News

Media: Beijing responded to the presence of an American ship in the South China Sea naval maneuvers involving fighters

36
In response to the presence of Americans near the disputed islands in the South China Sea, China began a naval exercise, in which fighters armed with missiles lifted into the air, RIA News Post by South China Morning Post.


Media: Beijing responded to the presence of an American ship in the South China Sea naval maneuvers involving fighters


According to experts, Beijing has taken such a step in order to "protest the presence of the American warship in the waters of the South China Sea near territories that it considers its own."

Earlier, the Chinese Foreign Ministry protested to the United States, saying that the destroyer Lassen without permission "entered the territorial waters of the country," thereby "violating the sovereignty of China."

Chinese retired Admiral Shengli said on this occasion that "US actions are provocative," and anyone, "even a minor incident can provoke a war."

As experts noted, Beijing thereby demonstrates the seriousness of its intentions. “Both the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that China would hold accountable for violations of its maritime rights. Real actions should follow statements of this kind, ”the Admiral’s Chinese newspaper quotes.
Photos used:
http://navy.81.cn/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

We are in Yandex Zen
New photos of the Chinese fighter Chengdu J-20
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Air Force captain
    Air Force captain 2 November 2015 12: 01 New
    • 29
    • 0
    +29
    I would have fired rockets in the area of ​​the passage of the destroyer SGA ....
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 2 November 2015 12: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, if that Chinese contact us, we can help ..)))) The USA already knows our "hooligans" .. bully
      1. lis-ik
        lis-ik 2 November 2015 12: 26 New
        • 32
        • 0
        +32
        Meehan, you are a generous soul, why do we need someone else's conflict? In general, the big question is whether the Chinese will support us in the event of a mess, I personally doubt very much. Do not write for the sake of writing.
        1. MIKHAN
          MIKHAN 2 November 2015 13: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: lis-ik
          Meehan, you are a generous soul, why do we need someone else's conflict? In general, the big question is whether the Chinese will support us in the event of a mess, I personally doubt very much. Do not write for the sake of writing.

          I do not propose to stand up for the Chinese, we have enough of our own problems ... Well, just to "scare" the US along with China in a "friendly" way! Here in the 90s we sat back "Maybe it will carry ..." We almost lost Russia! hi We won’t be able to "sit back", I can smell it with genes and it’s better to work on warning ... These are the things in the missile forces! hi
          1. rasputin17
            rasputin17 2 November 2015 15: 26 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Really staying out in this swinging world does not work out since we see it as multipolar! hi
          2. proletarian
            proletarian 2 November 2015 22: 34 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            So I did not understand that in China there are not enough of their "hooligans", or what?
            I think so because the "East is a delicate matter" the Chinese do not want to show their "hooligan inclinations" ahead of time.
        2. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 2 November 2015 13: 39 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Chinese? The Chinese will wait for a decisive moment in turmoil, and will side with the winner. The Chinese are the Chinese ...
          1. kotvov
            kotvov 3 November 2015 10: 55 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The Chinese will wait for a decisive moment in turmoil, and will side with the winner. ,,
            Do you think the Chinese do not understand, Russia, the next China will collapse? They just got used to relying on time in everything, to sit and wait for the corpse of your enemy to pass by,
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. _Vladislav_
        _Vladislav_ 2 November 2015 12: 31 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Captain Air Force
        I would have fired rockets in the area of ​​the passage of the destroyer SGA ....

        In fact, this is an irresponsible act on the part of the United States (no matter how trite it sounds). They entered the territorial waters of another state, obviously counting on the loyalty and restraint of the Chinese side.

        But in principle, China had every right to sink the destroyer, all the more so a single goal it would not be so difficult. And from the legal side - that would be justified. But what - it would cause consequences is unknown.

