The US is trying to find the answer to strengthen the Russian Navy

The US is trying to find the answer to strengthen the Russian NavyChief of Staff of the US Navy, complaining of the high activity of Russian warships, explained that the possibility of sending more US warships closer to Russia - in Europe. Do Americans have the opportunity to return to a degree of presence in the Mediterranean, comparable to the Cold War?


The US, against the background of high activity of Russian warships and submarines in the Black and Mediterranean seas, as well as in the Pacific Ocean, was thinking about sending more ships to Europe and increasing the potential of the navy in Europe, said the head of the US Navy headquarters, John Richardson. He noted that "similar activity of ships and submarines (Russia - approx. LOOK) was not observed for at least 20 years", in connection with which the United States is forced to reconsider its position of global leadership in the world, quoted the Financial Times head of the US Navy.

Richardson stressed that “right now we are discussing the question”: should we increase our presence in Europe and the Pacific to “maintain the necessary balance of power and how to distribute our forces so that we can firmly be sure that we maintain this balance” .
According to the head of the US Navy headquarters, US officials, in particular, find the monitoring of the most important telecommunications cables on the seabed by Russian submarines "extremely alarming": "This could be a threat to any other global system, the information system associated with prosperity, associated with security, ”said Richardson.

Russia's activity in the Pacific really grew, in particular the head of the naval fleet Russia's Viktor Chirkov recently said that since 2013, the intensity of Russian underwater patrols has increased by 50%, FT recalled.

Russia, Richardson believes, is trying to increase the presence of its navy in the oceans in order to establish itself as a “serious player” on the world stage, and for a long-term perspective. For example, she recently demonstrated the quality of her Navy by launching cruise missiles from the ships of the Caspian flotilla against the targets of the Islamic State terrorist group in Syria, banned in Russia, the US Navy head said: “These are significant opportunities, a serious demonstration comment LOOK) ", - he said.

“The controversial motives of Russia and China are disturbing”


Richardson also added that the increased Russian activity falls on the period “when the US conducts an operation in the South China Sea to counter the assertive actions of China, which also expands its navy and builds five artificial islands. China threatens freedom of navigation in waters where one of the main trade routes runs - it accounts for 30% of world trade, ”the head of the US Navy said.

Thus, “Russian and Chinese activity, ambiguous motives of these two countries raise concerns for the state of the global system, which ensures equal access for all, free shipping and trade”. “It is particularly disturbing if this model is now under threat?” Richardson wondered.

However, he pointed out that there are also positive examples of naval cooperation with Russia and China, through which, in particular, none of the commercial vessel has been hijacked by pirates in the Gulf of Aden. China has played an important role in patrolling these waters off the east coast of Africa. However, according to the South China Sea between the two countries with the position of the United States is clearly diverge sure Richardson. He recalled that the United States hold the key and the Senkaku Islands (which China also contests, but Japan).

However, on October 19, the New York Times reported that the command of the US Army does not have enough equipment and financial means for the prompt delivery of heavy military equipment to Europe. Although earlier, in June, the same newspaper, citing American officials, noted that the Pentagon is considering deploying heavy weapons in Eastern Europe as an alleged response to "possible Russian aggression" in the region. It was reported that the United States could place at the bases of its European NATO allies Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and other types of heavy weapons.

“Trying to show that they are still strong”


Chairman of the All-Russian Fleet Support Movement Mikhail Nenashev, in an interview with the newspaper LOOK noted that the intention of the US to increase its presence in the Black Sea and the Mediterranean linked to the global geopolitical processes.

“The United States feels that they are falling out of the global agenda. As before, everything that is being done in the world, mainly negative and destructive processes, is being done according to the US scenario. But the key word here is for now. They create different arc of tension and geopolitical conflicts. It seems to them that in this way they successfully manage the international “hassle”, said Nenashev.
The interviewee is confident that the US plans to strengthen its position in the European seas are associated with a set of geopolitical events. The intention to strengthen in the European seas is associated with an attempt to show that the US can still do something, nothing more. “We are resolutely repulsing the international terrorist international, we are strengthening our strategic relations with India and China. Naturally, the United States feels uncomfortable in such conditions. They drop out of the global agenda, and India, China and Russia intercept the leadership, ”noted Mikhail Nenashev.

