Saudi Foreign Minister said that Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"

Head of Saudi delegation to the Vienna meeting of the Syrian Foreign Minister al-Dzhubeyr spoke about his vision of solving the Syrian crisis. According Dzhubeyra, the only thing "save Syria," Assad is leaving the post of president. "BBC" conveys the statement of the Saudi minister, who expresses obvious radicalism:


Either he (Assad - a comment. "VO") will go into the political process, or it will have to remove the force.


Saudi Foreign Minister said that Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"


The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated like this: Who, in fact, is this Al Dzhubeyr who decides that he has some right to speak about the power shift leader of a foreign country? Anyway, since when diplomacy in a number of countries, including the same Saudi Arabia, began to consider its competence, the right or wrong choice was made by citizens of Syria? To get started in their own country at least some elections are held, and only because the Syrians to make comments ...

Meanwhile, the militant rhetoric of a Saudi official is not shared (or pretended not to be shared) in Washington. On the eve of the representatives of the US government said that "the departure of Assad from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States." It seems that the primary task for the United States is to continue the bloodshed in Syria while preserving the sources of destabilization with Assad or without Assad ...
Photos used:
www.sra7h.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

173 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Misha Honest 30 October 2015 15: 39 New
    • 95
    • 0
    +95
    One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"
    1. Sweles 30 October 2015 15: 43 New
      • 26
      • 0
      +26
      Chezh did not remove it before?
      1. EGOrkka 30 October 2015 15: 56 New
        • 51
        • 0
        +51
        Sweles
        Chezh did not remove it before?


        ...не шмогла....шмогла тока до Януковича....потому как хохлы самые тупые... laughing
        1. djqnbdjqnb 30 October 2015 16: 16 New
          • 39
          • 0
          +39
          Both tone and argument are very much reminiscent of the State Department. "Must leave because we want to." Sorry, but harya not crack?
          1. Zoldat_A 30 October 2015 16: 35 New
            • 13
            • 0
            +13
            Quote: djqnbdjqnb
            Both tone and argument are very much reminiscent of the State Department.

            Remind. Only slows down in pure Arabic. Already in the State Department they realized that Russia will not give Assad, but to butt but not with your hands. And this one screams about the golden toilet, waving his wooden saber ...
            1. _Vladislav_ 30 October 2015 16: 44 New
              • -14
              • 0
              -14
              Quote: Misha Honest
              One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"

              Army of saudi arabia – это не Катар, ее возможности значительно шире. Если рассмотреть ВВС этой страны, то можно сказать что это широкий спектр летательных аппаратов. Это порядка 100 эскадрилий представленный такими машинами как: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units), Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter(30 units) Panavia Tornado ADV (20 units), Panavia Tornado IDS (80 units) Eurofighter Typhoon (35 units)

              Ground Forces: Main Tanks - M1A2 (about 300 f.), M60A3 (approximately 500 units), AMX-30 (200 units) .... there are others.
              BMP M2A2 Bradley (400 units), BMP AMX-10 (approximately 500 units), also available LAV-90 и LAV-25.
              Of the ACS, the most common among the Saudis М109А2 155mm in the amount of 120 units.
              (I'm not talking about air defense, the Navy, etc., all take a long time to list)

              In addition, in S.A. There are Strategic Missile Forces that have liquid ballistic missiles DF-3 (a Chinese missile with a range of 2500 km.) with a conventional high-explosive warhead. About 110 missiles and 10 launchers. S.A. is considering the acquisition of advanced Chinese ballistic missiles DF-21 soon.

              PS

              В итоге - гипотетический, война против Саудовской Аравии в Сирии, для России была бы не легкой задачей. Так как, отсутствует необходимое количество военных баз в данном регионе, для получения превосходства. Если бы война началась сейчас – мы бы в ней увязли, хотя не исключено, что и выиграли, но с потерями.

              Again, I’m talking hypothetical, since to predict the outcome of such a war, where a bunch of variables gives a large number of different combinations of situations, it’s a thankless task. But for the good, Russia needs to have several military bases for various purposes in the Middle East. The situation requires it to protect national interests.
              1. kenig1 30 October 2015 17: 10 New
                • 39
                • 0
                +39
                The power of the SA we are observing in Yemen. With such success, one can start betting when Riyadh falls.
                1. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 21: 08 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Today, the SA announced the imminent end of the company in Yemen. So, purely for information. Although I personally support the Hussites, of course.
              2. Misha Honest 30 October 2015 17: 12 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                _Vladislav_

                Talk about nothing. (I'm glad that you calculated the combat power of the Saudis, and now please calculate the combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.) Even if you just count only the forces of our base in Latakia ...
                1. atalef 30 October 2015 17: 16 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  _Vladislav_

                  Talk about nothing. (I'm glad that you calculated the combat power of the Saudis, and now please calculate the combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.) Even if you just count only the forces of our base in Latakia ...

                  да причем тут боевая мощь Ирана + России , как ьуд тоне понятно , что за Саудов есть достаточно кому подписаться.
                  So, calm down - no one will start the 3rd World War from behind Syria.
                  The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin and what is the position of Russia?
                  1. sa-ag 30 October 2015 17: 24 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: atalef
                    Why did these negotiations begin and what is the position of Russia?

                    An interesting question, since negotiations begin, then there is the subject of the contract, who will get what and under what conditions
                    1. pilot bin-bom 30 October 2015 20: 29 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      So Assad has already expressed himself specifically on this - Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.
                      К примеру после иракских войн семьи Бушей в заливе нефтяные конктракты получили американские компании, ну а Россия простила Ираку долг (по посьбе из Вашингтона).
                      And the price of oil, the control of the oil market - this is directly the way of life of the Saudis.
                      1. atalef 30 October 2015 20: 44 New
                        • -1
                        • 0
                        -1
                        Quote: Pilot Bin Bom
                        Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.

