Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister said Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"

173
Head of Saudi delegation to the Vienna meeting of the Syrian Foreign Minister al-Dzhubeyr spoke about his vision of solving the Syrian crisis. According Dzhubeyra, the only thing "save Syria," Assad is leaving the post of president. "BBC" conveys the statement of the Saudi minister, who expresses obvious radicalism:

Either he (Assad - a comment. "VO") will go into the political process, or it will have to remove the force.


Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister said Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"


The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated like this: Who, in fact, is this Al Dzhubeyr who decides that he has some right to speak about the power shift leader of a foreign country? Anyway, since when diplomacy in a number of countries, including the same Saudi Arabia, began to consider its competence, the right or wrong choice was made by citizens of Syria? To get started in their own country at least some elections are held, and only because the Syrians to make comments ...

Meanwhile, the militant rhetoric of a Saudi official is not shared (or pretended not to be shared) in Washington. On the eve of the representatives of the US government said that "the departure of Assad from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States." It seems that the primary task for the United States is to continue the bloodshed in Syria while preserving the sources of destabilization with Assad or without Assad ...
173 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +95
    30 October 2015 15: 39
    I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"
    1. +26
      30 October 2015 15: 43
      Chezh did not remove it before?
      1. +51
        30 October 2015 15: 56
        Sweles
        Chezh did not remove it before?


        ... not shmogla .... shmogla current to Yanukovych .... because Ukrainians are the most stupid ... laughing
        1. +39
          30 October 2015 16: 16
          Both the tone and the argumentation are very much reminiscent of the State Department. "I have to leave because we want to." Sorry, won't the mug crack?
          1. +13
            30 October 2015 16: 35
            Quote: djqnbdjqnb
            Both tone and argument are very much reminiscent of the State Department.

            Remind. Only slows down in pure Arabic. Already in the State Department they realized that Russia will not give Assad, but to butt but not with your hands. And this one screams about the golden toilet, waving his wooden saber ...
            1. -14
              30 October 2015 16: 44
              Quote: Misha Honest
              I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"

              Army of saudi arabia - This is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider. If we consider the air force of this country, then we can say that this is a wide range of aircraft. This is about 100 squadrons represented by such machines as: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units), Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter(30 units) Panavia Tornado ADV (20 units), Panavia Tornado IDS (80 units) Eurofighter Typhoon (35 units)

              Ground Forces: Main Tanks - M1A2 (about 300 f.), M60A3 (approximately 500 units), AMX-30 (200 units) .... there are others.
              BMP M2A2 Bradley (400 units), BMP AMX-10 (approximately 500 units), also available LAV-90 и LAV-25.
              Of the ACS, the most common among the Saudis М109А2 155mm in the amount of 120 units.
              (I'm not talking about air defense, the Navy, etc., all take a long time to list)

              In addition, in S.A. There are Strategic Missile Forces that have liquid ballistic missiles DF-3 (a Chinese missile with a range of 2500 km.) with a conventional high-explosive warhead. About 110 missiles and 10 launchers. S.A. is considering the acquisition of advanced Chinese ballistic missiles DF-21 soon.

              PS

              As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia. Since there is no necessary number of military bases in this region to gain superiority. If the war began now, we would be bogged down in it, although it is possible that we won, but with losses.

              Again, I’m talking hypothetical, since to predict the outcome of such a war, where a bunch of variables gives a large number of different combinations of situations, it’s a thankless task. But for the good, Russia needs to have several military bases for various purposes in the Middle East. The situation requires it to protect national interests.
              1. +39
                30 October 2015 17: 10
                The power of the SA we are observing in Yemen. With such success, one can start betting when Riyadh falls.
                1. +4
                  30 October 2015 21: 08
                  Today, the SA announced the imminent end of the company in Yemen. So, purely for information. Although I personally support the Hussites, of course.
              2. +3
                30 October 2015 17: 12
                _Vladislav_

                Talk about nothing. (I'm glad that you calculated the combat power of the Saudis, and now please calculate the combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.) Even if you just count only the forces of our base in Latakia ...
                1. 0
                  30 October 2015 17: 16
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  _Vladislav_

                  Talk about nothing. (I'm glad that you calculated the combat power of the Saudis, and now please calculate the combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.) Even if you just count only the forces of our base in Latakia ...

                  Yes, where does the military power of Iran + Russia, as it’s just to understand that it’s enough for the Saudis to subscribe to.
                  So, calm down - no one will start the 3rd World War from behind Syria.
                  The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin and what is the position of Russia?
                  1. +3
                    30 October 2015 17: 24
                    Quote: atalef
                    Why did these negotiations begin and what is the position of Russia?

                    An interesting question, since negotiations begin, then there is the subject of the contract, who will get what and under what conditions
                    1. 0
                      30 October 2015 20: 29
                      So Assad has already expressed himself specifically on this - Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.
                      For example, after the Iraqi wars of the Bush family in the Gulf, American companies received oil contracts, but Russia forgave Iraq a debt (after it was sent from Washington).
                      And the price of oil, the control of the oil market - this is directly the way of life of the Saudis.
                      1. -1
                        30 October 2015 20: 44
                        Quote: Pilot bin-bom
                        Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.

                        In Syria, oil reserves are minuscule
                        And the output is extra. volumes (in the development of which it is still not so sickly to invest) it will only lower the price
                      2. +3
                        31 October 2015 15: 46
                        Quote: atalef
                        Quote: Pilot bin-bom
                        Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.

                        In Syria, oil reserves are minuscule
                        And the output is extra. volumes (in the development of which it is still not so sickly to invest) it will only lower the price



                        The main thing is that your friends (Qatar and other democratic monarchies) do not have access to the coast, and we have enough oil and gas !!! We block delivery routes and our product will be bought! This reason is already enough! hi
                  2. +10
                    30 October 2015 17: 36
                    Quote: Misha Honest
                    Even if you just count only the strength of our base in Latakia ...

                    12 Su-24M front-line bombers and Su-25SM attack aircraft, 6 Su-34 bombers, 4 Su-30SM fighters, as well as Mi-24 attack helicopters and Mi-17 multi-purpose helicopters
                    In Latakia, the base of the airborne forces is relatively small, it should be said that the need to expand the number of aircraft is also announced in our Ministry of Defense.