In all likelihood, the source said, the United States will soon act more aggressively. “Many of Washington’s actions look, frankly, funny. Then they will deploy a company in Poland, then a platoon in Estonia. The US Navy is undoubtedly the basis of their “long hands,” but the 21st century is the age of the decline of US influence in the world, ”the expert concluded.

Dear idea

“It is possible to increase the number of permanent operational connections in these regions,” said Vladimir Murakhovsky, a military expert, chief editor of the Arsenal of the Fatherland magazine, in his commentary on the VIEW of the View.

“It is now known that four destroyers with the AEGIS antimissile system are on a permanent basis in Spain. There is also an almost permanent union of European NATO countries in the Mediterranean. True, they say that it is intended to regulate the flow of refugees across the sea to Italy. Nevertheless, this is a combat operational connection, ”the expert noted.
Compared with the period of the Cold War, the US military presence in the Mediterranean Sea has decreased significantly, explains Murakhovsky. “Let me remind you that in those years there was an 6 fleet deployed on a permanent basis, which included at least one aircraft carrier strike group. Then the strategy, including naval, in the United States has changed. They in their national military doctrine, which was adopted last year, say that the main efforts are shifted to the Asia-Pacific region. And it can be seen in the composition of the American grouping there - the 7 of the American fleet, including aircraft carriers, is constantly present there, ”the source notes.

Return to the former scale of their forces in the Mediterranean, Americans will not be able to purely for financial reasons. “Considering that the US military budget in real terms is shrinking for the next year, I do not think that they will go to such large additional expenses. If additional ships are deployed in the Mediterranean, this is of no strategic importance. Rather, the operational and tactical value ", - said Murakhovsky.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Armored optimist 4 November 2015 06: 15 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    American ships in Europe will be within range of Warsaw. It would be necessary to scrape off a dozen decibels from them and begin to plan with a large series.
    1. science fiction writer 4 November 2015 06: 32 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      “There has been no such activity on ships and submarines for at least 20 years,” said John Richardson, chief of staff of the US Navy

      That John is sycotic laughing
    2. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 06: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: armored optimist
      American ships in Europe will be within range of Warsaw.

      You can play in Ladushki - Ladushki, Ladushki, where were you ???
    3. NEXUS 4 November 2015 09: 51 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: armored optimist
      American ships in Europe will be within range of Warsaw.

      Let's just say that it’s not Varshavyanok, but Calibrov as a whole (both the Caliber of the NK and the PL). It would be very interesting if we had a strike force with ekranoplanes of the Lun type in the Russian Sea and not only in it.
      Quote: armored optimist
      It would be necessary to scrape off a dozen decibels from them and begin to plan with a large series.

      Varshavyanka is already one of the quietest and most invisible submarines in the world. And as for the series ... yes, there would be more of these “Black Holes” for the headache of the NATO admirals.
      But it would be very good to bring Lada to mind, then, as you say, the decibel of the new submarine will be smaller. hi
    4. ver_ 5 November 2015 07: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      ... missed Pearl Harber however, history doesn’t teach anything .. someone ...
  2. rotmistr60 4 November 2015 06: 29 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If the Americans are so fussed, it means they really feel that their hegemony (including on the seas and oceans) may come in a paragraph. And these American lamentations cannot be attributed only to an attempt to increase the military budget. The demonstration of the Russian flag pisses us off, which means it pushes for ill-conceived actions that we can take advantage of.
    1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 06: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      a paragraph may come.

      He not only can, he comes. This is already a given.
  3. dvg79 4 November 2015 06: 42 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Be that as it may, their fleet continues to be the strongest, although the rapid growth of the Chinese Navy forces them to divert more and more forces. Unfortunately, there are no ships comparable to the new Berks or Zamvolts, and so far no one can expect them. But boats alone are not enough.
    1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 06: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: dvg79
      Alas, we have no ships comparable with the new Berks or Zamvolty, and so far we will not expect

      We have no such debts and are not expected.

