US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime

The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.




"The fundamental choice is whether Russia intends to support (Syrian President Bashar) Al-Assad or help solve problems (in the region)," the RIA quotes him. "News".

Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."

According to the Secretary of State, it is quite possible that "the result of this strategy will be the radicalization of the situation," and this will be discussed in the course of the "discussions that we will have in Vienna."

The aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces began to deliver pinpoint strikes against militant positions in Syria from September 30 following a request from Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. SS68SS 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    • 19
    • 0
    +19
    "Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime"


    It seems that Kerry does not use any objective control data or intelligence data at all. And neither ours nor ours. (They suggested the exchange of information - they refused) For the merikosov, like the u.kropov, social networks play the role of informants. In Russian, it is called "Magpie on the tail brought." Gossip is collected from all over the network, and then with such a business look they give formality to all the online nonsense ... Shame on you, the Yankees and the Yankees. In addition to a sense of disgust, these ch.moshniki do not cause me anything ... Tfu ...
    1. Vend 29 October 2015 10: 59 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: SS68SS
      “Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime,”

      So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? They refused, now they stink laughing
      1. Temples 29 October 2015 11: 01 New
        • 18
        • 0
        +18
        The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.

        How's that?
        Is he from Budun or something?
        When was the VKS controlled by the State Department?
        Gathered to control the actions of Russia!
        Is he stoned or something?
        Confused with monitoring?
        1. Now we are free 29 October 2015 11: 15 New
          • 12
          • 0
          +12
          Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."
          USA in the face of the restless Kerry, which is already called for ... smiling (talking)
          V.V.P. To the whole world he openly asked the USA:
          -Tell us the position of the caliphate in Syria?
          And in response to silence ...
          -WELL, THEN TELL US WHERE THE POSITION OF MODERATE OPPOSITION?
          And in response to silence ...

          Question -How do you understand if you are not saying anything? .. (GDP)

          PS
          Take a look now they’re also offended that they’re bombing the wrong ones ... the United States seemed to have changed -Only a minute ago it was “Mummy” distributing to the whole world ..., and now it is building up the “Tselochka” which is silent and has lowered its gaze to the floor and in the eyes of "Touchy" tears from the fact that her educated and cultural silence was not understood, appreciated and not forgiven ... (although the latter is from a slightly different comedy series laughing ).
          1. Baikonur 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            My answer to Jim: Most of the Russian bombardments are directed against the Islamic State (IS), and the other "opponents" of the Assad regime go by trailer, in the appendage, so to speak!
            The forest is cut, chips fly! (Russian proverb) Moreover, these "chips" are also terrorists!
            Moderate, fired, stoned or stubborn - what's the difference ?!
            1. bulvas 29 October 2015 11: 36 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              No wonder

              Do not care for them Assad, Isil and everyone else

              Whatever we do, they will find in it a negative for processing their "allies"

              All they need is to find a reason for new attacks on Russia, and there are sanctions, hype in the press, "Russians are evil worse than an igil," etc.

              Pressure on Europe, new weapons, transatlantic partnership

              The game continues

              We can at least save the world from the Martians, or destroy the asteroid on the way to the Earth, all the same it will be "undemocratic" and it will be Russia that will threaten humanity


              It is necessary to search for "igil" on the American continent and to correctly direct it, and to accelerate the melting of ice in Our Arctic, so that they quickly washed away.

              Yesterday on the show, the American said bluntly:
              - The Pentagon is in no hurry to help Russia, it is waiting to get more Russian
              blood was spilled


              I won’t be surprised that the American agent took the girl from the contractor who committed suicide ...

