KRET declares readiness to create systems that reduce the effectiveness of eurPRO to zero

General Designer of KRET Corporation (Radio Electronic Technologies Concern) Yuri Maevsky in an interview RIA News announced that KRET specialists are preparing the latest developments, which will reduce to zero the effectiveness of all attempts to create a US missile defense system in Europe. It is reported that the Russian response will be asymmetrical.


KRET declares readiness to create systems that reduce the effectiveness of eurPRO to zero


Yuri Maevsky:
KRET is ready to build and supply high-performance means and electronic warfare systems of various bases to neutralize missile defense elements in Europe.


KRET notes that today the Russian Federation is the world leader in the development and operation of EW systems. It must be emphasized that the same opinion is also held in Washington, where people are usually used to claiming their primacy in almost all military and civilian areas.

Recall that earlier the US authorities stated that the European missile defense system is not directed against the Russian Federation, and its creation is associated with "Iran's nuclear projects." But even now, when all uranium enrichment projects by Iranian specialists are being curtailed, efforts are continuing in Europe to create elements of the US missile defense, which could upset global parity.
Photos used:
http://kret.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez 30 October 2015 15: 12 New
    • 48
    • 0
    +48
    Kohl declares means to do. We don’t throw words into the wind, said - made. Man, however.
    1. Gxash 30 October 2015 15: 14 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Yes, immediately do missiles of all stripes with electronic warfare and do all business ...
      1. MIKHAN 30 October 2015 15: 24 New
        • 85
        • 0
        +85
        I'm not special, but I always sensed with genes ... That we can find a bolt with our thread on any nut ..! And the twist will be forever, gentlemen ... Do not anger us and everything will be fine! hi
        1. Genur 30 October 2015 16: 01 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          ... with SCREW ...
          1. nemo778 30 October 2015 22: 43 New
            • 22
            • 0
            +22
            Dear friends! Look! I think komenty, too much! pluses are not necessary! hi I'm too old on this site! love
            1. nemo778 30 October 2015 23: 06 New
              • 17
              • 0
              +17
              Very interesting! Take a look! soldier
              1. morozik 30 October 2015 23: 46 New
                • 20
                • 0
                +20
                The commander of the US Air Force in Europe, General Frank Gorenk, spoke out that the Russian electronic warfare systems nullify all the advantages of high-tech weapons that are armed with NATO. "They closed the gap. “Our advantage in the air is melting,” the general said. “But what’s most alarming is their new ability to implement a strategy to restrict access to certain territories (A2 / AD)." An explanation is needed. The term A2 / AD in NATO means countering the admission of foreign troops to their territory (anti-access or A2) while limiting their effective actions on the territory if they could break through (area-denial or AD). In the West, primarily in the USA, it was believed that only they possess the secret of the implementation of the A2 / AD concept and will never allow enemy troops, from their point of view, to invade their borders. They themselves have the right to declare any region of the globe a zone of their vital interests. And, of course, to conduct unpunished hostilities there. The territory of our country was no exception. And then it turned out that not every plane or rocket could simply fly over the border of Russia, not to mention the use of precision strikes. An almost insurmountable obstacle is the invisible wall of various electronic warfare systems, which, using a fashionable expression, “carry the brain” to the “smartest” weapons available in NATO arsenals. Here is what Nikolai Kolesov, General Director of Radioelectronic Technologies Concern, says on this subject: “Russia does not plug any gaps. We rather return to the once abandoned position. EW tools are one of the key elements of the A2 / AD concept in the event of a confrontation with an adversary who is used to acting on an advantage in the sky and relying on high-precision weapons, as well as comprehensive and "deep" intelligence. However, electronic warfare can knock out all these trump cards from the hands of the aggressor, creating literally unbearable conditions for the so-called "projection of force." You can recall what the Reb technology today. Russian Aerospace Forces receive planes and helicopters, which, having special equipment, are able not only to provide individual protection, but also to cover entire areas, disrupting enemy communications, making reconnaissance and the use of high-precision weapons difficult. Such means include, for example, the unique Lever-AV helicopter complex, capable of “blinding” enemy radars at a distance of several hundred kilometers. The think tank of ground-based high-tech defense is the Moscow-1 electronic intelligence and control complex. Its capabilities allow radio-technical reconnaissance of airspace at a range of up to 400 km. The reconnaissance of target parameters is conducted in a passive mode, which ensures high stealth operation. After the detection of air targets, their parameters are transferred to other systems of electronic warfare, air defense and aviation. On the management of "Moscow-1" at the same time can be more than 7 electronic warfare systems. Among the things that Moscow-1 manages are mobile electronic warfare systems of the Krasukha family. They are capable of detecting and effectively suppressing the airborne radar of enemy aircraft at ranges of up to 300 km, preventing the detection of targets in the protected area and the use of weapons on them. The comprehensive and competent use of these systems does not allow the enemy to quickly hit the objects of state and military command, information infrastructure, the most important economic objects and means of retaliation. So the Russian Armed Forces own A2 / AD technology.
              2. complete zero 1 November 2015 10: 27 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                everything is clear with a radio fuse, it’s not clear that there are other missiles, because not only are they pointing along the “beam” but there are OLS (thermal head) how can they be detected?
                1. dali 1 November 2015 14: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: full zero
                  everything is clear with a radio fuse, it’s not clear that there are other missiles, because not only are they pointing along the “beam” but there are OLS (thermal head) how can they be detected?
                  Look with 3m40s ... it turns out that the methods for guiding enemy missiles have nothing to do with it !!! Even if without guidance systems at all ...
        2. NEXUS 30 October 2015 17: 51 New
          • 19
          • 0
          +19
          Quote: MIKHAN
          I'm not special, but I always sensed with genes ... That we can find a bolt with our thread on any nut ..! And the twist will be forever, gentlemen ... Do not anger us and everything will be fine!

          Given their tolerance, a bolt with a left-handed thread is likely laughing
          The Kratovites are great. They work out their own piece of bread honestly. They don’t run around with the mock-ups at the exhibitions and don’t vote what they’ll ever do. They claim that they do without idle talk and fuss.
          1. arane 30 October 2015 22: 04 New
            • 13
            • 0
            +13
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: MIKHAN
            I'm not special, but I always sensed with genes ... That we can find a bolt with our thread on any nut ..! And the twist will be forever, gentlemen ... Do not anger us and everything will be fine!

