Military Review

The guard ship "Admiral Grigorovich" successfully destroyed the naval target with the help of the rocket complex "Shtil"

42
Head of the Information Support Department of the Baltic Military District Press Service the fleet, 2nd-rank captain Vladimir Matveyev said that the crew of the latest patrol ship of project 11356 Admiral Grigorovich was able to successfully hit a full-sized naval target, which imitated the surface enemy’s surface ship, from the Shtil vertical-launch multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system, reports "Military Industrial Courier".




Missile firing was carried out as part of a state testing program at the Baltic Fleet's marine test sites. According to the ship’s crew and representatives of the industry, they were able to accomplish all of their tasks - a practical rocket without a warhead issued by the patrol ship successfully destroyed a surface target.

In addition, the calculation of the artillery complex A-190 hit a cruise target missile, which was launched by the Kuznetsk missile boat, immediately after its entry into the affected area.

After completion of state tests and an audit at the Admiral Grigorovich, the Naval flag will be raised, after which the patrol ship will become part of the Black Sea Fleet.

The lead ship of the 11356 project, Admiral Grigorovich, developed by Severnoye Design Bureau, was laid on the stocks of the Baltic shipyard Yantar 18 in December 2010, launched on March 14 in 2014. As part of its armament, the ship’s high-precision Kalibr-NK missile system, the multi-channel Shtil air-defense system and the Palash anti-aircraft missile and artillery complex, which are coordinated by the combat information and control system “Demand-M”.

In total, within the framework of two contracts with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, six such ships will be built, five of which have already been laid.
Photos used:
http://militaryrussia.ru/
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. marlin1203
    marlin1203 30 October 2015 08: 59
    +6
    And why should "Calm" fire at surface targets? Caliber-NK is not used for these purposes? And the 3m55 "Onyx" PCR was supposed to be installed on it. Or expensive? soldier
    1. Mitek
      Mitek 30 October 2015 09: 03
      17
      Quote: marlin1203
      And why should "Calm" fire at surface targets? Caliber-NK is not used for these purposes? And the 3m55 "Onyx" PCR was supposed to be installed on it. Or expensive? soldier

      What does the price have to do with it? Testing new weapons in different modes. Georgian missile boat was damaged by an anti-aircraft missile in August 2008. The approach is very true. Who knows what the situation may be in a battle?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 October 2015 09: 10
        +2
        Quote: Mitek
        Georgian missile boat was destroyed by an anti-aircraft missile in August 2008

        Che seriously?
        1. Mitek
          Mitek 30 October 2015 09: 13
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Mitek
          Georgian missile boat was destroyed by an anti-aircraft missile in August 2008

          Che seriously?

          To blame. Drowned anti-ship. They simply dragged the wasp, but there was no order to finish it off).
          1. GDP
            GDP 30 October 2015 10: 35
            +9
            One news after another! That "caliber" turns out to hit not 300 km, but one and a half thousand. Then suddenly the air defense system is calm, it turns out that it can be used for ground targets!
            What's next?!
            So you can see that with the 400-500 it can be used as an Iskander analogue or for firing tactical nuclear charges laughing

            It’s interesting that the caliber-m coastal defense complex can also fire at ground targets for 1500km? T This changes a lot ...

            U.S. intelligence probably already all the hair on the ass
            pushed up ...
            1. Tusv
              Tusv 30 October 2015 11: 02
              +4
              Quote: GDP
              So you can see that with the 400-500 it can be used as an Iskander analogue or for firing tactical nuclear charges

              300-400 NATO equate to tactical weapons. And on a four-hundredth roll up a nuclear charge, Iskander will be cooler if he can shoot down targets 12-14 Machs. It’s how fast he’ll scrabble on the ground.
        2. avt
          avt 30 October 2015 09: 25
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Che seriously?

