Military Review

Project "ZZ". Win Russian? No problem!

128
The chief of staff of the US Army, General Mark Millie, publicly stated that the greatest threat to America is Russia. He also called Russia an "aggressor." A few days later, another man by the name of Mark, and by the name of Adomanis, writing for Forbes magazine, figured out: can the Russians really defeat the Americans? In the meantime, the EU has conceived to extend and expand anti-Russian sanctions. However, all these topics are boring; top news in the West - a photo session of Barack Obama for the LGBT magazine.


Project "ZZ". Win Russian? No problem!


The “biggest threat” to the United States is Russia. Her “aggressive behavior” is disturbing, General Mark Millie, chief of staff of the US Army, told the public at a forum under the auspices of DefenseOne. Millie refused to predict who will win the war, the United States or Russia, but pompously stated that the United States has “pretty good opportunities,” the site notes. Association of the United States Army.

The general spoke about Russia in response to a favorite question of the American press: who is the most dangerous enemy, who is more threatening the national security of the United States — Russia or the Islamic State. Milli, without thinking, answered that Russia is in the first place, because “this is the only country on Earth that has the ability to destroy us from the point of view of the nuclear potential,” and still Russia is “acting aggressively” in Ukraine and in other countries. not).

Russia, as well as the Islamic State, the Taliban and Al Qaeda, according to the general, should be "neutralized" by US forces, who stand guard over the "security of the American people." Milli believes that America needs to maintain "military power." He called the readiness of the military to resist threats his “main concern”.

Millie intends to fight with enemies not by number, but by skill. The general promised to "build up" the qualitative advantages of the army, because "this is better than a quantitative advantage."

It is quite possible that these words of a great military leader prompted the famous columnist Mark Adomanis, the author "Forbes", ask yourself (and readers) the question: “Could The Russians Defeat The US Army?” Can Russians defeat the US Army?

Not so long ago, the Russian army was considered an empty place and a pale numb. Comparing it with the army of the USSR caused only laughter. Analysts have pointed out: the Russian army collapsed incompetence, embezzlement, demographic crisis 1990-x. But what to say, if the Russian defense minister himself “was personally involved in thefts and murder” (the head of the Russian defense ministry was personally implicated in theft and murder), writes Adomanis. ( Link to the Adomanis source for the curious.)

In short, the dough of this army hardly suited to make a modern, efficient army out of it. In the US, they talked about the weakness and exhaustion of the Russian army, and few people thought that military reforms could quickly lead to the creation of armed forces, which are now compared with the US.

Adomanis reminds: if a couple of years ago or even a year ago someone had declared that during a collision, the Russian army had a chance to defeat the American army, they would have ridiculed it and called it a cretin (option: an agent of the Kremlin). Surprisingly, this is not surprising, something else is surprising: now the experts seem to have come to an agreement - they all repeat the exact opposite. They have reached the point that they assure the public that the Russians “in a fair fight” can defeat the American army.

Where does such a change in consciousness?

According to the observer, bureaucratic wars are going on in Washington. And the statements of some senior army ranks are their echoes reaching the public. The fact is that statements about the power, combat capability of the Russian army, its threat to NATO do not withstand any criticism: the funds spent on the Russian and American armies are incomparable. It is hardly possible to conclude, Adomanis writes, that the US Army and the Russian Army have “almost equal combat capabilities.”

Adomanis counted something. Over the past decade and a half, the US Army has spent on each soldier about 10 times more than the Russian army. The browser calls such a difference "gigantic."

But maybe the Russians during the reforms reduced the gap? Not. According to Adomanis, for the last 2-3 of the year, the difference has decreased insignificantly. And we should not forget the previous opinions of experts who called the leadership of the Russian army corrupt and incompetent. If so, then in order to achieve new combat capabilities, "even remotely resembling" the capabilities of the US Army, "corrupt and incompetent Russians" would have to introduce some kind of sophisticated technique that would suddenly "increase the combat power" of the armed forces.

Adomanis himself is skeptical about the emergence of such a “technique” and, in general, about increasing the combat power of the Russian army. In his opinion, the Kremlin could hardly have done this.

It is probably the “bureaucratic wars” that Adomanis mentioned that caused the “anti-Russian hysteria” in the United States. Justin Raimondo spoke about her on the portal. Antiwar.com.

Paranoid hysteria led the Americans "on the march." Americans "are on the march," says a journalist whose goal is to surround Russia. This is a key element of the new strategy, which, by the way, explains Putin’s strong concern.

John Kerry recently visited Central Asia, where he negotiated "with despots" like Islam Karimov. Kerry is not embarrassed that Karimov’s “bloody dictatorship” is a model for “tyrants all over the world.” The Washington Post reporter had to leave the room after he asked Karimov "uncomfortable questions" about the trampling of "human rights" in the republic.

But human rights, suppressed by Karimov, do not interest the State Department. The goal of American foreign policy is Putin. Accordingly, he is the main accused. Central accusations: the situation in Ukraine, the Russian "threat", the war in Syria and so on. Hence the insane ideas of potential US presidential candidates: the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria and even the idea of ​​knocking down Russian aircraft in the Syrian sky. Authorship of it belongs to the senator hawk Marco Rubio. This Republican, writing fiction that the US is allegedly not modernizing its nuclear arsenal, has bothered to create a new missile defense system in Eastern Europe. Ukraine, he is ready to accept in NATO. Undoubtedly, Rubio is pushing Europe towards the “vision” of 1950, when the specter of total war between superpowers loomed in the world. And this “retrograde vision,” the author notes, is shared by the majority of Republican rivals Rubio. And the Democrats are eager to fight - here Mrs. Clinton and even B. Sanders, with his "echo of the propaganda of the Cold War." This person supports American aid to Ukraine, including military, and is in favor of "freezing Russian assets around the world."