            Given their tolerance, a bolt with a left-handed thread is likely laughing
            The Kratovites are great. They work out their own piece of bread honestly. They don’t run around with the mock-ups at the exhibitions and don’t vote what they’ll ever do. They claim that they do without idle talk and fuss.

            Who cares what thread? We won’t screw anyway, we’ll forget!
            1. kori 2 November 2015 11: 02 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Let's turn it back and hold it)
        3. Tatar 174 30 October 2015 18: 24 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          It will be possible to turn off the Ukrainians all if they begin to excite against us. wink
          1. Voha_krim 31 October 2015 06: 15 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: Tartar 174
            It will be possible to turn off the Ukrainians all if they begin to excite against us. wink

            Mikhail TIMOSHENKO has already fantasized on this topic in an article What would the conflict look like in the Donbass if the Armed Forces of Russia really participated in it

            http://www.kp.ru/daily/26353.4/3234610/

            laughing good
          2. KORSAR12 31 October 2015 09: 59 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            All is not necessary, leave VGTRK plizd ...
    2. Finches 30 October 2015 15: 20 New
      • 23
      • 0
      +23
      Good news!
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. vyinemeynen 30 October 2015 15: 31 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Here we go! Previously, they hid and did, and then they used and won!
      Now the information war prepare the latest developments and already announce their goals!
      Such statements look strange (either disa for their own, or infa for strangers).
      In general, it is recalled (there were such allegations) that there could have been no war (start) at 41 if the Germans knew about T34.
      I want to believe that know what and why declare!
      1. Rom14 30 October 2015 15: 51 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        It’s not just once that it’s been made and tested, it’s not just that the American sailors escaped from the ship, and enemy planes do not fly close to ours ... Medvedev also threatened - the answer would be adequate.
        1. Izotovp 30 October 2015 15: 53 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          And let’s rejoice that the answer is adequate ... for now ... wassat
      2. Genur 30 October 2015 16: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I’m afraid that “good” has arrived here too. from there.
      3. aleks 62 next 30 October 2015 16: 23 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        ..... that there could be no war (start) in 41 if the Germans knew about T34 .....

        .... Hardly ..... The Germans knew about the T-34 ..... And the T-34 at the beginning of the war was several hundred pieces .... Mostly there were light tanks and not a very large number of KV .. ... hi
        1. Amurets 30 October 2015 17: 13 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: aleks 62 next
          Hardly ..... Germans knew about the T-34 ..... And the T-34 at the beginning of the war was several hundred pieces .... Mostly there were light tanks and not a very large number of KV ..... hi

          At the beginning of the war, there were 1960 T-34 tanks and 646 KV-1 and KV-2 tanks. The Kirov plant was not adapted for mass production of equipment, and in Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk the capacities for in-line production of tanks were not ready. UVZ was to manufacture hulls and towers Chelyabinsk Zavod ChTZ to produce engines and transmissions and assemble tanks. By the beginning of the war KhPZ mastered the production of T-34 and STZ mastered production.
          1. andj61 30 October 2015 19: 22 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Amurets
            At the beginning of the war there were 1960 T-34 tanks and 646 KV-1 and KV-2 tanks.

            Only the T-34s were somewhat not the ones that were recognized as the best tank of the Second World War. And the engine resource was first 50, then 100 hours. Yes, and the combat use of tanks - the Germans had the most advanced, and in our 41st - long outdated. The Germans mainly counted on this.
            1. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 09: 41 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: andj61
              And the engine resource was first 50, then 100 hours.

              The life of the AM-35 aircraft engine was fifty hours. Please note that this is the operation of the engine in forced mode. If you reduce the speed to an average, then the engine resource increases three times, and this is 150 hours. Read the tanker's memoirs: in one of the regiments there was a T-34 tank, on which the crew fought from the Moscow battle to the Vistula without changing the engine. True, on the march the tank was placed at the end of the column, the engine could put a smoke screen from the exhaust gases. When approaching the borders of Germany, in tank regiments, mechanic drivers were awarded medals "for military merit" if the engines worked for more than 400 hours. So then read all kinds of experts from history. Yes, foreign aircraft engines had resources in two or three more than ours - it is not debatable, but in the aviation regiments where they served Tomahawks, Spitfires, A-20 Bostons and others, it was necessary to create laboratories for oil refining and fuel filtration . It is a pity that this was not in the autobuses, the “Students” would go longer. There was no maintenance culture in the army.
          2. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 09: 28 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Amurets
            At the beginning of the war there were 1960 T-34 and 646 tanks KV-1 and KV-2

            Quote: Amurets
            By the beginning of the war KhPZ mastered the production of T-34 and STZ mastered production.

            Is that so? Is the release of 1960 tanks just mastering production? a test of the pen, so to speak?
            If you put the 1960 T-34 tanks in one line at a distance of 4 meters from each other, you get a system in 13 720 meters.
        2. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 09: 18 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Quote: aleks 62 next
          .Germans knew about the T-34.

          They didn’t know, but they began to guess after our commission for the purchase of the latest technology, having bought the T-III and T-IV tanks, began stubbornly asking them to show them the latest rather than obsolete tanks, which prompted the German side to think that the USSR had much more advanced technique.
          At the same time, I will answer the Amur: the presence of 1960 tanks, this is not at all like "It was in service." Pay attention to the German 1941 photographs of the year, there is a photograph of a whole train of T-34 on railway platforms. But the German “Wehrmacht”, inspired by the first successes, did not even notice this acquisition. Also, we did not notice the effect of the fact that someone from the command did not even bother to drive the ready train with the latest tanks to the rear. Or maybe General Pavlov worried that they would go to the enemy.
          1. polkovnik manuch 2 November 2015 08: 11 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            You don’t need so much about the late general, he was not the first violin, although he knew much more than in the NSS.
      4. morozik 30 October 2015 22: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        this is called warning coloring ... the point is to explain to morons - that there will be no winners
      5. vex
        vex 30 October 2015 23: 30 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This is a warning to Europeans - do not waste time and money on dummies, it is better to be friends with us, it is in your interests.
    5. mishaia_23 30 October 2015 16: 44 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      If infa went, then the development is already in full growth, but
      1. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 09: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: mishaia_23
        If info went already

