A new system for launching conversion Satan missiles will be created in 2017

The newest launch system into space of conversion rockets "Satan" will be created in 2017 g, preliminary tests have already been passed, passes RIA News report of the Deputy General Director of the United Instrument Making Corporation (DIC) Sergey Sokolov.




Works are carried out under the conversion program "Dnepr", the customer - the company "Kosmotras".

“Now we are creating the next generation of a system that is unified and can serve to launch not only PC-20B into space, but also other types of missiles that are being decommissioned. The new equipment for the launch site has already passed preliminary tests, it is planned to finish the works by 2017, ”said the deputy head.

The system consists of 2-x parts placed on the launch pad and at the command post.

“The equipment carries out a remote check from the command point of the functioning of systems, rocket equipment, as well as equipment located at the starting position, with the subsequent transfer of the command to the launch,” said Soklov.

“Over the years of the existence of conversion programs, a great deal of experience has been accumulated on the utilization of ICBMs by the launch method with simultaneous removal of more than 100 payloads into orbit. Successful launches of spacecraft help to maintain the leading position and image of Russia as a reliable partner in the launch services market, allow us to solve launch missile tasks using extra-budgetary funding, ”the agency told the corporation.

An example of successful implementation of programs is the use of a heavy Voevod rocket (NATO SS-18 Satan classification) and a Rokot light rocket based on a PC-18 being decommissioned for launching satellites into orbit.
Photos used:
http://interpolit.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sever.56 3 November 2015 16: 27 New
    • 27
    • 0
    +27
    All is correct. Do not cut the same thing as with the traitor “hunchback” and “lover of the hot” EBN that can be used as part of the space program. Saving money will be tangible.
    1. Baikonur 3 November 2015 16: 36 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      And not only savings, but also considerable benefits can be drawn!
      1. sever.56 3 November 2015 16: 46 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        But is saving money that can be spent on the development and production of new missiles not a direct benefit?
        1. Drmadfisher 3 November 2015 19: 12 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          cost savings - indirect income
          1. krot 3 November 2015 20: 46 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I hope and grandmas in the budget !!?
      2. 79807420129 3 November 2015 16: 58 New
        • 15
        • 0
        +15
        They served at the time and served in good faith, the minke whales were afraid of Satan like hell, it was not for nothing that the Alconaut with tagged sawed them with tripled energy, and here again they will serve the country and the savings and benefits of a commercial launch.
        1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 3 November 2015 18: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And fear at the same time catch up with our "partners" in space! By the way, they still do not have their own "transport" on the ISS!
        2. morozik 3 November 2015 23: 48 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          we have the VOEVODE! Satan is a Western name, in order to frighten a geyrop, they say that Christians from Russia in the form of Satan are threatening us Christians ... Journalists are stupid - knowingly or deliberately ... But the Orthodox guys ... Satan is there, we have the VOEVODA !!!
          1. Andrey Skokovsky 4 November 2015 08: 09 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: morozik
            we have the VOEVODE! Satan is a Western name, in order to frighten a geyrop, they say that Christians from Russia in the form of Satan are threatening us Christians ... Journalists are stupid - knowingly or deliberately ... But the Orthodox guys ... Satan is there, we have the VOEVODA !!!

