Military Review

French Air Force struck in Syria on oil installations controlled by IG

68
French aircraft in Syria bombarded oil facilities controlled by terrorists, reports Look with reference to the head of the Ministry of Defense of France Le Drian.


Archive photo

"The French Air Force on Sunday attacked a militant oil facility in eastern Syria near the border with Iraq," the minister said.

On the effects of air strikes are not reported.

The newspaper reminds that last week the French government announced the direction to the Middle East of a "group of ships led by the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle." At the same time, the leader of the National Front, Marine Le Pen, stated that “in an attempt to resolve the crisis in Syria, the Elysée Palace should be aligned with Moscow, which led the armed struggle against the Islamic State”.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. teron
    teron 10 November 2015 10: 20 New
    46
    The French need to join us or not to bomb at all. The Syrian authorities did not call them, and they seem to be not in a coalition with the Americans. Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 10 November 2015 10: 23 New
      +5
      What, the Nomand Neman squadron appeared? wink
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 10 November 2015 10: 30 New
        28
        attacked an oil militant facility in eastern Syria near the border with Iraq
        A weak? Bomb oil facilities on the border with Turkey? BUT? Those. exactly what you need to stop oil smuggling! Oh no! it's your own!
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 10 November 2015 10: 39 New
          +9
          Quote: Baikonur
          A weak bombing of oil facilities on the border with Turkey? AND!


          Taken. In the northeast - the Americans, in the northwest, in the center and the southwest - ours. (cry.)
        2. Good me
          Good me 10 November 2015 10: 52 New
          12
          Quote: Baikonur
          A weak? Bomb oil facilities on the border with Turkey? BUT? Those. exactly what you need to stop oil smuggling! Oh no! it's your own!


          Of course, "I will bring on anger", "but someone needs to write about it ...

          How often, or rather, AT ALL, have we come across reports from our General Staff on such airstrikes?

          It seems not. If I'm wrong, correct it.

          There is practically no information about the application of airstrikes to our aerospace forces aimed at undermining the economic and financial component of ISIS ...

          But Chechnya has taught that it’s not enough to physically destroy the militants. It is much more efficient to stop the flow of their funding, in order to maximize the “nullification” of their ability to carry out illegal actions.
          1. Yuyuka
            Yuyuka 10 November 2015 11: 04 New
            +7

            How often, or rather, AT ALL, have we come across reports from our General Staff on such airstrikes?


            there is no point in destroying what needs to be restored - this is if the goal of returning the territories is real, but for now there is hope for it. If this is a lost territory and the enemy is advancing, everything is destroyed so that "the enemy does not get it." Recall the Great Patriotic War - retreating, we destroyed everything that we could, the Germans did the same. The Allies bombed Dresden, we saved Krakow. But the approaches have not changed! Now the French are destroying the infrastructure, then the Americans will join them. Everything goes the beaten path. Second front however request
            1. Good me
              Good me 10 November 2015 11: 20 New
              +3
              Quote: Yuyuka
              there is no point in destroying what needs to be restored


              Okay, the oil fields and other Syrian infrastructure will be “put out of the box” ...

              But it is not enough to pump oil from the bowels, it is also necessary to DELIVER it to the buyer. And here the ISIS ersatz oil pipelines to Turkey, caravans of oil tank cars are just “popping up”.

              For a long time, in a dispute with Israeli comrades, the question was raised about the financial component of ISIS, and about possible sources of income (primarily oil). And then, the Western Saudi coalition, users reproached that they are not struggling with this component.

              Now, in Syria, we are practically the only force, relying on the SAA, which has assumed the responsibility and work to destroy ISIS ...

              SO LET'S SAME, MEET.
              1. g1v2
                g1v2 10 November 2015 12: 52 New
                +2
                I came across infa that Assad and Ig unofficially agreed not to bomb each other's energy objects. And ours and ig plan to capture them and do not want to restore them later. So ig do not strike at the electric power facilities of the sars, and Assad does not bombard thermal power plants and oil facilities ig. If this is violated - ig will simply turn off the electricity in a large part of Aleppo, for example. Also, buses and people move across the borders of sar and ig. Accordingly, the states and their sidekicks are now striking precisely at this infrastructure - oil production and thermal power plants, because they are doing this ayayai and ig and asada. In addition, oil production is far from the main source of financing ig. The main ones are help from abroad, taxes on a controlled one and robbery of non-believers. By the way, ig introduces its currency already.
            2. Temples
              Temples 10 November 2015 11: 24 New
              +3
              How often, or rather, AT ALL, have we come across reports from our General Staff on such airstrikes?

