The Pentagon: the probability of a collision in Syria, the pilots of the Russian Federation and the United States is small

23
The US military does not seek incidents with Russians in Syria, their probability is unlikely, since aviation two countries operates in different regions of the republic, transfers RIA News Pentagon spokesperson Jeff Davis statement.



“We do not seek any incidents with the Russians, and they are with us too,” said Davis.

"In general, we meet little, because we operate in different areas," he told reporters.

At the same time, “the US military, like any military, has the right to self-defense, but in this case we do not expect to have to use it,” added Davis.

He recalled that earlier the parties "concluded a memorandum of understanding on the actions in the skies of Syria."
  • RF Ministry of Defense / ria.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    5 November 2015 09: 04
    And God forbid they meet with our aircraft!
    1. +12
      5 November 2015 09: 07
      Quote: prabiz
      And God forbid they meet with our aircraft!

      We also have the right to self-defense and we can use it.
      1. +8
        5 November 2015 09: 13
        Quote: vovanpain

        We also have the right to self-defense and we can use it.

        There is a right to self-defense, but it must be applied asymmetrically.
        There was a lot of talk about the S-300 in Syria. If this were true, then in principle it would be guaranteed to cover the entire airspace over Syria.

        We, unlike the United States, have one significant plus.
        We are legally located in Syria. We may not even transfer the complex to Assad, but it’s quite reasonable to place the videoconferencing during the operation.
        1. +3
          5 November 2015 09: 15
          the US military, like any military, has the right to self-defense, but in this case we do not expect that it will have to be applied

          But in this case, the amars are the aggressor.
          What kind of defense does this representative mumble about ???
          Being an aggressor, there is a high probability of getting a wort.
          Syrians can break it. No one called Amerov to Syria.
          Mistress at home and then you can talk about defense.
        2. +7
          5 November 2015 09: 22
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Quote: vovanpain

          We also have the right to self-defense and we can use it.

          There is a right to self-defense, but it must be applied asymmetrically.
          There was a lot of talk about the S-300 in Syria. If this were true, then in principle it would be guaranteed to cover the entire airspace over Syria.

          It would be just great!
          1. +1
            5 November 2015 09: 26
            The Pentagon: the probability of a collision in Syria, the pilots of the Russian Federation and the United States is small

            Our pilots have no time to be distracted by trifles - they WORK!
        3. +2
          5 November 2015 10: 09
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          There was a lot of talk about the S-300 in Syria. If this were true, then in principle it would be guaranteed to cover the entire airspace over Syria.

          Now in the headlines of news agencies)))) you / we were heard))
          09:29
          Russia supplies anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria
          Russia has supplied anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria to prevent possible hijackings of aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) and retaliatory strikes, said the commander of the Russian VKS Viktor Bondarev.

          In general, one way or another, our air defense was brought there .. then, it seems to me, there should be "outlined" a circle forbidden for aircraft of other countries, the so-called "red line". ))) I wonder ... where it will go))
  2. +3
    5 November 2015 09: 07
    "... We are not looking for any incidents with the Russians ..."
    Information about the transfer of F-15s with air-to-air missiles to Turkey has passed. What for?!
  3. +3
    5 November 2015 09: 08
    "the right to self-defense" in the airspace of a foreign country, in a DIFFERENT hemisphere! modestly.
  4. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 09
    The US military does not seek incidents with Russians in Syria, their probability is unlikely, since the aircraft of the two countries operate in different areas of the republic


    And on what basis do American aviation operate in SYRIA ... it is illegal there and they need to poke it in the nose like ISRAEL periodically bombing dubious targets in SYRIA ... hypocrites.
  5. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 11
    Of course, it is better to avoid any incidents. However, I think that ours will not be particularly ceremonial violators or other buzoters. An example of this is two Turkish fighters, which Sushka kept on sight for a long time. So I understand that this subtle hint was correctly understood.
  6. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 12
    I hope that our Syrians have already taught Syrians how to use the S-300 complexes. When you fly and these complexes graze you from the ground, the desire to enter the affected area disappears immediately!
  7. +1
    5 November 2015 09: 13
    The situation is just class! - in some areas, these mu ... d ..- ahem the coalition drops its weapons, and smiles smartly at the sand in the desert. In other areas, our aircraft are really fighting terrorists.
  8. +2
    5 November 2015 09: 14
    Quote: Decathlon
    "... We are not looking for any incidents with the Russians ..."
    Information about the transfer of F-15s with air-to-air missiles to Turkey has passed. What for?!



    And just in case ... most likely against Syrian aviation or for provocation.
  9. +1
    5 November 2015 09: 17
    I think that American pilots are sane guys (in contrast to their leadership in general and the president in particular) and will not arrange a brawl in the sky. For ours, I'm generally calm.
  10. -1
    5 November 2015 09: 17
    “The US military, like any military, has the right to self-defense, but in this case we do not expect that it will have to be applied,” Davis added.

    ... scared already.
    Behind yourself, so that they will be thrown into the window in time. laughing
  11. -1
    5 November 2015 09: 23
    Yes, they are afraid of ours as a devil. It's only in the movies they are dashing guys.
  12. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 30
    Moreover, “the US military, like any military, has the right to self-defense

    Only escape can be saved.
  13. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 32
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    The US military does not seek incidents with Russians in Syria, their probability is unlikely, since the aircraft of the two countries operate in different areas of the republic
    What will happen in the future, when the Syrian army has to liberate those areas where the Americans fly or at that time there will be "moderate" ISIS forces. lol
  14. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 32
    I hope the Americans left a desert zone behind them. There they bomb
    handy.
  15. 0
    5 November 2015 09: 41
    Russia has supplied anti-aircraft missile systems (SAMs) to Syria to prevent possible hijackings of Russian aerospace forces and retaliatory strikes, said Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air and Space Forces Viktor Bondarev.

    “We have calculated all possible threats. We put there not only fighters, attack aircraft, bombers, helicopters, but also anti-aircraft missile systems. Because there can be various kinds of force majeure circumstances. Let's say hijacking a combat aircraft on the territory of a state adjacent to Syria and attacking us. And we must be ready for this, ”he said in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper.

    Is everything clear to everyone?
  16. 0
    5 November 2015 10: 20
    "Pentagon: the likelihood of a collision in Syria between Russian and US pilots is small": no higher than a meeting of a bandit and a law-abiding citizen in our states.
  17. 0
    5 November 2015 11: 23
    there is a right to self-defense

    As he turned in time about the right to self-defense - seemingly by chance, just in case. That's just this mutual right.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"