KRET declares readiness to create systems that reduce the effectiveness of eurPRO to zero

The commander of the US Air Force in Europe, General Frank Gorenk, spoke out that the Russian electronic warfare systems nullify all the advantages of high-tech weapons that are armed with NATO. "They closed the gap. “Our advantage in the air is melting,” the general said. “But what’s most alarming is their new ability to implement a strategy to restrict access to certain territories (A2 / AD)." An explanation is needed. The term A2 / AD in NATO means countering the admission of foreign troops to their territory (anti-access or A2) while limiting their effective actions on the territory if they could break through (area-denial or AD). In the West, primarily in the USA, it was believed that only they possess the secret of the implementation of the A2 / AD concept and will never allow enemy troops, from their point of view, to invade their borders. They themselves have the right to declare any region of the globe a zone of their vital interests. And, of course, to conduct unpunished hostilities there. The territory of our country was no exception. And then it turned out that not every plane or rocket could simply fly over the border of Russia, not to mention the use of precision strikes. An almost insurmountable obstacle is the invisible wall of various electronic warfare systems, which, using a fashionable expression, “carry the brain” to the “smartest” weapons available in NATO arsenals. Here is what Nikolai Kolesov, General Director of Radioelectronic Technologies Concern, says on this subject: “Russia does not plug any gaps. We rather return to the once abandoned position. EW tools are one of the key elements of the A2 / AD concept in the event of a confrontation with an adversary who is used to acting on an advantage in the sky and relying on high-precision weapons, as well as comprehensive and "deep" intelligence. However, electronic warfare can knock out all these trump cards from the hands of the aggressor, creating literally unbearable conditions for the so-called "projection of force." You can recall what the Reb technology today. Russian Aerospace Forces receive planes and helicopters, which, having special equipment, are able not only to provide individual protection, but also to cover entire areas, disrupting enemy communications, making reconnaissance and the use of high-precision weapons difficult. Such means include, for example, the unique Lever-AV helicopter complex, capable of “blinding” enemy radars at a distance of several hundred kilometers. The think tank of ground-based high-tech defense is the Moscow-1 electronic intelligence and control complex. Its capabilities allow radio-technical reconnaissance of airspace at a range of up to 400 km. The reconnaissance of target parameters is conducted in a passive mode, which ensures high stealth operation. After the detection of air targets, their parameters are transferred to other systems of electronic warfare, air defense and aviation. On the management of "Moscow-1" at the same time can be more than 7 electronic warfare systems. Among the things that Moscow-1 manages are mobile electronic warfare systems of the Krasukha family. They are capable of detecting and effectively suppressing the airborne radar of enemy aircraft at ranges of up to 300 km, preventing the detection of targets in the protected area and the use of weapons on them. The comprehensive and competent use of these systems does not allow the enemy to quickly hit the objects of state and military command, information infrastructure, the most important economic objects and means of retaliation. So the Russian Armed Forces own A2 / AD technology.

everything is clear with a radio fuse, it’s not clear that there are other missiles, because not only are they pointing along the “beam” but there are OLS (thermal head) how can they be detected?

There is a slip. Not at 40 seconds, but at 44.