The theme of the economic confrontation with Russia continues the German press.

«Handelsblatt» notes that the European Union is going to extend sanctions against Russia.

EU leaders intend to expand economic sanctions against Russia for another six months. This was reported to the publication of sources from the governing circles of the EU and the German federal government. On the expansion of sanctions Europe will agree, obviously, at the EU summit, scheduled for December 18.

Why did European leaders decide to extend the sanctions? The newspaper indicates that the EU linked the lifting of sanctions with the full implementation of the peace agreement reached in Minsk. This condition “was not fulfilled by Russia,” the source told a reporter.

* * *


So, the American commanders again declared Russia "the greatest threat" to the United States and called it the "aggressor." The head of the US Army headquarters, General Mark Milli, has no doubt that the United States has “pretty good opportunities” for defeating Russia. Apparently, Forbes's observer Mark Adomanis, who believes that the leadership of the Russian army is incompetent and mired in corruption, has no doubt about this. In addition, the US spends ten times more money on the army than the Kremlin.

The portal Antiwar.com recalls that the United States is successfully turning over political deals in Central Asia, “surrounding” Russia, and the European Union intends in December not only to extend sanctions against Russia, but also to expand them.

Obviously, all this will allow the West to "defeat the Russians."

However, Western nations have little interest in the victorious reports of generals and experts. Top news overseas - Obama's photo session for the LGBT magazine.


Obama also got on the cover. OUT magazine, photo by Ryan Pfluger


President starred for cover "OUT magazine". The pederasts of the progressive Western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
128 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Temples
    Temples 11 November 2015 09: 05 New
    57
    Obama found his place.
    Rather, he emphasized exactly where his place is among the pedirasts!
    The personification of piderasts!
    It will be necessary to do something after the second term.
    As they say - whoever studied at that is useful there wassat
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 11 November 2015 09: 18 New
        31
        It seems to me (and not only to me) that Michelle Obama is a fagot or a transsexual, like them in a skirt! (look carefully at not (th, th)!
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 11 November 2015 09: 20 New
          41
          Russian army collapsed by incompetence


          And where did the assertion that the US military is competent come from?

          Any examples?


          1. _Vladislav_
            _Vladislav_ 11 November 2015 10: 04 New
            38
            US Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milli has no doubt that the United States has “pretty good opportunities” to defeat Russia.

            The combat capabilities of the United States are the best in the world. But today we can firmly say that in the event of a non-nuclear collision (if the United States suddenly wants to attack the Russian Federation, suppose), the United States will not succeed. Opportunities to seize the territory of R.F. not enough. The main tool of American expansion is AUG. But AUG when approaching the territory of R.F. at a range of aviation strike, runs the risk of encountering superior capabilities of the Russian armed forces on the continental part.
            (yesterday by the way there was an article on VO http://topwar.ru/85932-skolko-avianoscev-potopili-podlodki.html, I liked it very much)

            This also includes the action of the armed forces of both countries in local conflicts. Collisions, as a rule, occur on land, in addition, near the borders of the Russian Federation, where Russia has good combat capabilities. In addition, Russia has a very long territory. It is one thing to bombard small Yugoslavia with a length of 102,350 km², and a completely different country with a territory of 17 km², which, using this quality, can reach anyone.

            I do not compare collisions in the event of a nuclear exchange. It is pointless, in this case there is only one outcome.
            Of course, R.F. It doesn’t have the opportunity to capture the United States, but it has enough potential to protect itself and its interests near the border.

            PS
            The US Army is the strongest and most formidable in the world - yes. But, I will not lie if I say that it is morally extremely difficult for an American soldier to fight with the armed forces of the Russian Federation. Just because they weren’t preparing for this. Destroy Russia, the states, if they planned it from the inside. But to fight with the Russians on the battlefield is a completely different level, this has never happened before. And as the American military leaders said, the United States has really good combat capabilities, but it would be too bold to say that these capabilities will be enough.

            P.P.S.
            In a hypothetical collision during an attack on R.F. (non-nuclear), the USA, having lost one AUG, would refuse further military operations. This is exactly what an American soldier cannot fight to the last. Because historical, they, it never was necessary. What is the point of laying bones when you just swim away, and you are safe at home, surrounded by two oceans.
            1. DV69
              DV69 11 November 2015 10: 47 New
              17
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              The main tool of American expansion is AUG


              As the practice of AUG shows, the USA is used against such states as Grenada or Panama, which have never had real opportunities to counter these shock groups.
              Even during the war in Iraq, with its undeveloped (outdated) air defense system, most of the sorties were made from NATO bases in Turkey and Italy.
              Therefore, I consider the example with the use of carrier strike groups not correct.
              It’s another matter that in the land operation the United States does not have allies who can provide worthy assistance to the Americans, the European members of the alliance have reduced their military budgets too much after the collapse of the USSR.
              1. oblako
                oblako 11 November 2015 12: 06 New
                +4
                Therefore, I consider the example with the use of carrier strike groups not correct.

                In part, only one can agree with this statement. Aviation AUG was widely used in Vietnam, which actively "suppressed" AUG aviation. But there was really no way to reach the AUG ships.
                1. DV69
                  DV69 11 November 2015 12: 49 New
                  +1
                  Quote: oblako
                  In part, we can only agree with this statement.


                  I meant the use of AUG against Russia. Therefore, he wrote about the incorrectness of the statement.
                  1. guard
                    guard 11 November 2015 16: 47 New
                    +8
                    Russians “in fair battle” can defeat the American army.


