Military Review

Media: Cameron had to abandon military plans in Syria

35
British Prime Minister Cameron, not having received support from Labor, was forced to abandon plans to strike at the IG facilities in Syria, reports RIA News message of the Times newspaper.




“Voting on the issue of strengthening military operations across the border of Iraq, which was expected before the end of this year, will not take place. The Prime Minister was unable to convince a sufficient number of Labor Party deputies Jeremy Corbin and put down resistance in the Tory ranks, ”the newspaper writes.

According to the source of the publication, Corbin said to the Prime Minister: “I support only peaceful solutions in the conflict.”

“This situation is likely to be a huge disappointment for the United States, which last week decided to send American special forces to 50 to Syria”- the newspaper believes.

Recall british aviation Since 2013, has been participating in the operation against IS in Iraq. However, the parliament did not allow the use of the Royal Air Force in Syria.
Photos used:
AP Photo / Virginia Mayo
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 3 November 2015 09: 20
    +5
    Anglo-Saxons decided to speak out against the plans of the coalition? Apparently very hot, since they did not support their "best partner".
    1. vkl-47
      vkl-47 3 November 2015 09: 27
      +7
      who will bomb their own. in vain did they swell in ig grandmas
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 3 November 2015 09: 57
        +1
        It’s just that this Cameron wants to save his face, at least some, so spat on by his own citizens!
        1. _Vladislav_
          _Vladislav_ 3 November 2015 10: 07
          +4
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Apparently very hot, since they did not support their "best partner".

          Quote: Baikonur
          It’s just that this Cameron wants to save his face, at least some, so spat on by his own citizens!

          No, the point is that the parliament understood one simple thing - British aviation will strike, will not strike - this will not affect the activity of ISIS. And with the connection to the Syrian process of Russia, this generally loses all meaning. Burning for free aviation kerosene.

          PS
          .... that is, they refused for the same reason as Canadians.
    2. volot-voin
      volot-voin 3 November 2015 09: 40
      +5
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Anglo-Saxons decided to speak out against the plans of the coalition? Apparently very hot, since they did not support their "best partner".

      Soon it will be possible to strike at ISIS targets in the UK and throughout Western Europe, if migration policy and American expansion in the Middle East continue.
    3. SPACE
      SPACE 3 November 2015 09: 41
      0
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Anglo-Saxons decided to speak out against coalition plans? Apparently very hot

      Caliber probably afraid.
      Putin put a cool plug on them and you can’t refuse to fight against the igil and the Russian Federation cannot be blamed for the fight against the igil and it’s impossible to participate in the coalition to help Syria, turn like a snake in a pan.
    4. Vend
      Vend 3 November 2015 09: 44
      +1
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Anglo-Saxons decided to speak out against the plans of the coalition? Apparently very hot, since they did not support their "best partner".

      Yes, that's for sure, that’s what, and the Anglo-Saxons do not differ in stupidity. They see that the matter is moving to a copper basin
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 3 November 2015 10: 02
      +1
      Cameron not receiving support from Laborites,
      out of habit, I read: from the liberals ... winkedLTD!!! the opposition is not sleeping, immediately minus slapped! laughing
      1. Andrea
        Andrea 3 November 2015 10: 26
        0
        The coalition is starting to run away. Why would it? Canada, now England.
        Does international law really mean anything to them?
        If so, what will follow? what
        1. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 3 November 2015 11: 31
          +1
          Quote: Andrea
          The coalition is starting to run away. Why would it? Canada, now England.
          Does international law really mean anything to them?
          If so, what will follow?

          I am interested in your comment, Andrey. The thought came to my mind, it seems that the law plays a small part here. Both in Canada and in Great Britain, these decisions were made by the opposition parties to the current government. In this connection, as an option, these are elements of the internal political struggle of the ruling elites of these states. And of course, given the futility of investing in the "Syria project" after Russia's intervention in it.

          Well, something like this thought arose, Dear colleague. hi
          1. marlin1203
            marlin1203 3 November 2015 13: 24
            +1
            Such a situation has developed in foreign policy that while Obama is in power, any interaction from the United States somehow automatically lowers his own domestic political rating. That's all.
  2. avvg
    avvg 3 November 2015 09: 21
    +1
    First, let them put things in order in Iraq, deal with them (terrorists). The Syrians will do without them
    1. venaya
      venaya 3 November 2015 09: 33
      0
      Quote: avvg
      Let them first put things in order in Iraq, deal with them (terrorists).

      They have already established their "order" there. As far as I understand, everyone is already terrified of this order.
  3. hydrox
    hydrox 3 November 2015 09: 22
    +2
    Poor Yankees!
    Probably, all angles in the Pentagon were alike from anger, and the Vietnamese senator-veteran is generally sitting in a puddle ...
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 3 November 2015 10: 08
      +9
      (hydrox) -A Vietnamese veteran senator generally sits in a puddle ... many probably did not know:
      Retired Lieutenant Colonel Yury Petrovich Trushechkin was part of a missile crew that destroyed an American plane flying the future US presidential candidate John McCain in the sky over Vietnam and even took his personal documents as a trophy. smile
  4. svetoruss
    svetoruss 3 November 2015 09: 22
    +1
    According to the source of the publication, Corbin said to the Prime Minister: “I support only peaceful solutions in the conflict.”
    In short, he sent the prime minister to ... in English
  5. Decathlon
    Decathlon 3 November 2015 09: 23
    +1
    We started jumping off the tram ?! First Canada, now Great Britain, who else is still there who speaks English ?!
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 3 November 2015 09: 27
      +1
      Quote: Decathlon
      We started jumping off the tram ?! First Canada, now Great Britain, who else is still there who speaks English ?!

