Military Review

Only three training aircraft for training astronauts are suitable for flight.

40
Only a third of the training planes of the Cosmonaut Training Center, designed for piloting training, are suitable for flying, reports MIC with reference to the head of the Center Yuri Lonchakov.


Only three training aircraft for training astronauts are suitable for flight.


“The L-39 aircraft we have is a fairly large number, ten aircraft. Of them in the ranks of three. This year, we hope, two more planes will be commissioned, ”said Lonchakov, speaking at the conference“ Manned space flights ”.

L-39 - combat training aircraft, produced before 1999, in Czechoslovakia. It was the main training machine for pilots of the Warsaw Pact countries. All of them were released about 3-x thousand units. Still remain in service with many states.
Photos used:
http://www.yaplakal.com/
40 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech
    Same lech 11 November 2015 08: 19 New
    +2
    L-39 - combat training aircraft, produced before 1999 in Czechoslovakia.


    Wow ... the old man still flies, and the Czechs produce spare parts for them?
    1. Edvagan
      Edvagan 11 November 2015 09: 02 New
      +1
      срочную в 1987 служил техником на "Альбатросе" (Л-39) )))) Вспоминаю машинку, в строю еще ,оказывается))
      1. Tor5
        Tor5 11 November 2015 09: 31 New
        +1
        Despite the age - the machine is very reliable.
    2. Maxom75
      Maxom75 11 November 2015 09: 35 New
      +1
      our plant belongs, but why is it still the Czech Republic? (((
    3. Buffalo
      Buffalo 11 November 2015 13: 27 New
      0
      No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!
      I dealt with this problem about fifteen years ago.
      There was an acute problem of import substitution for L-39.
      There were no components and there was no one to repair. Then the repair slowly mastered the Krasnodar ARZ.
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 11 November 2015 13: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: Bison
        No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!

        Производство L-39, вернее его более "продвинутых" вариантов L-59 и L-159 прекращено в 1999 году. Никаких препятствий для поставок "элок" до недавнего времени не было. Более того чехи сами неоднократно настойчиво это предлагали.
        1. Buffalo
          Buffalo 11 November 2015 13: 35 New
          0
          We are not talking about airplanes. - It's about spare parts for them.
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 11 November 2015 13: 57 New
            +1
            Quote: Bison
            No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!

            Where is it about spare parts? what However, spare parts are also not a problem, they are in abundance in warehouses. In any case, in the USA, several dozen L-39 of various modifications were restored. There would be money and desire ...
            1. vladimirZ
              vladimirZ 11 November 2015 17: 08 New
              0
              Yes, the L-39 training jet is being completed at all schools, and now at the Cosmonaut Training Center.
              But our aircraft industry is preparing to replace him with a new training aircraft, a piston Yak-152. laughing
              Это ничего, что Як-152 будет морально устаревшей машиной, по сравнению, с тем же "старичком" реактивным L-39, главное, что они будут новые, с завода, с большим летным ресурсом. laughing
              But in general it’s bitter, for so many years, not to develop your own Russian jet, single-engine, economical training aircraft, which once again confirms the lack of proper order in our aviation industry, in the aircraft ordering system.
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 November 2015 08: 22 New
    23
    ten planes. Of these, three are in service.

    A strange situation for the Cosmonaut Training Center. Logically, everything should be all right with the Matbase. The question immediately arises, why the head of the Center did not take measures to eliminate this misunderstanding (you cannot call it another way). And if you tried to accept, then who exactly at the top sabotaged this?
    1. ivan bogomolov
      ivan bogomolov 11 November 2015 08: 38 New
      0
      Напрашивается другой вопрос,как сказал наш ВВП "А,ГДЕ ДЕНЬГИ")))))
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 11 November 2015 08: 47 New
        +6
        ,как сказал наш ВВП "А,ГДЕ ДЕНЬГИ")))))

        You need to steal less. How to poke grandmother with the construction of the spaceport, so the master.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 11 November 2015 10: 39 New
          0
          Yes, these are trifles in comparison with how much our budget receives less money from not paying taxes.
  3. cniza
    cniza 11 November 2015 08: 24 New
    11
    А где же наши Яки ? Какая то "куцая" информация , как не законченная пьеса.
  4. Bongo
    Bongo 11 November 2015 08: 25 New
    +6
    Still remain in service with many states.

