Military Review

Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Space Forces VKS: Not only airplanes and helicopters were sent to Syria, but also air defense missile systems

50
The commander-in-chief of the Russian Aerospace Forces, Viktor Bondarev, told the media that not only airplanes and helicopters were delivered to Syria, but also ground-based air defense systems. We are talking about anti-aircraft missile systems. Victor Bondarev quotes "TVNZ":


We calculated all possible threats. We put there not only fighters, attack aircraft, bombers, helicopters, but also anti-aircraft missile systems. Because there may be various kinds of force majeure. Suppose the hijacking of a combat aircraft in the territory of a state bordering on Syria and striking us. And we must be ready for this.


Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Space Forces VKS: Not only airplanes and helicopters were sent to Syria, but also air defense missile systems


At the same time, the information attracting attention comes from the press service of the People’s Council of the Syrian Arab Republic. Today, the People’s Council of Syria (the country's parliament) has decided to raise the retirement age for Syrian pilots to 65 years. Syrian news agency SANA reports that, according to the Syrian ministers and parliamentarians, this will help in military conditions "to usefully apply the rich experience of personnel pilots of the country's air force." It is particularly emphasized that we are talking about the involvement of representatives of the flight crew of a very solid age, not so much during the flights, as in conducting classes and instructing work with the young military personnel of the Syrian Air Force.
Photos used:
"Military Review"
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Maksus
    Maksus 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    16
    Так "Панцири" сразу на фото мелькали, еще до начала нанесения ударов. Чего сегодня все о них заговорили?
    1. ver_
      ver_ 5 November 2015 14: 57 New
      +2
      ..a here everything is clear as a white day - if a stranger in the zone, then what is it ..
      1. _Vladislav_
        _Vladislav_ 5 November 2015 14: 58 New
        +7
        It can be assumed that this is not only the S-300, but Armor and Buki.
        (Short-range air defense, middle arm, long-range.)

        Usually, when it comes to protecting some significant (strategic) objects, they use a full bouquet.
        In this case, you can not worry about the intersection in the air of Russian and American aircraft. Such air defense is a weapon of guaranteed retaliation.

        PS
        Operational-tactical complexes can become a very good help for the army of the SAR.
        1. remy
          remy 5 November 2015 15: 18 New
          +2
          35°35'37"N 35°50'53"E позиция ЗРК С-300В4
          1. just exp
            just exp 5 November 2015 15: 24 New
            41
            You don’t understand anything, we all do this to protect Europe from Iranian missiles.
            and not at all against the Americans.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Aleksandr72
              Aleksandr72 5 November 2015 15: 48 New
              +7
              Exactly. wassat Always adhere to this particular version. We are white and fluffy. Our air defense is the most peaceful in the whole world. And we don’t let anyone fly, because it’s because we don’t fly (this is about anti-aircraft gunners).
              I have the honor.
          2. Bongo
            Bongo 5 November 2015 15: 54 New
            +6
            Quote: remy
            35°35'37"N 35°50'53"E позиция ЗРК С-300В4

            The position of the S-300B SAM looks like this:

            And do you seem to have radars for monitoring the air situation (in the picture) or do you have more recent pictures?
            1. just exp
              just exp 5 November 2015 17: 22 New
              0
              I don’t see anything like that in your first picture, if you are talking about the settings that are on the equipped positions, then I can’t understand how much B is, and not P’s? In a kind of caterpillar and they are equipped with a position as it is not really needed.
              1. Bongo
                Bongo 6 November 2015 05: 24 New
                +1
                Quote: just EXPL
                I don’t see anything like that in your first picture, if you are talking about the settings that are on the equipped positions, then I can’t understand how much B is, and not P’s? In a kind of caterpillar and they are equipped with a position as it is not really needed.

                Что я могу сказать, наверное вы действительно "не видите" или никогда не были на позициях зрдн. request C-300P look like this (snapshot). In appearance, even in the picture taken from above, the SPU and on-load tap-changer S-300P and S-300В are very different, it is impossible to confuse. hi
        2. Altona
          Altona 5 November 2015 16: 02 New
          +2
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          It can be assumed that this is not only the S-300, but Armor and Buki.
          (Short-range air defense, middle arm, long-range.)

