Press Secretary of the President of the Russian Federation: Approaching NATO’s military infrastructure to the borders of the Russian Federation is undesirable and dangerous in terms of consequences

42
A spokesman for the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, said during a press conference that warnings about the undesirability and danger of increasing NATO’s military presence at Russian borders were heard earlier.



“This is the very approach of NATO and its military infrastructure to our borders. This is not a new phenomenon, these are phenomena about which undesirability and danger, in terms of consequences, we have been talking for a long time, ”the RIA quotes him. "News".

On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing military and diplomatic sources, that the alliance command was considering various options for a possible expansion of its military presence near the borders of the Russian Federation. In particular, it is proposed to place from one to four battalions numbering from 800 to 1000 military personnel in Estonia, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aleksander Rank
    Aleksander
    +8
    30 October 2015 06: 46
    Press Secretary of the President of the Russian Federation: Approaching NATO’s military infrastructure to the borders of the Russian Federation is undesirable and dangerous in terms of consequences


    I already know this for 24 years .... Yes
    1. Zoldat_A Rank
      Zoldat_A
      +11
      30 October 2015 07: 12
      Quote: Aleksander
      I already know this for 24 years ....

      And I have been hoping for 24 years that someday Gorbachev's "faith in the word" America will regurgitate that America. I found someone to believe - they promised him "in words" not to move to our borders and not expand NATO when he sold Eastern Europe to them.

      That's who I would never take a word for, so it’s blatantly Saxons and the Hydrometeorological Center. And then - the Hydrometeorological Center sometimes does not lie ...

      There recently talked about our unpredictability. So I hope that we will unpredictably find, as the GDP said, an adequate response to inappropriate actions. Good phrase, especially in historical terms. Wherever you look - we have one unpredictability - and Berezina was unpredictable, and on May 45. But adequate.
      1. Dembel77 Rank
        Dembel77
        +2
        30 October 2015 07: 32
        Press Secretary of the President of the Russian Federation: Approaching NATO’s military infrastructure to the borders of the Russian Federation is undesirable and dangerous in terms of consequences
        That's what people are like - you have to try everything yourself! But they told them - if you recklessly poke a stick into the den of a sleeping bear, you can achieve only one thing. Will come out and tear!
        1. ZU-23 Rank
          ZU-23
          0
          30 October 2015 07: 43
          In any case, they need a war, we all know this, because where do they send all their troops around the world, they need to be fed for something, and Russia will slowly select these feeders.
          1. MATROSKIN-53 Rank
            MATROSKIN-53
            0
            30 October 2015 10: 36
            No, in principle, there can be no world war. Because there is the most powerful human instinct - this is the instinct of self-preservation. And everyone wants to live! And the third world will be nuclear and short-term. The globe will cease to exist as a habitable planet. And all power-holders understand this. Therefore, no one will destroy themselves, their families, their friends and relatives. Moreover, the available capital - there are no pockets in the coffin ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. dmitrich Rank
      dmitrich
      +1
      30 October 2015 08: 28
      I already know this for 24 years ...
      but what was silent then!
      1. Aleksander Rank
        Aleksander
        0
        30 October 2015 09: 17
        Quote: Dmitry
        I already know this for 24 years ...

        but what was silent then!


