NATO: Moscow could help the Western coalition to destroy the IS, but in reality it only prolongs the conflict

Russia can help the Western coalition destroy the terrorists in Syria and stop the war, but for this it needs to abandon the support of Assad, reports RIA News Statement by NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow.




“Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, contributing to the establishment of much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, its actions only prolong the war, exacerbating the sufferings of people ”,
said Vershbow at the Madrid conference on “NATO and a new round of crisis.”

"Instead of fighting against ISIS on the side of the coalition of the countries of the region and NATO allies led by the United States, Russia is concentrating its firepower on strengthening the position of its" client ", the regime of President Assad," the secretary general added.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. iConst 29 October 2015 09: 39 New
    • 47
    • 0
    +47
    Began to boil ...

    "Under the blows of Russian aviation, innocent US money is dying!"
    1. Lyton 29 October 2015 09: 45 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Sanya, but should you go to drink kefir.
      1. BilliBoms09 29 October 2015 09: 53 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8

        “Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, helping to establish much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, her actions only prolong the war, increasing the suffering of people ”
        I agree with almost everything, only three words change “from Russia” to “from NATO”, “ISIS” to “bandera-fascists” and “in Syria” to “in Ukraine”. And in the case, the American coalition has been bombing ISIS for almost two years and ISIS has only intensified, and Russia has been two months old and ...
      2. Sasha 19871987 29 October 2015 10: 57 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        yes, well, it’s NATO, they are already prolonging what year the conflict is in Afghanistan and in Iraq, so people are not judging by themselves !!! Let your brain think before you open your mouth
    2. Finches 29 October 2015 09: 47 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Good day, Konstantin! hi
      What else can an old Russophobe say - Vershbow, a vegetable grown in the stinking greenhouses of the US State Department!
      1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 29 October 2015 10: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Rather, incibil with the look of a castrated ram!
    3. Imperialkolorad 29 October 2015 09: 57 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      “Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, contributing to the establishment of much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, its actions only prolong the war, exacerbating the sufferings of people ”,
      We all see the stability that the NATO forces brought to the Middle East and North Africa, including. The most typical measurement is Libya. Where, with a light movement, the country from rather developed socialism slipped into unbridled feudalism with tribal lawlessness.
    4. vodolaz 29 October 2015 10: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Sanya just made my day))) To carry such nonsense in all seriousness is a talent!
    5. Geisenberg 29 October 2015 14: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: iConst
      Began to boil ...

      "Under the blows of Russian aviation, innocent US money is dying!"


      So they said openly what they were doing in Syria.
  2. AdekvatNICK 29 October 2015 09: 40 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    help america? never. We do not help terrorists. Our hand will not rise to bomb schools and hospitals.
  3. MIKHAN 29 October 2015 09: 41 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Destroyed S. Hussein, M. Gaddafi, bloodshed pours river and refugees sea ... Assad will not surrender! So know the ghouls!
    1. AdekvatNICK 29 October 2015 10: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      and MIKHAN is always positive. We’ll kill all the adversaries, destroy everything and build paradise.
      1. MIKHAN 29 October 2015 10: 07 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        and MIKHAN is always positive. We’ll kill all the adversaries, destroy everything and build paradise.

        Alas, no ... the USA unleashed a bloody massacre after Yugoslavia, feeling impunity. There is a war for Russia in Syria (it was also in Afghanistan) .. We’ll leave all the khan, dig trenches in the yards ... What a positive thing! angry
        1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 29 October 2015 10: 32 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          So it has already passed! In Khrushchev's times, the Yankees massively built bomb shelters, taught civil defense in schools! And Khrushchev promised to show "Kuzkin’s mother" and bury!
      2. Sober 29 October 2015 16: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Sometimes, you need to think about why a person says so, maybe it will become clear?
  4. Hubun 29 October 2015 09: 42 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    here it sometimes begins to enrage how all the inside out show. In the extension of the conflict is not to blame the Russian Federation
    1. Karabanov 29 October 2015 10: 05 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      “Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, helping to establish much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, her actions only prolong the war, increasing the suffering of people ”

      First I wanted to give a detailed comment, and then I thought ... Yes, they go on ...
      1. asar 29 October 2015 10: 19 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Yes, they go on ...