      1. Armored optimist 4 November 2015 08: 01 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        Yes, the types you mentioned were not so good. There is serious criticism.
        1. dvg79 4 November 2015 08: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          But we don’t have such.
          1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 08: 40 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: dvg79
            But we don’t have such.

            But you must?
            And then, something tells me that this is not the United States that was dismembered in 1991.
      2. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 12: 53 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: VseDoFeNi
        We have no such debts and are not expected.

        Do you think the states are going to give them away? --Oh well...
        Look, the default Dill and then 3 Lard tries to pinch us ... and the IMF is ready * to wave * * (prostitute, currency!)
        1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 13: 47 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: BoA KAA
          Do you think the states are going to give them away?

          It does not matter. Debt must be serviced. And it's getting harder to do.
          In addition, interest on the loan reduces your purchasing power, which is bad.

          Quote: BoA KAA
          There, the default Dill and then 3 Lard tries to pin us.

          These are not them, but those who, with the hands of the Georgians, started a war with us in 2008.

          Quote: BoA KAA
          IMF is ready * to wave * * (prostitute, currency!)

          The IMF is an Anglo-Saxon tool for robbing other countries.



          But in general, from what fright did you take that it would go on forever? smile
        2. sharp-lad 4 November 2015 23: 35 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          They also will not be able to give away at all, again no one will lend.
    2. yuriy55 4 November 2015 07: 16 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      ... But boats alone are not enough ...

      That's for sure...
      1. dvg79 4 November 2015 08: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Here the size is not the main thing.
    3. shinobi 4 November 2015 11: 27 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It depends on what actions. For battles in the style of the First World War, it’s not enough. As for the Second World War, 50/50 is enough in general. For nuclear conflict, 13 submarines are enough and I will notice not very large ones. One for each AUG.
      1. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 13: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: shinobi
        For nuclear conflict, 13 submarines are enough and I will notice not very large ones. One for each AUG.

        Listen! Politically, you say, do you understand ... yes!
        Strange you * nuclear conflict * turns out ... You want to get off only with general forces
        And SSBNs and rpkSNy smoke peacefully aside? so what? About VKS, SAK and YES - generally keep quiet ...
        If such a booze goes, then here until the last cucumber they will be measured in pipettes! What 13 submarines can we talk about if the trigger is already pulled?
        So, dear, when you write - thinking is not forbidden! However.
        1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 14: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: BoA KAA
          So, dear, when you write - thinking is not forbidden! However.

          That's right. Look and think. You don’t look at what your opponents are posting.



          And do not forget that Russia has the second fleet in the world.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. sharp-lad 4 November 2015 23: 31 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          In fact, the United States developed the concept of limited nuclear strike.
    4. Xsanchez 4 November 2015 11: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And no Zamolty are needed, the most invisible in the world is the trading coastal fleet! What difference does it make where to install the Gauges.
  4. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 06: 52 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Soon, another Orlan will be part of our fleet. And the USA has no money, there are only debts and enchanting cuts of budgets !!! yes
    1. dvg79 4 November 2015 07: 59 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Owners of the printing press do not have money? laughing ??Are you seriously?
      1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 08: 46 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: dvg79
        Are you seriously?

        More than.
        You, like so many people, consider consumption exclusively, not paying attention to other things. Meanwhile, real wages in the United States slid to the level of 1958. And this is with accumulated debts and completely absent savings. fool


        Red krivulka, this is the REAL value of salaries, and blue, this is, like Pechkin's about a mustache - "and you can fake a mustache."
        1. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 14: 31 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: VseDoFeNi
          You, like so many people, consider consumption exclusively, not paying attention to other things.