        So I didn’t know that Peskov was so ... Estonian ... smile
        1. marlin1203 Rank
          marlin1203
          0
          30 October 2015 10: 01
          Yeah ... a conceptual and most important timely statement ... laughing 1-4 battalions in the Baltic states ... well, if only to calm the nervous Baltic states .. No.
        2. dmitrich Rank
          dmitrich
          0
          31 October 2015 04: 06
          So I didn’t know that Peskov was so ... Estonian ... smile
          so he is a yakut!
    3. My doctor Rank
      My doctor
      -1
      30 October 2015 10: 25
      I’ll raise the topic again. In contrast to NATO troops, the Russian Federation wants to create an air base in the Republic of Belarus, which, if it affects the country's security, is negatively affected by internal stress. Not everyone in the republic likes the base, because this base of another country is friendly but different. There is not a single resident who did not think that the base is needed only to uphold the geopolitical interests of Russia.
      Russia in the current conditions is putting pressure on the republic by threatening to close its markets, the west (first Europe and America yesterday), in turn, suspends the sanctions on enterprises whose products have prospects in Europe.
      So back to the NATO forces, they are in the Baltic states and Poland with the support of the local government and the consent of the frightened population, you are imposing your presence in the Republic, the difference must be understood.
      1. ser-pov Rank
        ser-pov
        +1
        30 October 2015 11: 46
        Yes Easy! Only you buy fighters for your money from us, and not so that give us everything ... And then the base there will not need ours, you yourself can defend yourself ...
      2. ser-pov Rank
        ser-pov
        0
        30 October 2015 11: 46
        Yes Easy! Only you buy fighters for your money from us, and not so that give us everything ... And then the base there will not need ours, you yourself can defend yourself ...
      3. Zoldat_A Rank
        Zoldat_A
        +2
        30 October 2015 13: 49
        Quote: MyVrach
        Russia in the present conditions presses the republic with the threat of closing its markets

        Precisely noticed - crushing threat of closure for Belarus salmon and mussel markets.
  2. avvg Rank
    avvg
    0
    30 October 2015 06: 46
    "The consequences for the NATO bloc will be very deplorable, they are like children playing with fire," Peskov warned about.
  3. iliitchitch Rank
    iliitchitch
    0
    30 October 2015 06: 53
    So they will stick their sting until they pinch. Maybe it's enough to already show "deep concern"?
  4. Alex66 Rank
    Alex66
    +8
    30 October 2015 06: 53
    We are accustomed to the NATO approach, but it’s difficult to get used to the fact that the government spits on us, appointing Serdyukov to a new position.
    1. demo Rank
      demo
      +3
      30 October 2015 07: 09
      The people did not protest about the withdrawal of this fruit from responsibility.
      people did not protest against the release of this defendant in parole.
      The people will endure the appointment of this shameless Hari to the post of curator.
      Fu
      How disgusting.
      And who is the one who pushed him there?
      Who knows the name of this powerful official who does not pay attention to either the law or the opinion of the people?
      Who knows?
      Please inform!
      1. dog1965 Rank
        dog1965
        0
        30 October 2015 10: 27
        Something this is not quite on the topic.
  5. Reptiloid Rank
    Reptiloid
    0
    30 October 2015 07: 00
    For how many years NATO has been closer, closer. What can be deplorable to them? I should rather see how they pay.
  6. sergeyzzz Rank
    sergeyzzz
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 00
    Quote: Alex66
    appointing Serdyukov to a new position is difficult to get used to.

    The intrigue continues. Waiting for .....
    1. Zoldat_A Rank
      Zoldat_A
      +2
      30 October 2015 07: 29
      Quote: sergeyzzz
      The intrigue continues. Waiting for ....

      What can I expect - stole, drank, amnesty. Stole, drank, amnesty. Why not live like that ... I'm just thinking - if it was initially clear that everything was clear - why didn't they quietly "transfer to another job"? Or as the head of Russian Railways - did they not send your memoirs to write? Why was the people excited? Or is the GDP rating testing its strength?

      We are waiting for the lards stolen from ROSTEKH. Moreover, some kind of direction - "aviation cluster" ... What do we have, planes in Syria fly too well? Need to put Taburetkina?

      I am sure he would have come to an agreement with NATO. I would shake money from America for the deployment of an American division in the territory that Kantemirovskaya now occupies. And I would tell us something about "optimization" ... Pa..dla ..

