Military Review

The Great Chessboard: How Russia Will Win the World Hybrid War

86
The one who comes into conflict last is most likely to become a new world hegemon. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.


The Great Chessboard: How Russia Will Win the World Hybrid War


Let's call a spade a spade. There is the fourth world war unleashed by the United States in a hopeless attempt to keep the world hegemony escaping from them.

By its imperialistic nature, this war is no different from any other world war. All the same war for dominance, for spheres of influence, for control over the distribution of resources, for the preferred model of the world economy.

This war differs only in a set of tactical tools. In the First and Second World War, direct clashes between huge mass armies over hundreds of kilometers of solid fronts were preferred.

The hostilities of the Third World (Cold) were predominantly in secondary directions, in the countries of the “third world”, often with the help of a “proxy” (formally independent, but actively supported weapons, money and instructors of countries and groups). A direct collision between the USSR and the USA was impossible because of the presence of a large number of nuclear weapons on both sides, because then the HLG doctrine would work - guaranteed mutual destruction.

The main hostilities were conducted in the information space, often with the help of an inner fifth column, the so-called “dissidents”.

The dissidents were actively supported with money, spun, providing opportunities to publish and perform on television and radio, as well as defended them in every way, raising howls about “human rights” every time they were caught in outright sabotage.

At the same time, inside the United States, they confidently pursued a policy of McCarthyism, when any dissenters were declared “satanic commies”, actively subjected to harassment or physically destroyed.

The third world USSR lost, mainly due to the betrayal of the elites. As a result, all the countries of the former USSR and the Warsaw Pact were under external control for many years (some are still like the Baltic States, Ukraine and Poland), subjected to resource looting (sometimes natural resources, sometimes human, sometimes financial etc) and targeted de-industrialization.

The methods of the Fourth World War started by the USA are also limited by the presence of a large number of major players (USA, Russia, China, etc.) of large nuclear weapons. Therefore, it, like the third, is conducted indirectly, without direct clashes of the main participants.

Although the US fleet is already demonstrates the intention to enter the inland seas of China, and Beijing (and the PLA headquarters) consider this unacceptable and may respond. But even if it happens, then at the first stage it will be a conflict of low intensity.

And while the US-China relations are rapidly heating up, the war is already going on in three spaces: in the economic, in the information, and actually in the military.

Economic space:

a) sanctions against Russia that violate both international law and WTO rules;

b) attempts to block Russian gas supplies to the EU by organizing a coup d'état in Ukraine;

c) drawing the EU into an TTIP treaty;

d) dumping of oil prices, including illegal supplies from territories controlled by ISIL, etc.

Informational space:

a) attempts to make Russia an aggressor in the eyes of the international community;

b) attempts to destroy the consensus within Russia, to cause a fall in confidence in the government and, as a result, to organize a “Maidan” in Russia, followed by a change of power to the loyal to the United States and / or the split of Russia into a number of dependent entities;

c) “de-Sovietization” of the countries of the former USSR, the creation of Russophobic mythology about the “oppression” of these countries, as the basis of their state ideology (often the myth of oppression is the only basis for the statehood of a number of limitrofs);

d) constant pressure in the media and social networks “like living in Russia is bad”, eating the last hedgehogs, and having to eat caviar without bread (attempts to really compare with numbers and facts are resolutely rejected);

e) a campaign to form a perception of China as tyranny (spinning the Falun Dafa sect, supporting Tibetan separatist lamas, stories about the "hundreds of millions who were shot by Mao Zedong" etc);

f) the image of Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Syria, Belarus and a number of other countries as “authoritarian dictatorships”, attempts of “color revolutions” in these countries.

War space. The number of open military conflicts has been growing rapidly lately:

a) Donbass;

b) Ukraine as a whole;

c) Syria (IS and "moderate opposition");

d) IS in Iraq;

e) Saudi-Yemen conflict.

The Israeli-Palestinian tensions have also escalated, unrest in Afghanistan, sluggish conflicts in the CARs and several other African states. And practically everywhere, the US or its closest satellite allies are visibly or invisibly present.

Actually, the head of the Pentagon, without further ado, He accused Russia and China "in an attempt to change the existing world order." But the old order, when the United States robbed these (and other) countries with impunity, does not suit anyone either. Therefore, further confrontation is inevitable.

And only the liberals and the guard patriots (the last for many suddenly) yell "no need to enter into conflict with the United States," that is, "Katz offers to surrender." Just think, trade off the extinction of a few tens of millions of Russians to the possibility of a “creacle” for a few more years to choke with moldy cheese. However, according to the set of their public statements, it has long been clear that they do not care about these tens of millions of lives.

The position of "guard patriots" deserves special attention. They shouted for many years, “Russia must free itself from Western occupation,” and when such a confrontation actually arose, they sharply screamed “it disappeared.” Attention, the question is: how is liberation from Western influence possible without confrontation? And how consistent is their position in that they are ready to plunge Russia into a civil war for the sake of their idealized ideas (the essence is not important, monarchical and nationalist), but at the same time they ache because of one self-killed soldier? Moreover, they spread rumors about non-existent losses, resembling Madame Vasilyeva, who even once buried a football team.

In my opinion, the positions of the “guard patriots” are hypocritical and deceitful in each of the points, and their real interests are not in the reforms in Russia, but in the service of Western masters. Or to those who want to be a Western occupation administration in the Russian Federation, which is even more disgusting (and some of them have already served in the previous one, under Yeltsin).

As I said, there is a world war. And the alarmists in the times of all previous wars “led to the wall”. If Goebbels had the Internet, thousands of “daughters of GULAG prisoners” would sit there and write, for example, in December 1941 “Stalin is constantly retreating, the Germans are already near Moscow, you need to urgently change the government to patriots”. Fortunately, Dr. Goebbels did not have internet access, and our grandfathers then won.

No need to harbor illusions and live by the laws and demands of peacetime. There is a war, and during a war it is sometimes necessary to be patient and to strain yourself. Not a single country that the Americans "democratized" did not become a better life - neither Iraq, nor Afghanistan, nor Libya, nor Ukraine. On the contrary, they all lost the opportunity in the coming years to find a relatively peaceful life, and hope for development in the foreseeable future.

In fact, the actions of the Russian leadership are fairly simple and clear - Moscow is trying:

a) move the main fighting as far as possible from its borders;

b) minimize the intensity of battles with the participation of Russians (Slavs) in order to minimize their losses;

c) trying to pull off time, delaying confrontation with the United States, waiting for Washington to endure and start aggression against its main rival, China.

Today, the alignment is approximately as follows: there are two main conflict zones (Ukraine and the Middle East), with the potential for another conflict, but for strategic control over the South China Sea.

The conflict in Ukraine at the lower level looks like a civil war "between Russophiles and Russophobes", "Bandera-Vlasovists against the Soviet", and at a higher level - like a clash of American proxies who staged a coup and seized Kiev, with pro-Russian proxies holding Donbass.

Today it is actually frozen, and any attempt by the American puppets to unfreeze it is met with a negative perception from Europe, which is already lacking in problems.

The muted conflict of low intensity, over which hotheads are dissatisfied, is much better in terms of saving lives than Total War, which Ukrainian nationalists who have survived until now, dream of. The longer the conflict is frozen, the more obvious is the collapse of Kiev’s European illusions and the weaker the power of the impotent junta.