        a newer technique has been developed, but it has yet to be adopted. One woman said that her husband is serving in the regiment where the latest tanks are being mastered, so when she tells him: “Watch your new tanks on TV,” he replies: “If they show, they’re not the latest.”
    6. Tor5
      Tor5 30 October 2015 17: 10 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Usually such statements are made when there are already good practices or even prototypes.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. kodxnumx 30 October 2015 17: 20 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      If ours creates a system that when turned on will turn off vision heads and interrupt communications from satellites that control the rocket, this will be 100% obscene to the United States and the whole world. If the rocket is already flying across Russia to the target, it’s not even necessary to intercept it, it will just turn on the equipment along the route and everything, the rocket loses its connection with the satellite, and the brain of the rocket is also out of order! With such devices, the S-400 will not be needed, why should the missile be intercepted when an object enters the field of action of the device and that's it became scrap metal for 1.000.000 green
      1. igor.borov775 30 October 2015 18: 01 New
        • -7
        • 0
        -7
        Beautifully written but utter nonsense. Explicitly completely missing logic. It’s a beautiful fairy tale about Hotabych. Although, as far as I remember, one President of the United States also blundered like that. We’ll return the missiles back if we need to. Well, it’s like star wars of one politician.
        1. Aleksey_K 30 October 2015 23: 40 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: igor.borov775
          Beautifully written but utter nonsense. Explicitly completely missing logic. It’s a beautiful fairy tale about Hotabych. Although, as far as I remember, one President of the United States also blundered like that. We’ll return the missiles back if we need to. Well, it’s like star wars of one politician.

          Only you answer, without Hottabychy, why suddenly the crew from Donald Cook began to quit the US Navy. Well, they left the ship without communication, well, all the electronics with computers stopped working, well, the ship lost speed. What because of this, they are dismissed from the army and refuse military social security (pensions and other benefits)?
          Draw conclusions - it means there was a psychotronic effect on the crew, fear and hysteria arose, which led to premature dismissals.
          Hottabych obviously has nothing to do with it. But the Su-24 seemed to have something to do with it.
          1. mav1971 31 October 2015 16: 38 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Quote: igor.borov775
            Beautifully written but utter nonsense. Explicitly completely missing logic. It’s a beautiful fairy tale about Hotabych. Although, as far as I remember, one President of the United States also blundered like that. We’ll return the missiles back if we need to. Well, it’s like star wars of one politician.

            Only you answer, without Hottabychy, why suddenly the crew from Donald Cook began to quit the US Navy. Well, they left the ship without communication, well, all the electronics with computers stopped working, well, the ship lost speed. What because of this, they are dismissed from the army and refuse military social security (pensions and other benefits)?
            Draw conclusions - it means there was a psychotronic effect on the crew, fear and hysteria arose, which led to premature dismissals.
            Hottabych obviously has nothing to do with it. But the Su-24 seemed to have something to do with it.


            In order not to look so stupid as you "drew" now - look on the Internet for the source of your "knowledge".
            Where did this information come from?
            Look at the route of the destroyer, how he walked, with whom he walked.
            You will need to spend one evening on this - but you will immediately - for the rest of your life you will become much smarter and more reasonable.
            You just learn to think!
          2. igor.borov775 31 October 2015 17: 58 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            The KRET specialist explained simply and intelligibly. They were not able to identify the destroyer. For them, the plane came out of nowhere. In principle, such a technique was demonstrated by the Far East in front of the US aircraft carrier. They also drove one plane, even raised a shift on duty. He left and suddenly all of a sudden two SU-24s walked low next to this community. And now you can safely imagine how the Great Lords of the Oceans felt. Agree clearly not festive.
      2. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 09: 53 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Gorbachev, once in power, said: “We have developments that can affect the gyroscopes of strategic enemy missiles and set the polarity reversal, and then instead of flying to the East, the missiles will fly to the West. But since then Such infa was only the second time since the time of Gorbi.
    9. Maxom75 30 October 2015 17: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      If this is true, then this is the most effective answer.
    10. Alex_Rarog 30 October 2015 18: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, what if we are lagging behind in electronic gadgets for the army, then let the enemy also not be able to use them))) correctly) soldier
  2. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 15: 12 New
    • 26
    • 0
    +26
    Who doubted that the American one was cunning ... ABM would be ours ... KRET with a screw ?;)
    1. vladnn2015 30 October 2015 15: 16 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Russian Federation is a world leader

      And they need to stay, otherwise ....
    2. Truth 30 October 2015 15: 22 New
      • 18
      • 0
      +18
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      what about the American cunning ... PRO there is ours ...

      Well, this is almost the same story about the chain of confrontation:
      On a sly ass - pisyun with a screw,
      On pisyun with a screw - butt with turns,
      On the ass with turns - pisyun with a navigator,
      On pisyun with a navigator - a priest with labyrinths,
      ... and so on, it all depends on the ingenuity and speed of implementation of the idea.
      1. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 15: 31 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Agree, colleague, in terms of creative thinking, our people have no equal! Especially in terms of how someone’s cunning ... PRO put a bolt on the bolt!
        1. Amurets 30 October 2015 17: 20 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
          Agree, colleague, in terms of creative thinking, our people have no equal! Especially in terms of how someone’s cunning ... PRO put a bolt on the bolt!

          This is especially true for something to turn your head away. And in childhood, you must see what is inside. And God himself ordered the adults; to put a pig to someone.
          1. Bort radist 30 October 2015 17: 55 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Amurets
            And in childhood, be sure to see what's inside.

            Well, here an example is not in our favor. Someone threw expired mountain rescuers (gas mask) into a landfill. The boys began to disassemble. One was left without a hand, burned his face with loss of vision. 7 years old kid. Mother is one and three brothers. They threw themselves in the city to help.
        2. Bort radist 30 October 2015 17: 28 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
          in terms of creative thinking, our people have no equal!

          There were complaints that there were tubes of toothpaste empty - marriage. They gathered foreign engineers who created the conveyor, outlined the problem - to detect an empty tube. Two months later, they mounted and started the system. All products passed through the scales with a lower weight, the conveyor stopped. A week later, empty tubes stopped coming across. They ordered to know the reason. The peasants were tired of the jerking of the conveyor, they put a fan in and a stream of air began to blow away empty tubes.
          1. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 20: 29 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            That is exactly what I had in mind. If you need to come up with a simple solution to a complex problem - ours is second to none. Remember the pencil in space.
            1. Kent0001 30 October 2015 20: 50 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              A pencil in space is, I tell you, a classic.
            2. Aleksey_K 30 October 2015 23: 58 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
              That is exactly what I had in mind. If you need to come up with a simple solution to a complex problem - ours is second to none. Remember the pencil in space.