          Added SAM, one seems.
    2. just exp
      just exp 30 October 2015 09: 03
      +4
      the same idea, it seems like Calm is an air defense system, and on ships they have the cheapest Uranus from them.
    3. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen 30 October 2015 09: 31
      +2
      I also don’t understand what the trick is? Calm's 62-pound fragmentation warhead into the ship? Well pokotsat (at the warship of course).
      1. Walking
        Walking 30 October 2015 10: 31
        +2
        Quote: vyinemeynen
        I also don’t understand what the trick is? Calm's 62-pound fragmentation warhead into the ship? Well pokotsat (at the warship of course).


        And the warship in which this missile will be armored?
        I think when hit, everything will beat well with fragments there, and it will be normal on radar antennas.
        1. GDP
          GDP 30 October 2015 10: 51
          +1
          There are different ships, the cruiser 62 kg warhead may not be for anything. But for a missile boat, such a ram crashing at a speed of one and a half thousand meters per second is essential, and it will not seem like a little MRK or MDK ...

          Argentines from exoset with about the same warhead sank the British destroyer, and now the cruisers - armor - no ...

          in addition, you can increase the warhead, or the firing range, very significantly - by reducing the speed to subsonic.
      2. alecsis69
        alecsis69 3 November 2015 06: 52
        0
        I don’t know about “Calm”, but at the military department in the 90s we were taught that “Wasp” can be fired at ships, but it is also anti-aircraft.
    4. Deniska
      Deniska 30 October 2015 12: 46
      0
      managed to successfully hit the full-sized sea target, which simulated a surface ship conditional adversary, from multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system ship-based vertical launch "Calm"



      No comment ...
    5. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 30 October 2015 14: 43
      0
      Ships are different. For some, a dozen calibers are not enough, but for some, even one "Calm" with a head. Quite a reasonable decision, the only drawback is the expenditure of ammunition for air defense missiles. Hence the question about the balance of the weapons project.
    6. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 30 October 2015 15: 44
      +2
      Quote: marlin1203
      And why should "Calm" fire at surface targets?

      Yes, just testing weapons in different modes ...
  2. vkl-47
    vkl-47 30 October 2015 09: 00
    +3
    I saw it on the "star" yesterday. Beauty. Their channel is on YouTube. Go do not be lazy
  3. roskot
    roskot 30 October 2015 09: 02
    +4
    Handsome. It will serve to the glory of Russia, to the envy of enemies.
  4. Eggor
    Eggor 30 October 2015 09: 02
    15


    In the photo in the article, Indian, Grigorovich (photo from the air base):
  5. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 30 October 2015 09: 05
    +5
    caliber then tested .. now they are trying to "calm" ... I understand there a speed of 3-4 M and maybe more ... just a blank will arrive already banging that the Finn and the Swede will sweat with the Norwegian
    1. jjj
      jjj 30 October 2015 10: 12
      +3
      Well, if you jump along the Swedish luminescent "Visby", you can also flash from the stem to the transom
  6. Engineer
    Engineer 30 October 2015 09: 08
    -3
    Quote: marlin1203
    And why should "Calm" fire at surface targets? Caliber-NK is not used for these purposes? And the 3m55 "Onyx" PCR was supposed to be installed on it. Or expensive? soldier

    3m14 on surface targets does not work, this is not an anti-ship missile.
    1. just exp
      just exp 30 October 2015 09: 32
      +1
      in Georgia, it’s like Osoy on a boat, it’s a genule that damn shooting at ships from air defense systems is something.
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 30 October 2015 09: 49
      +1
      But what, 3m54 is not Caliber or what?
    3. Vladimir 1964
      Vladimir 1964 30 October 2015 10: 52
      +7
      Quote: Engineer
      3m14 on surface targets does not work, this is not an anti-ship missile.


      Dear Alexander Vladimirovich, in principle, the rocket can "work" for any target, as long as the target is contrasting in the range in which the guidance system works. Another issue is of course efficiency.