          --------------------
          S-300 radars can scan and monitor the situation in the sky of neighboring states with intense combat and civil aviation sky-Israel and Turkey, for example ...
      2. volot-voin
        volot-voin 5 November 2015 15: 03 New
        +3
        Quote: ver_
        and here everything is clear as a white day - if a stranger is in the zone, then what is it ..

        While the Americans promised, ours decided to make Syria a no-fly zone ..... for NATO aviation))))
        1. Alexey Lesogor
          Alexey Lesogor 5 November 2015 15: 31 New
          +2
          Our rocket men also need to train in combat conditions and on potential friends. soldier
    2. Sid.74
      Sid.74 5 November 2015 14: 59 New
      17
      Quote: Maksus
      Так "Панцири" сразу на фото мелькали


      Yeah, not news. yesMore and Krasuha-4 flashed.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 5 November 2015 16: 01 New
        +3
        Yes, not only flashed, immediately our military said that the airfield is guarded from the air, and from land, and from the sea. Actually, this is not even news, it is rather a hint for some overseas theorists who consider it possible to damage our equipment and personnel.
        1. Altona
          Altona 5 November 2015 23: 04 New
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          Yes, not only flashed, immediately our military said that the airfield is guarded from the air, and from land, and from the sea.

          ------------------------
          А "Панцирь" он же может и надводно, и наземно уконтрапупить злоумышленника, если тот отважится конечно...
      2. lopvlad
        lopvlad 5 November 2015 16: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: Sid.74
        Yeah, not news. yesAlso, Kraukha-4 flickered.


        this is not the supply of the Syrian army but the deployment of Russian equipment in Syria to cover the Russian air forces.
        Delivered и are directed have a completely different meaning.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    +4
    Он так сказал "поставлены", как будто это поставки для Сирии. Наверно имелось ввиду "для выполнения операции мы развернули также ЗРК". Хотя там и Т-90 и БТР-82А стоят, а также системы РЭБ, еще на снимках месяц назад засветились.
    1. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 5 November 2015 14: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Он так сказал "поставлены", как будто это поставки для Сирии. Наверно имелось ввиду "для выполнения операции мы развернули также ЗРК". Хотя там и Т-90 и БТР-82А стоят, а также системы РЭБ, еще на снимках месяц назад засветились.


      Судя по всему туда случайно дивизион чего-то серьезного, типа с-300 поставили. Он же четко сказал "ракетные". Другое дело почему он оправдывается ?
      1. mvg
        mvg 5 November 2015 15: 10 New
        +3
        Была инфа о 2-ух дивизионах С-300, но фото не нашел. Так же как и то, что С-300 в Сирии была еще тогда, когда евреи бомбили "БАЛ'ы" и НИИЦ, близ Дамаска.. зайдя с Ливии..
        If the T-90S and BTR = 82A are visible in the pictures, the Shell-S also flicker, then by no means the smaller S-300 cars should be in the drawings .. (well, at least they would have photographed something).
        If they really would have delivered the S-300PMU2, such a star-striped srach would have risen.
    2. science fiction writer
      science fiction writer 5 November 2015 15: 02 New
      +6
      Он так сказал "поставлены", как будто это supplies for Syria.

      Why not? Now the Syrians will learn them and there, after the operation of the air forces, the complexes will remain
  4. chikenous59
    chikenous59 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    +4
    I think they appeared there at the very moment when they started throwing planes. It would be logical ...
  5. roskot
    roskot 5 November 2015 14: 54 New
    +2
    Youth should be taught by veterans. Correct solution.
  6. bad
    bad 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +3
    [quote][Мы просчитали все возможные угрозы. Мы туда поставили не только истребители, штурмовики, бомбардировщики, вертолёты, но и зенитные ракетные системы. Потому что могут быть различного рода форс-мажорные обстоятельства. Допустим, угон боевого самолёта на территории сопредельного с Сирией государства и нанесение удара по нам. И к этому мы должны быть готовы/quote]...сказано для всех но смысл сказанного-для "партнёров" laughing
  7. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +4
    Без ЗРК никакая военная операция не должна проводиться. Не могут же постоянно находиться в небе истребители! Причём, как минимум, двух уровней - малой и средней дальности. Мало ли что вздумается нашим "партнёрам"!
  8. fox21h
    fox21h 5 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +2
    Тонкий намек нашим "партнерам", что бы не рыпались во избежание люлей.
    1. ver_
      ver_ 5 November 2015 15: 00 New
      0
      ..a Turkey partner, or not? ...
      1. lukke
        lukke 5 November 2015 15: 28 New
        +4
        and Turkey is a partner, or not? ...
        Of course, when we have money or we can pile on in an adult way.
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 5 November 2015 15: 02 New
      11
      Quote: fox21h
      Тонкий намек нашим "партнерам"

