Which countries did not support the initiative of Russia to completely abandon the placement of weapons in space

The Russian Federation, in collaboration with 26 countries, prepared a draft resolution on the inadmissibility of placing in outer space any weapons. The project is considered at the UN General Assembly. However, already at the stage of preliminary consideration of the draft anti-militarist initiative of the Russian Federation, such an initiative was identified as a clear opponent. This is the United States of America. How unexpected...

The American delegation voted against the adoption of the draft resolution in the so-called First Committee of the UN General Assembly, declaring that "the states do not yet have an understanding of what should be called a weapon in outer space." Apparently, there is no “understanding” exclusively on the American side, since the draft resolution clearly states that we are talking about any type of weapons based in space.

The delegation of the United States states that in subsequent reviews the resolution will abandon its support. The argument is already the next (quote RIA News):

The initiative involves only weapons that are based in space, and does not speak of ground-based anti-satellite weapons, which can aggravate, rather than reduce, distrust and possible miscalculations.

At the end of the material, it is worthwhile to submit a list of those states that, even on an anti-militarist initiative, are not capable of expressing their opinions and are forced to vote as the Washington hosts tell them. This is about Ukraine and Georgia, who spoke out against the draft resolution. It is noteworthy that voted against and Israel. Seven delegations abstained.

122 states have supported the initiative of the Russian Federation. Is it time for the Russian Foreign Ministry to make a statement that the United States and several other states are isolated from the rest of the world community ...

Comments

[oleg-gr]

Exceptional argumentation. About distrust and miscalculations - so a completely brilliant discovery.

[_Vladislav_]

Quote: oleg-gr

Exceptional argumentation. About distrust and miscalculations - so a completely brilliant discovery.

It is useless to contain these processes. I think that both Russia and the USA have decided everything for themselves for a long time (about the placement of weapons in space). The only question is the degree of readiness of each of the parties and an attempt to gain time.

It's like a nuclear weapon - the world will never give it up until it comes up with something else. Something more practical or destructive.

So is the satellite weapon. It will be - this is progress. And he cannot be stopped.

[Ahmed]

Quote: _Vladislav_

It is useless to contain these processes ...

That's right! Give me the Death Star on a low pivot!

[Weyland]

Something is confused ... in "Star Wars" there was Emperor PalPutin and his subordinate dark lord Darth MedVeidar.

[Skif83]

The argument is typical in their spirit: -

states do not yet have an understanding of what should be called weapons in outer space

They have a gradation of weapons for different mortality () ...
And we don’t need it, we need what the frames will be afraid of!

[JIaIIoTb]

And then they will be surprised how Russia quickly deployed a combat force in space so quickly. At the same time, completely forgetting that it was Russia that proposed not to allow these weapons into space. And there it turned out precisely because of the United States.

[hydrox]

Quote: JIaIIoTb

And there it turned out to be precisely because of the United States.

The weak-minded Yankees do not understand that this gives Russia an advantage, since our active devices are already hosted near the Amer’s intelligence satellites and at any moment they can deal with them like Boch with a turtle ...

[Lelek]

Quote: hydrox

like boch with a turtle ...

You probably mean "like WHOOT! With the tiles"?
And about the "active devices" did not Shoigu whisper to you?

[veksha50]

Quote: Lelek

And about the "active devices" did not Shoigu whisper to you?

In matters of space and anti-satellite weapons, we, the USSR, were far ahead of the Americans at the end of the 80s ... I hope that not all achievements have been sold, plundered and forgotten ...

And now there is at least one Russian satellite that "visits in the morning", sometimes approaching some US spacecraft ... It seems to me that these "walks" of our satellite gently warn the Americans about the capabilities of our aerospace forces ...

PS It’s not a secret for anyone that the most important task in the event (God forbid !!!) of unleashing large-scale hostilities will be to disable (destroy) the enemy’s space group ...

[Bayonet]

Quote: hydrox

since our active devices are already hosted near the Amer reconnaissance satellites and at any moment can do with them, like Boch with a turtle ...

Such large remote-controlled hats, which "completely dominate the vicinity ..." and are ready, at the first order, to brush everyone off !!! Passion for games with space wars does not pass in vain! Well, "Boh" to help you!

[veksha50]

Quote: Bayonet

Passion for games with space wars does not pass in vain!