It is only in Kiev that some Ukrainian-centered illusions are built, thinking that the whole world revolves around the Ruins, and for the Americans they are just a bargaining map. Like Pinochet, Hussein, Mubarak or any other pocket dictator before them. At the moment when the costs of maintaining the Poroshenko-Yatsenyuk regime exceed their usefulness, they will be instantly “merged”. In strict accordance with the principles of mercantilism, formulated by Sir Francis Bacon.

The conflict in the Middle East is much more complicated, including in view of several hotbeds of confrontation and a large number of parties.

The first point is Syria, where Russian aviation helps government forces resist US proxies (someone still doubts that IS and the “moderate opposition” are US proxies, after all the help Washington has provided and continues to provide?). There are also Iranian proxies helping Assad. Now there the situation is slowly but surely breaking over to the side of a legitimate government.

The second point is Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The Saudi mercenary army, invading Yemen, fights very badly and, with more or less intense battles, rushes to flight. As a result, Yemeni Hussites not only successfully defended, but already captured one of the cities in Saudi Arabia itself and practically controlled one of the CA provinces. In addition, the Saudis suddenly started having problems with finances, and they are now actively recruiting debts.

The third potential conflict point is the Kurds against Turkey. Erdogan’s Islamist and nationalist policies have already led to a break in the truce between Kurdish militant groups (Peshmerga and others) and the Turkish government. And if the Kurds succeed in repelling the IG offensive (and everything is moving towards this), then in the future they can turn their weapons against Istambul, with the result that Turkey will get a civil war.

The fourth conflict point is Israel against Iran. Iran does not fight directly with Israel, but uses its proxies (HAMAZ and Hezbollah) to constantly “alarm” the Israeli army and other security forces.

In fact, the United States is losing, significantly weakening or turning against itself the majority of its “allies” in the region - Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Israel.

However, this tangle of belligerent contradictions in the Middle East may become secondary if the United States and China enter into direct armed confrontation for control over the South China Sea. So now we need to follow this direction as closely as possible, which can fire at any moment.

China is waiting for whether the United States and Russia will clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to clash. The one who is the last to come into conflict has the greatest chances of becoming a new world hegemon - such is (and not a sword with his head) the nature of the race for world hegemony. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.
Author:
Originator:
http://jpgazeta.ru/velikaya-shahmatnaya-doska-kak-rossiya-pobedit-v-mirovoy-gibridnoy-voyne/
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya
    venaya 11 November 2015 09: 59 New
    +9
    This is not giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.

    when the costs of maintaining the Poroshenko-Yatsenyuk regime exceed their usefulness, they will be instantly “merged”.
    Now we are pinching weed here on a tubercle, then we will go down and everyone ...
    1. just exp
      just exp 11 November 2015 10: 01 New
      +8
      they will merge the piglet with the egg and put the others up, which they will explain all the failures by saying that they poked all the grandfathers. then they will merge these and others, and everything will go as before.
      and so on ad infinitum. Europeans will hawt until their death.
      1. Temples
        Temples 11 November 2015 10: 09 New
        -9
        There is a fourth world war unleashed by the United States

        I overslept the third world or what? what
        I thought this was life, but it turned out that the third world was in full swing.
        Maybe the author for a day in Syria or the Donbas under bullets?
        Maybe then he will understand what war is and will not be scattered in terms.
        Get out of the computer strategist.
        What does he play there in his free time from writing?
        Obviously not in chess - you need to think there.
        How they want war.
        Turn on your head, the warriors are bad.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. sannych
          sannych 11 November 2015 10: 33 New
          16
          From the article: The USSR lost the third world war, mainly due to the betrayal of the elites. As a result, all countries of the former USSR and the Warsaw Pact were under external control for many years.
          As a result of the collapse of the USSR and the ensuing crisis in all areas of activity, demography, etc. population loss (remember the Russian cross, population decline by a million per year) amounted to millions. For these reasons, many, not only the author, call the collapse of the USSR and the years that followed, the third world war. The war is not only in Syria, and in the Donbass, dear. And not only "under the bullets".
          1. Temples
            Temples 11 November 2015 10: 44 New
            0
            You sir at this time lived as you desired.
            Well, or cried due to the fact that someone is interfering with your life.
            But in a war, you would be in a trench or where your homeland needed to be protected, but not where you would like to.
            Not at the computer, thoughts would be shared with others.
            So do not confuse war and peace.
            The world can be different, but the world is not a war
            1. sannych
              sannych 11 November 2015 11: 06 New
              +7
              at that time they lived as they themselves wished. In the 90s, I (and all others) lived as they wished? Have you and I lived in the same country? Who lived as he wanted at that time? I will say who are the bandits and top-level officials.
              ... because someone is bothering you.
              At that time, those who took away the country in which I was born and lived interfered with my life.
              So do not confuse war and peace. The time at which a country loses its population in sizes exceeding any local conflict cannot be called peaceful.
              1. _Vladislav_
                _Vladislav_ 11 November 2015 11: 14 New
                +1
                I agree with the author that a wall-to-wall armed conflict cannot necessarily be considered a world war (wars change are transformed, like science and technology), the article is awesome. I just want to comment on some points.
                And only the liberals and the guard patriots (the last for many suddenly) yell "no need to enter into conflict with the United States," that is, "Katz offers to surrender." Just think, trade off the extinction of a few tens of millions of Russians to the possibility of a “creacle” for a few more years to choke with moldy cheese. However, according to the set of their public statements, it has long been clear that they do not care about these tens of millions of lives.

                Quite right, you cannot be free if your freedom is not backed up by actions and opportunities. For instance:
                08.08.2008/XNUMX/XNUMX - action
                Crimea - action
                VKS in Syria - opportunities
                KR "Caliber" - opportunities
                If Goebbels had the Internet, then thousands of “daughters of the Gulag prisoners” would sit there and write, for example, in December 1941 “Stalin is continuously retreating, the Germans are already near Moscow, and the government urgently needs to be changed to patriots.” Fortunately, Dr. Goebbels did not have Internet access, and our grandfathers then won.

                I think Goebbels exists now. It’s just that its capabilities over the Internet are proportional to Russia's defense capabilities in the electronic and information sphere.
                The muted conflict of low intensity, over which hotheads are dissatisfied, is much better in terms of saving lives than Total War, which Ukrainian nationalists who have survived until now, dream of. The longer the conflict is frozen, the more obvious is the collapse of Kiev’s European illusions and the weaker the power of the impotent junta.

                Moreover, with Total War, the National Bender regime is cut first, and quickly. This is precisely what the nationalists of Ukraine do not realize - they believe that America will fit in with them, and we will die and give up.
                The first point is Syria, where Russian aviation helps government forces confront American proxies (someone else doubts that the IS and the “moderate opposition” are American proxies, after all the help that Washington has provided and continues to provide?). There are also Iranian proxies helping Assad. Now the situation there is slowly but surely breaking to the side of the legitimate government.

                If we consider the situation in the context of various PROXYs, it is fair to say that DLNR are Russian proxies.
                China is waiting for whether the United States and Russia will clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to clash. The one who is the last to come into conflict has the greatest chances of becoming a new world hegemon - such is (and not a sword with his head) the nature of the race for world hegemony. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.

