Who in Russia suddenly became preoccupied with the "historical myths" about the Panfilovites, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya and the feat of Alexander Matrosov?

In the network, and not only in the network, the controversy is gaining momentum, which is difficult to ignore. If I may say so, network potentials once again found themselves on opposite sides of the barricades in their relation to historical science, historical events and the very description of history.
A controversy has been initiated by individuals who call themselves “free history” supporters. This is a liberal group, as they say, the creative intelligentsia, which decided to throw a kind of challenge to the well-established and seemingly quite traditional information about those or other periods of the existence of the Russian State (in its different configurations and with different names). What is the essence of the challenge? To understand this, you can refer, for example, to the September publication of the historian Sergei Mitrofanov on the pages "Free Press"titled "What is the Evil of a Patriotic Myth?"


Who in Russia suddenly became preoccupied with the "historical myths" about the Panfilovites, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya and the feat of Alexander Matrosov?


The reader, by clicking on the link above, you can get acquainted with the publication of Mr. Mitrofanov.

If you convey the essence of the publication, the historian (of course, from among the "free") tries to convey to the audience his thoughts that historical fiction, they say, should not be a place in modern historical science. The fact that any unproved episode of history must be removed from historical editions and publications, so that, you understand, do not mislead the younger generation. And in general, history, if you follow the logic of Mr. Mitrofanov and supporters of this same logic, is a science that must stand on the reinforced concrete support of archival data and the testimony of "witnesses" recorded by the "correct" historians.

As an example of what “the younger generation is misleading", the story of 28 Panfilovites who at the cost of their own lives stopped the advancement of German tanks near Moscow. From the publication:

Another unpleasant moment of this discussion is the ease with which the modern man in the street with the ribbon of St. George undertakes to sing the death of his fathers, as if it was the death by order of the command that was the apotheosis of military glory and a wonderful personal realization. Worst of all, he transfers this morality, including to the modern man, forming his militaristic attitude to the world and the agenda.

By the way, it is necessary to think that it was for this purpose that front correspondent Alexander Krivitsky composed an epic about 28 Panfilov’s fight with German tanks at the Dubosekovo junction, where they all died, but did not miss the enemy, for such was the political attitude. It doesn’t matter whether that episode of the war was in reality, wasn’t, but wherever the soldier was, from now on he would follow the example of Panfilov, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya, Alexander Matrosov without hesitation to die in the name of the regime and on the orders of their commanders. Not only not feeling fear, but also thanks to the fate of being able to distinguish themselves in this way and join the communist saints.


In general, it makes no sense to continue quoting, because the position of Mr. historian Mitrofanov and the presented fragment is clear. But, as modern youth says, the trick is that Mr. Mitrofanov, with his sizzling criticism of “historical mythology,” is far from being the only instance. In Russia, for some time, there is a whole team of “correct historians” who formed the so-called Free Historical Society, for which, forgive, for three miles, it carries “one rifle for three” and “two million German women raped by the Red Army” ... And all these gentlemen and ladies now they are in a position and they are trying to declare that a whole layer of national history is based not on documentary evidence, but on myths composed either by journalists, or “historians-commies”, or by someone else who is not hand-crafted for the liberal scoops. These same ladies and gentlemen are trying to expose themselves as such adepts of historical truth, who “know for sure” that “there was no feat by Alexander Matrosov”, that 28 panfilovtsy “did not die near Moscow”, that Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya’s heroism was “not proved by anyone”. Like, this is all historical mythology, which the “regime” has powdered and continues to powder the brains of the Soviet, and now the Russian, society. They say that we and only we tell you the truth, you can rely on us and only on us when studying our national history, and everything else is a lie, a scoop and a provocation.

Well ... Let us assume that historical science, as its liberal "partners" see it, is strictly archival documents and confirmed facts. Well ... Let the feat of 28 Panfilov near Moscow is an unproved fact. Well ... So, publishers will publish only facts, facts, facts, and based on archival materials, obtained by the light of a green lamp by the same historian Mitrofanov. Wonderful…

Here is just one question: why adherents of the theory of “debunking historical myths” by this term understand only those pages that are written by Russian historians of the Soviet period? Why shouldn't Mr. Mitrofanov take care of the alternative “myth-making”, if he and his supporters tend to call this phenomenon in historiography that way. Well, for example, why not start by dispelling the myth that the Allies really cared about the fate of the Soviet Union and the peoples of Europe enslaved by the Nazis, and that, you understand, it was precisely because of this that the Allies suddenly decided to think about opening a second front ... When a Soviet soldier died he stood near Moscow and in Stalingrad, for some reason the allies were not eager to open a second front, and then, when the fate of the Nazis was clear, immediately bam - sharply expressed concern for the USSR, the enslaved peoples of Europe, the meeting on the Elbe, fraternization, smiles, etc. Veta ... Unless disinterested aid of the West - is not a historical myth that all the post-war years the citizens are fed adherents of liberalism.

Why do not liberal truth seekers try to dispel the myth of the “General Frost,” who, you see, stopped the Nazis near Moscow? Why not answer those crazy publications of a western journalist who, through the press, “told the city and the world” that the Soviet soldiers in Europe 1945 were the only ones who were engaged in “robbing, killing and raping German women”? Why not strike the truth with the historical liberal myth that the “oppressed” Soviet citizens in a single rush in the course of the referendum spoke in favor of liquidating the USSR, and that the economies of the former Soviet republics afterwards showed the wonders of growth, and the republics themselves felt the breath of true freedom and democracy ...

Why do those who are on the other side of the barricades have “claims” exclusively to the Panfilovites, Alexander Matrosov and Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya - that is, who and what is one of the foundations of patriotism, the core of the ideology of self-sacrifice, fraternity and mutual assistance? Why, our liberal, forgive my God, "friends" simply can not open the cards and say that their task is not to squeeze the historical truth, but to once again dab the memory of Victory, the very principles of sacrifice Russian (in the broad sense of the word) people, their desire for unity before a common misfortune. In this regard, such persons can call themselves at least free historians, although advocates of historical truth and morality, but you can’t hide the inside, as they say. Forgive me generously, but it is painfully frank from such “champions” who break into Russophobia as soon as their mouth opens ...
Author:
Photos used:
www.opoccuu.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

235 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. anEkeName 11 November 2015 06: 57 New
    • 54
    • 0
    +54
    Why do those who are on the other side of the barricade have “claims” exclusively to Panfilov’s, Alexander Matrosov and Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya — that is, to whom and what is one of the foundations of patriotism, the core of the ideology of self-sacrifice, fraternity and mutual assistance?

    An obvious attempt by pseudo-liberoids to cut the historical roots of patriotism - the trunk on which sovereignty rests.
    1. oleg-gr 11 November 2015 07: 02 New
      • 52
      • 0
      +52
      Attempt No. ... to ruin the country from within. Candidates for "superintendents of perestroika" lined up in line. They are offended that their society does not support.
      1. Sirocco 11 November 2015 07: 49 New
        • 24
        • 0
        +24
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Attempt No. ... to ruin the country from within.

        You know, I noticed this trend in Odnokl. liberal propaganda is now underway, as everything is bad in the Russian Federation, salaries are falling, pensioners, medicine are being beaten by social programs in general, they say the authorities are not happy with them. So those who are over 60 years old, the pages of real people write a lot of comments, why would there be such a change?
        I understand that not everything is so smooth in our country, with the above, but being in a state of war, and now there is a war against us, many do not want to sacrifice goods, holidays abroad, and other delights. This is that egoism, or shortsightedness, of some of the masses.
        1. oracul 11 November 2015 08: 10 New
          • 19
          • 0
          +19
          I think that among the sixties there are not so many people sitting at computers. In general, computer polls are largely the opinion of a special stratum of people fenced off from the real world by a virtual one, in which it is warm and comfortable to have a personal opinion above all else, strain and think to nothing, if you read and take for granted the reflections of some kind of "authority" overshadowed by ranks and degrees and preoccupied only with breaking into, but rather getting into, a story.
          1. crazy_fencer 11 November 2015 11: 48 New
            • 25
            • 0
            +25
            Quote: oracul
            I think that among the sixties there are not so many people sitting at computers.


            As one good programmer said: "Do not generalize, but you will not be generalized." For example, I am 61, and a computer with the obligatory presence of the Internet is the main working tool. I am absolutely sure that this is by no means the only one. You better look at the younger generation. Of these, half of the "advanced users" in fact, know nothing but VKontakte and Facebook.
            1. guard 11 November 2015 19: 20 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              one might not have noticed these statements by freethinkers of grant-eaters, but I would like to draw attention to the fact that they act sequentially, first your chief archivist said that there was no feat of 28 Panfilov’s, they say there is no documentary evidence, and his position allows us to assume that he then yes knows! Moreover, all this is transmitted to the media as a sensation !!
              And now another figure appears, says a lot, leads into such jungles from which the fragile young brain can’t get out, and indirectly, not speaking directly, all this nonsense relies on the statements of that archival official.
              There is a systematic work (attack) of liberal circles on the common past of Soviet people and, most importantly, the victory over fascism, equating Stalin with Hitler, the purpose of which is to denigrate it so that there is no connecting, unifying factor for people living in such vast expanses i.e. former union !!!
              1. aba
                aba 11 November 2015 21: 47 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                Systematic work (attack) of liberal circles on the common past of Soviet people


                Only the blow is directed toward the future. If these supposedly “myths” are removed, then in the near future we have a society without a core, and it can be lowered for any ideological support.
                1. go21zd45few 13 November 2015 10: 21 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Everything is clear with the liberals. It is necessary to pay attention to school education where history and historical facts are either not considered at all or are considered in a distorted form. The school curriculum was laid down in the 90s under the editorship of the West. Next, on what films are young people brought up. Militants, murders, corruption, the thirst to get rich in any way. And nothing sacred.
              2. Zlatik 12 November 2015 06: 54 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                These "historians" - the 5th column - it’s high time to send a 20-meter forest with a jigsaw to cut!
          2. OlegLex 12 November 2015 20: 05 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Oh, I don’t know, I’m not sure, those who are 60 years old will either retire soon or are already retired, those who have worked at least with computer technology in recent years, or those whose children have grandchildren with computers, do not look at your “classmates” Finding the age beyond 60 and understand the truth of life.
        2. patr 11 November 2015 08: 30 New
          • 39
          • 0
          +39
          And it always has been. Take for example WWII. Who got under the gun? Who was dying in the trenches? Not these screamers who scream at every corner about the lack of crap and regularly go to the embassies for tanks, but simple IVANS and MARY !!! So it will be now. I believe, not everything is lost !!! But the war is already underway. Only some can not, or maybe do not want to understand this.
          1. Talgat 11 November 2015 09: 22 New
            • 38
            • 0
            +38
            Of course, there was propaganda in the USSR too, and perhaps some facts were "artistically" interpreted "

            But the goal of the liberals is not to establish the historical truth at all - their goal is to use some details to discredit the USSR as a whole and belittle the significance of the feat of the Soviet people in the Second World War
            to sow disappointment and rejection of patriotism in society - these are the goals of external enemies

            In fact, the details are not so important, the main thing is that we all understand that the Panfilov division had a place to be - it was really recruited in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and really played an important role in the battles near Moscow. Our hero is real - Baurzhan Momysh Uly - one of the most productive commanders near Moscow. The feat of the Soviet people and the leadership of the country is real
            1. Santa Fe 11 November 2015 10: 01 New
              • -60
              • 0
              -60
              The best monument

              The best monument ever!
              1. Ingvar 72 11 November 2015 10: 31 New
                • 74
                • 0
                +74
                Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                The best monument

                Hi Oleg! hi This one is better! laughing
                1. Santa Fe 11 November 2015 10: 49 New
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  +6
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  This one is better!

