Only three training aircraft for training astronauts are suitable for flight.

40
Only a third of the training planes of the Cosmonaut Training Center, designed for piloting training, are suitable for flying, reports MIC with reference to the head of the Center Yuri Lonchakov.

Only three training aircraft for training astronauts are suitable for flight.


“The L-39 aircraft we have is a fairly large number, ten aircraft. Of them in the ranks of three. This year, we hope, two more planes will be commissioned, ”said Lonchakov, speaking at the conference“ Manned space flights ”.

L-39 - combat training aircraft, produced before 1999, in Czechoslovakia. It was the main training machine for pilots of the Warsaw Pact countries. All of them were released about 3-x thousand units. Still remain in service with many states.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech Rank
    Same lech
    +2
    11 November 2015 08: 19
    L-39 - combat training aircraft, produced before 1999 in Czechoslovakia.


    Wow ... the old man still flies, and the Czechs produce spare parts for them?
    1. Edvagan Rank
      Edvagan
      +1
      11 November 2015 09: 02
      urgent in 1987 served as a technician on the Albatross (L-39))))) I remember the machine, it turns out that it is still in service))
      1. Tor5
        Tor5
        +1
        11 November 2015 09: 31
        Despite the age - the machine is very reliable.
    2. Maxom75 Rank
      Maxom75
      +1
      11 November 2015 09: 35
      our plant belongs, but why is it still the Czech Republic? (((
    3. Buffalo Rank
      Buffalo
      0
      11 November 2015 13: 27
      No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!
      I dealt with this problem about fifteen years ago.
      There was an acute problem of import substitution for L-39.
      There were no components and there was no one to repair. Then the repair slowly mastered the Krasnodar ARZ.
      1. Bongo Rank
        Bongo
        +1
        11 November 2015 13: 31
        Quote: Bison
        No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!

        Production of the L-39, or rather its more "advanced" versions of the L-59 and L-159, was discontinued in 1999. Until recently, there were no obstacles to the supply of Elok. Moreover, the Czechs themselves have repeatedly and persistently suggested it.
        1. Buffalo Rank
          Buffalo
          0
          11 November 2015 13: 35
          We are not talking about airplanes. - It's about spare parts for them.
          1. Bongo Rank
            Bongo
            +1
            11 November 2015 13: 57
            Quote: Bison
            No, they can, and release, but they do not deliver to us ... - NATO!

            Where is it about spare parts? what However, spare parts are also not a problem, they are in abundance in warehouses. In any case, in the USA, several dozen L-39 of various modifications were restored. There would be money and desire ...
            1. vladimirZ Rank
              vladimirZ
              0
              11 November 2015 17: 08
              Yes, the L-39 training jet is being completed at all schools, and now at the Cosmonaut Training Center.
              But our aircraft industry is preparing to replace him with a new training aircraft, a piston Yak-152. laughing
              It's nothing that the Yak-152 will be an obsolete machine, in comparison with the same "old man" jet L-39, the main thing is that they will be new, from the factory, with a large flight resource. laughing
              But in general it’s bitter, for so many years, not to develop your own Russian jet, single-engine, economical training aircraft, which once again confirms the lack of proper order in our aviation industry, in the aircraft ordering system.
  2. rotmistr60 Rank
    rotmistr60
    +23
    11 November 2015 08: 22
    ten planes. Of these, three are in service.

    A strange situation for the Cosmonaut Training Center. Logically, everything should be all right with the Matbase. The question immediately arises, why the head of the Center did not take measures to eliminate this misunderstanding (you cannot call it another way). And if you tried to accept, then who exactly at the top sabotaged this?
    1. ivan bogomolov Rank
      ivan bogomolov
      0
      11 November 2015 08: 38
      Another question suggests itself, as our GDP said "WHERE IS THE MONEY")))))
      1. Wedmak Rank
        Wedmak
        +6
        11 November 2015 08: 47
        , as our GDP said "WHERE IS THE MONEY")))))

        You need to steal less. How to poke grandmother with the construction of the spaceport, so the master.
        1. Vadim237 Rank
          Vadim237
          0
          11 November 2015 10: 39
          Yes, these are trifles in comparison with how much our budget receives less money from not paying taxes.
  3. cniza Rank
    cniza
    +11
    11 November 2015 08: 24
    And where are our Yaks? Some kind of "scanty" information, if not a finished play.
  4. Bongo Rank
    Bongo
    +6
    11 November 2015 08: 25
    Still remain in service with many states.

