Military Review

Media: Russia strengthens its position in the Asian arms market

37
Russia, under the influence of Western sanctions, is strengthening its presence in the arms market in Asia, writes the Defense News portal.


Media: Russia strengthens its position in the Asian arms market


“The significant presence of Russian weapons is already being felt in the Asian region. According to the Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), more than 60% of Russian exports weapons accounts for the countries of Asia and Oceania, the most active customers are India and China ", - quotes the publication RIA News.

"Russia may have the largest share in the Asian arms market, as it offers its customers attractive conditions for transactions with regional powers," the portal quotes the non-proliferation issues program at the Carnegie Moscow Center Peter Topychkanov. “Moscow has good chances to expand cooperation with Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan.”

The analyst at the same time notes that the Russian "defense industry" "is not so much space for maneuvers in the Asian arms market." In addition, the main buyers - China and India - “have begun to independently develop military projects.” In addition, American weapons still constitute the main competition.
Photos used:
www.apiural.ru
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 2 November 2015 15: 17 New
    20
    With such "advertising" (the Syrian operation), the rating of our weapons should reasonably jump up.
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 2 November 2015 15: 23 New
      19
      Yes, for SU-34 there should already be a line around the equator ... wink
      1. plotnikov561956
        plotnikov561956 2 November 2015 15: 59 New
        +7
        Not only for the Su-34 ... the Su-24. Su-25 has proved to be excellent
        1. Vladimyrych
          Vladimyrych 2 November 2015 16: 04 New
          +1
          SU-24s have not been produced as far as is known since 1993, so the bummer itself is not enough. laughing
      2. rapid1934
        rapid1934 2 November 2015 17: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: Vladimir
        Yes, for SU-34 there should already be a line around the equator ... wink

        For reference, China has long asked us for the Su-34. Rosoboron was not given the go-ahead for its sale. hi
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 2 November 2015 15: 24 New
      +9
      And what about sanctions? We have always been focused on this market. Always in this market have had a large share of arms sales. Defense News probably scares its readers.
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 2 November 2015 15: 39 New
        -12
        Toka ... Its army is armed mainly with ancient Soviet trash.
      2. Thronekeeper
        Thronekeeper 2 November 2015 16: 01 New
        +2
        HZ. With the European consumer, the first problem is NATO standards, not sanctions. The second one, which arose not so long ago, under the collaborative governments of Merkel and Hollande, although temporary, but the current governments will buy not what they need, but what the black sovereign will say. In addition, the Jews themselves produce a wide range of good weapons, and, of course, protectionism takes place.
        Sanctions are completely irrelevant here.
        And such major consumers of thief as India and China are almost entirely ours. If we consider it together with the Russian-Indian joint venture, there will be more than 60%.
        And American weapons are uncompetitive compared to Russian ones. Especially, with regard to air defense systems, which Russia is 20 years ahead of the United States, because potential partners did not really develop air defense systems, according to BTVT (it’s unrealistic to sell a postcard now), and as regards aviation, too, in any case, samples that are exported go, and the lack of normal means of destruction in the states.
        + less cost, added value and there is no such terrible corruption component in each device. Total price is much lower.
        + The US limits itself - China, for example, will never sell weapons (and he will never buy) for purely political reasons. India also eschews amervoor. And now she doesn’t want to deal with francs either. Because high-tech weapons are consumables and maintenance. And there is some kind of democratic reins that will get them under the fost. The big "non-political" nature of our weapons is one of the main advantages.
        Well, exclusives like Onyx clones, the fourth-generation near-air defense systems and the T-50, in return for which competitors simply have nothing to offer for lack of it.
        1. mvg
          mvg 2 November 2015 17: 44 New
          -8
          Full before, at least they would take an interest in the Internet before writing .. European air defense is no worse than ours, the Indians for the aircraft carrier chose the Jewish "Barak'i". S-300 in Syria successfully “missed” a couple of “God-chosen raids”. Russia does not have such an option as THAAD or SM-3 (A-159) for a long time ... it’s still far from the S-500 ... 400 have not been mastered. T-50 "flies" in the form of gliders .. without avionics. And the F-35 is already 120 pieces, not counting .. 20 training ones. Collected in Italy and Turkey .. No FCPGAs, or whatever they are, India will not buy .. they just carry the brain .. The T-90 has a lot of competitors .. and even in the MC version it’s not a very beautiful tank. What can we offer that which others do not have? Our options are Vietnam, Algeria, Indonesia ... drop dead ..
          1. The comment was deleted.
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 2 November 2015 15: 47 New
      +1
      Venezuela became interested in our dryers)
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 2 November 2015 18: 48 New
        -1
        But this is a poor banana republic. Why is cooperation with various underdeveloped poor people considered a breakthrough? The United States has as friends and trading partners the rich countries of old Europe and the other "collective west" - countries that live richly as in the west, but are not geographically related to it - such as Japan or Singapore. We should learn from the Americans, instead of watering them with sewage.
        1. VseDoFeNi
          VseDoFeNi 2 November 2015 18: 59 New
          0
          Quote: Basarev
          The United States has as friends and trading partners the rich countries of old Europe and the other "collective west" - countries that live richly as in the west, but are not geographically related to it - such as Japan or Singapore.