              Of course, this is a solution to a problem that at that stage was difficult or impossible to solve. But if an unscrupulous astronaut begins to wipe his pencil notes, then no one will ever figure out the problem that arose in space. If you watched the programs about astronauts, you would have noticed that not all the crews were friendly, there were quarrels and premature landing of the crews. So there were astronauts capable of forging their own pencil notes.
              Even Gagarin's understudy, German Titov, was terribly angry at Gagarin and literally "growled" at him for being the first.
              Here we are - people.
            3. mav1971 31 October 2015 16: 41 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
              That is exactly what I had in mind. If you need to come up with a simple solution to a complex problem - ours is second to none. Remember the pencil in space.


              The tale about the Ford specialist that the conveyor in Gorky restored - remind?

              Enough of exclusivity.
              If we traveled around the world, I think they saw how clever a thought is for all people. Whatever the place.
          2. Aleksey_K 30 October 2015 23: 50 New
            • -4
            • 0
            -4
            Quote: Bort Radist
            There were complaints that there were tubes of toothpaste empty - marriage. They gathered foreign engineers who created the conveyor, outlined the problem - to detect an empty tube. Two months later, they mounted and started the system. All products passed through the scales with a lower weight, the conveyor stopped. A week later, empty tubes stopped coming across. They ordered to know the reason. The peasants were tired of the jerking of the conveyor, they put a fan in and a stream of air began to blow away empty tubes.

            A beautiful joke, but no more. If there is a reason for the appearance of empty tubes, then they do not solve the problem of removing these tubes from the conveyor, but decide how to prevent the appearance of empty tubes. Those. how to make sure all tubes are filled.
            So all this fictional joke is complete nonsense.
        3. morozik 30 October 2015 23: 12 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          in the meantime, diplomats are opening, we have trial trainingand ... that sounds good!
          1. kolyhalovs 31 October 2015 21: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            How interesting! gluing from all cameras takes place at the same time. And what's so secret about it when the container is already almost rose vertically?
            1. shasherin.pavel 1 November 2015 10: 11 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              On 0: 40 there is no slip, but on others there is a sharp jump. But this camera is at the bottom and apparently does not fall under some kind of signal, but the cameras above are receiving some kind of effect - a microscopic stop of recording. Something electronic is turning on at this moment, but having an upward direction ...
              1. kolyhalovs 2 November 2015 06: 19 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                There is a slip. Not at 40 seconds, but at 44.
  3. AdekvatNICK 30 October 2015 15: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    here it is an arms race. Now America will begin to think how to get ahead of this KRET system
  4. VNP1958PVN 30 October 2015 15: 17 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    But can’t this be unobtrusively demonstrated? For example, how did “Caliber” fly? wassat Much more effective and intelligible! And no statements are needed! Immediately everyone who needs it, everyone understood!
    1. demo 30 October 2015 15: 42 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Optimal:
      "Turned on the system for a couple of seconds, turned off and the floor of Europe are sitting without the Internet, and without air navigation, etc."

      What do you think will come?
      1. dvina71 30 October 2015 18: 47 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: demo
        "Turned on the system for a couple of seconds, turned off and the floor of Europe are sitting without the Internet, and without air navigation, etc."


        This could be done even when I served .. the end of the 80s. In Cuba, Fidel asked our help to solve the problem with TiViMARTY .., ours did not immediately do. Apparently they were settling with Moscow .. For several days in the towns below Maimi there was no radio, tv .. but there was white noise ..)) As soon as TviMarti stopped broadcasting to Cuba, these towns began to live their old lives.
      2. mav1971 31 October 2015 16: 48 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: demo
        Optimal:
        "Turned on the system for a couple of seconds, turned off and the floor of Europe are sitting without the Internet, and without air navigation, etc."

        What do you think will come?


        Have you tried to think?
        Why did the Soviet Union begin to make an atomic bomb very quickly?
        Can you give a normal answer?
        I will give it for you.
        Because such a powerful weapon, unsurpassed at that time, was in the hands of a potential enemy.
        Threat to national security.
        Direct and unambiguous.
        And ours began to catch up.
        In making a bomb.
        In the development of means to prevent nuclear weapons carriers from reaching the USSR - air defense, missile defense, missile defense, etc.


        so here
        If we have a system that can easily turn off the missile defense / air defense \ communications \ navigation system, this will be a threat to the national security of any country in the world.
        And they will by all means catch up and prevent.
        This is the point of view of a normal person.
        No one will allow himself to live in fear that he will be slammed at any moment.
        Both Russian and German, French, American.
        Think about it.
        At least just think!
    2. vyinemeynen 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      But can’t this be unobtrusively demonstrated?


      And airplanes with innocent men get caught, those who die in intensive care will die! Do not we feel sorry? .......... but demonstrated! If the joke is not very successful!
      If not a joke, take away Claudia!
    3. skifd 30 October 2015 17: 25 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      But can’t this be unobtrusively demonstrated?