                    In addition, it is not correct to compare the effectiveness of conducting air strikes against terrorists (without appropriate air defense) and the likely armed conflict with the SA. Since the Saudis have medium-range air defense:
                    SAM MIM-104 PAC-2 "Patriot", 21 batteries.

                    The possibilities of an air group in Latakia for a war with the regular army of the SA are small (and this is mildly said). More military bases are needed, moreover, for various purposes - for these purposes.
                    Farther…..

                    Quote: Misha Honest
                    combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.

                    I still prefer to compare specifically the Russian Federation and the SA. By the fact that if it comes to, as you say, Iran + Russia, then it is appropriate to say that CA + USA. P.E. it is not correct. We compare specific potentials, and possible mutual damage.

                    PS
                    Do not get me wrong, I am not at all against the success of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the Syrian company, and indeed the military successes of the Russian Federation in the future (I'm even FOR). But, it’s kind of like a Military Review, and I’m somewhat annoyed that a comparison of the potentials of the countries and possible mutual damage did not find understanding here.
                    1. +6
                      30 October 2015 18: 08
                      that a comparison of the potentials of countries and possible mutual damage, here is not understood. ,,
                      do you think the site can’t use the search engine? all these flying tanks on paper, how many of them travel, fly, what kind of combat readiness? and how they can fight in Yemen can be seen. so you don’t even need to compare the SA and Russia.
                    2. +14
                      30 October 2015 18: 23
                      I will tell you one thing for sure: all their air defenses will "go blind" and not a single plane will rise, simply will not have time ... If tomorrow is war. Objectively. And with the destroyed oil infrastructure, this country will turn into a desert in a year or two. All these sheikhs will fall Great Britain will be ruled from there. Fortunately, the bridgehead has been prepared.
                    3. 0
                      31 October 2015 09: 35
                      I gave you a plus here and there. For the analysis (any) is more interesting than reading here "we will all the rags", for the sake of gaining pluses. It gives off as a "censor" sometimes, unfortunately.
                    4. +4
                      31 October 2015 22: 55
                      And, what, someone generally thinks (in the event of a conflict with the SA ... and, purely hypothetically, of course) that it will be necessary to land assault forces and overcome air defense request There will be enough cruise missiles with tactical ammunition. Delivery methods will be invented at the General Staff. Enough of these pleasantries with camel drivers. We don’t need their land, so it’s not necessary to land them. It’s enough to transfer them back to camels. We have enough debt for us for Russian blood.
                      As for the fact that a lot of people will fit in for them ... well, well ... they will sit quietly and pray to Alah that the wind does not blow in their direction ... Let us recall how many fit in for Mishiko and Gunpowder ... Well, squeals .. not the first time. Sanctions? So thank you for your kind words.
                  3. +6
                    30 October 2015 17: 38
                    atalef
                    The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin


                    Sdrast ... here it is just understandable .... because Russia fit in! wink
                  4. +5
                    31 October 2015 00: 17
                    Why so many words? Just look into these scared eyes in the photo.
                  5. 0
                    31 October 2015 07: 42
                    Quote: atalef
                    The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin
                    This is not a negotiation! Negotiations are the parties to the conflict and the mediators agree on something. This is an ordinary conspiracy, or a meeting (if you like) on the destruction of Syria, a clear attempt to interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state, a kind of club of "friends" of Syria. And Russia's position is known. Russia is helping Syria in repelling external and internal aggression.
                2. +14
                  30 October 2015 18: 38
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  Even if you just count only the strength of our base in Latakia ..
                  - Russia will not fight with Saudi Arabia - but, if it comes to business, then ... But how can it get to business? So: how much can you pretend that international terrorism in the person of all ISIS and Nusr is in itself, and Saudi Arabia in itself? Everyone already knows very well that all this riffraff is a stupidly foreign expeditionary legion of Saudis. Looks like complications went on with the Hussites - at the moment 500 Ishilites from Syria were thrown ... And they dutifully plunged into planes and went to fight on another front. It doesn’t look like rebels against the Syrian regime at all, but it looks like a mercenary army! I don’t really understand big politics - I see a hand that is trying to hit me, I am hitting it, while I smile at the owner of this hand and bow to it. The owner of the hand also pretends that the hand trying to hit me is not his and also politely smiles at me laughing laughing That's really nonsense !!! So, if it comes down to it - it is easier to make secret deliveries to the Houthis - and the Saudis will noticeably dry up their morale, and the desire to make themselves a "king of the region" will diminish.
              3. +12
                30 October 2015 17: 35
                If we consider the air force of this country, then we can say that this is a wide range of aircraft. This is the order of 100 squadrons represented by such machines as: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units),

                They listed all the equipment, but not a word about manpower! I watched the news here ...
                "According to intelligence, on October 26, 4 planes from Turkey arrived at the airport of the Yemeni city of Aden. Two of them belong to Turkish airlines, one to Qatari and another plane from the UAE airline. More than 500 militants of the Islamic State terrorist organization were on board. were taken out of Syria, saving them from Russian airstrikes, "said the official representative of the Syrian Armed Forces, Ali Mayhub.

                According to the Syrian general, the terrorists were taken out of the airport in three groups - one to Saudi Arabia and two to Yemen. Militants, according to Damascus, should join the so-called Saudi coalition. She suffered heavy losses in recent battles against the Yemeni rebels, who overthrew the country's president at the beginning of the year.


                So, the Syrian Armed Forces have been fighting for three years, and even with the help of the Russian air forces and went on the offensive, and these only got into Yemen and reinforcement is already required from ISIS.

                It’s not the technology that fights, but the people who control this technology.
              4. +4
                30 October 2015 17: 36
                _Vladislav
                hypothetical, the war against Saudi Arabia in Syria, for Russia would not be an easy task



                ..... and who is going to fight with the Saudis? .... Russians are in Syria for a month ..... and everything gradually rises ... from head ... to feet! ... or maybe someone was going to .... yes changed his mind ..... temporarily ??? !!! hi
              5. +3
                30 October 2015 17: 41
                The Saudis buy this technique first. The second is attacks on oil wells and industrial centers, if any, so far. Then you need to act like the Americans to disable logistics. That's somehow.
              6. +3
                30 October 2015 17: 53
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia.

                It's not enough to buy a bunch of even the latest technology on the planet. We need specialists to manage this, and not "parquet" warriors, but real professionals. In Saudi Arabia, they certainly exist, but their number is scanty.
                1. +1
                  30 October 2015 18: 42
                  It's not enough to buy a bunch of even the latest technology on the planet. We need specialists to manage this, and not "parquet" warriors, but real professionals. In Saudi Arabia, they certainly exist, but their number is scanty.