          You, not only you, have everything turned upside down.
          The West is a poor country, mired in debt, but because of their insolence pretending to be a rich life. And they are rapidly slipping into poverty more and more.

          Quote: Basarev
          We should learn from the Americans, instead of watering them with sewage.

          How to rob other countries and peoples? No, thank you. Russians will not be cannibals destroying others.
          If you are strong, you will help the weak, if you are rich you live in prosperity and help the poor. The West can only rob and eat.
        2. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 2 November 2015 19: 35 New
          0
          Quote: Basarev
          But this is a poor banana republic
          belay

          Arseny, but nothing that Venezuela is a member of OPEC and the largest exporter of oil on the American continent.

          Something happened, colleague. hi
          1. Vladimir 1964
            Vladimir 1964 2 November 2015 20: 49 New
            0
            And the cons for what? There is no error in the information. Cons to me on the drum, at least get away from them, but curiosity .... hi
            1. Basarev
              Basarev 2 November 2015 21: 15 New
              -4
              Have you seen the standard of living in Venezuela? And the Venezuelan favelas are almost more famous than the Brazilian ones ... And we consider friendship with these Holodrans to be an achievement?
              1. VseDoFeNi
                VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 08: 15 New
                0
                Quote: Basarev
                Have you seen the standard of living in Venezuela?

                The standard of living, this is not the level of availability of dough or consumption, you are ours our annual.
                Actually, you can be congratulated on the fact that you are a normal person. wink
                So. The first thing that distinguishes a downshifter from a normal person is that he brings down a deity named "level of material consumption" from the pedestal, and puts him on a par with other values. In particular, with such a banal value as the availability of free time, not busy with work. Well, and others, such as health.

                A normal person does not perceive this action as normal. For him, the level of material consumption, expressed in the amount of money spent on a monthly basis (mind you, are not earned at all, but spent are two different things) is the most important thing that is valuable to him in this life. All other values ​​are crowded somewhere at the foot, and are hardly noticeable. So let's list them. This is free time. Health. Recreation. Sleep. The level of cultural and intellectual development. Communication with friends (and their very presence). Communication with the family (and its very presence). Parenting (and their very presence). And much more. A normal person is ready to sacrifice all this, and sacrifices hard, for the sake of increasing the level of material consumption by a certain amount, say, 20%, during career growth. Money in this case has some mystical, religious significance. A normal person is not even able to think in this direction.

                It’s not far-sighted to measure everything with money, uncle. wink That way, not for long in old age, thunder into a nursing home.

                Quote: Basarev
                And do we consider friendship with these people to be an achievement?

                You consider bandits and robbers ideal, but in vain.
                “We British and Americans are thieves, robbers and pirates, and we are proud of it” Mark Twain.
          2. VseDoFeNi
            VseDoFeNi 4 November 2015 08: 06 New
            0
            Quote: Vladimir 1964
            Something happened, colleague.

            Well, for growing plants, you can call a banana. And Russia is a birch republic or a pine, if you will. laughing
  2. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 2 November 2015 15: 19 New
    +2
    More contracts - good and different. But you should not forget about the domestic market))
  3. user
    user 2 November 2015 15: 20 New
    +3
    In addition, American weapons are still the main competition.



    The arms supplier is determined by the policy, i.e. establishment. Therefore, the more Russia regains its presence on the lease of international relations, the more countries will buy our weapons, not everyone is satisfied with the current US dominance.
  4. venaya
    venaya 2 November 2015 15: 21 New
    +2
    Russia may have the largest share in the Asian arms market

    It is to this that we must exert our efforts. I consider this direction a priority. It’s not always worth it to fight with your own hands, it is worth connecting other human resources.
  5. IAlex
    IAlex 2 November 2015 15: 22 New
    +2
    It is interesting to ask GDP with a bear, and the Russian Federation, before strengthening its position in the Asian arms market, would not like to strengthen its position with weapons in its army ???
    1. venaya
      venaya 2 November 2015 15: 27 New
      0
      Quote: IAlex
      The Russian Federation, before strengthening its position in the Asian arms market, would not like to strengthen its position with weapons in its army ???