      So, judging by the statements of "partners (!)", They have already been "pleased" with the capabilities of some new products ?! And we see by their reaction, they are "delighted" .. wassat
  5. ASG7 30 October 2015 15: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The era of the Great Hybridization - when grandiose Soviet developments in the analogue component are combined with the most powerful digital control apparatus of the modern era.
  6. Azitral 30 October 2015 15: 25 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It is quite expected. Aegis is a masterpiece! The SM-3s delivered in its set are the best in their class. But they have an Achilles heel, which they will not be able to get rid of in the next 10 years. She is MANAGED. Not homing. Of course, it is controlled by a computer complex, but GROUND. Here is a paradox. Any failure, distortion in the channel - and this thing will miss the target. How to make a rocket with such self-guiding characteristics does not even show any real ways.
    1. Bashibuzuk 30 October 2015 15: 41 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Does the self-guiding one have channels of information collection?
      Before processing, it is necessary to assemble.
      Before you collect, you need to know what we, in fact, expect to collect.
      Then, appropriately create the conditions for generating the information field.
      .
      Now let’s imagine that the information field is jammed - Zemfira, say. Or a magnetron. crazy about impunity.
      Or a company of heavy earthmoving equipment with inflatable mountains.
      And who will collect what.
      .
      Optics to fool too much mind is not necessary. They make a fool even in the movies.
      .
      So far, in the homing head a big-headed, farsighted man (ee or woman) does not sit down - no homing.
      And what kamikazes are capable of - we all know.
      Read here.
      .
      So it turns out - a sly left-hand crankshaft.
      ....
      That's why publication - we are right now .. we all xxx
    2. Black Colonel 30 October 2015 17: 22 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      And someone will say how once Swan snuckle: "Well this is necessary, DO NOT GET TO THE COUNTRY!" (NATO war with Yugoslavia, when the "axes" flew to Greece and Bulgaria)
    3. SSeT 31 October 2015 00: 31 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      DOES IJIS THE GROUND MANAGED COMPLEX? You are drunk, oversleep! This is the entire ship system, from the ground it can only be the control center
      The present "problems" of Aegis are only due to the fact that he was created according to current and prospective tasks of TOGO time. And he coped with them with a bang, and was the best and unattainable to us, unfortunately
      1. NIKNN 31 October 2015 10: 34 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        You are right of course. Aegis, in the translation of Aegis there is a naval multifunctional combat information-control system, this is so, but without land, space and other means, it is not realistic to fight ballistic missiles. Once again, this is BIUS, not PRO. and she herself is "trying to integrate" into missile defense. Apparently this is what the author had in mind, and if he drank beer, God grant him good health wink . You plus for technical literacy observation. hi
      2. mav1971 31 October 2015 16: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: SSeT
        DOES IJIS THE GROUND MANAGED COMPLEX? You are drunk, oversleep! This is the entire ship system, from the ground it can only be the control center
        The present "problems" of Aegis are only due to the fact that he was created according to current and prospective tasks of TOGO time. And he coped with them with a bang, and was the best and unattainable to us, unfortunately


        But what about Aegis, placed in the ground version?
        Aegis Ashore is called.
        It’s already standing in Romania and will stand in Poland.
        So in vain you then ran into a person.
        1. polkovnik manuch 2 November 2015 08: 20 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Add it, it will stand up to the hour “X”, and then there will be a steaming pit. So, politicians and the ruling elite of the Panovshchina and Gypsy region, before placing missile defense systems on their territory (and other MEMBERS of the alliance), you need to think with your head, and not that . what are they sitting on.
  7. bronik 30 October 2015 15: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    First, they showed the whole world in work, and then announced the availability. Bravo!
  8. exalex2 30 October 2015 15: 26 New
    • -10
    • 0
    -10
    Yes Yes. So many years of chatter .. And "suddenly" a miracle appeared .. It does not happen ..
  9. MIKHAN 30 October 2015 15: 31 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    Here are the mattresses for you ... This is just the "tip of the iceberg" .. And what else is there, no one knows ..
    1. retardu 30 October 2015 17: 25 New
      • -10
      • 0
      -10
      Great movie, at the level of American cartoons about superweapons with only poor graphics
      1. _Voislav_ 31 October 2015 21: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Because it’s good that the wrapper is so-so, and the filling is lovely with a twist ...
  10. slizhov 30 October 2015 15: 32 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    MDA ...
    the next puncture of the Pentogon ...
    ISIS created, invested billions - everything in the sands, as if through fingers ...
    In Ukraine, they fucked up - a complete hole ...
    Build, Build Aircraft carriers ... - and what now, when they are grazed by our "observers" - bang and ... not by !!!
    PRO, pro, pro ... with his busyness of places, as one ambassador put it and - AGAIN IN THE DEEP REAR ...
    The people of America will soon refuse to contain these brave guys who are not afraid of the whole Russian! :)
    1. Are
      Are 1 November 2015 11: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The people of America do not participate in the maintenance of "these gallant guys: no one has transferred such rights to him. The Pentagon does not have a puncture, it’s just a scientific and technical experiment. It didn’t work out - they will ask for money aggressively and get as much as necessary (I want )
  11. pts-m 30 October 2015 15: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    the flag of the imposition of an arms race has passed to Russia! In vain pin.dos thrust lit torches into the taiga. they are extinguished right there, since Russia has more experience in extinguishing fires.
  12. Lecha57 30 October 2015 15: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Tsyntrobalt” showed its capabilities. And woe to the one who did not realize.
  13. mpzss 30 October 2015 15: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    on the Internet, here’s what I found: http://by24.org/2015/10/28/no_more_nuclear_weapons_in_russia/ and I realized that we have teachers at our universities who CONSCIOUSLY teach our students not in good faith, so that everything that he talks about comes true He speaks!!!!!!!!!! In principle, the ministers of education help them with this! It's a shame, damn it!
    And with this professor of the Department of Natural and Technosphere Safety and Risk Management of the Russian State Technological University, Peter Belov, we need to figure out who gave him such data about our weapons and, most importantly, about what the Americans are going to do!
    1. skifd 30 October 2015 17: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: mpzss
      And with this professor of the Department of Natural and Technosphere Safety and Risk Management of the Russian State Technological University, Peter Belov, we need to figure out who gave him such data about our weapons and, most importantly, about what the Americans are going to do!


      Oh my God, because if that “Google” is to help, and everything will become clear with this “AcadEmicomm” ...
      Follow the link, and do not worry.

      http://www.onolitegi.ru/component/content/article/124-akademik-geopoliticheskih-
      problem.html

      And apart from UA and BY, nobody is discussing this "chilling soul" news hotly.
      Well, on the "censor" it’s understandable, "crap" pErEmokhga laughing wassat !
  14. BOB044 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1

    Yuri Maevsky:
    KRET is ready to build and supply high-performance means and electronic warfare systems of various bases to neutralize missile defense elements in Europe.
    Well, gentlemen from NATO, it’s time to get a proctologist to see a doctor. laughing
  15. Altona 30 October 2015 15: 52 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    These Americans are funny, the right word, with their naive dreams ...
    1. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 20: 50 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      The grandmother is old, the grandmother knows life, the grandmother will not advise bad!
    2. SSeT 31 October 2015 00: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      By the way, that’s exactly what they always do (Americans). They have wise grandmothers, they bring up granddaughters correctly, ours are just shy (sometimes)
  16. dchegrinec 30 October 2015 15: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We need to create such a weapon so that it answers silently to all this Western nonsense addressed to us, only so that for some reason the talkers stop ... and they asked for mercy!
  17. Tummyr 30 October 2015 16: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Our campaign found a "flying saucer", and different "gifts" for our "partners" rivet from it. bully
  18. cniza 30 October 2015 16: 11 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Here are the mattresses for you ... This is just the "tip of the iceberg" .. And what else is there, no one knows ..