                  No, you have a desecration of the monument

                  The meaning of the Motherland is a call to peace
                  1. Ingvar 72 11 November 2015 11: 44 New
                    • 14
                    • 0
                    +14
                    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                    No, you have a desecration of the monument

                    The Statue of Liberty is not a monument, but a symbol for attracting a slave of power. Type of lamp-trap for mosquitoes.
                    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                    The meaning of the Motherland is a call to peace

                    A pretty call for peace - you will come with a sword - you will rake the Lyuli! good
                    P.S. And I like Rasteriaev the same! drinks
                    1. Sober 12 November 2015 17: 44 New
                      • 5
                      • 0
                      +5
                      The strongest call for peace! Whoever comes to us with a sword will perish by the sword. (St. Alexander Nevsky)
                2. free 12 November 2015 08: 47 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  chop off your hand!
              2. aba
                aba 11 November 2015 21: 50 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Looks like censored Charlie Ebdo
              3. OlegLex 12 November 2015 20: 08 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                you can’t mix holy things with shit. minus
            2. kalibr 11 November 2015 14: 02 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Even the ancients knew: the devil is always hiding in trifles! (in this case - in the details!)
            3. MrK
              MrK 12 November 2015 14: 02 New
              • 9
              • 0
              +9
              When you read liberal-moronic nonsense, I want to once again lay out a story about modern Panfilov liberals. Read.

              EXPLOITING HEROES (STORY) - 2011.11.19
              AUTHOR: ANDREW SIDORCHIK
              http://www.pravda.info/society/96593.html

              ... The historian Mironenko felt a kick in the ass and collapsed to the frozen bottom of the trench. Still not believing what was happening, he got up and looked up. On the edge of the trench in a semicircle were soldiers of the Red Army.
              - This is the last? - clarified one of the military, apparently the commander.
              “That's right, comrade political instructor!” - the soldier reported, whose kick sent the director of the State Archive to the trench.
              - Excuse me, what's going on? The historian muttered.
              “How is it going?” - grinned the political instructor. - The establishment of historical justice. Now you, Mironenko, will save Moscow from the Nazi invaders.
              Politruk pointed to a field on which several dozen German tanks froze in anticipation. Tankers climbed onto the towers and, shivering from the cold, watched with interest what was happening at Russian positions.
              - I? Why me? - Mironenko asked in shock. “What do I have to do with this?”
              “The most direct,” answered the political instructor. - All of you here have the most direct relation to this!
              The commander pointed Mironenko to the trench and the historian saw that it was full of respected people: there were already academician Pivovarov and his nephew-journalist, Svanidze was sitting by the machine gun with bulging eyes, next to him was the main de-regulator Fedotov, who was trembling from the cold, or from horror , further there were still familiar faces, but the frightened archivist completely forgot their names.
              “What are we all doing here?” - asked Mironenko. - This is not our era.
              The soldiers laughed together. Not only Russians but also Germans laughed, and even the recently killed German tanker, trying to maintain decency and pretending not to hear anything, nevertheless, shuddered with laughter.
              - Yes? - the political instructor was surprised. “But you all tell in such detail in detail how it really was!” You explain with foam at the mouth that we threw Hitler with corpses. It’s you shouting that the people won the war, not the commanders, and especially not Stalin. You explain this to everyone that Soviet heroes are a myth! You yourself, Mironenko, told us that we were a myth!
              - Excuse me, are you political instructor Klochkov? - asked Mironenko.
              “Exactly,” the commander answered. - And these are my fighters who are destined to lay their heads in this battle at the Dubosekovo junction! But you, Mironenko, assured that everything was wrong, that all these heroes were a propaganda myth! And you know what we decided? We decided to really be a myth. And to defend Moscow to trust trusted and reliable people. In particular, to you!
              - And you? The historian asked quietly.
              “And we are in the rear,” one of the fighters answered. - The guys and I were thinking to die for our homeland, for Stalin, but since we are a myth, why should we substitute bullets for nothing! Fight for yourself!
              “Hey Russians, how long have you been?” - shouted the shy German tankman.
              “Now, Hans, now,” the political instructor waved to him. - You see, Mironenko, time does not endure. It is time for you to defend your homeland.
              Then academician Pivovarov jumped out of the trench and rushed briskly towards the Germans with raised hands. In his hands he held white pants, which he was actively waving.
              “What a shame,” one of the fighters said.
              “Don’t worry,” Klochkov chuckled. - This is not our shame!
              Two German tankers caught Pivovarov and dragged him by the arms to the trench, dropping him down.
              “Schweine,” the German swore, looking at his overalls. “This hero of yours has pissed me off my leg with fear!”
              1. MrK
                MrK 12 November 2015 14: 07 New
                • 7
                • 0
                +7
                Read more.
                The second tankman shot Panfilov’s people to smoke and, drawing out, said:
                - Yes, comrades, you're out of luck! And for these here you were dying! Really in our Vaterland same have grown?
                “No, comrade,” one of the Panfilov responded to him. “You now have none.” Only g e and yes the Turks.
                - And who are they? - the German specified.
                A Red Army soldier whispered an answer to the aggressor in his ear. The face of the German was flooded with shame. Waving his hand, he went to the tank.
                “Let's quickly end with us,” he said. “I want to die from such things again.”
                Svanidze rushed from the trench to the political instructor.
                - Comrade commander, you misunderstood me, I didn’t say anything like that! And then, I can’t, I have a “white ticket”, I have poor eyesight and an ulcer!
                Politruk confidentially leaned towards Svanidze:
                - Do you think the tyrant Stalin was worried? He bombarded the enemy with cannon fodder! And even more so, I'm not your commander. You have your own - experienced and proven! Here he comes!
                From the depths of the trench Nikita Mikhalkov came to the place of conversation, holding a shovel from his hand.
                - Comrade political instructor, how can this be fought against tanks? - the director begged.
                “You know better,” the commander answered. “You already did this.” Yes, by the way, your beds are there. You can quickly establish anti-tank defense from them! Well, or pray, or something. Maybe help!
                Then the political instructor ordered the construction of his fighters.
                - Where are you going? - Mikhalkov asked with a longing in his voice.
                - Where to? - the political instructor grinned. - Take a position in your rear! The NKVD detachment is not at hand, so we ourselves will replace it! And if some scum from your penal battalion rushes out of position, we will shoot on the spot for cowardice and treason!
                - So there are no penal battles yet!
                - One created. Especially for you!
                German tanks roared engines. Desperate screams and swearing were heard in the trench - the new defenders of Moscow found out who was the first to expose the myths and dragged them into this story. Fedotov was beaten all together, after which he was thrown out of the trench under a German tank with a bottle. Someone shouted goodbye to him:
                - Well, for the Motherland, for Stalin!
                Mikhalkov clung to the outgoing political officer:
                - Comrade, my father fought, I was always a patriot and defender of heroes, help me!
                “Only out of respect for you,” the political instructor answered. - I give a great tool to fight the enemy! As good as it gets!
                And the commander handed the director a badminton racket and three shuttlecocks.
                “Farewell, your homeland will not forget you,” Mikhalkov, the political instructor, patted goodbye and rushed after his departing fighters ...
                repost with Captain45:
                1. gorefest7777 13 November 2015 09: 21 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  great fiction !!!! It would be true that these dodgers at least an hour there, so as not to mess our souls with their shit from shit!
              2. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 14: 56 New
                • -12
                • 0
                -12
                Political instructor at the forefront? What kind of bullshit?
                1. Sorokin 13 November 2015 16: 49 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  They were in reconnaissance, and went in search. The fact that they were not prepared and the idiots lacked is also true. Grandfather told. But there were. And on the very front line and the stripes were not paired. They finished them first and knocked them out.
            4. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 14: 54 New
              • -7
              • 0
              -7
              Quote: Talgat
              In fact, the details are not so important, the main thing is that we all understand that the Panfilov division had a place to be - it was really recruited in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and really played an important role in the battles near Moscow. Our hero is real - Baurzhan Momysh Uly - one of the most productive commanders near Moscow. The feat of the Soviet people and the leadership of the country is real

              Well no. Details are just important. In order to prevent more war without a dull cheer of patriotism.
          2. Hon
            Hon 11 November 2015 13: 01 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: patr
            And it always has been. Take for example WWII. Who got under the gun? Who was dying in the trenches?

            Well, where are we now in the trenches? on stock exchanges and banks.
            1. Sober 12 November 2015 17: 56 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Hon
              Well, where are we now in the trenches? on stock exchanges and banks.

              There is no place here for dreams and chimeras,
              Noisy those years time.
              All couriers, couriers, couriers,
              Broker, broker, broker.
              From Jew to Chinese
              Rogue and gentleman
              All in a single column are considered
              Equally - business men,
              On tops, caps and caps
              A rain of stocks whistles and pours.
              That's where the world chains are to you,
              This is where the world swindler is.
              If you want to burst out your soul here,
              That will be considered: either stupid, or drunk.
              Here it is - the world exchange!
              Here they are - scoundrels of all countries. (Yesenin)
          3. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 14: 49 New
            • -14
            • 0
            -14
            Read the memories of veterans. Political workers were not particularly fond of keeping their fat asses away from the front lines. And such political workers invented fairy tales about the destroyed thousands of Germans. Frontline workers only grinned bitterly in response to this bullshit, because the war came with great blood and partly because of such stupid ideologists who were going to throw all their hats. Where in the 41st year came 3 million prisoners? But these were the very peasants who did not want to fight for the fucking workdays on the fucking collective farms, where they also wanted to charge you for the fact that you wanted to have an extra cow to feed the children. Maybe it's time to tell people the truth? What should they bear the hardships for and what should they fight for? For the patrician ambitions of leadership?
        3. mishaia_23 11 November 2015 09: 30 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          You know, I noticed this trend in Odnokl. liberal propaganda is now underway, as everything is bad in the Russian Federation, salaries are falling, pensioners, medicine are being beaten by social programs in general, they say the authorities are not happy with them.

          Admins. you really need to block these pages ...
          Honestly already got these русофоwould
          1. Hon
            Hon 11 November 2015 13: 05 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: mishaia_23
            You know, I noticed this trend in Odnokl. liberal propaganda is now underway, as everything is bad in the Russian Federation, salaries are falling, pensioners, medicine are being beaten by social programs in general, they say the authorities are not happy with them.

            and it’s possible to block thoughts? if you close yourself from such moods, the mood will not go anywhere, just you will not know about them.
        4. Alexey-74 11 November 2015 09: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          precisely noticed ....
        5. Down House 11 November 2015 10: 18 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Sirocco
          So those who are over 60 years old, the pages of real people write a lot of comments, why would there be such a change?

          They are probably real people, rather ordinary paid bots, masquerading as real people "with experience."
          1. varov14 11 November 2015 21: 56 New
            • 12
            • 0
            +12
            Something tells me that this is crap about sixties. I’m close to seventy, I’m friendly with the computer, but I don’t like much in domestic politics, we harness too long, but anyway, the main enemies of Russia. They found historians, now in peacetime a person can lie on a grenade to protect his neighbor, and war in general requires self-sacrifice by definition. Listen to these pigs do not respect yourself, in Syria, the airfield kept the garrison for a year, and we Russians have been surrounded all our lives, we must scrape off this liberal mold, the state body will be healthier.
            1. Sober 12 November 2015 18: 11 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              With filthy mold must be constantly and vigilantly fought. According to scientific research, it is indestructible. It can lurk, and then still it will come out in all its glory. One must be vigilant, not let her penetrate deeply into the foundation and walls. And then, like the USSR, this trash can undermine and destroy.
          2. Sober 12 November 2015 18: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Down House
            They are probably real people, rather ordinary paid bots, masquerading as real people "with experience."

