Is the attack of ISIS militants preventable?

Today, electronic media are full of pictures of victories over ISIS in Syria. Only the lazy one does not write about the prospects of Bashar Assad in this war. On the actions of Russia. About the reaction of the West and the United States. And somehow vaguely passed the message on the meeting of the heads of the special services of the CIS countries in Moscow on October 28. Meanwhile, this meeting should be given more attention.




The specifics of the work of these services is largely closed to a simple man in the street. Just from time to time, there are messages about the prevention of terrorist acts, the destruction of the militants. Or vice versa. But security tasks cannot be solved without coordinating their actions with neighboring countries.

Against the background of the active phase of the offensive in Syria, more and more messages appear from various sources about the withdrawal of the most active and trained militants from the territory of this state. For the time being, southern Turkey and northern Africa have appeared. But everyone understands that the ten units (approximately 4000 people), which are based on immigrants from the CIS countries, are ultimately preparing to enter these countries. The prepared and ideological fighters are a great danger.

And if these militants can be ultimately calculated, then those whom they will actively recruit are more difficult. Remember the last arrest of the alleged victims of propaganda - Varvara Karaulova. As it turned out, this "victim" is an active recruiter, and it will take a long time to calculate her victims. These people are a fertile environment for the preparation of suicide bombers.

What should be created ideally? First, it is necessary to strengthen the borders of the CIS. It is the CIS, and not individual member countries of the Commonwealth. This is the only way to control entry and exit to the CIS.

The first talk about this began back in 1991 year. Almost since the inception of the Commonwealth. However, some leaders of countries, in particular, Ukraine and Tajikistan, actively opposed this. What's the matter? What is this reluctance based on?

First of all, on the personal ambitions of managers. After the collapse of the USSR, especially in Central Asia, there was a unique situation when it was possible to take one of the leading places in the region. The place of the USSR became vacant. Now there is a struggle between Karimov, Rakhmon and Nazarbayev. Not very noticeable, but tough enough.

The creation of a common border force will automatically nullify this struggle. It is clear that the resources of Russia, its military and economic potential, will make it Russia, the Russian border troops, the basis of the new border service. This means that all three leaders will have to forget about the ambitions of the leaders of the fate of the region.

However, it is necessary to remind about other members of the CIS. For which at the moment the problem of returning militants is not so acute. In particular, Armenia and Belarus. Would they risk their soldiers and officers? So far this topic has not been raised at the official level. But the question is quite scrupulous. Most likely, sadly, the leaders of these countries will also oppose the joint border.

Another aspect of the activities of special services in this direction is the cooperation of intelligence services. Often, terrorists are in other CIS countries, but are preparing sabotage, for example, in Russia. It seems to be no problems in this should be. But alas, they are. And quite serious.

The fact is that such information is particularly secret. And this secrecy is due to the presence of hidden sources. It is these sources that are the stop for cooperation. Calculate the information received place of receipt for professionals is not particularly difficult. So, there is a threat of losing the agent.

But the main thing, in my opinion, is the lack of a common concept of combating terrorists. Each country has its own opinion on this issue. This aspect intersects with the above. For example, Russia and Uzbekistan are working hard to curb the spread of the ideas of terrorists. But Uzbeks refuse to cooperate. This is motivated by the fact that work inside the country is the business of the special services of this particular country. There is some logic in this. In Uzbekistan, the appearance of Russian will be noticeable. And in Russia, the emergence of another Uzbek?

During the period of color revolution in Kyrgyzstan, many militants disappeared in Russia. And the special services of this country were forced to work with us in their own, rather closed, diasporas.

The economic condition of the country greatly influences the attitude towards terrorists. Where the economy is weak, they work hard. I have already mentioned Uzbekistan. Similarly, we can talk about Tajikistan. It is there that gangsters are tough. Any manifestation of terrorism is actively suppressed. But in rather rich Kazakhstan there is no such rigidity. Intelligence agencies take a fairly liberal position.

No wonder that Russian President Vladimir Putin found it necessary to personally speak at the Council of the Heads of Special Services of the CIS countries. According to him, “today nobody can fight effectively against organized crime, terrorism alone,” and “the threats around our countries are not becoming less, and perhaps these problems are aggravated.”

What conclusions can be drawn from what leaked to the media?