      This is not a hint. Direct text
      If you are knocked down, it is better to announce the theft.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Rostislav
    Rostislav 5 November 2015 15: 01 New
    +2
    Так "Панцири" сразу на фото мелькали, еще до начала нанесения ударов. Чего сегодня все о них заговорили?

    Nothing but an open warning to some.
    Although those and so the possibilities of defense should be explored, if any dirty trick was conceived.
    Maybe this is a signal to the mattresses about what is known about the impending provocation?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 5 November 2015 15: 11 New
      -1
      Most likely it’s the S-300, and better of course the S-400, which can guarantee the protection of our bases and the rest of Syria from possible attacks by the Israeli Air Force, Turkey, and possibly the USA.
      By the way, Buki, Pechery, Armor were also in Syria itself in 2012, but in view of their short range and inability to keep them in places of intense fighting, they could not give a decent response to the bombing of Syrian forces, for example, by the Israeli Air Force.
  11. mvg
    mvg 5 November 2015 15: 15 New
    +3
    Syria's air defense in the middle of 2000 was one of the strongest in the BV. Yielding to Israel, Turkey (including the German Patriots) and the SA. Now - having lost a lot of radar and air defense bases, and communication centers .. I think only Damascus, Tartus (from the sea) and Latakia are protected segmentally, and even that is not a fact that long-range air defense. Against Israel (if they want) and Turkey - little consolation.
  12. slizhov
    slizhov 5 November 2015 15: 16 New
    0
    Well, very correctly said, but sent to enemies in the forehead!
    If vdruuuug ... steal! )))
  13. vell.65
    vell.65 5 November 2015 15: 17 New
    0
    Quote: Geisenberg
    why is he making excuses?

    I think that he didn’t make excuses, but explained that for protection from some, the defense would be thorough, that’s why they scratch the back of his head. what
  14. solovey
    solovey 5 November 2015 15: 20 New
    0
    And imagine if the stripes with their coalition began to interfere with our VKS, therefore, first of all, they put complexes there, etc. to protect the base !!! No wonder everything is like a book wink
  15. Urri
    Urri 5 November 2015 15: 26 New
    +6
    1 "На третий день Зоркий Сокол увидел, что в сарае не хватает четвёртой стены..." - "Пагтнёгам" ещё месяц назад была под нос положена "утечка" фото с расплывчатыми контурами компонентов С-400.

    2 "Внимательно слушайте собеседника..." - ЗРС, в отличие от ЗРК - это С-300ПМУ, С-300ПМУ2 и С-400. И всё. А, да, ещё С-300ВМ4. А заявлено, что поставили именно ЗРС, а не ЗРК. И ни одно из этих ЗРС любому "партнёгу" любого вероисповедания - хоть сайентологу, хоть иудею, хоть сунниту - ни разу не подарок, если что.