      With such as Taburetkin, American troops are not in the Baltic states - they will appear in the Moscow Region ... am
  7. Wolka Rank
    Wolka
    0
    30 October 2015 07: 02
    the deployed battalion in the Baltic countries is not very strong, but in case of aggravation of the situation, distracting attention, crap and interfere will definitely be like an etched mongrel ...
  8. Tanker55 Rank
    Tanker55
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 03
    We’ll install, deliver, arrange, get out more steamed radish. Hegemony and Nato are two cancers on Mother Earth.
  9. Ararat Rank
    Ararat
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 07
    Put near the border of the Baltic states a prostitute to Iskander with Ya.B. and so that they are on the gun.
  10. kostyan77708 Rank
    kostyan77708
    0
    30 October 2015 07: 18
    Quote: ararat
    Put near the border of the Baltic states a prostitute to Iskander with Ya.B. and so that they are on the gun.

    I think they are already under the gun
  11. taseka Rank
    taseka
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 19
    It's not about 4 battalions! The point is in the 1 category aerodromes and base logistics, where the material and technical base of the first strike on the 8-12 brigades of the first echelon of NATO forces built at the place of deployment of these PARTS AND ALLOWED IN THEIR INTERESTS OF LIFE SUPPORT - PSM, , FIELD CAMP EQUIPMENT AND MTB. But on the other hand, these points will immediately be laid down in the destruction table 1 of the defense stage - let the country scratch their turnips at which a preemptive strike will be struck !!!
  12. Zomanus Rank
    Zomanus
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 20
    Yeah. It is significant to present the regiment or brigade of the Iskander, where on each missile in large letters the country or settlement in the Baltic states will be written, where exactly this missile will fly.
    Then it’s real that the fart at the Balts will explode when they show a soldier on the air who lovingly wipes a rocket with the name of the settlement in which you currently live.))
    1. Zoldat_A Rank
      Zoldat_A
      +1
      30 October 2015 08: 36
      Quote: Zomanus
      Yeah. It is significant to present the regiment or brigade of the Iskander, where on each missile in large letters the country or settlement in the Baltic states will be written, where exactly this missile will fly.
      Then it’s real that the fart at the Balts will explode when they show a soldier on the air who lovingly wipes a rocket with the name of the settlement in which you currently live.))

      Photos to send to each Balts, like the way they send letters of happiness to the Pension Fund. And at the same time in Europe. I think that postage in this case is one of the most useful investments of money, for example, for Gazprom. Well, as a sponsor, for example ... laughing
  13. vlad.svargin Rank
    vlad.svargin
    +1
    30 October 2015 07: 22
    Beginning with Alexander Nevsky, united Europe every century comes to the same rake, dreaming of conquering Russia and after a good beatings calms down for a while, but not for long. So in every age, applying different methods. They do not want to be friends with history, this time they lay down under the next hegemon from overseas. Something is in the genes of the powerful Europeans from a hyena-like predator who perceive the desire for peace as a weakness and so every time. They only understand strength. More often Anglo-Saxons (descendants of reptiles with "blue blood") dominate there - they stir up trouble in Europe. Actually, in the USA, basically, the Anglo-Saxons are at the helm with a pathological hatred of Russians and therefore they are pushing their "sixes" to unreasonable actions. If we turn to history, then in most of the wars with Russia there was England (the same Anglo-Saxons who consider themselves an exclusive race). And this time, unfortunately, we will again have to "calm down the unreasonable"
    1. Zoldat_A Rank
      Zoldat_A
      +1
      30 October 2015 08: 40
      Quote: vlad.svargin
      Starting from Alexander Nevsky, the united Europe has been stepping on the same rake every century, dreaming of conquering Russia, and after a good raking, calms down for a while, but not for long. So in every century, applying various methods.

      I'm always curious - why every new "civilizers" of Russia think that yes, those, those, those and those over there got snot in Russia, and "here I will certainly get lucky!" And it ends again with Berezina and the Reichstag ...
  14. Hyperboreas Rank
    Hyperboreas
    +2
    30 October 2015 07: 26
    We must return to Cuba and build bases with missiles in South America. Yes, even somewhere from Kamchatka to shy away from a ballistic missile with a normal charge against ISIS targets in Syria, so that mattresses and others like them are completely crap !!!!
    1. twincam Rank
      twincam
      0
      30 October 2015 08: 40
      it's yes)))
      I present the news in the newspaper: "a Russian missile fired from a submarine from the Caribbean Sea has successfully hit an ISIL base in Syria"
    2. Zoldat_A Rank
      Zoldat_A
      +1
      30 October 2015 08: 55
      Quote: Hyperborea
      Yes, even somewhere from Kamchatka to shy away from a ballistic missile with an ordinary charge against ISIS targets in Syria, so that mattresses and others like them are completely crap !!!!