                    The fact of the matter is that the Americans exclude the very possibility of a fight in a fair fight, and why do they need it, they put the whole world on loans through the IMF, etc., and live especially without straining, well, or they lived ... (parasites their mother ...)
                    1. Temples
                      Temples 12 November 2015 17: 54 New
                      +1
                      But to fight with the Russians on the battlefield is a completely different level, this has never happened before.

                      In 1918, the United States was an interventionist and fought against Russia in Russia.
                2. sharp-lad
                  sharp-lad 11 November 2015 22: 55 New
                  +2
                  Old McCain was quite enough!
            2. Shark Lover
              Shark Lover 11 November 2015 12: 51 New
              11
              Of course, one should not underestimate the enemy, but one must study and see his capabilities. But where and how to evaluate them? I studied, by official necessity, the 3rd Libyan Amerikos Marine Corps, which in Okinawa. Any crap, TTX, features, etc. But everything is based on technical capabilities, but people control the technology. And the commander of their battalion reported strong decomposition of hp, narcotics, gambling, etc. So how do you rate them? Maybe this is a complete rabble and downs on a BMW of the last series?
            3. Azitral
              Azitral 11 November 2015 14: 25 New
              +4
              They can. If it comes to an attack on US territory, they can. In a merciless conflict it is not clear - for what, for money - no. The dead do not need money.
            4. NIKNN
              NIKNN 11 November 2015 20: 09 New
              +8
              _Vladislav_ RU Today, 10:04

              I do not compare collisions in the event of a nuclear exchange. It is pointless, in this case there is only one outcome.


              Today I already wrote somewhere that I read the conclusions of their analysts on the exchange of nuclear strikes. According to theirs conclusions it turns out that the United States striking first and getting the answer with the remaining means will have approximately the following alignment (part of the parameters.
              Industrial potential destroyed
              USSR 60% USA 25-30%
              Mobilization reserve will be lost
              USSR 40% USA 20-25%
              Many more parameters were compared, but the conclusion theirs stunned by analysts:
              The Soviet economy will recover, but the United States is no longer request
              1. demon1978
                demon1978 11 November 2015 21: 05 New
                +9
                Quote: NIKNN
                The Soviet economy will recover, but the United States is no longer


                Probably already then, someone suspected about Elulstone and the plan of the "Great North American Strait" by Academician Kurchatov request laughing
              2. igorka357
                igorka357 12 November 2015 03: 51 New
                +3
                It’s absolutely true, this is the US military doctrine, 20-25% for them, this is unacceptable damage, in simple words, if twenty out of a hundred people are killed, they won’t carry out an operation! Up to 80% were dropped out of units in Chechnya in our country .. and again in battle!
          2. Vend
            Vend 11 November 2015 10: 56 New
            16
            Quote: bulvas
            Russian army collapsed by incompetence


            And where did the assertion that the US military is competent come from?

            Any examples?

            We fell apart so much that we gave a good kick to Georgia in 2008, now we kick ISIS. The United States is so afraid of our collapsed army that it declares us an aggressor. US Competence Proved by Hollywood Films laughing And failed military operations somehow do not fit with films
            1. zloybond
              zloybond 11 November 2015 11: 06 New
              22
              the United States itself is now continuing the occupation of Europe (Germany, Poland, the Baltic states ...)
              a country that has robbed the land of indigenous peoples on its territory. a country that has destroyed state borders and states, a country that has grown and sponsors terrorism on the planet, a country that has more prisons and prisoners on its own territory than anywhere else in the world. The US Army is killing women and children without permission from state authorities on its territory. US Army bombing hospital. ..
              The USA is a terrorist entity on the planet.
          3. lav67
            lav67 11 November 2015 16: 06 New
            +1
            From all over the world experience, there hasn’t been, and most likely will not be. they didn’t really fight with the real enemy (whatever on their territory, etc.)
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. hydrox
          hydrox 11 November 2015 09: 48 New
          +7
          Quote: Baikonur
          It seems to me (and not only to me) that Michelle Obama is a fagot or a shemale


          Each president - on his own cover! lol
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 11 November 2015 10: 17 New
            +9
            Quote: hydrox
            Each president - on his own cover!

            Just why is the face in the photo? Logically, there should be another part of the body. repeat
            1. Sober
              Sober 11 November 2015 10: 38 New
              12
              They probably are not much different.
        4. Penzuck
          Penzuck 11 November 2015 10: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: Baikonur
          It seems to me (and not only to me) that Michelle Obama is a fagot or a transsexual, like them in a skirt! (look carefully at not (th, th)!

          Women do not have an Adam's apple (not visible), he is the "Adam's apple" ... It makes sense to look at the neck and the width of the jaw ...
        5. Down House
          Down House 11 November 2015 10: 58 New
          0
          Quote: Baikonur
          It seems to me (and not only to me) that Michelle Obama is a fagot or a transsexual, like them in a skirt! (look carefully at not (th, th)!