          Very true thought! Let's look at other things ... Well, for example, on the GDP (not Putin, but the gross domestic product! This is the value expression of the year produced in the country) ...
          UN List: In $ billion for 2013:
          1. USA 16768 / 9. Russia 2097
          2. PRC 9181
          3. Japan 4899
          4. Germany 3730
          5. France 2806
          6. Great Britain 2678
          7. Brazil 2244
          8. Italy 2149
          9 Russia 2097
          10.India 1938
          11.Canada 1839
          According to the IMF (this is where world money is counted) Russia in 2014. already occupied 10th place (10. Russia - 1857). Data for 2015 is not yet available, but the forecast is not happy.
          So, you need to remain realistic and understand that 1 and 10 of the world economy are two big differences, as they said in Odessa.
          Therefore, the Yankees will now trample the 2nd economy of the world, that is, China. Until he grew up militarily, well, at least to the Russian Federation. If this happens, Amer is kirdyk, with all the ensuing consequences.
          And they will spread rot us economically, because by military means will not work. Russia today is the only country in the world capable of destroying the States. And they are well aware of this.
          1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 15: 54 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Well, for example, on GDP

            There is a good word - BUBBLE. So, the so-called US GDP, is BUBBLE.
            When I read textbooks on macroeconomics, I recall the course of lectures on psychiatry that I listened to in my youth as a student at the medical institute. Most often, I recall the classic type of disturbance in mental activity called "paralogical thinking." This is such a way of reasoning as in the well-known joke: "the box is square, it means it is round. Once round, it means orange. Well, if it is orange, then it is an orange!"

            Do not believe? Then I will give you a well-known life situation: in one country, for example, a million cubes of industrial wood were produced, a million tons of cast iron were cast and a billion cans of pork stew and condensed milk were rolled up in case of starvation. Suppose all this costs a trillion dollars and makes up the gross national product. After a couple of decades, the GNP of this country increased fivefold. And exactly, four trillion erotic massages, manicures, pedicures, hair styling and make-ups were done, and another trillion visitors were served in strip bars and topless cafes. Cast iron, condensed milk and stew were imported from abroad in wooden crates, which were used instead of wood, which they did not chop or saw themselves. Paid as usual in dollars. They printed a lot of dollars, so that was enough for everyone.


            Quote: BoA KAA
            So, you need to remain realistic and understand that 1 and 10 of the world economy are two big differences, as they said in Odessa.

            I can assure you that the productive sectors of Russia and the United States are approximately comparable to the population and are approximately expressed by the ratio 330/146.

            Quote: BoA KAA
            If that happens

            Will not happen.

            Quote: BoA KAA
            And they will spread rot us economically

            The cobweed will dry out. Russia is getting stronger, the United States is catching up with its accomplice from the EU.
          2. Days 4 November 2015 21: 10 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Well, for example, on GDP

            Measuring without PPP is a thankless task. So China devalued its currency at once by 5%, China's GDP in USD fell by 5%. And the “real GDP” as it was - remained the same, and also received a bonus because of a more favorable rate for its exports.

            And PPP GDP is closest to some “real GDP”. In PPP, China is in first place, and Russia in fifth (for 2014 according to the World Bank list).
          3. sharp-lad 4 November 2015 23: 14 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            How is the appearance of GDP growth created? Very simple! Once it was like this: they produced a million units of goods for 100 units of money, multiplied and received a GDP of 100 million. Now: resold several billion shares several times and received several trillion GDP! Only one question: If GDP is constantly growing, why is life worse?
      2. sharp-lad 4 November 2015 23: 07 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Due to inflation, the cost of paper for printing money is ahead of the value of the banknotes printed on it! laughing But seriously - even Americans understand that you can’t print unsecured money at the same pace! But they can’t stop. wassat
    2. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 13: 56 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: VseDoFeNi
      Soon, another Orlan will be part of our fleet. And the USA

      It's great! And he’ll probably cut a nut: 10 aircraft carriers,
      22 RKR, 62 EM URO, 2 Fr and the rest on trifles ...
      1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 14: 05 New
        • -5
        • 0
        -5
        Quote: BoA KAA
        It's great! And he’ll probably cut a nut: 10 aircraft carriers,
        22 RKR, 62 EM URO, 2 Fr and the rest on trifles ...