                  Good day!
                  There are mercenaries. There are a lot of them. Here in dill, for money from all over the world came together. And the Poles pilots, and snipers Poles, ameriko.sy, Lithuanians, etc. The main thing is dollars.
                  1. +1
                    30 October 2015 19: 04
                    Quote: I-Russian
                    The main thing is dollars.

                    And they helped a lot in Dill (mercenaries) ??))
                    Dollars are good when you can spend them.
                    And with a real batch, not against the Papuans, but against real strength, where your chances of survival are equal to the statistical error, 90% of all mercenaries will either scatter or switch to the other side.
                    1. +3
                      30 October 2015 19: 14
                      Quote: Ramzaj99
                      Quote: I-Russian
                      The main thing is dollars.

                      And they helped a lot in Dill ??))
                      Dollars are good when you can spend them.
                      And with a real batch, not against the Papuans, but against real strength, where your chances of survival are equal to the statistical error, 90% of all mercenaries will either scatter or switch to the other side.


                      I don't know in dill. In New Russia, many troubles have been done. Something not one has crossed. request
                      1. 0
                        30 October 2015 22: 52
                        Quote: I-Russian
                        Something not one crossed

                        Nobody took it seriously for them ...)))))
                        And let's not compare, the war within the state and the war between states ....
                  2. The comment was deleted.
              7. The comment was deleted.
              8. +10
                30 October 2015 18: 26
                The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.

                so wide that they can intercept a couple of dozen cruise missiles with nuclear warheads? or does someone naively think that Russia, in case of a threat to itself, will strike a symmetrical answer (if they have a knife in their hands, then we will only act with a knife)?

                And stop trying to scare us.
                We all saw very well how the Americans did it in Afghanistan. Someone will try to object "so the USSR did not achieve victory in Afghanistan."
                Then the United States stood behind the backs of the Mojahedin who fought with the USSR, and when the United States came to Afghanistan, neither Russia nor the USSR stood behind the backs of those with whom they fought.
                And still they managed it.
                1. +4
                  30 October 2015 19: 15
                  Firstly, I have never tried and do not try to prove that the armed forces of the SA are stronger than the RF Armed Forces. The Russian army is the second strongest in the world. And yes, Russia has so many nuclear weapons that the whole world can be smashed. But.....
                  Quote: lopvlad
                  so wide that they can intercept a couple of dozen cruise missiles with nuclear warheads? or someone naively thinks what if Russia threatens itself with a symmetrical response (if they have a knife in their hands, then we will only act with a knife)?


                  I am sure that in Georgia 08.08.08. several of our Tu-22 aircraft and four Su-25 units were shot down. Reason: The enemy has the so-called air defense middle hand Buk-M1.
                  I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                  It is also reliably known that S.A. medium air defense available.
                  It is reliably known that nuclear weapons are used in cases specified in the constitution of the Russian Federation. If we are talking about a threat to the territorial integrity of the country.
                  Or someone naively believes that Russia is ready to become a nuclear aggressor in recent history due to a couple of crashed aircraft.

                  I just urge you not to breed bravado, such as YES WE YES ENOUGH TO USE THE SCARK! I just - suggest thinking. Is it possible that the air defense, or the Saudi air force (in case of confrontation) could create a threat to our airborne forces.
                  And here I would be very interested to know the opinion of a person who has knowledge in this area. I heard that there are such people on this site.
                  1. +1
                    30 October 2015 21: 21
                    Quote: _Vladislav_
                    I am sure that in Georgia 08.08.08


                    then our army was in such a state as the Ukrainian in 2014 (well, except for the Strategic Missile Forces). We were then in frank .....
                    This was the rubicon after which it was decided to create the RT channel and begin the rearmament of the army.
                    Moreover, a real large-scale rearmament of the army began only in 2013.

                    Quote: _Vladislav_
                    I just urge you not to breed bravado


                    no one spreads bravado but simply talks about real fighting efficiency instead of "See how much Saudi Arabia has"

                    Quote: _Vladislav_
                    Or someone naively believes that Russia is ready to become a nuclear aggressor in recent history due to a couple of crashed aircraft.


                    I suppose. But those who thought that Russia would not answer because of the pair of killed peacekeepers in 2008 were severely broken off.
                    And remember that an attack on the armed forces of Russia is automatically an attack on Russia. Even the Americans understand this and therefore have a dialogue with the Russian military as they understand that due to a couple of fallen aircraft in the sky of Syria, the third world war can begin.
                  2. 0
                    31 October 2015 03: 16
                    Quote: _Vladislav_
                    I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                    Do not fly, fly with a conventional warhead. And they will fly where necessary.
                    1. 0
                      31 October 2015 10: 10
                      Quote: Garris199
                      Quote: _Vladislav_
                      I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                      Do not fly, fly with a conventional warhead. And they will fly where necessary.

                      Exactly, there (as well as in Qatar) a couple of oil / gas loading terminals can be set on fire, for example (this does not require a special warfare unit) - it will be fun for everyone. And for this IMHO enough "caliber" with 450kg of TNT. Well, or several.
                      No one doubts that they fly as they should.
                      The question is - do we need it?
              9. +3
                30 October 2015 19: 14
                Arab troops, they can only speak at the parade, they snickered there, if you throw something small to the Yemenis, the situation will change dramatically
              10. +1
                30 October 2015 19: 42
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                Quote: Misha Honest
                I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"

                Army of saudi arabia - This is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider. If we consider the air force of this country, then we can say that this is a wide range of aircraft. This is about 100 squadrons represented by such machines as: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units), Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter(30 units) Panavia Tornado ADV (20 units), Panavia Tornado IDS (80 units) Eurofighter Typhoon (35 units)

                Ground Forces: Main Tanks - M1A2 (about 300 f.), M60A3 (approximately 500 units), AMX-30 (200 units) .... there are others.
                BMP M2A2 Bradley (400 units), BMP AMX-10 (approximately 500 units), also available LAV-90 и LAV-25.
                Of the ACS, the most common among the Saudis М109А2 155mm in the amount of 120 units.
                (I'm not talking about air defense, the Navy, etc., all take a long time to list)

                In addition, in S.A. There are Strategic Missile Forces that have liquid ballistic missiles DF-3 (a Chinese missile with a range of 2500 km.) with a conventional high-explosive warhead. About 110 missiles and 10 launchers. S.A. is considering the acquisition of advanced Chinese ballistic missiles DF-21 soon.