Unfortunately, already at the end of the twentieth century, IT was far from games ...

PS And Buran was far from being developed for peaceful purposes ... And about ... they spoiled it, now it is unlikely to be restored, although there are talks about attempts to resume this program ... That's it - conversations ... Because Buran without Energy is nothing ... But there is no Energy either ... And whether Sarmat will be able to replace it in terms of power - so hardly ...

[Bayonet]

Quote: veksha50

Unfortunately, already at the end of the twentieth century, IT was far from games ...

This is all understandable, all the more ridiculous are the hat-making shouts of the idiots about the undivided rule of our maneuvering satellites. There is no end to work!

Quote: veksha50

And whether Sarmat will be able to replace it by power - so it is unlikely ...

I agree. But to launch anti-satellites or even attack ones, heavy missiles (such as Energia) are not needed. These are necessary for launching large stations.

[veksha50]

Quote: Bayonet

But to launch anti-satellites or even attack ones, heavy missiles (such as Energia) are not needed.

I had in mind the launch into orbit of the new Buran, whose program is being resumed on the sidelines ...

PS The possibility of reviving it is also in doubt ... People, technologies, documentation ... Well, the documentation most likely should be preserved ... but the rest ???

[Bayonet]

Quote: veksha50

. Well, the documentation is likely to be preserved ... but the rest ???

Sure! The program involved hundreds of enterprises, and this is equipment, technology and much more. It’s not easy to restore all this, and it’s unlikely that it will work out - much has been destroyed or even remained abroad. The past decades have also not been in vain, science has stepped forward, a lot of new things have appeared, so we need to make a new medium, just do it, not chatter!

[Bayonet]

Quote: Bayonet

Well, "Boh" to help you!

I did not expect another reaction from the idiots! Set cons - do not think with your head! There is not enough knowledge for another.

[Tor5]

A very likely outcome. I do not rule out that the Shtatovs have already swelled an incredible amount of funds on this topic (weapons in space) and therefore do not want to abandon it. Therefore, the argument is rather far-fetched.

[hydrox]

Quote: Tor5

Therefore, the argument is rather far-fetched.

That's right :: the Yankees are going to compete with us in space (fight!). Let's see how they succeed if even now our units sniffed them to the bolt.

[sabakina]

Our combat station "Almaz" seems to be in conservation ...

[quote]

Quote: hydrox

Quote: Tor5

Therefore, the argument is rather far-fetched.

That's right :: the Yankees are going to compete with us in space (fight!). Let's see how they succeed if even now our units sniffed them to the bolt.

Question: What? Question to you. What have they created over the past 15 years? (Period, satellite lifetime?) Secret? I think not.
All this is like an American scam: we don’t agree! We have great interest and opportunities, we have even advanced far! (In fact, we are in shit) BUT! You are afraid, tremble and invest in development! (Strain on finances). Race type weapons !!!
Thank you for the "good"! We will develop!

[Bayonet]

Quote: devis

What have they created over the past 15 years?

Well, for example, X – 37V. Or is it so - halam balam? What is known about his mission and capabilities? There may be enough hatred, but is it worth talking seriously?

[fazayek]

Yes, there is less and less objective people. They really believe that our space industry is more developed than that of amers

[udincev]

Quote: Tor5

I do not rule out that the Shtatovs have already swelled an incredible amount of funds on this topic (weapons in space) and therefore do not want to abandon it.

... and Georgia and Ukraine are planning to deploy their weapons in space.
And how can they vote for non-placement ?!

[oblako]

Well, we kind of wanted the best ... Now do not be offended ...

[Andryukha]

It seems ours decided to show how bad it is to have weapons in orbit:
They offered Peace to the world, the world community refused, so what if we can, then we bring out good green satellites.
Not for nothing we have the videoconferencing.

[NordUral]

This will be a logical conclusion from the voting results. A little bit later.

[vovanpain]

As soon as I read the headline I already realized that it was the USA, I read the news and there are exceptional mattresses as hypocrites.

[YGV-97219]

These goat husbands are probably developing something of this kind and therefore vote against!

[hydrox]

Weapons - such a thing :: always has been and always will be - weapons must be superior to the enemy, and the Americans even buy rocket engines from us!
And how did they gather their satellites into orbit?
Minutemen, or what?

