Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Space Forces VKS: Not only airplanes and helicopters were sent to Syria, but also air defense missile systems

The commander-in-chief of the Russian Aerospace Forces, Viktor Bondarev, told the media that not only airplanes and helicopters were delivered to Syria, but also ground-based air defense systems. We are talking about anti-aircraft missile systems. Victor Bondarev quotes "TVNZ":


We calculated all possible threats. We put there not only fighters, attack aircraft, bombers, helicopters, but also anti-aircraft missile systems. Because there may be various kinds of force majeure. Suppose the hijacking of a combat aircraft in the territory of a state bordering on Syria and striking us. And we must be ready for this.


Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Space Forces VKS: Not only airplanes and helicopters were sent to Syria, but also air defense missile systems


At the same time, the information attracting attention comes from the press service of the People’s Council of the Syrian Arab Republic. Today, the People’s Council of Syria (the country's parliament) has decided to raise the retirement age for Syrian pilots to 65 years. Syrian news agency SANA reports that, according to the Syrian ministers and parliamentarians, this will help in military conditions "to usefully apply the rich experience of personnel pilots of the country's air force." It is particularly emphasized that we are talking about the involvement of representatives of the flight crew of a very solid age, not so much during the flights, as in conducting classes and instructing work with the young military personnel of the Syrian Air Force.
Photos used:
"Military Review"
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Maksus 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    So the “Shell” immediately flashed in the photo, even before the start of striking. What did everyone talk about them today?
    1. ver_ 5 November 2015 14: 57 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      ..a here everything is clear as a white day - if a stranger in the zone, then what is it ..
      1. _Vladislav_ 5 November 2015 14: 58 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        It can be assumed that this is not only the S-300, but Armor and Buki.
        (Short-range air defense, middle arm, long-range.)

        Usually, when it comes to protecting some significant (strategic) objects, they use a full bouquet.
        In this case, you can not worry about the intersection in the air of Russian and American aircraft. Such air defense is a weapon of guaranteed retaliation.

        PS
        Operational-tactical complexes can become a very good help for the army of the SAR.
        1. remy 5 November 2015 15: 18 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          35 ° 35'37 "N 35 ° 50'53" E position SAM system S-300В4
          1. just exp 5 November 2015 15: 24 New
            • 41
            • 0
            +41
            You don’t understand anything, we all do this to protect Europe from Iranian missiles.
            and not at all against the Americans.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Aleksandr72 5 November 2015 15: 48 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Exactly. wassat Always adhere to this particular version. We are white and fluffy. Our air defense is the most peaceful in the whole world. And we don’t let anyone fly, because it’s because we don’t fly (this is about anti-aircraft gunners).
              I have the honor.
          2. Bongo 5 November 2015 15: 54 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: remy
            35 ° 35'37 "N 35 ° 50'53" E position SAM system S-300В4

            The position of the S-300B SAM looks like this:

            And do you seem to have radars for monitoring the air situation (in the picture) or do you have more recent pictures?
            1. just exp 5 November 2015 17: 22 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I don’t see anything like that in your first picture, if you are talking about the settings that are on the equipped positions, then I can’t understand how much B is, and not P’s? In a kind of caterpillar and they are equipped with a position as it is not really needed.
              1. Bongo 6 November 2015 05: 24 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: just EXPL
                I don’t see anything like that in your first picture, if you are talking about the settings that are on the equipped positions, then I can’t understand how much B is, and not P’s? In a kind of caterpillar and they are equipped with a position as it is not really needed.

                What can I say, probably you really "do not see" or have never been to the positions of the People's Commissariat of Defense. request C-300P look like this (snapshot). In appearance, even in the picture taken from above, the SPU and on-load tap-changer S-300P and S-300В are very different, it is impossible to confuse. hi
        2. Altona 5 November 2015 16: 02 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          It can be assumed that this is not only the S-300, but Armor and Buki.
          (Short-range air defense, middle arm, long-range.)

          --------------------
          S-300 radars can scan and monitor the situation in the sky of neighboring states with intense combat and civil aviation sky-Israel and Turkey, for example ...
      2. volot-voin 5 November 2015 15: 03 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: ver_
        and here everything is clear as a white day - if a stranger is in the zone, then what is it ..