        You never know how many, but one SU-24 was enough for the floor of the team to be debited from the destroyer. KILLING for money is one thing, and DIING for money oh, how I do not want to.
        1. Cat man null 4 November 2015 21: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: VseDoFeNi
          one SU-24 was enough for the floor of the team to be debited from the destroyer

          How many times have they repeated to the world ...

          ... that SU-24 has nothing to do with it request
          1. VseDoFeNi 5 November 2015 06: 36 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            that the SU-24 has nothing to do with it

            It’s not quite smart to diminish the capabilities of the second fleet in the world, don’t you?
            And then, how about dying for money? There is a burning desire to "glue fins"?
            Fleet, say old? Oh well...

  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. yuriy55 4 November 2015 07: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    ... the US feels that they drop out of the world agenda. As before, everything that is being done in the world, mainly negative and destructive processes, is being done according to the US scenario. But the key word here is for now ...
  7. Name 4 November 2015 07: 13 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The Amers of China are chasing in their waters, even the foam near the cheekbone of "Reagan", ours in the Mediterranean do not give rest to mattresses ... You look further Sargass and do not poke, but ... In the place of the joke:
    1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 07: 49 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: name
      Amers Chinese

      Not everything is so simple in their relationship. China's industry is geared towards US consumption. This is a sweet couple and they cannot be without each other.
      1. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 14: 44 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: VseDoFeNi
        China's industry is geared towards US consumption.
        Follow the trends and decisions of the CPC Central Committee!
        A course has been taken to expand domestic consumption.
        Families were allowed to have 2 children.
        Yuan persistently hiding in world reserve currencies.
        China invests in Africa!
        So, * hunfuzy * is far from foolish. They understand that climbers in a bunch depend on each other. Therefore, so that the "partner" in the fall did not drag you into the abyss, it is better to be able to cut the line and go to another line. This is not a sport, this is a business! There was no smell of morality here!
        1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 18: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: BoA KAA
          A course has been taken to expand domestic consumption.

          Resources are not enough on the planet. fool

          Quote: BoA KAA
          Families were allowed to have 2 children.

          Everyone rushed to give birth ...
          Those affected by scientific and technological progress begin to die out.

          Quote: BoA KAA
          Yuan persistently hiding in world reserve currencies.

          It is the subject of speculation.

          Quote: BoA KAA
          China invests in Africa!

          Yes, even in the whole universe. Capitalism ENDS !!! This is objective. But you stubbornly do not want to understand this.



          Quote: BoA KAA
          There was no smell of morality here!

          All biblical civilization is based on this - global slavery.
    2. RU-Officer 4 November 2015 08: 43 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I sympathize with the employees of the State Department - it’s hard to lie from scratch ... belay Or are they all polls - mentally ill paranoid color blind. wassat In the meantime - "shallow, Emelya ..."
      Glad to see Matthew Lee in good health and sober mind. hi
  8. Neophyte 4 November 2015 09: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There was a gunboat policy, then dictates of aircraft carriers, however, a salvo of Caliber-M from the pontoons of a fire pond would prove the worthlessness of the Yankees' gigantic expenditures on weapons.
  9. akudr48 4 November 2015 09: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Another hat-making publication on the topic, cheers, we are breaking, the Swedes are bending ...

    For children ml. of school age or for ordinary staff, it’s all of course, it can be convincing that the American adversary has overstrained, he has no strength, no money, no will, is about to fly off the coils of world history, losing leadership ...

    It’s good to make such arguments on Soloviev’s talk show so that Michael Bohm and Nick Zlobin would fall out of fear (or maybe laughter).

    But how did the well-deserved marshals and generals of divan troops who went through a severe school of service succumb to this frivolous mood, because they already know how the underestimation and neglect of the real forces of the enemy end?
    1. shinobi 4 November 2015 12: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      All the real power of the United States in their Navy. The strength of Russia is traditionally in dry-willed troops. We are a continental power and all that. We can reach all that we need and interestingly on foot. So all this idle talk about who is stronger, a whale or an elephant.
    2. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 15: 14 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: akudr48
      But how did the well-deserved marshals and generals of divan troops who went through a severe school of service succumb to this frivolous mood, because they already know how the underestimation and neglect of the real forces of the enemy end?