          It is unlikely, rather just different physiological features in different races, or more precisely, black women almost always have large arms and legs.
          Therefore, I think that the "cover" of the homosexual Omama is real laughing
        6. free
          free 12 November 2015 08: 44 New
          +1
          yeah got homosexual!
        7. Finntroll
          Finntroll 13 November 2015 10: 53 New
          0
          Sorry, but this video is far-fetched crap! In the Russian world, without any disruptive videos, everyone already knows that Obama, as well as the vast majority of Western politicians, are notable pederasts - there are more letters and the very essence of such personalities is revealed more fully laughing something like this
        8. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 14 November 2015 02: 38 New
          0
          Crap. I can provide a bunch on this subject. What's the point?
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 11 November 2015 09: 51 New
      26
      Destroy Russia, no matter how paradoxical it may sound, only the Russians themselves can fight and this is a centuries-old dream of the West, one thing is that at the moment when the mortal danger hangs over the Fatherland, Russia rallies stronger than the most durable metal and gives lyule to any aggressor, and this is the president of the pederast Obama America’s gay magazine declared the main ally, as they say the award found a hero.
    3. sannych
      sannych 11 November 2015 10: 14 New
      11
      Well now he will be the banner of perverts! There, in principle, is his place. I relate to him, I think like most
      1. Sober
        Sober 11 November 2015 10: 40 New
        +5
        I do not belong to him at all! stop
        1. GYGOLA
          GYGOLA 11 November 2015 14: 17 New
          0
          I thought he was homosexual in deeds. After the photo I don’t know what to think, but it’s funny.
    4. sir_obs
      sir_obs 11 November 2015 17: 00 New
      0
      Rather, this very place found Obama
    5. Lenin
      Lenin 11 November 2015 19: 03 New
      +1
      I agree, I laugh neither to the magician, capaciously, briefly and accurately. Now it’s clear why I was doing gracefully with dumbbells .... laughing wassat
    6. Alena Frolovna
      Alena Frolovna 11 November 2015 22: 23 New
      +9
      The president has starred for the cover of OUT magazine. The buggers of the progressive western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"


      1. Basarev
        Basarev 12 November 2015 06: 55 New
        -6
        Enough, enough fools! It’s not a secret to anyone that Obama is simply spinning Congress. As regards the combat capabilities of the troops — then I am on the side of the Americans — the life of a soldier is in honor there, and not like ours — women still give birth. And besides, there the standard of living is an order of magnitude higher than ours, and not so important, at what cost. Because the level of material consumption is primary, and all kinds of abstract ideas there are doglike. The main thing is that their people prosper in wealth and glory, and all kinds of impoverished savages - who do they care about?
        1. Zlatik
          Zlatik 12 November 2015 07: 13 New
          +1
          Another traitor!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. alexej123
          alexej123 12 November 2015 12: 43 New
          +2
          Why prosper? For the next generations? After all, America will never give up its debt. if they begin to live honestly, then EVERYTHING. In your opinion, it turns out - it is necessary to collect credits, even without the possibility of return, relish them to eat and drink, and the fact that the children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren will give them - well, let them, as they have to - "this is their funeral." The ideology is typically consumers and egoists.
        4. Samen
          Samen 12 November 2015 14: 51 New
          +2
          It’s not a secret to anyone that Obama is simply spinning Congress.

          If you are in the know, maybe specify: on what part of the body of the Congress, is it the "Congress turns Obama"? repeat
        5. lukewarm
          lukewarm 13 November 2015 10: 39 New
          0
          It's sarcasm?
      2. lukewarm
        lukewarm 13 November 2015 10: 39 New
        0
        Black lord
    7. zstognienko
      zstognienko 13 November 2015 03: 00 New
      0
      Paying for electricity 2 times less is real! I advise absolutely everyone to read this article from an electrician with more than 20 years of experience http://sh.sg/save Personally, I use this method and am unrealistically satisfied!
  2. vorobey
    vorobey 11 November 2015 09: 06 New
    10
    Oleg, well, why so frankly the president of such a country ...

    I realized what Serdyukov-stools star has ... it was he who relaxed the Americans ... it turns out rightly deserved blizzard ...
    1. Mart
      11 November 2015 09: 09 New
      41
      Quote: vorobey
      Oleg, well, why so frankly the president of such a country ...

      Hello Sasha! You see how it came out: Putin has been called the most influential man in the world for the third year in Forbes. Obama was cheated. Not fair! So they picked up a magazine for him.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 11 November 2015 09: 23 New
        11
        Quote: Mart
        Here, too, this cover was picked up.


        on Senka hat? laughing Hello Oleg .. I comment a little on your articles now I'm sorry hi
      2. demon1978
        demon1978 11 November 2015 09: 56 New
        +9
        Quote: Mart
        Obama cheated. Not fair! So they picked up a magazine for him.


        Defined, so to speak, his scope of maximum competence ??? !!! request laughing

        US President Barack Obama was the first incumbent to appear on the cover of a magazine for sexual minorities. His portrait was printed in OUT magazine, specializing in pederast fashion and pederast style, writes The Washington Times.

        The image of Obama says: "Our President", and below - three words: "Ally. Hero. Icon".

        The title "Honorary Black Anus" when planning to assign ??? !!! what
        1. Xsanchez
          Xsanchez 12 November 2015 17: 39 New
          +1
          It is a pity that we, in Moscow, the magazine "Flirt" was closed - there is a place for him: with pictures, with telephone numbers.
      3. tundra
        tundra 11 November 2015 09: 58 New
        +2
        ! So he picked up a magazine
        .... On the subject of a magazine .... laughing
      4. 2s1122
        2s1122 11 November 2015 09: 59 New
        +5
        Guys, it can be seen that Putin has been ranked first in Forbes for 3 years, and Obama is in first place in a magazine for LGBT people. You can see who is capable of what.
      5. DV69
        DV69 11 November 2015 12: 50 New
        +1
        Quote: Mart
        Forbes has named Putin the most influential man in the world for three years. Obama was cheated. Not fair! So they picked up a magazine for him.


        He wasn’t picked up by a magazine; he was simply made the most influential homosexual of the planet.
  3. cniza
    cniza 11 November 2015 09: 08 New
    +9
    However, Western nations have little interest in the victorious reports of generals and experts. Top news overseas - Obama's photo session for the LGBT magazine.


    Project "ZZ". Win Russian? No problem!