      It’s good to do this partly also at someone else’s expense, so we can allocate more weapons to our own needs.
      1. IAlex
        IAlex 2 November 2015 15: 37 New
        0
        Yeah, but you can still close your eyes and think about the good.
        for your own needs.
        from my taxes I need an army to defend myself, and not a prize to Rosoboronexport officials with kickbacks from sold equipment ...
    2. Snake AAA
      Snake AAA 2 November 2015 15: 28 New
      +1
      Well, if you are not comfortable, then in the army we are undergoing rearmament, of course, you won’t replace everything at once, since the equipment is not written off without having worked out the resource (and the crisis has made corrections), but the work is in full swing !!! So you are wrong in your statements.
      1. IAlex
        IAlex 2 November 2015 15: 37 New
        -7
        And what has already been rearmament in 25 years? Choose yourself:

        1. Navy
        2. Air Force
        3. ABM / ABM
        4. Motorized rifle
        .

        Personally, everything that I saw and see the production of the USSR with minimal updates of "yesterday" ... And non-stop feeding breakfast at an oil price of more than $ 120 for 15 years, because : "buy 300 T-90 tanks by 2030." (Ivanov), “By 2030 we will build an aircraft carrier”, “By 2020 we will buy 100 T-50s”, “By 2018 we will build the An-70”, etc. etc. where their mother is, where are all these storytellers and government cabbage ???
        1. Shmal_
          Shmal_ 2 November 2015 16: 19 New
          +5
          Every month a vessel of any class comes into operation. Twice a year, lots of new airplanes, helicopters arrive at the Air Force, and the airborne aircraft are constantly being upgraded! And so in all branches of the army. Only thoroughly stubborn, like you, may not notice this and write such stuffing!
          1. IAlex
            IAlex 2 November 2015 16: 28 New
            -3
            URApatriots recommend paying attention to the next mourning day, as well as looking at the payroll of the same fleet and ships of the first and second rank, as well as their age and construction time ... Or do you think the boat will replace the BOD? Although I think URApatriotam and a basin with a screwed flagpole will replace the cruiser ...

            And how many new helicopters have arrived? Lots of? Ha, ha, ha - yes, during this time, more than was withdrawn from the composition, and all the end of the Soviet period arrived - which is already obsolete.

            Well, yes, we have this in all branches of the armed forces, it’s hard to disagree with you - sheer hatred, sloppiness and junk ... Of modern technology, development after 91, the army probably doesn’t have more than one large model of equipment ...
            1. VseDoFeNi
              VseDoFeNi 2 November 2015 16: 50 New
              +2
              Quote: IAlex
              as well as their age and construction time.

              I remind all-crawlers that the Sedov bark will soon celebrate its centenary. And the US B-52 is also very ancient.

              Quote: IAlex
              Or do you think the boat will replace the BOD?

              As practice shows, a small missile ship with a displacement of only 900 tons scoops up for 2000 km +.

              Actually, you have already lost all battles and wars, whiners-liberals. In general, I am surprised how you still have not saved yourself from the Russian people and Russia.
              1. IAlex
                IAlex 2 November 2015 17: 01 New
                -1
                Yes, but they have dopiga B-1 and B-2, as well as F-22 and F-35 ...

                As practice shows, a small missile ship with a displacement of only 900 tons scoops up for 2000 km +. And what??? R-7 fumbled as much, only her time passed and the tasks were different ...

                I won’t say anything about what unrefined liberalists think, but I’ll say to myself that I will get URApatriotov constantly, because give them free rein, and they will quickly turn into Nazis from recklessness and inadequacy ...
                1. VseDoFeNi
                  VseDoFeNi 2 November 2015 17: 51 New
                  +1
                  Quote: IAlex
                  Yes, but they have dopiga B-1 and B-2, as well as F-22 and F-35 ...

                  This is an illusion, uncle. wassat

                2. The comment was deleted.
    3. VseDoFeNi
      VseDoFeNi 2 November 2015 16: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: IAlex
      It is interesting to ask GDP with a bear, and the Russian Federation, before strengthening its position in the Asian arms market, would not like to strengthen its position with weapons in its army ???