            +5
            also tired of being constantly reminded of these enemy nicknames.
            moreover, what’s important, all the NATO names carry a hidden negative anti-Russian subtext, and God forgive me forgiving them, they’re still repeating them in English, translated into Russian,
            Why didn’t they translate Voivode into English?
            I want to quote Lavrov ....
    2. MIKHAN 3 November 2015 16: 39 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      We have abandoned mines since the 90s, but I think inside everything remained in working condition .. I pass by and always look with sadness and my heart bleeds .. hi
      1. Vita vko 3 November 2015 16: 45 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        It would not be bad to consider the option of disposal with the replacement of nuclear b.ch. on the usual. One such missile can replace at least 20 calibers or half daily flights of the Syrian air force group. Especially when the weather in Syria is not flying.
        1. Alex_Rarog 3 November 2015 20: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I do not agree, it’s like to beat a sparrow cannon, the weight of warhead R36M (Satan) 7300 kg to send such a warhead to Syria is pointless! One head is stupid there are no such goals for even 6 tons of TNT (1300 kg body) but to make a shared warhead is more expensive than calibers, so let them get the satellites out ....
        2. Drёma 3 November 2015 21: 08 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          What's the point? It takes time and a lot of money to "rearm" the Voivode,
          its maintenance, and this is with a very vague prospect of use;
          you need to create new media instead of using
          already finished.
          Are resources better - labor, intellectual, financial = all -
          use for the production of new calibers, missiles for the S-400 / -500, X-101 / -102
          and many, many other "goodies"?
      2. sever.56 3 November 2015 16: 50 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: MIKHAN
        We have abandoned mines since the 90s, but I think everything inside it remained in working condition.


        Hardly if they are not guarded. It was once at a similar point. All that did not have time to plunder - destroyed and flooded with water. hi
        1. Lelek 3 November 2015 17: 39 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: sever.56
          . All that did not have time to plunder - destroyed and flooded with water.


          And what can you expect in a mine 37 meters deep in the absence of daily drainage (suction). It is good if the central bunker is in good condition and the equipment and cables can be replaced.
        2. Vladimir 23rus 4 November 2015 10: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          destroyed and flooded with water
          Most are flooded with concrete!
      3. gispanec 3 November 2015 17: 22 New
        • -7
        • 0
        -7
        Quote: MIKHAN
        I pass by and always look with sadness and my heart bleeds ..

        better from roads or courtyards, my heart bleeds ... then ... yes a patriot ...
        1. theadenter 3 November 2015 21: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Hope this is sarcasm?
      4. zyablik.olga 4 November 2015 06: 56 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: MIKHAN
        We have mines abandoned since 90-x, but I think everything inside there remained in working condition ..

        Very naive judgment ... no
    3. Finches 3 November 2015 16: 47 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      The right decision, but I still wanted to correct the author - to use our classification of the name weapons - "Voivode", personifying power, generosity, but reminiscent of the immortal immortal: "Who will come to us with a sword ..."! And about the "Satan" - let some Financial Times write, so that the average man quickly bangs his legs, contributing his money to the construction of gas stations in Afghanistan ...! laughing
    4. Sweles 3 November 2015 17: 29 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      A new system for launching conversion Satan missiles will be created in 2017


      There is no such rocket Satan, there is the Governor is our rocket, and not American, damn zhurnalyugi.
      1. Boa kaa 3 November 2015 20: 09 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Sveles
        there is Governor is our rocket, not American
        It's simple: the "elite" is accustomed to squint to the west, hence the "Satan" ...
        But I would like to say something else. All launches of former ICBMs (conversion launches) are carried out by combat calculations of our Strategic Rocket Forces (now VKS). Well, where and when can we get a more “paid” training for our calculations by the launch customer !? Therefore, this is the best way to "recycle" our former ICBMs!
        IMHO.
        1. Vladimir 23rus 4 November 2015 10: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Therefore, this is the best way to "recycle" our former ICBMs!
          Damn well fly! Why shoot working rockets against which even the new vaunted ABM “partners” still can’t do anything. First you need at least develop(put it on your database in your dreams) a new heavy carrier, and then "recycle" the old one. Plus, two-thirds of the payload is the satellite of the "partners"! This is almost every launch!
  2. Observer2014 3 November 2015 16: 28 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    I hope without the participation of Ukraine?! And then somehow all these joint business with the "impassable" turn into deeds and a waste of Russian money.
    1. sever.56 3 November 2015 16: 36 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      At Yuzhmash they go to work four times a month.
      Here I recently read the information that at an economic gathering in Italy, an Italian businessman suggested making dog collars at Yuzhmash ... A steep take-off of the enterprise, from strategic missiles to dog collars ... !!!
      1. psg72 3 November 2015 17: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Damn well, how could such an enterprise prosrat.
        1. Observer2014 3 November 2015 17: 43 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Yes, they don’t give a damn about enterprises. They have a dream there. Go to work !!!! They even have “written” writers, this image has been cultivated for centuries. ” Ukraine had immigrants sea from there. North, Far East. BAM. Well, I won’t write about the perestroika Moscow post. Although those who stayed in the north and the Far East honor and praise.
          That’s why the Maidan turned out. "To empty Europe without visas they promised" But "fools." Ha ha ha
        2. Drmadfisher 3 November 2015 19: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          and it’s good that they pissed off - a woman with a cart
  3. Irokez 3 November 2015 16: 29 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    All in business. That's right. Why throw or cut useful metal to metal. It is possible to save, just in case, but if possible, then consider it almost free to put the satellite into orbit.
    1. venaya 3 November 2015 16: 33 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Irokez
      Why throw or cut useful metal to metal. It is possible to save, just in case, but if possible, then consider it almost free to put the satellite into orbit.