                But this is a very interesting question.
                The hypothetical clash between the USA and China makes China dependent on Russia in a geopolitical sense. And the United States is receiving enormous damage, since it won’t be possible to win off the coast of China. In this case, China also suffers huge damage with fundamental consequences.
                Such a situation is more profitable for Russia, since in this case Japan also rakes, with bases on Okinawa. But any of these alignments is clearly not beneficial to the United States, since in any case they do not reach the goal. They rake and swim away. Yes, nobody will touch them at home. But this is a loss of leadership, etc. etc.
                1. Mahmut
                  Mahmut 11 November 2015 11: 56 New
                  +2
                  “Desovietization” of the countries of the former USSR, the creation of a Russophobic mythology about the “oppression” of these countries, as the basis of their state ideology (often the myth of oppression is the only basis for statehood of a number of limitrophs);

                  And the de-Russification and collapse of the Russian Empire did not take place under other slogans. Who for the first time called Russia a "prison of peoples", tearing the great country apart into nationalist rags. Hybrid wars began long before the appearance of nuclear weapons. The first Orange Revolution took place in January 1905.
                  1. Uncle Joe
                    Uncle Joe 11 November 2015 15: 48 New
                    0
                    Quote: Mahmut
                    Who first called Russia a "prison of peoples", tearing the great country apart into nationalist rags
                    He called Astolf de Custine, broke the unitarity, approved the gap by the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks gathered back on the principles of federalism.
                    1. Weyland
                      Weyland 12 November 2015 00: 58 New
                      +2
                      Quote: Uncle Joe
                      He called Astolf de Custine, tore the unitarity, approved the gap, the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks gathered back on the principles of federalism


                      Astolphe de Custine called "a prison, the keys of which are in the possession of the king" - but not "a prison peoples"
                      tore apart Lenin, the vile, with his "right of nations to self-determination"!
                      Stalin gathered back, but Unfortunately, on the principles of federalism, but not unitarity — that is why it has crumbled again! China probably does not crumble!
                      1. Uncle Joe
                        Uncle Joe 12 November 2015 16: 47 New
                        0
                        Quote: Weyland
                        Astolphe de Custine called "a prison, the keys of which are in the possession of the king" - but not "a prison peoples"
                        Kyustin wrote: “No matter how vast this empire is, it is nothing but a prison, the key to which is kept by the emperor,” and he called Nicholas 1, referring to his status as a “European gendarme,” “jailer of one third of the globe.”
                        Kustin was not talking about “interethnic relations”, not about oppression by the metropolis of non-Russian peoples, but about the equally unenviable position of all the peoples under the rule of the Russian emperor, about the absence in Russia of civil society (and simply independent public opinion) that could resist the will of the monarch, who in its immense power is almost equal to the Asian ruler.
                        A. Herzen called this book "the most entertaining and clever book written by a foreigner about Russia." Considering that this book was very popular (according to Herzen, “Kyustin’s work was in all hands”), the image of Russia as a “prison of peoples”, found by the author, thanks to frequent repetition and citation, entered the Russian language as an aphorism. (Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions)

                        tore apart Lenin, the vile, with his "right of nations to self-determination"!
                        Stalin gathered back
                        On March 16, 1917, the Provisional Government of Russia recognized Poland’s right to independence.

                        On March 7 (20), 1917, the Provisional Government issued an Act approving the Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Finland, returning to Finland all the rights of the times of autonomy and repealing all restrictions of the period of Russification.

                        On October 8, 1917, Siberian regional workers declared Siberia autonomy and created the first Siberian government led by Potanin, which was subsequently dispersed by the Bolsheviks.

                        On July 2 (15), 1917, a telegram arrived from Kiev to Kiev with the text of the government declaration, which stated that the General Secretariat was recognized as the highest administrative body of Ukraine, and that the government would favorably respond to the development by the Ukrainian Council of the draft national-political statute of Ukraine.

                        In July 1917, the Second Congress of Belarusian National Organizations was held, at which it was decided to seek the autonomy of Belarus as part of a democratic republican Russia.

                        On March 9 (22), 1917, the Estonian Tallinn Union was organized in Revel, demanding from the Provisional Government the accession of the northern counties of Livonia to the Estland province and the introduction of autonomy.

                        From July 20 to July 27, 1917, the First All-Bashkir Congress was held in the Caravanserai in Orenburg.
                        At the congress, the Bashkir Government was elected, which was engaged in the preparation of negotiations and the implementation of the autonomy of Bashkurdistan in the federal structure of Russia.

                        At the First All-Kazakh Congress, the organization of the Alash party took place, one of the points of the program of which was the creation of territorial-national autonomy with the dominant Kazakh population of a single origin, a unified culture, history and a single language.

                        On July 22, 1917, the National Cultural Autonomy of Muslims of the Turkic-Tatars of Inner Russia and Siberia was proclaimed in Tatarstan.

                        Etc.

                        This whole mess ended with the formation of the USSR in 1922, when Lenin was the Prime Minister of the RSFSR, and Stalin the Minister of Workers and Peasants Inspection of the RSFSR and a member of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the RSFSR.

                        So learn history and no longer disgrace.

                        unfortunately, on the principles of federalism, not unitarity — that is why it was crumbling anew
                        Has the unitary Russian empire not crumbled?
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                2. severniy
                  severniy 11 November 2015 12: 03 New
                  -2
                  The article makes the gray cells in the head move faster ...
                  It is distracting that the author is trying to patent the use of the word "proxy" in a different way from the usual sense, plus its (the word) use would entail a lower grade for the essay.
                  1. severniy
                    severniy 11 November 2015 12: 13 New
                    0
                    The picture for the article is cool, only there are too many kings on the board ... There is only one king on earth .. And no more than yesterday he even took a picture for the magazine ... Icon ... Mlyn ... laughing
                    1. severniy
                      severniy 11 November 2015 12: 20 New
                      +1
                      What is called find ...
                      1. severniy
                        severniy 11 November 2015 12: 23 New
                        +1
                        10 differences ... Even that flag ....
                    2. bif
                      bif 11 November 2015 20: 47 New
                      -1
                      Quote: severniy
                      The picture for the article is cool, only there are too many kings on the board ... There is only one king on earth.
                3. Uncle Joe
                  Uncle Joe 11 November 2015 15: 44 New
                  -1
                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  I agree with the author that an armed conflict may not necessarily be considered a world war
                  It is specifically for such "consonants" that mankind has come up with dictionaries.
              2. Temples
                Temples 11 November 2015 11: 25 New
                -4
                At that time, they prevented me from living ...