              Oil is not possible. And you can’t buy weapons for oil.
              Need money.
              That's who gives the money and you need to "bomb".
              The dumbest excuse - ISIS sells oil and lives on these funds.
              Whoever buys from ISIS is the main ally of the terrorists.
              No oil will just contain ISIS.
              ISIS - performers !!!
              And to destroy infrastructure is an extreme measure. I agree with Yuyuka.
              1. Good me
                Good me 10 November 2015 11: 37 New
                +2
                Quote: Temples
                That's who gives the money and you need to "bomb".
                The dumbest excuse - ISIS sells oil and lives on these funds.
                Whoever buys from ISIS is the main ally of the terrorists.


                Buyer No. 1, Turkey, NATO member ... Do you propose to "bomb" them?

                Like an elephant in a china shop?

                Isn’t it easier, by airstrikes, to simply interrupt the smuggling channels for pumping oil without leaving the territory of Syria and the framework of the counter-terrorist operation of the aerospace forces?
                1. Yuyuka
                  Yuyuka 10 November 2015 15: 23 New
                  0

                  Isn’t it easier, by airstrikes, to simply interrupt the smuggling channels for pumping oil without leaving the territory of Syria and the framework of the counter-terrorist operation of the aerospace forces?


                  Vooot .... for this with four hands "for"! I think ours are working in this direction, the question so far is most likely in more important priorities. And most likely the IG is an excuse - the sale of oil, the main funding for "good behavior" - like WinniePuh; "I give you immediately" these wonderful 50 tons wassat
            3. am808s
              am808s 10 November 2015 11: 24 New
              +3
              I agree the bombardment of oil wells is more harmful to Syria than to the IG. Barmaley vse vse khan and have to restore the people. So khafufuzy - uninvited guests who want Syria to stay in ruins longer. That's the true face of their help!
          2. serega1512
            serega1512 10 November 2015 11: 23 New
            0
            maybe our fathers are reinsured commanders, such as knock out militants without damaging the oil rig, so that later they wouldn’t build new ones in return for the blown up
            ! who knows what there really is!
          3. region58
            region58 10 November 2015 12: 01 New
            +1
            Quote: Good I
            How often, or rather, AT ALL, have we come across reports from our General Staff on such airstrikes?

            It seems not. If I'm wrong, correct it.

            There were reports that the bridge was bombed through which oil was transported ... Pipelines smuggled - spend bombs on a piece of plastic pipe? It is doubtful ... And if you set fire to oil (the same wells), you won’t see nifig behind the smoke ... where are you going to throw bombs?
            PS Maybe they specifically to harm our? About smoke and about fires, I mean.
          4. Karlovar
            Karlovar 10 November 2015 15: 02 New
            0
            The neftyanka will still be useful to the peaceful economy of Syria ... Although, most likely, when the IS is over, the bearded men themselves will explode, in the worst case, the coalition62 will be bombed (by analogy with Dresden) ....
        3. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 10 November 2015 11: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: Baikonur
          attacked an oil militant facility in eastern Syria near the border with Iraq
          A weak? Bomb oil facilities on the border with Turkey? BUT? Those. exactly what you need to stop oil smuggling! Oh no! it's your own!


          Do you think they bomb ISIS? They bombed what should soon come under the control of Syria.
      2. Drёma
        Drёma 10 November 2015 10: 35 New
        10
        Alas, "Normandy ..." is dumb. Long.
        And now - some travel frogs
        in the wings.
      3. nadezhiva
        nadezhiva 10 November 2015 11: 11 New
        0
        Quote: teron
        Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard.
        The British complained that their "bubble" does not let go wink The French slipped through.
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        What, the Nomand Neman squadron appeared? wink
        Apparently yes.
    2. V.ic
      V.ic 10 November 2015 10: 26 New
      +4
      Quote: teron
      The Syrian authorities did not call them,

      Syria, by the way, is their former "mandated! Territory."
      Quote: teron
      and they don’t seem to be in a coalition with the Americans.