      Something like that, colleague. hi

      PS I’m not a minus, it’s more interesting for me to be smart. yes
  7. Tanker55
    Tanker55 30 October 2015 09: 08
    +2
    Bang-bam and the bull's-eye! We create, experience, get-it’s great when all the services work and they succeed. In one word, our Russia rises and the members don’t like it !!!
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 October 2015 09: 11
    0
    Great, give five to us at the Pacific Fleet, in Vladivostok.)))
    Interestingly, the cheaper it is to hit a naval target with
    other things being equal, Caliber or Calm?
  9. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 October 2015 09: 11
    +4
    In addition, the calculation of the artillery complex A-190 hit the cruise missile target

    It was always interesting - could this cruise missile complex work out, and if so, with what efficiency. Although there is no answer to this in the article - maybe this target missile was an airplane.
    Still nice, of course good
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 30 October 2015 10: 45
      +2
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      maybe this missile target aircraft pretended to be

      Most likely, the journalists beguiled, Calm worked on a cruise missile, and the A-190 on the target ship. wink
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 October 2015 11: 53
        +1
        Quote: Locksmith
        Most likely, the journalists beguiled, Calm worked on a cruise missile, and the A-190 on the target ship

        laughing good
  10. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 30 October 2015 09: 12
    +5
    I do not understand why cross a snake with a hedgehog. Anti-ship missiles - for ships, air defense systems - for air targets, everything is clear and understandable. Or they worked out the option when the Grigorvich, for some reason, could not use the main weapon, specially sharpened for this purpose, against surface targets (or, as an option, due to the use of the NK Caliber).

    "The Shtil-1 anti-aircraft complex uses the 9M317ME guided missile, which is a further development of the ammunition for the Buk land-based air defense missile system. It is a single-stage solid-propellant rocket with a length of 5,18 meters and a body diameter of no more than 360 millimeters. there are rudders with a span of 820 mm With a launch weight of about 580 kg, the 9M317ME anti-aircraft missile carries a 62-kilogram fragmentation warhead.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 30 October 2015 10: 12
      +3
      Quote: Corsair0304
      I don’t understand why to cross a snake with a hedgehog. RCC - for ships, SAM - for air purposes, everything is clear

      Imagine in the Second World War the most effective weapon against tanks, were anti-aircraft guns. And here and there the efficiency indicator is high speed of the flight of ammunition. There are 4 and 4 speeds of sound.
      And if the height of the side is more than 5 meters, then what difference is the target above water or low flying? Two rockets on board and horseradish put out the fire
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 October 2015 11: 34
      +2
      Quote: Corsair0304
      I don’t understand why to cross a snake with a hedgehog

      In principle, you have already been answered, but I will repeat. The subsonic caliber overcomes 250 meters per second. The Shtila missile defense system is about 6 times larger. 25-30 km to the horizon, the Kalibr anti-ship missile system will fly for 100-120 seconds, and the Shtil missile defense system will fly for 17-20 seconds. Combat situation - an enemy missile boat appeared on the horizon. What do you think is better than shooting?
      By the way, be it said, not only we think so. The Americans destroyed an Iranian missile boat by firing 5 Standard missiles at it. They still tried to varnish with the "Harpoon" from above, but the "Harpoon" did not hit - by the time of its approach, the boat had almost sunk, so there was nowhere to hit.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  11. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 30 October 2015 09: 16
    +5
    What pleases is the ability of our naval air defense systems to hit surface targets.
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 30 October 2015 10: 04
      +2
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      What pleases is the ability of our naval air defense systems to hit surface targets.

      It can practically any air defense system within the radio horizon.
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 October 2015 11: 35
        0
        Of those whose missiles can reach the radio horizon :)
    2. Severomor
      Severomor 30 October 2015 11: 02
      +2
      In the 80s, the Shtorm air defense missile system normally hit surface targets as well.
  12. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 30 October 2015 09: 47
    +5
    Quote: vyinemeynen
    I also don’t understand what the trick is? Calm's 62-pound fragmentation warhead into the ship? Well pokotsat (at the warship of course).