                cry, sobbing.
                Everyone is to blame !!!
                They prevented him from living ...laughing
                But how much pathos - the country was taken !!!
                The country is not that, they interfere with life)))
                And what cabbage soup were there before! And what kind of mirrors - they showed young and healthy)))
                All the bandits and the power took !!! wassat
                This war certainly was. The whole world is up against you !!!
                1. Karlovar
                  Karlovar 11 November 2015 15: 09 New
                  0
                  The methods of waging war throughout the history of mankind have evolved, changed ... Previously, the outcome of wars was often decided by agreement between the strongest warriors, if wall to wall, then in an open field (in a predetermined place), the civilian population did not suffer in any way, in the morning the population was notified that taxes should be paid to another king ... At the same time, they did not strain on national, religious and other grounds ... Then the wars took on a total character, the civilian population suffered in full (robbery, unbearable taxes, indemnities, reparations), for religious preferences were pursued, on a national basis ... Since the establishment of nuclear parity, the war acquired the character of a "cold" one, the economic and information fronts + hot local conflicts came to the fore .... Today is the same (the same form of war), only technical content other ...
              3. antoXa
                antoXa 11 November 2015 12: 57 New
                +4
                sannych
                you should not try to explain something to a person who simply does not understand you and does not understand what this article is about ... there are people who are "in the trenches in life" ...
                moreover, for 4 months on the site he scribbled almost 6 hundred comments ...
                1. The Chat
                  The Chat 11 November 2015 14: 29 New
                  +1
                  Maybe this is another "daughter of an officer from the Crimea" or a sympathetic bearer of the "white ribbon"?
            2. RUSOIVAN
              RUSOIVAN 11 November 2015 12: 37 New
              +1
              "The world is war!" J. Orwell. Unfortunately he is right.
          2. SibSlavRus
            SibSlavRus 11 November 2015 11: 17 New
            +4
            Let me add. The third world war in historical science (as well as in geopolitics and the history of international relations) is called time in the period (generally) from the beginning of the formation of NATO to the collapse of the ATS, the USSR (and, in fact, many are convinced that the Third World War did not end), expressed in the confrontation of two world systems and a series of continuous local wars, both directly and indirectly and indirectly in which the leading countries of these systems, the USA and the USSR, participated.
            Russia, as the assignee of the USSR, continued the confrontation already over spheres of influence. After Ukraine, in fact, we went on the offensive.
            Russia has never been the subject of geopolitics, but only its subject, and the highest level of superpower.
            And the IVMB, in my opinion, began precisely with the collapse of the Former Yugoslavia, when NATO, under the leadership of the United States, reformatted the goals and objectives of the organization and expanded its powers to the whole world, as if it were a peacekeeping organization.
            The Balkans were their first goal on the path of weakening Russia and its influence. Where the Americans were, military bases and the purchased national pseudo-authorities almost always remained.
        3. PQ-18
          PQ-18 11 November 2015 10: 40 New
          +1
          logically - "she was called ... COLD", now the 4th HYBRID wink
          and after the 5th CYBERNETIC we (people) will be kept in their zoos, along with the monkeys! crying
          1. SibSlavRus
            SibSlavRus 11 November 2015 11: 37 New
            0
            All wars in human history are classified for generations(now there are 6 of them).
            And it is precisely on this that it is worth basing and afterwards moving on to the types and types of wars.
            1. SibSlavRus
              SibSlavRus 11 November 2015 14: 48 New
              0
              The classification of generations of war was proposed by the doctor of military sciences V. Slipchenko, based on a system analysis in historical science.
        4. WKS
          WKS 11 November 2015 10: 42 New
          +2
          Quote: Temples
          I overslept the third world or what?

          This is such a journalistic one. Substitution of concepts is called. N-naya world he will have pillows.
          1. Temples
            Temples 11 November 2015 10: 53 New
            -1
            Such a nice receiver.
            But many peck and get used to this substitution.
            So the war no longer scares, but is accepted as something ordinary.
            A huge number of everyday relationships between people are called wars.
            They got to the point that many people consider their life a war.
        5. Baloo
          Baloo 11 November 2015 14: 21 New
          0
          She is already undergoing yet another world hybrid terrorist war against Russia. To see this, you need to wash and look wider at the whole picture of the world. Put flags, arrows and it will become clear what is really happening. hi
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 12 November 2015 01: 36 New
            0
            Baloo

            Are you sitting in a trench?

            What are you listening to any nonsense?

            Some Fursenkov hero wrote a bunch of mouini, and here we have spread passions.
        6. Karlovar
          Karlovar 11 November 2015 14: 54 New
          0
          Dismemberment of the USSR, destruction of the army and navy (disarming the losing side), destruction of industry, privatization in favor of Western henchmen, production sharing law (indemnity), occupation administration (with “advisers” from the west), brain drain to the west (intellectual indemnity), a bunch of interethnic conflicts with hundreds of thousands of victims (divide and conquer), robbery of the people (through hyperinflation), poverty, six months without pensions, salaries (woe to the vanquished) ... All this is not the consequences of a loss ... war ?????????????????????
        7. Fidget
          Fidget 11 November 2015 16: 19 New
          0
          Dear, take a look at the 4th paragraph of the article ...
          meaning hidden war.
          besides, the term "war" does not only mean rain of lead and exploding shells.
          for example, the wars of sports club fans - you don’t see them, but the fights there are so fierce that they block the sporting event itself, which caused the battle.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 12 November 2015 01: 37 New
            0
            Fidget.

            War, it is lead rain.

            And the Cold War is a figurative expression.
        8. SanSuh
          SanSuh 11 November 2015 16: 35 New
          -1
          Something you don't catch up a little, so I'm sorry "-"
        9. gladcu2
          gladcu2 12 November 2015 01: 31 New
          -1
          Temples

          I support your irony.

          The author is noble. Rogers. :)

          Scored by an activist. Rzhu Nimagu.
    2. EGOrkka
      EGOrkka 11 November 2015 11: 10 New
      -1

      when the costs of maintaining the Poroshenko-Yatsenyuk regime exceed their usefulness, they will be instantly “merged”


      .... here's a look ... as if from behind a hill ... Accounting for appetites .... there is absolutely no ruin .... but in vain: 1.if we recall: the desire of the egg to become a member of G-8, 2. persistent a requirement for europia on a visa-free regime .... for prostitutes and organized crime groups ... 3 .... knocking out funds for euro-holdings holding power ...... from europia. clearly says only one thing ... the ruin will be dodged, mimic and intrigue ..... but beg for money .... will ALWAYS !!!! hi
    3. SibSlavRus
      SibSlavRus 11 November 2015 11: 43 New
      +2
      "Whoever is the last to enter the conflict has the most chances to become the new world hegemon. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics."

      Just like the United States entered the I and II MB.
      No wonder geopolitics were banned in the USSR and considered imperialistic science.

      While Russia, after the regime of THREE large-scale wars in 30 years, made an unprecedented feat in history for the restoration and development of the country, we were already preparing new wars.
      For as P.A. Stolypin: "Give Russia 20 years of peace and you will not recognize it." And this, in fact, is the death of the parasitic Anglo-Saxon civilization.
      1. Karlovar
        Karlovar 11 November 2015 15: 14 New
        0
        The war will last forever until one of the parties is destroyed or enslaved ....
    4. marlin1203
      marlin1203 12 November 2015 01: 31 New
      0
      Some kind of superficial cast of the next Western "expert" from the modern geopolitical situation. About nothing at all. In my opinion, everyone at VO is aware of this statement. No.
  2. V.ic
    V.ic 11 November 2015 09: 59 New
    +7
    China is waiting for the United States and Russia to clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to come together first.

    Yes, blowing us this cup!
    1. cniza
      cniza 11 November 2015 10: 03 New
      +7
      Quote: V.ic
      China is waiting for the United States and Russia to clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to come together first.

      Yes, blowing us this cup!



      I'd like to believe it, but the situation is still not clear and the game is dragging on, yes, however, it never ended.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. hydrox
      hydrox 11 November 2015 10: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: V.ic
      Yes, blowing us this cup!