[hydrox]

States have already found excuses, albeit weak and funny, but allowing them not to sign a UN resolution
They regret that there is no ISIS in space that could be fought until the end of time (as the Yankees do in Iraq and Afghanistan).

[Maksus]

But weren't treaties on the demilitarization of outer space adopted during the Cold War? Since the Yankees do not fit in now, they already have something for a campaign in orbit.

[Dezinto]

Again?

Star Wars?

[brasist]

And how can it be here without the main cosmos of Georgia and Ukraine, on the earth by the scuffle, so maybe they won’t get it in space and most importantly they will be launched from the slingshots?

[brasist]

probably so

[Militia]

announcing that “states do not yet have an understanding of what should be called weapons in outer space”

As it comes to business, they immediately become dull. Can the General Assembly and Russia put the question to a vote on the exclusion of the dull from the voting list. Maybe concepts will appear right away?

[udincev]

122 states have supported the initiative of the Russian Federation. Is it time for the Russian Foreign Ministry to make a statement that the United States and several other states are isolated from the rest of the world community ...

Judging by similar US claims, it's time

[Corsair0304]

Who would doubt it. Of course, great 3,14 Dosia with her mongrels will be against any peace initiative - otherwise how can one remain a world hegemon? Only missiles in geostationary orbit and other measures of general democratization.
Yes, on the other hand - a bolt on them. Mattresses even those contracts that are signed do not comply. And so it will be at least something to rely on.
"The Biological Weapons Convention (BW) is another potential tool for preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The BW Convention, ratified by the United States in 1975, prohibits member states from developing, acquiring or storing biological or toxic substances if they do not required for self-defense or for some peaceful purpose, and the US biological defense program appears to be in excess of the Convention's level. As part of its biological defense program, the US secretly designed a model bio-bomb and produced an anthrax virus suitable for military purposes It can be argued that although the declared objectives are defense, these actions violate the BW Convention, since the Convention prohibits the production of weapons These and other biological defense measures were carried out in secret, and, therefore, the US partners under this treaty could not assess them for match the latter. "

[LVMI1980]

This picture is taken from the 80s book "Where the Threat to Peace Comes From"
true facts if taken to the letter

[Abakan]

Isn't it time for the Russian Foreign Ministry to make a statement that the USA and several other states are isolated from the rest of the world community ... not to isolate but to bang them all)) a joke of course, but such thoughts have recently come to me

[Wedmak]

If all countries accept this rule as law, but the USA, Ukraine and Georgia do not accept, then what will we do? Okay, Ukraine and Georgia, the first one collapsed its path into space, the second one didn’t have it. But what if the United States launches some sort of armed device? What actions will be on our part?
Another question is what is armed. Current technology allows you to bring anything you want, from cannons against satellites to warheads with thermonuclear filling. I am generally silent about lasers, as if the ideal option.
And the chances that the US will voluntarily limit its deployment of armaments are nil.

[victorsh]

With the exception of the Yankees, the rest of the countries are GREAT SPACE HOLDERS. They probably launch their spaceships a few pieces a year. One word is CRAFTS !!!

[arane]

Quote: Wedmak

If all countries accept this rule as law, but the USA, Ukraine and Georgia do not accept, then what will we do? Okay, Ukraine and Georgia, the first one collapsed its path into space, the second one didn’t have it. But what if the United States launches some sort of armed device? What actions will be on our part?
Another question is what is armed. Current technology allows you to bring anything you want, from cannons against satellites to warheads with thermonuclear filling. I am generally silent about lasers, as if the ideal option.
And the chances that the US will voluntarily limit its deployment of armaments are nil.

How to do what? Militarize the cosmos! We wanted a peaceful space, they refused! Basically, I think this initiative was intended to show who is who, no more. Our well-known that the Americans will talk!

[russmensch]

the draft resolution clearly states that we are talking about any types of weapons based in space.

And Americans out of habit (??) change the mind and believe that:

Initiative implies only weapons that are based in space and do not talk about ground-based anti-satellite weapons, which can aggravate, and not reduce, distrust and possible miscalculations.

Does nobody understand anything, or is everyone crazy?

[VseDoFeNi]

in the so-called First Committee of the UN General Assembly, announcing that "states do not yet have an understanding of what should be called weapons in outer space."