              1. jjj
                jjj 29 October 2015 12: 19 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Yesterday I watched a video: a speech and answers to Sergey Glazyev’s questions from October 23. He expressed a very interesting thought. Now two things are happening to the world: a global change in technology and a change in world order.
                By technology, the locomotives of progress are: medicine (bioengineering, pharmacology, genetics, etc.), culture and art (including leisure and hobbies), education and science. Most of the global investment will go there.
                In the management of the world, the struggle of imperial and integrated systems began. The old imperial system led by America was the result of two world and cold wars. Russia is included in this system as the outlying periphery along with Central Asia. Purely as a raw materials appendage and a colony in the traditional sense.
                At the same time, an integrated system led by China began to take shape. China took advantage of the achievements of the USSR and managed to combine the planning system and the market. That is what gives such a powerful development. But in China, the state stands above the market and regulates it. In Japan and Korea, too, the market and the state were combined. But there the market is a priority. For Russia, the way is to find a balance between the ways of China and Japan. The integrated model includes the BRICS countries. The main principle of the integrated system is respect for the sovereignty of countries. Unlike the imperial system, where only one country has sovereignty, all others are required to fulfill the will of the center.
                So the integrated and imperial systems began the struggle. Based on historical experience, a world war should begin. But now it may not be thermonuclear, with tank breakthroughs and the seizure of territories. It is conducted by economic methods and in the information field using individual regional conflicts, but which occur constantly nearby or within the spheres of interests of the countries against which the war is being waged.
                In fact, from what Glazyev said, it can be concluded that a world war is already underway.
                One more thing is curious. Answering a question about the acclaimed "Glazyev Report", Sergey Yuryevich noted that the report would only be published on October 29 at the Academy of Sciences. It is today. Then it will be posted for public review on the Internet.
              2. _Vladislav_ 29 October 2015 13: 26 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Kerry emphasized that “most of the Russian bombing is not directed against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime”

                The fundamental factor and rationale for the actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces is the request of official Damascus.
                And already whom the VKS are being bombed by ISIS or Uncle Mahmoud’s shed, it is insignificant - if this fully satisfies official Damascus. This is the key point.

                And when Russia makes a claim: “you are not bombing there,” you hear something like an excuse: “No, no, you are what, we are bombing everything correctly.” At the same time, claims by Russia are made by those who are not at all entitled to be there.

                PS
                Diplomacy is a subtle thing, but in my opinion, there is a need to remind our “dear" partners about it more often.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sasha 19871987 29 October 2015 11: 02 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        let your mouth go with soap and water, yes ... the main staff of the terrorists is in the white house ...
        1. vovanpain 29 October 2015 11: 07 New
          • 18
          • 0
          +18
          Quote: Sasha 19871987
          .. the main headquarters of the terrorists is sitting in a white house ...

          Is this scarecrow Kerry about to control Russia? Controlling has not grown yet an unwise person ... US the sky itself warns.
          1. taseka 29 October 2015 12: 09 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I agree!!!! drinks
      3. Kostyar 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime

        But the American bombing is directed exclusively against IS fighters, and not against hospitals and weddings .......
      4. Bort radist 29 October 2015 11: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? Sami refused

        So they have their own here and there. Weapons to both sides throw up - controlled chaos.
      5. amber-50 29 October 2015 11: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yes, they can’t give anything, since there is no this data in social networks. And if they do, then the question immediately arises, if you know why not destroy it?
      6. Altona 29 October 2015 11: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        So who prevents mattresses from giving goals to our flyers? They refused, now they stink

        ------------------------------
        Kerry is, oddly enough, right ... Our VKS bomb the north, where the so-called Syrian Free Army and Jebhat An-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria) are located, Washington considers them to be their own ... Of course they are not there a solid front, but what then intersperse with agglomeration, make sorties or occupy the dominant heights or quarters of villages and all that ... But the point is that we are conducting a military operation, there is an extensive section of the Turkish border that serves as a bosom for feeding terrorists and we must block it, to stop the supply of ISIS and replenish recruits, medical care is again in Turkish clinics ... And if you throw bombs in the desert, like the United States and the coalition, then this is absolutely pointless ... But I thought so a year ago when the States loudly announced the bombing ... It does not make sense to sort out the combat, religious and other colors of the terrorists, it’s like in the movies whoever comes comes with the flag on the roof ...
      7. samoletil18 29 October 2015 13: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Here is another. They make gey different from pyd.or. And here they are the same.
      8. ferdiperdozzz 29 October 2015 13: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yeah, "give goals" ... A couple of schools, three hospitals and 15 dunes? -))
    2. X Y Z 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      But what for do he need them? He has completely different tasks and these funds only interfere with him. Sometimes their own officials also interfere. For example, the Minister of Defense was summoned to McCain (shown on TV) and he was carefully questioned whether the Russians trained Assad’s opponents to bomb us, whether the Russians bombed those to whom we dropped weapons. The Minister answered all the questions in the negative. And he answered in the affirmative only to the question of whether they can do this in principle. The result was a certain embarrassment. But America is no stranger.
      1. MIKHAN 29 October 2015 11: 16 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Here they are "opponents" go to Europe .. (most men 25-35 years old))) In Syria, the Lafa ended, there the Russians came "Rus, Rus Allah Akbar ..!" Meet the gentlemen "Tolirasti" ...
        1. EGOrkka 29 October 2015 11: 52 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          ..... ruin in mourning .... it’s at her funeral the flow of people rushing ... to Europe ... taking away ... the long-awaited freebie. It seems that it’s not fate ... bully
      2. Sid.74 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        The United States will monitor Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria

        How many pathos ... I'm losing weight ... laughing The controllers are bad.
        Who is the US called opposition? An-nusra, which is Alcaida. Are thugs gangsters from 90 countries? The IG, which are Doha mercenaries and who differ from Alcaida except by the name. The mythical SSA, but your generals said that there was no SSA there, it ended all. It dissolved in the IG and AN-nusre.
        Lord, in the US, there is nothing to fix, burn! yes
    3. Greenhorn 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      "Most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime"


      Why not. No wonder Assad came to Moscow. Just what did he promise in return?
    4. Gani 29 October 2015 11: 24 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      and IG not opponents of the Assad regime? so Kerry is telling the truth. When a jihadist cuts Bosko, he’s from the Islamic State, and as soon as bombs fly on his head, it’s simple - opponent
      barely hearing far in the sky the hum of the approaching SUSHK and MIGs, all the ISIS quickly turn into just almost peaceful Assad regime opponents
    5. vodolaz 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And what is the fundamental difference between them?
      1. Sid.74 29 October 2015 11: 30 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: vodolaz
        And what is the fundamental difference between them?

        Some heads cut from right to left, others from left to right.what
    6. milann 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      This girl Kerry to lie to scratch.
    7. Hubun 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      and why not, if this opposition is one with the terrorists
    8. Fox_1959 29 October 2015 11: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The US will control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic State"

      Well, Kerry turned it out of habit - the horseradish controller.
    9. zanoza 29 October 2015 12: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: SS68SS
      It feels like ...

      That every time, after meeting with S. Lavrov, Kerry begins to carry nonsense and nonsense about Russia. What is Lavrov doing to him?
      The State Department turns all actions of Russia inside out: their white turns to black and vice versa. This is similar, if you read the newspaper "Pravda" of the Soviet era and think about sex, then all the headlines in it will carry exactly the sexual subtext. So here, if you constantly think and believe that Russia is an “empire of evil”, then all its actions look to the Yankees as evil directed against the United States.
      Bad, evil State Department propaganda.
    10. NEXUS 29 October 2015 14: 16 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: SS68SS
      It seems that Kerry does not use any objective control data or intelligence data at all. And neither ours nor ours. (They offered the exchange of information - refused)

      Not everything is so banal ... Most likely, we finally found ourselves from our "surprises" and actions (they were in prostration for a month), and the idea that we were bombing not ISIS but Assad’s opponents was born. Now it will all heat up and boil, as vats are excrement, while stupefying the brains of both their domestic voters and European vassals and lackeys.
      But something tells me that Putin has long been counting such steps by the United States, and I think soon there will be another “surprise” with love from Russia, after which again Washington and Co. will be prostrated.
    11. Gora66 29 October 2015 16: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      . (They suggested the exchange of information - they refused) .... so it’s understandable why they refused, because you can carry any nonsense without burdening yourself with evidence.
  2. lazma3 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, let them present a little evidence. and that’s the same blah, blah, blah.
    1. _Alexei_ 29 October 2015 11: 05 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Isn’t the igil fighting Assad
  3. Abbra 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    In! Found a niche for yourself! Now they "will control the actions of Russia" ... But the regulatory body will not fall away?
    1. lwxx 29 October 2015 11: 19 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Probably read the book "How to control the universe without attracting the attention of orderlies"
    2. KG_patriot_last 29 October 2015 11: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      They do not control - they just hide the truth. If they admit that Idlib and Aleppo Al Qaeda, it turns out that they helped them with 3 of the year with weapons and advisers. This is an instant collapse of the United States in the Western world. Starting from the fact that 11-September will have to recognize. Well, or at least break off relations with Saudi Arabia if you do not fight.

      But Russia objectively believes that the opposition merged with the Alkaida under the blows of Syria and ISIS from two sides. And bombing.

