Divisions of EW TSVO received complexes "Leer-3"

49
Two newest electronic warfare systems "Leer-3", equipped with drones "Orlan-10", entered the Central District as part of the state order, reports RIA News message cvo.



"The complex" Leer-3 "is intended to suppress GSM-communication using interference. A special transmitter, installed on its Orlan-10 light UAV, simulates the base station of a cellular network and thereby blocks the full-time 2 operation of thousands of subscriber terminals within a radius of more than six kilometers, ”the release said.

It is reported that “Orlan-10” is able to be airborne for up to 10 hours, carrying a weight of about 4 kilograms; its flight radius is 120 kilometers, the maximum speed of the vehicle reaches 150 km / h, cruising speed is 80 km / h. "

According to the press service, "" Leer-3 "is made on the basis of the KAMAZ-5350 chassis, which allows it to move on highways and rough terrain." The use of UAVs will significantly increase the capabilities of the EW unit when performing tasks.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    9 November 2015 18: 19
    6km Chot is not enough !!! here 60km is the most !!! recourse
    1. +22
      9 November 2015 18: 22
      The drone itself is small, I think there is a whole company of electronic warfare on the front line with them and several of them will work with them, blocking the work of the brigade of "our partners" it will turn out completely bad for me.
      1. 0
        9 November 2015 22: 37
        Quote: Sith Lord
        The drone itself is small, I think there is a whole company of electronic warfare on the front line with them and several of them will work with them, blocking the work of the brigade of "our partners" it will turn out completely bad for me.


        To hell with them, "our partners" ... "Your partners" how is it? Will they be able to feel something like this on themselves, so that later how to share their impressions with “ours” (if they survive)?
    2. +18
      9 November 2015 18: 37
      So many new electronic warfare products, an answer to the superiority in communications, which is probably also in the past)
      1. -6
        9 November 2015 18: 44
        Quote: Civil
        So many new electronic warfare products, an answer to the superiority in communications, which is probably also in the past)

        There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why 99% new items based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what
        1. -3
          9 November 2015 18: 48
          Quote: keel 31

          There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why are the new 99% based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what

          "Someone gave someone a paw" or "someone's relatives work there." Well, saving money from the number of manufactured products and to calm down there is such a word "unification".)
          1. +4
            9 November 2015 19: 00
            Quote: kimyth1
            6km Chot is not enough !!! here 60km is the most !!! recourse

            not that’s a radius .., but the total girth is already like 12 .., plus mobility .. the network was demolished, flew on and off, came back, here again ..., the complex should find its niche ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +21
              9 November 2015 19: 10
              Quote: Kil 31
              Quote: Civil
              So many new electronic warfare products, an answer to the superiority in communications, which is probably also in the past)

              There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why 99% new items based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what

              I think that uu nooorm.
              firstly, do not twist the KAMAZ’s most hyped brand, plus it has more achievements than the entire Russian automobile industry, it is not in vain that it takes first places in the sand! there’s not a podium to buy a bribe .., the track either passed, or not ...
              the second lawns on a 4 * 4 drive are a miserable parody of an SUV, the Urals also have swallows, albeit an army, but where they need money they think ..
              well, and thirdly, it is more suitable in terms of carrying capacity, the gas can navel tear, and you need to load three pieces in the Urals, so that you do not drive empty ... laughing
              IMHO everything is of course, but I think the choice is justified ...
              1. 0
                10 November 2015 06: 30
                ... at one time they decided to deploy the Kama association there for the development of the region - the human resource was large, but there was no industry .. Shaimiev then became a mess - he wanted to become the Supreme Khan, and between us girls, speaking - this is the territory - of the Bulgar kingdom , and not Tataria (Tatar = Cossack warrior) - this is not a nation - this is the "name" of the territory of V.I. Lenin in 1920.
                1. 0
                  10 November 2015 08: 51
                  The Volga Volga Tatars are the descendants of the Bulgars actually ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. -3
            9 November 2015 19: 12
            Quote: Phantom Revolution
            Quote: keel 31

            There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why are the new 99% based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what

            "Someone gave someone a paw" or "someone's relatives work there." Well, saving money from the number of manufactured products and to calm down there is such a word "unification".)

