Military Review

US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime

78
The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.




"The fundamental choice is whether Russia intends to support (Syrian President Bashar) Al-Assad or help solve problems (in the region)," the RIA quotes him. "News".

Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."

According to the Secretary of State, it is quite possible that "the result of this strategy will be the radicalization of the situation," and this will be discussed in the course of the "discussions that we will have in Vienna."

The aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces began to deliver pinpoint strikes against militant positions in Syria from September 30 following a request from Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. SS68SS
    SS68SS 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    19
    "Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime"


    Такое ощущение что Керри вообще не пользуется ни данными объективного контроля, ни данными разведки. Причем ни своей ни нашей. (Предлагали же обмен информацией - отказались) У м.ерикосов, как и у у.кропов, соц.сети выполняют роль информаторов. По русски это называется "сорока на хвосте принесла". Собирают сплетни со всей сети, а потом с таким деловым видом придают официальность всей интернетной чепухе... Позор вам, янки и янкоподкладки. Кроме чувства брезгливости у меня эти ч.мошники ничего не вызывают... Тфу...
    1. Vend
      Vend 29 October 2015 10: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: SS68SS
      “Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime,”

      So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? They refused, now they stink laughing
      1. Temples
        Temples 29 October 2015 11: 01 New
        18
        The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.

        How's that?
        Is he from Budun or something?
        When was the VKS controlled by the State Department?
        Gathered to control the actions of Russia!
        Is he stoned or something?
        Confused with monitoring?
        1. Now we are free
          Now we are free 29 October 2015 11: 15 New
          12
          Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."
          USA in the face of the restless Kerry, which is already called for ... smiling (talking)
          V.V.P. To the whole world he openly asked the USA:
          -Tell us the position of the caliphate in Syria?
          And in response to silence ...
          -WELL, THEN TELL US WHERE THE POSITION OF MODERATE OPPOSITION?
          And in response to silence ...

          Question -How do you understand if you are not saying anything? .. (GDP)

          PS
          Глянь ка теперь ещё и обижаются, что бомбим мол не тех... США словно преобразилась -Ещё минуту назад была "Мамочкой" раздававшей всему миру п..., а теперь строит из себя "Целочку" молчащую и потупившую свой взор в пол а в глазах у "Недотроги" слёзы от того, что её воспитанное и культурное молчание не поняли, не оценили и не простили... (хотя последнее из немного другого комедийного сериала laughing ).
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
            +6
            Мой ответ Джиму: Большинство российских бомбардировок направлены против «Исламского государства» (ИГ), а другие "оппоненты" режима Асада - идут прицепом, в довесок, так сказать!
            Лес рубят, щепки летят! (Русская поговорка) Тем более эти "щепки" тоже террористы!
            Moderate, fired, stoned or stubborn - what's the difference ?!
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 29 October 2015 11: 36 New
              +2
              No wonder

              Do not care for them Assad, Isil and everyone else

              Что бы мы не делали - они найдут в этом негатив для обработки своих "союзников"

              Все что им надо - найти повод для новых нападок на Россию, а там санкции, шумиха в прессе, "русские - это зло хуже игила" и т.д.

              Pressure on Europe, new weapons, transatlantic partnership

              The game continues

              Мы можем хоть мир от марсиан спасти, или астероид на пути к Земле уничтожить все равно это будет "недемократично" и угрозой человечеству будет именно Россия


              Надо искать "игил" на американском континенте и правильно направлять его, и ускорить таяние льдов в Нашей Арктике, чтобы их побыстрее смыло.

              Yesterday on the show, the American said bluntly:
              - The Pentagon is in no hurry to help Russia, it is waiting to get more Russian
              blood was spilled


              I won’t be surprised that the American agent took the girl from the contractor who committed suicide ...