      More Australians are pasty such a hall ...
      And who wants to shoot the personnel, because the Russians do not see from above what is written on their blindfolds or uniforms (they even don’t even see uniforms!)
    2. demo
      demo 3 November 2015 10: 03
      0
      Australia, New Zealand. The next step is probably Ukraine will become English-speaking.
  6. slava5553
    slava5553 3 November 2015 09: 24
    +1
    The split in the coalition continues. Canada, Britain - who is next?
  7. SAM 5
    SAM 5 3 November 2015 09: 27
    +1
    Recall, British aviation since 2013 takes part in operations against IS in Iraq

    Eh, Labor, why didn't you let the RAF finish off the damned IS. Those are now perked up. They will say: "Glory to Allah, there will be no Englishmen. Otherwise it would be like last time.
    -What is it like?
    -As they arrived, they flew away. "
  8. venaya
    venaya 3 November 2015 09: 29
    0
    Corbin told the Prime Minister: “I support only peaceful solutions to the conflict.”

    God forbid, change their minds, get rid of their habits. We need not only to hope for this, but also to contribute in every way to such trends, to develop a more peaceful tendency.
    1. SAM 5
      SAM 5 3 November 2015 09: 37
      +1
      develop more peaceful trends

      With IG? belay
      1. venaya
        venaya 3 November 2015 09: 53
        +1
        Quote: SAM 5
        develop more peaceful trends
        With IG?

        So what? Someone provided examples that they are fighting ISIS? I (and maybe not only me) do not even consider such an option that they at least once really were able to demonstrate that they are fighting with some real terrorists. Always, and this case is no exception, that they fight only for their own selfish interests. I have never watched them otherwise.
  9. Wolka
    Wolka 3 November 2015 09: 36
    +2
    and what actually bothers, everything according to plan, everything is under control, why did you dear Canadians and Britons rush headlong to rush after the Yankees into this whirlpool, which they themselves divorced, because you have raped from this hell, besides your expenses, yes nothing, your authority as a world power has only dropped to critical, if not shameful, then, you must learn to live with your own mind and not dance to the yankee's sugary pipe ...
  10. Stinger
    Stinger 3 November 2015 09: 39
    +2
    The main thing is to wash off in time. And it is right.
  11. ilija93
    ilija93 3 November 2015 09: 40
    +2
    Judging by the actions of our airborne forces, our pilots themselves, soon the objects will not be enough
    Interestingly igil, in turn, also refused to strike at targets in London.
  12. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 3 November 2015 09: 49
    +3
    However, the parliament did not allow the use of the Royal Air Force in Syria.
    As I understand it, no one has been asking permission from Syria for a long time
  13. BOB044
    BOB044 3 November 2015 09: 50
    +1
    British Prime Minister Cameron, having not received support from the Labor Party, was forced to abandon plans to strike at IS facilities in Syria.
    When the Russian VKS began to deliver real blows to the IS. And those under the offensive of the Syrian army began to retreat. That whole coalition from 64 countries realized that it was creating the appearance of a fight against IS. Now for them, Syria is lost and they understand this.
  14. veksha50
    veksha50 3 November 2015 09: 53
    +2
    "Recall since 2013, British aviation takes part in the operation against IS in Iraq... However, parliament did not allow the use of the RAF in Syria "....

    Somehow it sounds strange ... three years aviation has been involved in operations against IG, however its use against IG parliament not allowed...

    So they participated and now refused, or participated on paper ??? And where did then the permission command was given to shoot down Russian aircraft ???

    In general, the USA, Naglia and all this pack were so enthralled that they themselves won’t figure it out ...
  15. vell.65
    vell.65 3 November 2015 09: 55
    +1
    Quote: venaya
    Corbin told the Prime Minister: “I support only peaceful solutions to the conflict.”

    When in your country, bastards from different countries are cutting Boschs for the glory of the striped magnates - this is not a conflict.
  16. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 3 November 2015 10: 14
    0
    That’s all with words, God forbid, it will end. And so they will try and shut up at last.
  17. Victor-M
    Victor-M 3 November 2015 10: 27
    0
    «Such situation, probably, will be a huge disappointment for the USwho decided to send 50 US commandos to Syria last week, ”the newspaper said.

    It is good when your "allies" do what you want, and very bad and sad when they have the opportunity to act regardless of your policy. laughing
  18. roskot
    roskot 3 November 2015 11: 22
    0
    So England went into an inadequate position.
  19. kotev19
    kotev19 3 November 2015 12: 37
    0
    Recall to Cameron the words of the great Oliver Cromwell:
    "The state, choosing its servants, is not interested in their convictions. If only they serve it faithfully" lol
  20. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 3 November 2015 15: 06
    0
    Apparently, the "sober" has started working, it is not clear to bomb for four years what and whom For taxpayers' money, for the sake of fascington. The Americans have nothing to lose, with such a public debt, a billion more, a billion less.