                        In Syria, oil reserves are minuscule
                        А выход доп. объёмов ( в разработку которых надо ещё так не хило вложиться ) только понизит цену
                      2. neri73-r 31 October 2015 15: 46 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: atalef
                        Quote: Pilot Bin Bom
                        Russia helps to win the war - receives oil contracts.

                        In Syria, oil reserves are minuscule
                        А выход доп. объёмов ( в разработку которых надо ещё так не хило вложиться ) только понизит цену



                        The main thing is that your friends (Qatar and other democratic monarchies) do not have access to the coast, and we have enough oil and gas !!! We block delivery routes and our product will be bought! This reason is already enough! hi
                2. _Vladislav_ 30 October 2015 17: 36 New
                  • 10
                  • 0
                  +10
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  Even if you just count only the strength of our base in Latakia ...

                  12 Su-24M front-line bombers and Su-25SM attack aircraft, 6 Su-34 bombers, 4 Su-30SM fighters, as well as Mi-24 attack helicopters and Mi-17 multi-purpose helicopters
                  In Latakia, the base of the airborne forces is relatively small, it should be said that the need to expand the number of aircraft is also announced in our Ministry of Defense.

                  К тому же не корректно сравнивать эффективность ведения авиаударов по террористам (не имеющих соответствующих ПВО) и вероятный вооруженный конфликт с СА. Так как у саудитов есть ПВО средней руки:
                  SAM MIM-104 PAC-2 "Patriot", 21 batteries.

                  The possibilities of an air group in Latakia for a war with the regular army of the SA are small (and this is mildly said). More military bases are needed, moreover, for various purposes - for these purposes.
                  Farther…..

                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  combat power of the armed forces of Iran + Russia.

                  I still prefer to compare specifically the Russian Federation and the SA. By the fact that if it comes to, as you say, Iran + Russia, then it is appropriate to say that CA + USA. P.E. it is not correct. We compare specific potentials, and possible mutual damage.

                  PS
                  Do not get me wrong, I am not at all against the success of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the Syrian company, and indeed the military successes of the Russian Federation in the future (I'm even FOR). But, it’s kind of like a Military Review, and I’m somewhat annoyed that a comparison of the potentials of the countries and possible mutual damage did not find understanding here.
                  1. kotvov 30 October 2015 18: 08 New
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    +6
                    that a comparison of the potentials of countries and possible mutual damage, here is not understood. ,,
                    do you think the site can’t use the search engine? all these flying tanks on paper, how many of them travel, fly, what kind of combat readiness? and how they can fight in Yemen can be seen. so you don’t even need to compare the SA and Russia.
                  2. Bekas1967 30 October 2015 18: 23 New
                    • 14
                    • 0
                    +14
                    I’ll tell you one thing for sure: all of their air defense will “go blind” and not a single airplane will rise, it will simply not have time .. That’s if tomorrow is war. Objectively. And with the destroyed oil infrastructure this country will turn into a desert in a year or two. All these sheikhs will be dumped in Great Britain will be ruled from there. A good bridgehead prepared.
                  3. ferdiperdozzz 31 October 2015 09: 35 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    I gave you a plus here and there. For analysis (any) is more interesting than reading here “we’re all rags,” for the sake of gaining advantages. Gives a "censor" at times, unfortunately.
                  4. BARKHAN 31 October 2015 22: 55 New
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    +4
                    And, what, someone generally thinks (in the event of a conflict with the SA ... and, purely hypothetically, of course) that it will be necessary to land assault forces and overcome air defense request Вполне хватит и крылатых ракет с тактическим ЯЗ.Способы доставки придумают в Генштабе.Хватит уже этих любезностей с водителями верблюдов.Нам их земля ни к чему,значит и высаживаться нефиг.Вполне достаточно пересадить их обратно на верблюдов.Долгов у них к нам накопилось достаточно за русскую кровь.
                    Насчёт того ,что много ,кто за них впишется...ну-ну...будут сидеть тихо и молить Алаха ,чтоб ветер не подул в их сторону...Давайте ка вспомним ,много ли вписались за Мишико и Пороха...Ну ,а визги..не впервой.Санкции?Вот и спасибо на добром слове.
                3. EGOrkka 30 October 2015 17: 38 New
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  +6
                  atalef
                  The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin


                  Sdrast ... here it is just understandable .... because Russia fit in! wink
                4. Manage 31 October 2015 00: 17 New
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  +5
                  Why so many words? Just look into these scared eyes in the photo.
                5. fif21 31 October 2015 07: 42 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: atalef
                  The question is completely different, namely, why did these negotiations begin
                  Это не переговоры! Переговоры -это стороны конфликта и посредники о чем то договариваются. Тут обыкновенный заговор, или совещание (если угодно) по уничтожению Сирии , явная попытка вмешательства в дела суверенного государства, этакий клуб "друзей" Сирии. А позиция России известна. Россия оказывает помощь Сирии в отражении внешней и внутренней агрессии.
              3. aksakal 30 October 2015 18: 38 New
                • 14
                • 0
                +14
                Quote: Misha Honest
                Even if you just count only the strength of our base in Latakia ..
                - воевать Россия с Саудовской Аравией не будет - но, если все-таки дойдет до дела, то тогда... А как может дойти до дела? Вот так: ну сколько же можно делать вид, что международный терроризм в лице всяких ИГИЛ и Нуср - сам по себе, а Саудовская Аравия - сама по себе? Все уже отлично знают, что вся эта шушера - тупо иностранный экспедиционный легион саудов. Вон как с хуситами пошли осложнения - в момент 500 игиловцев из Сирии перекинули... И те покрно погрузились в самолеты и отправились воевать на другой фронт. На повстанцев против сирийского режима вообще не похоже, а здорово смахивает на наемную армию! Не очень понимаю большую политику - я вижу руку, что пытается ударить меня, бью по ней, при этом улыбаюсь хозяину этой руки и раскланиваюсь с ним. Хозяин руки тоже делает вид, что рука, пытающаяся ударить меня - не его и тоже вежливо улыбается мне laughing laughing That's really nonsense !!! So, if it comes to the point - it is easier to make secret deliveries to the Hussites - and the Saudis will lose their morale, and their desire to make themselves the “king of the region” will decrease.
            2. anfil 30 October 2015 17: 35 New
              • 12
              • 0
              +12
              If we consider the air force of this country, then we can say that this is a wide range of aircraft. This is the order of 100 squadrons represented by such machines as: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units),