    Not only that, they are very numerous in private hands. They are especially popular in the USA. There even exist companies that specialize in the restoration and repair of Czechoslovakian TCBs.
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 11 November 2015 08: 28 New
    +1
    small bullshit, stuffing according to the principle of OBS.
  6. Bugor
    Bugor 11 November 2015 08: 29 New
    +5
    Three on flights, three on maintenance, four on refurbishment. Nothing wrong. Are we preparing cosmonauts with battalions?
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 11 November 2015 08: 41 New
      +8
      Do not shoot the office !!! Not for nothing that the Air Force was renamed into the Air Forces, soon the Airborne Forces will be renamed into KDV! laughing
      But in general, really, it is strange - dozens of Yak-130 aliens do not allow to buy? request
      PS Yuzat, in the current conditions, NATO aircraft is a bad man, and the Czechs with spare parts will certainly not miss the sanction case!
  7. solovey
    solovey 11 November 2015 08: 30 New
    +2
    It's time to move on the Yak130 !!!
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 11 November 2015 08: 39 New
      +3
      Quote: solovey
      It's time to move on the Yak130 !!!

      What for? What is the difference on what to pilot?
      1. Corsair0304
        Corsair0304 11 November 2015 12: 14 New
        0
        Quote: GRAY
        What for? What is the difference on what to pilot?


        Then what's ours and newer. Than the Czechs to feed, so it’s better to raise the Yak.
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 11 November 2015 13: 04 New
          0
          Quote: Corsair0304
          Then what's ours and newer. Than the Czechs to feed, so it’s better to raise the Yak.

          When the 39th finally turn into garbage cans, then they will change it. The resource is not infinite.
  8. Hubun
    Hubun 11 November 2015 08: 34 New
    +1
    somehow, against the background of information about new planes and ships, it’s sad, as if not from our country, news
  9. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 11 November 2015 08: 36 New
    0
    I do not see anything critical.

    "Як-130 (по классификации НАТО: Mitten – рукавица) – учебно-боевой самолет УБС созданный в ОКБ им. Яковлева в сотрудничестве с итальянской компанией Aermacchi. Самолет предназначен для замены в ВВС России устаревших учебно-тренировочных самолетов L-39. В процессе разработки совместная работа с итальянцами была приостановлена из-за разногласий и каждая из фирм реализовали свою концепцию самостоятельно. Як-130 стал первым самолетом, который был полностью новой разработкой (а не модернизацией существующих машин) созданной в России после распада СССР."
    "Серийный выпуск основного варианта - L-39C Albatros - начался в 1973 году"
    41 years old L-39 in the sky! It’s time to rest. There will be a planned replacement for our aircraft. And that’s all.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 11 November 2015 12: 10 New
      +1
      I swear I don’t understand the minus signers! Not that I was worried about the rating - not at all.
      I just think that if you do not agree with the opinion, put a minus - argue the answer!

      P.S. практически у всех, кто ратует в комментах к данной статье за переход ан Як-130 стояли "минуса". Меня терзают смутные сомнения....
  10. VseDoFeNi
    VseDoFeNi 11 November 2015 08: 37 New
    -4
    There is no place for such things in VO.
  11. Wedmak
    Wedmak 11 November 2015 08: 41 New
    0
    But in principle, if you think about it, you need more? Although of course, I would like to see the brand new Yak-130. These same planes are used to prepare astronauts for overloads and that’s all?
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 11 November 2015 08: 44 New
      +2
      Are airplanes used to prepare astronauts for overloads, is that all?

      No, the main goal is piloting.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 11 November 2015 08: 48 New
        0
        No, the main goal is piloting.