        The USA is not so ready to fight with China, but it’s quite enough to drop its reputation by breaking the second bottom.
      4. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 2 November 2015 17: 46 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, if that Chinese contact us, we can help ..)))) The USA already knows our "hooligans" .. bully

        As history has shown the Chinese many times, the feeling of gratitude is completely unfamiliar, but add more aggressiveness and self-confidence.
    2. ty60
      ty60 2 November 2015 12: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And what prevents to ask for allied assistance from Russia? A couple of SU-24 is not a question to single out!
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 2 November 2015 13: 06 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: ty60
        And what prevents to ask for allied assistance from Russia? A couple of SU-24 is not a question to single out!
        Do we need this most of all? Let them figure it out
      2. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 2 November 2015 13: 41 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And what do you think they have a pair of bombers themselves, there is not?
      3. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 2 November 2015 18: 04 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        And what prevents us in this situation from doing what China itself is doing now ... Sit and watch from the side how they will exhaust each other ... And if in this swara the Japanese lovers of other islands also get it, then this generally a good deal.
    3. SALLAK
      SALLAK 2 November 2015 13: 20 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      You know, it’s not funny ... of course, it is unlikely that a significant incident will happen but there is a human factor ... And if everyone smells fried, it can become crowded on our small planet ... Therefore, I don’t see anything clever in thrash and bragging ... fighting is not the kind of "entertainment" that benefits health ...
      1. Kasym
        Kasym 3 November 2015 00: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The United States may receive an asymmetric response in the form of a Chinese base in the Caribbean (Cuba for example). It’s stupid now for Obama to also turn up China. No, it’s only good for us. Let the Chinese pull certain US resources from BV, Central Asia and Ukraine.
        And one more thing: Barack Obama himself is pushing the Chinese towards us. Well, who should Beijing seek support if it comes to hot? Indians and Pakistanis are unlikely (the former are like rivals, the latter were sitting on a leash in the USA yesterday). Yes, and at the international level, not members of the UN Security Council. But Russia is a different matter — it has at least four times “slapped” the United States (Minsk-2, the nuclear problem of Tehran, Syria with destroyed chemical weapons and a Caspian show).
        We add here the permanent exercises of the RF Armed Forces (CSTO) and the PRC.
        Hence the conclusion that it is foolish to bully the PRC. Political consequences can be dire for American hawks. Well, imagine that Beijing will declare that it is considering (at least so) the issue of joining the CSTO, or about its intentions to build a base of the Chinese Navy in Venezuela? Pentagon strategists will then have to take their time off Congress! laughing hi
  2. Wolka
    Wolka 2 November 2015 12: 06 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    unfortunately, China does not yet have the appropriate electronic warfare systems to teach the Yankees to the mind, as in the case of Donald Cook and our Su-24 in the Black Sea ...
    1. rBo3qb
      rBo3qb 2 November 2015 12: 23 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      hz their technology also does not stand still and declassify for the sake of window dressing they definitely will not
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 2 November 2015 12: 06 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: Captain Air Force
    I would have fired rockets in the area of ​​the passage of the destroyer SGA ....