        I agree, Roman!


        give up support for Assad

        Our answer is
      2. asar 29 October 2015 10: 23 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And yet, for them - but (this vegetable) to you, and Assad!
  5. Brown 29 October 2015 09: 44 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Well, what can I say, they are not embarrassed to say who is behind ISIS and what needs to be done to stop funding and support for ISIS. All this is disgusting, it is a pity that you can’t slam all of this shusher at one moment, you see everyone would live easier. And the most interesting is not a word about the "opposition" so beloved in the West.
    1. veksha50 29 October 2015 10: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Brown
      And the most interesting is not a word about the "opposition" so beloved in the West.


      However, they do not forget to condition the overthrow of Assad ... Here you have the answer about the "opposition" ...

      PS They demand that Assad be removed ... And they have never mentioned a single name of a leader applying for this position ...

      They probably want, as in Ukraine, to create a government consisting of US citizens and some other states ...
      1. asar 29 October 2015 12: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        "they are"
        Demand to remove Assad

        From us (to say the least) -
  6. Abakan 29 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    squealing "female dogs" wassat green candy wrappers lose))) oh lose
  7. raid14 29 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Yeah right now. Not so long ago Gaddafi was given into your "good" hands and ???
    "Maybe you also have the key to the apartment where the money is!"
  8. pasha88tt 29 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Let them legally put together a coalition first, and then talk. Although by that time there might not be a igil, and something else ...)))
    1. Sober 29 October 2015 16: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, they can’t be on the legal, they can’t! Otherwise, they are not exceptional.
  9. mpzss 29 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I respect Assad! so annoy Amer that they roar, moan and tear their hair in the most intimate places !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  10. Denis DV 29 October 2015 09: 46 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Miracle is not aware that NATO does not steer in the Middle East. From NATO and the USA, a fighter against terrorism, as from Hitler the chairman of the council of fairies and elves laughing
  11. Dreiko11 29 October 2015 09: 47 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    here ... they didn’t do anything against IS for everyone criticizes
  12. ArhipenkoAndrey 29 October 2015 09: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As he gently farted, the fact that the Americans of the hospital equal the earth - this adds stability to the region, makes the desert more deserted with bombs - this is also an uncompromising fight against ISIS, but to defile Russia is a struggle for democracy and world peace, but in general it looks like a cry of despair.
  13. Reptiloid 29 October 2015 09: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The last paragraph should be corrected: “Instead of fighting ISIS for centuries, on the side of NATO, the USA, Saudi ..., etc. for a long, tedious, inconclusive and expensive without hope of success.
    RUSSIA showed everyone what to do with the aggressors!
  14. BOB044 29 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2

    "Instead of fighting ISIS on the side of the coalition of countries in the region and NATO allies led by the United States, Russia is concentrating its firepower on strengthening the position of its" client ", the regime of President Assad," the Secretary General added.
    On the side of which coalition, which NATO allies. The countries that sleep and see Russia in the form of a bear skin stretched on the wall in the living room. You are completely stoned there. You are the parents of ISIS. You are absolutely sick there in NATO. fool
  15. atamankko 29 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The reasoning of the deaf-mute cat will be much smarter.
  16. Altona 29 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And the whole year, the coalition "eased" the suffering of people? They squeal because our pilots bombed several weapons depots that the Saudis, Qatar and the West carefully transported there, because the Syrian national army is conducting an offensive in the north, cutting off militants from the Turkish border, beyond which it’s good ... Something these people don’t the bombed hospitals in Afghanistan and Yemen, as well as wedding celebrations, where 200 people die right away ... Strange some kind of humanism similar to masochism ...
  17. Alexander Romanov 29 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Russia can help the Western coalition destroy terrorists in Syria and end the war, but for this it needs to abandon Assad’s support
    Not long ago, I already heard this, but not a lot of the name was different ....
    Russia can help stop the warrior in Ukraine, but for this it needs to abandon the support of the separatists.
    1. Amurets 29 October 2015 10: 17 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Russia can stop the war if it destroys NATO headquarters in Brussels. Then, even a balcony in the West, no one will bear
    2. Sober 29 October 2015 16: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Competent comparison. Without fussing
  18. Uncle lee 29 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    A strange conclusion: Russia is bombing IS at the request of Assad - this is prolong the war, increasing the suffering of people, ", and if it bombed the coalition with NATO, it would be a peacemaker. They are not all right with logic!
  19. Gani 29 October 2015 09: 55 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    NATO: Moscow could help the Western coalition to destroy the IS, but in reality it only prolongs the conflict

    damn it! and they are a little bit right - help Moscow IS allies coalition to finish off Syria and Assad - and the war would end and the IS in Syria would not be needed - in an instant the most sane and controlled would be called more democratically and put in oil-bearing areas (well, or they would not be called in any way, like in Libya). And the remaining 90 percent, after they finish cutting the Alawites, Copts, etc. "infidels", would quickly be evacuated to the border of Afghanistan with Tajikistan to fight the Taliban ... especially in Tajikistan ...
    Well, part of the most dull would have to be shot of course ...