      Blowjob will not be! lol
      Rogers proceeds from outdated assumptions: now we need to consider not the question of "Who will win", but first to figure out "Who will start first" with the understanding that Russia, of course, will join, but with China, not the United States. Therefore, given our economic weakness, it is important for us not to "win", but "NOT to lose," therefore Putin will be careful so that China and the United States are the first to grapple with, and then the collapse of the global financial system will arrive in time. The Chinese, on the other hand, did not get involved in Syria for us, they wait exactly the same as we do. So why should we, headlong, rush under the air defense system in someone else's war in the South China Sea?
      1. V.ic
        V.ic 11 November 2015 13: 29 New
        0
        Quote: hydrox
        Blowjob will not be!

        I missed the letter "y", it's my fault. However, the resulting word is by no means Russian. On the great and mighty, what you thought about, it seems, is written c / z a dividing soft sign.
        I mean: Matt. 26, 39 "Yes this Cup pass from me".
        Here is the Block, by the way:
        "I'm not sorry for the days, neither joyful nor sultry,
        Neither a ripe summer nor a young spring.
        They passed - light and restless,
        And again they will come - they are given by the earth.

        I'm sorry that great day is coming soon blow job,
        A barely born child will die.
        Oh, I'm sorry, friend, - the coming fervor will cool down,
        In the past darkness and in the cold leaving!

        No, even at the end of a wandering wandering
        I will find the way and I will not breathe about the day!
        Do not overshadow the cherished date
        To the one who sighs for me here. "
        A.A. Block. "I am not sorry for the days of neither joyful nor sultry ..."
    4. dr. sem
      dr. sem 11 November 2015 10: 43 New
      +1
      "Yes, this cup blows us!" No. Not a blowjob ...
    5. veksha50
      veksha50 11 November 2015 10: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: V.ic
      China is waiting for the United States and Russia to clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to come together first.
      Yes, blowing us this cup!



      The author missed one more purely theoretical and practical option (Holy and holy God forbid !!!): the USA is waiting, it will not wait for a possible clash between China and Russia ...

      I hope that these STATE expectations are not fulfilled in the near or distant future ...

      PS And how would the staff wanted this !!! In one fell swoop - two main rivals beat !!!
      1. The Chat
        The Chat 11 November 2015 14: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: veksha50
        PS And how would the staff wanted this !!! In one fell swoop - two main rivals beat !!!


        Quote: veksha50
        The author missed one more purely theoretical and practical option (Holy and holy God forbid !!!): the USA is waiting, it will not wait for a possible clash between China and Russia ...

        I hope that these STATE expectations are not fulfilled in the near or distant future ...


        God grant that this time this option does not work. But this is precisely the strategy by which the States economically won the first two world wars. And they hope to win this time too ....
      2. Karlovar
        Karlovar 11 November 2015 15: 19 New
        0
        This is their blue dream! And they work hard in this direction! Moreover, not without success, many hawala stories about the "Chinese threat" .... By the way, before the Russo-Japanese war, they also spread stories about the "Chinese threat", but not about the Japanese ...
  3. prabiz
    prabiz 11 November 2015 09: 59 New
    -2
    Yes, the party will not be easy! recourse
    1. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 11 November 2015 10: 21 New
      -1
      ours always played chess well and not only .....
      1. Denis DV
        Denis DV 11 November 2015 10: 33 New
        0
        I note, in the case of Russia, the losers in previous wars started first, as this time hi
  4. just exp
    just exp 11 November 2015 10: 00 New
    +7
    This chess game is already thousands of years old, and for the sake of it, history is rewritten, including the ancient one.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ 11 November 2015 10: 25 New
      0
      this chess game for thousands of years

      I do not quite agree with you. There has not yet been such a game as a result of the drawing of which entire continents can become lifeless for a very long time. And there were no victories at that cost. But formally, yes, the party is ancient.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. polite people
    polite people 11 November 2015 10: 00 New
    +6
    Russia has never claimed to be a world hegemon. But she knows how to beautifully and clearly put everyone in their place. It is her right as the MOST POWERFUL STATE on planet Earth. Something like this. soldier
    1. dr. sem
      dr. sem 11 November 2015 10: 10 New
      +3
      Not so much "strength" as "truth" has guarded Russia for hundreds of years.
    2. Aksakal_07
      Aksakal_07 11 November 2015 10: 57 New
      +2
      "right as the MOST STRONG STATE on the planet." How different is this from the American "the rights of the strong"?
      For the role of world hegemon claimed (and it was fair and justified!) Soviet Russia being in the format of the USSR. And there is nothing wrong with claims to the role of world hegemon. The main thing is the goal that the applicant proclaims, and the methods that he uses to achieve the stated goal.
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 11 November 2015 11: 02 New
      +1
      Quote: polite people
      Russia has never claimed to be a world hegemon. But she knows how to beautifully and clearly put everyone in their place. It is her right as the MOST POWERFUL STATE on planet Earth. Something like this



      For the first part of the sentence, I would put a plus for you ... But for the second cap-making, it’s minus ...

      The result is nothing, zero, zero ...

      And it started as well ...
  6. cniza
    cniza 11 November 2015 10: 00 New
    +3
    An interesting article and conclusions, it is hard to imagine that this is happening here and now. Apparently each generation has its own war and its own battle for survival.
  7. chikenous59
    chikenous59 11 November 2015 10: 07 New
    +1
    It has long been time for everyone to understand in our country that if we want to live well, we must be prepared, at least mentally, for war. The United States will not give up leadership just like that, and we would not give up, if we were hegemons.
    We are doing the right thing, that we are pulling time. Every year we are getting closer to the United States in terms of capabilities, in some areas we are even possibly ahead.
    Time will tell who will rule the world and, I hope, develop it and protect it from destruction.
    China and the United States will not be able to do this, because both parasites of the United States are mentally ill, and there are too many Chinese to save the planet and its resources!
    It is beneficial for us to exterminate psychopaths and reduce the population of China by an order of magnitude.
    1. Kolka82
      Kolka82 11 November 2015 10: 31 New
      +1
      we would not give it back if we were hegemons.

      This is not our path - to be hegemons (one word makes us sick). Initially, the Slavs are a hardworking, peaceful people, constantly proving to everyone that it is better "Guys, let's live together!" not invented and not worth inventing.
      1. Nick
        Nick 11 November 2015 11: 33 New
        0
        Quote: Kolka82
        we would not give it back if we were hegemons.

        This is not our path - to be hegemons (one word makes us sick). Initially, the Slavs are a hardworking, peaceful people, constantly proving to everyone that it is better "Guys, let's live together!" not invented and not worth inventing.

        Now, if Russia becomes a world leader, it will be this principle of relations that it will translate into international life
  8. bugrovata
    bugrovata 11 November 2015 10: 09 New
    +1
    China is waiting for whether the United States and Russia will clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to clash. The one who is the last to come into conflict has the greatest chances of becoming a new world hegemon - such is (and not a sword with his head) the nature of the race for world hegemony. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.

    Clever! I support the thought! good
  9. Yunik
    Yunik 11 November 2015 10: 10 New
    0
    The analysis is objective, but Russia does not fight for a multipolar world. Russia fights for its existence, in principle, to speak of some kind of influence in the world, while it is not necessary, unfortunately.
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 11 November 2015 11: 07 New
      +3
      Quote: Unique
      The analysis is objective, but Russia does not fight for a multipolar world.Russia is fighting for its existence, in principle, unfortunately, there is no need to talk about any influence in the world.



      Um ... I’ll try not only to challenge, but to look from a slightly different side ...

      Russia fights for a multipolar world, for it is the existence of multipolarity without wars that will give it the opportunity not only to survive, but also to develop further ...