1. There is an urgent need to stop the unwanted struggle for leadership in the Central Asian region. Political ambitions have already led to active confrontation between the border guards of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. These contradictions can easily take advantage of terrorists.

2. It is necessary to interact more closely within the framework of the CSTO and the SCO. Terrorists are already infiltrating our territory. I am now not only about Russia. This applies to all countries, members of the CIS.

3. Weak economical states need help. And above all to us, the Russians. Yes, it is expensive. But it is necessary, including for our security.

4. It is necessary to find such forms of informing each other, in which the solution of other tasks of the special services will not suffer. Without trust, there is no cooperation.

5. It is necessary to intensify the work of the special services along the line of anti-terror and counter-terrorism. Any form of assistance in these matters should be provided at the CIS level.

6. It is necessary to maintain the stability of the countries of the Central Asian region. Today, as the events of recent months show, the authorities of these countries are fully capable of preventing serious upheavals within countries.

7. The common border has already become a necessity. And it is time to transfer the talk about its creation into a real working plane.

Terrorism in Syria is retreating. But he is not defeated. He just goes to the usual field of activity. Active underground, sabotage, undermining the foundations of the state, fear of citizens.

Personally, I no longer want to see destroyed homes and blown-up buses. I do not want to see the tears of children and mothers. The earth must burn under the feet of these nonhumans. And this is a big deal for our special services. As one of the Soviet leaders said there, the goals are defined, the tasks are set. For the work, comrades! Better not tell.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. strelets 30 October 2015 06: 38 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    This is not the time to find out who is in charge in the sandbox. Against terrorists it is necessary to act as a united front. Disunity is deadly.
    1. Babr 30 October 2015 07: 57 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: strelets
      This is not the time to find out who is in charge in the sandbox. Against terrorists it is necessary to act as a united front. Disunity is deadly.

      United front? What is it like? And with whom?

      As Gordon Daf, a veteran of the US military operations, who was captured in Iraq by an Israeli general who is most likely being interrogated by representatives of the Iranian special services, has already recognized the long-standing ties between the Mossad and ISIS, New East Outlook reports.
      A report on the capture of an Israeli general by the Shiite militia by the Israeli general, reaffirming the fact that the Zionist regime coordinated the activities of thugs carrying terror and death to peoples who had the misfortune of being Israel’s neighbors, appeared a few days ago.

      However, this did not become a sensation. Reports of funding and coordination by the Zionist regime of terrorist attacks on Syria began to appear even in Lifenews reports.

      At first glance, it is rather strange that Israel is providing assistance to jihadists, who proclaim their goal to destroy, including Israel itself. But there are explanations for this behavior.
  2. smith7 30 October 2015 06: 42 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Actually. I agree with the author. “Personally, I no longer want to see the destroyed houses and blown up buses. I don’t want to see the tears of children and mothers. The earth should burn under the feet of these nonhumans. And this is, to a great extent, our special services. As one of the Soviet leaders said there - Goals are defined , tasks set. Comrades for work! You can’t say better. " And I do not want to! But p. "3. Economically weak states need to be helped. And above all, we Russians. Yes, this is costly. But it is necessary, including for our security." greed and not the desire "to tear one's own from us" will not allow us to take it for granted. On this, by the way, liberal compradors will actively engage. Indeed, the costs of supporting weak regimes in the CIS are not directly justified by the security of Russia, and therefore are not understood by the electorate. Most people do not want or cannot see beyond their own noses.
    1. Slobber 30 October 2015 09: 25 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Weak economies need help.