        While the Americans promised, ours decided to make Syria a no-fly zone ..... for NATO aviation))))
        1. Alexey Lesogor 5 November 2015 15: 31 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Our rocket men also need to train in combat conditions and on potential friends. soldier
    2. Sid.74 5 November 2015 14: 59 New
      • 17
      • 0
      +17
      Quote: Maksus
      So "Pantsiri" immediately flashed on the photo


      Yeah, not news. yesMore and Krasuha-4 flashed.
      1. Wedmak 5 November 2015 16: 01 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Yes, not only flashed, immediately our military said that the airfield is guarded from the air, and from land, and from the sea. Actually, this is not even news, it is rather a hint for some overseas theorists who consider it possible to damage our equipment and personnel.
        1. Altona 5 November 2015 23: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          Yes, not only flashed, immediately our military said that the airfield is guarded from the air, and from land, and from the sea.

          ------------------------
          And the “Carapace” he can both surface and ground to control the attacker, if he dares of course ...
      2. lopvlad 5 November 2015 16: 09 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Sid.74
        Yeah, not news. yesAlso, Kraukha-4 flickered.


        this is not the supply of the Syrian army but the deployment of Russian equipment in Syria to cover the Russian air forces.
        Delivered и are directed have a completely different meaning.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Lord of the Sith 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    He said “delivered,” as if it were supplies to Syria. Probably meant "to carry out the operation, we also deployed air defense systems." Although there are both T-90 and BTR-82A, as well as electronic warfare systems, they appeared in the pictures a month ago.
    1. Geisenberg 5 November 2015 14: 59 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      He said “delivered,” as if it were supplies to Syria. Probably meant "to carry out the operation, we also deployed air defense systems." Although there are both T-90 and BTR-82A, as well as electronic warfare systems, they appeared in the pictures a month ago.


      Apparently there was a chance division of something serious, such as the S-300. He clearly said "rocket." Another thing is why is he making excuses?
      1. mvg
        mvg 5 November 2015 15: 10 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        There was infa about 2 S-300 divisions, but did not find the photo. As well as the fact that the S-300 in Syria was still when the Jews bombed the "BAL'y" and NIIC, near Damascus .. coming from Libya ..
        If the T-90S and BTR = 82A are visible in the pictures, the Shell-S also flicker, then by no means the smaller S-300 cars should be in the drawings .. (well, at least they would have photographed something).
        If they really would have delivered the S-300PMU2, such a star-striped srach would have risen.
    2. science fiction writer 5 November 2015 15: 02 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      He said "delivered" as if it supplies for Syria.

      Why not? Now the Syrians will learn them and there, after the operation of the air forces, the complexes will remain
  4. chikenous59 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I think they appeared there at the very moment when they started throwing planes. It would be logical ...
  5. roskot 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Youth should be taught by veterans. Correct solution.
  6. bad
    bad 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    [quote] [We have calculated all possible threats. We put there not only fighters, attack aircraft, bombers, helicopters, but also anti-aircraft missile systems. Because there can be various kinds of force majeure circumstances. Let's say hijacking a combat aircraft in the territory of a state adjacent to Syria and strike at us. And we should be ready for this / quote] ... it is said for everyone, but the meaning of what has been said is for "partners" laughing
  7. Black Colonel 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Without SAM, no military operation should be conducted. Fighters cannot be constantly in the sky! Moreover, at least two levels - short and medium range. You never mind what our "partners" would like!
  8. fox21h 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A subtle hint to our "partners" that they would not rock the boat to avoid cradles.
    1. ver_ 5 November 2015 15: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      ..a Turkey partner, or not? ...
      1. lukke 5 November 2015 15: 28 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        and Turkey is a partner, or not? ...
        Of course, when we have money or we can pile on in an adult way.
    2. Tusv 5 November 2015 15: 02 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Quote: fox21h
      A subtle hint to our "partners"

      This is not a hint. Direct text
      If you are knocked down, it is better to announce the theft.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Rostislav 5 November 2015 15: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So the “Shell” immediately flashed in the photo, even before the start of striking. What did everyone talk about them today?

    Nothing but an open warning to some.
    Although those and so the possibilities of defense should be explored, if any dirty trick was conceived.
    Maybe this is a signal to the mattresses about what is known about the impending provocation?
    1. padded jacket 5 November 2015 15: 11 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Most likely it’s the S-300, and better of course the S-400, which can guarantee the protection of our bases and the rest of Syria from possible attacks by the Israeli Air Force, Turkey, and possibly the USA.
      By the way, Buki, Pechery, Armor were also in Syria itself in 2012, but in view of their short range and inability to keep them in places of intense fighting, they could not give a decent response to the bombing of Syrian forces, for example, by the Israeli Air Force.
  11. mvg
    mvg 5 November 2015 15: 15 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Syria's air defense in the middle of 2000 was one of the strongest in the BV. Yielding to Israel, Turkey (including the German Patriots) and the SA. Now - having lost a lot of radar and air defense bases, and communication centers .. I think only Damascus, Tartus (from the sea) and Latakia are protected segmentally, and even that is not a fact that long-range air defense. Against Israel (if they want) and Turkey - little consolation.
  12. slizhov 5 November 2015 15: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, very correctly said, but sent to enemies in the forehead!
    If vdruuuug ... steal! )))
  13. vell.65 5 November 2015 15: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Geisenberg
    why is he making excuses?