      I think for the money received from the commerce, and it is advisable to build newer missiles. So the rotation of weapons and carry out, cheaply and angrily.
  4. NEXUS 3 November 2015 16: 32 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The economy should be economical. The Sarmatians will come to replace the Voivode and utilization is a very acute issue in this matter. And so the Voivode will lastly serve the country for peaceful purposes hi
  5. Vladimir71 3 November 2015 16: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Wouldn’t it be time to withdraw the warheads with their subsequent use in case of aggression? And we are cheaper and worse for them)))
    1. MIKHAN 3 November 2015 16: 42 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Vladimir71
      Wouldn’t it be time to withdraw the warheads with their subsequent use in case of aggression? And we are cheaper and worse for them)))

      It is impossible and dangerous ... May the cosmos be peaceful (relatively) hi
      1. Vladimir 23rus 4 November 2015 10: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        May the cosmos still be peaceful (relatively)
        Yeah! This must be said to be "exceptional", otherwise they may be "forgotten (and) be!"
  6. starec.luka 3 November 2015 16: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Well done rocketers. Rad for our good
  7. zlideny 3 November 2015 16: 43 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Maybe at least something will remain in CLEAR, or else the entire division has already been disarmed without a single shot.
  8. Mareman Vasilich 3 November 2015 16: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Was anything done in exchange for the Governor, or was everything wasted for nothing?
    1. yuriy55 3 November 2015 17: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      But what about! Replaced temporarily with solid fuel:
      http://dokwar.ru/publ/vooruzhenie/pvo_i_rvsn/mezhkontinentalnyj_strategicheskij_

      kompleks_quot_topol_m_quot / 16-1-0-209


      In developing:
      http://www.rg.ru/2015/02/02/raketa-site.html
    2. SIvan 3 November 2015 17: 07 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      The new Sarmat heavy liquid rocket. The tests will begin in a year or two.
      1. NEXUS 3 November 2015 17: 20 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: SIvan
        The new Sarmat heavy liquid rocket. The tests will begin in a year or two.

        The tests of Sarmatia will begin in the year 16, and the Voivode’s service life was extended to 20 years. hi
        1. Eugene-Eugene 3 November 2015 17: 28 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Now it seems that the very old Governors will convert
          1. NEXUS 3 November 2015 17: 32 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            Now it seems that the very old Governors will convert

            Everything rests on the results and progress of the Sarmatian tests. It must be understood that the new ICBM will not be on duty for more than one year. The tests will be very stringent accordingly. Plus, you need to take into account and lay the modernization potential in the new missiles. hi
  9. roskot 3 November 2015 17: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    All is correct. There is nothing to saw on needles. They will still serve the cosmos.
  10. stas 3 November 2015 17: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "Satan" is good, and the latest "American Scribe" would be better and more understandable for pin.osov!
  11. Andrey77 3 November 2015 17: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    But is it worth revising the START-2 treaty? Why should we cut?
    1. NEXUS 3 November 2015 17: 55 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Andrey77
      Why should we cut?