    Not only that, they are very numerous in private hands. They are especially popular in the USA. There even exist companies that specialize in the restoration and repair of Czechoslovakian TCBs.
  5. Andrey Yuryevich Rank
    Andrey Yuryevich
    +1
    11 November 2015 08: 28
    small bullshit, stuffing according to the principle of OBS.
  6. Bugor Rank
    Bugor
    +5
    11 November 2015 08: 29
    Three on flights, three on maintenance, four on refurbishment. Nothing wrong. Are we preparing cosmonauts with battalions?
    1. engineer74 Rank
      engineer74
      +8
      11 November 2015 08: 41
      Do not shoot the office !!! Not for nothing that the Air Force was renamed into the Air Forces, soon the Airborne Forces will be renamed into KDV! laughing
      But in general, really, it is strange - dozens of Yak-130 aliens do not allow to buy? request
      PS Yuzat, in the current conditions, NATO aircraft is a bad man, and the Czechs with spare parts will certainly not miss the sanction case!
  7. solovey Rank
    solovey
    +2
    11 November 2015 08: 30
    It's time to move on the Yak130 !!!
    1. GRAY Rank
      GRAY
      +3
      11 November 2015 08: 39
      Quote: solovey
      It's time to move on the Yak130 !!!

      What for? What is the difference on what to pilot?
      1. Corsair0304 Rank
        Corsair0304
        0
        11 November 2015 12: 14
        Quote: GRAY
        What for? What is the difference on what to pilot?


        Then what's ours and newer. Than the Czechs to feed, so it’s better to raise the Yak.
        1. GRAY Rank
          GRAY
          0
          11 November 2015 13: 04
          Quote: Corsair0304
          Then what's ours and newer. Than the Czechs to feed, so it’s better to raise the Yak.

          When the 39th finally turn into garbage cans, then they will change it. The resource is not infinite.
  8. Hubun Rank
    Hubun
    +1
    11 November 2015 08: 34
    somehow, against the background of information about new planes and ships, it’s sad, as if not from our country, news
  9. Corsair0304 Rank
    Corsair0304
    0
    11 November 2015 08: 36
    I do not see anything critical.

    "Yak-130 (NATO classification: Mitten - mitten) is an UBS combat training aircraft created at the Yakovlev Design Bureau in cooperation with the Italian company Aermacchi. The aircraft is intended to replace the outdated L-39 training aircraft in the Russian Air Force. In the process development, joint work with the Italians was suspended due to disagreements and each of the firms implemented their concept independently. The Yak-130 became the first aircraft, which was a completely new development (and not modernization of existing machines) created in Russia after the collapse of the USSR. "
    "Serial production of the main variant - L-39C Albatros - began in 1973"
    41 years old L-39 in the sky! It’s time to rest. There will be a planned replacement for our aircraft. And that’s all.
    1. Corsair0304 Rank
      Corsair0304
      +1
      11 November 2015 12: 10
      I swear I don’t understand the minus signers! Not that I was worried about the rating - not at all.
      I just think that if you do not agree with the opinion, put a minus - argue the answer!

      PS almost everyone who advocates in the comments to this article for the transition to the Yak-130 were "minus". I am plagued by vague doubts ...
  10. VseDoFeNi Rank
    VseDoFeNi
    -4
    11 November 2015 08: 37
    There is no place for such things in VO.
  11. Wedmak Rank
    Wedmak
    0
    11 November 2015 08: 41
    But in principle, if you think about it, you need more? Although of course, I would like to see the brand new Yak-130. These same planes are used to prepare astronauts for overloads and that’s all?
    1. rotmistr60 Rank
      rotmistr60
      +2
      11 November 2015 08: 44
      Are airplanes used to prepare astronauts for overloads, is that all?

      No, the main goal is piloting.
      1. Wedmak Rank
        Wedmak
        0
        11 November 2015 08: 48
        No, the main goal is piloting.

        Piloting what? Cosmonauts need to know how L-39 is controlled? What for?
        1. V.ic Rank
          V.ic
          +1
          11 November 2015 09: 55
          Quote: Wedmak
          Do astronauts need to know how L-39 is controlled? What for?