                PS

                As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia. Since there is no necessary number of military bases in this region to gain superiority. If the war began now, we would be bogged down in it, although it is possible that we won, but with losses.

                Again, I’m talking hypothetical, since to predict the outcome of such a war, where a bunch of variables gives a large number of different combinations of situations, it’s a thankless task. But for the good, Russia needs to have several military bases for various purposes in the Middle East. The situation requires it to protect national interests.

                Dear in the USSR, a plan was also developed for bombing the military and economic targets of the SA. Their army is fleeing before a serious and not serious adversary. (In Yemen, for example) The reason is the rich people who want to die. Let these desert camels know their place, otherwise we will drive them into the Stone Age instantly and they will have democracy!
              11. -2
                30 October 2015 20: 50
                Russian nuclear warheads of 1500 pieces. The radius of the lesion is the solar system.
              12. -1
                30 October 2015 21: 03
                I didn’t understand, but why did Vladislav’s comrades go awry? The whole person explained well, honestly, in detail and with the necessary patriotic bias. And what do you want, comrades, a post about us throwing Saudites with caps and buried in the sand?
                1. 0
                  31 October 2015 01: 29
                  Saudi Arabia win men in training. What are you talking about?
              13. +2
                30 October 2015 21: 16
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.

                if you strike airstrike on the oil fields of CA and Qatar, what will they have left there? and what will be the price of oil?
              14. +2
                30 October 2015 21: 22
                They really have a lot of toys. It’s their tradition to buy a lot and all at once. But do they know how to play them?
                1. 0
                  31 October 2015 03: 39
                  but can they play them?

                  They know how to play, but only in words.
              15. +1
                30 October 2015 22: 09
                About the SA SA can already definitely be said, it's like guarding the Vatican with Swiss arrows. There is a lot of pomposity, but zero sense. How many successful operations did the Saudi secret services carry out? You can even recall the murder during the liberation and hostages. They fight for money, and the Syrians for the country. It seems like this.
              16. The comment was deleted.
              17. 0
                31 October 2015 04: 09
                The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.
                it can be seen how they defeated in Yemen!
              18. 0
                31 October 2015 20: 06
                As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia.


                People are fighting, and Saudi Arabia has problems with this. A high standard of living does not strongly call for the self-sacrifice of citizens of the country, unlike the Syrians who will go to the end (they simply have no choice left), and without this they won’t be able to win the war.
            2. +3
              30 October 2015 19: 02
              If the Saudis did not understand that Russia had not gotten involved in this viper, this tangle of relations, then let them understand that Russia, to put it mildly, will wipe their ass off and act as they see fit. And they will have to reckon with this, no matter how they decide, but we don’t change our decisions - this is not discussed, we will consider it an axiom ...
              1. -3
                30 October 2015 21: 06
                Quote: voronbel53
                If the Saudis didn’t understand that Russia wasn’t getting involved in this viper,

                It’s a pity that they didn’t hear Lavrov’s speech now.
                Independent elections with the participation of all Syrian citizens, regardless of their residence (words of Lavrov) - forget about Assad.
            3. 0
              31 October 2015 04: 54
              Only he shouts, rather, not "o", but "on" the golden toilet.
              And the toilet - as usual - in the toilet ...
              In short, it's time to drench.
          2. -1
            30 October 2015 17: 38
            So him the text for the speech and dashed off in the State Department
          3. +3
            30 October 2015 21: 19
            And this is true, it means that the American ophthalmologist Assad was unable to bend under themselves, and the proud Arab sheikhs, the proud lords of deserts and oil, long ago bent over and took a comfortable pose.
            And they still dare to say something? Who are they?
      2. +9
        30 October 2015 16: 21
        This group of gruffles in camouflage robes, instead of clothes, will exclusively look on the path leading to the mother’s mother! am
      3. +8
        30 October 2015 16: 29
        Quote: Misha Honest
        I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"

        Quote: Sveles
        Chezh did not remove it before?

        enough health to remove Assad ?!
        this is not a story with Muammar Gaddafi (unfortunately at that time he did not have a "strong shoulder" of Russia).
        otherwise, some emirs and others like them may die "from heart failure" ...
      4. 0
        30 October 2015 16: 41
        Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister said Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"

        Seen newspapers do not read the disease! smile

        WSJ: "Obama administration is ready to support the transition period led by Assad for several months or longer"

        Or longer! bully
      5. +6
        30 October 2015 17: 06
        They are vomiting before, one salvo at their oil refining and also oil fields and all again will be herds of camels, imagined themselves not to understand who the Shepherds were.
        1. 0
          30 October 2015 17: 24
          Their economy is not only oil production, but also the world's largest financial center, and by blows to oil fields we will only raise the price per barrel.
          1. +1
            31 October 2015 01: 31
            They have no economy. 90% is oil.
      6. 0
        30 October 2015 17: 11
        Quote: Sveles
        Chezh did not remove it before?

        And for such rhetoric, the Saudis did not previously have sanction from the black ruler.
        The State Department, in connection with the obvious successes of the Russian Aerospace Forces, is no longer able to say such a thing, but completely along with the allies.
        Not at all surprised, considering who are the main sponsors of world terrorism (states and saudas). If only the shameful Saudi printers with tones of meta in luggage would not have fired yet. so would pass for respected people.
      7. 0
        30 October 2015 18: 48
        Quote: Sveles
        Chezh did not remove it before?


        He himself is not afraid to drown in a gold toilet bowl inadvertently ??? And then we urgently need to talk about democracy there. To prove that she is not there ... like two fingers ... Maybe you need to help the oppressed people with your cruise missiles ??? Or will the "free world" not appreciate it again?
      8. 0
        31 October 2015 04: 07
        what a brave man!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +13
      30 October 2015 15: 46
      Quote: Misha Honest
      al jubeyr

      And what is there to be surprised. His education is classically "Studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982 he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984 - a master's degree in international relations at Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So mattress makers raised him in their own image and likeness
      1. +28
        30 October 2015 15: 55
        And it is not easier to tell us to the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is a country that does not take into account human rights, applying medieval punishments in the form of "stoning", "chopping off hands", etc.
        There have never been any elections there, and in general they behave far NOT democratically ...

