The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation plans to reduce the service life for contractors who want to fight international terrorism

41
On the federal portal of draft regulations published amendments to the law "On Military Duty and Military Service" proposed by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, which provide for the possibility of reduced contracts for military personnel who have expressed a desire to fight international terrorism outside of Russia, writes RIA "News".



It is noted that if the project is approved by the public, conscripts, as well as citizens who are in reserve, entering military service during a period of martial law or a state of emergency, during armed conflicts, will be able to sign an agreement with the Ministry of Defense for a period of six months to a year.

Currently, such contracts cannot be concluded for a period of less than two years. The discussion of the amendments is open until November 16. It is planned that the law will come into force in August next year.
  • http://belsat.eu
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +8
    3 November 2015 12: 32
    I absolutely agree with this decision, if it is accepted!
    Guys will risk their lives defending Russia, protecting us at distant approaches. They need to protect the service life for three years!
    1. +7
      3 November 2015 13: 10
      Formal mercenaries in essence, but without criminal liability. Everything is better than PMCs. All the same, on behalf of the state people will act.
      1. +1
        3 November 2015 19: 25
        Quote: marlin1203
        Formal Mercenary Essence
        Where did you find mercenaries here? It's about contract soldiers who will defend the interests of the state, their homeland abroad.
    2. +2
      3 November 2015 13: 10
      Judging by the comments, the people did not understand that Russia was preparing for war. WAR IS THE SAME DIFFERENT. Yesterday, the FSB issued a warning in the border regions of Karelia with the Norwegians possible terrorist acts. This is the same war.
      1. +2
        3 November 2015 14: 27
        Quote: juborg
        Judging by the comments, the people did not understand that Russia was preparing for war. WAR IS THE SAME DIFFERENT. Yesterday, the FSB issued a warning in the border regions of Karelia with the Norwegians possible terrorist acts. This is the same war.

        So you know Karelia has no border with Norway. Not at all. From the extreme point of Karelia to Norway, more than 260 km in a straight line. hi
        1. 0
          3 November 2015 16: 48
          Sorry described, with the Finns. I just read an article about the Norwegian Navy before.

          Quote: pv1005
          Quote: juborg
          Judging by the comments, the people did not understand that Russia was preparing for war. WAR IS THE SAME DIFFERENT. Yesterday, the FSB issued a warning in the border regions of Karelia with the Norwegians possible terrorist acts. This is the same war.

          So you know Karelia has no border with Norway. Not at all. From the extreme point of Karelia to Norway, more than 260 km in a straight line. hi
      2. -2
        3 November 2015 14: 38
        Quote: juborg
        the people did not understand that Russia was preparing for war.



        Lord, I did not understand only the blind and the deaf ...
        Such as now, probably, in the whole history was not even when the civil war was going on ...

        Done around, bite where and wherever ...

        In short, you need to forget about the reserve and the resignation and be prepared ... At least, at least locally, pensioners can fight terrorists ...
    3. +3
      3 November 2015 13: 19
      Quote: sever.56
      I absolutely agree with this decision, if it is accepted!
      Guys will risk their lives defending Russia, protecting us at distant approaches. They need to protect the service life for three years!


      Valery, it is difficult to judge by such meager information, but it seems that the conversation is about the term of the contract, with the aim of using trained personnel in certain situations, but there is silence about preferential service.

      Well, something like that, Dear colleague. hi
    4. +1
      3 November 2015 13: 20
      If you have noticed, then the idea of ​​the pushed decision is not in the preferential length of service (that would be positive) of the contractor, but in reducing the term of his service in the armed forces. And for what? I believe that in order to increase the influx of people into the armed forces who want to reduce their already short military service on conscription and hope for a chance in terms of survival.
      1. 0
        3 November 2015 13: 34
        So not only can military service be reduced
      2. +4
        3 November 2015 13: 34
        No need to speculate! Read the article carefully:
        "entering military service during martial law or a state of emergency, during armed conflicts"
        1. +1
          3 November 2015 13: 37
          Quote: Artyom
          No need to speculate! Read the article carefully:
          "entering military service during martial law or a state of emergency, during armed conflicts"


          A competent comment, dear colleague. hi
    5. +1
      3 November 2015 14: 35
      Quote: sever.56
      They need to protect the service life for three years!