    I think that he didn’t make excuses, but explained that for protection from some, the defense would be thorough, that’s why they scratch the back of his head. what
  14. solovey 5 November 2015 15: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And imagine if the stripes with their coalition began to interfere with our VKS, therefore, first of all, they put complexes there, etc. to protect the base !!! No wonder everything is like a book wink
  15. Urri 5 November 2015 15: 26 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    1 "On the third day, the Vigilant Falcon saw that the fourth wall was missing in the barn ..." - “Pagtnёgam” a month ago was put under her nose a “leak” photo with blurry contours of the S-400 components.

    2 "Listen carefully to the interlocutor ..." - air defense system, unlike air defense systems - these are S-300PMU, S-300PMU2 and S-400. And that’s it. Oh, and also the S-300VM4 And it is stated that it was delivered by the air defense system, and not by the air defense system. And not one of these SAMs to any "partner" of any faith - even to a Scientologist, even to a Jew, or even to a Sunni - is never a gift, if that.

    3 Widely known in narrow circles, close to the General Staff of the Russian Federation, a person with the nickname "BS" at the Global Adventure forum about this, as well as the fact that any BM-21 Grad rocket or rocket launcher has slippers and not only at the air base " Hmeimim "has something to bring down, and this" is what "has never" Shell "- it just doesn’t write in plain text. But, as the unforgettable Dersu Uzala used to say: "There are eyes, look no ..."
  16. duchy 5 November 2015 15: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Creation of a no-fly zone over the territory of Syria;
    1.Allows you to keep the state within its former borders;
    2. Ensure that terrorists are deprived of air and equipment supplies;
    3. It will repulse the hunt of some "friendly states" to bomb the allies of the Syrian Army - the Kurds;
    4. The most important thing is to limit the actions of the Strategic Missile Forces, both their Air Force and the ground contingent for "grabbing" (liberating) from terrorists and territories in order to establish their own "democracy."
  17. chunga-changa 5 November 2015 15: 45 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    hijacking a combat aircraft on the territory of a state adjacent to Syria and striking at us.

    What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?
    1. Ramzaj99 5 November 2015 20: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: chunga-changa
      What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?

      This is the same as the Americans build missile defense from the "mythical" Iranian missiles))
      1. LEX SU 6 November 2015 08: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well, of course! the FSA and the Turks will not directly harm, but "hijacking" of the type is possible ...
        watch on all CNN TVs in the world
        "ISIS ISLAND BARMALES HAVE DROPPED F35 FROM OUR BASE ... AND BECAUSE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO MANAGE SUCH DIFFERENT EQUIPMENT BACK TO THE SAME AIR BASE ...
  18. Urri 5 November 2015 15: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And evil tongues are looking for a useful gadget to the air defense system under the name "Sky-M", they are full-blown talk. And if this is so, then everything above 25 m in Turkey, Israel, in the Sinai, in Jordan and, in part, in Saudi Arabia, can begin to forget about its stealth.
    And it wasn’t necessary to overtake the F-15 in the F-15C version of Ijirlik the other day. They didn’t understand the joke, and they didn’t joke in response, IMHO
  19. mvg
    mvg 5 November 2015 15: 59 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    S-300VM4 is, like, a military missile defense system. Basically, it is imprisoned under the ballistic missile range of up to 2500 km (Pershing :-), Skudy, Tochka-U) and barrage aircraft like AWACS), why is it in Syria? Those. for purposes that don’t maneuver very much ... I hope the rebels don’t have SCADs .. But some Turkish F-16 thread could accidentally flop over Kurds with friendly fire and miss the base in Latakia. They, these planning miracle bombs, under a hundred km, sometimes plan .. with a fair wind, of course :-). Therefore, it would be nice for the Syrians to deliver Antei-2500, and nobody will shout strongly, and, it seems, modern ..
    PS: Purely my opinion. Do not deliver obsolete weapons to a hot spot, if you want, do not mess up. Everyone should see that only the best is on sale. So that Jews could not bomb with impunity the suburbs of Damascus, supposedly "covered" S-300. Arrived, fell - cooled to flying. And not so that I would still like to ..
    1. 31rus 5 November 2015 16: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You were wrong, the shot and video of the ISIL equipment parade, where they showed one Scud installation in the Iranian version, so that everything can be
    2. 31rus 5 November 2015 16: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You were wrong about the shot and video of the ISIS equipment parade, where they showed one Scud installation in the Iranian version, so that everything can be, and the fact that there are no pictures of them, as well as the fact that the strength of the air group is still unknown, is the merit of the reb troops (a cloud of 600 km, but a bigger spot), that's why none of the "partners" did not want to fly, without an agreement "on air interaction), look for yourself on the press and on the map, where the coalition used to fly and where now
  20. Urri 5 November 2015 16: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: chunga-changa
    What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?