        Piloting what? Cosmonauts need to know how L-39 is controlled? What for?
        1. V.ic
          V.ic 11 November 2015 09: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: Wedmak
          Do astronauts need to know how L-39 is controlled? What for?

          Не "космонавтам", а pilotsto the astronauts!
        2. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 11 November 2015 11: 10 New
          0
          For Wedmak
          And you do not know that those undergoing training and not previously related to the flight profession, undergo training under the pilot program?
  12. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 11 November 2015 08: 42 New
    0
    Quote: Bugor
    Three on flights, three on maintenance, four on refurbishment. Nothing wrong. Are we preparing cosmonauts with battalions?


    The article causes distrust - what, astronauts on IT still fly? No doubt, the device is not bad. It was once. Waiting for the air to fall apart? And we will start URGENT measures to take ...
  13. mpzss
    mpzss 11 November 2015 08: 48 New
    +2
    here it should be considered, just if at this stage it is cheaper to restore, then it is necessary to restore L-39, but provided that they are replaced with our Yak. Moreover, the planned replacement, that is, gradually, the budget is not rubber!
  14. ICT
    ICT 11 November 2015 08: 57 New
    +1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    A strange situation for the Cosmonaut Training Center. Logically, everything should be all right with the Matbase.

    I don’t know how it is now, but in the dashing 90, the space regiment did not need anything, neither kerosene, nor spare parts, and they paid their salary month after month.
  15. Manul
    Manul 11 November 2015 09: 15 New
    +1
    So maybe the Cosmonaut Training Center is so unobtrusive and hints to the top-level management and ministries - but do you want to give a denyuzhku to the Yak-130? lol
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 11 November 2015 13: 33 New
      0
      Quote: Manul
      So maybe the Cosmonaut Training Center is so unobtrusive and hints to the top-level management and ministries - but do you want to give a denyuzhku to the Yak-130?

      They have a katsmanavt-chevalier-banker Leonov there, let him take care of his colleagues!
  16. afrikanez
    afrikanez 11 November 2015 10: 26 New
    -1
    And who is to blame? Of course, the leadership of the center, who else. Everyone loves to get money, but you can’t force anyone to do business. negative
  17. Signaller
    Signaller 11 November 2015 10: 54 New
    0
    Yes, just not enough for everything. And they, too, may not launch all their plans. After all, even recently they wrote about Star City and what fraud the administration is doing there. Three years ago, they upgraded their food for a new centrifuge. so they waited more than a year to pay. So everywhere is hard now. They have something flying, and then not bad. Good luck to them.
  18. Prisoner
    Prisoner 11 November 2015 11: 18 New
    -1
    А на фига космонавтам самолет? Что "Буран" запускать собираются? what
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 11 November 2015 11: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: Captive
      А на фига космонавтам самолет? Что "Буран" запускать собираются? what

      Straight from Gorky Park! They are waiting for the Moscow river to freeze! wassat
      Aircraft, like pilots, in astronautics, are more likely a tribute to tradition - with modern orbital stations and duration of stay, more divers are suitable! wink
      IMHO
  19. Alexey Boukin
    Alexey Boukin 11 November 2015 11: 47 New
    +2
    Quote: SSI
    And our space is based on the residual principle, as, by the way, is much more ...

    Да по всему видно, что и живем мы по остаточному принципу, что наши чинуши "не доедят".
  20. babai591
    babai591 11 November 2015 12: 54 New
    0
    Who can briefly highlight the methodology for training astronauts?
  21. Freelancer7
    Freelancer7 11 November 2015 14: 37 New
    0
    The liberal press makes uncertain precautious posts on topvar. The topic is simply not serious, in Kushchevka these albatrosses do not fly measuredly, so all this is crap on a stick. I see only one goal - the authors want to say that everything is bad.
  22. Evgeny RS
    Evgeny RS 12 November 2015 22: 12 New
    0
    Quote: vladimirZ
    But in general it’s bitter, for so many years, not to develop your own Russian jet, single-engine, economical training aircraft, which once again confirms the lack of proper order in our aviation industry, in the aircraft ordering system.
    Have you forgotten about the Yak-130?))