    Obama also got on the cover. OUT magazine, photo by Ryan Pfluger


    The president has starred for the cover of OUT magazine. The buggers of the progressive western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"



    A very colorful result, in principle, of a good article.
  4. Wolka
    Wolka 11 November 2015 09: 13 New
    +5
    what is there to argue, the biggest threat to America, it is they themselves, the degeneration of the nation (if the Yankees are considered a nation at all) is evident ...
  5. ImPerts
    ImPerts 11 November 2015 09: 16 New
    17
    So, the American commanders again declared Russia "the greatest threat" to the United States and called it the "aggressor." The head of the US Army headquarters, General Mark Milli, has no doubt that the United States has “pretty good opportunities” for defeating Russia. Apparently, Forbes's observer Mark Adomanis, who believes that the leadership of the Russian army is incompetent and mired in corruption, has no doubt about this. In addition, the US spends ten times more money on the army than the Kremlin.
    1. sannych
      sannych 11 November 2015 10: 11 New
      31
      So, the American military leaders again declared Russia “the greatest threat” to the United States and called it “the aggressor”.
      As the saying goes, whose cow would moo.
  6. Neophyte
    Neophyte 11 November 2015 09: 18 New
    +9
    He’s been a gay icon for a long time! Is he really counting on their help in the elections? Is it time for us to return to considering the idea of ​​A. Sakharov about the hydrogen charge off the coast of the USA with the subsequent tsunami 1,2 km high? It’s clear that it’s a pity to drown 60 million. Americans, but to scare the likelihood of such an event is quite real!
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 November 2015 09: 18 New
    +5
    Obviously, all this will allow the West to "defeat the Russians."

    The history of stupid people does not teach anything. Whatever Russia has beaten in its history, but the desire to defeat us does not disappear, and at times becomes manic. Of course, you can spit on these statements and not pay attention, but then this behavior will spur the enemy to even greater attacks. And it is necessary to respond by strengthening the power of our army and actions that will discourage the desire to make any body movements in our direction.
    The buggers of the progressive western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"

    Birds of a feather flock together.
  8. petr1965
    petr1965 11 November 2015 09: 24 New
    +7
    the time of all the leaders put in place
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 11 November 2015 09: 49 New
      +3
      Quote: petr1965
      the time of all the leaders put in place



      Hmm ... If Obama is a gay leader, and Russia and its leader are called the aggressor, then it doesn’t raise questions of who is who ..
      so that talk of a possible victory over Russia by itself is no longer ...

      Passive, by definition, cannot win ...
  9. volot-voin
    volot-voin 11 November 2015 09: 24 New
    +4
    US Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milli has publicly stated that Russia is the biggest threat to America.

    Thanks to the enemy for being honest. We also "love" them and thank God we prepare our own "treats". The fool could only believe that once the Cold War ended.
    I much prefer an honest enemy who openly voices their intentions than all this talk about reboots and overloads.
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 11 November 2015 09: 55 New
      +4
      And where did you see the honest position of the Yankees?
      Cowardice, meanness, provocations and a shot in the back in the end - this does not characterize us, but the Americans, so there is no need to praise "honest enemies"
  10. maikl50jrij
    maikl50jrij 11 November 2015 09: 24 New
    +4
    "Project 33" ... How many centuries of this attempt? Since the formation of Russia! Let them talk! And nothing looks like a banana on that magazine love wink
  11. NEXUS
    NEXUS 11 November 2015 09: 26 New
    +3
    This is how much it needs to be degraded in order to consider the photo shoot with the president an important event, when there is a war in the Middle East, there is intense tension and crisis in the world, when there is an uproar of terrorism around the world ...
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 11 November 2015 09: 57 New
      +2
      So this is an event for Pid Aras (and for Obama), and not for us.
      1. Sober
        Sober 12 November 2015 01: 47 New
        0
        And for us, entertainment on this topic. And then there are a lot of serious topics.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. X Y Z
    X Y Z 11 November 2015 09: 27 New
    +4
    US Army Chief of Staff General Mark Milli has no doubt that the United States has “pretty good opportunities” to defeat Russia.


    I doubt it. These doubts were inspired by what I saw in a hotel in Turkey. Our campers, cheerful and collected, always got the best seats and the best food, getting up early. Western guests got up later and, coming to the restaurant, could not understand why all the seats were occupied, but there was no longer any normal food. They looked stunned and confused (they were already used to getting all the best without a fight) and turning to the staff, they tried to solve their problems for money. It looked comical. And then the phrase "are you going to butt with these people !?" To many, this consideration may seem frivolous, but I think otherwise.
  14. andrei332809
    andrei332809 11 November 2015 09: 27 New
    +4
    The president has starred for the cover of OUT magazine. The buggers of the progressive western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"
    Is Putin to blame here too? belay
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 11 November 2015 10: 01 New
      +6
      Quote: andrei332809
      Is Putin to blame here too?


      How to say ... I would put it another way here: Putin’s definite merit is that they obraced Obama’s opid, definitely! laughing
      1. Sober
        Sober 12 November 2015 01: 50 New
        0
        Neatly, so, turned up. wink
    2. Sober
      Sober 12 November 2015 01: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: andrei332809
      Is Putin to blame here too?

      Well, and who !!! ???
  15. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 11 November 2015 09: 27 New
    11
    Obama was not placed on the cover of the Times magazine, where our president, recognized as the most influential person of the year, was posted, and 3 times in a row. And out of resentment, Obama decided to become the first jo, oh, face in another magazine.
    1. arane
      arane 11 November 2015 09: 49 New
      +3
      Quote: coconut tim
      Obama was not placed on the cover of the Times magazine, where our president, recognized as the most influential person of the year, was posted, and 3 times in a row. And out of resentment, Obama decided to become the first jo, oh, face in another magazine.