            Who recorded me in bots ?!
        6. Hon
          Hon 11 November 2015 13: 00 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          Quote: Sirocco
          and now there is a war against us,

          and the country's leadership, heads of state corporations and others, about the war in the know? something is not noticeable. deputies salary doubled "all for the front, all for the victory" wassat
          1. Sirocco 11 November 2015 17: 24 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Hon
            and the country's leadership, heads of state corporations and others, about the war in the know?

            I will answer you with your phrases.
            Quote: Hon

            and it’s possible to block thoughts? if you close yourself from such moods, the mood will not go anywhere, just you will not know about them.

            laughing hi
        7. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 18 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Sirocco, you are probably a civil servant or deputy?
        8. mervino2007 13 November 2015 00: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Sirocco
          many do not want to sacrifice benefits

          Dear, how should these old people sacrifice? Than? In what form? And most importantly - why? Do not turn away, war is war, and wealth is wealth, it is growing. Poverty, too. Here you would turn to the oligarchs. With the same. But there will be no response, seriously. Our elite at all times at first thought about their pocket, and then about the general. Therefore, the trouble of 1612. and the death of Emperor Paul - their actions. And now? The booth continues .....
        9. cast iron 13 November 2015 22: 56 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well, yes, the oligarchs with bureaucrats will not sacrifice anything, because the belts for them will be pulled around the neck of the population)))
      2. Ded_smerch 11 November 2015 08: 41 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Attempt No.
        I agree, these “historians” have already been telling us from the mid 80s that our history is dirt and horror. All this happens with such regularity that I personally do not notice when a new wave begins. For me, it’s been around 30 years already, and the advent of the Internet has become more noticeable.
        1. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 14: 58 New
          • -6
          • 0
          -6
          Quote: Ded_smerch
          Attempt No.
          I agree, these “historians” have already been telling us from the mid 80s that our history is dirt and horror. All this happens with such regularity that I personally do not notice when a new wave begins. For me, it’s been around 30 years already, and the advent of the Internet has become more noticeable.

          If there he himself survived several attacks of the Nazis, with huge losses because there is nothing elementary to defend. And then German machine guns would drive you into the forehead - then I would listen to you.
          1. gunya 12 November 2015 17: 21 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            THE_SEAL (3) RU

            And if you, dear, do not even put on the defensive, but push you into a drunk with a knife, what would you do?
            It is good to reason while sitting on the sofa and in the subjunctive mood, and if so, in fact?
            1. Sober 12 November 2015 18: 24 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              I saw, in real, modern life, how one person rushed at 6 drunken people kicking two with their feet. It was not a commando. He did not even serve in the army (by sight). And he dispersed them. There are Russian people, there is the Russian Spirit, on Russian Earth! Shut up the mold! You have to keep the answer!

              And, I also know a woman who, when a bandit pointed a gun at her husband. I broke the bottle and put it to the throat of a villain ...
              And defend the homeland ... Many can and Panfilovskimi and Sailors ... become. Do not doubt!!!

              And also, I want to say. Everyone judges others by himself! So it's easy to see who is in front of us!
          2. Ded_smerch 13 November 2015 08: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Well, tell us the whole truth about cuttings from shovels and detachments, for a long time I did not listen to you "experts"
      3. Ingvar 72 11 November 2015 10: 36 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Candidates for "construction superintendents" in line

        The candidates are the same. When searching for the biography of Sergei Mironov, a fact surfaced quite by accident (but naturally) -
        Jewish historian and teacher Sergey Mitrofanov
        http://www.aen.ru/?page=brief&article_id=74884
        Nothing changes in this world. request
      4. Sasha 19871987 11 November 2015 14: 40 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        I can tell the liberals only one thing - they don’t judge the winners ... don’t touch our heroes, from century to century the achievements of Russia are belittling Mothers !!!
        1. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 00 New
          • -6
          • 0
          -6
          Quote: Sasha 19871987
          I can tell the liberals only one thing - they don’t judge the winners ... don’t touch our heroes, from century to century the achievements of Russia are belittling Mothers !!!

          Heroes should not be touched. But the truth must be said about the war. So that generations would not be tempted to start another slaughter.
          1. MrK
            MrK 13 November 2015 18: 47 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: THE_SEAL
            But the truth must be said about the war. So that generations would not be tempted to start another slaughter.


            The truth about war is our victory. The truth about the war - these are the heroes we know that gave their lives for what you lived Real propaganda cannot beat its own.
            And even if the propagandists of the time of the Great Patriotic War embellished something, then this was done to raise the national spirit, and not to receive prizes and stars.
            Most people live with myths about our victories, because there are almost no living sources.
            And destroying these myths you destroy the national spirit, faith in the grandfathers of the victors. And you are just trying to get the Russian people to lose their ability to rally against a possible aggressor. The question is why are you doing this?
            If you are a historian, then argue about the accuracy of historical facts in your own scientific journals. And do not touch the people.
            And one should not print stupid liberal stupid things about one rifle on three, detachments of the border, who shot their own, fines who won the war, the troupes of our soldiers who covered up the trenches.
            Question: Why do almost all liberalists belong to a particular ethnic group?
      5. Aksakal_07 11 November 2015 17: 11 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Well, I do not! The liberals will not be able to repeat the trick of the late 80s with the creation of the next "Interregional Bloc of People's Deputies" to try to collapse Russia!
      6. bastard 11 November 2015 20: 45 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Attempt No. ... to ruin the country from within. Candidates for "construction superintendents" in line

        Queue in turn. am
      7. BMP-2 11 November 2015 21: 00 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        VIA "Historians" sings to someone else's tune. And if they pay extra, then they will dance! yes lol
        1. Sofia 12 November 2015 10: 04 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          That's for sure! And the dance, and the show will show. And how many of such "via", who make a name for themselves on everything they can. No, they themselves would show patriotism.
          1. gunya 12 November 2015 17: 25 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            That's for sure! And the dance, and the show will show. And how many of such "via", who make a name for themselves on everything they can. No, they themselves would show patriotism.


            And why, they already live well on grants: know to pour mud on the country in which you grew up and got an education.
      8. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 16 New
        • -6
        • 0
        -6
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Attempt No. ... to ruin the country from within. Candidates for "superintendents of perestroika" lined up in line. They are offended that their society does not support.

        To tell the truth about the war is to ruin the country? Dude, you need to be in the trenches for a day.
        1. Sober 12 November 2015 18: 31 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Who has some truth!
        2. Ded_smerch 13 November 2015 08: 33 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          why are you cackling about "you would ..." have no other arguments? As you already zadolbali "Pravoruby"
    2. Starover_Z 11 November 2015 07: 05 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Trying to twist the stream of history and the place of those killed in the war for the right to exist of the state, the Mitrofanov & Co. campaign simply simply identified itself as modern political Euro-gays!
      1. Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 07: 48 New
        • 17
        • 0
        +17
        100 years will pass and historians will be crowded who will say that there was no battle on the Kursk Bulge and there was no Brest Fortress.
        And the most surprising thing is that those who will believe and say will come to their surprise. Yes, you read the works of the next Gumelev, he put everything on the shelves.
        1. aleks_29296 11 November 2015 10: 26 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          Everything will depend on the upbringing of young people, what values ​​they instill in her, because she is the bearer of historical memory. And so, if the young now drive the so-called alternative history, over time, those who witnessed historical events will die out, and ... welcome to the new reality. Ukraine is a living example of this.
          1. Sober 12 November 2015 18: 33 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: aleks_29296
            Ukraine is a living example of this.

            A terrible example.
        2. perm23 11 November 2015 10: 56 New
          • 21
          • 0
          +21
          The whole trend is that we Russians are always and to blame for everything, everything is wrong with us, everything is false. We all have to apologize for everything. We have honestly gotten it all. And the worst thing the country is doing about it. Someone really wants to rummage and find a lie and expose it, someone just spit in their history once again, in their people. Yes and power being on it, apologizes too. We bomb ISIS and why all this evidence that we didn’t end up in the hospital, we are so good. The West is useless to prove something, they don’t need it, Nobody is fighting for the truth. The USA and the EU, when they bombed Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, didn’t apologize to anyone that they didn’t get there. It is time to end this endless apology for Lenin, for Stalin, for Katyn, for the USSR, etc. No one apologizes to us, not Italy, Spain, Hungary, Romania, for which they fought against us in the ranks of the Nazis. Not Poland for the tortured Russians in 20 years. None . And all these scribblers and pseudo-historians have enough to touch our history with their dirty hands.
        3. Sergey S. 11 November 2015 22: 37 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yes, you read the works of the next Gumelev, he put everything on the shelves.

