Military Review

Defense Ministry of France will send aircraft carrier to the Middle East region

41
Paris decided to send the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle to the Middle East region, which will take part in the operation against the IS, reports MIC with reference to the statement of the Elysian Palace.




“It was decided to deploy an aviation-naval group in the region, formed on the basis of the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier. The purpose of these actions is to ensure participation in operations directed against the "Islamic state" and the groups that joined it "
stated in the administration of the French president.
Photos used:
novostipmr.com
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez
    Irokez 6 November 2015 11: 56 New
    +30
    And for what type it seems that they were in the area of ​​ISIS battles. How to really fight so nobody, and how to share the victory, then all at once.
    I have already seen it somewhere.
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 6 November 2015 11: 57 New
      +1
      And you couldn’t come up with anything else?
      1. just exp
        just exp 6 November 2015 11: 58 New
        +13
        what's wrong ? in the 44th west opened a second front before helping us, and to prevent us from capturing western Europe, and as a bonus, the winner status in WW2.
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 6 November 2015 12: 00 New
          0
          aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which will take part in the operation against the IG
          Well, if against the IG, then fine, welcome!
          But if what’s wrong, then as L.Akhedzhakova says (I don’t like her “something”!):
          "Forgive us French for our" Caliber "and" Varshavyanka "and ...!"
        2. aleks 62 next
          aleks 62 next 6 November 2015 12: 14 New
          +1
          ..... and in order to prevent us from capturing western Europe, well, as a bonus, the winner status in WW2.

          ... The comparison is not very .... If only because of all sides (in Syria), only ours are present there legitimately .... Like not to say .... And if the "partners" fit in, then it is not known with which consequences for themselves ..... Until the end, it is not necessary to dismiss international institutions ....
          1. Irokez
            Irokez 6 November 2015 13: 02 New
            +1
            Quote: aleks 62 next
            If only because of all sides (in Syria), only ours are present there legitimately.

            Well, there is also Iraq which is fighting ISIS and Turkey, like, well, the Kurds. Therefore, we can assume that they will not fight in Syria, but in Iraq where they are bombing ISIS so far, although not so intensively, but it is probably comparable to the Shtatniks.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 6 November 2015 20: 04 New
            +1
            Quote: aleks 62 next
            And if the "partners" fit in, then it is not known with what consequences for themselves.

            Frogs are going to repeat Libya, such as "have fun, bomb", forgetting that thousands of Muslims have filled the country. And no one will guarantee that among them there are no ISIS emissaries ...
            I think you won’t have to wait long ... yes
    2. vodolaz
      vodolaz 6 November 2015 12: 08 New
      -5
      Yes, with one small missile boat we will do more than frogs with the help of an aircraft carrier.
    3. bornikrub
      bornikrub 6 November 2015 12: 12 New
      +9
      Keitel Zhukov about the French:
      Did these ones defeat us too?
    4. Finches
      Finches 6 November 2015 12: 14 New
      +2
      It’s bad that France has only the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier .... But if there was such a man at the helm of France, then she would really deploy an aviation-sea group to destroy ISIS, and not because now she would play the role of Tobacco under the overseas Sherkhan ...!
    5. DMB_95
      DMB_95 6 November 2015 12: 20 New
      +3
      Well, if they just spin there for a look .. And then they can accidentally (or specifically) bomb some village or hospital, and they will scream that the Russians bombed it.
    6. vovanpain
      vovanpain 6 November 2015 12: 20 New
      +14
      Quote: Irokez
      And for what type it seems that they were in the area of ​​ISIS battles. How to really fight so nobody, and how to share the victory, then all at once.
      I have already seen it somewhere.

      So do I.
    7. slaw14
      slaw14 6 November 2015 13: 08 New
      +3
      Mao Zedong described the victory of the USSR in 1945:
      "When the bear began to triumph over the lion, the vultures came flying to divide the skins."
      In Syria, the same thing may happen.
    8. Alexander Tot
      Alexander Tot 6 November 2015 13: 17 New
      -3
      Aviazhestyanka will not fight there - swim. Pride to raise, otherwise it would be very proud of Francois on a moped.
    9. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 6 November 2015 16: 47 New
      0
      Quote: Irokez
      I have already seen it somewhere.