              1. jjj
                jjj 29 October 2015 12: 19 New
                +1
                Yesterday I watched a video: a speech and answers to Sergey Glazyev’s questions from October 23. He expressed a very interesting thought. Now two things are happening to the world: a global change in technology and a change in world order.
                By technology, the locomotives of progress are: medicine (bioengineering, pharmacology, genetics, etc.), culture and art (including leisure and hobbies), education and science. Most of the global investment will go there.
                In the management of the world, the struggle of imperial and integrated systems began. The old imperial system led by America was the result of two world and cold wars. Russia is included in this system as the outlying periphery along with Central Asia. Purely as a raw materials appendage and a colony in the traditional sense.
                At the same time, an integrated system led by China began to take shape. China took advantage of the achievements of the USSR and managed to combine the planning system and the market. That is what gives such a powerful development. But in China, the state stands above the market and regulates it. In Japan and Korea, too, the market and the state were combined. But there the market is a priority. For Russia, the way is to find a balance between the ways of China and Japan. The integrated model includes the BRICS countries. The main principle of the integrated system is respect for the sovereignty of countries. Unlike the imperial system, where only one country has sovereignty, all others are required to fulfill the will of the center.
                So the integrated and imperial systems began the struggle. Based on historical experience, a world war should begin. But now it may not be thermonuclear, with tank breakthroughs and the seizure of territories. It is conducted by economic methods and in the information field using individual regional conflicts, but which occur constantly nearby or within the spheres of interests of the countries against which the war is being waged.
                In fact, from what Glazyev said, it can be concluded that a world war is already underway.
                Любопытно еще вот что. Отвечая на вопрос о нашумевшем "Докладе Глазьева" Сергей Юрьевич заметил, что доклад будет обнародован только 29 октября в Академии Наук. Это сегодня. Потом он будет размещен для всеобщего ознакомления в Интернете
              2. _Vladislav_
                _Vladislav_ 29 October 2015 13: 26 New
                0
                Kerry emphasized that “most of the Russian bombing is not directed against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime”

                The fundamental factor and rationale for the actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces is the request of official Damascus.
                And already whom the VKS are being bombed by ISIS or Uncle Mahmoud’s shed, it is insignificant - if this fully satisfies official Damascus. This is the key point.

                А когда России предъявляют претензии: "вы бомбите не туда", в ответ слышится что то типа оправдания:"Да нет нет, вы что, мы всё правильно бомбим". При этом претензии России предъявляют те кто находиться там вообще не имеет права.

                PS
                Дипломатия тонкая вещь, но на мой взгляд, есть необходимость по чаще напоминать нашим "дорогим" партнерам об этом.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 29 October 2015 11: 02 New
        +3
        let your mouth go with soap and water, yes ... the main staff of the terrorists is in the white house ...
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 29 October 2015 11: 07 New
          18
          Quote: sasha 19871987
          .. the main headquarters of the terrorists is sitting in a white house ...

          Is this scarecrow Kerry about to control Russia? Controlling has not grown yet an unwise person ... US the sky itself warns.
          1. taseka
            taseka 29 October 2015 12: 09 New
            0
            I agree!!!! drinks
      3. Kostyar
        Kostyar 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
        +4
        US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime

        But the American bombing is directed exclusively against IS fighters, and not against hospitals and weddings .......
      4. Bort radist
        Bort radist 29 October 2015 11: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? Sami refused

        So they have their own here and there. Weapons to both sides throw up - controlled chaos.
      5. amber-50
        amber-50 29 October 2015 11: 42 New
        0
        Yes, they can’t give anything, since there is no this data in social networks. And if they do, then the question immediately arises, if you know why not destroy it?
      6. Altona
        Altona 29 October 2015 11: 52 New
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? They refused, now they stink