          A L.N. Gumilev then?
          He listened to his lectures, did not hear anything seditious.
          Gumilev was an opponent of the theory of struggle "des and the steppe", and defended the idea of ​​the need to take into account the geographical _ ethnographic factor.
          But only.
          Only some stubborn "historians" did not agree ... found something to complain about on trifles .... but they did not refute the essence of L.N. Gumilyov.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. GAF
            GAF 12 November 2015 00: 13 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            "And what about L.N. Gumilyov?" Well then. At one time, he poured some ethnic groups in the order of salt on the tail, comparing them with viruses in a healthy body. That still burns. They can’t calm down in any way.
        4. The comment was deleted.
    3. Victor jnnjdfy 11 November 2015 07: 09 New
      • -24
      • 0
      -24
      Advocates from the frontline newspapers worked as they could. How much they lacked imagination.
      We would like our "historical roots" to be true.
      Moreover, we always had heroes and there were examples of self-sacrifice in the name of the Motherland. But sometimes it happened that it was easier and easier for a fighter of the propaganda front to come up with something while sitting in the editorial office.
      Now you do not need to find out who was which hero. People fought and died for their country. And for the future, we can conclude that Mr. Mitrofanovs had fewer reasons for "cutting off."
      1. mirag2 11 November 2015 07: 52 New
        • 17
        • 0
        +17
        Sorry, but in the ass of these "historians" ...
        Here is the true face of such “historians” —all of them are of the same berry field (+ 18, obscene language):
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. kalibr 11 November 2015 08: 00 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Yes, that would be something to pay attention to the author. For example, there is a photo of Zoe, obtained from a German officer. They show that the young girl gave her life for her homeland. What is even more valuable you can give? It doesn't matter what she did or didn't do. She died fighting for the Motherland! So there is no problem with the base.
        Panfilov ... It seems to be found out whether the author of the article came up with it or not. So it turned out or not? That's what's important! We read as in the newspaper Pravda this feat of theirs described comrade Zhdanov (we had such a party leader) in England. Since he described it, oh, it would be better not to describe it. Germans ... Tak.With them. To the anniversary of 1995, we published a book written by officers of our army "The Psychology of the Great Victory of the Soviet People", where, with references to the MO archive, it was reported about deserters, and gunners, and about 500 thousand criminal cases excited against owls. soldier for the war. And 80 thousand officers! But ... according to SEPARATE TYPES of crimes, they are not dismantled, that is, dismantled, but it is still secret. It is clear that the rape was, and the sentences were ... How much exactly? Secret! So what are we surprised that people "there" use this and pour slop on us? And who is to blame? It was secret even where tanks of the ALEXANDER NEVSKI column were sent with money from the Russian Orthodox Church. This was only recently discovered, and in Soviet times it was a MYSTERY! So the question of historical truth is an important political issue. Until everything is clarified, there will be people speculating on some particular inaccuracies and "uncertainties." They will declare them IMPORTANT according to the principle “there is no forest behind the trees”, and they will say “weak minds” to them - “All lies!”. And this will continue if everything is left as it is!
        1. oracul 11 November 2015 08: 35 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          I hope your thoughts are pure. But we must always remember that on the scales of history there is always truth and a lie. So, if you diligently rummage through the annals of history, in search of abominations, then they really were. How can they not be if tens of millions of people have come into motion, if we have lost 27 million people, of which the vast majority of civilians, if the most industrial part of the country, city and village has been destroyed, if many have lost relatives and friends? But the truth is different: the party and Stalin personally did not call for violence, on the contrary, they said that "the Hitlers came and went, but the German people remained," crossing this line brought to justice, up to the execution. Can we still apologize for the defeat of fascism? As for the Germans, I will say this: many of them were ready to sleep for the sake of family products, even with Americans, even with Russians. Then it was time to make excuses to those who didn’t do it, and here Western historians poured off - Russophobes and it started - violence, violence ... We must respect ourselves, our country, our people and their exploit to answer as Stalin Tito answered when he presented claims to the behavior of individual soldiers and officers during the liberation of Yugoslavia: yes, facts do occur, but this cannot erase what has been done for the Victory (in my account). There is no need to turn into purebirds, for fortunately they do not make history, but the people themselves.
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 08: 59 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Leonid! In order not to repeat you, I will confine: YES, YES, YES! And I once wrote in an article on Makarevich (here!) That here is Shchukar’s grandfather ... he didn’t have a latrine, but we are still a great nation, and our history is great and tragic. And everything was in it, yes, but this is our story! And there should be a big TACT for those who are trying to understand its intricacies, CULTURE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH. And not so - aaa, there is no data ... it means that everyone lied here, everything r ... "Russia was lost!" So, too, is impossible and this is not a method!
        2. perm23 11 November 2015 08: 43 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Then there was a war, a terrible war, there was a lot, but you don’t have to dig into all this now, there was a different time and today you should not sit in the trench but at the table, and enjoy the life given to the dead soldiers, find out what and how it was then. You just have to be thankful to the dead heroes. You just need to be people. Why do you know who and how many raped, who sat for what, who knocked out how much, who exactly was at this junction, whether it was or not. They are all heroes and all.
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 09: 03 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            If you follow your logic, then such attacks will continue in ever-increasing amounts. Therefore, that from the point of view of the law, people did not commit anything criminal, which means they simply can’t shut up their mouth like that.
        3. Egoza 11 November 2015 09: 25 New
          • 13
          • 0
          +13
          Quote: kalibr
          So the question of historical truth is an important political issue. Until everything is clarified, there will be people speculating on some separate inaccuracies and "unknowns." They will declare them IMPORTANT according to the principle "you can’t see the forest behind the trees," and "weak minds" assent to them - "All lies!". And this will continue if everything is left as it is!

          As long as the country does not have a clear and clear ideology, such historians will pervert history in order to fool youth. How was it in the Dallas plan? “We must conduct such propaganda so that they can never again have the Young Guards and the Cosmodemyans.” That's all according to plan. Moreover, it is very necessary to discredit the USSR to those who have seized the people's good - factories, factories, lands. On the one hand, it’s impossible to blame everything in a row, but it’s impossible to praise, otherwise people will vividly remember socialism. Therefore, it is necessary to discredit the brightest, most heroic pages of history. But the real ISTROIA will put everything in its place. Give a deadline.
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 10: 33 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Egoza
            But the real ISTROIA will put everything in its place. Give time.

            Did you know that many of our data in the military archives is classified until the 2045 year? Is this the time limit you give? Why not open them now, eh?
            1. creak 11 November 2015 21: 51 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: kalibr
              Quote: Egoza
              But the real ISTROIA will put everything in its place. Give time.

              Did you know that many of our data in the military archives is classified until the 2045 year? Is this the time limit you give? Why not open them now, eh?


              Read the collection “The Vulture of Secrecy Removed” (edited by General-Letentant Krivosheev (RF General Staff)) - this is just the first and hopeful, but not the last attempt to show the true scale of the tragedy that befell the country ...
              For those who are especially vigilant - a documentary collection - prepared by professionals - the State Department did not participate in the preparation ...
              1. kalibr 11 November 2015 22: 23 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                So what? One tiny collection of huge archive MO. Do you know how many pages in the books PSYCHOLOGY OF THE GREAT VICTORY OF THE SOVIET PEOPLE, Prometheus, Tver 1995 (military team, all on the MO archive) - 85 page. ALL PSYCHOLOGY in 85 page. And how many volumes in our history of the Second World War? And how much in the history of 2-th world of war published in the United States and in Japan? Incompatible !!! And why is that? And they started all with a 6 volume!
        4. PSih2097 11 November 2015 11: 57 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: kalibr
          For example, there is a photo of Zoe obtained from a German officer. It shows that the young girl gave her life for her homeland.

          Then Joseph Vissarionovich ordered not to capture the soldiers of that German regiment that Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya was hanged.
        5. MrK
          MrK 12 November 2015 13: 50 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: kalibr
          It is clear that there were rape, and the sentences were ... How much exactly? Secret!


          Yes, there is not a secret. Type in any search engine author Alexander Kurlyandchik "Damned Soviet Power" ... on Prose. RU. A quote from this book with links:
          Historians know the exact number of Soviet troops punished for their cruel treatment of civilians, mostly German (including rape): 4148 troops.
          This, incidentally, is consistent with the number of Allied soldiers who fell under the military tribunal for rape in 1944-45. - 5280.
          1. gorefest7777 13 November 2015 09: 25 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            only the proportions in the propropy are different, how many allies on the front were 450 tons for the people, and we have 7 million. I think there is a difference.
      3. Simon 11 November 2015 08: 06 New
        • 26
        • 0
        +26
        "Victor Jnnjdfy", I have a question, why did the Nazis stop at Dubosekov? They had only a little to go to Moscow and they would be in Moscow, because it was free further, there were no more troops. Apparently the Nazis were tired, or froze and set fire to their tanks to keep warm! You drive bullshit, a modern propagandist. There were 28 Panfilovites, there were these heroes and they stopped the fascist armored tank. Changing the story, soon the liberals, fueled by American dollars, will begin to say that the Americans won the war with the British, that they took Berlin and that the Soviet Union did not win the war.
        1. kalibr 11 November 2015 08: 36 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Namesake, welcome! You responded well to Viktor, but ... no matter how much you say that you believe in 28 heroes (and the heroes were, otherwise the war would end completely differently), there will always be a person who will read the description of their heroism in the Pravda newspaper for 42 year (I do not remember the offhand number, but this is who wants to find it) given in England by our party leader Zhdanov. He probably spoke with the best of intentions. I wanted to make an impression. But ... there are details that, well ... "not real." And what would you say to this person when he shows you the text from the newspaper? But Zhdanov should have known better than others? Or not? That is, we need honest and objective people who would figure it all out once and for all. Because the heroes were, many, modest, even shy people. Unknown! And were there, Kozma Kryuchkovs, who killed 11 Germans, 11 captured and got 11 wounds in themselves and 11 in a horse? That's what he said, by the way, or did a leisurely journalist write?
        2. patr 11 November 2015 08: 38 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          It's time for them to close their mouths. Selling creatures !!!!
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 09: 03 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            How do you do it, Victor? Understand that the era of the "dictatorship of the proletariat" and "comrade Mauser" has sunk into oblivion, now it can only be done by law. You don’t even have the right to write about their “corruption” according to the law - where is the evidence that the same Mitrofanov receives money from the United States, including for this material? Believe me, if everything was as simple as you think, they would not have been doing it for a long time ... Do you understand why?
            1. Nonna 11 November 2015 11: 40 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              don't worry - the time will come for shooting liberal shit.
          2. Alexey-74 11 November 2015 10: 12 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            they need to be planted ..... for 10-15 years then they will think about how to open their mouths.
        3. gorefest7777 13 November 2015 09: 27 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          even better - the Americans landed a squad of immortal zombies under a Dubosekovo teleporting them from parallel reality and JJ Bush the Younger commanded them along with Eisenhower. Just a little bit and it will be so: ((((!!!!!
      4. Colonel 11 November 2015 08: 13 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Quote: Victor Jnnjdfy
        Advocates from the frontline newspapers worked as they could. How much imagination they had

        That's right. For example, Sergei Borzenko fantasized to the point that he went to the landing (as a correspondent) and earned the Star of the Hero (as an officer). And it does not dispute, documented. And you with your
        Quote: Victor Jnnjdfy
        I would like our "historical roots" to be true

        you think that since Matrosov was not near a lawyer and a DVR, then there was no feat. And so more than 300 times during the war. The propagandists sat and invented according to the order. I don’t want to stick labels, you stick it yourself.
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. Varyag_1973 11 November 2015 09: 20 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        For Victor Jnnjdfy. Well, here you have found Mr. Mitrofanov ..., log in, the country must know its "heroes" in person!

        "The propagandists from the front-line newspapers worked as they could. As far as they lacked imagination."

        Everything was clear with the propagandists in the USSR, they worked for the good of the Union, but whose good are you working for ?!
        1. kalibr 11 November 2015 10: 43 New
          • -5
          • 0
          -5
          You, Alexey, are too severe to Victor. You can not do it this way! Open all the same truth. We look at the photo: T-34 goes to the front. We look at the chassis - there is no rubber on the wheels! Rubber deficiency with all the ensuing consequences! Not one photo, not two ... The question is, why not give the tower, the body, but not to show that ... it would not be necessary? Then a photo - tires appeared on the first and last wheels - deliveries began ... Then - again, all the wheels in tires.
          We read the article ... "The heroic tanker is wounded by a shrapnel while in a tank ..." What was it impossible to write about? What is injured? Not! What a splinter in the tank !!! Do you understand why? And you "worked for the good of the Union" ... How did you work? It turns out to work poorly! Or did not know how? And who watched?
          That is, the blunders made with the best intentions because of the dense non-professionalism (?) Are so much in the Truth that ... you won’t wonder who is behind this? Enemies? Stalin did not see that he was reading the Truth with a blue pencil in his hands? So he is not so wrong ...
          1. Colonel 11 November 2015 12: 56 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: kalibr
            What a shrapnel in the tank !!! I see why?

            Unclear. In the absence of alloying additives in the armor, it became quite fragile and a shell hit, even without breaking through the armor, caused chips that split the crew.
            1. kalibr 11 November 2015 13: 30 New
              • -5
              • 0
              -5
              And why was it to know the general Soviet public? Newspapers also wrote that our tanks .... high-speed, armored. And suddenly a fragment broke through the armor and wounded the tankman. Let this 100 time be true during the war years should not have been written about this. This is the basis of propaganda: do not lie, but keep silent!