    3 Широко известный в узких кругах, близкий к ГШ РФ персон с ником "БШ" на форуме "Глобальной авантюры" об этом, а также о том, что любую ракету или реактивный снаряд БМ-21"Град" тапочников и не только у авиабазы "Хмеймим" есть чем сбить, и это "есть чем" ни разу не "Панцирь" - только что открытым текстом уже не пишет. Но, как говаривал незабвенный Дерсу Узала: "Глаза есть, посмотри нет..."
  16. duchy
    duchy 5 November 2015 15: 31 New
    0
    Creation of a no-fly zone over the territory of Syria;
    1.Allows you to keep the state within its former borders;
    2. Ensure that terrorists are deprived of air and equipment supplies;
    3. Отобьёт охоту некоторых "дружественных государств" бомбить союзников Сирийской Армии - курдов;
    4. Самое главное -- ограничит действия СПШ, как их ВВС так и наземного контингента по "прихватизации", (освобождения) от террористов, территорий с целью установлению своей "демократии".
  17. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 5 November 2015 15: 45 New
    -2
    hijacking a combat aircraft on the territory of a state adjacent to Syria and striking at us.

    What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?
    1. Ramzaj99
      Ramzaj99 5 November 2015 20: 13 New
      +1
      Quote: chunga-changa
      What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?

      Это так же , как американцы строят ПРО от "мифических" Иранских ракет))
      1. LEX SU
        LEX SU 6 November 2015 08: 31 New
        0
        ну конечно! впрямую ФША и Турки не будут пакостить, а вот "угон" типа -это возможно...
        watch on all CNN TVs in the world
        "БАРМАЛЕИ ИГИЛ УГНАЛИ F35 С НАШЕЙ БАЗЫ...А ПОТОМ ПОНЯВ ЧТО НЕ УМЕЮТ УПРАВЛЯТЬ ТАКОЙ СЛОЖНОЙ ТЕХНИКОЙ ВЕРНУЛИ НА ТУ ЖЕ АВИАБАЗУ..."
  18. Urri
    Urri 5 November 2015 15: 47 New
    0
    А злые языки ищщо по пользительную примочку к ЗРС под названием "Небо-М", полнокомплектно, поговаривают. И ежели оно так, то всё, что выше 25 м в Турции, Израиле, на Синае, в Иордании и, частично, в Саудии, может начинать забывать про свой стелс.
    And it wasn’t necessary to overtake the F-15 in the F-15C version of Ijirlik the other day. They didn’t understand the joke, and they didn’t joke in response, IMHO
  19. mvg
    mvg 5 November 2015 15: 59 New
    +3
    С-300ВМ4 - это, вроде, войсковая ПРО. В основном, заточена под БРСД дальностью до 2500 км (Першинги :-), Скады, Точки-У) и барражирующими самолетами типа ДРЛО), зачем она в Сирии? Т.е. для целей, которые не сильно маневрируют... Надеюсь СКАД'ов у повстанцев нет.. А вот какой-нить турецкий Ф-16 могет случано дружественным огнем бабахнуть по курдам, а "промахнуться" по базе в Латакии. Они же, эти планирующие чудо-бомбы, под сотню км, иногда, планируют.. при попутном ветре, конечно :-) . Поэтому Сирийцам бы неплохо Антей-2500 поставить, и сильно орать никто не будет, и, вроде, современно..
    P.S.: Чисто мое мнение. В горячую точку устаревшее вооружение не поставлять, если хочешь, не лажануться. Все должны видеть, что продается только лучшее. Чтоб не могли евреи безнаказанно бомбить пригороды Дамаска, якобы "прикрытые" С-300. Прилетел, упал - остыл к полетам. А не так, чтоб еще хотелось..
    1. 31rus
      31rus 5 November 2015 16: 26 New
      0
      Вы не правы был снимок и ролик парада техники ИГИЛ,где они демонстрировали одну установку "Скад"в иранской версии,так что все может быть
    2. 31rus
      31rus 5 November 2015 16: 26 New
      0
      Вы не правы был снимок и ролик парада техники ИГИЛ,где они демонстрировали одну установку "Скад"в иранской версии,так что все может быть,а то что нет их снимков,как и то что до сих пор неизвестен численный состав авиагруппы,так это заслуга войск рэб(облако в 600км,а больше пятно),вот потому не кто из "партнеров",не захотел летать,без договора "о воздушном взаимодействии),сами посмотрите и по прессе и по карте,где раньше и где сейчас летает коалиция
  20. Urri
    Urri 5 November 2015 16: 33 New
    0
    Quote: chunga-changa
    What is it like? Does the general expect a plane hijacking?