      Putin, however, is hinting that the United States has played with terrorists trying to use them against opponents. First, the Taliban (Afghanistan + Pakistan), then Alkaida (Iraq + Saudi), then ISIS (Syria + Qatar). And then the invasion of these countries to kill their offspring. Without considering the fact that their partners do not want to do this. Pakistan, Saudis and Qatar simply took advantage of the United States. It was about them that Putin spoke about the mind.
  4. venaya 29 October 2015 10: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The US will control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic State"

    Good idea, it’s time for us to control everything, absolutely all their actions. Sorry, but this is our continent and we need to control everything that is done here.
  5. Nick 29 October 2015 11: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Most have long understood that the US State Department lives in virtual reality, which has nothing to do with objective fool
    1. shuhartred 29 October 2015 11: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Nick
      Most have long understood that the US State Department lives in virtual reality, which has nothing to do with objective fool

      And nothing is virtual. This is just an attempt to cling. Our win, well, so under vigilant control and Russians seem to be out of business. Well, to excuse them, they don’t need to say anything extra. "It’s the Russians (a bunch of accusations of all deadly sins) that’s to blame for everything.
  6. pasha88tt 29 October 2015 11: 02 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Howl again, and again when the image crumbles) we do everything right!)
  7. Sashka_Gusar 29 October 2015 11: 03 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    What idiocy, the most interesting thing is that all of America and Europe believe this.
  8. Denis DV 29 October 2015 11: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    How much more do they have left to repeat this lodge so that it becomes true?
  9. Mikhail Krapivin 29 October 2015 11: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Controllers, you understand :) The control from such control will not break?;)
    1. shuhartred 29 October 2015 22: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Controllers, you understand :)

      Do not scare fans of STALKER
  10. Mikhail m 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    against opponents of the Assad regime

    Opponents in parliament. With guns in their hands against the legitimate authority only bandits. To be destroyed.
  11. rf xnumx 29 October 2015 11: 06 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    US Department of State: Most Russian bombings are directed not against the IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime
    Go where the thread
  12. alex-cn 29 October 2015 11: 07 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Somehow I did not understand, but what, ISIS is not an "opponent of Assad"?
  13. Yuyuka 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, they control! How many of them fell into this abyss (c) of these controllers ... in bunkers and in the vastness of Syria. The videoconferencing team will gladly reset information for them, even if only the coordinates of the controllers will be reported by intelligence winked
  14. ser-pov 29 October 2015 11: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Let them control ... Further inflating the cheeks in front of the American media, this will not pour out anywhere ...
    1. ultra 29 October 2015 11: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ser-pov
      Let them control ..

      Interestingly, does Kerry know the meaning of the word "control"?
  15. Horn 29 October 2015 11: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So to sort terrorists we as BE were not engaged ... Allah will understand ...
  16. Mountain shooter 29 October 2015 11: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Controllers - this is if there is room for control. And so - I can also say that I control the State Department. And even write about it. Only who will believe me? Striped hegemon completely "lost the coast." He puffs out his cheeks, bulges his eyes, growls terribly. But nobody is afraid of them anymore.
  17. Stinger 29 October 2015 11: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It's time to apply the "Latent possibilities of using verbal means of communication to optimize labor" (went for ...)
  18. AID.S 29 October 2015 11: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The wild Prapor from DMB answered Gossek for a long time:
    - From here (from Syria), guys, our Motherland dictates its adamant will to the rest of the world community.
    1. MIKHAN 29 October 2015 11: 19 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: AID.S
      The wild Prapor from DMB answered Gossek for a long time:
      - From here (from Syria), guys, our Motherland dictates its adamant will to the rest of the world community.

      Think All Right ..! hi Well, until we dictate, but indicate where their place really is .. (purely in Russian)))))
  19. raid14 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "We want to control! Try it," be realistic, demand the impossible. "
  20. manguest 29 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Again confused soft with warm, in Syria there is a legitimate legal government, which RUSSIA supports legally. Against ALL of his enemies conducting hostilities, of course. In the absence of other grounds, such as a UN resolution, these are the only possible legal actions of a foreign state in Syria. And the partners ’desires, in the absence of the ability to neutralize the actions of RUSSIA, are nothing more than an empty talking room.
  21. Londa 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As one cinematic hero said: "It feels like when you speak, you are raving" ....
  22. eternalmotor 29 October 2015 11: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Kerry stressed that "the majority of Russian bombardments are directed not against the" Islamic State "(IG), but against opponents of the Assad regime," and, according to Washington, "this is not the path that will lead to a solution."