      So it is and so according to the law in the conduct of hostilities counts a day for three ...

      Here the question of lowering the minimum threshold for concluding a service contract is raised ... And another question immediately arises: it is important that officials from the Ministry of Defense do not recruit someone who is not clear and do not send to Syria or wherever just cannon fodder ... You need to recruit specialists, not drunks , and think over some other benefits upon returning, so that later in the military registration and enlistment office the Motherland Mother, represented by the military commissar, does not say: "But we did not send you there" ...

      Plus, if he died, there should also be insurance normal for the family ...
    6. +2
      3 November 2015 14: 57
      I think this law is being worked out for Syria, I can of course be mistaken, but something tells me that I think it is right! Most likely not far off when you still need some number of professionals who will be needed and on earth I think there can be two teams, because there is something USA muddied, here is a surprise for them!
    7. 0
      3 November 2015 19: 48
      the conversation is not about fighting - but about the fact that the contract may be less than on two year
  3. +3
    3 November 2015 12: 32
    Saving on preparation is not very beautiful. Type: train at home, on cats ..
  4. +8
    3 November 2015 12: 32
    The contract for six months? I'm certainly not a great specialist in military art, but what can I recall for six months? But he will learn to own new technology, and it’s impossible to use it correctly at all.
    1. +22
      3 November 2015 12: 36
      Quote: Wedmak
      The contract for six months? I'm certainly not a great specialist in military art, but what can I recall for six months? But he will learn to own new technology, and it’s impossible to use it correctly at all.

      ----------------------
      It is very similar to the legalization of volunteers who want to participate in hot spots ...
      1. +2
        3 November 2015 12: 52
        wanting to participate in hot spots ...

        Yes, but still it turns out that the Russian Army will participate. Anyway. And we seem to have enough people. But in wartime, there’s no alternative at all, everyone will go.
      2. +2
        3 November 2015 17: 08
        Quote: Altona
        It is very similar to the legalization of volunteers who want to participate in hot spots ...

        And you don’t have to go far for an example: the reception of such volunteers (presumably with certain experience, not anyhow anyone) has organized the Ministry of Defense for service in Syria on a contract basis. In my opinion, there was even an article on this subject.
    2. +3
      3 November 2015 12: 47
      Service under the contract should be in addition to universal military duty. No need to become like trading countries - the United States and Britain. No ocean will protect us, the strait and the more so soldiers fighting for money. History has shown that the best armies are those that are recruited.
  5. +6
    3 November 2015 12: 33
    It’s time to pass the law on PMCs. Amerikosy and their partners deftly sent their people to the Donbass under this shop. Although they fall under the article of mercenarism, you can calmly hire people from all over the world and at the same time seem to be out of business.
  6. +4
    3 November 2015 12: 33
    Well, right, in hot spots for a year or two
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +4
    3 November 2015 12: 41
    Dear, or I do not understand, it is the trained military personnel participating in "hot spots" outside the Motherland who have the right to use this decision, it seems to me quite correct and timely, only for draft categories to emphasize on a voluntary basis
    1. 0
      3 November 2015 14: 06
      Quote: 31rus
      Dear, or I do not understand, it is the trained military personnel participating in "hot spots" outside the Motherland who have the right to use this decision, it seems to me quite correct and timely, only for draft categories to emphasize on a voluntary basis


      Do you think that the young fighter will have to take the boys on the front line?
      Think what you say!
  9. +2
    3 November 2015 13: 00
    [quote = sever.56] I absolutely agree with this decision, if it is accepted.
    And if they don’t accept, then I don’t agree, and let injustice be happening?
  10. +1
    3 November 2015 13: 12
    Everyone has the right to decide what to do. But legislate this right decision.
  11. +3
    3 November 2015 13: 15
    Maybe it's time for us to single out in the structure of the RF Armed Forces a unit like the "Foreign Legion"? Only from the citizens of the Russian Federation and for actions SUUBO outside the territory of the Russian Federation, it is even possible with basing on the territory of other states. With an emphasis on anti-terror, the army will still fight.
    1. 0
      3 November 2015 14: 43
      Quote: Maksus
      Maybe it's time for us to single out in the structure of the RF Armed Forces a unit like the "Foreign Legion"? Only from the citizens of the Russian Federation and for the actions of SUUBO outside the territory of the Russian Federation,



      A little bit wrong ... Many come to the French Foreign Legion precisely in order to earn permanent citizenship ...