              I do not understand what a minus? What did I say wrong?
              1. uragan114 11 November 2015 20: 36 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Why only to the Soviet public? If about the T-34, it was already recognized by everyone that it was the best WWII tank. And here lies and silence?
                1. kalibr 11 November 2015 22: 27 New
                  • -1
                  • 0
                  -1
                  I tell you about one thing, you tell me about another, by God! It is not written in the Truth that this is T-34! And it doesn’t matter 34 or 144. It is important how the material is served: first our tanks ... blah blah blah. Then - a shard struck in the tank. So fragments pierce the armor of owls. tanks! Why write about it when you can not write? Heroism does not diminish it! What is it really necessary to chew on it?
              2. gunya 12 November 2015 18: 05 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I do not understand what a minus? What did I say wrong?


                For not understanding the situation of that time. For those who do not understand:
                the front and the rear were not isolated, on the contrary, they closely communicated, so there was no need to hide anything.

                For colonel SU

                It's not about the absence of alloys, if you had to be inside the tank, then probably remember that the inner surface is rubberized (T-34-85, T-10, IS-3, T-54) in order to eliminate the spread of scale that occurs when casting the tower and subsequent t /about.
                1. Colonel 13 November 2015 16: 47 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: gunya
                  rubberized surface

                  Surely in the episode indicated by Kalibr it was either T-34-76 or KV. I didn’t see the insides of these cars, but it’s hardly possible to talk about covering them with rubber (I could not decline the word “rubberized” crying ), and even if the BT or T-28 .....
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. gunya 12 November 2015 17: 56 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            kalibr RU

            What could not be written about? What is injured? No! What a shrapnel in the tank !!! I see why? And you "worked for the good of the Union" ... How did you work? It turns out they worked badly! Or didn’t they know how? And who was following?


            And why "without knowing the ford" distort?
            Or it is not known what any tank crew member
            can injure a fragment inside the tank from armor pierced by armor-piercing, from a burst of the projectile itself, even from a stray fragment flew into the hatch.
            According to the tankers who fought, the hatches of the commander and driver were almost always ajar.
          4. uragan114 14 November 2015 12: 19 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            "We look at the photo: T-34 is going to the front. We look at the chassis - nem rubber on wheels! Rubber deficiency with all the ensuing consequences! Not one photo, not two "

            I understand that I’m answering late, but this is the T-34 of the model of the 41st year. This is a design feature: on two wheels the “rubber band” stood on top of the wheel, on the rest inside the hubs.
            Take a closer look and see that the wheels are different.
        2. Victor jnnjdfy 11 November 2015 14: 51 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          They would work for the good of the Union, if they wrote the Truth about the exploits, and would not invent them. As happened, for example, with the feat of Mr. Gastello.
          Then it turns out that it was not like that at all (many more local residents remembered those events), as some military commander-in-chief described, and the crew was not the same, and the grave was wrong (they discovered this back in 1951 and silenced this fact ) ... As a result, in the 90s they shot a docfilm in which all the lies were turned inside out, and according to the results, the title of Hero of Russia (posthumously) was assigned to another captain, by the name of Maslov, who was buried in the grave, although they learned about it back in 1951 ...
          And the Union was not largely due to the total lies of such propagandists. Lie has short legs.
          Both Maslov and Gastello died fighting for their homeland. Maslov eventually got a Hero star, thanks not to propagandists, but to historians and enthusiasts.
          I wrote, if you carefully read, that you do not need to give an occasion to Messrs. Mitrofanov for their propaganda, inventing fairy tales and fables, and henceforth, as far as possible, truthfully write about the exploits and people who committed them.
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 22: 32 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Victor Jnnjdfy
            And the Union was not largely due to the total lies of such propagandists. Lie has short legs.

            Yes!!! Totally agree with you! Moreover, it has been proven long ago by research on newspapers and archives! My graduate student will have to defend on the topic of informing the Soviet press of citizens of the USSR from 1921 to 53 year about living abroad. There are TRUTHs, archives, a lot of local newspapers ... I think it’s worth giving here excerpts from her work, so that people would see at what unsteady information foundation our society was built. But it is impossible!
            1. Victor jnnjdfy 12 November 2015 08: 46 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              As soon as you “give me passages”, local cheers, patriotic fossils and simply inadequate comrades will pounce on you and try to “tear to pieces” ...
              On this site, for example, almost everyone is convinced that Polish officers in Katyn were shot by the Nazis. And such facts as Shelepin’s letter, or the fact that in May 1940 all correspondence between these officers and their relatives ceased, does not seriously affect local minds and does not prove anything.
            2. Victor jnnjdfy 12 November 2015 09: 40 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Now, too, the information foundation in places is not very "fundamental." For example, the media and senior officials often say that Khatyn was burned by Bandera. Although, if you want, you can easily find out that Khatyn burned punishers from the battalion, which was formed in Kiev from captured Red Army soldiers. And the main arsonist Vasyur before the war was not Bandera, but Art. lieutenant of the Red Army. The battalion, of course, was overwhelmingly ethnic Ukrainians. But for the current Svidomo Ukrainians, we are "lying" trying to defame the "heroic Bandera patriots." We give them a reason.
              Or take our Public Holiday on November 4th. I still don’t know how it is called correctly. But the point is in it, as we are always told, that on this day in 1612 Polish interventionists were expelled from the Kremlin. On some show, two ex-deputies, the "democrats" Stankevich and Tsapko (they were either ethnic Poles or mixed with Polish blood) poked everyone with the nose that in 1610 the Russian boyars (Semiboyarshchina) themselves invited the Poles to Moscow, and they wanted to make Vladislav a Russian Tsar. If you delve deeper, then the Polish commandant of the Kremlin Gonsevsky was the Velizh elder (Velizh is now in the Smolensk region), and most of all then the atrocities were registered by Cossacks of the Kingdom of Poland, who are not at all Poles, but the ancestors of today's Ukrainians. And which Poles were expelled from? And in the hands of the "Stankevichs" visor ...
    4. Alexey-74 11 November 2015 09: 50 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      I completely agree with the author - to bring a grain of doubt into youth is the true goal of the liberals. An alternative history is not a science, with the same success each of us can become a historian. And “pseudo-historians” are simply paid agents of foreign influence. We just need to raise patriotism in the country, based on the great history of a great state. To completely change the methodology of education in schools and universities, finally introduce a unified history textbook, etc.
      1. Walking 11 November 2015 10: 15 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        The Great Patriotic War dealt a big blow to our gene pool, brave active people died at the fronts, and not the best people in the rear sought armor from the draft.
        And all these pseudo-historians are truly ambitious, either actually stupid, or work out the money invested in them.
      2. kalibr 11 November 2015 14: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Dear Alexey! And who will write this tutorial? Specify a specific person?
    5. Hyppopotut 11 November 2015 10: 25 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      In the 90s, we heard and read such "historians" ... Still sick.
      It’s very insulting that there are quite a few idiots who are being waged on this bullshit!
    6. Down House 11 November 2015 10: 25 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: anEkeName
      Why do those who are on the other side of the barricade have “claims” exclusively to Panfilov’s, Alexander Matrosov and Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya — that is, to whom and what is one of the foundations of patriotism, the core of the ideology of self-sacrifice, fraternity and mutual assistance?

      They have more extensive claims to all the positive moments of our history!
      But they don’t want to leave us in the “liberal countries”, there they are imprisoned for what they are doing illegally!
    7. Altona 11 November 2015 12: 05 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: anEkeName
      An obvious attempt by pseudo-liberoids to cut the historical roots of patriotism - the trunk on which sovereignty rests.

      ----------------------
      It’s better to read the source code of the article, he dragged everyone there, and pushed the Americans to the side with their flag on Iwo Jima, and at the end he began to contradict himself that they supposed to “sing the value of life”, the generals were dying “from vodka and in bed.” Yes, at five minutes our marshals died in battle, on the front line, the same Chernyakhovsky, for example. And feats were performed by people in the name of life on earth. And the soldier must act on orders, and perish by order, otherwise what kind of soldier is he. Apparently, Mr. historian is little aware of the mission of the army in general. And why did German soldiers die, did they also die by order? What the hell did they need in the East? And who gave them the order "drang nah osten"? For some reason, this aspect of the historian’s gentleman didn’t worry, some sort of selective historical truth turned out to be one-sided and with a claim to the dead ... Somehow it’s completely uncomfortable ...
    8. bornikrub 11 November 2015 12: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The creators of fascism are Jews (Torah, Talmud and other cannibalistic charms),
      Distributors - Germans,
      The main carriers are Anglo-Saxons.

      The fascist roots of pseudoliberoids are obvious.
    9. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 13 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Vladimir Pershanin collected the memories of war veterans, not commissar tales, which were actively stuffed in Soviet times, because propaganda forbade telling the truth. So when they were told stories about Matrosov they were surprised, because literally "MG-42 would simply cut his body in half in a split second." And I agree with that. It is necessary to educate on the exploits of real heroes, many of whom remained in the shadows. And then under Stalin, the losses were 7 million. Under Brezhnev it was already 20. And under Gorbachev it was already 26. Moreover, 26 is considered to be closest to the truth.
    10. gorefest7777 13 November 2015 09: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      these animals (and it’s hard to call them humans) started this vileness back in 1991, I remember how an article was published by some “psychologist” who claimed that Alexander Matrosov was crazy that no one in his right mind would voluntarily part with his life. These amphibians speak our language, but we must be clearly aware that these are enemies not only of the Russian World, they are enemies of the very innermost things that man himself glorified in his deeds since ancient times. This is not liberalism, this is bestiality multiplied by debauchery. unfortunately there is only one way out to deport them to the bright west, let them kiss their pedophiles, gays, etc., with the color of liberality.
  2. Glot 11 November 2015 07: 01 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Everyone earns "bread and butter" as he can. Those who are trying to rewrite certain historical moments, replace one with another, earn in this way. They themselves, or fulfilling the orders of our many "friends" are not the point. The bottom line is that these are enemies, and the attitude towards them should be appropriate.
    It seems like it was already proposed to introduce at the legislative level an article on the inadmissibility of revision and distortion of history. It's time, it's time to introduce. Enter and start attracting on it, giving a real term. Let them feed each other on felling sites.
    1. dmb
      dmb 11 November 2015 12: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And for this article we will send everyone to logging, or selectively? If everyone, then I'm afraid without the leadership of the country will remain. There, including it is not clear that the guaranteeing Guarantor, such is carried, that it does not smell of objective history. Examples of pharisaism lead, or themselves repeatedly convinced? Honestly read their assessments of Stalin's activities (by the way, I partially agree with them here).
      1. Glot 11 November 2015 12: 51 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        What do you suggest? Leave as is?
        1. dmb
          dmb 11 November 2015 13: 56 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Well, why, only if so all, all. Well, at least it will somehow coincide with the Constitution. By the way, if your “sensible” proposal passes, then I’m afraid to be the first to master the taiga is not at all Mironenko or the Brewers, and not the Echo editorial, but those who will write the historical truth about the arrival of the current “eminent state and public figures”. This is also the history of our country.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. dvg79 11 November 2015 13: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do you believe that the current government recognizing Katyn will defend the truth, and not sculpt matters on the patriots ??
  3. dedBoroded 11 November 2015 07: 01 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    it is necessary to brand such "historians" ...
    1. Turkir 11 November 2015 08: 45 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      it is necessary to brand such "historians" ...

      Yes, they are already branded, there is no place for a new brand ..
      This distortion of our story seems to be well paid. You yourself know who we are sitting in the media and on TV. They know how to write greyhounds.
      It is they who inspire us with the idea that in Germany there was no fascism, but there was Nazism, and fools are repeating this propaganda.
      We ourselves must increase our level of knowledge, including in our history.
      Otherwise, it will be different.
      1. marline 11 November 2015 09: 59 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Turkir
        It is they who inspire us with the idea that in Germany there was no fascism, but there was Nazism, and fools are repeating this propaganda.