              They listed all the equipment, but not a word about manpower! I watched the news here ...
              "According to intelligence, on October 26, 4 aircraft arrived from Turkey at the airport in Aden, Yemen. Two of them belong to Turkish airlines, one to Qatari and another to UAE airlines. More than 500 Islamic State terrorist organizations were on board the aircraft, their exported from Syria, saving from Russian air strikes, "said Ali Maykhub, spokesman for the Syrian Armed Forces.

              According to the Syrian general, the terrorists were taken out of the airport in three groups - one to Saudi Arabia and two to Yemen. Militants, according to Damascus, should join the so-called Saudi coalition. She suffered heavy losses in recent battles against the Yemeni rebels, who overthrew the country's president at the beginning of the year.


              So, the Syrian Armed Forces have been fighting for three years, and even with the help of the Russian air forces and went on the offensive, and these only got into Yemen and reinforcement is already required from ISIS.

              It’s not the technology that fights, but the people who control this technology.
            3. EGOrkka 30 October 2015 17: 36 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              _Vladislav
              hypothetical, the war against Saudi Arabia in Syria, for Russia would not be an easy task



              .....а кто с саудами воевать то собрался?....русские месяц в Сирии.....и все постепенно встает ...с головы...на ноги!...а может кто то и собрался....да передумал.....временно???!!! hi
            4. 2s1122 30 October 2015 17: 41 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              The Saudis buy this technique first. The second is attacks on oil wells and industrial centers, if any, so far. Then you need to act like the Americans to disable logistics. That's somehow.
            5. Ramzaj99 30 October 2015 17: 53 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia.

              To buy a bunch, even the latest technology on the planet, this is not enough. We need specialists to manage this, and not “parquet” warriors, but real professionals. In Saudi Arabia, they certainly are, but their number is scanty.
              1. I am Russian 30 October 2015 18: 42 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                To buy a bunch, even the latest technology on the planet, this is not enough. We need specialists to manage this, and not “parquet” warriors, but real professionals. In Saudi Arabia, they certainly are, but their number is scanty.


                Good day!
                There are mercenaries. There are a lot of them. Here in dill, for money from all over the world came together. And the Poles pilots, and snipers Poles, ameriko.sy, Lithuanians, etc. The main thing is dollars.
                1. Ramzaj99 30 October 2015 19: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: I-Russian
                  The main thing is dollars.

                  And they helped a lot in Dill (mercenaries) ??))
                  Dollars are good when you can spend them.
                  And with a real batch, not against the Papuans, but against real strength, where your chances of survival are equal to the statistical error, 90% of all mercenaries will either scatter or switch to the other side.
                  1. I am Russian 30 October 2015 19: 14 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: Ramzaj99
                    Quote: I-Russian
                    The main thing is dollars.

                    And they helped a lot in Dill ??))
                    Dollars are good when you can spend them.
                    And with a real batch, not against the Papuans, but against real strength, where your chances of survival are equal to the statistical error, 90% of all mercenaries will either scatter or switch to the other side.


                    I don't know in dill. In New Russia, many troubles have been done. Something not one has crossed. request
                    1. Ramzaj99 30 October 2015 22: 52 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: I-Russian
                      Something not one crossed

                      Nobody took it seriously for them ...)))))
                      And let's not compare, the war within the state and the war between states ....
                2. The comment was deleted.
            6. The comment was deleted.
            7. lopvlad 30 October 2015 18: 26 New
              • 10
              • 0
              +10
              The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.

              so wide that they can intercept a couple of dozen cruise missiles with nuclear warheads? or does someone naively think that Russia, in case of a threat to itself, will strike a symmetrical answer (if they have a knife in their hands, then we will only act with a knife)?

              And stop trying to scare us.
              We all saw perfectly how the Americans went about their job in Afghanistan. Someone will try to object "so the USSR did not achieve victory in Afghanistan."
              Тогда за спинами мождахедов воевавших с СССР стояли США а когда сами США пришли в Афганистан то за спинами тех с кем они воевали не стояли ни Россия ни СССР.
              And still they managed it.
              1. _Vladislav_ 30 October 2015 19: 15 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Firstly, I have never tried and do not try to prove that the armed forces of the SA are stronger than the RF Armed Forces. The Russian army is the second strongest in the world. And yes, Russia has so many nuclear weapons that the whole world can be smashed. But.....
                Quote: lopvlad
                so wide that they can intercept a couple of dozen cruise missiles with nuclear warheads? or someone naively thinks what if Russia threatens itself with a symmetrical response (if they have a knife in their hands, then we will only act with a knife)?


                I am sure that in Georgia 08.08.08. several of our Tu-22 aircraft and four Su-25 units were shot down. Reason: The enemy has the so-called air defense middle hand Buk-M1.
                I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                It is also reliably known that S.A. medium air defense available.
                It is reliably known that nuclear weapons are used in cases specified in the constitution of the Russian Federation. If we are talking about a threat to the territorial integrity of the country.
                Or someone naively believes that Russia is ready to become a nuclear aggressor in recent history due to a couple of crashed aircraft.