            Unification is a good thing I do not argue. Do other car factories die? Who decided to carry out unification precisely on KAMAZ. Is there a question? hi
            1. +3
              9 November 2015 19: 29
              Quote: Kil 31
              Quote: Phantom Revolution
              Quote: keel 31

              There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why are the new 99% based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what

              "Someone gave someone a paw" or "someone's relatives work there." Well, saving money from the number of manufactured products and to calm down there is such a word "unification".)

              Unification is a good thing I do not argue. Do other car factories die? Who decided to carry out unification precisely on KAMAZ. Is there a question? hi

              Well, you're a conspiracy theorist ... lol
            2. 0
              9 November 2015 22: 04
              Quote: keel 31
              Who decided to carry out unification precisely on KAMAZ. Is there a question?

              Kamazization of troops began in those days when GABTU was led by a certain S. Mayev and son.
        2. -6
          9 November 2015 18: 48
          Quote: keel 31

          There are many new products. A thought occurred to me. Why are the new 99% based on KAMAZ. There is almost no Urals and there are almost no lawns. Not good thoughts go into your head about the possibility of negotiating with a customer in Tatarstan. what

          "Someone gave someone a paw" or "someone's relatives work there." Well, saving money from the number of manufactured products and to calm down there is such a word "unification".)
        3. +36
          9 November 2015 19: 04
          Actually, I myself live in Tatarstan and I don’t understand, aren't we Russia or something? By the way, most of the weapons and helicopters are manufactured in Kazan and I don’t accept reading such comments.
          1. +7
            9 November 2015 19: 21
            Quote: slaw14
            Actually, I myself live in Tatarstan and I don’t understand, aren't we Russia or something? By the way, most of the weapons and helicopters are manufactured in Kazan and I don’t accept reading such comments.

            Don't be offended. I have nothing against "Brezhnev". I have a passenger car from there. But I feel sorry for the "Ural" is a good car, the carrying capacity is almost the same, some say the cross-country ability is even better. hi
            1. +3
              9 November 2015 19: 35
              I agree with my father, the driver went with him in the Urals and Kamaz. Ural itself turned out to be more passable. And I remember the army - nobody wanted to stay on Kamaz, it shakes so ...
            2. +1
              9 November 2015 22: 46
              Quote: Kil 31
              Quote: slaw14
              Actually, I myself live in Tatarstan and I don’t understand, aren't we Russia or something? By the way, most of the weapons and helicopters are manufactured in Kazan and I don’t accept reading such comments.

              Don't be offended. I have nothing against "Brezhnev". I have a passenger car from there. But I feel sorry for the "Ural" is a good car, the carrying capacity is almost the same, some say the cross-country ability is even better. hi

              Ural last century, not a single block except the front end to block with the middle bridge. Ural Next is just starting. And what is everything based on? There is no choice, but all about the paw.
              And the Ural tadpole is also a miracle, (control and reliability) half of the imported one. Tested in Yamal.
          2. 0
            9 November 2015 20: 43
            Do not be offended by patients with idiocy!
            1. +1
              9 November 2015 21: 25
              Quote: Samara-58
              Do not be offended by patients with idiocy!