      Well, something like this...

      PS And respect and weight on a global scale will be brought to her by precisely this struggle for multipolarity, which in case of victory will give many states a sigh of oppression from the world hegemon ...
  10. Tor5
    Tor5 11 November 2015 10: 10 New
    +3
    Very reasonable, voluminous and useful article! Thanks to the author.
  11. chikenous59
    chikenous59 11 November 2015 10: 11 New
    0
    Quote: polite people
    Russia has never claimed to be a world hegemon. But she knows how to beautifully and clearly put everyone in their place. It is her right as the MOST POWERFUL STATE on planet Earth. Something like this. soldier

    The strongest state on the planet cannot depend on others in almost all sectors!
    So we are not the strongest yet. Over time, get stronger.
    PS: Strength is not only measured by muscles and the army
  12. Alagez
    Alagez 11 November 2015 10: 12 New
    +1
    That’s all taken and explained. +
  13. Valevampo
    Valevampo 11 November 2015 10: 14 New
    +3
    My grandfather, veteran, honored pensioner told me, unconsciously, that China would wait for someone - the USA or the USSR to bend earlier, it was the end of the 70s, nothing has changed in China’s position, only the USSR was gone, an article about what I've heard
  14. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 11 November 2015 10: 15 New
    0
    This is not giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.
    Oh, oh. And we hoped so. Knocked down a figure won. But it turns out all the moves are recorded and the figures are counted. There were times and heavier.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Victor62ru
    Victor62ru 11 November 2015 10: 18 New
    +1
    Amerikosy will never directly fight with a country that has equal military potential, much less nuclear weapons. But with weak countries - it’s easy. They eat too tasty and sleep sweetly.
  17. LukaSaraev
    LukaSaraev 11 November 2015 10: 22 New
    0
    I agree. Let our enemies get the blowjob. or "moderate" friends.
    Quote: V.ic
    Yes, blowing us this cup!

    In short. may they all be at sas ut!
  18. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 11 November 2015 10: 24 New
    +1
    Quote: polite people
    Russia has never claimed to be a world hegemon. But she knows how to beautifully and clearly put everyone in their place. It is her right as the MOST POWERFUL STATE on planet Earth. Something like this. soldier


    Classics - West vs East. And we all rushed about 300 years ago. Until they realized that Russia is the third civilization stabilizing the world. In the 90s, at some forum, either Mitterrand or Chirac (I do not remember, unfortunately) was asked on this topic, the answer is - you are the third, how do you not understand? Hegemony is not for us.
  19. Hello
    Hello 11 November 2015 10: 27 New
    -1
    The one who comes into conflict last is most likely to become a new world hegemon. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.

    Judging by the logic of the author, China will become the new hegemon, how Russia will win is not clear request
  20. VeteranS
    VeteranS 11 November 2015 10: 34 New
    0
    “Man proposes, but the Lord disposes!” And according to the numerous predictions of the holy elders (I leave Vanga aside, although her predictions are often in unison of the elders), the United States will soon disappear from the map of the earth as an aggressive state with a demoniac elite that has openly come out in conflict with God (One state encouragement of sodomites and perverts is worth a lot!) And Russia, as the main guardian and champion of traditional values ​​(read God's), has to become the leading power in the world and defeat all its enemies, visible and invisible!
  21. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 11 November 2015 10: 34 New
    0
    Useful article, I read it with pleasure. Today is generally rich in analytics.
    In my opinion, the author has not yet taken into account the fourth force - a united Europe. Now the EU is going through hard times, but we remember that both the first and second world wars began in it, and they were preceded by the very situation that is currently heating up in it (Europe). Of course, the EU is not drawn to the world hegemons, but what is called "I will not give it to you either." A lot of dirty tricks can come from this side.
    1. dzvero
      dzvero 11 November 2015 12: 08 New
      +1
      It is hardly possible to consider the EU as the fourth center. In my opinion, at the moment, the EU can be considered as an analogue of the Balkans at the beginning of the 20th century - an object and not a subject of geopolitics. The only option to become a power center is possible if Germany regains full sovereignty and heads the EU. Which in itself is unlikely. So Europe can serve as a tool to create the problems of Russia and China, eventually, but any self-initiative will turn into suicide.
  22. cap
    cap 11 November 2015 10: 38 New
    -1
    EVERYTHING BEGINS FROM GLASS BEADS, NOW DURING DOLLARS AND EURO,
    PROVIDED BY THE INTELLECT OF FINANCERS OF THE FRS AND ECB, WHICH IS QUOTED BEYOND OIL AND GOLD.
    It is clear that this is MMM (ONLY IN THE PHOTO NOT A MAVRODI) AND FATE WILL BE SAME.
  23. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf 11 November 2015 10: 42 New
    0
    Articles of defectors in the hope of earning a kusman of bread. Something is struggling with dill, more and more we are walking through. At his age, Ukraine had to defend its homeland from the Nazis. , they will give Vater. And there you have to fight, you will suddenly perish. In one word, the same journalist as all his dill brethren, and more than half of ours.
  24. divangeneral
    divangeneral 11 November 2015 10: 45 New
    -1
    As a matter of fact, according to the reaction to thuggings from Ukrainian emigrants Rogers and Ishchenko, Russians can be divided into 1) adequate and 2) jingoistic patriotic Svidomites who rose from their knees, outplayed Obama, defended Donbass, created New Russia, now ISIS will add and quickly everything will spoil and replace the toga alive ....
    for some reason, for some reason, Ukraine, under the Americans and their fascist puppets, who suddenly became partners and friends for Putin, passed a law on the entry of NATO troops into Ukraine, which can be considered the final point in the discharge of Ukraine, Novorossia is buried along with Bednov and Mozgov, LDNR merged and turned into ODILOSOS and the process of withdrawing troops and armaments from this territory is already being completed.
    Putin wrote off 30 000 000 000 dollars of debt to Cuba and gave it to the Americans, there will be no base there anymore
    Kamran handed over, now the Japanese will put their fleet there.
    we will now deal with import substitution Serdyukov, Vasilyev from time imprisoned
    The stabilization fund will already be officially consumed (stolen) next year.
    prices in stores all increased one and a half times, the cost of living is growing.
    Where are our nanotechnologies? Where are the liquid metal robots from Skolkovo?

    and now minus, cheers-patriots. under your approval, we will drown all together.
  25. kill the fascist
    kill the fascist 11 November 2015 10: 45 New
    +3
    if we take on faith that the main players (Russia, China) are pursuing a strategy of waiting - whoever is the last to activate is the winner, then, I think, the Chinese are here in a knowingly winning situation. firstly, the national mentality - Asians are patient, they know how to hide emotions. the Chinese are not by nature aggressors. the famous "wisdom" attributed to the Chinese speaks volumes - sit by the river and wait for the corpse of your enemy to float by. It seems to me that the United States primarily presses on the interests of the Russian Federation precisely because in a real war with the use of nuclear weapons we are the main and real rivals, and in a virtual / economic war we can hardly oppose mattress mats. the world and mattress economy is strongly tied to the Chinese one, and here it is possible to struggle with large losses for all parties. but as soon as a situation arose in Syria with a possible military confrontation between the USA and the Russian Federation, mattresses did not escalate. in the present, it seems to me, the strength of the strategy of the Russian Federation is in Suvorov's sayings: To fight not by numbers, but by skill, and Speed ​​and onslaught is the soul of a real war.
  26. urik62
    urik62 11 November 2015 10: 47 New
    0
    Quote: Temples
    There is a fourth world war unleashed by the United States

    I overslept the third world or what? what
    I thought this was life, but it turned out that the third world was in full swing.
    Maybe the author for a day in Syria or the Donbas under bullets?
    Maybe then he will understand what war is and will not be scattered in terms.
    Get out of the computer strategist.
    What does he play there in his free time from writing?
    Obviously not in chess - you need to think there.
    How they want war.
    Turn on your head, the warriors are bad.