    So give the coordinates of ISIS, so as not to scam the opponents of Assad, and all things. laughing
  23. mivmim 29 October 2015 11: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    most of the Russian bombing is not against the Islamic State (IS), but against opponents of the Assad regime

    And who is to blame for the fact that all opponents of the Assad regime are terrorists.
  24. brasist 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The US Secretary of State said during a speech in Washington that the United States would control Russia's actions in the fight against the "Islamic state" and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.
    Well, how can one not control the striped ones, and so their kirdyk comes to their pets ...
  25. Watchdog 29 October 2015 11: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote:
    "The fundamental choice is whether Russia intends to support (Syrian President Bashar) Assad or help solve problems (in the region)"

    mdaa these dumbasses as usual consider themselves smarter than everyone. a curious phrase - harsh disjunction - either "support Assad" or "help solve problems." however, this is a lie - first assuming that we we help in solving problems, we must ask two questions - whom? and which? If you help the legitimate president in solving problems caused by the unlawful anti-human and aggressive policies of the administration of the American president B.Kh. Obama - this is how we do it, and if we help this administration in solving its problems, this is what we do. It’s just that the U.S. administration has grown weary of its own impudence and impunity, but you know the problem! And we have a couple of pills that can relieve these symptoms. And a couple of injections to boot!
    They will control us. You start to control. hi
  26. Rossiyanin 29 October 2015 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The United States will control Russia's actions in the fight against the Islamic State and the elimination of the crisis in Syria.




    I will say that the gut is thin!
  27. vkfriendly 29 October 2015 11: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yakunin returned to the treasury 4 billion dollars
    http://nvdaily.ru/info/60679.html
    1. provincial 29 October 2015 11: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Now it’s the turn of Rosneft’s leaders.
  28. Proud. 29 October 2015 11: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "..." The fundamental choice is whether Russia intends to support (Syrian President Bashar) Assad or help solve problems (in the region), "RIA Novosti quoted him as saying ..." - D .... , b ....! Anthropo-amorphous mutant. Russia supports the one who is struggling with "problems" in this region, and the USA Secretary of State, who declared such nonsense, represents those who have brewed this terrible, terrible.
  29. reactivnyi 29 October 2015 11: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    You don’t understand whether ours bomb their mercenaries whom they supply and train, they gave us the green light to fight ig, but they didn’t think that it would work out like that, now they’re banging on us that we’re not bombing and the goal is to overthrow Assad from they will never go anywhere - we know the price of them with all a false statement and friendship with anyone .... Assad did not give the go-ahead for piping, so that they would milk Europe and weaken us, and we found underground fresh water in huge the number of (roofing felts in Siri or in Libya - no matter what they smashed everything for their own purposes), in general a lot intertwined there !!!!
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. VNP1958PVN 29 October 2015 11: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Most of the Russian bombing is not against IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime
    You’re “wrong” all the time, but is it impossible for Russia? wassat
  32. Mama_Cholli 29 October 2015 11: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Exclusively all the bombing of the Russian Air Force is directed against ordinary and unusual killers and terrorists.
    Fuck you on _____________ Kerry ....
  33. aleksfill 29 October 2015 11: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    ".... this will be discussed in the course of the" discussions that we will hold in Vienna "..."
    There will be an attempt by the United States to put pressure on Iran, for us it will be a test of the strength of the alliance between Russia and Iran.
    It would be time for Iraq to join Russia and Iran.
  34. Yuri Y. 29 October 2015 11: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    According to the Secretary of State, it is quite possible that "the result of this strategy will be the radicalization of the situation," and this will be discussed in the course of the "discussions that we will have in Vienna."