        In comparison with them, my esteemed Bashar al-Assad - an angel in the flesh and the main democrat, God forgive me, the Middle East!
        1. +5
          30 October 2015 16: 41
          Quote: Gxash
          But it’s not easier to tell us the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is a country, disregarding human rights, using medieval punishments in the form of "stoning", "chopping off hands", etc.
          There have never been any elections there, and in general they behave far NOT democratically ...

          And it’s not easier to tell us to the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is NOT a country at all, but a bunch of oil-fed Bedouins, who understood everything about yachts and golden toilet bowls, and stayed to twist their camels with their heads.
      2. +5
        30 October 2015 16: 16
        Quote: Wend

        And what is there to be surprised. His education is classically "Studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982 he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984 - a master's degree in international relations at Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So mattress makers raised him in their own image and likeness
        Where the venerable information.
        By the number of completed institutions and titles in front of us is a luminosum overgrown with moss, a storehouse of wisdom, so to speak. laughing
        But Lavrov proved the opposite in two words.
        Maybe the petrodollars studied for it, as is customary there, more pathos and peacock feathers, maybe it’s a ride, but for some reason it never rolls. what
        1. +1
          30 October 2015 16: 26
          Quote: Andrea
          Quote: Wend

          And what is there to be surprised. His education is classically "Studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982 he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984 - a master's degree in international relations at Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So mattress makers raised him in their own image and likeness
          Where the venerable information.

          Yes, on the Internet I looked at information about this minister.
          1. +2
            30 October 2015 16: 47
            Vend
            The question was rhetorical, of course, I myself watched there
        2. +3
          30 October 2015 16: 37
          Yeah, the sheikh is the correspondence! wassat
      3. avg
        +6
        30 October 2015 16: 38
        Quote: Wend
        He has a classical education

        We know, we know how such children learn ... It is from this "education" that they have a "peacock ambition" laughing
      4. +1
        30 October 2015 16: 45
        Something he reminded me of Comrade Saakashvili.
    4. +27
      30 October 2015 15: 47
      Either the head of the Saudi Arabian Foreign Ministry will shut up, or they will have to help the Hussites.
    5. +10
      30 October 2015 15: 48

      The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated approximately like this: and who, in fact, is this al-Jubeyr
      Damn damn it.
      You look at the face and for sure.
      And yet ... the executioner in Arabia cries for him there, I heard fagots are executed. am
      1. +4
        30 October 2015 15: 52
        Either he (Assad - a comment. "VO") will go into the political process, or it will have to remove the force.

        Itself sits in a shroud, and all there too - to threaten!
    6. +2
      30 October 2015 15: 52
      Wildly sorry, but the arabchik looks like Yarmolnik)))
      1. +4
        30 October 2015 15: 58
        Assad will not leave ... Until order is restored! And the point ...
        1. 0
          30 October 2015 17: 45
          Assad will not leave ... Until order is restored! And the point ... Assad, I think will go away... Russia is important not Assad, but Syria. There is a necessary leader ... PC Personal opinion ...
    7. +2
      30 October 2015 15: 55
      They are there choimmortal?
      1. avt
        +6
        30 October 2015 16: 20
        Quote: Prapor-527
        They are there, immortal?

        Nope. Lavrov already gave them a description at a meeting with them under video cameras - "Morons bld!" laughingThis is to say the least, if they got a real diplomat accustomed to everything. laughing
        1. +4
          30 October 2015 16: 27
          "... he said everything!" am There is nothing to add to Lavrov’s energetic statement. hi
        2. +2
          30 October 2015 17: 23
          Quote: avt
          ,, Morons bld! "

          Immortal morons bld? wassat
          1. avt
            0
            31 October 2015 10: 45
            Quote: Prapor-527
            Immortal morons bld?

            More likely hereditary.
    8. +2
      30 October 2015 16: 08
      Quote: Misha Honest
      I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"

      Well, what are you?
      He expressed the idea that the Americans cannot openly voice, that's all. Now it will be even more interesting, because it is through the SA that the Americans send anti-tank systems to moderate thugs ...........
      1. 0
        30 October 2015 16: 31
        It seems that the foreign ministers of some countries gathered for a thieves ’meeting and are judged by concepts. It is time for the Saudis to democratize themselves, not only have snickered, they are also organizing genocide, they are financing terrorists and supporting the drug business. It’s time for the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation to raise the issue of regimes and states supporting and financing fascists, terrorists and other criminal organizations. It is impossible to maintain relations with such countries, isolation is at least.
    9. +2
      30 October 2015 16: 25
      He was given the command "Fas!", So he barks.
    10. +1
      30 October 2015 16: 32
      "Risk your health?"

      Yes, of course not, the point is not iron. It's just that these guys have completely lost their minds from petrodollars. what
    11. +1
      30 October 2015 16: 47
      interesting, but he himself is not afraid that the next revolution of dates will be in Saudi Arabia!?
    12. +6
      30 October 2015 17: 00
      we’ll also come to the Saudis if they continue to spread this infection
    13. 0
      30 October 2015 20: 36
      Better wish him good luck! and also give the flag in your hands, stick the propeller in the ass and let KAMAZ meet. something like this
    14. 0
      30 October 2015 20: 38
      he or she or it))) will not risk !!!
    15. +1
      30 October 2015 20: 51
      Quote: Misha Honest
      I just want to ask Comrade Jubeir: "Are you risking your health?"



      Not a brother, not a friend to us ...
      1. 0
        31 October 2015 06: 37
        something this joe beir doesn’t look like a saudita ... especially when worried lol
    16. 0
      31 October 2015 09: 25
      The Saudis are also Semites. Because of them, just, you can expect anything, that's just to the embrasure, they themselves are somehow not very ... Here are others to incite for a "good" cause, always with their pleasure.
  2. +7
    30 October 2015 15: 40
    By stolen from the Americans - stupid people! fool
  3. +11
    30 October 2015 15: 41
    Either he (Assad - a comment. "VO") will go into the political process, or it will have to remove the force.
    Well then, you have two prospects, either you can succeed or not ... But it just seems to me that it will be FRAWN.
    1. Tor5
      +1
      30 October 2015 17: 06
      I believe that the applicant himself did not understand what he said. He simply yelled, thinking that he was falling into the stream ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +7
    30 October 2015 15: 42
    Well, let them try, bedding mattress. And they didn’t think about the consequences, the heroes are bad ...
    1. +8
      30 October 2015 15: 53
      His words are just the squeal of a jackal. History has shown that S. Arabia is militarily complete zero.
  5. +10
    30 October 2015 15: 42
    Did you sniff Cox? First, let them stop chopping and stoning their heads, and then only talk about what kind of "bloody" regime Assad established in Syria. Only the Syrians can decide what kind of power they will have and who will be the head of state!
    1. +3
      30 October 2015 16: 17
      It’s necessary to send him to the drug test ... and the results of the Sharia’s trial to the SA ... then we'll see how he sings
  6. +13
    30 October 2015 15: 43
    The navel will unleash the son of a camel.
  7. dsi
    +5
    30 October 2015 15: 43
    that “Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States