      Syndrome of the former great power, because "where a horse with a hoof, there is cancer with a claw."
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 10 November 2015 10: 31 New
      +3
      We need to declare the sky of Syria a no-fly zone.
      1. PQ-18
        PQ-18 10 November 2015 10: 45 New
        +4
        We need to declare the sky of Syria a no-fly zone.

        To do this, a number of military-technical measures should be carried out that would ensure control of the "no-fly zone". Otherwise, this announcement will be an empty shock to the Syrian air. The group of Russian air forces (air defense) is local and not powerful enough, and is based on one airfield (+ base of the Navy).
        Putin’s “method” consists in gradually squeezing out both militants on the ground and their masters from Syrian airspace by alternating air-ground strikes and appealing to international law through the UN.
    4. Finches
      Finches 10 November 2015 10: 45 New
      +1
      "French planes in Syria bombarded oil facilities controlled by terrorists ..." - (and read between the lines) - but did not hit! laughing
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 10 November 2015 11: 48 New
        +5
        Quote: Finches
        "French planes in Syria bombarded oil facilities controlled by terrorists ..." - (and read between the lines) - but didn’t hit!

        And here is a visual aid ....
    5. veksha50
      veksha50 10 November 2015 10: 50 New
      +3
      Quote: teron
      The French need to join us or not to bomb at all. The Syrian authorities did not call them, and they seem to be not in a coalition with the Americans



      It’s just that the French, as in the results of World War 2, wanted to be among the winners again ...
      1. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 10 November 2015 15: 38 New
        +1
        Yeah, as Keitel said before signing the act of surrender, pointing to the French - "How ?! And these also defeated us ?!"
    6. serega1512
      serega1512 10 November 2015 11: 18 New
      0
      the courtyard is a checkpoint, but where you don’t have to fly too far)) the air defense units that arrived there with our airplanes are clearly not asleep if, what’s wrong, right away wink
      1. amirbek
        amirbek 10 November 2015 11: 30 New
        +4
        Quote: serega1512
        French Air Force attacks militants' oil facility in eastern Syria on Sunday

        oh hard job with a french pilot
    7. volot-voin
      volot-voin 10 November 2015 11: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: teron
      Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard

      That's why the S-300, so that no matter who flies ... Especially who was not called.
    8. Vladimir 1964
      Vladimir 1964 10 November 2015 11: 46 New
      +2
      Quote: teron
      The French need to join us or not to bomb at all. The Syrian authorities did not call them, and they seem to be not in a coalition with the Americans. Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard.


      Competent thought, dear teron. And the absence of any diplomatic reaction from both Russia and Syria is somewhat surprising. It turns out that whoever wants, and what he wants to bomb in Syria. Okay, we weren’t there, it would be clear, but now we are there and the political alignment has changed, why is there no adequate reaction to the actions of the same French aviation unauthorized by anyone?
    9. marinier
      marinier 10 November 2015 11: 51 New
      +5
      They’ll write more 4, ASK for permission. AT RUSSIA!
      Kdet e all children of kindness were several Messiahs ago,
      to V.K.S. RUSSIA?
      And I’ll write the Libyan version of the IDA. But there it was!
      Suddenly, where doesn’t it come from?
      That's right mrs! Without you, the world would be a wild, wild west.
      Priatno sees you in the world-surrender case.
      I have assured you much of Europe in Europe.

      P.S. Ziv spirit, Ziva RUSSIA, to spite all ne4ist !!!
      1. region58
        region58 10 November 2015 12: 10 New
        +1
        What are you minus a person? According to the profile from the Netherlands. With Russian, not really, but you can understand the idea.
    10. sherp2015
      sherp2015 10 November 2015 13: 00 New
      +1
      Quote: teron
      The French need to join us or not to bomb at all. The Syrian authorities did not call them, and they seem to be not in a coalition with the Americans. Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard.


      I also thought about it, like Assad did not ask them ...
      As without asking in someone else's garden?
      it’s not a sin to bring down such boors, because they ... (wounds) .. they can get into the wrong place and bombard normal objects. Where is the air defense?
    11. Region-25.rus
      Region-25.rus 10 November 2015 14: 39 New
      -1
      It seems to me that it will be the same as in the 45th when signing the surrender by Germany - "what !? and they also defeated us?!? !!" (c)
  2. kimanas
    kimanas 10 November 2015 10: 21 New
    0
    And what prevented the "coalition" from doing this earlier?
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 10 November 2015 10: 40 New
      10
      Quote: kimanas
      And what prevented the "coalition" from doing this earlier?