    The Chinese urgently need to make their KHIBINS ... a very effective laxative for US Navy sailors.
    1. dckx
      dckx 2 November 2015 12: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Or an analogue of the Bastion mobile coastal missile system, I think it is precisely its “escort” of the destroyer that will make the team simulate the ship’s “physics of immersion”.
  4. Thronekeeper
    Thronekeeper 2 November 2015 12: 07 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    From the word "Modern."
    8 “Mosquitoes” will not be able to bring down even AUGs, not like some kind of EM.
    Even without firing. Accompany for 200 km.
    And fota Su-27 yellow assembly depressing. Sparrow and Winder maid in tea are not weapons.
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 2 November 2015 12: 10 New
    • 24
    • 0
    +24
    Americans, one hundred said ??? wassat
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 2 November 2015 12: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Found a scythe on a stone!
    Where do the fragments fly? fellow
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 2 November 2015 12: 12 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    This is to be expected. China can lead hard when necessary. And the Americans already definitely do not see the “shores” - the “exclusivity” is blind.
  8. Aroma77
    Aroma77 2 November 2015 12: 13 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Uh, the Chinese didn’t make those maneuvers, that’s the answer. Thinking instantly!
  9. 3 Gorynych
    3 Gorynych 2 November 2015 12: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quite an unpleasant environment for the Pacific. Given the fact that the former majestic Pacific Fleet is already gone .. And if a woman flounders in the SKM, it will not seem to anyone ... It’s far from II.!
  10. Signal
    Signal 2 November 2015 12: 36 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Only ram amers. Like "Selfless" (if I'm not mistaken) in the Black Sea.
    1. lwxx
      lwxx 2 November 2015 12: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      To do this, you must have confidence in their rightness and fortitude. And so this is another 101 Chinese warning. The Chinese are weak so far from the SGA, and not only by the army but also financially and politically. While they are quietly extending the sides of the territory expand.
    2. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 2 November 2015 12: 54 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Do not ram, but "To carry out the displacement from territorial waters by the method of bulk", like this said, it is a pity that not me! But this maneuver can only be performed by Russian sailors (the rest of the world has a "thin gut", because they don’t have marine "Alexandrov Matrosovs"!)
    3. VALERIK_097
      VALERIK_097 2 November 2015 13: 29 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This is a masterpiece, and the Chinese have a thin gut on such actions.
  11. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 2 November 2015 13: 51 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    How does China see it all ... (virtually)))) Cool but ....
    1. HAM
      HAM 2 November 2015 14: 05 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      What a stupid thing, but fantazerrrrr!
    2. Socialism 2.0
      Socialism 2.0 2 November 2015 14: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      here are the storytellers ..
      1. Banshee
        Banshee 2 November 2015 16: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        "And all win!"

        Probably, there Mihan earns additionally on hurray-patriotism, instructs.
  12. alkur
    alkur 2 November 2015 14: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Quote: lis-ik
    Meehan, you are a generous soul, why do we need someone else's conflict? In general, the big question is whether the Chinese will support us in the event of a mess, I personally doubt very much. Do not write for the sake of writing.

    I do not propose to stand up for the Chinese, we have enough of our own problems ... Well, just to "scare" the US along with China in a "friendly" way! Here in the 90s we sat back "Maybe it will carry ..." We almost lost Russia! hi We won’t be able to "sit back", I can smell it with genes and it’s better to work on warning ... These are the things in the missile forces! hi

    Mikhail, you need to live with your own mind, there is nothing to look at your neighbor and act from behind him.
    1. Banshee
      Banshee 2 November 2015 16: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      He is not Michael, he is Mihan. Or Vitaly.
  13. imugn
    imugn 2 November 2015 14: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The Americans, of course, are insolent, but the issue of artificial islands is very slippery. Some kind of international agreement is required. Otherwise, the same Americans will be able to wash these islands most of all.
  14. Babai34rus
    Babai34rus 2 November 2015 14: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Danger-Danger, play with FIRE!
  15. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 2 November 2015 15: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Ukrainians will fall asleep the Black Sea
  16. Same lech
    Same lech 2 November 2015 17: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    How does China see it all ... (virtually)))) Cool but ....



    And I liked it... smile only the ending should be slightly different ...

    the desert and two dirty grimy people with stone axes are standing opposite each other ... JOHN SMITH AND LEE SI TCHIN
  17. iv.ionov
    iv.ionov 2 November 2015 19: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: ty60
    And what prevents to ask for allied assistance from Russia? A couple of SU-24 is not a question to single out!

    How generous you are! A couple there, a couple here, for everyone, you won’t get enough steam! Let’s save for yourself, otherwise God forbid they come in handy !!!
  18. slizhov
    slizhov 2 November 2015 21: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done ...
    It’s time not only for Russia to give these partners the teeth!
  19. iov
    iov 6 November 2015 10: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    How does China see it all ... (virtually)))) Cool but ....

    not a very objective video ... and rather it’s not like a simulation, but an advertisement of Chinese military equipment ...... and as for their equipment .... it’s still far away for them
    1. iov
      iov 6 November 2015 10: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      although ... of course, in terms of propaganda it will go ... but in general ... my personal opinion is that China may be an ally to us, but certainly not a friend !!!