      Well then couches!
      And those who, even through the periscope, saw what the Yankees fleet was like, and how the pilots of aircraft carrier aviation behave ... He will not tire of advocating for new ships, aircraft carrier aircraft above them, and the silent shadows of boats in the deep sea.
      And you need to protect the hats: in the North - it’s cold! laughing
      1. VseDoFeNi 5 November 2015 20: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: BoA KAA
        And those who, at least at the periscope, saw what the Yankees fleet was


        Here our sailors saw it.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dl_WNdiShs
    3. sharp-lad 4 November 2015 23: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why do you think Russia is developing deterrence and air defense systems? Nobody wants a catastrophic fall in the USA! Just everyone wants to put America in its rightful place, just equal among equals! Although there is a VERY BIG DESIRE to incantate the current US governor.
  10. Neophyte 4 November 2015 10: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Nevertheless, the collapse of US military doctrine is evident!
    1. NEXUS 4 November 2015 10: 18 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Neophyte
      Nevertheless, the collapse of US military doctrine is evident!

      Unfortunately, it’s too early to talk about it. I as a professional (in the past) winked A chess player can say that the game is only at the stage of debut and there is still a lot of water to drain before it ends. Therefore, I think you should not relax and underestimate your opponent. At the moment, move for the adversary, and then we'll see how and what. hi
      1. meriem1 4 November 2015 10: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Neophyte
        Nevertheless, the collapse of US military doctrine is evident!

        Unfortunately, it’s too early to talk about it. I as a professional (in the past) winked A chess player can say that the game is only at the stage of debut and there is still a lot of water to drain before it ends. Therefore, I think you should not relax and underestimate your opponent. At the moment, move for the adversary, and then we'll see how and what. hi


        Only debut principles are not chess
      2. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 14: 02 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        At the moment, the move for the adversary, and then we'll see how and what.

        This is not exactly chess, or rather, not at all chess. Capitalism ends, debts grow. Consumer demand is falling. Growth is not possible on falling demand. And growth is the basis of capitalism, which depends on loans directly.
        And if Russia has the opportunity at import substitution to get off with a slight fright, the USA and the EU do not have such an opportunity. All (a large share) of production was withdrawn in Southeast Asia, and it is impossible to return production back to the WTO. This will result in a wild increase in prices and a decrease in consumption.
    2. Boa kaa 4 November 2015 16: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Neophyte
      Nevertheless, the collapse of US military doctrine is evident!
      So, she was called TATIANA !!!

      My dear, let me ask you what you mean by the phrase "US military doctrine"?
      There is a concept of national security, there are concepts of types of armed forces, there are doctrinal provisions of the military on new types and methods of maintaining a database. So what do you mean?
      A. concept Hybrid wars?
      This implies an undeclared, covert military operation in which a belligerent attacks state structures or a regular enemy army with the help of local rebels and separatists, supported by weapons and finances.
      Therefore, the states propose to combine the efforts of governments, armies and intelligence under the auspices of the United States in the framework of a "comprehensive interagency, intergovernmental and international strategy" and make the most effective use of the methods of "political, economic, military and psychological pressure" on the victim of aggression.
      B. For the US Armed Forces, the main enemy is Russia.
      Chuck Hagel, speaking at the annual meeting of the Army Association in mid-October 2014, said: “The requirements for the army (USA) will become more diverse and complex ... But we must deal with revisionist Russia, with its modern and efficient army” .
      "We must, using our capabilities, ensure military and technological superiority, and on this basis, the readiness of the armed forces to outstrip not only actions, but also the plans of any potential enemy."
      The main task is for the United States to be able to "continue to maintain its ability to deploy the power of the American armed forces anywhere in the world, to carry out the operational deployment of troops supporting their aircraft, naval groups across the oceans and continents.
      C. In the recently published US Army Operational Concept "Victory in a complex world. 2020-2040", says that the United States is going to continue to adhere to the National Security Concept-2006 or the so-called Preemptive Strategies. It provides for an achievement in relation not only to today's, but also potential opponents of the United States three goals:
      -men of the regime,
      -the change (construction) of a new nation or nation and its mentality; -creation of a new state.