    And here the Russian Federation - everywhere interferes, it’s just that it’s free to live freely and it doesn’t allow you to calmly engage in the oil, arms and drugs business! Yes, and he still wants to cut the cables - barbarians!
    So the guy in the photo froze in his eyes a dumb question - what the hell?
    1. brn521 29 October 2015 10: 21 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Gani
      damn it! and they are a little bit right

      Why a little bit? Clear text. All the fuss was started to solve two issues. 1. start a butch, discarding another country of the region in the Stone Age. 2. to remove Assad, who is unstable, uncontrollable, and does not want to in the Stone Age. And then ours showed up and began to help Assad restore order in the region. Of course, the sponsors of the concert will not like this business and they will take action. The "moderate opposition" will receive additional funding and more modern weapons.
  20. pvv113 29 October 2015 09: 58 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    fight ISIS on the side of the coalition of countries in the region and NATO allies led by the United States

    It means bombing the desert, destroying weddings, watering excavators, smashing up hospitals
    1. Sober 29 October 2015 17: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: pvv113
      It means bombing the desert, destroying weddings, watering excavators, smashing up hospitals

      And be democrats.
  21. Russia 29 October 2015 09: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, contributing to the establishment of much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, its actions only prolong the war, exacerbating the sufferings of people ”,

    The simplest comment on this:
    "Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah blah. Blah blah blah yushki!"
  22. Mountain shooter 29 October 2015 10: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, what can they say? Sorry, we got it wrong, unravel us? Referring to the name of our president.
    Of course, Russia is to blame for everything. The Arab spring failed, turned into bloody chaos. Unmanageable, however. And everything went towards the creation of a Salafi state in Iraq and Syria with unpredictable consequences for the entire BV. And then Russia lowered the barrier. And somehow it turned out to be solid, not to get around, not to jump over.
    So the brains of all politicians, including the NATO ones, began to boil. Moreover, with mockingly small forces, they achieved serious military results, showing that coalition aviation is an operetta army that is not able to solve any serious tasks.
  23. veksha50 29 October 2015 10: 06 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria"...


    No...

    This theoretical opportunity - to help Assad and Russia in the fight against ISIS and end the war in Syria, is with NATO ...

    However, both the United States in particular and NATO as a whole have completely different, diametrically opposite goals ...
  24. V.ic 29 October 2015 10: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Native American hut to the gentlemen of NATO! They have their own "wedding", and we have our own.
  25. This 29 October 2015 10: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Fighting with terrorists together with the United States is the same as casting out demons in the name of Beelzevulov.
  26. Vadim12 29 October 2015 10: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This very “coalition” is just the same interested in prolonging the conflict. The Russian Federation has just begun to support it, and the six have been bombing terrorists for a long time, the result is excellent: IS has increased its influence.
    It was immediately clear that they would start to stink, because it is known to whom and whose interests NATO commanders serve. They understood that they could not overcome Syria. Nothing to rub off, not the first time.
  27. popandopulo 29 October 2015 10: 11 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    hey Vershbow, name at least one incentive for Russia to spend its resources and risk the precious lives of its miraculous heroes to help Western villains.
    1. Amurets 29 October 2015 10: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Only destroy these villains.
  28. Denis Skiff 29 October 2015 10: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    as soon as they don’t dance ...
  29. Michael 29 October 2015 10: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The West is the organizer of all the outrages. The Third World is in full swing angry !
  30. vladimirw 29 October 2015 10: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    it is necessary to help the United States and NATO strengthen their positions in the world, in the B. East ?! The roof went completely!
  31. Stariknv 29 October 2015 10: 21 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Russia supports real power in Syria, and NATO, in this situation, will take some opposition away from us along the way.
  32. Stinger 29 October 2015 10: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The east cannot help the west. Because because of Assad alone, the West destroyed an entire prosperous state. Now let them arrange refugees, accustom them to same-sex marriages and other "values."
  33. Oleg1080 29 October 2015 10: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This is Luntik ... (fell from the moon)
  34. Sagittarius YaNAO 29 October 2015 10: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Did he get out of the fridge? Stuck in the past halfwit.
    1. demo 29 October 2015 10: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      No.
      If you try to understand him. one conclusion suggests itself - this is a biological robot. who was removed all thoughts, feelings, desires, etc., and forced to broadcast a program written in one of the laboratories supervised by the White House.
  35. Lelek 29 October 2015 10: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “Instead of fighting ISIS on the side of the coalition of countries in the region and NATO allies led by the United States, Russia is concentrating its firepower on strengthening the position of its“ client, ”the regime of President Assad.”