    You can’t even imagine what she can do. Read, for example, what happened to MP Monsoon after a practical (without charge) missile hit.
  13. lvn321
    lvn321 30 October 2015 09: 55
    +1
    In the photo is not Grigorovich. Grigorovich number 745
  14. RusDV
    RusDV 30 October 2015 11: 10
    +5
    ship-based multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system with vertical launch. Designed to carry out the defense of the ship against all means of air attack, including to repel massive missile and air attacks; as well as for striking ground and surface targets.
    It is assumed that "Calm-1" will replace the complexes "Hurricane", "Hedgehog" and their export options under the name "Calm", and will also be exported.
    Open information ...... Only max. range of non-export option.
  15. okroshka79
    okroshka79 30 October 2015 13: 26
    +2
    It is possible that the journalists did not confuse anything. Initially, all shipborne air defense systems of our fleet had a mode of firing at surface targets: a special guidance method of the "slide" type was implemented, before launch some commutations were made in the missile itself. Even in the course of combat training, such firing was planned and carried out (he himself fired such firing). About "just paint the paint ..." Don't tell me ... In 1971, the Smyshleniy artillery battalion of the Northern Fleet, due to errors in target designation, fired not at the towed artillery shield of the BKShch 65x13, but the tug itself. I myself have not seen, but from many witnesses I heard the details of such a shelling "in paints". Fortunately, no one was killed in tow - the crew is very small and all the fragments flew past, only one was slightly touched. And the tug was a drushlag in the literal sense of the word. So, if the missile defense ship is defeated, it can be argued with a high probability that all antenna posts of the radar and optics will be crossed "mom, do not worry." In addition, according to the rules, more than one missile is used against surface missiles. So, after such an impact, the enemy will certainly remain blind. As for firing artillery at a target rocket, there is nothing supernatural either. Again, he himself participated in such a shooting at the RM-15M from the AK-100 with a successful result. According to the BP plan, such firing is also being practiced in the fleet. So we can only wish a new ship in our fleet seven feet under the keel and a fair wind. At the same time, I would like to congratulate all the sailors and his admirers on the Day of Education of our Russian Navy.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 30 October 2015 14: 57
    +1
    ... and the Broadsword anti-aircraft missile and artillery system

    "Dad, is it true that the" Broadsword "is on" Grigorovich "? No, sonny, this is fantastic."
  18. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 30 October 2015 15: 02
    +1
    Quote: chunga-changa
    ... and the Broadsword anti-aircraft missile and artillery system

    "Dad, is it true that the" Broadsword "is on" Grigorovich "? No, sonny, this is fantastic."

    This is the AK-630, in previous projects it was controlled by the MP-123, MP-123-01 station, only there were two cannons hung on the station. Although there were ships — and 3 each (Ural).
  19. okroshka79
    okroshka79 30 October 2015 15: 35
    +1
    In MRK "Monsoon" Pacific Fleet 16.04.1986/15/15. hit by the RM-15 target rocket (namely the RM-2, not the RM-3M!), converted from a combat anti-ship missile. Those. instead of the warhead, a weight-size deputy was installed and the homing head was disabled. Thus, when it entered the ship's GKP, it had a very high kinetic energy and, approximately, with XNUMX/XNUMX of the fuel and oxidizer supply for the rocket engine. From there such destruction and such casualties of personnel and staff officers on board. Eternal memory to them!
  20. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 31 October 2015 02: 45
    0
    And yet, the ship’s architecture and radio-technical armament leaves a somewhat unpleasant aftertaste — all this is already out of date, 15 years ago it would have been normal, but not now. Equipment for the BC-5 - in general, a hodgepodge is even from Soviet backlogs.