    Oh, sorry only one plus can be put. ten pluses from me!
  27. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 11 November 2015 10: 48 New
    +8
    For starters, we should defeat our fifth column, and then think about hegemony!
  28. divangeneral
    divangeneral 11 November 2015 10: 52 New
    -1
    Quote: Hello
    The one who comes into conflict last is most likely to become a new world hegemon. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics.

    Judging by the logic of the author, China will become the new hegemon, how Russia will win is not clear request


    do not you understand? just Russia will become part of China.
    out Siberia has already given one "land collector" for half a century in rent for 250 rubles. per ha
    and for us Russians, the Chinese will allocate (possibly) then a reservation and a transitional period of utilization, and then separate copies will then be shown in zoos and circuses as an example to their children, how can you manage your country and its resources
  29. veksha50
    veksha50 11 November 2015 10: 53 New
    -1
    "China is waiting for the United States and Russia to clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to come together first. The last to enter the conflict has the best chance of becoming the new world hegemon"...

    It is difficult to disagree with the conclusion of the author, A. Rogers, ...

    However, it seems to me that the conclusion is somewhat incomplete ... It is not finished in the sense that he did not say that the political and financial and economic establishment of the United States had not yet fully realized to which angle he had driven himself and his country .. .

    It would seem - which is easier: forget about ambitions, trade together with each other, develop further ...

    Nooo, you need a palm, you need to feel like a hegemon ...

    I will express my opinion: in any case, the USA will not be the winner ...
    Engage in the East) with China) - will suffer irreparable damage and lose not only Asia and the Far East, but also Western and Eastern Europe ...
    Engage with Russia-the same thing, just the opposite ...

    So I would like the US political leadership to understand this as soon as possible ...
  30. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 11 November 2015 10: 53 New
    +3
    The author is joking. China is firmly linked to Matrasia by economic ties; China has the largest amount of striped government securities. If the mattress seriously decides to "hack to death" with China, the entire economy of the world, based on green candy wrappers, will have to be rewritten anew. The winners will be self-sufficient countries that can provide themselves - food, energy, transport, weapons, finally. It looks like it is Russia.
    And mattress, coupled with Canada. The rest on the internal resource will not last long.
  31. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 11 November 2015 10: 55 New
    +2
    Having a strong army is the first thing. And then do not make unnecessary gestures, but do everything in a timely manner. This is a huge experience ..
  32. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 11 November 2015 10: 58 New
    +2
    An interesting article, but about Russia as a world hegemon is superfluous. We did not and do not aspire to world leaders as a hegemon. I would like to become leaders in economics, in sporting achievements, in education and science, in the standard of living of our citizens, but just not be a global hegemon, since this is unpromising and ungrateful. We are a good-natured, conscientious people, ready to support anyone in their difficult moment, and this is where our hegemony ends
  33. Oblomov
    Oblomov 11 November 2015 11: 06 New
    -1
    Very interesting
  34. askort154
    askort154 11 November 2015 11: 08 New
    +2
    What the author ranked as World War 4 is "controlled chaos".
    The United States will never go to a "direct" war, either with Russia or with China. For them, this is a shot not in the leg, but in the temple.
    Therefore, they will continue to follow the well-trodden path. Create chaos within and around the "desired" country
    with the involvement of their "allies". The camp of "allies" will soon begin to decline, more and more realizing that the United States is bluffing.
    Two more shepherds, Russia and China, are approaching the herd run by one shepherd.
  35. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 11 November 2015 11: 20 New
    +2
    "Whoever comes into conflict last has the most chance of becoming
    the new world hegemon - this is (and not saber naked) the nature of the race
    for world hegemony. This is not a giveaway, kids, but geopolitics. "////

    Ultimately, the one who always has the most powerful economy and finance is the hegemon.
    China has become "number 2" in the economy, but lags behind in finance. And understands this: promotes
    yuan as a reserve currency, like the euro and the pound.
    And in the future it has every chance of becoming "number 1" by both criteria.
  36. Velizariy
    Velizariy 11 November 2015 11: 22 New
    0
    A global collision of the strongest geopolitical formations is possible. In light of the "unification" of all economies, the domination of transnational corporations, the purposeful and well-organized desecration of the majority of the population, which is expressed in the substitution of values ​​and deprivation of the ability to think and comprehend, make decisions, etc., the purpose of this collision is traced - the creation of a world state from remnants of peoples with an erased national identity and national identity under the open control of the now shadow rulers of the world. And for the success of this global venture with a big war, states with approximately equal combat capabilities are needed, because a draw and humanity exhausted by wars and uncertainty is needed, only in this way is voluntary unification under one world ruler of all peoples possible, but the most important destructive factor is depriving a person of the ability to comprehend and to produce - the creation of a bestial image - the image of the consumer, the ideal of consumption.
    Based on this, one can make an assumption why the foreign policy influence of Russia and our armed forces and the paradoxical systemic and progressive internal decomposition are increasing.
  37. Stepan stepanovich
    Stepan stepanovich 11 November 2015 11: 24 New
    +2
    And alarmists during all previous wars were "led to the wall"

    Alarmists (even real ones, not invented), the tenth thing!
    Interestingly, but saboteurs, saboteurs, saboteurs, thieves in power and other enemies of the people, were awarded medals? Here it is a field not plowed, there is no end to work! Go with the songs!
    The people will support!
  38. Mestny
    Mestny 11 November 2015 11: 25 New
    -1
    Quote: veksha50
    It would seem - which is easier: forget about ambitions, trade together with each other, develop further ...