      Yes, why on the cover of the face of the Abama and not his w-pa? This is a newsletter!
      Or is he exclusively orally? recourse
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 11 November 2015 10: 03 New
        +3
        Quote: arane
        Or is he exclusively orally? recourse

        laughing Most likely, this option is more like rear-wheel drive.
      2. V.ic
        V.ic 11 November 2015 10: 15 New
        +1
        Quote: arane
        Yes, why on the cover of the face of the Abama and not his w-pa?

        "And that face looks like"what sit down"on the porch". Chastushka.
      3. Sober
        Sober 12 November 2015 01: 51 New
        0
        Quote: arane
        Yes, why on the cover of the face of the Abama and not his w-pa?

        Yes, because no difference.
  16. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 11 November 2015 09: 28 New
    +2
    The fact that we will overcome this striped d-mo, you can not even doubt.
    Mattressoids, remember - if you climb up - it doesn’t seem like much, this is where America with Britosia will end its existence. God forbid the arrogant Saxon boot will come to our land! Then the living NATO will envy the dead!
    So you want to survive - sit modestly and do not show off. And do not say that you were not warned.

    Another thing is that these insignificants will try to bite us with the wrong hands, as usual.
    But there are no fools - no matter whom you set off - the answer will fly to you.
  17. Sochi
    Sochi 11 November 2015 09: 31 New
    +4
    Adomanis ... priebolt, apparently, nothing like this can be eradicated. He analyzed it ... sucked it out of the middle finger. He is not interested in the real possibilities of armament, the spirit of the armies does not take into account. I do not mean that the Americans are weak or strong - this is only found out in a real war, but because his analysis is NULL. "Analyteg" ...
  18. Victor62ru
    Victor62ru 11 November 2015 09: 32 New
    +3
    The mind cannot understand Russia with a common arshin not measure ...

    F.I. Tyutchev
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. bugrovata
    bugrovata 11 November 2015 09: 35 New
    0
    I think that at such a pace of escalation of the confrontation - we are waiting for a war in 2017 or 2018. am angry
    I’ll immediately go to work as a hospital attendant. soldier
    1. Stelth1985
      Stelth1985 11 November 2015 12: 24 New
      +1
      Mmm. You start to figure out when. But it has long been known. And black is the last prezik of the united gang of aggressors.
  21. Belousov
    Belousov 11 November 2015 09: 35 New
    +1
    Hmm ... Well, besides Lavrov’s quote, there’s nothing to pick up ...
  22. Dr. Barmaley
    Dr. Barmaley 11 November 2015 09: 38 New
    +4
    Over the past decade and a half, the US Army spent approximately 10 times more on each soldier than the Russian army.


    Military spending is, of course, a very "significant" indicator of the combat readiness of troops. Saudi Arabia spends almost as much as Russia ($ 80 billion), but its army is 10 times smaller, and it has no nuclear weapons. This means that Saud spends 10 times more money for each of their servants. Does this mean that every Arab is ten times stronger than a Russian? How are the Saudis fighting there in Yemen?
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 11 November 2015 10: 05 New
      +4
      Quote: Dr. Barmaley
      How are the Saudis fighting in Yemen?


      Yes, as they fight, such and the results have, and even Hussites HAVE them ...
  23. Kolka82
    Kolka82 11 November 2015 09: 38 New
    +8
    in order to achieve new combat capabilities that “at least remotely resemble” the capabilities of the US Army, “corrupt and incompetent Russians” would have to introduce a kind of sophisticated technique that would suddenly “increase the combat power” of the armed forces.
    lol
  24. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 11 November 2015 09: 42 New
    10
    You know, guys! Already so I want to really kick the ass of these idiots and supermen to shut up once and for all! Remember how Chapaev used to say: "Psychic? Damn it, let's get psychic!" These blockheads only wag their tongues. There was a case, we had to fight with them (drunk), so our boatswain (a meter with a cap), with one blow from below, put a two-meter bruiser on the ass ... It all ended very quickly. "Brave men" for their nothing and dumped ...
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 11 November 2015 10: 18 New
      +1
      Quote: MATROSKIN-53
      as Chapaev used to say: "Psychic? Damn it, let's psychic!"

      In reality, the Izhevsk workers, and not the cinematic "whites", went to that attack. They just had no bullets.
    2. maikl50jrij
      maikl50jrij 11 November 2015 10: 27 New
      +1
      Well done against the sheep, but against the well-done sheep himself! wink
  25. veksha50
    veksha50 11 November 2015 09: 43 New
    +7
    " US spends ten times more money on army than Kremlin"...

    Hmm ... Firstly, Russia does not have as many bases scattered around the world ...

    Secondly, our soldiers and officers are accustomed to warfare without warm toilets and other comfortable opportunities ...

