Pentagon: Reducing the number of sorties of US aircraft in Syria is in no way connected with the Russians

32
Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren said during a briefing on Wednesday that a decrease in the number of American sorties aviation in Syria is not connected with the actions of the Russian Federation.



“It has nothing to do with the Russians. Perhaps there will be some changes, but the influence is minimal at best, ”RIA "News".

Warren also noted that the main reason for reducing the number of air strikes is the employment of resources in the fighting in Iraq, in particular in the Ramadi region.

“The only reason that there was a small amount of air strikes in Syria over the past few days is in Ramadi,” he said.

From the reports of the US Armed Forces, it follows that from September and from August the number of airstrikes of the international coalition led by the United States — up to about 1-2 two in Syria daily.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +20
    29 October 2015 12: 34
    In Russian, this is called "humpbacked excuses."
    Americans are afraid to screw up. They cannot bomb their own, drop bombs into the desert, the whole world will laugh.
    1. +13
      29 October 2015 12: 37
      Yes, we believe you, we believe .. (urgent maintenance was needed, etc.) We in Russia understand the people.))))
      1. jjj
        +4
        29 October 2015 12: 43
        Well, these started talking that they would not interfere, and gradually reduced their presence in the region. The missiles of the Caspian flotilla really showed that the American AUG is no longer a one-sided force. It’s like in 1949 when the USSR tested its atomic bomb
      2. +5
        29 October 2015 12: 50
        already disgraced all over the world with Afghanistan and Iraq ... just one thought, the Yankees go home)))
    2. +3
      29 October 2015 12: 44
      Well, yes, indeed, they themselves changed their minds)))))))))))))
      1. +3
        29 October 2015 13: 19
        Not connected, not connected at all laughing
    3. 0
      29 October 2015 13: 49
      I have the same opinion ...
    4. Ruskiy
      0
      29 October 2015 14: 31
      By the way, it would not hurt to see what they still bomb and analyze to the public.
    5. +1
      29 October 2015 21: 29
      Quote: PlotnikoffDD
      Americans are afraid to screw up. They can’t bomb their own, drop bombs in the desert, the whole world will laugh

      Maybe they have already delivered anti-aircraft weapons and now they don’t know in whose hands they fell laughing
  3. +7
    29 October 2015 12: 34
    Just against the background of the work of our pilots, the results of the Americans are so insignificant that they actually better hide in the bushes, so as not to disgrace.
    1. +4
      29 October 2015 12: 45
      Quote: AlexTires
      amid the work of our pilots, the results of the Americans are so insignificant that they actually better hide in the bushes

      Hmm ... but our pilots are struggling with the results of the work of the Americans. Maybe I didn’t understand something, but our flyers are destroying just the caravans of American weapons.
  4. +3
    29 October 2015 12: 36
    In the sky it became crowded ... Scat near our fly, or what? Or grenades, pah, terrorists of the wrong system, pah, friendly USA remained ...
  5. +4
    29 October 2015 12: 36
    laughing Yes Yes
    1. +2
      29 October 2015 12: 44
      “The only reason that there have been a small number of airstrikes in Syria over the past few days is in El-Rus,” he said. feel
  6. +8
    29 October 2015 12: 37
    Warren also noted that the main reason for reducing the number of air strikes is the employment of resources in the fighting in Iraq, in particular in the Ramadi region.
    We know what you bomb in Syria
  7. Tor5
    +8
    29 October 2015 12: 38
    Is kerosene over? Here is a disgrace, especially against the background of the number of our flights.
    1. +5
      29 October 2015 14: 00
      no, the rest of conscience and decency has ended.
  8. yan 2015
    +4
    29 October 2015 12: 40
    Well yes .. no way connected with the Russians. we’re just not cowards, we’re just peacekeepers .. we love to fight where there will be no return .. said Colonel Steve Warren and bashfully lowered his eyes.
  9. +1
    29 October 2015 12: 42
    It's just that earlier the bombing was carried out mainly with "humanitarian supplies" for mass suppression - supplying ISIS ... And now every day there are few of them due to decreasing, draping or natural killing.
  10. +5
    29 October 2015 12: 43
    Freshly legend so hard to believe ...
  11. +2
    29 October 2015 12: 44
    Our aircraft technicians work in three shifts, and they have one.
    Here are the planes and idle.
    1. +2
      29 October 2015 13: 13
      There the unions strictly follow this! lol
  12. +1
    29 October 2015 12: 46
    They didn’t allow us to create a no-fly zone, so it makes no sense to fly.
    1. +3
      29 October 2015 12: 50
      I would prefer the answer that "after the Russians, few goals remain"
    2. +1
      29 October 2015 12: 51
      just created, they themselves do not fly smile
  13. +1
    29 October 2015 12: 46
    There America stuttered about the poor logistics of the HSC of the Russian Federation with a decrease in the outflow of our aircraft what but as I understand it, everything is normal with logistics lol because they fly a little
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +2
    29 October 2015 12: 50
    The Americans used to pretend that they were striking ISIS and at the same time dropped weapons and b / ns to the same bandits. Now that Russia has taken ISIS seriously, the Americans only have to "cast a shadow over the fence" in the Western media and switch to Iraq in order to show at least something.
    1. +1
      29 October 2015 12: 53
      Quite rightly said.
  16. +2
    29 October 2015 13: 07
    Government troops can’t be bombed, but the United States has no more enemies in Syria!
  17. +1
    29 October 2015 13: 09
    do not get used to fighting terrorism with the wrong hands.
  18. +2
    29 October 2015 13: 36
    By itself! Russians have nothing to do with it, Americans themselves are dumb to fly next to Russians. laughing
  19. +1
    29 October 2015 13: 47
    Well, it’s probably like that, things are going on ...! hi
  20. 0
    29 October 2015 14: 14
    Do you think it's nice to fly when the on-board computer constantly yells that "you are on the gun" ... And even with a high degree of risk of disconnecting all electronics ... ???
  21. 0
    29 October 2015 14: 49
    IG captured the university near the city of Al Ramadi in Iraq.
    American pilots graze there now.
  22. 0
    29 October 2015 15: 30
    This is exactly what we understood. wink Sami happened so in childhood otmazyvatsya laughing
  23. 0
    29 October 2015 16: 03
    that from September and August the number of airstrikes by the international coalition led by the United States is up to about 1-2 in the territory of Syria daily
    not written in Russian! fuck you! it is clear just that the United States leads the world ... and what does it mean "to 1" - zero? or even a minus? minus is possible, provided that the Yankees are for the wrong team
  24. 0
    29 October 2015 16: 04
    Excavators and combines have ended in Syria ...
  25. +4
    29 October 2015 17: 42
    But could it be that these exceptional, so to speak, people ... still threw MANPADS to the camel drivers. And away from sin, they began to fly in another place, citing circumstances.
    Do not strain us maximum attention. Oh, this is very suspicious.
    In the end, they were not offended by the refusal of our pilots to speak English.
  26. 0
    29 October 2015 18: 21
    A Pentagon spokesman, Colonel Steve Warren, said during a briefing on Wednesday that the decline in the number of US sorties in Syria is not related to the actions of the Russian Federation.

    Baby talk. Even no argument can lead

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"