Military Review

Isaykin: negotiations with Iran on the supply of C-300 are close to completion

45
The Iranian government will withdraw a lawsuit to the Russian Federation for $ 4 billion, C-300 systems will be delivered to Tehran at the conclusion of commercial negotiations, reports Expert Online statement by the head of Rosoboronexport, Anatoly Isaikin.


Isaykin: negotiations with Iran on the supply of C-300 are close to completion


“There is an agreement with the Iranian side to withdraw the lawsuit,” Isaikin told reporters.

“The execution of the C-300 contract for Iran has been suspended; instructions were given to resume work, and we, as performers, are doing it, but a lot of time has passed, the C-300 system has changed, we are working on improving it. Commercial negotiations are underway, they are close to completion. ”- he said.

The publication reminds that the contract between the countries on the supply of C-300 systems was concluded in 2007. However, Russia suspended its implementation in connection with the adoption of UN Security Council resolution 1929, which introduced sanctions against Iran. In response, Iran sent a lawsuit to the International Court of Justice, demanding to recover $ 4 billion from the Russian Federation.
Photos used:
inosmi.ru/world/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sasha52ru
    sasha52ru 28 October 2015 15: 55 New
    +13
    Debts must be paid, especially if the people you owe are still useful to you .......
    1. Vyacheslav 64
      Vyacheslav 64 28 October 2015 15: 58 New
      +23
      Our complexes will be very useful to the Persians, but now we really need money, a mutually beneficial commodity-money exchange.
      1. Simon
        Simon 28 October 2015 16: 08 New
        +8
        This is good; rather, it would be necessary to deliver S-300 to Iran, otherwise the Americans want to make a no-fly zone over Syria. When Iran has these complexes, the Americans in this case will think that they will not be greeted over Syria.
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 28 October 2015 16: 32 New
          +10
          But look: Iran seems to be friends, and when
          Russia suspended its implementation in connection with the adoption of UN Security Council resolution 1929,
          - Clap - SUIT for 4 lard! I do not argue, fine!
          BUT!
          I wish we had worked for the absolutely foes of the NATO-French on the Mistrals!
          1. _Vladislav_
            _Vladislav_ 28 October 2015 16: 37 New
            +9
            Quote: Baikonur
            This is good; rather, it would be necessary to deliver S-300 to Iran, otherwise the Americans want to make a no-fly zone over Syria. When Iran has these complexes, the Americans in this case will think that they will not be greeted over Syria.

            Any air defense has a crack. In this case, we are talking about the supply of S-300 air defense systems to Iran, the purpose of which is to complicate the task for Israel in the event of an armed conflict. But there is one BUT, Israel has nuclear weapons. There is no exact certainty that it will be applied, but it is also impossible to say that Israel is embarrassed to use a variety of tools in military conflicts. In addition, both of them threatened to wipe each other off the face of the earth.

            As for the S-300 and how is success achieved in overcoming such an air defense. It is clear that more than one modern aircraft is not able to overcome the layered air defense of this type, and accordingly perform the task without consequences.

            To do this, first, use the CR (well, let's say Tomahawk), even if the missile is intercepted by the S-300 air defense system, then anyway, the missile has already left, it left the TPK. As soon as all S-300 calculations work out all the ammunition, a massive airstrike follows. There is not enough time to recharge.

            P.E.
            The moral of this fable is that there are no impregnable fortresses, there is a limited set of tools. If we talk about the United States, they do not lack such tools.
            1. Das Boot
              Das Boot 28 October 2015 18: 33 New
              +1
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              P.E.
              The moral of this story is

              I liked the comment. I’ll go down the branch and learn about “irresistibility”, “all-weather”, “all-encompassing” and other things “already-copied-Bavar-373”.
            2. Karlovar
              Karlovar 28 October 2015 20: 24 New
              +1
              There is a small nuance .... In the event of a massive attack of thousands of Tomahawks (subsonic), hundreds of supersonic cruise missiles with nuclear equipment to Europe and dozens of ballistic missiles across the ocean, of course, also with nuclear warheads, will fly back (almost simultaneously) ... And then there is no need or opportunity beyond the Tomahawks to fly NATO aviation .... This is the principle of vigorous deterrence !!!!!!!! Conclusion: nuclear bombs and their means of delivery = an instrument of guaranteed peace (guaranteed retaliation) !!!! Hence attempts on the PRO missile defense leveling program !!!!
              1. mad
                mad 28 October 2015 23: 14 New
                +1
                Quote: Karlovar
                Hundreds of nuclear-powered supersonic cruise missiles fly to Europe and dozens of ballistic missiles across the ocean, of course, also with nuclear warheads.

                Are you talking about Iran now ????
            3. beitar
              beitar 28 October 2015 20: 58 New
              -10
              Any air defense has a crack. In this case, we are talking about the supply of S-300 air defense systems to Iran, the purpose of which is to complicate the task for Israel in the event of an armed conflict. But there is one BUT, Israel has nuclear weapons. There is no exact certainty that it will be applied, but it is also impossible to say that Israel is embarrassed to use a variety of tools in military conflicts. In addition, both of them threatened to wipe each other off the face of the earth.