      The CIS was previously a stillborn structure. I’ll also remind you how much Russia has forgiven debts and how much it paid. There is no help, only to bomb and poison.
  3. aszzz888 30 October 2015 07: 12 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Contagion to win only together.
    And the methods are not so important, it's about the physical elimination of the IGilovites.
    The time to mumble has passed. We must act quickly and toughly so that others are not in the habit.
  4. Kindof 30 October 2015 08: 00 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    8. To solve the problem of labor migrants, who increase the level of domestic crime, not to mention the conductivity of radical ideas.
  5. Tatar 174 30 October 2015 08: 04 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If the leaders of Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan or Turkmenistan do not want to fight together with others (us) to fight the penetration of terrorists into their countries, and then to us how to force them ??? Do they rely on "maybe" until a certain bird pecks in one place in the middle of the cerebral hemispheres)? I see no other explanation.
  6. Air Force captain 30 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    We have in Central Asia .. unfortunately the regimes of the specific princes who imagined themselves to be new Juche or mini-emperors. To support them financially and indirectly finance their narrow-minded interests (I fully admit that part of the cash flows can be redirected by them to support destabilization (by the same ISIS). Therefore (forgive me for the excellent opinion), I do not believe in the return of financing at our expense for these regimes in the context of the fight against terrorism. We must act as "exceptional", I learned - I bombed in someone else's territory. They will swallow. There will be a result. And believe me - we will be addressed to them with open arms and we will get a knife in the back. We will make a tough decision they will respect their interests, I repeat - this is my personal opinion (it may not be right), but from my own experience I know who they are (Tajiks, Uzbeks, Turkmens ... and even Kyrgyzstan) I do not believe them. respect to all those present hi
    1. sa-ag 30 October 2015 11: 10 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Quote: Captain Air Force
      It is necessary to act as "exceptional", I learned - I bombed in someone else's territory. They will swallow.

      Everything is as simple as in a computer game ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. dv_generalov 30 October 2015 16: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There is logic in your words!
    3. Ria
      Ria 31 October 2015 01: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I agree. 10 years of life in Uzbekistan have opened their eyes to a lot. Among Asians, such a mentality is respected only by those who firmly hold them by the throat and force them to work out every penny issued in full. The current policy of the former "our" republics clearly confirms this. They consider Russians fools for giving them money, resources, specialists, protection, work and earnings, etc., the contemptuous name for us there is “white-eared”. No matter how much you give, there will be no gratitude and respect, let alone solidarity in the fight against terrorism. Only behind their backs they will harm and betray, playing on two sides. Realistically understanding this situation, you can properly build your own policy: TAKE CONTROL OF THE NEEDED SECTIONS OF THE CIS BORDERS AND DO NOT GIVE LOCAL TO LAUNCH UNDER THE THREAT LEAVE THEM ONE ONE WITH ISIS.
  7. knn54 30 October 2015 11: 04 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    1. To act as Israel, to destroy the top wherever they are.
    2. Hang, not plant.
    And the MAIN THING - while there will be cash flows there will be no sense.
  8. shershen 30 October 2015 14: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the photo, one directs a machine gun at his comrade, and a bayonet attached to the AK should probably cause wild horror in the enemy. Pontorezs are cheap.
    1. Bashibuzuk 30 October 2015 15: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The one who sits also sent a trunk to a colleague in the liver.
      This one, with a knife - .. an odd fool, Ramba-ramba ...
      Eh .. they would light the ballroom.
      And take a picture after.
      1. sssla 30 October 2015 21: 23 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Bashibuzuk
        ..light pressure

        But what kind of apparatus is this ??
  9. Megatron 30 October 2015 16: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Honestly, already tired of these integration processes in the CIS, on the topic - peace, friendship, chewing gum. Instead of fencing off an impenetrable wall from them, introducing strict visa restrictions and not letting all this trash come to us, we again open our arms to them, make it easier for them to stay in our country, and find jobs.

    Or everyone has already forgotten how recently Russians were thrown out from there, robbed, seized property, or even simply cut. Are we gingerbread again for them ??
  10. Reptiloid 31 October 2015 01: 56 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    A thin world is better than a good quarrel, a good world is better than a bad one. The desire of amers is to create more foci near our border. We must resist this.
  11. Dimon19661 31 October 2015 06: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Megatron
    Honestly, already tired of these integration processes in the CIS, on the topic - peace, friendship, chewing gum. Instead of fencing off an impenetrable wall from them, introducing strict visa restrictions and not letting all this trash come to us, we again open our arms to them, make it easier for them to stay in our country, and find jobs.

    Or everyone has already forgotten how recently Russians were thrown out from there, robbed, seized property, or even simply cut. Are we gingerbread again for them ??

    +
  12. bad
    bad 3 November 2015 14: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: knn54
    1. To act as Israel, to destroy the top wherever they are.
    2. Hang, not plant.
    And the MAIN THING - while there will be cash flows there will be no sense.
    I will support .. +