    The primary concern for the United States is the disappearance of Russia from the world map forever.
    1. +3
      30 October 2015 15: 57
      The primary task of all mankind is the disappearance of mattress from planet Earth .. and no closer than Alpha Centauri ..... Unhappy humanoids ...
      Quote: dsi
      that “Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States

      The primary concern for the United States is the disappearance of Russia from the world map forever.
  8. +8
    30 October 2015 15: 44
    Heck! I realized exclusivity is contagious .... wassat
  9. +11
    30 October 2015 15: 44
    It can be seen that the Saudis, as well as their beloved camels, the situation in the outside world only reaches the seventh day, and even then with distortions ... Shoigu, still the best diplomat for the Middle East!
  10. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 45
    It is clear that while Syria and Assad are under our care, no one will even rock the boat! All talk is another bluff!
    1. 0
      30 October 2015 18: 02
      Rokossovsky
      it’s obvious that while Syria and Assad are under our care, no one will even rock the boat



      ..... that's just the time .... to talk! hi
  11. +9
    30 October 2015 15: 45
    But what does Comrade Lavrov think about this? - asked Joseph Vissarionovich, puffing his pipe ...
  12. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 46
    And if you push the IS from Syria to the Saudis? Do not completely remove, but simply transfer ...
  13. +10
    30 October 2015 15: 46
    The dude with his eyes down with his threat is a little late, I think. At least, it is clearly not for him to talk about "strength".
    1. +12
      30 October 2015 15: 52
      Quote: Das Boot
      The dude with his eyes down with his threat is a little late, I think. At least, it is clearly not for him to talk about "strength".

      So here it is, over shouting loudly and beating yourself in the chest with your fist otherwise they will think that you are weak wink
      1. +3
        30 October 2015 15: 57
        So here it is, over shouting loudly and beating yourself in the chest with your fist otherwise they will think that you are weak

        Yes, even shouting loudly, even babbling in a whisper, things do not change. It’s not for them to talk about the strength of our VKS in Syria. And I think they will not leave there until everything, including the political process, is over and leaves the rear to the Saudis.
        1. +4
          30 October 2015 16: 02
          Quote: DenZ
          Yes, even shouting loudly, even babbling in a whisper, things do not change. It’s not for them to talk about strength while our VKS in Syria

          Yes, that's not the point. The Saudis have fun military construction. Epic lottery, kickbacks and cuts. With their military budget comparable to ours - in theory there should be a better army in the region. But in reality - somewhat, to put it mildly, not so.
          1. +1
            30 October 2015 16: 10
            Yes, that's not the point. The Saudis have fun military construction. Epic lottery, kickbacks and cuts. With their military budget comparable to ours - in theory there should be a better army in the region. But in reality - somewhat, to put it mildly, not so.

            About the state of the Saudi army, everything is clear here, But even with this state, they are a serious opponent to Syria, assuming that the Russian Air Force is not in Syria. But they are there, for now, I do not think that the Saudis will get in there (although, perhaps, they can climb in order to fuel the situation almost before the start of World War 3 with the filing of friends from behind a puddle).
  14. +7
    30 October 2015 15: 46
    Is it about him that Lavrov said "stupid people .. bl # qb"?
  15. +6
    30 October 2015 15: 46
    and who, in fact, is this al-Jubeir, who decided that he has some right to speak out about the forceful deposition of the leader of a foreign state?

    It is interesting if Lavrov would ask this Jubeyr question exactly in this wording what would be the answer?
  16. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 47
    as they say, a flag in your hands and a drum in your teeth. Pi ...... don’t roll bags.
  17. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 47
    And this foreign minister did not think about when the royal dynasty of the Saudis, these fundamental assassinations of the United States, would be dismissed ??!
  18. Don
    +2
    30 October 2015 15: 48
    What about today's missile launches? Who knows what, enlighten!
  19. +8
    30 October 2015 15: 48
    The prince of a deserted gas station made a statement that in the last century was tantamount to a declaration of war ...
  20. +7
    30 October 2015 15: 49
    It would be better if they thought how to get out of Yemen, otherwise they will break all your teeth.
  21. +6
    30 October 2015 15: 49
    And this is not a prince caught with two tons of drugs?
    1. +15
      30 October 2015 15: 57
      And Allah will take them apart, there are these pricks like frogs in a swamp, who got an oil rig and a prince put a sheet on his head.
  22. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 53
    Standard situation: America and the Saudis play the game good and bad.Nothing new as they say, the Saudis portray themselves as such independent and kind of evil, and at the same time they want to ward off suspicion from the Americans in an unscrupulous game against Syria.
    Say that they will succeed - it’s a lie, but they can thoroughly pat their nerves. There is one question, as they say - whose eggs will be stronger both politically and militarily.
  23. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 55
    Assad’s departure will save not Syria, but Saudi Arabia. Yes, and Iran will add problems. So, let this comrade go to the forest .... and away. wassat
  24. +6
    30 October 2015 15: 56
    Dumb Minister.
  25. +3
    30 October 2015 15: 57
    No one will ask the Saudis, they would sit there and sniff better, the bumps on the level place of the Christmas tree ..
  26. 0
    30 October 2015 15: 58
    Today they wrote what happened two weeks ago
  27. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 58
    Does the person with the eyes of the addict have something to say to us?
    You, dear, it’s better not to get out from under your turban. Sit there in your cozy little world and think that you are the ruler of the world, and the World will somehow live without your thoughts.
    In general, everything according to the unforgettable Krylov is Ay, Moska, she is strong to know, barks at an elephant.
  28. +5
    30 October 2015 15: 58
    People who do not know the word "no" from infancy are dangerous to those around them. Striped ears are also the same, they found each other. IMHO, when this Al-Jubeir recalls how many of his favorite green papers were turned into smoke by the Russian Aerospace Forces, and all because of this Assad, anger gurgles in his throat and overshadows his mind (if he ever existed).
  29. +1
    30 October 2015 16: 03
    Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister said Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"
    Come on, Europe has already had Hussein and Gaddafi. Almost sob!
  30. +4
    30 October 2015 16: 03
    Whose cow would moan ... "clean" mouthpiece of the United States and in general it looks like a blue one. wassat
  31. yan 2015
    +2
    30 October 2015 16: 04
    in this matter it is very important not to make a mistake. I would advise the Saudis to measure seven times .. and eight and nine .. well, to make no mistake. because we will not measure. we will measure the time for this kingdom.
  32. win
    +4
    30 October 2015 16: 05
    and who, in fact, is this al-Jubair


    The question should be shirche - what kind of country Saudi Arabia?