        ------------------------------
        Kerry is, oddly enough, right ... Our VKS bomb the north, where the so-called Syrian Free Army and Jebhat An-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria) are located, Washington considers them to be their own ... Of course they are not there a solid front, but what then intersperse with agglomeration, make sorties or occupy the dominant heights or quarters of villages and all that ... But the point is that we are conducting a military operation, there is an extensive section of the Turkish border that serves as a bosom for feeding terrorists and we must block it, to stop the supply of ISIS and replenish recruits, medical care is again in Turkish clinics ... And if you throw bombs in the desert, like the United States and the coalition, then this is absolutely pointless ... But I thought so a year ago when the States loudly announced the bombing ... It does not make sense to sort out the combat, religious and other colors of the terrorists, it’s like in the movies whoever comes comes with the flag on the roof ...
      7. samoletil18
        samoletil18 29 October 2015 13: 03 New
        0
        Here is another. They make gey different from pyd.or. And here they are the same.
      8. ferdiperdozzz
        ferdiperdozzz 29 October 2015 13: 59 New
        0
        Ага, "дать цели"... Пару школ, три госпиталя и 15 барханов ?-))
    2. X Y Z
      X Y Z 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
      +1
      But what for do he need them? He has completely different tasks and these funds only interfere with him. Sometimes their own officials also interfere. For example, the Minister of Defense was summoned to McCain (shown on TV) and he was carefully questioned whether the Russians trained Assad’s opponents to bomb us, whether the Russians bombed those to whom we dropped weapons. The Minister answered all the questions in the negative. And he answered in the affirmative only to the question of whether they can do this in principle. The result was a certain embarrassment. But America is no stranger.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 29 October 2015 11: 16 New
        12
        Вот они "оппоненты" в Европу идут..(большинство мужчины 25-35 лет)))В Сирии лафа закончилась, там русские пришли "Руси ,руси Аллах Акбар..!" Встречайте господа "толирасты"...
        1. EGOrkka
          EGOrkka 29 October 2015 11: 52 New
          +2
          ..... ruin in mourning .... it’s at her funeral the flow of people rushing ... to Europe ... taking away ... the long-awaited freebie. It seems that it’s not fate ... bully
      2. Sid.74
        Sid.74 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
        +3
        The United States will monitor Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria

        How many pathos ... I'm losing weight ... laughing The controllers are bad.
        Who is the US called opposition? An-nusra, which is Alcaida. Are thugs gangsters from 90 countries? The IG, which are Doha mercenaries and who differ from Alcaida except by the name. The mythical SSA, but your generals said that there was no SSA there, it ended all. It dissolved in the IG and AN-nusre.
        Lord, in the US, there is nothing to fix, burn! yes
    3. Greenhorn
      Greenhorn 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
      -1
      "Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime"


      Why not. No wonder Assad came to Moscow. Just what did he promise in return?
    4. Gani
      Gani 29 October 2015 11: 24 New
      +4
      and IG not opponents of the Assad regime? so Kerry is telling the truth. When a jihadist cuts Bosko, he’s from the Islamic State, and as soon as bombs fly on his head, it’s simple - opponent
      barely hearing far in the sky the hum of the approaching SUSHK and MIGs, all the ISIS quickly turn into just almost peaceful Assad regime opponents
    5. vodolaz
      vodolaz 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
      +2
      And what is the fundamental difference between them?
      1. Sid.74
        Sid.74 29 October 2015 11: 30 New
        +4
        Quote: vodolaz
        And what is the fundamental difference between them?

        Some heads cut from right to left, others from left to right.what
    6. milann
      milann 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      +1
      This girl Kerry to lie to scratch.
    7. Hubun
      Hubun 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      +1
      and why not, if this opposition is one with the terrorists
    8. Fox_1959
      Fox_1959 29 October 2015 11: 38 New
      0
      The US will control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic State"

      Well, Kerry turned it out of habit - the horseradish controller.
    9. zanoza
      zanoza 29 October 2015 12: 36 New
      0
      Quote: SS68SS
      It feels like ...

      That every time, after meeting with S. Lavrov, Kerry begins to carry nonsense and nonsense about Russia. What is Lavrov doing to him?
      Все действия России ГосДеп вывёртывает на изнанку: белое у них превращается в чёрное и наоборот. Это схоже, если читать газету "Правда" советских времён и думать о сексе, то все заголовки в ней будут нести именно сексуальный подтекст. Так и тут, если постоянно думать и считать, что Россия "империя зла", то все её действия выглядят для янки как зло, направленное против США.
      Bad, evil State Department propaganda.
    10. NEXUS
      NEXUS 29 October 2015 14: 16 New
      +1
      Quote: SS68SS
      It seems that Kerry does not use any objective control data or intelligence data at all. And neither ours nor ours. (They offered the exchange of information - refused)