              You call idiocy that you did not put the complex on the "Zhiguli"? If you, Vladimir, are worried about a neighbor from Tatarstan, why don't you worry about a neighbor from Ulyanovsk, they can also make a serious car. There would be an order. By the way, not far from you there is MIASS, they have everything on stream. Just have time to order. hi
          3. 0
            9 November 2015 23: 08
            Quote: slaw14
            I actually live in Tatarstan myself

            And the rest die?
            1. +3
              10 November 2015 00: 32
              Quote: zennon
              And the rest die?

              what kind of crazy logic? Will we arrange a zoo in the army again? so that then the whole country tore the navel? Are you from URAL?
    3. 0
      9 November 2015 18: 51
      Quote: kimyth1
      6km Chot is not enough !!! here 60km is the most !!! recourse

      Rather, a complex for narrowly targeted operations, for this you need to cut down a small area, and "Orlan-10" is just an antenna
    4. +10
      9 November 2015 19: 04
      "NATO said: The giant electronic bubble in Syria does not allow us to fly. Radars have been blinded, electronic guidance systems have been disrupted, and satellite imagery has been interfered with in a 600 km bubble," said one NATO general in the Daily OSNet.

      News came from the combat zone in northern Syria about the deployment of a new Russian electronic jamming system that could reportedly blind radars, disrupt electronic guidance systems and also interfere with satellite imagery.

      This last post follows an earlier report on the Russian cruiser with the S-300 missile defense system deployed off the coast of Latakia. Both of these systems make up what the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of NATO, General Philip Breedlove, describes as the “Russian bubble” of A2 / AD (anti-access / restricted area) in Syria, writes Daily OSNet.

      As a result, NATO was effectively blinded inside a 600 km bubble, centered on a Russian base in Latakia. Further, the author tries to understand what kind of secret weapon the Russians deployed in Syria.

      It suggests that the technology under consideration seems to be similar to Richag KRET, but apparently with functions of a larger scale. A tactical version of this system was presented to journalists in Russia in April 2015.

      The Richag system is mounted on the basis of the Mi-8MT helicopter. They say that now there is no way to suppress it. Its electronic countermeasures are designed to blind radars, sonars and other detection systems, in order to protect aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, ground and sea forces against air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles and other defensive systems within a radius of several hundred kilometers.

      It can be installed on blocks of any kind of armed forces, including helicopters and aircraft, as well as ground and naval forces. Much attention is paid to the crocodile tears of NATO General Philip Bridlaw, who said that in addition to the Baltic states and the Black Sea, the Russians closed our access to the Mediterranean.

      Do not forget the inglorious mission of "Donald Cook" in the Black Sea.

      Judging by their actions, they are feverishly looking for common ground, but they are afraid that a sharp transition from confrontation to cooperation will be taken for surrender. For Obama, this is an aspen stake in a political career. For some considerable time we have not heard “raids” in the UN by V. Churkin from one unbalanced person.

      The tone and content of the speech of J. Kerry regarding Syria and Ukraine has changed. No one demands Assad’s immediate departure, but they are already reprimanding the Poroshenko regime for violating the Minsk decisions. Russia gives a calm and adequate response to the insults. Now the American media themselves recalled to Obama everything that he said about the "torn to shreds economy" and about Russia as a "regional power", but in an unpleasant way for him.

      Reader comments are about the same as Censore. We do not believe, all lies, we will destroy the Kremlin propaganda with a simple rocket, although there are common thoughts about how America has sunk to the point where it is being driven from everywhere. "
      1. 0
        9 November 2015 19: 22
        It’s interesting if NATO doesn’t come up with how the optical and IR reconnaissance satellites were “closed” with the "bubble". Have they already started to drive the A-60? wink
        1. 0
          9 November 2015 23: 12
          Quote: Lance
          Have they already started to drive the A-60?