    Here rabbits were brought to Australia, they got divorced ...

    And pigs were brought to New Zealand.

    An instructive historical experience.

    And if you bring to the Arabian Peninsula ...?
  33. +3
    30 October 2015 16: 05
    So I want to take and ... Caliber in places of oil production SA.
  34. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 05
    But can he remove by force the King of Saudi Arabia Salman and the entire Al Saud dynasty?
  35. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 06
    So young, and as much mind as the senile McCain! laughing What is it they all have the same diagnosis - idiocy !? what
  36. +4
    30 October 2015 16: 07
    The young man smoked a hookah and issued a thesis. The fact that he concurrently someone at KSA fundamentally does not change anything would be sorted out with Yemen first, maybe then he would have listened to the opinion. Only it is unlikely
  37. +3
    30 October 2015 16: 07
    He can clean only for Obama, and then, if he permits!
  38. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 10
    "... since when did diplomacy in a number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, begin to consider it their competence, the right or wrong choice was made by the citizens of Syria? ...
    "Morons b..t!", Including the same Saudi Arabia!
  39. +6
    30 October 2015 16: 12
    Hmm ... Comrade. Minister, and what, "strength" has grown?))
  40. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 12
    Isn't he pi-rock by chance? what
  41. +1
    30 October 2015 16: 16
    Having read all the comments addressed to him, this Saudi would probably have been cut off from anger that he said such nonsense. If he doesn’t worry, he is not very different from some talkers.
  42. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 16
    The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated something like this: and who, in fact, is this al-Jubairwho decided that he has some right to speak out about the forceful removal of the leader of a foreign state?

    Some strange sentences-answers with phrases are formed in my head: "How long ago, my dear, did I wipe myself with dung, that you teach others"; "Does the hoop put a lot of pressure on the brain?"; "American litter" ...
    In a word, let the ears of this Saracen go by ... negative
  43. +4
    30 October 2015 16: 17
    The dog barks, the wind wears.
    1. +2
      30 October 2015 18: 10
      Quote: kizhe
      The dog barks, the wind wears.

      And the Syrian caravan is coming ...
  44. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 23
    And he orally raped someone .. Now he opened his mouth for some reason.
  45. +1
    30 October 2015 16: 24
    We must understand the reasons for such a sharp collision. They swelled billions into this igilovskaya riffraff, and now the money has gone through ... if, and all this human rubbish with weapons and hollowed brains has popped back. And dumping for oil went to dust, they themselves almost went downwind. That rages ....
  46. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 24
    Does this freaked news not read? Doesn’t watch TV? Doesn’t look out the window?
    I have never met a man who so desperately wants to destroy his country ...
  47. +5
    30 October 2015 16: 25
    They are brothers, here and there, one person, just some kind of movie. wassat
    1. +1
      30 October 2015 16: 45
      Quote: ivan bogomolov
      They are brothers, here and there, one person, just some kind of movie. wassat

      But really, as if one face, a different make-up, watch it for sure more.
      1. 0
        30 October 2015 17: 59
        Sibbars
        But really, as if one face


        ... so from a test tube .... they have one test tube for all the PSS .. laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  48. +6
    30 October 2015 16: 29
    It seems to me alone or he really looks like .... this Al-Jubeir, the "vampire" of the east)))
    1. +2
      30 October 2015 16: 31
      Ah ,,, HA .... I’ll shave myself right now, well, just one face ....))))))))) laughing
  49. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 31
    Meanwhile, the militant rhetoric of a Saudi official is not shared (or pretended not to be) in Washington. The day before, US officials said that "Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States."

    It's just that the guys from the Washington Regional Committee decided that it was necessary in the eyes of the "world community" to correct their image.
    And then their radicalism is beginning to be very embarrassing.
    Therefore, they gave the floor to a comrade from Riad.
  50. +3
    30 October 2015 16: 32
    How would the Saudis react if someone did not like the monarchy in their country. More reminiscent of the threat of declaring war on Syria.
  51. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 37
    Meanwhile, the light elves merge and merge:
    The US Embassy in Moscow is ready to consider applications for US visas from residents of Crimea. US Ambassador to the Russian Federation John Tefft announced this today, RIA Novosti reports.

    https://russian.rt.com/article/126899
  52. 0
    30 October 2015 16: 38
    It seems to me that the Americans are selecting princes for themselves. As they say, flesh of the flesh.
    He also considers himself chosen by God.
  53. +1
    30 October 2015 16: 54
    Or maybe it’s time to remove the chief Saudi too?
  54. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 57
    Oh, who is this strong guy here? Who got into a fight? You, my friend, first crawl out of Yemen alive, then we’ll see laughing
  55. +2
    30 October 2015 16: 58
    This Arab-Palestinian porridge is mixed so coolly that you could break a spoon in this stew. The East is not only a delicate matter, but also a bloody one!
  56. +1
    30 October 2015 17: 07
    It’s better for these figures wrapped in sheets to keep quiet, otherwise they won’t have to herd camels in the desert again.
  57. 0
    30 October 2015 17: 28
    The Saudis are the criminals themselves. They are always funding all sorts of scoundrels. Any scoundrel who starts cutting off heads, chopping off hands and carrying out terrorist attacks while exclaiming “Allahu Akbar!” is perceived by them as a true Muslim, friend and brother.
  58. His
    0
    30 October 2015 17: 50
    Folk traditions, reminiscent of something
  59. +1
    30 October 2015 18: 02
    The king of Saudi Arabia must go.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. win
      +2
      30 October 2015 19: 03
      the king of saudi arabia must go


      Yes, the king is sick and already insane.
      The eldest son rules there and one of the younger ones helps him.
      And the rest are in opposition.
      In general - mouse fuss...
  60. +1
    30 October 2015 18: 07
    The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.