      Shaw, again?
      All merged? fool
      Citizen, make yourself a mourner at a funeral home, get rich. good
      1. IAlex
        IAlex 2 November 2015 16: 16 New
        -2
        So far, only in the funeral home they have ripped me off even 40 days have not passed, after the uncle in the hospital was treated, after an excellent healthcare reform. And I wish you to heal your health in a good hospital and use the services of excellent funeral services in our country, so as not to merge and have always been very calm ...
        1. VseDoFeNi
          VseDoFeNi 2 November 2015 16: 40 New
          +1
          Quote: IAlex
          I want to improve my health in a good hospital

          Medicine has not returned health to anyone, and disabled people, chronic patients, are producing well. So do not flatter yourself.
          Heart attacks in people do not arise from a lack of validol in the blood.

          I set the traumatology and related rehabilitation things separately as they explicitly correct the effects of external influences.
    4. russmensch
      russmensch 2 November 2015 17: 23 New
      0
      You can’t arm yourself a lot without money. Because the more contracts abroad, the more orders for themselves. It's simple.
  6. Snake AAA
    Snake AAA 2 November 2015 15: 22 New
    0
    Yes, given that our weapons are not whimsical and reliable in battle, and their prices are lower than Western standards, then only their Arabs, Syrians, Iraqis and others buy and use !!! Glory to the Russian military-industrial complex!
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 2 November 2015 15: 31 New
    +1
    If the moment with payment is well thought out, then the norms.
    Although payment in kind, that is, bases, also come down.
    At least in the form of the right to visit without notice.
  9. yuriy55
    yuriy55 2 November 2015 15: 41 New
    0
    Russia can(???) possess the largest share in the Asian arms market

    Must! Must become! Russia is part of Asia, and it is much closer to Asian markets than the United States. And, already, the range of military products we have is excellent. good
  10. Proxima
    Proxima 2 November 2015 15: 48 New
    0
    Quote: S_Baykala
    With such "advertising" (the Syrian operation), the rating of our weapons should reasonably jump up.

    We have a very high weapon rating without any advertising. Russia is in second place in terms of arms exports, and we are almost close to the first, which is now occupied by the United States.
  11. roskot
    roskot 2 November 2015 16: 42 New
    0
    It is what it is. Weapons have always been made. And not bad.
  12. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 2 November 2015 17: 20 New
    +1
    And with Pakistan, then why "Expand" cooperation in the military-technical sphere ??????????????????????? To Complicate-aggravate its long-standing friendship with India. Pakistan is a Longtime and Faithful CLIENT (Dog) of the States (in Afghanistan 1979-1989 - this was especially clearly manifested against us). And despite the Permanent Chills with the American Administration - America continues to Finance and Arms the ruling Fundamentalist Regime there - transferring billions of dollars to Pakistan every year). It is better to Strengthen its Military-Technical Cooperation with the DPRK (North Korea) - and supply it with the most modern weapons (from the S-400 and the Bastion complex (against the Aircraft Carriers) - to the latest MIG-35 and SU-35 fighter models). We cannot simply find a more Reliable Ally and Friend (who will never: betray, sell, and spit in the back — like the Khokhlys) in Southeast Asia. And Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia are Muslim (Fundamentalist Countries) - who are CLOSELY Connected (Cooperating) with the United States and NATO (like Thailand - which, under pressure from the States - was immediately given to them by Buta, at their first request), with Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia - it will be the same (all the Military products that we sell to them - they will, at the first request of the USA, be transferred or sold (for study and antidotes to our weapons) to the Americans. North Korea will not give ANYTHING and NEVER (from weapons) to the Americans (and will not sell.) Partners (for Vo technical-technical cooperation) you need to Choose Carefully - with the Mind (so that such Linden Partners do not transfer the weapons we sold to them to our main and Eternal potential adversary - the States). Not everyone needs to decide the money (when choosing a country - to sell Russian Weapons)
  13. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 2 November 2015 17: 29 New
    +3
    Guys, this is all of course good! But when will the domestic agricultural tractor be? When it will be
    domestic wide-spread sowing complex? Does the code for our reliable reversible plow appear in the series?
    And this is our safety!
    I myself work with imports ... American tractors, Canadian seedlings, French plows ...
    It got to the point that the seeds of sunflower hybrids are the same import!
    1. ASK505
      ASK505 2 November 2015 20: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: AlNikolaich
      But when will the domestic agricultural tractor be? When it will be


      When will the Second Industrialization begin on a new digital base. In the meantime, we cannot find Russian drivers for minibuses in Moscow.
  14. rusamas
    rusamas 2 November 2015 20: 50 New
    0
    Quote: AlNikolaich
    Guys, this is all of course good! But when will the domestic agricultural tractor be?

    The request is made with us, the tractor in google took me about 8-10 seconds
    http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/?search=%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D
    1% 8B
    Why can't you do that?