    It is interesting when they turn away where they fall and where it explodes?
    1. MIKHAN 30 October 2015 17: 20 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: cniza
      It is interesting when they turn away where they fall and where it explodes?

      to the take-off point ...
    2. xenod55 30 October 2015 20: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It is interesting when they turn away where they fall and where it explodes? - HERE it is very necessary to work on this QUESTION. WHAT WOULD, what “turned away” flew THERE, FROM WHERE departed, and there it exploded.
  19. APASUS 30 October 2015 16: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I consider infa an element of the information war that ours has quite successfully begun to use recently. This is such a multi-factorial multi-path, this is, so to speak, a message to who needs it.
  20. 787nkx 30 October 2015 16: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Some kind of invention or development already,
    likely to interfere
    early detection and further destruction of targets?

    ABM rather than a concrete piece of iron
    and the concept can also counteract it,
    but already shock, or shockproof, somehow.

    At the moment, the only way to overcome missile defense (air defense), etc.,
    this is a shock multiple quantitatively exceeding the capabilities of the shock.
    1. 31rus 30 October 2015 17: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You are wrong, the concept contains real components, these are Aegis, missile defense, control systems, ACS, and finally the control and communication centers themselves and all these are highly automated systems that can simply be destroyed or simply disabled or blocked, which phrases are cheaper because many parameters are known, so everything is feasible
  21. kizhe 30 October 2015 16: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done! Let the reptiles crush in all directions.
  22. sergeyzzz 30 October 2015 16: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The spruce trees say that they most likely already have it, they just knock out financing for this business.
  23. ma_shlomha 30 October 2015 16: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    President Vladimir Putin instructed to replenish stocks of funds to protect citizens from nuclear threats. It is also necessary to take an inventory and understand what means are morally and technically outdated, Putin set the task. He made such a statement at a meeting of the Security Council, Interfax reports.
  24. roskot 30 October 2015 16: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It turns out that the Americans wereted money on the wind on missile defense.
    1. retardu 30 October 2015 17: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yeah, not only is it not known when the "miracle" will appear.
      all the more it is not known which side of the eb will reduce the effectiveness of missile defense to 0
      1. MIKHAN 30 October 2015 17: 29 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: retardu
        Yeah, not only is it not known when the "miracle" will appear.
        all the more it is not known which side of the eb will reduce the effectiveness of missile defense to 0

        We in Russia love to "be strange" ...
    2. igor.borov775 30 October 2015 18: 55 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Who said to the empty. Nothing of the kind. These missile defense-based areas are a very bad system. Universal vertical launch systems are laid there. And the IJIS missile detection and control system has been constantly improved and modernized since 1983. This system is by far the most advanced. Yes, there are problems, but the United States is engaged in these matters with might and main. By the way, the USSR never completely trusted these electronic brains and Control Systems had another principle that completely eliminated this fuss with electronic warfare. Another redundant control system where there are no chips. But this is due to a lag in electronic circuit boards in control systems from the United States. Only after the Cold War did the Yankees learn such shocking news. The PRO area is PANDORA'S BOX. No allies will know what weapon systems are in these areas except the United States. push. And the most important decision-making time is much shorter than when Europe launched ground-based ax launch tables. And it is not in vain called Advanced basing. WHAT. And REB will not close everyone. He can close one place pointly if he succeeds. Such features of this system. No one hid the improvement work. But it’s also impossible to solve problems there. As far as I understand, there is propaganda fuss. retrofitting hurried means only one thing. Enemy at the Gates.
      1. dvina71 30 October 2015 20: 49 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: igor.borov775
        . By the way, the USSR never completely trusted these electronic brains and Control Systems had another principle that completely eliminated this fuss with electronic warfare. Another redundant control system where there are no chips.

        This is not due to the mythical lag .. (how is it already tired of chewing). A normal backup system is not based on the same principles as the main one. This is the basis of dubbing. This is the first.
        The second one. There was no competition in electronics between the USSR and the USA. Everyone went their own way.
        Take an interest in the leisure of a bot computer of the first Ka-50 and what the Americans had at that time ..
        1. SSeT 31 October 2015 00: 46 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          When he just flew, without a completed “Whirlwind”, Apaches already flew series D. Take an interest in what he had on board, then felasoifsuyte. Iksperd sofa
          1. dvina71 31 October 2015 00: 57 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: SSeT
            Iksperd sofa


            And then the Apache mid 90X? The Ka-50 of the first release is 10 years older. And it was actually not about the Whirlwind, but the on-board computer .. Do you, expert, have anything on this subject ... or so ... did you pass by?
  25. sa-ag 30 October 2015 17: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Mayevsky himself said that any radiating device is direction-finding, so this is the most electronic warfare double-edged weapon
  26. Bort radist 30 October 2015 18: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: sa-ag
    so this is the most eb double-edged weapon

    Double-edged is not as scary as a double-edged sword.
  27. mihasik
    mihasik 30 October 2015 18: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    KRET is ready to build and supply high-performance means and electronic warfare systems of various bases to neutralize missile defense elements in Europe.

    If so? That's cool!
  28. IAlex 30 October 2015 18: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And besides populist pathos speeches, this very KRET demonstrated something in defense of what was said ???
    1. SSeT 31 October 2015 00: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Exactly! I can also say that I’m ready to supply plasma guns. and KRET has not done anything except the old Soviet backlogs. Will do - we'll see, but for now it's just a chatter
      1. dvina71 31 October 2015 01: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: SSeT
        and KRET has not done anything besides the old Soviet backlogs


        http://kret.com/ru/products/
        Are there many Soviet backlogs?
  29. Sagittarius YaNAO 30 October 2015 18: 50 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    On the "cookie" tested, now in a series.
  30. Old26 30 October 2015 18: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: vyinemeynen
    Such statements look strange (either disa for their own, or infa for strangers).

    Most likely, both of them, but disinformation for their own people is most in demand. The main thing is that they will not check their own what they promised there.

    Quote: retardu
    all the more it is not known which side of the eb will reduce the effectiveness of missile defense to 0

    In-in. The electronic warfare system will nullify the missile defense system of American interceptors. especially when you consider that they operate in the infrared range and the basis is the observation of “hotter” warheads in the background of “cold space”. Here at once EW drowns everything, then again and so on ad infinitum ...

    Quote: ma_shlomha
    President Vladimir Putin instructed to replenish stocks of funds to protect citizens from nuclear threats. It is also necessary to take an inventory and understand what means are morally and technically outdated, Putin set the task. He made such a statement at a meeting of the Security Council, Interfax reports.