These, gentlemen clowns, are not boxes in the AK-74 and M-16. All of you perfectly understand.
But anti-satellite missiles to destroy the GPS constellation, in case we need to stock up.

[ML-334]

Okay, the Jews are asking for money from the United States for armament, and why the hell is it coming from?

[zadorin1974]

According to the agreement, the Americans must provide information to Russia about the cargo (satellites) launched into orbit with the help of our engines (it is forbidden to use Russian engines for military purposes). This raises the question: they stopped cooperating with Yuzhmash (and the plant has already been ditched, with us will not give a ride, their developments are only in the distant future, they again want to milk the loot on the F-35 from the Congress, and fly into space on a trampoline?

[veksha50]

"Speech about Ukraine and Georgiaopposed to the draft resolution "...

Mdaaaa ... Two great cosmic powers - against ...

But in general, the US resistance only confirms my long-standing conjecture that their aggressive plans for space have long received great attention ...

And all these treaties, as we can see, are concluded mainly so that one of the parties "threw" the other ... Even if the United States signs this treaty, it will give absolutely no guarantee that they will fulfill this treaty .. ...

[am808s]

It’s just that the mattresses are already dreaming of space revenge. They are already preparing weapons and we will give them engines and then they will hang over the whole planet blackmailing everyone with their terrible space weapons. - A ton of nails to meet you!

[roskot]

There are few wars on earth, give space. Fly on our engines and crap around the world. And in the allies are two space powers - Ukraine and Georgia.

[rotmistr60]

It is noteworthy that Israel voted against

There is nothing remarkable here. A clear principle "You are for me, I am for you." And the guys, under the white and blue flag, on the site constantly prove that they are independent, do not depend on anyone and can pile on anyone they want. The second landmark vote at the UN in a week and the result is the same with the same countries.

[tolmachiev51]

Nothing new !!! Whatever Russia does or suggests, "everything is wrong or bad." Well, Georgia and dill are super space powers.

[Stas157]

I suppose that we have serious achievements in terms of space weapons (among Americans too). So, in order to get ahead of the Americans and legally begin practical implementation, Russia took the initiative to ban space weapons (like this in Putin's style)! It is logical to assume that the United States, of course, will not abandon its development, which in general has happened! And now Russia has all the trump cards in its hands! We were the first to prohibit weapons in space, we were refused! Now forward, with a clear conscience! And let only someone pickle, after that, that Russia has militarized the whole cosmos! ... And the Americans will again be foolish))

[givigor71]

without words...

[Petr1]

Any superpower will fall apart sooner or later, the USA will be the same, and the USA will not, and there will be no country like Israel, their Arabs will tear and tear their hands. That’s what they are doing. Well, on the outskirts and in Georgia, the treacherous regimes must also be recognized not eternal.

[Lee_Mubai]

Israel in general has become like the Nazis 2worldly, in full throat with anyway the slightest case yelling about the genocide of the Jews in World War II, and what are they doing now? Palestinians are bombed without knowing who is to blame and who is not !!!!

[Lee_Mubai]

I completely agree with you, only the complete destruction of Osh will give us all peace and prosperity throughout the world !!!!!!

[I doubt it]

What is the point of proposing another agreement if today the agreements have no practical value? Anyone can refuse, withdraw unilaterally, not fulfill or partially fulfill. Accept and not ratify for 20 years, finally. If your opponent is only looking for loopholes in any of your contracts. So why make another one with him? Why bother with him about anything? Will it stop him?
Moreover, they already have groundwork. And not just developments, but devices that are called "in metal" flying. And they will not conclude any agreements with us until something similar, or even better, superior, appears with us.

[Tjeck]

Hmm, certainly space is the first thing that comes to mind at the mention of Georgia ..

[Rokossovsky]

Quote: Bayonet

Quote: hydrox

since our active devices are already hosted near the Amer reconnaissance satellites and at any moment can do with them, like Boch with a turtle ...

Such large remote-controlled hats, which "completely dominate the vicinity ..." and are ready, at the first order, to brush everyone off !!! Passion for games with space wars does not pass in vain! Well, "Boh" to help you!