              . [/ Quote]


              Israel has never threatened to destroy Iran. Israel has always stressed that it will not allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons. It will turn out diplomatically, wonderful. It will not work out diplomatically, it will have to be prevented by military means, and the S-300 will not help Iran protect nuclear facilities.
              1. Talgat
                Talgat 28 October 2015 21: 43 New
                +2
                yes - Israel does not threaten the destruction of Iran

                but in fact it supports the west and is the enemy of Iran No. 1

                And to all of us, Iran is super important - this is our fence from the United States - Iran closes the Caspian. There will be no Iran and the enemy will come right to our doorstep

                There is no choice - it is necessary to support Iran, which both Russia and Kazakhstan are doing. And s-400 must be set there and Sushki and 30 and 35 are already needed there. But the spirit of the Iranian people and the determination of their leadership — thank goodness they are great — are more important than the S-400 and Sushka — the traditions of Ahmadinejad are fully implemented and the Ayatollahs clearly understand who their enemy is and who is friend

                if the enemy comes to Iran, then it is necessary to fight there in Iran - since there is a treaty by which Russia can send troops there at any moment - and Iran saves this treaty. One hundred percent in this case, all the CSTO will be there, it will not be any jokes - the war is at the doorstep and friends will need to be rescued "in full." Obviously, in this case, China will also help

                So far, it is necessary to stop the enemy at distant frontiers - in Syria, it is good that Russia understands this and acts
              2. WedVolga
                WedVolga 28 October 2015 23: 32 New
                +1
                "Israel has always stressed that it will not allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons." But that Israel imagines itself to be the arbiter of destinies in the Middle East, and perhaps all over the world? Nuclear weapons will not help Jews, or if they use them, then only Jericho pipes will remain there.
          2. cyberhanter
            cyberhanter 28 October 2015 20: 13 New
            0
            The French are apparently better than us contracts
    2. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 28 October 2015 15: 59 New
      +7
      C-300 is already outdated in principle ....
      We’ll put a serious air defense there (layered)! So that not a single "bastard" flew .. Here are comrades from Israel from us.))) bully
      1. DenZ
        DenZ 28 October 2015 16: 03 New
        +6
        In principle, it all depends on the modification. The same is the same-discord.
        1. Throw
          Throw 28 October 2015 17: 35 New
          +1
          MIKHAN

          C-300 is already outdated in principle ....


          Really?

          And what existing goals from the Kyrgyz Republic to warheads can they not shoot down?
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Simon
        Simon 28 October 2015 16: 10 New
        +1
        Everything old is being modernized. The Americans still have no means of fighting against the S-300.
        1. Your friend
          Your friend 28 October 2015 16: 21 New
          +1
          Quote: Simon
          Everything old is being modernized. The Americans still have no means of fighting against the S-300.

          How do you know? Were the collisions of the S-300 and American aircraft?
        2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 28 October 2015 16: 40 New
          +10
          The S-300 is an excellent complex, but this is by no means a child prodigy; it, like any other air defense system, can be suppressed and destroyed. Difficult, but possible.
          Therefore, the air defense system of the Russian Federation should harmoniously combine air defense systems, fighters, ground-based radars and electronic warfare systems, radio-electronic reconnaissance stations, air-launched airborne warning systems and so on and so on ... What, in general, is the Russian Federation now
        3. beitar
          beitar 28 October 2015 21: 00 New
          -2
          Quote: Simon
          Everything old is being modernized. The Americans still have no means of fighting against the S-300.



          Do you really think so ? Do you think that the F-22 and B-2 along with electronic warfare systems and drones will not cope with the S-300?
          1. dvina71
            dvina71 29 October 2015 02: 09 New
            +1
            Quote: beitar

            Do you really think so ? Do you think that the F-22 and B-2 along with electronic warfare systems and drones will not cope with the S-300?


            Iran has 1L222 .. what you listed is their feed .. Next, an air defense calculation is given on the fiber optic cable, the backlight radar is turned on for a short time and the rocket leaves .. F22 and B2 can pass only in complete silence mode .. Can they?
          2. bogdan4ik
            bogdan4ik 29 October 2015 15: 00 New
            0
            They won’t do it. There is not enough power. EW salting on electricity. There are many on earth, very few in the sky. No airborne electronic warfare will suppress the tracking and guidance station S-300. Do Americans have nuclear reactors on planes, and locators and equipment of the required power and size on airships are next :-)
      4. remy
        remy 28 October 2015 16: 50 New
        +2
        SAM S-300 (P / V) for a long time does not become obsolete.
        RAS-3 to S-300 does not even reach, neither in height, nor in range, nor in the complexity of the targets
        1. beitar
          beitar 28 October 2015 22: 53 New
          -4
          The only difference is that the Patriot has shot down missiles and planes on his account (the last case is the Syrian SU-24, shot down by PAC-2 over Israel a year ago). And in favor of the S-300 manufacturer specifications. Even Putin did not call the S-300 the best complex, but "one of the best systems in the world." Because as a sensible person and not uryaidiot, unlike many of the local forum users.
          1. dvina71
            dvina71 29 October 2015 02: 13 New
            +2
            Quote: beitar
            The only difference is that the Patriot has missiles and planes on his account (the last case is the Syrian SU-24, the downed RAS-2 over Israel a year ago)

            Shoot down a lost plane, obviously not on a combat mission .. not much honor. In the Donbass landed all aviation dill, without a patriot .. MANPADS the coolest air defense?