      Не все так банально...Скорее всего ,наконец-то очухались от наших "сюрпризов" и действий(месяц находились в прострации),и родили мысль,что мы бомбим не ИГИЛ,а противников Асада.Теперь это все будет подогреваться и бурлить ,как чане экскременты ,при этом дурманя мозги как своим избирателям внутри страны,так и европейским вассалам и холуям.
      Но ,что-то мне подсказывает,что Путин просчитал уже давно такие шаги США и ,думаю скоро будет очередной "сюрпризец" с любовью из России,после которого снова у Вашингтона и Ко наступит прострация.
    11. Gora66
      Gora66 29 October 2015 16: 46 New
      0
      . (They suggested the exchange of information - they refused) .... so it’s understandable why they refused, because you can carry any nonsense without burdening yourself with evidence.
  2. lazma3
    lazma3 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    +1
    Well, let them present a little evidence. and that’s the same blah, blah, blah.
    1. _Alexei_
      _Alexei_ 29 October 2015 11: 05 New
      -1
      Isn’t the igil fighting Assad
  3. Abbra
    Abbra 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    +6
    Во! Нашли для себя нишу! Теперь они "будут контролировать действия России"... А контролирующий орган не отпадёт?
    1. lwxx
      lwxx 29 October 2015 11: 19 New
      +3
      Наверное прочитал книгу" как контролировать вселенную не привлекая внимания санитаров"
    2. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 29 October 2015 11: 22 New
      +1
      They do not control - they just hide the truth. If they admit that Idlib and Aleppo Al Qaeda, it turns out that they helped them with 3 of the year with weapons and advisers. This is an instant collapse of the United States in the Western world. Starting from the fact that 11-September will have to recognize. Well, or at least break off relations with Saudi Arabia if you do not fight.

      But Russia objectively believes that the opposition merged with the Alkaida under the blows of Syria and ISIS from two sides. And bombing.

      Putin, however, is hinting that the United States has played with terrorists trying to use them against opponents. First, the Taliban (Afghanistan + Pakistan), then Alkaida (Iraq + Saudi), then ISIS (Syria + Qatar). And then the invasion of these countries to kill their offspring. Without considering the fact that their partners do not want to do this. Pakistan, Saudis and Qatar simply took advantage of the United States. It was about them that Putin spoke about the mind.
  4. venaya
    venaya 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    +2
    The US will control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic State"

    Good idea, it’s time for us to control everything, absolutely all their actions. Sorry, but this is our continent and we need to control everything that is done here.
  5. Nick
    Nick 29 October 2015 11: 01 New
    +3
    Most have long understood that the US State Department lives in virtual reality, which has nothing to do with objective fool
    1. shuhartred
      shuhartred 29 October 2015 11: 40 New
      +1
      Quote: Nick
      Most have long understood that the US State Department lives in virtual reality, which has nothing to do with objective fool

      And nothing is virtual. This is just an attempt to cling. Our win, well, so under vigilant control и русские вроде как и не при делах. Ну а для отмазки им ничего дополнительно говорить не надо "Это русские (кучаобвиненийвосвсехсмертныхгрехах) во всем виноваты и точка. А мы че, мы ниче мы мирно песок бомбили."
  6. pasha88tt
    pasha88tt 29 October 2015 11: 02 New
    +7
    Howl again, and again when the image crumbles) we do everything right!)
  7. Sashka_Gusar
    Sashka_Gusar 29 October 2015 11: 03 New
    +3
    What idiocy, the most interesting thing is that all of America and Europe believe this.
  8. Denis DV
    Denis DV 29 October 2015 11: 04 New
    +1
    How much more do they have left to repeat this lodge so that it becomes true?
  9. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 29 October 2015 11: 05 New
    +1
    Controllers, you understand :) The control from such control will not break?;)
    1. shuhartred
      shuhartred 29 October 2015 22: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Controllers, you understand :)

      Do not scare fans of STALKER
  10. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
    +5
    against opponents of the Assad regime