    Yes, you would go ...
  36. demo 29 October 2015 10: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Instead of fighting ISIS on the side of the coalition of countries in the region and NATO allies led by the United States .....

    There is a good Russian proverb.
    "The goose is not a pig comrade."
  37. Batia 29 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Is he not a relative of Psaki? Tangled flanks and phalanges. Vegetable to him in a hemorrhoids, then he can understand.
  38. Kibl 29 October 2015 11: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Butted these sheep of NATO, with such tenacity they stick to Assad that suspicions about the sanity of these members creep in! Paranoid patients! Burn them in hell!
  39. brasist 29 October 2015 11: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    NATO doesn’t even try to destroy the "ig" but only covers them, and they need to be told not to help destroy but help not to destroy.
  40. BARKHAN 29 October 2015 11: 45 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    But if the “comrades” from the coalition do not want to publish the video of ISIS attacks, I’m sure that they, like ours, fix everything. Chur ... excavators and hospitals do not offer. If everything is honest and noble there, so why not hide it. Where to shoot from a satellite of 50 tons of “something” where and to whom it was transported? By the way, I hope ours also tracked this moment.
    65 COUNTRIES in the "coalition", but it’s just an armada ... only everything looks like a soap bubble, inside there is only one air.
  41. ARES623 29 October 2015 12: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The howl of the West around the problem of Syria and refugees transparently demonstrates both the customers of the "chaos" and the performers. The fact that the West is two-faced and cynical to disgrace does not know only the patient of the morgue. Therefore, all the statements of NATO generals can be predicted without being a psychic. And about the coalition with NATO, read the United States, and it’s dangerous to think, then you won’t wash yourself off. And they themselves either break all contacts and expel Russian representatives from NATO from headquarters, or complain about our non-participation ... You guys, either remove the cross or straighten the cassock ... something like that ...
  42. Rusich1980 29 October 2015 12: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “Theoretically, Russia has the opportunity to help destroy ISIS and end the war in Syria, contributing to the establishment of much-needed stability in the region. But in reality, its actions only prolong the war, exacerbating the sufferings of people ”,

    Well, then ... Again, Russia is to blame for everything, and these white and fluffy NATs for more than a year brought only love and prosperity to the Syrian people. Delivery of the warmest love and care in any container, hypocrites of hell ... Already there is not even anger at such statements. Just another confirmation that having such “friends” is not necessary for enemies.
  43. WUS 068 29 October 2015 13: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The key phrase is "led by the United States." Would you walk the forest, "exceptional" or "excluded" (which is better?)
  44. Shuttle 29 October 2015 13: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    need to abandon Assad’s support

    And at the same time automatically lose relations with the government of Iran, Iraq.
  45. Riv
    Riv 29 October 2015 13: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Do you smell cigarette smoke? This Zadornov nervously smokes on the sidelines ...

    Let's say tomorrow Putin officially declares that Russia no longer supports Assad. Everyone applaud while standing. A week passes, Russian planes continue to bomb IS positions. WTF ??? Further dialogue:
    - What are you doing?
    - We bomb terrorists.
    - But what about Assad?
    - And what does Assad have to do with it?
    “But he benefits from it!”
    - Does anyone have anything ...
    Assad from afar:
    - Russians don't bother me! Let them fly and bomb anyone they want.

    After that, everyone finally ceases to understand something and Obama gives everyone the trademark Syrian ganjubas.
  46. mamont5 29 October 2015 13: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "Russia can help the Western coalition to destroy terrorists in Syria and end the war, but for this it needs to give up support for Assad, the statement of NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow reports to RIA Novosti."
    To overshadow you, the jackals of Amer! Not by washing, so by skating they try to achieve their goal. But figs to you, rat rats!
  47. viscount 29 October 2015 14: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Really got my whining !!!! They bombed for several years, do not understand what, but the result is zero!
    He would have finished his sentence: "... how the USSR helped the West end with fascism in Germany ..."
    Indeed, this is how they raise their children that Russia helped Hitler destroy the fuse !!!
    U.ro.d. !!!!!!
  48. Abakan 29 October 2015 15: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Abakan
    squealing "female dogs" green candy wrappers lose))) oh lose

    Manshut (or ebelovich) again bans me, what have I done ???