      Opening 2 fronts, mattresses learning a freebie, etc.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 6 November 2015 17: 14 New
        0
        Quote: tronin.maxim
        Opening 2 fronts, mattresses learning a freebie, etc.

        Vultures arrive at the carcass section !!
    10. pvv113
      pvv113 6 November 2015 17: 38 New
      +4
      Maybe this is it?
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. just exp
      just exp 6 November 2015 11: 59 New
      +4
      Obama’s boot does not give them peace. and not only to them. and the deutsche also weighed from time to time.
  3. just exp
    just exp 6 November 2015 11: 57 New
    +2
    they are now all NATO moved to Syria against our base.
    1. meriem1
      meriem1 6 November 2015 12: 23 New
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      Wow, how they want to participate, as in 45!
      Where have you been before?


      There will be goals. On the Discovery channel, a brain was pumped here ... Calling Eurofighter and Rafal the best cars in the world)))) Well. They will see DRY and choke. Everything goes to trouble, but the knees are not shaking at US !!! Fun time.
      1. just exp
        just exp 6 November 2015 13: 09 New
        +1
        blatantly Saxons on eurofighter flushed Indians on dryers.
        so let them spot yourself in all places than they end up mess with the Russians.
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 6 November 2015 11: 58 New
    0
    Wow, how they want to participate, as in 45!
    Where have you been before?
  5. Decathlon
    Decathlon 6 November 2015 11: 58 New
    +3
    Change the rank of "accomplices" to the rank of "allies" ?! Changed shoes ...
    1. just exp
      just exp 6 November 2015 12: 07 New
      +3
      Do you believe that they really will act against IS?
      IMHO NATO is just building up a military group there, and it will be difficult to explain if the United States begins to send a bunch of military men there, so they are sent from different countries, they say it's not the United States going to butt with Russians here.
      1. aleks 62 next
        aleks 62 next 6 November 2015 12: 17 New
        +3
        .... IMHO NATO is just building up a military group there ...

        ... Well, yes .... In order to control and, if necessary, block the actions of the Russian Navy .... It is no secret that our naval group has the functions of cover (air defense), including ... lol
  6. lukke
    lukke 6 November 2015 11: 59 New
    0
    An interesting step - and under whom we will lie, gentlemen, paddles? although the question is rhetorical. But the question is - the states in Syria are also outside the "invitation", so it will be possible to bring down the trough ?! or whatever takes off from him ...
  7. marinier
    marinier 6 November 2015 11: 59 New
    +6
    Proshu proshenij u gaspod Moderator, Administrator, no ia segodnia rugat liagushatnik-holland !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    lU4SHE BI eti prosti-gospodi navesti poriadok met ebdo u sebia doma.
    Tam ize est Shef-XOZIAIN VKS RUSSLAND.
  8. Shuttle
    Shuttle 6 November 2015 12: 01 New
    +3
    An aircraft carrier is good, but it would be better if they carefully listened to De Gaulle himself.
    http://inosmi.ru/world/20150720/229189212.html
  9. Wolka
    Wolka 6 November 2015 12: 07 New
    0
    yeah, again the demonstration of the flag ...
  10. Rash
    Rash 6 November 2015 12: 08 New
    -1
    A rare French aircraft carrier will sail to the middle of the Mediterranean Sea wink
    1. X Y Z
      X Y Z 6 November 2015 12: 22 New
      -1
      Because the reserves of oysters and beaujolais will quickly run out.
    2. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 6 November 2015 13: 03 New
      -2
      Quote: Rash
      A rare French aircraft carrier will sail to the middle of the Mediterranean Sea wink

