the film DMB: "Maybe bang?" - "Bang, we will definitely bang, but later." good

    In general, I never liked the dmb movie. she was filmed in terms of ridiculing the army. it's not worth joking with a real army.
  26. pascal309
    pascal309 11 November 2015 10: 45
    +2
    https://youtu.be/_FgPBGteLzU На видео видно в руках одного из военных плокатик океаническая многоцелевая система " Статус-6", что то очень серьёзное, и я думаю это для наших партнеров было показано. Так что прав наш главный, у нас есть что противопоставить.
  27. 2s5giacints
    2s5giacints 11 November 2015 10: 49
    0
    Quote: paxil
    I respect Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich - the man said, the man did. Still, Medvedev would have possessed such a quality, it would have been nice, otherwise the whole government is a damn damn.

    tip in your tongue (about Medvedev), and today he said that the retirement age will still rise ...
  28. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 11 November 2015 11: 05
    0
    According to the mace of 100 thousand tons to the mainland and everything will be ok! This will be the Russian answer.
  29. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 11 November 2015 11: 12
    +2
    Thanks to V.V. Putin for finding strength, accomplices, and pushing the dead of all stripes to the background and forcing the country to take up defense and the creation of a military-industrial complex in the country. This made it possible for Russia now not to worry about a sudden global strike by the United States and NATO. On the contrary, these Western Jesuits themselves began to fear Russia in most areas of combat capabilities.
  30. Denimax
    Denimax 11 November 2015 11: 18
    +1
    All missile defense is pure bluff. Once with SOI scared. And the illiterate government was led to fear.
    As long as there is an ICBM with great destructive power, no one will risk a direct military conflict.
    1. AlexTires
      AlexTires 11 November 2015 12: 23
      0
      according to some experts, the essence of missile defense is that its missiles can be used to launch an atomic strike on strategic nuclear forces with a minimum flying time, which will seriously weaken the retaliatory strike or delay its delivery in the event of destruction of the first persons of the state who have the right to issue an order to apply Nuclear weapons ...
  31. atamankko
    atamankko 11 November 2015 11: 22
    +1
    There is a reaction to every action.
  32. Buffalo
    Buffalo 11 November 2015 11: 33
    0
    We have better still!
    Go to YouTube, type in the search phrase: Kimovsk UFO.
    And do not forget to turn on the sound, there is only 13 seconds. But impressive!
    1. DenZ
      DenZ 11 November 2015 12: 23
      0
      Go to YouTube, type in the search phrase: Kimovsk UFO.

      Do not collect any rubbish on the Internet. This seems to be a serious site.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  33. holgert
    holgert 11 November 2015 11: 56
    0
    Good news, but the article "" about nothing "" .....
  34. AlexTires
    AlexTires 11 November 2015 12: 13
    +1
    There were 90, there was the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, they left without any complaints ... But the guys did not understand, now blame yourself .... That's it, cuckoo! am
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 11 November 2015 12: 21
      +1
      There is time to throw stones and time to collect stones.
      I would start from the beginning - to judge Gorbachev, Chubais, and others, from the "fifth column". - You will need to cut wood, in Siberia.
  35. Yugra
    Yugra 11 November 2015 12: 57
    +1
    The idea, of course, is childish, but I think that in Russia there is such a weapon that it’s just not the time to talk about it. And its power is such that the mattress covers are still washed. That thought doesn’t leave me ...
  36. Zomanus
    Zomanus 11 November 2015 13: 57
    +1
    Well, I think that not only missiles were meant here,
    but also electronic warfare equipment, which at the right moment will blind all
    that the Americans have pushed around our borders.
    Well, rockets are already the final stage.
    This is approximately as usual in articles about C-300 / 400 demonstrate launcher with TPK,
    although it’s not there, it’s the COMPLEX ...
  37. Susul
    Susul 16 November 2015 20: 27
    0
    But what if the S-600 learns to intercept missile defense at the stage of dispersal?