    And thirdly, Putin has already told you that we will find a cheaper, but adequate answer to your efforts ...
  26. Tusv
    Tusv 11 November 2015 09: 43 New
    +2
    Is the budget 10 times bigger and immediately 10 times stronger than the opportunity? It would be necessary to double it again. Then talk about excellence
  27. Riv
    Riv 11 November 2015 09: 46 New
    10
    Well, actually, in comparison with the Soviet Army, the modern Russian one looks really bad. Looks weak, let's face it. Did they throw "calibers" around Muslims? Okay. And how many such launches would have taken place if we lived in the USSR? Did the "Armata" pass at the parade? Perfectly. And for Soviet tanks, the model name corresponded to the year of adoption. T-64, T-72, T-80 ... Every eight years - a new model. And then there were no Serdyukovs ...
    And the fact that there wasn’t enough vidiks at all ... Well, I have a player. I turn it on once a month, for guests, to see the old comedy.
    1. Stelth1985
      Stelth1985 11 November 2015 12: 27 New
      0
      Precisely noticed, colleague laughing !
  28. solovey
    solovey 11 November 2015 09: 50 New
    +1
    They need to say something !!! But we will act.
  29. Mercenary
    Mercenary 11 November 2015 09: 53 New
    +1
    "The President starred for the cover of OUT magazine. The buggers of the progressive Western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!""
    In fact, the wrong angle for such a magazine, if the frame was removed from behind and without palm leaves the view would have been the same laughing
  30. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 11 November 2015 09: 56 New
    +2
    Defeat the Russians? No problem!
    The only question is how? Who becomes the person of the Year, and who is the "icon" of the LGBT. There are no options for defeating Us.
  31. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 11 November 2015 09: 56 New
    +1
    Defeat the Russians? No problem!
    The only question is how? Who becomes the person of the Year, and who is the "icon" of the LGBT. There are no options for defeating Us.
  32. Batia
    Batia 11 November 2015 10: 03 New
    +3
    Most of my service was in the SA. There is nostalgia. Yes, we are able to survive and fight in any conditions of the situation and I think this property has remained in modern warriors. I often communicate with young people in uniform. No decadent sentiments. And one sergeant (cadet VVshnik) said to me, "Yes, we will fight one can of canned meat in a platoon for a week and we will not die." This is good news.
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Vladimir Pozlnyakov 11 November 2015 10: 25 New
      0
      And give us diapers, toothpicks, toilet paper and chewing gum with xylitol in dry rations to the US "seals"!
  33. Stinger
    Stinger 11 November 2015 10: 07 New
    +2
    top news in the West - Barack Obama's photo shoot for a pederast magazine


    This is news to them. And for readers of this progressive magazine - an ordinary event. His on the board and that's it.
  34. aleks.29ru
    aleks.29ru 11 November 2015 10: 11 New
    +1
    ** Cancer Obama is the most "desirable" president.
  35. Watchdog
    Watchdog 11 November 2015 10: 11 New
    +1
    So it's clear what I want to say ... After all, we were openly declared an enemy, and we did not demand an explanation from the BAT, did not withdraw from military treaties, it is clear that in our country the opinion of "the only bearer of sovereignty and source of power" is not particularly taken into account, but I would like to know at least what steps are being taken in what directions. Not the Stone Age, after all, not serfdom. It is clear that some of the strategic plans are classified. But part of that can be opened. Or is the electoral support completely unnecessary?
  36. fotopavka
    fotopavka 11 November 2015 10: 20 New
    +1
    What ambitious PI. Darasy nowadays go! They want to rule the world, they already have a president!
  37. RUSOIVAN
    RUSOIVAN 11 November 2015 10: 24 New
    0
    Now he will still receive the title of "the most influential gay man in the world" (since he has not pulled on the most influential person (as he spoke ambiguously :))) and will put out his analfire. This will be remembered as president.
  38. sannych
    sannych 11 November 2015 10: 25 New
    +4
    We all understand that Obama is a screen, a doll, whatever you want to call it. So he is engaged in all kinds of lewdness. America and the world are ruled by completely different people. Yes, this whole Western system of "democracy" and liberalism is essentially a system of managing a crowd of stupid consumers and extracting resources, power, influence.
  39. 71rus
    71rus 11 November 2015 10: 30 New
    0
    The buggers of the progressive western world are now chanting: “Our president! Ally! Hero! Icon!"

    Do not touch, "progressive homosexuals" of the Orthodox word ICON.
    Barack Obama advertises and promotes the Sodom sin, how it ended, I will cite the lines of Scripture:

    According to the text of the Bible, city dwellers were punished not only for sexual debauchery, but also for other sins, including selfishness, idleness, pride and others, but homosexuality was still recognized as the main one. Why this particular sin is recognized as the most terrible is not known for certain, but in the Bible it is called “an abomination” before the Lord, and the legend calls people “not to go to bed with a man like a woman”. - Read more on FB.ru: http://fb.ru/article/145085/
    sodom-i-gomorra-znachenie-frazeologizma-istoriya-i-bibleyskaya-legenda
  40. Eastern wind
    Eastern wind 11 November 2015 10: 41 New
    +5
    Gentlemen, does it not seem hypocritical to you to swear an oath of allegiance, holding your hand on the "politically incorrect" Bible, which condemns sodomy, and then promoting yourself in a pederast magazine? No, after all, I am impenetrably patriarchal and provincial ...
    1. Watchdog
      Watchdog 11 November 2015 16: 05 New
      0
      So during his inauguration, he and the Bible seem to have had the biggest problems ?!
      yes
  41. marinier
    marinier 11 November 2015 10: 42 New
    11
    Good time of the day, yep!
    With your permission, I would like to immediately make a difference as in my country
    Vidiat RUSSIAN ARMU.
    In our understanding, we have never drunk on our laurels. Europe has experienced more than once
    the so-called weakness of RUSSIA! G-yes, Europe does not have anecdotal and did not, na4inaia
    from the end of the 2-world.
    Enough! Enough! We are examples of "WEAK RUSSIA"!
    Who does not have enough examples of raking stars from RUSSIA, it’s not for us!
    It’s at a nearby station whom God had mercy on or who lacks examples
    from the story of how RUSSIA evacuates uninvited guests, and even stars in
    in the form of hotels on the road will collect, so that the taste of hospitality for a long time is not
    forgotten.
    Somewhere I can for a second ponyat kop4enogo-Lucifer
    (Forbes offended), ambitions not realized (worst rating, for the whole post-war
    a story among presidents.
    Yeah! Not even for a second, the sober-minded ludi in the west did not doubt the mosh
    RUSSIA! We never doubted that we were living in the east, in the event of a conflict.
    And if hormones pounced on someone, we sent the opinion of Bismarck
    memoirs of French officers, and finally notes of soldiers and officers of the Wehrmacht !!!
  42. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 11 November 2015 11: 06 New
    +1
    The status of prisoners in a zone is determined by tattoos,
    and the status of politicians is on the cover of magazines.
    Well, Obama had to acquire such a status, voluntarily.
  43. Gardamir
    Gardamir 11 November 2015 11: 07 New
    +1
    You all seriously think. What should be proud of the first place of the president of Russia in the hostile Forbes magazine? Didn’t you all say a year ago that if we are scolded, then we are doing everything right. And now the West is constantly praising the Russian government, the head of the central bank has already been awarded twice.
  44. JonnyT
    JonnyT 11 November 2015 11: 11 New
    0
    Of course, they are touched by American forecasts and statements)))) where are they going to our army, if even in the dashing 90 they couldn’t cope with it
  45. Svetlana
    Svetlana 11 November 2015 11: 15 New
    +5
    There was one color character - a blue puppy. And now a blue monkey has appeared.
    All these cries about the Russian threat have always been needed exclusively to increase the volume of military funding. It was always good for someone to make money on it. And it is unlikely that someone in their right mind would dare to fight with Russia, to measure their strength with a nuclear power. They are trying to torment us in completely different ways, for this we have been replaced with all the concepts of morality, culture, spiritual health, slipped us another story of ours that is far from real, we are trying before our eyes, and in many ways it turns out, to change even a new story, that whose witnesses are still alive. For this, the Slavic peoples and neighboring Slavic peoples are pitted so that we ourselves will destroy each other. For this, Satanism is popularized in all its manifestations, from the use of all kinds of poison to homosexuality. For this, education and healthcare are being destroyed. In our country, forces are clearly and secretly operating, all of which are introducing into life. And if we do not resist this, but, as obedient sheep, we will conduct all wiring such as there were no Panfilov in our history, Stalin was a tyrant, the Russians are backward barbaric people, our economy has become more stable from the actions of the central bank ... and others, others, then we will eventually disappear without any wars. The population is declining, the birth rate in our country is only due to prolific migrants from Central Asia. The standard of living of the bulk of the country's inhabitants is only falling. It becomes difficult even for medium and large businesses, and they inspire us that everything is going according to the ingenious ingenious plan for overcoming the crisis. What kind of war? Who needs to take risks? Look, you’ve already dealt with Europe, we’ll have to tinker with us longer, we are stronger, more stable, there are more of us, but this does not stop them, everything goes as usual for them.
  46. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 11 November 2015 11: 17 New
    +3
    One could also joke by saying that the biggest danger in the world comes from greenhouse gases, syphilis and the USA!
  47. cap
    cap 11 November 2015 11: 23 New
    0
    OBAMA SHOULD TIP CHANGE FLAG.
    ON WHICH ALREADY DO NOT NEED TO THINK.
    WILL EXACTLY HISTORY.
    IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO RIDE TO ARABS. SO PRESIDENCE IS ALREADY FOR A LONG TIME.
    WAIT.
  48. hotrod
    hotrod 11 November 2015 11: 28 New
    0
    The confrontation between the two superpowers is growing. This means only one thing - there are too few resources for the existence of both. And this means that you need to increase your own efficiency and bite a clumsy monster where possible. The cost of a fighter is 10 times higher - just an example of US inefficiency.
    It is possible to increase the effectiveness of our country not only in the military department. The diplomatic corps and media resources (RT) are also now involved in a hybrid war. Here, Russia’s situation is much better than that of the United States, since it’s much easier to catch our monster on lies and inconsistencies. Well, the president will tell us how to chop off :)
  49. Lelek
    Lelek 11 November 2015 11: 56 New
    +2
    (The president starred for the cover of OUT magazine.)

    And he did it in different poses, which by no means pull on the "icon", except for the magazine "ERALASH":
    1. science fiction writer
      science fiction writer 11 November 2015 12: 58 New
      +1
      The president has starred for the cover of OUT magazine.

      Not well, this is how you need to be a woodpecker in order to voluntarily identify yourself in a cock's corner
      Yes, and where did he take the impudence after that to crow.
    2. Apsit
      Apsit 11 November 2015 13: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: Lelek
      well, they do not pull at the "icon", except for the magazine "ERALASH":
      Well, Yeralash offended. And why not pull on the icon? In my opinion, even pulls to become an icon for the faint of heart. Everything in the world is natural and this prezz has found its place. Amen.
  50. 1536
    1536 11 November 2015 11: 57 New
    +2
    The Russians can be defeated by once again causing confusion in our country. To do this, go along the knurled one. They are shaking society in all ways. Some "free historians", "writers-helicopters-channels", rogues from the media, paid showmen / women both in capitals and in the field have intensified this work. If you look carefully, you can see it with the naked eye in every city: where sectarians are standing with their waste paper, where a new museum of the history of American cowboys has opened, where something else is hammered in on a starry-striped peg. Apparently, this luminary of destabilization of countries is coordinated by the "permanent" revolutionary and also the US Ambassador, working off his salary and assimilating the money allocated by the American Congress. And without realizing that Russia is thus declared a war of survival, much can be missed.
    They will ask how to deal with it. Well, firstlywhile listening to enemy propaganda, rub to your nose, do your own thing and think, drawing conclusions that these talkers are lying, because they can not lie - "consolidated", Secondly, legislators must provide local internal affairs bodies on the ground with the ability to suppress antics of individual citizens hostile to the state, to respond to reports of all these "antics" and actions of the so-called "opposition", third, be vigilant and do not let yourself be fooled (from the account already lost) many times. Without this, "Perestroika 2.0" is guaranteed to us in the years 22-24.