        And what's the difference? ... I don’t think that our fathers and grandfathers knew the grades of g ... They just beat the Nazis and the Nazis without understanding the whole world - Russians, Ukrainians, Tatars, Uzbeks, Cossacks, Chechens ... Why many thanks and eternal glory to them ...
        As for the heroes, he’s like a simple soldier like Bernes: “with a medal for the city of Budapest”
        1. Turkir 11 November 2015 10: 32 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Who cares?.

          And what did I write? What is the difference?
          Honestly, I'm just surprised.
          After all, I wrote the same thing as you wrote.
          1. marline 11 November 2015 11: 24 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Yes, I'm sorry ...
      2. gunya 11 November 2015 12: 59 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Turkir (1) SU

        It is they who inspire us with the idea that in Germany there was no fascism, but there was Nazism, and fools are repeating this propaganda.


        If you delve into the subtleties, then in Italy there was fascism, and in Germany, national socialism was simply “Nazism”. By and large, things are of the same type and little distinguishable.
  4. Barakuda 11 November 2015 07: 06 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    My grandfathers would have bitten their throats with such “free historians”. am Fighters, People at the cost of life defended their homeland. And it doesn’t matter, one rifle for three or even one leaflet stuck .. And not out of fear or profit.
    Such liberals should be run into tanks (a smaller fin), so that later fingers wouldn’t hit the keyboard with trembling.
    1. perm23 11 November 2015 08: 12 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      These scribblers would be sent to the front in the trenches in 1941, there they would have written more than one trench. And we just need to know this scum and not let it disgrace Russia and our memory. Not one country would not allow anyone to dare to chase its heroes. Nobody, but we allow. Norway, Denmark, Poland, France quickly surrendered, but still they have their own heroes and no one there dares to write badly about them or seek out the truth or not. Here the power should be tough - to punish.
      1. Weyland 12 November 2015 01: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: perm23
        These scribblers would go to the front in the trenches in 1941


        no, better than the 42nd, and be sure to not earlier than July 28 - otherwise they would have run away ... smile
        (if you forgot - the famous order No. 227 was issued on July 28, 1942) soldier
  5. venaya 11 November 2015 07: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    historical fiction, they say, should not have a place in modern historical science

    Yes, modern science consists entirely of historical myths, only fertilized with evidence, and this is what enemies use. How great is the influence of history on people, it seems that it is already unnecessary to prove, therefore, it is necessary to treat this science with extreme caution, avoiding serious blunders in terms of both factual and evidence. And here on the site there are already many examples of free interpretation of individual events. One must always be on the alert in such a delicate matter.
  6. Koronik 11 November 2015 07: 10 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    “Why, our liberals, God forgive me,“ friends ”simply cannot reveal the cards and say that their task is not to squeeze out the historical truth, but to once again smear the memory of the Victory with mud, the principles themselves the sacrifice of the Russian (in the broad sense of the word) people, their desire for unity before a common misfortune. "
    I agree with the author.
  7. bulat 11 November 2015 07: 13 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    And how many unknown heroes and exploits? Eternal memory to all.
    1. patr 11 November 2015 08: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      My grandfather is missing!
      1. Koshak 11 November 2015 18: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The Kingdom of heaven! soldier hi
  8. Stinger 11 November 2015 07: 13 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Apple tree from Apple does not fall far. They would only write about opening their own "candle factory". As the highest liberal and global (not afraid of the word) value.
  9. Humpty 11 November 2015 07: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    These liberoids in their degenerate families can not figure out, but crap on the exploits of people. And why should they engage in debunking the myth of general frost, if “this” is creating the myth that they say the Soviet Union is the main culprit of the 2nd World War, which Stalin and Hitler agreed to start to exterminate the Jews.
    In Europe, for example, many publications write just that.
  10. Same lech 11 November 2015 07: 19 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    as they say, the creative intelligentsia, which decided to challenge the established and seemingly quite traditional information about certain periods of the existence of the Russian State


    Is this this or something ... this abortion victim recently made a scandal in the FSB reception room .... PR horseradish man .... 30 days now in the monkey has this PR.

    With such guys it’s the only way ... he immediately mocked him at the monkey ... court and a month of community service
    1. perm23 11 November 2015 08: 35 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Little is this attitude. And this would have to beat the eggs in the pre-trial detention center to the floor for real.
      1. Alexander Romanov 11 November 2015 08: 37 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: perm23
        And this would have to beat the eggs in the pre-trial detention center to the floor for real.

        I would cut it off.
        1. Weyland 12 November 2015 01: 45 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          I would cut it off.


          What for?!
          It is necessary as in Poland in the old days - to nail and put a knife nearby; won't want to die of hunger - he will cut off! laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. gunya 11 November 2015 13: 04 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      This “PR man” is not a month of “forced labor”, but a minimum of 5 years in fresh air to think about his actions without the right to parole.
  11. Sanitary 11 November 2015 07: 19 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    Go into yourself and the doctrine; do sim
    constantly: for, by doing so, you will save yourself and those who listen to you.

    Enough to listen to anyone, I’m sick of the vysers of the liberals pretty and for a long time. My grandmother was twice in occupation (now Kaluga Region), her eldest sister was evacuated (Omsk) with a factory, they collected weapons for the front, my wife was a partisan, my grandfather was 90 years old, I was in captivity twice. Although they do not like to talk about those times (especially grandfather), but I heard from them quite a bit about the Second World War. Yes, for some it’s the 2nd World War, but for me it’s the Great Patriotic War, which the whole Great Country embarked on, because they fought for their homeland!
  12. Kos_kalinki9 11 November 2015 07: 20 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    but wherever the soldier was, from now on he had to follow the example of the Panfilov, Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya, Alexander Matrosov without hesitation to die in the name of the MODE and on the orders of his commanders.

    The word is some kind of regime. According to liberals, the concept of Homeland and Fatherland for a Soviet person does not exist.
    1. gunya 11 November 2015 13: 07 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      For liberals of all stripes, the concepts of Homeland and Fatherland do not exist.
  13. sva180480 11 November 2015 07: 21 New
    • 20
    • 0
    +20
    These are not historians. They for what they rounded up what they write. There is such a profession to sell the homeland.
  14. sledge 11 November 2015 07: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Burn sedition with hot iron
  15. parusnik 11 November 2015 07: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The fact that any unproven episode of history must be removed from historical publications and publications, so that, you know, he would not mislead the younger generation...Hmm..interesting, it turns out the approach from the point of view of the Code of Criminal Procedure Article 14 Part 3. All doubts about the guilt of the accused (in our case Nazi Germany), which cannot be eliminated in the manner established by this Code (historical facts), are interpreted the benefit of the accused (Nazi Germany).
  16. sa-zz 11 November 2015 07: 29 New
    • 22
    • 0
    +22
    A new teacher comes to class:
    - My name is Abram Davidovich, I am a liberal. And now all get up in turns and introduce yourself just like me ...
    - My name is Masha, I am a liberal ...
    - My name is Stepa, I am a liberal ...
    - I am Little Johnny, I'm a Stalinist.
    - Little Johnny, why are you Stalinist ?! !
    - My mother is Stalinist, my father is Stalinist, my friends are Stalinists, and I, too, are Stalinist.
    - Little Johnny, and if your mother were a prostitute, your dad was a drug addict, and your friends were p.ed.k.a.m.i, who would you be then ?! !
    - Then I would be a liberal.
    1. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      sa-zz what do you mean by liberal?
  17. 1536 11 November 2015 07: 31 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The meaning is clear. It’s just that these free masons from history need to ask one question: Do you, gentlemen, acknowledge that the Red Army defeated German fascism, which brought death to all of humanity? If yes, then further conversation is pointless to continue, because Winners are not judged. And if “no,” listen, you are followers of fascism, you are fighting the foundations of our state and society. After that, they will conduct conversations with them in another place.
  18. rotmistr60 11 November 2015 07: 36 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Something recently has begun to show itself too actively "liberal" mold. Probably received new manuals from Washington and the question of grants is being decided. After the start of the operations of the videoconferencing system in Syria, these corrupt "free-thinking" aggressively climbed out of all the cracks. Here one cannot do without a folk remedy to combat such dishonesty.
    1. Svetlana 11 November 2015 08: 43 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      corrupt "free-thinking" aggressively climbed out of all the cracks. Here one cannot do without a folk remedy to combat such dishonesty.

      The folk remedy, I think, is "give pi ... yule."
  19. Same lech 11 November 2015 07: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    from Washington and the question of grants is being decided.


    Yes, it’s all the US Ambassador TEFT activated his agents among the liberals .... he urgently needs to register an enema on the carpet in our Foreign Ministry for other procedures.
  20. Bugor 11 November 2015 07: 44 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    One of my grandfathers went missing in the first battle. I should not assume that he died protecting the future ME?
    There would be no grandfathers, there would be us ...
    And just what they were - leave for academic science.
  21. Tatar 174 11 November 2015 07: 55 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    But these "historians" live among us, if I meet even one of them, then I’ll spoil the pediment to them completely ...
    1. perm23 11 November 2015 08: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Agree with you . they need to know them to spoil the pediment and pull out the language.
  22. Volga Cossack 11 November 2015 08: 08 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    hands off the history of My Homeland !!!! ready to ruin everything, one word liberals! to stifle these attempts in the bud - to such historians according to the article - for treason to the Motherland - to think of Toda. for ardor - sorry. I have the honor!
  23. Shurale 11 November 2015 08: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It's simple, the war continues with the Soviet Union. And why? Because while his last representative is still alive, the union is also alive. As long as those who remember him remain, the war will continue.