    The aircraft will hit the base, report on the implementation, it will be blown up by a pre-laid mine over the air from a satellite, and they will say: stole, livestock, a combat vehicle. Maniac loner with a motor. We don’t know anything. We are not ousting
  21. gorku68
    gorku68 5 November 2015 17: 25 New
    0
    I am glad that we explain everything! ALL against terrorists ALL! Learned the language of amers. We are not threatening anyone, not against anyone, the whole threat of Iran ... uh ... ISIS! And put it if necessary!
  22. KnightRider
    KnightRider 5 November 2015 18: 30 New
    +2
    Regarding the presence of our air defense in Syria, no one thinks I doubted. The question is different, is there anything else besides the Shell?

    Regarding helicopters on a nearby site, here's what I read:
    Helicopters Mi-24 VKS of Russia near Palmyra.
    Представитель американского Пентагона заявил, что по их данным пять российских вертолетов было переброшено на базу Тияс - это одна из крупнейших баз сирийских ВВС, расположенная в пустыне между Хомсом и занятой боевиками Халифата Пальмирой. Косвенным подтверждением этого может служить вот этот репортаж нашего телеканала "Звезда" с позиций сирийской армии около Пальмиры в котором показаны Ми-24П ВКС России, оказывающие поддержку сирийским военным. Ранее наши вертолеты в том районе не действовали.

    If you believe the US Department of Defense, ours are also being equipped at the Syrian air force bases in Hama and Shairat near Homs. Perhaps they will also be used as advanced bases for helicopters.

    Here's the video
  23. Anisim1977
    Anisim1977 5 November 2015 18: 41 New
    0
    Well done - the planes will fly away sooner or later, but the sky will remain under lock and key.
    1. Victorio
      Victorio 6 November 2015 01: 01 New
      0
      Quote: Anisim1977
      Well done - the planes will fly away sooner or later, but the sky will remain under lock and key.

      ====
      turntables still work there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE19roxv4So
  24. Buffalo
    Buffalo 5 November 2015 21: 21 New
    +1
    A parody of the TASS message from the times of the Sino-Soviet conflict in
    area about. Damansky.

    `Мирный советский трактор пахал землю в районе советско-китайской
    borders. Unexpectedly, from the Chinese side, along Soviet territory
    shots rang out.
    In response to the provocation, the courageous crew of the Soviet tractor opened
    immediately firing at adjacent territory from all types
    small arms.
    As a result of a short-lived battle, the enemy suffered heavy casualties and
    technique. Chinese Maoists were forced to retreat inland
    territory, and the crew of the Soviet tractor continued creative work,
    aimed at building communism in the USSR.
    In connection with the incident, TASS is authorized to declare: in the event of the recurrence of such provocations, the Soviet Government reserves the right to place at the disposal of the Chairman of the Guards, Red Banner Armored Collective Farm "Path to Victory", Major General Ivanov, a train of combines ... laughing
  25. Lapot
    Lapot 5 November 2015 21: 34 New
    0
    New video of Russian air strikes in Syria in one clip with a musical background (5 in 1):
  26. Dikson
    Dikson 5 November 2015 22: 11 New
    +1
    Well, then there was a precedent already ... Maybe whose drone flew into our zone ... Or maybe it's a hint of the possibility of 9/11 in the Syrian version? Again, in the light of Egyptian events and the obvious position of the British ... And actually, I still do not understand why Syria, as an independent state and a member of the UN, will not ask Ban Ki-moon and other things, on what basis does everyone fly over the territory of a sovereign state who is lazy? If Russia was officially officially called there, then no one called the others?
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 5 November 2015 23: 22 New
      0
      There were such cases with drones of adversaries. They were not shot down, but pretty badly so that everyone could understand.
  27. LEX SU
    LEX SU 6 November 2015 08: 27 New
    0
    General Bondarev subtly hints that if the partners decide to fool around and shoot down / bomb ... and then DISCHARGE EVERYTHING FOR THE PLANE Hijacking ... such as not rolling (everything will be told, a finger is shown lol Konashenkovsky and live)