      Because the Governor’s end of life, if my memory serves me, they’ve already extended three times. Besides, although the rocket itself is the best in the world (from liquid-fuel analogs), problems with very caustic fuel do not disappear. Yes and it is necessary to take into account the new realities of today, taking into account the development of new and promising missile defense systems. Therefore, Sarmat is created so that Americans scratch their turnips again and think in which garbage can they throw their missile defense. And this is an asymmetric response to the American missile defense. hi
      1. Andrey77 3 November 2015 18: 48 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        Service life is extended by one or two. Caustic fuel? Did you personally touch him?
        1. NEXUS 3 November 2015 18: 54 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Andrey77
          Service life is extended by one or two.

          Oh, how. And our inventors are sitting, inventing a bicycle. You can extend the Governor’s service life until blue, and you won’t be soared. Wow, it's just that laughingWhy the Sarmatian is needed if everything is done once or twice. fellow laughing

          Quote: Andrey77
          Caustic fuel? Did you personally touch him?

          And you wash your hands in heptyl and then write me your feelings. Or at least breathe in fumes. wassatAnd when you spit out the lungs on the keyboard, typing, I am very interested in whether you add your message or not. hi
          1. Andrey77 3 November 2015 19: 07 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            And I'm at the BZHRK, we have solid fuel systems.
            1. NEXUS 3 November 2015 19: 22 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Andrey77
              And I'm at the BZHRK, we have solid fuel systems.

              Yah laughing Wow, the Barguzins are only going to accept by the year 18, and you are already on them fellow Or BZHRK Well done somewhere dug up and chasing him? wassat
              1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 54 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I’m the last, probably, who was being prepared for “Well done”. The complex is removed, my VUS is not needed yet.
            2. Drmadfisher 3 November 2015 19: 25 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Do not skip off the topic, cardboard fool, the conversation is about the VOEVODE.
              1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 57 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I can’t say anything about the governor. I'm at another complex, which is no longer there.
            3. samoletil18 3 November 2015 23: 09 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Andrey77
              And I'm at the BZHRK, we have solid fuel systems.