      Previously, there were other plans, but now we need to destroy the entire infrastructure so that Assad would not get it! hi
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 10 November 2015 10: 51 New
        +3
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        Previously, there were other plans, but now we need to destroy the entire infrastructure so that Assad would not get it!


        Ahead. Think correctly. yes
  3. Tor5
    Tor5 10 November 2015 10: 21 New
    -6
    This is reasonable! Deprive igil financial support.
    1. TVM - 75
      TVM - 75 10 November 2015 10: 28 New
      20
      They are destroying the economic potential of Syria. It is necessary to destroy the IGilovites, not the enterprises. The Syrian government did not invite these warriors. Their task is to ruin Russia.
    2. Mareman Vasilich
      Mareman Vasilich 10 November 2015 10: 31 New
      14
      They do not deprive ISIS of oil, but Assad. It would be better if they beat ISIS, rather than infrastructure. In addition to oil, they have a shaft for there are those who give this money.
    3. tomket
      tomket 10 November 2015 10: 37 New
      +7
      Quote: Tor5
      This is reasonable! Deprive igil financial support.

      To deprive ISIS of financial support, you need to bomb Turkey and eliminate the son of Erdogan, who is engaged in ISIS oil.
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 10 November 2015 10: 54 New
        +2
        Quote: tomket
        To deprive ISIS of financial support, you need to bomb Turkey


        Um ... Turkey is a puppy, a daughter of a dog ... It is necessary to destroy the mad dog itself ...
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 November 2015 10: 23 New
    +3
    Wow! Oland decided to hit the IGilovtsev on the very sick - in the wallet. And he is not afraid of answers? So how will cars start burning all over Paris ...
  5. ZKVR
    ZKVR 10 November 2015 10: 23 New
    -6
    And what prevented us from doing this?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Sergey Medvedev
      Sergey Medvedev 10 November 2015 10: 31 New
      +9
      Quote: ZKVR
      And what prevented us from doing this?


      I suppose that there were intentions to free these oil facilities from terrorists and their activities are already in Syria’s income. To do this, they must be taken intact. And the French destroy them, neither ISIS nor Syria. Ours hit ISIL oil supply routes to Turkey, bombed the bridge.
      1. venaya
        venaya 10 November 2015 10: 37 New
        +6
        Quote: Sergey Medvedev
        there were intentions to liberate these oil facilities from terrorists and their activities are already in Syria’s income. To do this, they must be taken intact. And the French destroy them, neither ISIS nor Syria. Ours hit ISIL oil supply routes to Turkey, bombed the bridge.

        Apparently the French need to create a process of prolonged impoverishment of the population of Syria. They do not need Syria, they need to follow the instructions of the owner, and which, we will see later.
      2. Tra-ta-ta
        Tra-ta-ta 10 November 2015 10: 40 New
        +3
        And I suppose that everything is painted there: to whom and what to bomb ..
        Monopolies begin to divide the world "in strength." Today's events in the Middle East are a vivid confirmation of this.
        http://finobzor.ru/show-279-valentin-katasonov-monopolii-nachinayut-delit-mir-po
        -sile.html
      3. Karlovar
        Karlovar 10 November 2015 15: 15 New
        0
        In its purest form, Dresden ...
    3. Curculum
      Curculum 10 November 2015 10: 45 New
      +4
      Quote: ZKVR
      And what prevented us from doing this?

      The question is not correct initially: they created ISIS, gave (and give) it arms and capture objects that generate income and are located on the territory of a recognized state, and now, under the guise of fighting the created ISIS, they destroy these objects. In the end, it turns out they are struggling with the state Syria - and this is just not acceptable to us, since we are recognized the state is not fighting.
    4. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 10 November 2015 11: 46 New
      +3
      Quote: ZKVR
      And what prevented us from doing this?