    Opponents in parliament. With guns in their hands against the legitimate authority only bandits. To be destroyed.
  11. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
    13
    US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime
    Go where the thread
  12. alex-cn
    alex-cn 29 October 2015 11: 07 New
    +2
    Как-то я не понял, а что, ИГИЛ не является "оппонентом Асада"?
  13. Yuyuka
    Yuyuka 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
    0
    Yes, they control! How many of them fell into this abyss (c) of these controllers ... in bunkers and in the vastness of Syria. The videoconferencing team will gladly reset information for them, even if only the coordinates of the controllers will be reported by intelligence winked
  14. ser-pov
    ser-pov 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
    0
    Let them control ... Further inflating the cheeks in front of the American media, this will not pour out anywhere ...
    1. ultra
      ultra 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      0
      Quote: ser-pov
      Let them control ..

      Интересно,а Керри знает значение слова"контролировать"?
  15. Horn
    Horn 29 October 2015 11: 11 New
    +2
    So to sort terrorists we as BE were not engaged ... Allah will understand ...
  16. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 October 2015 11: 12 New
    0
    Контроллеры - это если есть возможности для контроля. А так - я тоже могу сказать, что контролирую Госдеп. И даже написать об этом. Только кто мне поверит? Полосатоухий гегемон совсем "потерял берега". Надувает щеки, выпучивают глаза, страшно рычат. Но их уже никто не пугается.
  17. Stinger
    Stinger 29 October 2015 11: 13 New
    +1
    Пора применить "Латентные возможности использования вербальных средств общения для оптимизации труда" (пошел на...)
  18. AID.S
    AID.S 29 October 2015 11: 15 New
    +2
    The wild Prapor from DMB answered Gossek for a long time:
    - From here (from Syria), guys, our Motherland dictates its adamant will to the rest of the world community.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 29 October 2015 11: 19 New
      +1
      Quote: AID.S
      The wild Prapor from DMB answered Gossek for a long time:
      - From here (from Syria), guys, our Motherland dictates its adamant will to the rest of the world community.

      Think All Right ..! hi Well, until we dictate, but indicate where their place really is .. (purely in Russian)))))
  19. raid14
    raid14 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
    0
    "Мы хотим контролировать! Попробуйте, "будьте реалистами, требуйте невозможного".
  20. manguest
    manguest 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
    +1
    Again confused soft with warm, in Syria there is a legitimate legal government, which RUSSIA supports legally. Against ALL of his enemies conducting hostilities, of course. In the absence of other grounds, such as a UN resolution, these are the only possible legal actions of a foreign state in Syria. And the partners ’desires, in the absence of the ability to neutralize the actions of RUSSIA, are nothing more than an empty talking room.
  21. Londa
    Londa 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
    +1
    Как сказал один киношный герой:"Такое ощущение, что когда вы говорите-вы бредите"....
  22. eternalmotor
    eternalmotor 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
    +1
    Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."


    So give the coordinates of ISIS, so as not to scam the opponents of Assad, and all things. laughing
  23. mivmim
    mivmim 29 October 2015 11: 22 New
    +3
    most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime

    And who is to blame for the fact that all opponents of the Assad regime are terrorists.
  24. brasist
    brasist 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
    0
    The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.
    Well, how can one not control the striped ones, and so their kirdyk comes to their pets ...
  25. Watchdog
    Watchdog 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
    +1
    Quote:
    "Фундаментальный выбор заключается в том, намерена ли Россия поддерживать (президента Сирии Башара) Асада или помогать в решении проблем (в регионе)"

    мдаа эти тупицы как обычно считают себя умнее всех. любопытная фраза - жесткая дизъюнкция - либо "поддерживать Асада" либо "помогать в решении проблем". однако это ложь - во первых допуская, что мы we help in solving problems, we must ask two questions - whom? and which? If you help the legitimate president in solving problems caused by the unlawful anti-human and aggressive policies of the administration of the American president B.Kh. Obama - this is how we do it, and if we help this administration in solving its problems, this is what we do. It’s just that the U.S. administration has grown weary of its own impudence and impunity, but you know the problem! And we have a couple of pills that can relieve these symptoms. And a couple of injections to boot!
    They will control us. You start to control. hi
  26. Rossiyanin
    Rossiyanin 29 October 2015 11: 26 New
    +1
    The United States will control Russia's actions in the fight against the Islamic State and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.