              To the special department tomorrow morning?
              1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 14 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Easy. Specialists are normal officers. Read less books about the evil GB-nude.
                1. samoletil18 7 November 2015 11: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Communicated with them in the army. Normal officers do their job. I’m talking about military secrets, and I liked the horror stories about KGB in childhood, they probably composed them to themselves, so that people would not relax.
    2. Boa kaa 3 November 2015 20: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Andrey77
      But is it worth revising the START-2 treaty? Why should we cut?
      Saw, Shura, Saw! They are golden ... (c)
      The OSV-II treaty of 1979 prohibited the launch of nuclear weapons into space and established ceilings for launchers, strategic aviation and missiles (but not nuclear warheads themselves) below the existing level: up to 2500 units (including up to 820 ICBM launchers, equipped with hcp). In addition, the development and deployment of ballistic missiles based on watercraft other than submarines and on the seabed were prohibited; mobile heavy ICBMs; RGM cruise missiles; The maximum throwable weight for SLBMs was limited.
      (Wiki)
      That's all. And then there was START III.
      The agreement was signed on April 8, 2010 in Prague and entered into force on February 5, 2011.
      It is designed for 10 years with a possible extension by mutual agreement of the parties for 5 years. The agreement provides for the reduction of nuclear warheads to 1550 units, ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers - to 700 units. The agreement was replaced by the START-I expired in December 2009.
      (Wiki)
      So, we already live in a different reality in terms of the number of ICBMs and BB.
  12. Djclone 3 November 2015 18: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It seems that Dnipro will no longer fly, so a very useful development
  13. Mama_Cholli 3 November 2015 18: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If at the same time 100 satellites are launched into space using SS 18, then it is possible to simultaneously solve the problem of constipation in American congregation.
    1. Andrey77 3 November 2015 18: 52 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      You can just show the pipis. Why such difficult decisions? =) Although if personally YOU are ready to sponsor YOUR proposal ... I do not mind.
  14. bad
    bad 3 November 2015 18: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: sever.56
    All is correct. Do not cut the same thing as with the traitor “hunchback” and “lover of the hot” EBN that can be used as part of the space program. Saving money will be tangible.
    fact .. besides a prudent attitude and associated disposal good earnings + advertisement of the reliability of ICBMs, though old .. let our toad strangle our strangers .. laughing
    1. Andrey77 3 November 2015 18: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Doubtful toad. Junk in rocketry, as in aviation, is unacceptable.
      1. Boa kaa 3 November 2015 21: 03 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Andrey77
        Junk in rocketry, as in aviation, is unacceptable.
        Andrew! Be careful on turns, not Hami forum users.
        About business. Junk is unacceptable anywhere in military affairs. This is an axiom, but it does not exclude the modernization capabilities of the product. Example SU-24M and its work in Syria.
        And when * margin of safety * ends and the product becomes obsolete morally and physically, it must be disposed of, spending energy, money, resources. In order not to do this with a car, cunning Germans (japanes) sell used cars (3-5 years or more) for cheap to CIS dealers. The benefit is twofold: you do not need to pay 2200 euros for disposal, plus 2-2,5 in your pocket; 3 thousand eureka.
        So it is here. We recycle, we get a fee for the launch of an artificial satellite, we train the combat crews of the aerospace forces.
        1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          There are more careful. :) I am silent.
  15. Old26 3 November 2015 19: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Vita VKO
    It would not be bad to consider the option of disposal with the replacement of nuclear b.ch. on the usual.

    We’ve been resisting for 15 years to prevent the Americans from having such a rocket and will we develop it ourselves? Oh well

    Quote: Finches
    The right decision, but I still wanted to correct the author - to use our classification of the name weapons - "Voivode", personifying power, generosity, but reminiscent of the immortal immortal: "Who will come to us with a sword ..."! And about the "Satan" - let some Financial Times write, so that the average man quickly bangs his legs, contributing his money to the construction of gas stations in Afghanistan ...!

    Maybe the author should be corrected, but unfortunately he does not know (like us) the "name" of conversion missiles launched under the Dnepr program. Only indexes are known. So he wrote "Satan" (although there is still an RS-20B, but for many this does not say anything). And "Satan" is heard. Although, of course, even the mention of "Satan" is not entirely correct.

    Quote: Eugene-Eugene
    Now it seems that the very old Governors will convert

    It will be a rather laborious conversion. After all, the Voivode is different from previous missiles of this family. And to convert a rocket without the participation of a developer is a game of Russian roulette

    Quote: Andrey77
    But is it worth revising the START-2 treaty? Why should we cut?

    START 2? Dear, for several years there has been a START-3 treaty. For which no one should cut anything ... According to START-2, the EMNIP also. But on START-1 - yes, the Americans demanded the destruction of heavy missiles

    Quote: Mama_Cholli
    If at the same time 100 satellites are launched into space using SS 18

    And each weighing 3 tens of kilograms ... And why? What will such satellites give?
    1. solohan 3 November 2015 20: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      [media = http: //prntscr.com/8ymk8p]
  16. Jurkovs 3 November 2015 19: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It turns out for the Union-2.1V and Angara-1.2PP will never work.
  17. Old26 3 November 2015 20: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Jurkovs
    It turns out for the Union-2.1V and Angara-1.2PP will never work.