          Not to "astronauts", but pilotsto the astronauts!
        2. rotmistr60 Rank
          rotmistr60
          0
          11 November 2015 11: 10
          For Wedmak
          And you do not know that those undergoing training and not previously related to the flight profession, undergo training under the pilot program?
  12. iliitchitch Rank
    iliitchitch
    0
    11 November 2015 08: 42
    Quote: Bugor
    Three on flights, three on maintenance, four on refurbishment. Nothing wrong. Are we preparing cosmonauts with battalions?


    The article causes distrust - what, astronauts on IT still fly? No doubt, the device is not bad. It was once. Waiting for the air to fall apart? And we will start URGENT measures to take ...
  13. mpzss Rank
    mpzss
    +2
    11 November 2015 08: 48
    here it should be considered, just if at this stage it is cheaper to restore, then it is necessary to restore L-39, but provided that they are replaced with our Yak. Moreover, the planned replacement, that is, gradually, the budget is not rubber!
  14. ICT Rank
    ICT
    +1
    11 November 2015 08: 57
    Quote: rotmistr60
    A strange situation for the Cosmonaut Training Center. Logically, everything should be all right with the Matbase.

    I don’t know how it is now, but in the dashing 90, the space regiment did not need anything, neither kerosene, nor spare parts, and they paid their salary month after month.
  15. Manul Rank
    Manul
    +1
    11 November 2015 09: 15
    So maybe the Cosmonaut Training Center is so unobtrusive and hints to the top-level management and ministries - but do you want to give a denyuzhku to the Yak-130? lol
    1. Buffalo Rank
      Buffalo
      0
      11 November 2015 13: 33
      Quote: Manul
      So maybe the Cosmonaut Training Center is so unobtrusive and hints to the top-level management and ministries - but do you want to give a denyuzhku to the Yak-130?

      They have a katsmanavt-chevalier-banker Leonov there, let him take care of his colleagues!
  16. afrikanez Rank
    afrikanez
    -1
    11 November 2015 10: 26
    And who is to blame? Of course, the leadership of the center, who else. Everyone loves to get money, but you can’t force anyone to do business. negative
  17. Signaller Rank
    Signaller
    0
    11 November 2015 10: 54
    Yes, just not enough for everything. And they, too, may not launch all their plans. After all, even recently they wrote about Star City and what fraud the administration is doing there. Three years ago, they upgraded their food for a new centrifuge. so they waited more than a year to pay. So everywhere is hard now. They have something flying, and then not bad. Good luck to them.
  18. Prisoner Rank
    Prisoner
    -1
    11 November 2015 11: 18
    And what about a plane for astronauts? What "Buran" are going to launch? what
    1. engineer74 Rank
      engineer74
      +2
      11 November 2015 11: 44
      Quote: Captive
      And what about a plane for astronauts? What "Buran" are going to launch? what

      Straight from Gorky Park! They are waiting for the Moscow river to freeze! wassat
      Aircraft, like pilots, in astronautics, are more likely a tribute to tradition - with modern orbital stations and duration of stay, more divers are suitable! wink
      IMHO
  19. Alexey Boukin Rank
    Alexey Boukin
    +2
    11 November 2015 11: 47
    Quote: SSI
    And our space is based on the residual principle, as, by the way, is much more ...

    Yes, it is evident that we live by the residual principle, that our bureaucrats "will not finish eating."
  20. babai591 Rank
    babai591
    0
    11 November 2015 12: 54
    Who can briefly highlight the methodology for training astronauts?
  21. Freelancer7 Rank
    Freelancer7
    0
    11 November 2015 14: 37
    The liberal press makes uncertain precautious posts on topvar. The topic is simply not serious, in Kushchevka these albatrosses do not fly measuredly, so all this is crap on a stick. I see only one goal - the authors want to say that everything is bad.
  22. Evgeny RS Rank
    Evgeny RS
    0
    12 November 2015 22: 12
    Quote: vladimirZ
    But in general it’s bitter, for so many years, not to develop your own Russian jet, single-engine, economical training aircraft, which once again confirms the lack of proper order in our aviation industry, in the aircraft ordering system.
    Have you forgotten about the Yak-130?))