The transfer of the BMP-3 batch to Kuwait has been completed on the basis of a previously signed contract.

16
The Tass news agency, citing a source, reports that the delivery process of Russian BMP-3 to Kuwaiti customers has been completed. This became known during the ongoing international aerospace show. Dubai Airshow-2015 in the United Arab Emirates.

According to an informed source TASS, BMP-3 shipments to Kuwait were completed in September. We are talking about the party in 35 (according to other data - 40) infantry fighting vehicles.

The transfer of the BMP-3 batch to Kuwait has been completed on the basis of a previously signed contract.


It is added that now questions of the subsequent service and possible modernization of the BMP-3 delivered to the country are being discussed with representatives of Kuwait.

At the aerospace show in Dubai it became known about the great interest of a number of states in the Su-35. Mr. Rostec Sergey Chemezov told the press that not only Indonesia was interested in the latest Su-35 Russian aircraft, as was reported recently, but also the military from such countries as the UAE and Brazil. According to Chemezov, it’s still too early to talk about signing contracts with these countries.
  • http://encyclopedia.mil.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    9 November 2015 12: 23
    all the same, the Arabs know a lot about weapons ... Yes
    1. +21
      9 November 2015 12: 26
      but they don’t know how to fight on it correctly
      1. +7
        9 November 2015 12: 53
        In fairness, they don’t know how to fight properly, at least without prompts and cruel instruction. As an example, the war between Israel and Egypt has never seen a blunter defeat.
      2. +1
        9 November 2015 13: 06
        historically, it was like that - Arabs besides waving their sabers can no longer do anything, even the siege weapons were used so-so in the Middle Ages, but yes, they are masters with a large kodla with a saber on camels.
    2. +4
      9 November 2015 12: 49
      They don't know anything. You take a look at their armored fleet ... Money is simply "immeasurable", that's all. How are they good at weapons to know that they are constantly at war, like Israel?
  2. +5
    9 November 2015 12: 28
    Arabs are the most stupid warriors and do not know how to use modern weapons, the whole history of the Arab-Israeli conflicts is an example! Whatever weapons they give, they always manage to get it by the cabbage soup! And the fact that they love all the most advanced and not only weapons is a fact. Therefore, the potential of the supplied equipment in cases with Arabs should be divided into two.
    1. +1
      9 November 2015 12: 35
      ... even more they love money and, as previous wars show, they merge all secrets to their opponent for money ...
  3. 0
    9 November 2015 12: 29
    They can count money, it is several times cheaper than any other supplier ... Plus a service for a reasonable price ...
  4. +4
    9 November 2015 12: 33
    I understand perfectly well that export deliveries of new types of weapons stimulate domestic deliveries to the Russian army. But it’s somehow restless that Kuwait and the UAE are hard to call friends ...
    1. 0
      9 November 2015 12: 38
      Quote: Decathlon
      But it’s somehow restless that Kuwait and the UAE are hard to call friends ...

      Four dozen infantry fighting vehicles from those parts will not reach us laughing
      1. -3
        9 November 2015 13: 26
        Quote: Corporal
        Four dozen infantry fighting vehicles from those parts will not reach us
        More precisely, it is our army that will not receive these four dozen new machines for itself, like the Ka-52, Su-35, S-400, and much of what these "effective sellers" of our newest weapons first of all push past their army ... This is despite the fact that now it is not large-scale production, as in Soviet times, but essentially piece production. It would not be desirable to sell some types of weapons at all. The CIA should give our merchants the order, for such a clever sabotage of our rearmament, in the face of the threat of a new war.
        1. +1
          9 November 2015 17: 50
          А cost reduction end product in mass production? Not only does the cost drop, all technological moments are worked out and honed. So the cost and quality of our equipment will be cheaper for us, due to the export sales portfolio. The military-industrial complex must earn and create all conditions for the arrival of young specialists. The touch of the USSR in technology and elderly specialists working on golnoy enthusiasm has practically dried up. Let them work, keep the team, develop technology. We are so advocating that export has finally gone, and not just a gas station. Voenka should be a profitable and massive segment, where there will be profit, there will be new machines without cutting pensions and subsidies from the budget!
          1. 0
            9 November 2015 20: 35
            Quote: Anatole
            We are so advocating that export has finally gone, and not just a gas station. Voenka should be a profitable and massive segment, where there will be profit, there will be new machines without cutting pensions and subsidies from the budget!
            Bravo, who's against it? However, if the same USA, with which we are so fond of measuring the percentage of sales, make primary purchases for their army, giving it priority, then we have priority to work on export supplies. It turns out that, according to the leftover principle, everything is fine, if they were selling the latest technology, so even for gold, so no, the despicable dollar continues to work not directly so indirectly for the US economy. Finally, the States do not sell everything, such combat aircraft as, for example, the F-22 or F-117 are supplied only for the US Army, and these are not the only weapons closed for export, there are also countries to which the States will not sell weapons, so as it is already a matter of politics and national security of their country. Do our traders understand this from defense, or are they absolutely on the drum, if only the "green" was paid? Before a new sample appears, they are already looking for a foreign buyer with us. You saturate your army first, then sell the surplus. Has touched the USSR, you say? Now there is not very bourgeois enthusiasm and for money it is developing, indeed, the old people of the Soviet temper will leave, and cooperation with India or crafty China will not help much, sell out what the old people created. China already had to show the gun for the clones of the Su-27 and S-300, and the S-400 and the Su-35 are already not enough for them, apparently, they are creating competition. Profit, money, here and now, but for the future is anything calculated? "Voenka" is primarily for the security of its country, and how "profitable" a nuclear submarine can be, the fifth thing, first of all, it must be technologically advanced and effective for the defense of its country. The "buy-sell" broke into defense, the legacy of Soviet science and technology, how raw materials are sold.
    2. +1
      9 November 2015 12: 39
      Upstairs they will choose the right solution.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      9 November 2015 12: 57
      Yes, it’s hard to call friends those who smile and the hand with a knife hides behind their backs.
    5. -1
      9 November 2015 12: 59
      I agree. they are not friends, they are not friends to us !!!! First, saturate the Russian army with new equipment - this is task number 1
  5. 0
    9 November 2015 13: 10
    Quote: Wolverine
    Yes, it’s hard to call friends those who smile and the hand with a knife hides behind their backs.

    No more words. 100% enemies full of dorm dough and the instigators of war in the Middle East.
  6. +1
    9 November 2015 13: 27
    And what do they have infantry? But what about camels?
  7. +1
    9 November 2015 15: 17
    Brazil is the speaker! Why do they need a Su-35?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"