                I just urge you not to breed bravado, such as YES WE YES ENOUGH TO USE THE SCARK! I just - suggest thinking. Is it possible that the air defense, or the Saudi air force (in case of confrontation) could create a threat to our airborne forces.
                And here I would be very interested to know the opinion of a person who has knowledge in this area. I heard that there are such people on this site.
                1. lopvlad 30 October 2015 21: 21 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  I am sure that in Georgia 08.08.08


                  then our army was in such a state as the Ukrainian in 2014 (well, except for the Strategic Missile Forces). We were then in frank .....
                  This was the rubicon after which it was decided to create the RT channel and begin the rearmament of the army.
                  Moreover, a real large-scale rearmament of the army began only in 2013.

                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  I just urge you not to breed bravado


                  no one breeds bravado but simply speaks of real fighting efficiency instead of "See how much Saudi Arabia has"

                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  Or someone naively believes that Russia is ready to become a nuclear aggressor in recent history due to a couple of crashed aircraft.


                  I suppose. But those who thought that Russia would not answer because of the pair of killed peacekeepers in 2008 were severely broken off.
                  And remember that an attack on the armed forces of Russia is automatically an attack on Russia. Even the Americans understand this and therefore have a dialogue with the Russian military as they understand that due to a couple of fallen aircraft in the sky of Syria, the third world war can begin.
                2. Garris199 31 October 2015 03: 16 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                  Do not fly, fly with a conventional warhead. And they will fly where necessary.
                  1. ferdiperdozzz 31 October 2015 10: 10 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Garris199
                    Quote: _Vladislav_
                    I’m also sure that cruise missiles with nuclear warheads haven’t gone anywhere because of this.

                    Do not fly, fly with a conventional warhead. And they will fly where necessary.

                    Exactly, there (like in Qatar) a couple of oil / gas loading terminals can be set on fire for example (this does not require special warheads) - everyone will already have fun. And for this, IMHO enough "caliber" with 450kg of TNT. Well, or a few.
                    No one doubts that they fly as they should.
                    The question is - do we need it?
            8. bubla5 30 October 2015 19: 14 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Arab troops, they can only speak at the parade, they snickered there, if you throw something small to the Yemenis, the situation will change dramatically
            9. Esso 30 October 2015 19: 42 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              Quote: Misha Honest
              One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"

              Army of saudi arabia – это не Катар, ее возможности значительно шире. Если рассмотреть ВВС этой страны, то можно сказать что это широкий спектр летательных аппаратов. Это порядка 100 эскадрилий представленный такими машинами как: F-15 (various modifications about 200 units), Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighter(30 units) Panavia Tornado ADV (20 units), Panavia Tornado IDS (80 units) Eurofighter Typhoon (35 units)

              Ground Forces: Main Tanks - M1A2 (about 300 f.), M60A3 (approximately 500 units), AMX-30 (200 units) .... there are others.
              BMP M2A2 Bradley (400 units), BMP AMX-10 (approximately 500 units), also available LAV-90 и LAV-25.
              Of the ACS, the most common among the Saudis М109А2 155mm in the amount of 120 units.
              (I'm not talking about air defense, the Navy, etc., all take a long time to list)

              In addition, in S.A. There are Strategic Missile Forces that have liquid ballistic missiles DF-3 (a Chinese missile with a range of 2500 km.) with a conventional high-explosive warhead. About 110 missiles and 10 launchers. S.A. is considering the acquisition of advanced Chinese ballistic missiles DF-21 soon.

              PS

              В итоге - гипотетический, война против Саудовской Аравии в Сирии, для России была бы не легкой задачей. Так как, отсутствует необходимое количество военных баз в данном регионе, для получения превосходства. Если бы война началась сейчас – мы бы в ней увязли, хотя не исключено, что и выиграли, но с потерями.

              Again, I’m talking hypothetical, since to predict the outcome of such a war, where a bunch of variables gives a large number of different combinations of situations, it’s a thankless task. But for the good, Russia needs to have several military bases for various purposes in the Middle East. The situation requires it to protect national interests.

              Dear in the USSR, a plan was also developed for bombing the military and economic targets of the SA. Their army is fleeing before a serious and not serious adversary. (In Yemen, for example) The reason is the rich people who want to die. Let these desert camels know their place, otherwise we will drive them into the Stone Age instantly and they will have democracy!
            10. dr.star75 30 October 2015 20: 50 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              Russian nuclear warheads of 1500 pieces. The radius of the lesion is the solar system.
            11. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 21: 03 New
              • -1
              • 0
              -1
              I didn’t understand, but why did Vladislav’s comrades go awry? The whole person explained well, honestly, in detail and with the necessary patriotic bias. And what do you want, comrades, a post about us throwing Saudites with caps and buried in the sand?
              1. Morrrow 31 October 2015 01: 29 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Saudi Arabia win men in training. What are you talking about?
            12. PSih2097 30 October 2015 21: 16 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.

              if you strike airstrike on the oil fields of CA and Qatar, what will they have left there? and what will be the price of oil?
            13. smart Fox 30 October 2015 21: 22 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              They really have a lot of toys. It’s their tradition to buy a lot and all at once. But do they know how to play them?
              1. Ladoga 31 October 2015 03: 39 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                but can they play them?

                They know how to play, but only in words.
            14. Karayakupovo 30 October 2015 22: 09 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              About the SA SA can already definitely be said, it's like guarding the Vatican with Swiss arrows. There is a lot of pomposity, but zero sense. How many successful operations did the Saudi secret services carry out? You can even recall the murder during the liberation and hostages. They fight for money, and the Syrians for the country. It seems like this.
            15. The comment was deleted.
            16. dmitrich 31 October 2015 04: 09 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              The army of Saudi Arabia is not Qatar, its capabilities are much wider.
              it can be seen how they defeated in Yemen!
            17. user 31 October 2015 20: 06 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              As a result, a hypothetical war against Saudi Arabia in Syria would not be an easy task for Russia.