      We destroyed the bridge over the Euphrates, through which the Igilovsky transit of oil went, thereby cutting off its sales in this direction. The mattress coalition has not “seen” this bridge for more than a year. What is the use of producing oil if it is impossible to sell. But we saved the oil rigs for Syria.
      Frogs and mattresses are ruining the oil field in those territories that could soon get out of the control of the Ishilovites, thereby deliberately hindering the restoration of the Syrian economy.
  6. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 10 November 2015 10: 25 New
    0
    - And along the road, the dead with braids stand! And silence!
    - Nonsense!
  7. Same lech
    Same lech 10 November 2015 10: 25 New
    +4
    The location of the object, its true purpose and the result of the bombing are not clear ...
    in general, this statement is very different from the statements of the representative of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

    Maybe the French bombed a watchman’s doghouse near this facility and gave it as a fight against ISIS ... one fog in an article ..
  8. SAM 5
    SAM 5 10 November 2015 10: 32 New
    +3
    French Air Force on Sunday attacks militants' oil facility in eastern Syria near Iraqi border

    You can attack even to us.rachki, but where is the result?
    On the effects of air strikes are not reported.

    Otag!
  9. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 10 November 2015 10: 33 New
    0
    elephant in a china shop
    It would be nice for the French authorities to learn to behave in a foreign country in accordance with respect for the owners, and not like an elephant in a china shop!
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 10 November 2015 12: 09 New
      +1
      like this?
  10. Fight cat
    Fight cat 10 November 2015 10: 49 New
    +1
    I won’t be surprised if a couple of mirages and typhoons fall that invade Syria’s airspace, we’ll write everything off to Isil’s militants! bully
  11. sergej30003
    sergej30003 10 November 2015 10: 49 New
    +3
    most likely these territories will soon come under the control of the Syrian Army, therefore they undermine the economy of the state, the French are an independent state and they do everything with the submission of Washington, which they used to prevent from undermining Isil, cutting off financing and not buying up cheap oil, a clean policy against Syria and its coalition
  12. DMB3000
    DMB3000 10 November 2015 10: 49 New
    +1
    they bomb that which can pass into the hands of government forces without destruction. the main thing that Assad would not get
  13. Batia
    Batia 10 November 2015 10: 50 New
    0
    Yes! - exclaimed Vorobyaninov. Much easier to bomb production (MANPADS no te).
  14. veksha50
    veksha50 10 November 2015 10: 51 New
    +3
    "bombarded oil facilities, controlled by terroristat"...

    Is it really ???
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 10 November 2015 10: 56 New
      +1
      Is it really ???


      The main thing no evidence was presented to the world ...
      one unfounded statement.
  15. individual
    individual 10 November 2015 10: 56 New
    +1
    Destroyed excavators, motorcycles, and oil rigs controlled by bandits are good.
    The main thing is to stop the replenishment of militants with manpower.
  16. Silman1985
    Silman1985 10 November 2015 10: 57 New
    +3
    I’m wondering why the world community doesn’t “star” that the Franks are bombing civilians ????? Russia has just not been accused of anything (((I believe this is at least not fair, although they are trying to make the information war and Russia an aggressor.
  17. Dr.
    Dr. Stein 10 November 2015 10: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: teron
    The French need to join us or not to bomb at all. The Syrian authorities did not call them, and they seem to be not in a coalition with the Americans. Now the Syrian sky in general has become like a passage yard.

    Yeah, soon you will have to set traffic lights in the sky of Syria)))
  18. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 November 2015 11: 01 New
    +7
    Americans in power plants and substations, the French suddenly became concerned about oil fields. But the result is one - to destroy as many Syrian infrastructure facilities as possible. The same tactics were followed by American students - punitive in the Donbass. What we cannot take, it is necessary to destroy it to the ground.
  19. 31rus
    31rus 10 November 2015 11: 01 New
    +3
    Dear, in my opinion this is generally the first blow to an oil facility, neither the VKS, nor the coalition bombed these facilities, which is rather strange for both sides, because even when they leave, the terrorists will either blow up or burn down towers and factories, so maybe the French were mistaken?
    1. amba balamut 77
      amba balamut 77 10 November 2015 11: 25 New
      +1
      And if they won’t let me leave? Do you think it’s easier to save the infrastructure by beating it off from the Ishilovites, or by recapturing from the Ishilov’s what remains after the bombing? Before the war, the main source of income for the Syrians was the oil industry. After the war, the work and without the paddling hoo will be galloping. Thanks to the women of the igil.
  20. serezhasoldatow
    serezhasoldatow 10 November 2015 11: 08 New
    +1
    They bombed the infrastructure, then they will restore it. In the spirit of the allies of World War II.
  21. Rostislav
    Rostislav 10 November 2015 11: 11 New
    +7
    There is practically no information about the application of airstrikes to our aerospace forces aimed at undermining the economic and financial component of ISIS ...