    The aircraft will hit the base, report on the implementation, it will be blown up by a pre-laid mine over the air from a satellite, and they will say: stole, livestock, a combat vehicle. Maniac loner with a motor. We don’t know anything. We are not ousting
  21. gorku68 5 November 2015 17: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I am glad that we explain everything! ALL against terrorists ALL! Learned the language of amers. We are not threatening anyone, not against anyone, the whole threat of Iran ... uh ... ISIS! And put it if necessary!
  22. KnightRider 5 November 2015 18: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Regarding the presence of our air defense in Syria, no one thinks I doubted. The question is different, is there anything else besides the Shell?

    Regarding helicopters on a nearby site, here's what I read:
    Helicopters Mi-24 VKS of Russia near Palmyra.
    The representative of the American Pentagon said that according to their data, five Russian helicopters were transferred to the Tiyas base - this is one of the largest Syrian air force bases located in the desert between Homs and the militants of the Caliphate Palmyra. An indirect confirmation of this can serve as this report of our Zvezda TV channel from the position of the Syrian army near Palmyra, which shows the Mi-24P Russian Air Force supporting the Syrian military. Previously, our helicopters in that area did not work.

    If you believe the US Department of Defense, ours are also being equipped at the Syrian air force bases in Hama and Shairat near Homs. Perhaps they will also be used as advanced bases for helicopters.

    Here's the video
  23. Anisim1977 5 November 2015 18: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done - the planes will fly away sooner or later, but the sky will remain under lock and key.
    1. Victorio 6 November 2015 01: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Anisim1977
      Well done - the planes will fly away sooner or later, but the sky will remain under lock and key.

      ====
      turntables still work there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE19roxv4So
  24. Buffalo 5 November 2015 21: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A parody of the TASS message from the times of the Sino-Soviet conflict in
    area about. Damansky.

    `Peaceful Soviet tractor plowed land in the area of ​​the Soviet-Chinese
    borders. Unexpectedly, from the Chinese side, along Soviet territory
    shots rang out.
    In response to the provocation, the courageous crew of the Soviet tractor opened
    immediately firing at adjacent territory from all types
    small arms.
    As a result of a short-lived battle, the enemy suffered heavy casualties and
    technique. Chinese Maoists were forced to retreat inland
    territory, and the crew of the Soviet tractor continued creative work,
    aimed at building communism in the USSR.
    In connection with the incident, TASS is authorized to declare: in the event of the recurrence of such provocations, the Soviet Government reserves the right to place at the disposal of the Chairman of the Guards, Red Banner Armored Collective Farm "Path to Victory", Major General Ivanov, a train of combines ... laughing
  25. Lapot 5 November 2015 21: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    New video of Russian air strikes in Syria in one clip with a musical background (5 in 1):
  26. Dikson 5 November 2015 22: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, then there was a precedent already ... Maybe whose drone flew into our zone ... Or maybe it's a hint of the possibility of 9/11 in the Syrian version? Again, in the light of Egyptian events and the obvious position of the British ... And actually, I still do not understand why Syria, as an independent state and a member of the UN, will not ask Ban Ki-moon and other things, on what basis does everyone fly over the territory of a sovereign state who is lazy? If Russia was officially officially called there, then no one called the others?
    1. Buffalo 5 November 2015 23: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There were such cases with drones of adversaries. They were not shot down, but pretty badly so that everyone could understand.
  27. LEX SU 6 November 2015 08: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    General Bondarev subtly hints that if the partners decide to fool around and shoot down / bomb ... and then DISCHARGE EVERYTHING FOR THE PLANE Hijacking ... such as not rolling (everything will be told, a finger is shown lol Konashenkovsky and live)