              People are fighting, and Saudi Arabia has problems with this. A high standard of living does not strongly call for the self-sacrifice of citizens of the country, unlike the Syrians who will go to the end (they simply have no choice left), and without this they won’t be able to win the war.
          2. voronbel53 30 October 2015 19: 02 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Если сауды не поняли, что Россия не для того ввязалась в этот гадюшник, в этот клубок взаимоотношений, то пусть поймут, что их мнением Россия , мягко говоря, зад.ницу подотрёт и будет действовать, как считает нужным. И с этим им придётся считаться, как бы они не решили,а мы решения свои не меняем- это не обсуждается, будем считать аксиомой...
            1. atalef 30 October 2015 21: 06 New
              • -3
              • 0
              -3
              Quote: voronbel53
              If the Saudis didn’t understand that Russia wasn’t getting involved in this viper,

              It’s a pity that they didn’t hear Lavrov’s speech now.
              Independent elections with the participation of all Syrian citizens, regardless of their residence (words of Lavrov) - forget about Assad.
          3. Drёma 31 October 2015 04: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Only he screams, rather, not "about", but "on a" golden toilet.
            And the toilet - as usual - in the toilet ...
            In short, it's time to drench.
        2. pvv113 30 October 2015 17: 38 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Так ему текст для выступления и накатали в Госдепе
        3. smart Fox 30 October 2015 21: 19 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          And this is true, it means that the American ophthalmologist Assad was unable to bend under themselves, and the proud Arab sheikhs, the proud lords of deserts and oil, long ago bent over and took a comfortable pose.
          И они ещё смеют что-то speak? Да кто ни такие?
    2. Major Yurik 30 October 2015 16: 21 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      This group of gruffles in camouflage robes, instead of clothes, will exclusively look on the path leading to the mother’s mother! am
    3. self-propelled 30 October 2015 16: 29 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Misha Honest
      One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"

      Quote: Sveles
      Chezh did not remove it before?

      enough health to remove Assad ?!
      this is not your story with Muammar Gaddafi (unfortunately, at that time he didn’t have a “strong shoulder” in Russia).
      otherwise, "from heart failure" may die some emirs and others like them ...
    4. Sid.74 30 October 2015 16: 41 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Saudi Foreign Minister said that Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"

      Seen newspapers do not read the disease! smile

      WSJ: "The Obama administration is ready to support the transitional period led by Assad for several months or longer."

      Or longer! bully
    5. kodxnumx 30 October 2015 17: 06 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      They are vomiting before, one salvo at their oil refining and also oil fields and all again will be herds of camels, imagined themselves not to understand who the Shepherds were.
      1. Vadim237 30 October 2015 17: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Their economy is not only oil production, but also the world's largest financial center, and by blows to oil fields we will only raise the price per barrel.
        1. Morrrow 31 October 2015 01: 31 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          They have no economy. 90% is oil.
    6. northern 30 October 2015 17: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Sveles
      Chezh did not remove it before?

      And for such rhetoric, the Saudis did not previously have sanction from the black ruler.
      The State Department, in connection with the obvious successes of the Russian Aerospace Forces, is no longer able to say such a thing, but completely along with the allies.
      Not at all surprised, considering who are the main sponsors of world terrorism (states and saudas). If only the shameful Saudi printers with tones of meta in luggage would not have fired yet. so would pass for respected people.
    7. meriem1 30 October 2015 18: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Sveles
      Chezh did not remove it before?


      Он сам не боится в золотом унитазе утонуть ненароком??? А потом про демократию там нужно срочно поговорить. Доказать, что её там нет... как два пальца... Может своими крылатыми ракетами нужно поможочь угнетённому народу??? Или "свободный мир" опять не оценит?
    8. dmitrich 31 October 2015 04: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      what a brave man!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Vend 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    Quote: Misha Honest
    al jubeyr

    Why be surprised. He has a classical education. He studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982, he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984, he received a master's degree in international relations from Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So the mattresses brought him up in his own image and likeness
    1. Gxash 30 October 2015 15: 55 New
      • 28
      • 0
      +28
      But it’s not easier to tell us the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is a country that does not take human rights into account, applying medieval punishments such as “stoning,” “cutting off hands,” etc.
      There have never been any elections there, and in general they behave far NOT democratically ...

      В сравнении с ними многоуважаемый мной Башар Асад - ангел во плоти и главный демократ, прости Господи, Ближнего Востока!
      1. Zoldat_A 30 October 2015 16: 41 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Gxash
        But it’s not easier to tell us the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is a country, disregarding human rights, applying medieval punishments in the form of "stoning", "chopping off hands", etc.
        There have never been any elections there, and in general they behave far NOT democratically ...

        And it’s not easier to tell us to the whole world at the UN that the Saudi monarchy is NOT a country at all, but a bunch of oil-fed Bedouins, who understood everything about yachts and golden toilet bowls, and stayed to twist their camels with their heads.
    2. Andrea 30 October 2015 16: 16 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Wend

      Why be surprised. He has a classical education. He studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982, he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984, he received a master's degree in international relations from Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So the mattresses brought him up in his own image and likeness
      Where the venerable information.
      By the number of completed institutions and titles in front of us is a luminosum overgrown with moss, a storehouse of wisdom, so to speak. laughing
      But Lavrov proved the opposite in two words.
      Maybe the petrodollars studied for it, as is customary there, more pathos and peacock feathers, maybe it’s a ride, but for some reason it never rolls. what
      1. Vend 30 October 2015 16: 26 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Andrea
        Quote: Wend

        Why be surprised. He has a classical education. He studied in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Germany and the USA. In 1982, he received a bachelor's degree in political science and economics from the University of North Texas. In 1984, he received a master's degree in international relations from Georgetown University [2]. 2006 received an honorary degree from the University of North Texas. " So the mattresses brought him up in his own image and likeness
        Where the venerable information.