      Actually, this idea has a right to exist and life ... If only its boyars were not ruined by law, as usual ...
    2. 0
      3 November 2015 17: 17
      Quote: Maksus
      Maybe it's time for us to single out in the structure of the RF Armed Forces a unit like the "Foreign Legion"? Only from the citizens of the Russian Federation and for actions SUUBO outside the territory of the Russian Federation, it is even possible with basing on the territory of other states. With an emphasis on anti-terror, the army will still fight.

      The Ministry of Defense accepts foreign citizens from 18 to 40 years old for a term of 2 years. All comers (mainly CIS citizens) undergo rigorous selection and serve, as a rule, at Russian military bases abroad. The contract also stipulates that they may be involved in the database outside of Russia. There was an article on this topic.
  12. +1
    3 November 2015 13: 21
    Muscle your body and train for the benefit of military affairs (Ingenious agitation in the SA of the 70s)! The right proposal for young patriots! Judging by the fact that they have surrounded us from all sides, we must prepare for war now, so as not to be late at one o’clock X!
  13. 0
    3 November 2015 13: 37
    And we must come up with the protection of the civilian population and you and me within the country, there are many strangers but there is no hope for cops
  14. 0
    3 November 2015 13: 39
    It's simple, you come to the military registration and enlistment office, you sign a contract for six months, you go to war and six months later go home, that's all. And the w / c that serve, I think this is not for them, they have their own cockroaches.
  15. 0
    3 November 2015 13: 52
    In my opinion, PMCs are more promising in terms of performing short-term operations, and in terms of selecting candidates it is stricter; there is no point in hiring cannon fodder; insurance comes out expensively (there was an article here that ~ $ 250k), and in terms of selecting weapons not limited to statutory samples, plus there is no need explain the presence of such a contingent at the state level.
  16. 0
    3 November 2015 13: 57
    And this innovation is more likely for adventurers and romantics who want to fight, but do not want to be connected for a long time with the whole of Russia
  17. 0
    3 November 2015 13: 59
    It is high time! To think about the interests of the state and even begin to act in advance. And not when the enemy is already looking at Moscow domes with binoculars!
  18. 0
    3 November 2015 14: 06
    As far as I understand, this is a calculation for conscripts who want a "war", but do not want a household routine. I signed a contract for six months or a year - and for the war, then free. But for what purposes are they going to get shot at in the rear of young guys without work and with experience, eh?
  19. bad
    0
    3 November 2015 15: 26
    eh .. I would go to fight for the interests of the state even though I am 44 .. both Chechens behind me .. I’m sure people like me will agree to take up arms ... only the age of the obstacle .. recourse
    1. 0
      3 November 2015 17: 23
      Quote: bad
      eh .. I would go to fight for the interests of the state even though I am 44 .. both Chechens behind me .. I’m sure people like me will agree to take up arms ... only the age of the obstacle .. recourse

      And what does age have to do with it, tea is not a pensioner yet, if there is health, experience of service, desire to serve at least in Syria, though where there is - forward to the contract, all the more the minimum wage was reduced from 2 years to six months (next year)
  20. 0
    3 November 2015 18: 22
    I don’t understand if it will be during the introduction of martial law or a state of emergency, then those who are in reserve can be mobilized or the law was changed again? One gets the impression that they are trying to organize and streamline (read, use) a "volunteer movement" (citizens who are ready to defend Russia's interests). At the same time, the state could, if something happened, distance itself from them (in the United States, PMCs play a similar role). Our employees of PMCs, in my opinion, fall under the law on mercenarism.
  21. 0
    3 November 2015 19: 44
    As I understand it, ours are preparing for the deployment of ground troops to Syria.
  22. 0
    5 November 2015 00: 31
    Quote: kod3001
    Most likely not far off when you still need a certain number of professionals who will be needed and on earth I think the team can be two

    Do you think that they are not there now, even if not in the amount of one or two brigades ??

    Quote: Altona
    It is very similar to the legalization of volunteers who want to participate in hot spots ...

    Looks like

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"