    I will say that the gut is thin!
  27. vkfriendly
    vkfriendly 29 October 2015 11: 26 New
    0
    Yakunin returned to the treasury 4 billion dollars
    http://nvdaily.ru/info/60679.html
    1. provincial
      provincial 29 October 2015 11: 35 New
      0
      Now it’s the turn of Rosneft’s leaders.
  28. Proud.
    Proud. 29 October 2015 11: 27 New
    0
    "...«Фундаментальный выбор заключается в том, намерена ли Россия поддерживать (президента Сирии Башара) Асада или помогать в решении проблем (в регионе)», - приводит его слова РИА «Новости»..."-Д....,б....!Антропоаморфный мутант.Россия поддерживает того,кто борется с "проблемами" в данном регионе,а заявивший подобный бред,госсекретарь САСШ,представляет тех,кто эту муть ,страшную,заварил.
  29. reactivnyi
    reactivnyi 29 October 2015 11: 32 New
    +1
    You don’t understand whether ours bomb their mercenaries whom they supply and train, they gave us the green light to fight ig, but they didn’t think that it would work out like that, now they’re banging on us that we’re not bombing and the goal is to overthrow Assad from they will never go anywhere - we know the price of them with all a false statement and friendship with anyone .... Assad did not give the go-ahead for piping, so that they would milk Europe and weaken us, and we found underground fresh water in huge the number of (roofing felts in Siri or in Libya - no matter what they smashed everything for their own purposes), in general a lot intertwined there !!!!
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 29 October 2015 11: 37 New
    0
    Most of the Russian bombing is not against IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime
    Вы вот всё время "ошибаетесь" а России что-нельзя? wassat
  32. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 29 October 2015 11: 38 New
    +2
    Exclusively all the bombing of the Russian Air Force is directed against ordinary and unusual killers and terrorists.
    Fuck you on _____________ Kerry ....
  33. aleksfill
    aleksfill 29 October 2015 11: 40 New
    +1
    "....это будет обсуждаться в ходе «дискуссий, которые мы проведем в Вене»..."
    There will be an attempt by the United States to put pressure on Iran, for us it will be a test of the strength of the alliance between Russia and Iran.
    It would be time for Iraq to join Russia and Iran.
  34. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 29 October 2015 11: 43 New
    +2
    According to the Secretary of State, it is quite possible that "the result of this strategy will be the radicalization of the situation," and this will be discussed in the course of the "discussions that we will have in Vienna."

    It must be understood that the Americans will strengthen aid to the militants in order to annoy us and realize our plans. And that they provided it to no one, no doubt, under the guise of moderate help. They shout that we are bombing those whom they trained. It’s contrary to common sense, they are chasing on Sushki for 5 (they themselves confirmed) in the desert.
  35. samara-58
    samara-58 29 October 2015 11: 43 New
    +1
    And you, come to Syria, you’ll sort ... lol
  36. jovanni
    jovanni 29 October 2015 11: 50 New
    +2
    "....по мнению Вашингтона, «это не тот путь, который приведет к решению».