    Check what, for the most part, has been gone for 15-20 years? A very urgent task. Morally and technically outdated ... How to put it mildly, so as not to swear ...
    1. dvina71 30 October 2015 21: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Old26

      In-in. The electronic warfare system will nullify the missile defense system of American interceptors. especially when you consider that they operate in the infrared range and the basis is the observation of "hotter" warheads in the background of "cold space"

      What is this nonsense? What are warheads in space? What are you talking about? They are definitely not hot there and fly in a cloud of false targets. Yes, their missile defense (European) is not designed for this. Here their task is to shoot down our rockets on take-off .. So far they cannot do this. The speed of their missile defense does not allow them to catch up with the strategist who has started. But as time goes on, they are dying of hyperweapons .. then they will be in time. We don’t know what the missile defense system in Europe is or will stand there, hence the kipish.
      What KRET wants to surprise them with ... well, they certainly won't say. EW's job is to find a weak spot and break it there. It can be assumed that the weak point is that missile defense missiles require adjustment in flight, this can be broken. Purely my guess.
  31. efimich41 30 October 2015 19: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Recall that earlier the US authorities said that the Euro missile defense system is not directed against the Russian Federation, and its creation is associated with the "Iranian nuclear projects."

    May return strategic missiles to Cuba, this will help to worry the US authorities.
  32. Old26 30 October 2015 20: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: efimich41
    May return strategic missiles to Cuba, this will help to worry the US authorities.

    Strategic missiles to Cuba? How do you imagine that? Our took and transported to Cuba "Poplar"? But nothing if, in response to the territory of any of the NATO countries, land launchers for the same Trident appear. and in the Baltic states or Poland - the BRSD, such as in Turkey, plus in Romania and Bulgaria, plus in Georgia? Plus, in all these countries, Tomahawks.
    Does this bother us ??? Maybe you need to think first before offering?
    1. Mikhail Krapivin 30 October 2015 20: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You know, there is a deep impression that all this will happen anyway. They will build a missile defense system, and then under its cover they will begin to move all kinds of different things to our borders in order to make us live in a fabulous light. So maybe all the same missiles to Cuba, so that later they wouldn’t have enough?
      1. dvina71 30 October 2015 21: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        So maybe all the same missiles to Cuba, so that later they wouldn’t have enough?

        What for? In the presence of an SSBN ..
  33. Old26 30 October 2015 21: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: dvina71
    What is this nonsense? What are warheads in space? What are you talking about? They are definitely not hot there and fly in a cloud of false targets.

    Suppose, dear, you are talking nonsense. What warheads in space, and where do you think they fly in the atmosphere? Take a look at the American interceptor guidance system at the same time? And I did not write that they are hot. The phrase sounded like they hotter on the background "cold space"? What do quotation marks mean in such a sentence hoping you know? The phrase means that warheads have a higher temperature than the surrounding space. Precise guidance is provided by a matrix cooled infrared seeker. It is she who makes it possible to identify these “hotter” BGs against the background of “cold space”
    Flying in a cloud of false goals - it could even be. But here is the detail. The cloud of false targets is mainly for locators, it is they that give the light on its screen. But what can the pieces of foil do against the infrared seeker ???
    Moreover, Americans are trying to intercept not at the final, but at least in the middle section of the trajectory.

    Quote: dvina71
    Yes, their missile defense (European) is not designed for this. Here their task is to shoot down our rockets on take-off .. So far they cannot do this. The speed of their anti-ballistic missiles does not allow them to catch up with the launched strategist.

    If we talk about the tasks of Euro-missile defense - it is not designed to defeat Russian ICBMs at all. Then you correctly said that they have the wrong speeds. The task of shooting down on take-off until they have been solved not so much because of the low speed of the flight, but because of the location of the target and the interceptor. They are too far from the trajectory. In the future, they want to try using the increased energy of Block 2B to try to do this by placing carriers near the trajectory of our ICBMs. But so far this is far.
    As for the speed of anti-ballistic missiles, now they already have anti-ballistic missiles capable of catching up with our ICBMs. But fortunately, they only have them in the United States, they did not begin to make the third positional area in Europe with such interceptors ...
    1. dvina71 30 October 2015 22: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Suppose, dear, you are talking nonsense. What warheads in space, and where do you think they fly in the atmosphere?


      Apparently I didn’t express myself in the topropy accurately .. It was about your stupidity .. to hit blocks in space, pointing at them in the heat .. This is a rare nonsense .. LCs have long been no pieces of foil ..
      Quote: Old26
      If we talk about the tasks of Euro missile defense - then it is not designed to defeat Russian ICBMs

      that’s exactly what it’s designed for. What missiles do they have in PUs, how do you know? Have you been reported to the Pentagon? And it doesn’t even matter what they have now. The US has no goal of attacking the Russian Federation right tomorrow .. there is a long-term multidisciplinary work. In terms of missile defense .. it is not known what kind of missiles they will have in 10-15 years, and the bases are already standing. It is this fact that harnesses.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. Old26 30 October 2015 22: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: dvina71
    We don’t know what the missile defense system in Europe is or will stand there, hence the kipish.

    There they can only have 2 types of missiles. Interceptors and missiles of the Tomahawk type. The former are useless against Russian missiles, and the latter against Russia. In order to hit something on the territory of Russia, they would need to set them kilometers 400 north. So, whether we like it or not, the positional area in Romania is adapted against Iran’s infantry-fighting division (others simply don’t have anything like that).
    Well, the delusional proposal that can be put on the “Standards” of the Yabzinskiy Pond is purely delusional. The interceptor’s payload is so miserable (half a kilogram, or even less), that if you use the components of the ballistic missile system, then you will have such a tiny mass that a rocket with such a charge will become simply economically disadvantageous

    Quote: dvina71
    they will say. EW's job is to find a weak spot and break it there. It can be assumed that the weak point is that missile defense missiles require adjustment in flight, this can be broken. Purely my guess.

    You can assume anything, but for some reason, speaking about our weapons, we a priori believe that the data transmission means are so secure that the enemy will not be able to intervene, and the enemy thinks that the systems are so unprotected that we can neutralize them. And the radius of action of electronic warfare, we sometimes consider so large ....
    1. dvina71 30 October 2015 22: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Old26
      You can assume anything, but for some reason, speaking about our weapons, we a priori believe that the data transmission means are so secure that the enemy will not be able to intervene, and the enemy thinks that the systems are so unprotected that we can neutralize them. And the radius of action of electronic warfare, we sometimes consider so large ....