    If the possibilities are so wide, why couldn’t they themselves and the Amers signed up for it?
    Or maybe he himself should leave - Foreign Minister al-Jubeir??
  61. 0
    30 October 2015 18: 21
    Well, quite in the style of the royal family.
    Only now you can choke on desire.
    The Saudi army is nothing at all.
    Although...Although ISIS will not attack the Saudis.
    Mattresses will not be allowed wassat
  62. +2
    30 October 2015 18: 23
    -I wonder, does this prince know what to do if a nuclear mushroom is larger than your thumb at arm's length?
    -I think yes! Because they are already walking in the savannah!
  63. 0
    30 October 2015 18: 29
    Uhhu...
    Iraq has already been “saved.” Libya was "saved".

    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/730/ximc268.png
  64. 0
    30 October 2015 19: 09
    Why shake the air?
  65. 0
    30 October 2015 19: 29
    Judging by the sad look of this subject, not everything is going well in his homeland. They have written more than once about internal squabbles in the royal family. They claim that soon they will no longer have time for Syria. How to save one’s skin and what one has acquired through back-breaking labor, rather than worrying about Assad’s fate.
  66. 0
    30 October 2015 19: 30
    Is that enough strength? The monarchs have become insolent, oh, they have become insolent. Peace to the huts, war to the palaces! Dress up their palaces in the Empire style or in the Amin style (whichever is more desirable) sad
  67. +1
    30 October 2015 20: 46
    Suppose, what if you create an idea in opposition to ISIS, like “purification of Islam” or something similar, invest money. In my opinion there will be a result. Although this is a diagram of mattress pads
    1. 0
      30 October 2015 20: 52
      good "For true Islam!" and go ahead! Fight fire with fire. Doesn't this even occur to anyone in the office? The idea is wonderful.
  68. 0
    30 October 2015 20: 49
    Is that enough strength? Otherwise the breeze will blow and scatter your country to the wind.
  69. 0
    30 October 2015 21: 13
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Pilot bin-bom
    Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.

    In Syria, oil reserves are minuscule
    And the output is extra. volumes (in the development of which it is still not so sickly to invest) it will only lower the price


    Militants of the Islamic State terrorist group, banned in a number of countries, including Russia, have recaptured a key oil field from government troops in Syria, Xinhua reports.

    According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, after fierce fighting, the Al-Jazal field in central Syria came under the control of terrorists. It was the last oil field in the country that was controlled by the Assad government.

    The government has previously lost oil and gas fields, including the country's largest field in northern Syria, which is now controlled by Kurdish militants
  70. 0
    30 October 2015 21: 25
    The ass, Emir, won’t crack, clean it up, then?
  71. +1
    30 October 2015 21: 28
    The Joker that Kerry pulled out of his sleeve. It seems that the Saudis have long been waging a proxy war against the USSR - Russia. Isn't it time to start paying back the sheikhs' debts?
  72. 0
    30 October 2015 21: 28
    Where the horse hoofs, the crayfish goes with its claws!
    Another superpower has emerged... True, modest Yemen recently destroyed their airbase with a Russian Scud. And SA wiped off...
    And it will wipe off again, for sure. If he persists, we will greatly upset him. As they said in our yard:
    - One more beep from your platform and your dental composition will move.
  73. +1
    30 October 2015 21: 49
    I think a dozen “Calibers” can noticeably cool down the ardor of hot Saudi boys (if urgently necessary). They walk well without pants, so they won’t need to wash their trousers. Otherwise, they’ve gotten very loose.
  74. 0
    30 October 2015 21: 55
    Maybe our specialists can clean up these camel hunters themselves??? Or provide assistance to Al Quds Force in this?!!
  75. 0
    30 October 2015 22: 23
    Quote: kill the fascist
    It’s better for these figures wrapped in sheets to keep quiet, otherwise they won’t have to herd camels in the desert again.

    Kadyrov and "Vostok" to Saudi Arabia, at the exit there is another Russian beach.
  76. 0
    30 October 2015 22: 27
    After such words or knowing about such a position, the combat power of the Russian Armed Forces was demonstrated.
    How will this work? We will find out in two weeks in the same Vienna.
    There is always hope for understanding.
  77. 0
    30 October 2015 23: 13
    Anwar Sadat was elected by the people and only the people can re-elect him. The USA, Saudi Arabia and their satellites are crawling like pigs into places where everything was calm when they were not there. Let them decide who will be their president. As the Russian representative to the UN once said correctly in relation to Qatar, when they began to attack it and teach it to live, that tomorrow only one memory will be left of this country. This, by the way, applies to Saudi Arabia and others like this. I don’t understand why Russia goes to such meetings. Syria is a member of the UN. And these decisions must be made within the walls of this international organization. It is useless for the USA, the EEC and others to do anything. How many times have they violated agreements? Why do we stubbornly step on the same “rake”?
  78. 0
    31 October 2015 01: 17
    The Saudi guy talks like an immortal, but...
  79. 0
    31 October 2015 01: 22
    Irresponsible statements by a Saudi diplomat could undermine the well-being of S. Arabia itself. Such a managerial attitude towards Syria, which is protected by Russia, could cost the Saudis dearly. Tremble, camel princes! Your antics throughout the Middle East are beyond patience!
  80. 0
    31 October 2015 03: 13
    Baaah, the miracle in the dress calls for oil at 200.
  81. 0
    31 October 2015 04: 22
    Each mongrel considers it his duty to bark from the gateway. They became emboldened and began to “cast” their votes incomprehensibly? Why is dill still silent? Remember - Russia is coming back!!!!!! in 10 years you will be standing in line for permission to speak your mind.
  82. +1
    31 October 2015 07: 13
    Looking at this little foreign minister with the eyes of a woman or a child, I want to say:
    “Do you need to take on this? The United States has always been able to flee in time or abandon its companions if its heels begin to smoke.
    And how long will the Saudis hold out after this mess even if Iran is against their will...??? :)
  83. 0
    1 November 2015 11: 09
    We can start an operation in Riyadh, if necessary. Iran will provide a bridgehead.