    Yeah, you know the way! How much grief they brought to the world, dolphins ... dol ...
  37. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 29 October 2015 11: 50 New
    +2
    Янки,как всегда, пытаются "И РЫБКУ СЪЕСТЬ И НА Х...Й СЕСТЬ", чувствуя что их планам по смещению Асада взамен на карманного лидера приходит п...ц вот и пытаются баламутить весь мир, хоть как то остановить русских, а своего добиться.
    Мне интересно выражение Л.Сухорукова, как раз по теме: "Перемалывают кости тем, у кого не удалось шкуру содрать"( только они сейчас поняли что наша шкура может такой сдачи дать, что и за сто лет им не опомниться)
  38. stonks
    stonks 29 October 2015 11: 59 New
    +2
    Well, why are they surprised in the USA?
    The Russian Federation has an agreement with the Syrian legal government.
    Naturally, the Russian troops are conducting operations against ALL opponents of the legitimate government of Syria. Even against those that the United States milked from its boobs.
  39. solovey
    solovey 29 October 2015 12: 00 New
    +2
    While the score is 2-0
    1. Crimea controlled controlled and controlled 1-0
    2. Assad shifted shifted and shifted to 2-0 Now, in general, they will lose control in the Middle East.
    So let them control you look until they are controlled before the United States of America becomes unconnected lol
  40. ivan bogomolov
    ivan bogomolov 29 October 2015 12: 01 New
    +1
    Once again, I am convinced that in America everyone is doing their own thing, the electrite turns on the light bulbs, the singer sings, the doctor treats people, and idio ... you look like real idios ... you both externally and internally. negative
    1. Mama_Cholli
      Mama_Cholli 29 October 2015 16: 05 New
      0
      Quote: ivan bogomolov
      Once again, I am convinced that in America everyone is doing their own thing, the electrite turns on the light bulbs, the singer sings, the doctor treats people, and idio ... you look like real idios ... you both externally and internally. negative

      What do you?! in America, it’s also a profession and a vocation: Kerry, McCain, Psaki ....
      By the way, the more natural the image, the higher the payment.
      Talent is especially appreciated ....
      How, for example, was a tanned monkey able to parody a person so well that those with less pay even chose her as their leader?
  41. pts-m
    pts-m 29 October 2015 12: 05 New
    +1
    you look. they don’t know who to bomb or not to bomb, and then they decided. just like bumblebees ... we want it, but we don’t want ... answer gav.nyukov.
  42. shimus
    shimus 29 October 2015 12: 13 New
    +1
    What a coincidence, for some reason, precisely after the bombing by the Russian air forces, the mass exodus of Ishil terrorists began !!! Apparently these are the only opponents of Bashar al-Assad.
  43. Stariknv
    Stariknv 29 October 2015 12: 14 New
    +1
    Before saying so, yes have evidence, but for now this is an unfounded statement.
  44. Wolka
    Wolka 29 October 2015 12: 24 New
    +1
    dear Kerry, at dusk all cats are sulfur, and following your double standards, the opposition is still yesterday, and today it’s a terrorist, right ...
  45. 31rus
    31rus 29 October 2015 12: 32 New
    +1
    Not everything is so simple, today there have already been statements by Carter about the US ground operation in Syria, that's just it is worse than ISIS
  46. Zomanus
    Zomanus 29 October 2015 12: 41 New
    0
    Campaign dude says anything
    without thinking that all this can be verified.
    They are still stuck in the 90's apparently.
  47. mamont5
    mamont5 29 October 2015 13: 59 New
    0
    "Госдеп США: Большинство российских бомбардировок направлены не против ИГ, а против оппонентов режима Асада"
    I would be even more glad if most of the bombing was directed against the United States and the jackals.
  48. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 29 October 2015 14: 39 New
    0
    Russia is an ally of Syria, and is carrying out bombing of rebel forces at the request of the legitimate government of Syria, while the planes and personnel of the Russian air forces are on absolutely legal rights in Syria.
    Let the US State Department better give a clear explanation on what basis the US Air Force and NATO periodically violate the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic?
  49. pvv113
    pvv113 29 October 2015 17: 52 New
    0
    US Secretary of State said in a speech in Washington

    Who did he say? Another cheap farce
  50. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 29 October 2015 19: 03 New
    +4
    Why be ashamed ... who are they to us? Yes, no one! Who is bombing? But who Assad (legal president) asked is bombing. Maybe we generally wilder the gophers of the desert (babahs come under distribution as a side effect) ... it’s not your dog’s business. It used to be that they reported running under Yeltsin. And now Lavrov just has to send them. Put them in their place at every opportunity. And then the others will lay on them.
    In my opinion, the best comment here is about Ukrainians, what mourning they have, then give them the Greeks the money, then the Arabs are refugees ... But what about Tse-Europe? wassat