    Why not? Will be. But 100 satellites on SS-18 is stupid
    1. Mama_Cholli 5 November 2015 11: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Stupidity - not to see the obvious ...
  18. msm
    msm 3 November 2015 20: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Oh gentlemen! This is the right thing. And for the gift, i.e. each has already been paid in the past ... And how many satellites it will not be up to you to decide!
  19. propolsky 3 November 2015 20: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A competent solution, but as the warranty time comes out and when troops are replenished with new types of missiles, at the same time, you can test the quality of the missiles remaining on duty.
  20. Old26 3 November 2015 21: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: propolsky
    A competent solution, but as the warranty time comes out and when troops are replenished with new types of missiles, at the same time, you can test the quality of the missiles remaining on duty.

    Those missiles that became Dnepr conversion missiles have been in service for 6 years now. And launches do not occur so often. 1-2 times a year. For 16 years, only 22 Dnipro were launched. Another launch is planned for 2015, 3 in 2016 and 1 in 2017. And it looks like this Dnipro will end.
  21. Wildfox 3 November 2015 21: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Jurkovs
    It turns out for the Union-2.1V and Angara-1.2PP will never work.

    Why not? Will be. But 100 satellites on SS-18 is stupid

    About 100 satellites, as I understand it, this is a hundred missiles at the same time or in a short period of time. Fantasy is fun, but if we allow the problems with constipation to be solved, I think of the neighbors of Russia and even in Australia. hi
  22. afrikanez 3 November 2015 21: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This I understand, the correct approach to business. Well done !!! good
  23. Old26 3 November 2015 22: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: WildFox
    About 100 satellites, as I understand it, this is a hundred missiles at the same time or in a short period of time. Fantasy is fun, but if we allow the problems with constipation to be solved, I think of the neighbors of Russia and even in Australia.

    The author of STA SATELLITES most likely spoke of one rocket.
    Hundreds of Dnepr missiles we simply do not have now. As far as I know, in the next two years it is planned to launch only 5 Dnipro. Like not even hundreds of other launch vehicles. So the author’s fantasy. Moreover, the weight of the satellites will be 30 kg, for which there are so many such small ones - maybe the author knows laughing
  24. user3970 4 November 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But is it, dear colleagues, connected with an acute shortage of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium for our missiles? As far as I have information, the last weapons-grade plutonium under the Gore-Chernomyrdin treaty set the United States GDP last year. Uranium mines in Russia are depleted. Uranium mines in Kazakhstan were bought by the United States (or rather, not the mines themselves, but the power plants that feed them. It's cheaper.). So I'm afraid, colleagues, Russia's nuclear forces are a dummy. That is what is in “Satan” - this is our everything.
    1. NEXUS 4 November 2015 09: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: user3970
      But is it, dear colleagues, connected with an acute shortage of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium for our missiles? As far as I have information, the last weapons-grade plutonium under the Gore-Chernomyrdin treaty set the United States GDP last year. Uranium mines in Russia are depleted. Uranium mines in Kazakhstan were bought by the United States (or rather, not the mines themselves, but the power plants that feed them. It's cheaper.). So I'm afraid, colleagues, Russia's nuclear forces are a dummy. That is what is in “Satan” - this is our everything.

      Source to the studio.
  25. user3970 4 November 2015 09: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But is it, dear colleagues, connected with an acute shortage of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium for our missiles? As far as I have information, the last weapons-grade plutonium under the Gore-Chernomyrdin treaty set the United States GDP last year. Uranium mines in Russia are depleted. Uranium mines in Kazakhstan were bought by the United States (or rather, not the mines themselves, but the power plants supplying them. It’s cheaper.). So I'm afraid, colleagues, Russia's nuclear forces are a dummy. That is what is in “Satan” - this is our everything.
    1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Uranium mines ... Enriched plutonium or uranium is used in nuclear weapons. Enrichment is done by nuclear power plants.
      All work to the fullest. You are not in the subject, and climb.
  26. Old26 4 November 2015 10: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: user3970
    But is it, dear colleagues, connected with an acute shortage of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium for our missiles?