      It is possible by the facts .. In the direction of the aerospace forces in Syria there is no ONE launch of MANPADS .. Even by helicopters. But the fact that the various groups that have plundered a single military depot do not have MANPADS ... it is hard to believe. And on the Syrian Air Force they shoot back regularly .. the rollers are laid out on YouTube .. They don’t even shoot from the ATGMs with helicopters, and yet they have them and they are used against aircraft from other countries.
      SPS KRET ..
  36. Mestny 30 October 2015 23: 34 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: igor.borov775
    As long as I understand, there is propaganda fuss. And the fact that they hurried with the re-equipment means only one thing. Enemy at the Gates.

    Well, how so?
    If the Americans advertise their weapons, even what is in the project is a competent advertising move, so that everyone is afraid, and generally well done.
    And if ours, then - propaganda fuss, at first do then speak, and in general everything is bad with us.
  37. Dimon19661 31 October 2015 05: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: dvina71
    Quote: Old26
    You can assume anything, but for some reason, speaking about our weapons, we a priori believe that the data transmission means are so secure that the enemy will not be able to intervene, and the enemy thinks that the systems are so unprotected that we can neutralize them. And the radius of action of electronic warfare, we sometimes consider so large ....

    It is possible by the facts .. In the direction of the aerospace forces in Syria there is no ONE launch of MANPADS .. Even by helicopters. But the fact that the various groups that have plundered a single military depot do not have MANPADS ... it is hard to believe. And on the Syrian Air Force they shoot back regularly .. the rollers are laid out on YouTube .. They don’t even shoot from the ATGMs with helicopters, and yet they have them and they are used against aircraft from other countries.
    SPS KRET ..

    And where does the MANPADS and REB systems do not mix everything into one salad. At the moment, independent of the country of manufacture are monitored individually (we must pay tribute to the United States) and therefore there are no launches on the airborne forces. Getting into a helicopter with MANPADS is a great success, and seriously consider such a way to deal with LA is stupid.
  38. valsh 31 October 2015 07: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Bort Radist
    Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
    in terms of creative thinking, our people have no equal!

    There were complaints that there were tubes of toothpaste empty - marriage. They gathered foreign engineers who created the conveyor, outlined the problem - to detect an empty tube. Two months later, they mounted and started the system. All products passed through the scales with a lower weight, the conveyor stopped. A week later, empty tubes stopped coming across. They ordered to know the reason. The peasants were tired of the jerking of the conveyor, they put a fan in and a stream of air began to blow away empty tubes.

    True or not, but the example is simply magnificent !!!
  39. Felix 31 October 2015 08: 44 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Алексей_К
    Quote: Bort Radist
    There were complaints that there were tubes of toothpaste empty - marriage. They gathered foreign engineers who created the conveyor, outlined the problem - to detect an empty tube. Two months later, they mounted and started the system. All products passed through the scales with a lower weight, the conveyor stopped. A week later, empty tubes stopped coming across. They ordered to know the reason. The peasants were tired of the jerking of the conveyor, they put a fan in and a stream of air began to blow away empty tubes.

    A beautiful joke, but no more. If there is a reason for the appearance of empty tubes, then they do not solve the problem of removing these tubes from the conveyor, but decide how to prevent the appearance of empty tubes. Those. how to make sure all tubes are filled.
    So all this fictional joke is complete nonsense.


    Well ... not really. A similar problem in production is solved so that it turns out cheaper. If the percentage of empty tubes is small, it’s cheaper to install a fan.
  40. Dimon19661 31 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In many industries, marriage from the assembly line is blown away by air, this has been done for a long time, just take an interest in technological processes and there will be no jokes.
  41. Oleko 31 October 2015 14: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What element base is made on? Domestic used?
    1. sw247 31 October 2015 19: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In the second video, when the computer was turned on, the Windows boot melody played. It is hoped that this is the director's voice acting.
  42. Gormenghast 31 October 2015 16: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But we make rockets, and we conquer the Yenisei, and also in the field of ballet we are ahead of the rest (Vysotsky)

    It is very pleasing that electronic warfare systems are added to first-class missiles, first-class weapons, and advanced nuclear industry (both peaceful and military). smile
  43. Navy7981 31 October 2015 23: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Once a statement has been made about this, then it already exists. Such things are not reported ahead of time. Like, we are in a couple of years .... Like, we need to attack now ... So I think this statement is not for us, but for freaks.
  44. complete zero 1 November 2015 09: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t know how KRET is there, it’s quite possible that it’s PR, here not so long ago there was a comment of a Special Officer for this electronic warfare, and so not everyone there is so cloudless with these systems ... well, a pro duck is an advertised campaign like the program star warrior in the eighties ... Guaranteed protection against nuclear weapons simply does not exist
  45. stur 1 November 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How did you get with your abbreviations - CRET, REB, PRO, that you save bytes, too lazy to write - well, don’t write at all. In general, the information in the article is practically zero. Everyone has heard about the asymmetric answer. Do you have something specific? Spam and nothing more.
    1. complete zero 1 November 2015 10: 10 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      KRET is a Russian concern (how do you label it differently?) Based on your BMW proposal, it also needs to be decrypted))))
  46. Are
    Are 1 November 2015 11: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    New slogan: "KRET does not create anything that is directed against the USA and NATO !!"
    This must be inserted in response to the verbiage of NATO and its main master
  47. Denis Skiff 1 November 2015 16: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Dali
    Quote: full zero
    everything is clear with a radio fuse, it’s not clear that there are other missiles, because not only are they pointing along the “beam” but there are OLS (thermal head) how can they be detected?
    Look with 3m40s ... it turns out that the methods for guiding enemy missiles have nothing to do with it !!! Even if without guidance systems at all ...

    why then the tornado rs without volume detonation in the air explode not reaching the ground? how so
  48. derik1970 2 November 2015 06: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If only all KRET products did not turn out to be fiction on paper and self-promotion, because they use designs from the 60-70s, but they are mass-produced ... it’s sad that there are more than enough people who want to throw hats ... by the way, they really fool the homing head working in a TV signal or infrared range is not real ...
  49. polkovnik manuch 2 November 2015 08: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They said it means they’ll do it. The name of these systems in practice has already shown their high combat effectiveness! Scientists are sitting there, not "effective managers."