    There is such information, you just missed the message.
    Ours solved the issue of stopping the transportation of oil much more elegantly - destroyed the bridge over the Euphrates, which was used to transport oil products. The Syrians did not succeed in doing this. And the very next day after that, the Americans struck at the fields, the transportation of oil from which became impossible.
    For 1,5 years, excavators in the desert bombed, and then suddenly they found the “right” target, s-draggers. Now Assad is also recovering the wells.
    And what to take from the paddling pool? They ran the master’s example to follow, also engaged in the destruction of the country's infrastructure.
    As soon as the Syrians manage to take control of the border with Turkey and block the distribution channels for oil and oil products, the Americans will immediately begin to actively bomb the wells under the pretext of combating terrorist financing.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 10 November 2015 12: 56 New
      -1
      "As soon as the Syrians will be able to take control of the border with Turkey" ////

      This is still a long way off. While the border with Turkey is entirely
      under the control of fighters.
      And Assad does not control the oil fields anywhere. And it’s better to bomb them
      than to endure that enemies profit from them.

      What did the Soviet authorities do during the retreats
      during WWII? Destroyed the infrastructure so that
      it could not be used by the Nazis.
      And here the oil rigs captured by the enemy, for some reason, cannot be destroyed ...
  22. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 10 November 2015 11: 17 New
    +1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Americans in power plants and substations, the French suddenly became concerned about oil fields. But the result is one - to destroy as many Syrian infrastructure facilities as possible. The same tactics were followed by American students - punitive in the Donbass. What we cannot take, it is necessary to destroy it to the ground.

    This is a long-standing tactic of the fascists (when they retreated) and amers (Japan, Dresden) when the enemy was already defeated by ours.
  23. Alexey Boukin
    Alexey Boukin 10 November 2015 11: 39 New
    0
    Quote: ZKVR
    And what prevented us from doing this?

    Forgive me, judging by the blue-yellow-red colors of your flag, the question begs- "And who do we?"
  24. amba balamut 77
    amba balamut 77 10 November 2015 11: 41 New
    +1
    Frogs are getting smaller. In WWII, only a hundred pilots smeared with the USSR Air Force, and today, by fifty of our dryers and turntables, a whole AUG is being smeared.
  25. Sagittarius YaNAO
    Sagittarius YaNAO 10 November 2015 11: 43 New
    0
    French Air Force attacks militants' oil facility in eastern Syria on Sunday

    "Well, then do not get to anyone" ..... belay
  26. Wolka
    Wolka 10 November 2015 11: 55 New
    0
    it’s just that the frogmen bombed the oil fields supposedly to deprive ISIS of financing from oil smuggling, and in fact partially destroyed the country's oil infrastructure in order to completely undermine the economy of Syria and the regime of B. Assad, who is at war with international terrorism, which , an urgent need, or something else, because something is inaudible that the Russian aerospace forces bombed industrial facilities in Syria, it is inaudible about bombing strikes at oil terminals in ports where smuggled oil is loaded, and there is nothing to detain ships with smuggled oil I hear, a coalition from the Yankees where you are fighters against international terrorism ...
  27. Krut
    Krut 10 November 2015 12: 51 New
    0
    Quote: Geisenberg
    Quote: Baikonur
    attacked an oil militant facility in eastern Syria near the border with Iraq
    A weak? Bomb oil facilities on the border with Turkey? BUT? Those. exactly what you need to stop oil smuggling! Oh no! it's your own!


    Do you think they bomb ISIS? They bombed what should soon come under the control of Syria.

    As you can see from the map from Syria a little bit left. So welcome. There is something to bomb.
  28. fest 1973
    fest 1973 10 November 2015 17: 36 New
    0
    "The consequences of the airstrike are not reported." Was there a boy? recourse
  29. gammipapa
    gammipapa 10 November 2015 19: 13 New
    0
    And who allowed? Why is ours silent, the most intelligent or something flocked to delicious.
    As Wang said there - but the winner will not be the one.
    As usual, Russia will do all the dirty work, and someone will be more skilful.