        Yes, on the Internet I looked at information about this minister.
        1. Andrea 30 October 2015 16: 47 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Vend
          The question was rhetorical, of course, I myself watched there
      2. Major Yurik 30 October 2015 16: 37 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Yeah, the sheikh is the correspondence! wassat
    3. avg
      avg 30 October 2015 16: 38 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Wend
      He has a classical education

      We know, we know how such kids learn ... And it is from such "education" that they have a "peacock ambition" laughing
    4. Kent0001 30 October 2015 16: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Something he reminded me of Comrade Saakashvili.
  4. Lord of the Sith 30 October 2015 15: 47 New
    • 27
    • 0
    +27
    Either the head of the Saudi Arabian Foreign Ministry will shut up, or they will have to help the Hussites.
  5. Andrea 30 October 2015 15: 48 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10

    The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated approximately like this: and who, in fact, is this al-Jubeyr
    Damn damn it.
    You look at the face and for sure.
    And yet ... the executioner in Arabia cries for him there, I heard fagots are executed. am
    1. SRC P-15 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Either he (Bashar al-Assad - approx. “VO”) will leave as part of the political process, or he will have to be removed by force.

      Itself sits in a shroud, and all there too - to threaten!
  6. Denis DV 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Wildly sorry, but the arabchik looks like Yarmolnik)))
    1. MIKHAN 30 October 2015 15: 58 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Assad will not leave ... Until order is restored! And the point ...
      1. Prapor-527 30 October 2015 17: 45 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Assad will not leave ... Until order is restored! And the point ... Assad, I think will go away... Russia is important not Assad, but Syria. There is a necessary leader ... PC Personal opinion ...
  7. Prapor-527 30 October 2015 15: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    They are there choimmortal?
    1. avt
      avt 30 October 2015 16: 20 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Prapor-527
      They are there, immortal?

      Не-е-е. Лавров уже им прям на встрече с ними под видеокамеры пишущие характеристику дал - ,,Дебилы блд!" laughingThis is to say the least, if they got a real diplomat accustomed to everything. laughing
      1. SteelRatTV 30 October 2015 16: 27 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        "... he said everything!" am There is nothing to add to Lavrov’s energetic statement. hi
      2. Prapor-527 30 October 2015 17: 23 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: avt
        ,, morons bld! "

        Immortal "morons bld"? wassat
        1. avt
          avt 31 October 2015 10: 45 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Prapor-527
          Immortal "morons bld"?

          More likely hereditary.
  8. APASUS 30 October 2015 16: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Misha Honest
    One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"

    Well, what are you?
    He expressed the idea that the Americans cannot openly voice, that's all. Now it will be even more interesting, because it is through the SA that the Americans send anti-tank systems to moderate thugs ...........
    1. Vita vko 30 October 2015 16: 31 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It seems that the foreign ministers of some countries gathered for a thieves ’meeting and are judged by concepts. It is time for the Saudis to democratize themselves, not only have snickered, they are also organizing genocide, they are financing terrorists and supporting the drug business. It’s time for the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation to raise the issue of regimes and states supporting and financing fascists, terrorists and other criminal organizations. It is impossible to maintain relations with such countries, isolation is at least.
  9. Mareman Vasilich 30 October 2015 16: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    He was given the command “Fas!”, So he barks.
  10. Alekseir162 30 October 2015 16: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Will you risk your health?"

    Yes, of course not, the point is not iron. It’s just that these guys from petrodollars "the roof has completely moved down." what
  11. Berg berg 30 October 2015 16: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    interesting, but he himself is not afraid that the next revolution of dates will be in Saudi Arabia!?
  12. Mayer1980 30 October 2015 17: 00 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    we’ll also come to the Saudis if they continue to spread this infection
  13. Finntroll 30 October 2015 20: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Better wish him good luck! and also give the flag in your hands, stick the propeller in the ass and let KAMAZ meet. something like this
  14. Abakan 30 October 2015 20: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    he or she or it))) will not risk !!!
  15. jovanni 30 October 2015 20: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Misha Honest
    One would like to ask Comrade Jubeyr: "Do you risk your health?"



    Не брат, не товарищ он нам...
    1. amirbek 31 October 2015 06: 37 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      something this joe beir doesn’t look like a saudita ... especially when worried lol
  16. Skif83 31 October 2015 09: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Saudis are also Semites. Therefore, one can expect anything from them, just for embrasure, they themselves are somehow not really ... They’ll beat others up for a “good” cause, always with their pleasure.
  • prabiz 30 October 2015 15: 40 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    По набрались у америкосовов -stupid people! fool
  • svp67 30 October 2015 15: 41 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Either he (Bashar al-Assad - approx. “VO”) will leave as part of the political process, or he will have to be removed by force.
    Well then, you have two prospects, either you can succeed or not ... But it just seems to me that it will be FRAWN.
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 30 October 2015 17: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I believe that the applicant himself did not understand what he said. He simply yelled, thinking that he was falling into the stream ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • horoh 30 October 2015 15: 42 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Well, let them try, bedding mattress. And they didn’t think about the consequences, the heroes are bad ...
    1. Proxima 30 October 2015 15: 53 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      His words are just the squeal of a jackal. History has shown that S. Arabia is militarily complete zero.
  • sever.56 30 October 2015 15: 42 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Did Coke sniff something? First, let their heads stop chopping and stoning, and then only talk about what kind of "bloody" regime Assad established in Syria. Only the Syrians can decide what power they will have and who will be in charge of the state!
    1. Air Force captain 30 October 2015 16: 17 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It’s necessary to send him to the drug test ... and the results of the Sharia’s trial to the SA ... then we'll see how he sings
  • Vladimyrych 30 October 2015 15: 43 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    The navel will unleash the son of a camel.
  • dsi
    dsi 30 October 2015 15: 43 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    that “Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States