    And now the question is, did the USSR die so? They do not fight a dead enemy ...
    1. Darkness 11 November 2015 08: 17 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Our powers that are, to the snot, are even afraid of the thought of a revival of the Union. Because they understand - you’ll have to pay and not everyone can catch a plane to London in time.
  24. Mountain shooter 11 November 2015 08: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes, attempts to “debunk” historical myths have been and will be. But the people make legends, and believe in them not because propaganda works, but because, in a nightmare of constant defeats of the first period of the Second World War, they insanely wanted a positive example. So that those who have a core in the soul, rely on this example, in spite of everything, rested - and won.
  25. Darkness 11 November 2015 08: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    These "historians", unlike Yulin, Dyukov, etc. Have support at the very top. Desovetization is the goal of the current government.
  26. Corsair0304 11 November 2015 08: 26 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    This month the movie "28 Panfilov" will be released. Be sure to go myself and take my son too. The one who does not remember the past of his country has no future.
    1. foxstrat89 11 November 2015 09: 19 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Unfortunately, the film will be released only next year, the team working on the set does not have time to finish everything in the stated time frame. They promised to release a movie on the anniversary of the counteroffensive near Moscow. On November 16 only the trailer for the film appears. Waiting for
    2. _my opinion 11 November 2015 17: 41 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Corsair0304
      This month the movie "28 Panfilov" will be released. Be sure to go myself and take my son too. The one who does not remember the past of his country has no future.

      probably because of this (the release of this film) and screams intensified ... all that can not even imagine how 28 people could stop such forces of the Nazis ... and they could ...
      They want to "unearth the truth"? ... but the truth is that at the cost of heroic efforts our people defeated the Nazis !!!
      ... even one Man can be an irresistible force for example you do not have to go far:
      This famous photo in August 2008 circulated around the world newspapers.
      After the rout of the Georgian army, its retreating units regrouped and decided to return to Gori, but stumbled upon a Russian checkpoint. The photo shows how a soldier of the RF Armed Forces, at the ready with a machine gun, is opposing the motorized infantry of the Georgian Armed Forces, convoy officers threatened the machine gunner to get out of the way and let them in, to which they answered, "I’ll go. Then the media, who were moving with the column, tried to talk with the machine gunner, and they received the same answer. As a result, the column turned around and moved to where it came from.
      Foreign journalists then published an article entitled "300 is not necessary, one is enough."
      The hero of this photo is Bato Dashidorzhiev.
  27. Zomanus 11 November 2015 08: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What is bad is that these truth-loving guys write history books for our children and students. That's what they need to be weaned from in the first place.
  28. Tamanskiy 11 November 2015 08: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I wonder why these creatures are generally allowed to publish in our country ?! And again, the debunking of the myth of "Putin's censorship", which, it turns out - is not it ?!
    1. Darkness 11 November 2015 08: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      In Russia there is a desovetization.
    2. kalibr 11 November 2015 09: 16 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And why is it allowed to publish Fomenko's nonsense about Russia-Horde, which discovered America? And the Cossacks who built the pyramids in Giza?
  29. Svetlana 11 November 2015 08: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I always have a desire to simply give such clever people a face, and not to engage in polemics with them and to prove something.
  30. Mercury 11 November 2015 08: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As a single-celled, everything turns out. Since the Maidan of Ukraine, it is customary for us to hate the liberals of those who are for Western customs and ideas. Yes, and I am against this wave of liberalism. But somehow I won’t drive in. Putin didn’t comb himself to the left and did not renounce Orthodoxy, and the Communists, who had always cursed power, suddenly, on the wave of patriotism and the rise of Russia, began to type such people on the blackboard. Vaughn Zyuganov hugs even priests. And here on the forum there is a feeling that there are patriots and they are loyal to the Communists and all the rest are damned liberals. The Communists have a new tactic to use other people's achievements. We would like to do this like Putin. The Communists eat in the blood of Russians and here all in fact and no historical speculation.
    1. dvg79 11 November 2015 13: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      On liberals, this blood is orders of magnitude greater, in addition, the communists shed a lot of their own, in the interests of the people, and the liberals always preferred to pour someone else's in their selfish. Any anticommunist, by announcement, is a Russophobe by default.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. kotvov 11 November 2015 17: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The Communists eat in the blood of Russians and everything is in fact and there is no historical speculation. ,, and you count how many deaths on the conscience of shit and liberals in recent history.
  31. maikl50jrij 11 November 2015 08: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "Worst of all, he transfers this morality, including to modern man, shaping his militaristic attitude to the world and the agenda."

    These are the words of a person suffering from idiocy. Even the beast protects its lair. We are not starting a war, but we are finishing off the aggressor already in his lair! So it was, it is and it will be so! Is always! And all this stink (or the transmission of this stink) from their powerlessness. Yes, we are simple guys! So in terms of simplicity of our souls we can star so soulfully that for a long time later the "grunts" will be closed ... angry
  32. MATROSKIN-53 11 November 2015 08: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    These adherents of “free history” are ordinary Ivanes who do not remember kinship. I just want to spit them all in the snout and not lead any polemics!
  33. Sergey S. 11 November 2015 08: 57 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Another unpleasant moment of this discussion is the ease with which the modern man in the street with the ribbon of St. George undertakes to sing the death of his fathers, as if it was the death by order of the command that was the apotheosis of military glory and a wonderful personal realization. Worst of all, he transfers this morality, including to the modern man, forming his militaristic attitude to the world and the agenda.

    Something beyond.
    I don’t understand how the earth wears this geek.
    There is not a drop of politics proper.
    There is a manic desire to condemn the patriotism of our people.
    The reason is clear: once an apple tried to express the interests of a working intelligentsia. Did not work out. Working demagogues and Westerners do not like. Then the apple hoped for money bags. Again failed. The bags parted pocket lots without any brains at all, only with a party task, and scored bad boys there.

    And now mitrokhins strive to demonstrate that they are bad. The competition is serious. They will either set the FSB on fire without fear of a bullet in the forehead, or they will write an abomination about the death of our citizens, or they openly incite to action against the Motherland in the international arena ...

    In my opinion, this bastard must be judged. At least by a friendly court ... and flogging on the square of each city, where citizens can read the above abomination.
    So write down in the sentence: daily public daily spanking with a salt rod.
  34. sevtrash 11 November 2015 08: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is worth separating one from the other, everything will depend on how you view history, and, in fact, everything. If we consider from the standpoint of the ongoing struggle between the West (USA, etc.) and the East (USSR, Russia), there were or were not some events that did not matter, from the point of view of one side or another, they were / were not based solely on ideological prerequisites (like we are getting better). If they really were and there is evidence for that - all the better, no - well, so what. The winner writes the story, but depending on where, the winners are different, they may be in one institution, in one country / countries, or maybe in most countries. So the truth, one that is not at all true, about the same event can vary greatly in different minds. Within the family, even, or even above all. laughing The most interesting thing is that such a mind may well understand that the truth is, in fact, different, but it will still prove its position, because it is its own and at least profitable for itself. wassat
    And if we are talking about science, then: ... Science is an area of ​​human activity aimed at the development and systematization of objective knowledge about reality. The basis of this activity is the collection of facts ... In the most general sense, a scientific fact is an objective and verifiable observation ...
  35. Stas57 11 November 2015 09: 03 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    a few days ago I published a huge article on the Panfilov division, and where is it?
    I did not miss moderation, and then such materials appear here-- a. guard, liberals, help!


    please read an article unpublished here
    http://warspot.ru/4282-na-podstupah-k-moskve
    1. kalibr 11 November 2015 09: 25 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Read it. Very interesting material, although in my opinion fragments are thin. works could be omitted. Did you write this? The rest is great!
      1. Stas57 11 November 2015 10: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        no, it was written by xnumx of a large and honest historian
        1. kalibr 11 November 2015 10: 48 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Well, it doesn't matter. In principle, write on archival documents, having thoroughly studied the whole layer of evidence and counter-evidence.
          1. Stas57 11 November 2015 19: 35 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            which was done, the Topvar editor did not seem interested ...
  36. 31rus 11 November 2015 09: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Dear, everything is much deeper, the rejection and prohibition of ideology, the rejection of ideology, entailed precisely a “revision” of the entire ideological (and this is directly related to patriotism) basis, the Red Army already robbed and raped the poor Europeans, that's where the order came from, that's where first “rewrite”, then forget, an example even in our country we know a lot about the heroes of the First, about the heroes of Afghanistan, Chechnya, Chernobyl, here is the basis for “new discoveries” We need a law “on historical heritage”, clearly state what falsification is , distortion, deliberate concealment of facts and punishment, let this "historian" compensate for insulting all relatives of the deceased and the state, regardless of a citizen of Russia or another state, say "inquisition", but how to fight if the Nazis in the neighboring state are "heroes"
  37. press officer 11 November 2015 09: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    100 years will pass and historians will be crowded who will say that there was no battle on the Kursk Bulge and there was no Brest Fortress.



    Well, maybe not 100 years .. but less .. Here is Comrade Chubais senior vehemently speaks out everywhere that there was no "Blockade of Leningrad" at all! It is a myth! And why does he forget that their father (Chubais) fought just for the liberation of Leningrad ... maybe the wrong Leningrad was liberating? Or are the kids just dumb grown up?
    1. Weyland 12 November 2015 01: 56 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: press attache
      Or are the kids just dumb grown up?


      Why childrenand not a son? It's just that the family has its black sheep: the brother of the Red Cockroach, EMNIP, a perfectly sane person and the brother can not stand!
  38. Egoza 11 November 2015 09: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    For some reason, none of these "truth seekers" wants to clarify the facts, who wrote denunciations of people in order to debunk the myth of "Stalinist repression." Or is this myth suitable? Or is historical truth not needed here?
  39. Mercury 11 November 2015 09: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The truth does not depend on a change of ideology. Stupidly, the truth was hidden as much as they could. I do not need to search for truth in the archives. Our people already knew about the affairs of the Reds. I don’t know what could have happened in Europe in the forties. I know what they did in the civil war in our area, as well as the episode during the liberation of Rostov when one ardent communist reigned herself Zhanna Dark very early revealed our positions and the Germans killed them. This is all from the witnesses from the people who were there. This was spoken only by the most daring and quietly and only to their own.
    If you hide the truth, it will be discovered by children or grandchildren and it will be worse. We must admit mistakes and move on.
  40. Hardy 11 November 2015 09: 58 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I completely share the author’s attitude towards liberals, but ...

    But doesn't it seem strange to you that in almost all the propaganda examples of our heroic past, the main characters are killed? Our monuments are not triumphal arches or symbols of victory, but solid gravestones ... It’s not even clear how they actually won? It turns out that the liberals are right, they overwhelmed with meat?
    It is interesting, since when did this sacrifice begin to be so extolled with us? Is it not from Khrushchevsky, huh? When they joined the world economy, they started selling oil for bucks ... Then all these giant monuments began to be erected, right?

    Ask any person not a historian about the Great Patriotic War? What will immediately remember? The heroic defense of the Brest Fortress, Zoya, Panfilovtsev ...
    Where are our victories? And why actually the Second World War, and not the Second World War? What, the victory over Japan is not a reason for pride and eternal memory? For you, like "patriots" there is no Second World War, is there only WWII? Well then, be consistent, screw the Kuril Islands.)))) What, it became a pity right away? And why then do not you tell your children about these victories? Are you embarrassed to say because this does not correspond to the Western morality imposed by us?
    Personally, I am proud of how we destroyed the Japanese army in a matter of days. The first attacked and destroyed. And precisely because of this feat of Soviet soldiers, our allies, or, as is now customary to say, partners, did not then start the third world war against us.
    Do you really don’t understand where this sacrifice came from? Do you remember “catching up and overtaking America”? Like we are not already sort of winners, we are not the first in space, we do not have an advanced economy ... Yes, we need to catch up ...

    Of course, everything was done quite thinly. When in every family there are those who died in the war, it is easy to play on these feelings ... And at the same time, the inability to control the country will replace pathetics.

    Do you think our country was captured and destroyed in the 90s? Yes, no, it was with Khrushchev that it all started ... He certainly didn’t do it on purpose, as Gorbachev was possible ... Although this is already a slightly different topic ...