    Well, what about? Trade for profit. And if you are a hegemon, then you can determine the rules of trade which are beneficial to you. Or just take what you want.
  39. Gani
    Gani 11 November 2015 11: 27 New
    0
    but they have already captured one of the cities in Saudi Arabia itself and practically control one of the CA provinces.
    it's true? or did he come up with a reason to shout cheers?
    1. Gani
      Gani 11 November 2015 11: 51 New
      +1
      Found, the day before yesterday they took a small village in the mountains on the territory of Saudi Arabia on the border with Yemen, which seems to be strategically important, but and practically control one of the CA provinces. somehow too optimistic
  40. NordUral
    NordUral 11 November 2015 12: 05 New
    +2
    Our super task is to build a socially oriented strong state. And this means a change in the social system, nationalization and a ruble independent of anyone. If this does not happen, then everything will result in the liberal chatter of the occupation territory, which we still are, despite the boastful bravado of the liberals in power. And we have one path - the repetition of Stalinist industrialization. There is experience, it is time to rethink it and to do something like that on a new round.
  41. Neophyte
    Neophyte 11 November 2015 12: 16 New
    0
    A Chinese dragon according to Confucius and the precepts of Mao, while watching from the "mountain" for the battle of the tiger and the bear, with the subsequent victory of the dragon over the weakened victor under the mountain? A typical eastern strategy, but the events are unpredictable, given the accelerating events in the Pacific region. The Middle East for Russia- the problem is long-term, with a tendency for a similar problem to flow into the CAR.
  42. triglav
    triglav 11 November 2015 12: 16 New
    0
    I totally agree.
  43. maikl50jrij
    maikl50jrij 11 November 2015 12: 29 New
    +2
    I put a plus on the article, but I don't quite agree! I would not like to consider the collapse of the union a defeat ... It is, rather, a cleansing. Betrayal of the elites, yes! There is not even a conversation! But ... Imagine the opposite. We have won and the union has been preserved. In those years we wanted to make the Baltics more or less European - we did. "Little Europe" is a success! Ukraine. We washed it, combed it, lifted it up, brought it up to European standards ... Why not Europe ... And what about Poland? And Moldova? And Bulgaria ... Everything for everyone !!! This is about the CMEA and our treaty. Just imagine how many "allies" we had, smiling at us, shaking our hand ... and in the other, behind our back, a stone! After years of "working together", cleaning is necessary! And it happened! Let in this way, through the betrayal of "their". But now we know exactly who "hu ..." is. And so, in general, I agree! Yes, that's right, the eastern region is now problematic. So this is against the background of the fact that because of the disputed islands, we have not signed a peace treaty with Japan. And this is another "activist" in this region!
  44. silver_roman
    silver_roman 11 November 2015 12: 54 New
    +3
    China is waiting for the United States and Russia to clash first. Russia is waiting for the United States and China to come together first.

    Let's be honest: the states started with us. We will not discuss the reasons, this is a fact.
    And it is very unlikely that they will open a second front against China without ending with us.
    Or they will try to freeze the conflict with us, which is unlikely.
    To be honest, the Chinese have recently been pretty cool. It was Russia that took the main plague, but the integration of the United States and China is enormous.
    Ideally, of course, it would be great if the Saxons were behind us. We need time to:
    0) I'll start with this, because it is much more important than 1.
    It is NECESSARY to get off the track of liberalism and capitalism. We have reached the point that we are copying the financial system from the Finns, who at one time copied it from the USSR. The same is true for medicine, which was the best in the world with us.
    STRUCTURAL REFORMS NEEDED. otherwise it will be learned that in foreign policy we are moving in the right direction, and in domestic, we will speak frankly - COLONY!
    1) Diversify the economy.
    2) Pull industry under domestic science, resources - remove dependence on export of finished products.
    3) Trade in high-tech products themselves, which cost several times more than raw materials.
    4) Tighten the EAEU. Everyone has already forgotten about him. Nevertheless, old Clinton was right when she said that they would prevent us from building an alliance.

    this is what came to mind!
  45. Army soldier2
    Army soldier2 11 November 2015 13: 24 New
    0
    Strange article. World War III, World War IV ... World War I and II are classified so because most states have entered the armed struggle. And now? What is happening now has its own terminology. And if you want to invent a new one, describe it.
    Some passages of the author are generally perplexing.
    "The number of open military conflicts has been growing rapidly recently" Has there been more of them, at least in comparison with the "Arab spring"?
    "In the meantime, US-China relations are rapidly heating up" What is it clear from? The USA and China need each other.
    Well, this:
    "Moscow is trying:
    a) move the main fighting as far as possible from its borders;
    b) minimize the intensity of battles with the participation of Russians (Slavs) in order to minimize their losses;
    c) is trying to stall for time, delaying the confrontation with the United States, waiting until Washington can not stand it and starts aggression against its main rival - China. "- generally beyond.
  46. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 11 November 2015 13: 27 New
    +2
    The article put a minus. I will make a reservation right away that I am not a "patriot guard", I am rather "trying to figure it out." to try to understand. what awaits me and my family in my last years. Questions arose on the text. I quote: As I said, there is a world war. And alarmists during all previous wars were "led to the wall." If Goebbels had the Internet, then thousands of “daughters of the Gulag prisoners” would sit there and write, for example, in December 1941 “Stalin is continuously retreating, the Germans are already near Moscow, the government needs to be changed to patriots urgently”... Fortunately, Dr. Goebbels did not have the Internet, and our grandfathers won then. But now there is the Internet, and our opponents are using it to the fullest, at the same time, our government is playing with the Internet in "Leopold Cat". If we are already having World War 4, then why are these references to "International Law", to human rights. Whether Stalin would have won the war. if I observed human rights, when there is a war there are the rights of a "good man", but traitors have no rights. I quote: Moscow ...: ... c) is trying to play for time, delaying the confrontation with the United States, waiting until Washington can stand it and starts aggression against its main rival, China. Why won't Washington stand it? What would he like to write to him? China and the United States are spouses in the economy, and the quarrels between them are nothing more than quarrels between them. But the most important thing: you CANNOT WIN THE WAR WHILE BEING FINANCIALLY DEPENDENT ON THE AGGRESSOR. You write that, here we are trying to slip out of the dollar loop, well, well. only somehow clumsily, for 10 years they have been talking about the need to get off the oil tgla, but apparently they comfortably settled on it. THESE TALES ABOUT STRUCTURAL REFORMS, and 90% of the exchange's cash is the speculative capital of our opponents. These mantras are about opening our economy, that is, opening up to our opponents. I do not expect a reasoned answer, because our actions are logically incomprehensible.
  47. alex_sdc
    alex_sdc 11 November 2015 13: 31 New
    +1
    Quote: Temples
    I overslept the third world or what?

    Definition
    War is a conflict between political entities - states, tribes, political groups and so on - taking place in the form of armed confrontation, military (combat) actions between their armed forces. The purpose of the war is the survival or destruction of the enemy.

    Is what is happening on the international scene today does not meet this definition ???? In the territory of Donbas, there are even direct clashes with the Armed Forces of Russia and the United States (though both officially there is no). And not only in Donbass, but if we recall the "peacetime" of the twentieth century, then about the same thing happened in Afghanistan, Vietnam, Africa, Georgia, etc. etc. So the war is going on, but the war is modern.
  48. Uncle Joe
    Uncle Joe 11 November 2015 15: 55 New
    0
    how Russia will win the world hybrid war
    Hybrid Warfare - a term that appeared in the USA at the end of the XNUMXth century to understand the military strategy, combining as a whole ordinary war, small war and cyber war.

    Some people like to operate with terms invented by hated Americans, and investing in them "meaning" to the extent of their own depravity.
  49. uhu189
    uhu189 11 November 2015 16: 39 New
    0
    Or maybe the author will share his vision - and what goals does Russia set for itself now, since he knows so well in geopolitics? Something I have not heard anywhere so that our goal is to become a world hegemon. Like I have not heard at all any distinct and specific goals of where we are moving. Nobody remembers about the Russian World. The energy superpower is also obsolete. How can you win if you do not have criteria for determining victory?
    World hegemony is already the past ... Not states govern this world, but transnational corporations, states fulfill the role of screens for their activities. There are no effective measures to counter them and their policies. And I venture to suggest that China and the United States will never clash as the author expects this, and with his approach, the Russian Federation can wait until the second coming ... To confront the West, you can only have a powerful independent economy behind. The reality at the moment is that for us to build this powerful economy, in addition to declarations in the media, nothing is being done, and time is being stupidly missed. Incendiary patriotic articles - this is of course a necessary and good thing - but in moderation. Otherwise, the effect of them will be the opposite.