    The primary concern for the United States is the disappearance of Russia from the world map forever.
    1. dmi.pris 30 October 2015 15: 57 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The primary task of all mankind is the disappearance of mattress from planet Earth .. and no closer than Alpha Centauri ..... Unhappy humanoids ...
      Quote: dsi
      that “Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States

      The primary concern for the United States is the disappearance of Russia from the world map forever.
  • ser-pov 30 October 2015 15: 44 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Heck! I realized exclusivity is contagious .... wassat
  • the most important 30 October 2015 15: 44 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    It can be seen that the Saudis, as well as their beloved camels, the situation in the outside world only reaches the seventh day, and even then with distortions ... Shoigu, still the best diplomat for the Middle East!
  • Rokossovsky 30 October 2015 15: 45 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    It is clear that while Syria and Assad are under our care, no one will even rock the boat! All talk is another bluff!
    1. EGOrkka 30 October 2015 18: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Rokossovsky
      it’s obvious that while Syria and Assad are under our care, no one will even rock the boat



      ..... that's just the time .... to talk! hi
  • AlexSam 30 October 2015 15: 45 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    But what does Comrade Lavrov think about this? - asked Joseph Vissarionovich, puffing his pipe ...
  • jaguarstas 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    And if you push the IS from Syria to the Saudis? Do not completely remove, but simply transfer ...
  • Das Boot 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Dude with his eyes down with his threat a little late, I think. At least, about the "power" is clearly not to tell him.
    1. Hello 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote: Das Boot
      Dude with his eyes down with his threat a little late, I think. At least, about the "power" is clearly not to tell him.

      So here it is, over shouting loudly and beating yourself in the chest with your fist otherwise they will think that you are weak wink
      1. DenZ 30 October 2015 15: 57 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        So here it is, over shouting loudly and beating yourself in the chest with your fist otherwise they will think that you are weak

        Yes, even shouting loudly, even babbling in a whisper, things do not change. It’s not for them to talk about the strength of our VKS in Syria. And I think they will not leave there until everything, including the political process, is over and leaves the rear to the Saudis.
        1. Das Boot 30 October 2015 16: 02 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: DenZ
          Yes, even shouting loudly, even babbling in a whisper, things do not change. It’s not for them to talk about strength while our VKS in Syria

          Yes, that's not the point. The Saudis have fun military construction. Epic lottery, kickbacks and cuts. With their military budget comparable to ours - in theory there should be a better army in the region. But in reality - somewhat, to put it mildly, not so.
          1. DenZ 30 October 2015 16: 10 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Yes, that's not the point. The Saudis have fun military construction. Epic lottery, kickbacks and cuts. With their military budget comparable to ours - in theory there should be a better army in the region. But in reality - somewhat, to put it mildly, not so.

            About the state of the Saudi army, everything is clear here, But even with this state, they are a serious opponent to Syria, assuming that the Russian Air Force is not in Syria. But they are there, for now, I do not think that the Saudis will get in there (although, perhaps, they can climb in order to fuel the situation almost before the start of World War 3 with the filing of friends from behind a puddle).
  • Santa bear 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Это про него Лавров сказал "stupid people..бл#дь"?
  • DenZ 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    and who, in fact, is this al-Jubeir, who decided that he has some right to speak out about the forceful deposition of the leader of a foreign state?

    Интересно, если бы Лавров этому Джубейру задал вопрос именно в такой формулировке какой был бы ответ?
  • asadov 30 October 2015 15: 47 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    as they say, a flag in your hands and a drum in your teeth. Pi ...... don’t roll bags.
  • Proxima 30 October 2015 15: 47 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    But this Foreign Minister did not think when they would send the royal dynasty of the Saudis, these fundamental US zadolises, to resign ??!
  • Don
    Don 30 October 2015 15: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What about today's missile launches? Who knows what, enlighten!
  • Altona 30 October 2015 15: 48 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The prince of a deserted gas station made a statement that in the last century was tantamount to a declaration of war ...
  • Grigorievich 30 October 2015 15: 49 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    It would be better if they thought how to get out of Yemen, otherwise they will break all your teeth.
  • bronik 30 October 2015 15: 49 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    And this is not a prince caught with two tons of drugs?
    1. vovanpain 30 October 2015 15: 57 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      And Allah will take them apart, there are these pricks like frogs in a swamp, who got an oil rig and a prince put a sheet on his head.
  • Belarus 30 October 2015 15: 53 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Standard situation: America and the Saudis play the game good and bad.Nothing new as they say, the Saudis portray themselves as such independent and kind of evil, and at the same time they want to ward off suspicion from the Americans in an unscrupulous game against Syria.
    Say that they will succeed - it’s a lie, but they can thoroughly pat their nerves. There is one question, as they say - whose eggs will be stronger both politically and militarily.
  • Aleksandr1959 30 October 2015 15: 55 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Assad’s departure will save not Syria, but Saudi Arabia. Yes, and Iran will add problems. So, let this comrade go to the forest .... and away. wassat
  • Zheka40 30 October 2015 15: 56 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Dumb Minister.
  • dchegrinec 30 October 2015 15: 57 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    No one will ask the Saudis, they would sit there and sniff better, the bumps on the level place of the Christmas tree ..
  • jetfors_84 30 October 2015 15: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Today they wrote what happened two weeks ago
  • 205577 30 October 2015 15: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Does the person with the eyes of the addict have something to say to us?
    You, dear, it’s better not to get out from under your turban. Sit there in your cozy little world and think that you are the ruler of the world, and the World will somehow live without your thoughts.
    In general, everything according to the unforgettable Krylov is Ay, Moska, she is strong to know, barks at an elephant.
  • Mountain shooter 30 October 2015 15: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    People who are not familiar with the word “impossible” from infancy are dangerous to others. Stripes are also the same, they found each other. IMHO, when this Al-Jubeyr recalls how many favorite green papers were turned into smoke by the Russian air forces, and all because of this Assad, anger bubbles in his throat and overshadows the mind (if any).
  • VNP1958PVN 30 October 2015 16: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Saudi Foreign Minister said that Assad needs to leave, or "he will have to be removed by force"
    Come on, Europe has already had Hussein and Gaddafi. Almost sob!
  • cniza 30 October 2015 16: 03 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Whose cow would mumble ... the "clean" mouthpiece of the United States and in general it looks like a blue one. wassat
  • yan 2015
    yan 2015 30 October 2015 16: 04 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    в таком вопросе очень важно не ошибиться.Я бы посоветовал саудитам семь раз отмерить..и восемь и девять..ну что-бы не ошибиться.потому что мы мерить не будем.мы будем отмерять время этому королевству.
  • win
    win 30 October 2015 16: 05 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    and who, in fact, is this al-Jubair