          Generally there is "Krasuha" ...
    5. 0
      9 November 2015 19: 24
      The most interesting drones "Interpolitech-2015" http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/70167/
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      9 November 2015 20: 46
      Quote: kimyth1
      6km Chot is not enough !!! here 60km is the most !!! recourse

      Yeah, since when have the base stations of operators started working for 60 kilometers? In addition, it is necessary to drown out not one band, but several, we have it: 800, 900, 1800, 2100 and 2600 MHz. And most importantly, with a payload of 4 kilos.
    8. +1
      10 November 2015 05: 09
      We teach physics, high-frequency radio waves are quickly quenched, and GSM is 800-1900 MHz.
    9. 0
      10 November 2015 09: 33
      Quote: kimyth1
      6km Chot is not enough !!! here 60km is the most !!! recourse

      Dear, 6 km is the range of GSM. More is not necessary. Otherwise, it turns out that the signal will be too powerful and the mobile terminals will not accept it.
      After all, here the idea is to deceive them.
  2. +5
    9 November 2015 18: 23
    "Complex" Leer-3 "is designed to suppress GSM-communication using interference

    The main task: to turn a high-toned, expensive rocket into a useless blank. Good luck in such an important matter.
    1. +3
      9 November 2015 18: 31
      I don’t understand, but what side is the rocket?
    2. +6
      9 November 2015 18: 33
      Quote: venaya
      The main task: to turn a high-toned, expensive rocket into a useless blank. Good luck in such an important matter.

      Here you need a lock not GPS but GPS laughing Rather, they are ideally suited for jamming landmines when escorting columns and storming settlements.
      1. 0
        9 November 2015 18: 45
        Quote: lelikas
        Here you need a lock not GPS but GPS

        It's a shame, but I was hoping it was possible to play with missiles. Let's hope for further, more advanced developments, I think there is still time.
    3. 0
      9 November 2015 18: 50
      And to turn several thousand "partners" INTO FULL BOUNDS ... For without a mobile phone, one continuous burial ground ... Have already forgotten about the couriers and so on.
      Quote: venaya
      "Complex" Leer-3 "is designed to suppress GSM-communication using interference

      The main task: to turn a high-toned, expensive rocket into a useless blank. Good luck in such an important matter.
  3. +3
    9 November 2015 18: 24
    Even a photo of torn limbs on Instagram is not perfect, sadness!
    1. +1
      9 November 2015 18: 49
      Quote: Strezhevchanin
      Even a photo of torn limbs on Instagram is not perfect, sadness!

      They will be the old-fashioned way - by mail.
  4. bad
    +2
    9 November 2015 18: 33
    how much the technique is improving! .. first of all, it is necessary to test it on the bearded in Syria, otherwise they are lovers of all their media shit to merge into YouTube .. at the same time they break off the special forces of merikosovksy, and they are used to fighting in comfort .. screaming .. angry
  5. +5
    9 November 2015 18: 37
    Dear "Leer-3", jamming mobile communications (from official sources), you don't need to invent something that is not there
  6. +4
    9 November 2015 18: 38
    Well, until the end of the capabilities of this system, no one will tell us, and rightly, it pleases that something new appears.
  7. +4
    9 November 2015 18: 45
    Such a good complex. The most important thing is to have the right amount !!!!
  8. +2
    9 November 2015 18: 48
    Another hit over Russia in the spirit of the latter, but already in sports. Athletes may not be allowed to play 16
    http://www.championat.com/other/news-2296097-glava-komisii-wada-zajavki-rossijsk
    ikh-athletov-na-oi-2016-ne-dolzhny-byt-prinjaty.html
    1. +3
      9 November 2015 18: 53
      They will look for any reason that would be worthless, otherwise they can’t do anything.
  9. +2
    9 November 2015 21: 13
    Now this technique is especially needed in the South-East and near the borders with the Ruin
    1. +2
      9 November 2015 21: 21
      Quote: Anchonsha
      Now this technique is especially needed in the South-East and near the borders with the Ruin



      Something tells her that she’s already there, or an analogue. wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    9 November 2015 21: 58
    I think they were modest in range. Direct visibility 50 km. And here on top. So up to 60-100 km. This is real. It all depends on the power of the transmitter.
  11. +2
    9 November 2015 22: 31
    Quote: Kil 31
    Quote: slaw14
    Actually, I myself live in Tatarstan and I don’t understand, aren't we Russia or something? By the way, most of the weapons and helicopters are manufactured in Kazan and I don’t accept reading such comments.