      A ton of TNT from Kamchatka to Syria - that's cool! Then, exactly in Washington, "ambulances" will not be enough to transport the White House to Maddom - it will be easier to change the signboard ...

      Does anyone here understand about missiles? On "Poplar", for example, can you put a normal, non-nuclear head off?

      Not too lazy, looked - from Kamchatka to Syria 8500 km - as to Washington, by the way laughing , the throw weight of the Topol-M is 1200 kg. Distances are behind the eyes, KVO is also suitable, you won't miss ISIS. Throwing a ton of TNT at 8500 km would look solid. It seems to me...
  15. tommy717 Rank
    tommy717
    0
    30 October 2015 07: 32
    When already at p-dos, the economy will be bent so that the maintenance of a heap of military bases for them is not a lifting load?
    1. AlexTires Rank
      AlexTires
      +1
      30 October 2015 10: 02
      Until the printing press bends ....
  16. provincial Rank
    provincial
    0
    30 October 2015 07: 39
    yesterday I watched V. Solovyov's show "Duel" on VGTRK. V. Zhirinovsky M O L O D E Ts.
    1. Alexander Romanov Rank
      Alexander Romanov
      0
      30 October 2015 08: 12
      Quote: provincial
      show of V. Solovyov

      Actually, the show is completely different, although for you there may be all to one. What Malakhov, what Soloviev laughing
      1. provincial Rank
        provincial
        0
        30 October 2015 08: 32
        Yes, we Tatars do not care that .... that threshing, if only the forehead was wet. I love smart people, especially those who believe that their word is the last resort. It is no coincidence that they did not serve in the SA, they did not go to the generals.
  17. Old26 Rank
    Old26
    -3
    30 October 2015 08: 35
    Quote: Hyperborea
    We must return to Cuba and build bases with missiles in South America.

    Yeah. But the result will not be in our favor. What can we place in Cuba? Iskanders with a range of 500 km? We will cover the south of Florida with all the resorts. And they are in Estonia - rockets that take 3 minutes to fly to Moscow-Leningrad. Plus awesome. We are targeting them with resorts - they are our capitals ... The exchange is awesome.
    How many times have they written about this nonsense about placing missiles again in Cuba - no, every time a new fan of this appears ...
  18. vovan50 Rank
    vovan50
    0
    30 October 2015 09: 11
    Oh, they wait in the Baltic States to force the withdrawal from NATO.
  19. mikh-korsakov Rank
    mikh-korsakov
    0
    30 October 2015 10: 14
    The language of diplomats is interesting. I quote "undesirable in terms of consequences." Generally. if you look at the i. diocy of this phrase is obvious. If "from the point of view it is undesirable for us," then we all know this, we only want it for them. If it is "undesirable from the point of view of consequences" for the adversary, then the adversary must be explained why this is undesirable for them, otherwise they do not know if they are posting.
  20. Velizariy Rank
    Velizariy
    0
    30 October 2015 10: 32
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Hyperborea
    We must return to Cuba and build bases with missiles in South America.

    Yeah. But the result will not be in our favor. What can we place in Cuba? Iskanders with a range of 500 km? We will cover the south of Florida with all the resorts. And they are in Estonia - rockets that take 3 minutes to fly to Moscow-Leningrad. Plus awesome. We are targeting them with resorts - they are our capitals ... The exchange is awesome.
    How many times have they written about this nonsense about placing missiles again in Cuba - no, every time a new fan of this appears ...

    The same Caliber will get the same notorious Washington ... But this is only the rocket that we know about.