      D. As far as I know, the concept of the Navy has not changed "From the sea against the coast" ...

      So where is the rejection of previous views, where is the collapse of the "military doctrine" of the amers?
      The fact that the Russian Federation and Iran rested in Syria, defending their national interests, did not greatly change the views of the Yankees on the methods and methods of waging a future war. From the "hybrid" they also did not seem to refuse ..
      So what is the CRASH? (Where is the money, Zin !?) request
  11. meriem1 4 November 2015 10: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It’s necessary to blast this cable stupidly! Let who understand. No cable, no questions.
  12. beer-youk 4 November 2015 12: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Geographically, Europe is washed by "inland seas". For AUG, the Mediterranean and North Seas are mousetraps ready to slam at any moment, not to mention the Black and Baltic. It is unlikely that US admirals in their right mind will climb there, realizing that in the case of Ch, they (the seas) will turn into lakes. And destroyers, of course, are a threat, but not so serious.
    1. theodore rasp 4 November 2015 22: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The First World War eliminated the battleships, the Second - battleships, it seems that the cold will bury the aircraft carriers and the "mosquito" fleet will come to the fore.
  13. shinobi 4 November 2015 12: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We have such a developed Clab sharpened by the firing of Caliber. In Syria, NATO and the United States in particular have openly hinted that their power is quite relative. It’s impossible to track the Clabs in transit container shipments. This is what we know. And what we don’t know?
  14. chunga-changa 4 November 2015 12: 52 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    In the Mediterranean Sea, Russia simultaneously (but not constantly) has one large surface ship, and now it is possible (but most likely not) to have one submarine. Plus a certain amount (two to three) of boats or TFR. The Americans are shocked at what to do now, the fleets of Spain, France, Italy, Turkey, Israel will certainly not be able to cope with this power, and four American destroyers in Spain will not help. These are tales for stupid Americans, the goal is to give money to the sixth fleet, otherwise terrible Russians will come. This is not even funny, the ratio of forces is 40-60: 1, without America, the collapse is damn. The thoughtless hooray-patriotic frenzy on VO already somehow began to bother.
    1. VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 19: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: chunga-changa
      Of course, this power will not be dealt with and four American destroyers in Spain will not help.

      They won’t do it. We'll have to cope with all the arms of Russia. Do they need it? fool
  15. 31rus 4 November 2015 13: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I agree with the opinion, the propaganda article, taking into account the numerical and qualitative composition of the US Navy, and even land bases in Europe, just does not objectively assess the capabilities of the US Navy, it’s better to consider your own group, which it was difficult to create
  16. NordUral 4 November 2015 14: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    He noted that “such activity of ships and submarines (Russia - approx. VIEW) has not been observed for at least 20 years,” in connection with which the US is forced to revise its position of global leadership in the world, quoted the head of the US Navy headquarters The Financial Times.
    Or maybe you should start with the manic idea of ​​global leadership and just live with good neighbors and partners with the whole world, including us. Think do not meddle in your soul and do not besiege your borders. AND?
  17. Vlad5307 4 November 2015 22: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: BoA KAA
    And they will spread rot us economically, because by military means will not work. Russia today is the only country in the world capable of destroying the States. And they are well aware of this.

    Then I am in favor of their sanctions lasting at least 20 years, maybe during this time our government will finally learn not only to trade in raw materials and semi-finished metal, but also finished goods, high-quality products based on the development of industrial production! Long live American imperialism, which makes our government work! laughing
  18. Orionvit 5 November 2015 22: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "According to the IMF (this is where world money is counted)."
    The IMF has its own office. What they want, they think.