    I’m just wondering, with these examples, who do you want to grow from your children? The victim?
    1. 79057330785 11 November 2015 11: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I recall history lessons at school:
      Kosmodemyanskaya, Panfilovtsy, Sailors, Gastello, Molodogvardeytsy.-All died.
      But how many people know about the feat of the pilot Devyatayev, who stole Heinkel and took out his captured comrades. Why don't they know about this feat? Is it because the hero instead of awards and honors thundered into the camps.
      1. Insurgent LC 11 November 2015 16: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        in Soviet times, there was such a journal, Technique of Youth, so it regularly contained various articles on military subjects, described the deed of Devyatarev called the escape from the island of Usedom and the feat of 30 batteries over the defense of Sevastopol, and much more, more than one was written out of this magazine
        1. kalibr 11 November 2015 22: 39 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          He is still there, and not 12, but 14 numbers per year! And everything is printed there too ...
        2. THE_SEAL 12 November 2015 15: 09 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Insurgent LPR
          in Soviet times, there was such a journal, Technique of Youth, so it regularly contained various articles on military subjects, described the deed of Devyatarev called the escape from the island of Usedom and the feat of 30 batteries over the defense of Sevastopol, and much more, more than one was written out of this magazine

          I wrote out. And in my opinion a lot of people wrote out. But the magazine was interesting precisely in Soviet times. After the 91st year, reading became impossible.
      2. Egevich 11 November 2015 19: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: 79057330785
        I recall history lessons at school:
        Kosmodemyanskaya, Panfilovtsy, Sailors, Gastello, Molodogvardeytsy.-All died.
        But how many people know about the feat of the pilot Devyatayev, who stole Heinkel and took out his captured comrades. Why don't they know about this feat? Is it because the hero instead of awards and honors thundered into the camps.

        who doesn't know something? who can’t read?
        Well, yes, well, for 2 months I was on a special check ...
        yes, yes, yes, in 1972 his book Flight to the Sun was published in a print run of 150 copies ...
        Please do not hesitate to check the information that you want to convey to the erring and ignorant ...

        at least take a look at the wiki or something ...
      3. Stas57 11 November 2015 19: 38 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        But how many people know about the feat of the pilot Devyatayev, who stole Heinkel and took out his captured comrades. Why don't they know about this feat? Is it because the hero instead of awards and honors thundered into the camps.

        In November 1945, Devyatayev was sacked. In 1946, having a diploma of the captain of the vessel, he got a job as a duty officer at the station in the Kazan river port. In 1949 he became the captain of the boat [9], and later one of the first who headed the crews of the very first Russian hydrofoil ships - Rocket and Meteor.
        Mikhail Devyatayev lived in Kazan until his last days. Worked while forces allowed. In the summer of 2002, during the filming of a documentary about him, he arrived at the airport in Peenemuende, lit candles for his comrades and met with the German pilot G. Hobom.

        Grave of Devyatayev at Arskoye cemetery
        Mikhail Devyatayev buried in Kazan
      4. Weyland 12 November 2015 02: 02 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: 79057330785
        Is it because the hero instead of awards and honors thundered into the camps.


        2 months in filtration camp - this is a common practice for those who escaped from captivity: there is always a risk that he was recruited. Unpleasant, humiliating - but necessary - war is war!
        And the rumors about the "15 years of the camps" he received are just liberal propaganda from the series of "one billion personally executed by Stalin" laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. crazy_fencer 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      No need to dramatize. And then the question immediately arises: what to do with Pokryshkin, Kozhedub, Marinesko, Lunin, and many more who returned from the war alive, and this did not prevent them from remaining famous heroes.
      1. kalibr 11 November 2015 13: 37 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        And Marinesko to sit in prison for theft ... what did he steal there?
        1. Colonel 11 November 2015 20: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: kalibr
          what did he steal there?

          And here they inserted their five cents? He stole nothing. He was too independent and honest. For which they framed.
          1. kalibr 11 November 2015 22: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And here, five cents? I read a book about him, a ridiculous sentence to such a hero. And no one interceded, however. And what does too honest mean?
            Too honest to be impossible! You can be either honest or dishonest. You can not be a little pregnant!
            1. Colonel 13 November 2015 19: 38 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: kalibr
              You can't be too honest!

              actually written
              He was too independent and honest.
    4. 3axap82 12 November 2015 13: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Man, my respect to you. For your thoughts.
      "At the same time, the inability to rule the country replaces with pathetics."
      Before, under Khrushchev, it sounded like “If only there was no war!”
      Now housewives say, "Although bad, bombs do not fall!" Why they should fall, and who can dare to drop them is incomprehensible.
  41. Landwarrior 11 November 2015 10: 15 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Myths to debunk gathered? am So at first the order would be put in order in historical science! am When it was necessary to write books on history, professors, scientists were engaged in repetition, earned money, and then when they began to spit on the Rezun exams, they realized it, but it was too late. fool
    As they started pouring all sorts of pseudo-historical slops during the Catastrophe, the "truth-tellers" of the fig are pouring am
  42. alstr 11 November 2015 10: 30 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Another unpleasant moment of this discussion is the ease with which the modern man in the street with the ribbon of St. George undertakes to sing the death of his fathers, as if it was the death by order of the command that was the apotheosis of military glory and a wonderful personal realization. Worst of all, he transfers this morality, including to the modern man, forming his militaristic attitude to the world and the agenda.


    In fact, this is exactly what you need to educate your children so that they can give their life for the sake of others if necessary. In this case, by order or not - there is not much difference. There is no difference in the names of the heroes. There is no difference in the place and time of the feat. In this case, it doesn’t matter whether the Panfilov’s feat was accomplished in this place or not. In another place, and not at all Pavfilov’s accomplished a similar feat. And how many unknown or little known similar cases? Weight. And not only the initial stage of the war. At the end of the war, there were also enough cases when a small group delayed the Germans' counteroffensive at the cost of their death.

    This is not important. It is important that the description of such cases (albeit not entirely reliable and largely collective) encouraged others to perform their exploits or even simply not to run.

    In this sense, it is very good to recall two songs:
    "At an unknown height" and "From the heroes of bygone days."

    "From the heroes of bygone days
    Sometimes there are no names left.
    Those who have taken mortal combat
    They became just earth and grass.
    Only their terrible valor
    Settled in the hearts of the living
    This eternal fire,
    We bequeathed one,
    We store in the chest. "


    "There were only three of us
    Of the eighteen guys.

    How many of them, good friends,
    Lying is left in the dark
    At an unfamiliar settlement
    At an unnamed height.
    At an unfamiliar settlement
    At an unnamed height. "
    1. Weyland 12 November 2015 02: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: alstr
      In this sense, it is very good to recall two songs: "At an unknown height" and "From the heroes of bygone days."


      I would add a third: "At the village of Kryukovo." Fortunately, based on real facts.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  43. afrikanez 11 November 2015 10: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I wonder why these “historians” are still looked through with their fingers? recourse
  44. Epifan 11 November 2015 10: 48 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Concerned "liberals", and frankly speaking, the fifth column and enemies of the people. During a certain period of our history, this led to bad consequences. And therefore, given the experience of another period, the reptile needs to be crushed. Nobody will say anything good. Not "civilized" Europe, nor the inner party with characteristic surnames.
  45. crazy_fencer 11 November 2015 11: 40 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The author of the article narrowed the problem somewhat to Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya and 28 Panfilov’s. In fact, the campaign of deliberate slander of military feat during the Great Patriotic War did not begin yesterday, and has a much wider character. They went through all those who for decades have been an example for the younger generation: Marinesco, Gastello, and Alexander Matrosov. Lunin began to interfere with dirt back in the 50s. Rummaging around on the Internet - a lot of things can be found in this regard.
    The author deservedly kicks "free historians", referring to only one specific person. I do not know. In my opinion, a country should know its heroes. The campaign of the "myth of 28 Panfilovites" was actively promoted by the Director of the State Archive Sergei Mironenko. This is nothing like a post. A thorough and detailed analysis of how this happened can be found here: http://niramas.livejournal.com/33993.html
    What for? Or, as the ancient Romans said: “Qui prodest?”
    This question is answered in some detail here: http://photonoid.livejournal.com/31668.html
    I highly recommend for those who want to reasonably beat the heads of such liberal "historians" to familiarize themselves with these materials in full. Although I immediately warn: “Mnogabukaff”, - therefore, it’s better not to get used to thinking of advertising slogans there. For the first publication I have cited consists of three parts, the second of six.
  46. Buffalo 11 November 2015 11: 57 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The Fifth Column received a mobilization order. Iron Shurik (maiden name - Nevzorov), a kept woman and a chain dog of Berezovsky, said that he had ceased to be Russian.
    Political prostitute, you have never been Russian, if in your blood - 1/4 Tatar!
    Zhvanetsky openly declared that he was dreaming of destroying Russia (before that he had saved innocence!), The old "goat"!
    How many of them, such, in Russia and neighboring countries are fattening!
    It would be time for such a furnace!
    1. AVATA-ta-R-in 11 November 2015 13: 47 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well, I'm Tatar, so what? What is the boundary between you and me?
    2. Weyland 12 November 2015 02: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Bison
      Political prostitute, you have never been Russian, if in your blood - 1/4 Tatar!


      Sometimes the soul is so hard
      What can hit her nothing can.
      May the wind of death be colder than ice
      He will not disturb the petals of the soul.

      A proud smile shines again with a smile.
      And forgetting the vanity of the world
      Again I want, without knowing the barriers,
      Write, write, write, not tired.

      Let my minutes be numbered
      Let the executioner wait for me and dig a grave,
      I'm ready for anything. But I still need
      The paper is white and black ink!

      The author of these verses is 100% a Tatar named Musa Jalil. Hero of the Soviet Union (posthumous). Guillotined in fascist captivity for participating in an underground organization of prisoners of war.
  47. An64 11 November 2015 12: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    At all times, historians served the state ideology: in the tsarist - tsarist, in the Soviet - Soviet, now United Russia ... There is nothing wrong with that and nothing good is a fact. History is deliberately distorted in order to show the "correctness" of the existing system. This is being done with us, this is being done both in the west and in the east.
    To operate only with archival documents and proven facts is, in my opinion, good. But, unfortunately, not many people will be able to figure this out and build a relationship between historical events. Therefore, the facts "dress" in politics and are conveyed to us by historians. How many ideologies in the world, so many will be "historical truths." There is nothing you can do about it.
    1. Hardy 11 November 2015 13: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: An64
      At all times, historians served the state ideology: in the tsarist - tsarist, in the Soviet - Soviet, now United Russia ... There is nothing wrong with that and nothing good is a fact.

      Small clarification. In Soviet times, ideology changed several times. United Russia ideology is very reminiscent of the Soviet era of Khrushchev. When real actions were replaced by populism, propaganda, and eventually led to collapse.
    2. Sober 12 November 2015 17: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Everyone adjusts the truth for themselves, considering the facts through the prism of their personal hatred of someone or something.
  48. chunga-changa 11 November 2015 13: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Whatever the case, however liberals and patriots would not howl at each other’s ears and wouldn’t spit in their souls — these are their problems. Everyone who died defending their homeland has the right to truthfully cover their role. Descendants are simply obliged to understand how everything was in reality.
  49. AVATA-ta-R-in 11 November 2015 13: 45 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    in 1999, after a demobilization for the new year, I bought a computer and, accordingly, different games, there was a game there a medal of honor — my deceased grandfather, a veteran of the war (left to be a 43-17-year-old volunteer), learned to play and went through the whole series of games except the last one -Died in 2011. I saw for myself-give him now a real opportunity to shoot at the Germans again, he will forget about the age of the disease, forget about the family and go to fight again - he had at the subconscious level how many times he saw the German, so much and kill. my question is that the grandfather said that he didn’t fight grandfather in response, 27 men and 2 women left the clan for the front — 2 (only my great-grandfather and grandfather) returned and that I (the Nazis) should pray? in order to oppose mitrofanushki and you just need to remember the history of the family — remember not only May 9th about the great-grandfathers of grandfathers — the sons of the grandchildren of the daughters should already be pulled to the museum and the gym — the son was 5 years old — that year went to his relatives in Kursk, were in museums and diramas 4 years was, but still in my head something will be postponed - sorry for the confusion
  50. Rich-ksy 11 November 2015 13: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Such "free" historians will be the first to run to the adversary, to ask for a "label for reigning"