    It must be understood that the Americans will strengthen aid to the militants in order to annoy us and realize our plans. And that they provided it to no one, no doubt, under the guise of moderate help. They shout that we are bombing those whom they trained. It’s contrary to common sense, they are chasing on Sushki for 5 (they themselves confirmed) in the desert.
  35. samara-58 29 October 2015 11: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And you, come to Syria, you’ll sort ... lol
  36. jovanni 29 October 2015 11: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    ".... according to Washington," this is not the path that will lead to a solution. "

    Yeah, you know the way! How much grief they brought to the world, dolphins ... dol ...
  37. vlad.svargin 29 October 2015 11: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The Yankees, as always, are trying to “EAT THE FISH AND FOR THE X ... SIT”, feeling that their plans to displace Assad come in exchange for a pocket leader ... and they are trying to balamute the whole world, at least somehow stop the Russians, and achieve yours.
    I’m interested in the expression of L. Sukhorukov, just on the topic: “They grind the bones of those who didn’t manage to tear their skin” (they only now realized that our skin could give such a change that they won’t recover in a hundred years)
  38. stonks 29 October 2015 11: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, why are they surprised in the USA?
    The Russian Federation has an agreement with the Syrian legal government.
    Naturally, the Russian troops are conducting operations against ALL opponents of the legitimate government of Syria. Even against those that the United States milked from its boobs.
  39. solovey 29 October 2015 12: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    While the score is 2-0
    1. Crimea controlled controlled and controlled 1-0
    2. Assad shifted shifted and shifted to 2-0 Now, in general, they will lose control in the Middle East.
    So let them control you look until they are controlled before the United States of America becomes unconnected lol
  40. ivan bogomolov 29 October 2015 12: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Once again, I am convinced that in America everyone is doing their own thing, the electrite turns on the light bulbs, the singer sings, the doctor treats people, and idio ... you look like real idios ... you both externally and internally. negative
    1. Mama_Cholli 29 October 2015 16: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ivan bogomolov
      Once again, I am convinced that in America everyone is doing their own thing, the electrite turns on the light bulbs, the singer sings, the doctor treats people, and idio ... you look like real idios ... you both externally and internally. negative

      What do you?! in America, it’s also a profession and a vocation: Kerry, McCain, Psaki ....
      By the way, the more natural the image, the higher the payment.
      Talent is especially appreciated ....
      How, for example, was a tanned monkey able to parody a person so well that those with less pay even chose her as their leader?
  41. pts-m 29 October 2015 12: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    you look. they don’t know who to bomb or not to bomb, and then they decided. just like bumblebees ... we want it, but we don’t want ... answer gav.nyukov.
  42. shimus 29 October 2015 12: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What a coincidence, for some reason, precisely after the bombing by the Russian air forces, the mass exodus of Ishil terrorists began !!! Apparently these are the only opponents of Bashar al-Assad.
  43. Stariknv 29 October 2015 12: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Before saying so, yes have evidence, but for now this is an unfounded statement.
  44. Wolka 29 October 2015 12: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    dear Kerry, at dusk all cats are sulfur, and following your double standards, the opposition is still yesterday, and today it’s a terrorist, right ...
  45. 31rus 29 October 2015 12: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Not everything is so simple, today there have already been statements by Carter about the US ground operation in Syria, that's just it is worse than ISIS
  46. Zomanus 29 October 2015 12: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Campaign dude says anything
    without thinking that all this can be verified.
    They are still stuck in the 90's apparently.
  47. mamont5 29 October 2015 13: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "US Department of State: Most Russian bombing is not against IS, but against opponents of the Assad regime."
    I would be even more glad if most of the bombing was directed against the United States and the jackals.
  48. Dimon19661 29 October 2015 14: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russia is an ally of Syria, and is carrying out bombing of rebel forces at the request of the legitimate government of Syria, while the planes and personnel of the Russian air forces are on absolutely legal rights in Syria.
    Let the US State Department better give a clear explanation on what basis the US Air Force and NATO periodically violate the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic?
  49. pvv113 29 October 2015 17: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    US Secretary of State said in a speech in Washington

    Who did he say? Another cheap farce
  50. BARKHAN 29 October 2015 19: 03 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Why be ashamed ... who are they to us? Yes, no one! Who is bombing? But who Assad (legal president) asked is bombing. Maybe we generally wilder the gophers of the desert (babahs come under distribution as a side effect) ... it’s not your dog’s business. It used to be that they reported running under Yeltsin. And now Lavrov just has to send them. Put them in their place at every opportunity. And then the others will lay on them.
    In my opinion, the best comment here is about Ukrainians, what mourning they have, then give them the Greeks the money, then the Arabs are refugees ... But what about Tse-Europe? wassat