New Orlan-10 UAVs arrived at the military base in Armenia

The UAV unit at the Russian base in Armenia has received modern Orlan-10 reconnaissance complexes, reports MIC with reference to the information of the Southern Military District.




"UAVs will monitor the extended and local objects in the highlands, as well as providing training for combat training units of the military base at the Kamkhud and Alagyaz", - said in a release.

The press service noted that “the Orlan-10 complex is capable of operating in any weather conditions at distances from 120 to 600 km at maximum altitude up to 5 kilometers.”
Photos used:
http://bla-orlan.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimyrych 28 October 2015 17: 57 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The necessary business of UAVs. IMHO specifically for reconnaissance, additional reconnaissance and target designation.
    I am wary of drums ...
    1. Temples 28 October 2015 18: 00 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      UAV unit at the Russian base in Armenia received modern reconnaissance complexes “Olan-10”

      Editors, where are you ???
      Or how are you called today?
      "Olans" or is it "Eagles"?
      1. Alexey RA 28 October 2015 18: 04 New
        • 17
        • 0
        +17
        Quote: Temples
        "Olans" or is it "Eagles"?

        The Olandi. smile
        1. Vend 28 October 2015 18: 20 New
          • 19
          • 0
          +19
          Yes, that UAV in Armenia. Here is Serbia issued.
          “The governments of Serbia and Russia are preparing an unprecedented in terms of size and content, the Vzglyad portal reports. If the document is signed, it will actually mean blocking Belgrade’s entry into NATO and a new strengthening of Moscow’s position in the Balkans.

          The contract brought to the Russian Federation by the Prime Minister of Serbia Alexander Vučić implies a total rearmament of the army of the Balkan state to Russian standards. And this automatically means a rejection of NATO standards and a cross on the entry of Belgrade into the North Atlantic Alliance.

          So, the Nora Serbian self-propelled howitzers are supposed to be equipped with wheelsets from KamAZ, and the Russian 2-mm 30A2 guns are to be put on the Lazar-42 BRDM platforms. However, this is not the main thing in comparison with Belgrade’s plans to acquire a missile defense system that would protect the country from low-flying missiles. In fact, the Serbs intend to take care of their defense against NATO, since their traditional opponents - neighbors who split from Yugoslavia - do not possess such missiles.

          Also, the Serbian army wants to get Russian transport and attack helicopters.

          "The total amount of the proposed contract is difficult to calculate, but tentatively it can fluctuate around 5 billion euros - the amount is unthinkable for the Balkan countries. Against this background, any energy and innovation projects fade, even if it is assumed that the contract will be based on a long-term lending system," writes "Sight".

          http://x-true.info/27271-belgrad-nash-rf-i-serbiya-gotovyat-besprecedentnoe-voen
          noe-soglashenie.html
          1. Throw 28 October 2015 18: 33 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            "Olans" or is it "Eagles"?

            The Olandi. smile


            Yes, unmanned, headless and spineless laughing
          2. theadenter 28 October 2015 20: 57 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Well, waiting for the news.
          3. Aleksandr2012 28 October 2015 22: 41 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And at whose expense? Serbs are not very rich.
        2. Oman 47 28 October 2015 22: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Holland - this is what floats on top in the form of a heap, does not sink and stinks disgustingly ... hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. gjv
      gjv 28 October 2015 18: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Vladimir
      I am wary of drums ...

      Well, one should not only be wary of adversaries, but also be armed.
      But unfortunately there are none of them yet. Only demo samples.
  2. MIKHAN 28 October 2015 17: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And why are they ....))) I’m all silent! hi
    1. Alexey RA 28 October 2015 18: 06 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      And why are they ....)))

      How for what? To the Turkish army in the eastern regions was not offensive. And then the Western grouping at the borders with Syria is removed, but they are not. smile
    2. venaya 28 October 2015 18: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: MIKHAN
      And why are they ....

      For what? 5 kilometers high, this is not khukh-mukhra!
      Their cost itself is ridiculous, and the effect of them is sufficient, now everything will be in full view. Mount Ararat in height is commensurate with the height of the drone, what you need. So now it’s easier to get rid of any unpleasant surprises. Good luck with successful intelligence.
      1. Rus2012 28 October 2015 18: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: venaya
        The cost itself is ridiculous

        ... they say somewhere 18 million rubles. This is the whole complex: aircraft, starting equipment, control and maintenance kit.
        1. venaya 28 October 2015 19: 25 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Rus2012
          ... they say somewhere 18 million rubles. This is the whole complex: aircraft, starting equipment, control and maintenance kit.