Dear Alexander! Fat minus you for

Boh

Doesn't paint this person

[GRIG]

As strange as it may seem, but this initiative, in my opinion, is aimed at a fair demonization of the policy of the State Department. Rather, on its documentary confirmation "in front of everyone," in the highest world institution, the UN.
Unwillingness to join peace initiatives, incapacity to negotiate, babbling in "excuses", gross interference in the affairs of sovereign states ... all this should "accumulate and take shape", discussed and condemned.
About the same thing now with Syria. Russia has proposed joining a just cause. What is the answer? Snot, nagging, thimbles, fakes, cynical slander, etc.
“We need to call a spade a spade,” it seems our guarantor said not so long ago.
And you need to do it the world norm.

Well, and the "great space powers" such as Banderia and Georgia, well, any Sherkhan (from Mowgli) always has his own "personal" jackals.

[Rokossovsky]

This initiative, in my opinion, is aimed at a fair demonization of the policy of the State Department. Rather, on its documentary confirmation "in front of everyone," in the highest world institution, the UN.
Unwillingness to join peace initiatives, incapacity to negotiate, babbling in "excuses", gross interference in the affairs of sovereign states

So they can say the same about us!
We are allegedly also invited to participate in the "peace initiatives" - the overthrow of the "bloody dictatorial" Assad regime in Syria! But we are still against the entire "progressive" World community!
Inability to negotiate is from the same song as "peace initiatives", see above. Why, we also indulge in the right of veto, in their opinion, too often!
There is no point in talking about gross interventions in the affairs of sovereign states! Well, we are occupying half of Ukraine for the second year! In small, proud and very sovereign Georgia, we are ugly with 2008! We don’t let Moldovans arrange complete destruction ... reunion of Transnistria! We are terrible savages and aggressors!
So there is nothing to be surprised at. Each has its own truth.

[GRIG]

Quote: Rokossovsky

So they can say the same about us!

They do not "can say", but they say.
And for many years.
And now "they" have to listen to the truth about themselves. The truth with evidence.
The truth showing who is who.

Quote: Rokossovsky

Everyone has their own truth.

"True, always alone." Pharaoh said it.

[fazayek]

And why should the state-leader in the space sector refuse to develop weapons for this environment? They did the right thing, they understand that VPK is driving progress very much. And we do not need to give up weapons in space. I would also understand if all sorts of undeveloped countries would ache, but we, why? What do we want to completely abandon the space industry?

[bad]

[quote] [The American delegation voted against the adoption of the draft resolution in the so-called First Committee of the UN General Assembly, declaring that "states do not yet have an understanding of what should be called weapons in outer space." Apparently, the “American side” does not have “understanding”, as the draft resolution clearly indicates that we are talking about any types of weapons based in space. / Quote] ...- in the end, if it comes to weapons in space it will be worse for them .. then the first will complain that it is necessary to sign some kind of agreement on some kind of restriction ... because while they think, we are doing ... that's the whole story ..

[Old26]

Article (more precisely, note) - MINUS. Note NOTHING. What kind of resolution, what types of weapons, when passed - nothing. And to conclude from nothing is stupid.

Quote: sabakina

Our combat station "Almaz" seems to be in conservation ...

In the museum? Yes. In reality, no, for a very long time

Quote: veksha50

And whether Sarmat will be able to replace it by power - so it is unlikely ...

He won’t even stand close.

Quote: Bayonet

Another reaction from the idiots and did not expect

Spit. Correctly said - minus - do not think

Quote: Militia

As it comes to business, they immediately become dull. Can the General Assembly and Russia put the question to a vote on the exclusion of the dull from the voting list. Maybe concepts will appear right away?

And the question, by the way, is posed by the Americans correctly.

• What are weapons in space?
• Anti-satellite system - weapons or not?
• And relatively speaking, the explosive charge to eliminate, if necessary, a satellite - is it a weapon or not?
• Why will a satellite interceptor in orbit be considered a weapon, and there isn’t exactly the same on the launch pad in hourly readiness?
• Laser in orbit - weapon or not?
• Are a cannon or space-to-space rockets a weapon?
• Is a ground-based anti-satellite interceptor missile a weapon?

We must really first decide what to consider weapons and what not, and then negotiate. Judging by the quantity, all African countries, Asian countries and the majority of those who never launched themselves voted for our proposal.