      -Do you have any accidents at the construction site? winked
      -No... request
      -Will be ... yes
  11. knn54
    knn54 6 November 2015 12: 19 New
    0
    Why not "stick on" ...
  12. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 6 November 2015 12: 23 New
    0
    They are unlucky with them, not an aircraft carrier, but some kind of a boatman. After the upcoming exit (and most likely, not having completed it), they will again put it to the wall for repair.
    They did a thing to just be, now mess with it, not knowing why this suitcase is armless. Now at least they have come up with a plausible reason, so that it does not just rust.
  13. vladimirw
    vladimirw 6 November 2015 12: 32 New
    0
    Have you decided to open a second front? And then they’ll take Berlin!
  14. Merchant
    Merchant 6 November 2015 12: 40 New
    +1
    This so-called coalition first feeds the bandits and forbids them from bombing, and then when they started crumbling them, they are more likely to get a wedding cake !!!!
  15. roskot
    roskot 6 November 2015 12: 46 New
    +1
    Our partners stirred. There is no sense from them, but their presence will be indicated.
  16. skrabplus.ru
    skrabplus.ru 6 November 2015 13: 46 New
    +1
    IT IS NOT GOOD, IT IS NECESSARY TO STRENGTHEN OUR BEACH
  17. bad
    bad 6 November 2015 13: 48 New
    +1
    how many lovers of someone else’s hands rake in the heat .. did you want glory? and where were you before? .. stop
  18. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 6 November 2015 14: 25 New
    +1
    Again, all with the filing of the United States. The Turks stepped up, Israel, France .... + 50 American specialists .... I wonder what they thought ??? what
  19. Abrekkos
    Abrekkos 6 November 2015 14: 57 New
    -2
    Quote: aleks 62 next
    that of all parties (in Syria), only ours are present there legitimately .... Like it or not .... And if the "partners" fit in, then it is not known with what consequences for themselves ..... To completely discount international institutions are also not necessary ....


    Were you in Syria yourself?

    Who legitimized us? The son of an “Arab butcher” (what was the name of H. Assad’s dad in the Middle East and Syria itself) and fundamentalist Iran? Is there anyone else? Oh, and Hezbollah ... Tell me who your friend is and I will tell you who you are.

    Frenchmen, too, a coalition from 70 countries legitimized.

    Let's talk straight. This is not a question of legitimacy, but the question of what if Assad falls, then we will lose all our influence in the Middle East. And we cannot allow this.

    And without us, Assad will surely fall. Little depends on him here - the shadow of his father determines the hatred of a significant part of his own people. It’s not for nothing that our people don’t insist on preserving Assad - he’s too an odious figure for anyone who knows at least something about the history of the region. Although Bashar himself is probably just a hostage to the past.

    So there’s nothing for us to hide behind the fig leaf of legitimacy. We are not blue thieves.

    You just need to defend your interests and the very fact of their presence in this region simply and without complexes.
    Americans won’t get rid of their lack of bounds and, as a result, the coalition against Assad from 70 states. They would say against the Saudis, and against them 60-70 states would have accumulated. Because "with a strong stupid nonsense."
    1. Alexander Tot
      Alexander Tot 6 November 2015 15: 24 New
      0
      Abrekkos, "fundamentalist Iran" was not a curse word, but sounded common noun. I lived in Iran for almost 8 years. Good people. "a coalition from 70 countries" is a stranger entity and you know why. You can find out anything, but go straight only if you know the ford, and the East, like the Tarkovsky Zone (Stalker) (the Strugatsky Picnic on the sidelines). strong of experts, electorate ....
  20. afrikanez
    afrikanez 6 November 2015 17: 57 New
    0
    I wonder why, to this day, they did not send their aircraft carrier? America said “NECESSARY”, the French answered “IS”. Well puppet tochnik fool
  21. TURAR
    TURAR 6 November 2015 18: 50 New
    0
    De Gaulle is a noteworthy name) to the situation. It seems that it was already somewhere.
  22. Old26
    Old26 6 November 2015 23: 24 New
    0
    Quote: vodolaz
    Yes, with one small missile boat we will do more than frogs with the help of an aircraft carrier.

    Yeah, now appeared "small missile boat". Missile cruiser this RTO was already called, now it has become a "small missile boat."
    And I wonder why we will do more. ONE small missile boat than the French with the help of an aircraft carrier. Moreover, he has not yet participated in battles, and some experts here know that he will make less than one small missile boat ...
    Maybe this "small missile boat" will drown Charles somewhere in the Indian Ocean or the Atlantic ??? Enlighten us already ...
    Self-esteem swells before our eyes, rolls over ...
  23. Old26
    Old26 6 November 2015 23: 33 New
    0
    Quote: afrikanez
    I wonder why, to this day, they did not send their aircraft carrier?

    As far as I remember, it was under repair with a recharge of the reactor