          And now we’ll try to develop the idea and calculate the overall economic efficiency, so to speak, the debit is the loan: how many expenses would be needed to solve the same problem by other means. After which we will be able to determine the overall economic component of the effectiveness of their application.
          1. sa-ag 29 October 2015 07: 21 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: venaya
            And now we’ll try to develop the idea and calculate the overall economic efficiency, so to speak, the debit is the loan: how many expenses would be needed to solve the same problem by other means.

            an interesting question is, the glider is inexpensive, then the engine, I’ll assume that Rotax, it means that from 5000 euros it should be considered, then what kind of electronics is there, nothing is known here, if the array is from Samsung cameras, as there was once a photo, then this is just a couple more bucks, if something else, then the price is different, the range of up to 600 km implies either a satellite station or HF control, well, in principle, the cost of the car that carries it, the catapult, a possible rollback is added
  3. roskot 28 October 2015 18: 03 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In the mountains, an indispensable thing.
    In the Caucasus, one must look in both eyes.
    1. Oman 47 28 October 2015 23: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      From our base in Gyumri (formerly Leninakan) to Azerbaijan - as to China ... on foot. belay
      It happened to be in those parts on official business (p / o Akhuryan), even before the earthquake in 1989. soldier
  4. dchegrinec 28 October 2015 18: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Azerbaijanis are like Mowgli, they are constantly drawn to the wrong place! Behind them eye and eye!
  5. samara-58 28 October 2015 18: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Look eagles, look ...
  6. Bthuk 28 October 2015 19: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Our eagle all in the throat!)))
  7. Corsair 28 October 2015 19: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I wonder why with the old time-tested gliders of yaks and twins (or even the Lavochkin), shock UAVs do not, there are no engines that are good and economical, or plastic with aluminum, after all, plywood?
    Indeed, judging by Orlan, everything is in order with the remote control. No money or no desire to create competitors for manned aircraft and helicopters?
    1. AlNikolaich 28 October 2015 19: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Corsair
      I wonder why with the old time-tested gliders of yaks and twins (or even the Lavochkin), shock UAVs do not, there are no engines that are good and economical, or plastic with aluminum, after all, plywood?
      Indeed, judging by Orlan, everything is in order with the remote control. No money or no desire to create competitors for manned aircraft and helicopters?

      Apparently there is a different reason ... more precisely, nothing was invented by a person. Apparently therefore the main
      reliance on manned strike aircraft. And our hospitals and weddings do not need to bombard ...
      1. Corsair 29 October 2015 10: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: AlNikolaich
        Apparently there is a different reason ... more precisely, nothing was invented by a person.

        what Do you think a pilot of an attack aircraft or a bomber can better see the target? laughing You understand that they do not bomb 100-200 meters, and you won’t let a rocket from 100-200 meters - you can get under the blast wave and fragments. In addition, the UAV requires much less money for operation and maintenance, and the cost of mass production is several times less than a full-fledged aircraft; in addition, it is not necessary to create a complex life support system for the pilot.
        The future is for UAVs - and the only difficulties so far are quality, range and possible signal loss, here, artificial intelligence must either return the UAV to the base along a previously done route or perform the task offline.
        And the tool against them is the advanced electronic warfare systems of a potential adversary.
  8. Boricello 28 October 2015 19: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Is this the same eagle that was found in Turkey? In my opinion wink
    1. question 28 October 2015 21: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The size just let us down
    2. Abbra 28 October 2015 21: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      They shot down a quadrocopter of the smoked hash of the local padishah ...
    3. IAlex 29 October 2015 00: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There, the front confuser is on top, and the screw on the bottom ...
  9. Mjohn 28 October 2015 20: 44 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    This is to ensure that Turkish helicopters do not violate the state border of Armenia
  10. IAlex 29 October 2015 00: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is a pity he does not have pendants for two missiles: (((
    1. EGOrkka 29 October 2015 03: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      IAlex
      It is a pity he has no pendants for two rockets


      ... and that's another story ... wink
  11. Dimon19661 29 October 2015 06: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Still lagging behind in this direction from the mattress-last century for them ((((
  12. Sorokin 29 October 2015 06: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And yet progress on face (s)! We really neigh in 2006 when we bought Israeli airships in our Perm police department. And as in the fall, they fell into frosts. Such cars would not hurt then.