    The question should be shirche - what kind of country Saudi Arabia?

    Here rabbits were brought to Australia, they got divorced ...

    And pigs were brought to New Zealand.

    An instructive historical experience.

    And if you bring to the Arabian Peninsula ...?
  • Eltempo23rus 30 October 2015 16: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    So I want to take and ... Caliber in places of oil production SA.
  • sinukvl 30 October 2015 16: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    But can he remove by force the King of Saudi Arabia Salman and the entire Al Saud dynasty?
  • nord62 30 October 2015 16: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So young, and as much mind as the senile McCain! laughing What is it they all have the same diagnosis - idiocy !? what
  • manguest 30 October 2015 16: 07 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The young man smoked a hookah and issued a thesis. The fact that he concurrently someone at KSA fundamentally does not change anything would be sorted out with Yemen first, maybe then he would have listened to the opinion. Only it is unlikely
  • trewis 30 October 2015 16: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Он может убрать только за Обамой,и то, если тот разрешит!
  • BLOND 30 October 2015 16: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "... since when has diplomacy in a number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, come to be considered its competence, have the citizens of Syria made the right or wrong choice? ...
    "Morons b..t!", Including the same Saudi Arabia!
  • Kelwin 30 October 2015 16: 12 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Hmm ... Comrade Minister, but what, "power" has grown?))
  • Tummyr 30 October 2015 16: 12 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Isn't he pi-rock by chance? what
  • Alexander 3 30 October 2015 16: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Having read all the comments addressed to him, this Saudi would probably have been cut off from anger that he said such nonsense. If he doesn’t worry, he is not very different from some talkers.
  • yuriy55 30 October 2015 16: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The first question that arises after such a statement can be formulated something like this: and who, in fact, is this al-Jubairwho decided that he has some right to speak out about the forceful removal of the leader of a foreign state?

    Some strange sentence-answers with phrases form in my head: “How long have you been, dear, wiped yourself with dungs ​​that you teach others”; "the hoop on the brain does not press much?"; "American litter" ...
    In a word, let the ears of this Saracen go by ... negative
  • kizhe 30 October 2015 16: 17 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The dog barks, the wind wears.
    1. sabakina 30 October 2015 18: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: kizhe
      The dog barks, the wind wears.

      And the Syrian caravan is coming ...
  • bronik 30 October 2015 16: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And he orally raped someone .. Now he opened his mouth for some reason.
  • Pacifist 30 October 2015 16: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Надо понимать причины такого резкого наезда. Они вбухали миллиарды в эту игиловскую шушеру, а теперь и деньги прос..ли, и весь этот человеческий мусор с оружием и обдолбанными мозгами попер обратно. И демпинг по нефти пошел прахом, сами чуть по ветру не пошли. Вот и бесятся....
  • ALEA IACTA EST 30 October 2015 16: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Does this freaked news not read? Doesn’t watch TV? Doesn’t look out the window?
    I have never met a man who so desperately wants to destroy his country ...
  • ivan bogomolov 30 October 2015 16: 25 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    They are brothers, here and there, one person, just some kind of movie. wassat
    1. Sibbars 30 October 2015 16: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: ivan bogomolov
      They are brothers, here and there, one person, just some kind of movie. wassat

      But really, as if one face, a different make-up, watch it for sure more.
      1. EGOrkka 30 October 2015 17: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Sibbars
        But really, as if one face


        ... so from a test tube .... they have one test tube for all the PSS .. laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • RUSIVAN 30 October 2015 16: 29 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    It seems to me alone or it really looks like .... this Al-Jubair, "vampire" of the east)))
    1. ivan bogomolov 30 October 2015 16: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Ah ,,, HA .... I’ll shave myself right now, well, just one face ....))))))))) laughing
  • demo 30 October 2015 16: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Meanwhile, the militant rhetoric of a Saudi official is not shared (or pretended not to be) in Washington. The day before, US officials said that "Assad’s resignation from the post of Syrian president is not a priority for the United States."

    It’s just that the guys from the Washington regional committee decided that they needed to correct their image in the eyes of the “world public”.
    And then their radicalism is beginning to be very embarrassing.
    Therefore, they gave the floor to a comrade from Riad.
  • vell.65 30 October 2015 16: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    How would the Saudis react if someone did not like the monarchy in their country. More reminiscent of the threat of declaring war on Syria.