    Don't be offended. I have nothing against "Brezhnev". I have a passenger car from there. But I feel sorry for the "Ural" is a good car, the carrying capacity is almost the same, some say the cross-country ability is even better. hi

    From many years of experience, I can confidently say that they are loaded, KamAZ and Ural, both with ten cubic meters of forest each, where KamAZ hangs, the Urals go freely. And kraz in general a cow!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      9 November 2015 23: 18
      Precisely, he worked at logging at one time, the Urals have no equal, what for Kamaz, how a hippopotamus will sit, where the Urals will crawl out on its belly and bridges.
      I remember that I was impressed when I watched the Urals drag a dozen cubes along a lodge laid along an unfrozen swamp in the Lena Region. With a noise and a crack, he drove a wave of logs in front of him, subsiding under the wheels, rising again under the belly to the frame and jumping out behind the dissolution with uplifting logs (two workers walked behind, correcting everything in place, for the next call).
      Having passed the swamp, and emerging on a more or less firm road, the Urals stood up, a lumpy carrier came out of it, and said: "But fuy, American tanks would have passed here! good
      1. 0
        10 November 2015 01: 26
        Quote: mitrich

        Having passed the swamp, and emerging on a more or less firm road, the Urals stood up, a lumpy carrier came out of it, and said: "But fuy, American tanks would have passed here! good

        If you drove with your head, then it will come out on Kamaz, you just need a knack. You need to be careful not to be more careful with Kamaz, choose the speed, turn on the clutches in time, nothing complicated. In Yamal, those who started in the Urals (private traders) moved to Kamaz long ago, and if the springs and shock absorbers of the cabin are strengthened, then it does not shake.
    3. +1
      9 November 2015 23: 41
      Quote: vair
      From many years of experience, I can confidently say that they are loaded, KamAZ and Ural, both with ten cubic meters of forest each, where KamAZ hangs, the Urals go freely. And kraz in general a cow!

      I had to work in several organizations that operate off-road equipment. What you write about timber trucks, I agree with you. Everything depends on the engine and transmission, and the Ural is better with bundles of whips, but only on a mustache. Since 2010, I have been working in geology for several years , new Urals began to arrive with drilling rigs, fuel trucks, flying bombs. And here we howled: the lightened and elongated frame began to burst in different places, the YaMZ-236NE-2 and YaMZ-236ND-2 engines did not want to work normally. that remade is a separate hundred tya. Although I like the Urals, but I like KAMAZ 43114 and 43118 more. Especially KAMAZ-43118.
      1. 0
        9 November 2015 23: 55
        Duc, you need to immediately weld on the frames in the right places, diamond-shaped pads and install ties. This applies to both the Urals and Kamaz off-road, such as a bed. Otherwise, the frame will quickly come kirdyk. And so - a reprieve. And the Urals, only diesel, "lighters" do not roll, weak and devour nemeryannom.
  12. 0
    10 November 2015 05: 23
    a valid means of front-line intelligence and electronic warfare, however, the working radius is somewhat small ...
  13. 0
    10 November 2015 06: 25
    Quote: mitrich
    Duc, you need to immediately weld on the frames in the right places, diamond-shaped pads and install ties. This applies to both the Urals and Kamaz off-road, such as a bed. Otherwise, the frame will quickly come kirdyk. And so - a reprieve. And the Urals, only diesel, "lighters" do not roll, weak and devour nemeryannom.

    You don’t need to weld anything there, this plant should still be taken into account when developing.
    And as for KAMAZ / Urals or other, there is a tender system, operating conditions, customer requirements ... if he has only KAMAZ in his fleet, why did he need Urals? to run to look for a spare part? In addition, pay your attention to our north and Siberia, they have everywhere moved to Kamaz, a friend works on the Kamaz trawl 25 meters, he does not complain about rigs. It’s a shame we ourselves are from the Urals, it’s a shame for our own people, but the reality is that.