    Is there a deficit? Didn't know right

    Quote: user3970
    As far as I have information, the last weapons-grade plutonium under the Gore-Chernomyrdin treaty set the United States GDP last year.

    The value of your information is almost zero. At least because, according to the Gore-Chernomyrdin treaty, we did not supply weapons-grade plutonium or even weapons-grade uranium to the United States ...

    Quote: user3970
    Uranium mines in Russia are depleted.

    certainly exhausted. International organizations involved in monitoring the uranium problem believe that uranium reserves in Russia for 2011 are scanty. Only Four hundred and eighty-seven thousand two hundred tons or about 9,15% of the world's uranium reserves (third after Australia and Kazakhstan).
    And uranium is almost never produced.
    In 2006 we produced a total of 3262 tons
    In 2009 - 3564
    In 2012, slightly less - 2872
    In 2013 - 3135 tons.

    Quote: user3970
    exhausted. Uranium mines in Kazakhstan were bought by the United States (or rather, not the mines themselves, but the power plants that supply them. It's cheaper.)

    And?
    What, because of this, Kazakhstan stopped producing and selling uranium?

    Quote: user3970
    So I'm afraid, colleagues, Russia's nuclear forces are a dummy. That is what is in “Satan” - this is our everything.


    Of course a dummy. Several thousand warheads awaiting dismantling (not counting those in storage) - this is really a dummy
    And what is, as you write in Satan, is less than 40% of warheads in the Strategic Missile Forces onlynot to mention all our SNFs, there is the GOD of Satan - about 29%
    1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The man blurted out without thinking. The ore enriched with uranium still needs to be processed. Somewhere. Then, from the processed ore must be made. Somehow.
  27. Old26 4 November 2015 10: 45 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    Source to the studio.

    Do not wait. it PERSONAL OPINION OF THE AUTHOR unbased post
  28. Gomel 4 November 2015 11: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    article minus due to title
    not Satan but the Governor,
    Journalists! let’s go over to all NATO standards right away, and not just in journalism and classification.
  29. Old26 4 November 2015 11: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Gomel
    article minus due to title
    not Satan but the Governor,
    Journalists! let’s go over to all NATO standards right away, and not just in journalism and classification.

    The article did not put no plus, no minus. In general, sometimes something is slurred. What does the phrase mean
    The newest Satan launch rocket launch system will be created in 2017,

    And now they are being launched with holy spirit, and what is the essence of this new launch system? Now what’s being done is completely different

    Well, the phrase
    An example of successful implementation of programs is the use of the Voyevoda heavy rocket (NATO's SS-18 Satan classification) and the Rokot light rocket, created on the basis of the RS-18 being removed from service, for launching satellites into orbit.

    generally killed. Immediately all possible classifications. Well, to this very phrase there are significant questions. Where did the author see the Voyevoda rocket launch something, some satellites? This, Dmitry, is an indirect answer to your question. The author does not know the name of the rocket (and it doesn’t exist) on the basis of which the Dnepr conversion launch vehicle was created. Well, it doesn’t have its own name. Therefore the phrase conversion rocket "SATAN" in this case, more accurate than the conversion rocket "VOEVODA"
    1. Andrey77 4 November 2015 12: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Satan is American slang, originally. All rockets of the surface-to-surface class have the letter "S" on them (from Surface - surface). Satan is no exception.
  30. Old26 4 November 2015 12: 45 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Andrey77
    Satan is American slang, originally. All rockets of the surface-to-surface class have the letter "S" on them (from Surface - surface). Satan is no exception.

    I know it. But specifically in the context of the launch of Dnepr conversion missiles, the designation SATAN is in principle suitable (not fully, but suitable). The designation of the VOEVODA is generally out of place