            And now. Great-grandfather S-300 shot down an American reconnaissance plane that was carrying out a combat mission, from your grandfather you got it, and from your father in Yugoslavia. Please note that in all cases, planes performing a combat mission were shot down .. Do you think the great-granddaughter will let us down?
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. Bongo
        Bongo 29 October 2015 06: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: MIKHAN
        C-300 is already outdated in principle ....

        Such komenti touch me ... lol Dear Vitaly, is it possible to elaborate on which modification of C-300 you are talking about and with which SD?
    3. Your friend
      Your friend 28 October 2015 16: 00 New
      +15
      Quote: sasha52ru
      Debts must be paid, especially if the people you owe are still useful to you .......

      One id ... from blocking a deal that would bring money to the budget, work for people. And he is still the prime minister of our country (((
      1. Karlovar
        Karlovar 28 October 2015 20: 39 New
        +2
        This one, I think, fulfills the joint, and they use it blindly, even blindly used it .... In any case, as prime minister, Medvedev is preferable to figures such as the redhead, Kudrin, the enemies who have nothing to lose (since they have been in the service of the State Department for a long time but failed to put Russia on the instructions of the owner on the shoulder blades, on his knees, yes, but not on the shoulder blades, that is, they work poorly for the owner, they can fire him ...) Medvedev has no such aggravating circumstances, and he’s cowardly by nature, the most optimal option that does not betray ... out of fear ..... Fear is the surest way to keep a person under control, or rather than money ....
      2. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 28 October 2015 21: 39 New
        0
        [quote = Your friend] And he is still the prime minister of our country
        He is now also awarded for the “achievements” unknown to me! He made so many nasty things for the country and so many nonsense that we still disentangle! Why he is still the prime minister, and not the minimum sent no closer than 100 kilometers from the government (and the maximum convicted) - I do not understand! What does Putin like so much about? I don’t understand either. What a slow-witted I became!
        1. Xsanchez
          Xsanchez 28 October 2015 23: 35 New
          0
          They started together in Leningrad: from there they leave traces.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 28 October 2015 16: 05 New
      +15
      Quote: sasha52ru
      Debts must be paid, especially if the people you owe are still useful to you .......

      For this, we can say thanks to the iPhone carrier, who, when he was president, stopped the deal to please the mattresses.
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 28 October 2015 17: 16 New
        +3
        Quote: vovanpain
        For this, we can say thanks to the iPhone carrier, who, when he was president, stopped the deal to please the mattresses.

        I would have much to the Nano-President with the iPhone for which "thank you" said ... I could not, damn it, sit quietly and do nothing!

        Remember the joke: “The cosmonaut of Chukchi! - Woof-woof! - Why are you barking? Feed the dogs and don’t touch anything ...” And here - I would warm the stool and touch nothing. No, I also managed to "steer" ...

        Every summer at the dacha, when it gets light at 3 at midnight, I remember him. Naturally, so that decent people usually wake up from this. Komsomol functionaries do not wake up, they have a good sleep ...
      2. veksha50
        veksha50 28 October 2015 17: 33 New
        +5
        Quote: vovanpain
        Thank you for the iPhonewho, when he was president, stopped the deal to please mattresses.


        Hmm ... I "love" Medvedev so much that I just can’t eat ...

        However, behind the supposedly "president Medvedev" who was the prime minister ??? Or vice versa, I don’t remember ...

        It would be more honest to say that we, Russia, crap one's pants with Iran with these S-300s ... And now we could get instead of an alliance in the fight against IS - well, if not an enemy, but not an ally ... there would be no salvo of calibers, nor much else ...

        I tried to show independence ... But it turned out - according to Chernomyrdin ... I wanted to fart, but I put it in my pants ...
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 28 October 2015 18: 17 New
          +10
          Quote: veksha50
          I tried to show independence ... But it turned out - according to Chernomyrdin ... I wanted to fart, but I put it in my pants ...

          If you recall the iPhone presidency, then before the United Nations voted to establish a no-fly zone in Libya, the bear gave Churkin a command to abstain rather than veto, the mattresses smashed Libya, burned the whole Middle East, someone managed like Egypt, Syria and Yemen are still blazing, in Libya Islamic anarchy, please play along with the American “partners” After that vote, Medved and Putin spoke on TV, I thought the iPhone would get into the melon right in front of the screen, but now it’s not.
          1. Karlovar
            Karlovar 28 October 2015 20: 47 New
            +1
            I think no one doubts who was the real ruler under the presidency of Medvedev .....
          2. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 30 October 2015 04: 40 New
            +1
            Quote: vovanpain
            After that vote, Medved and Putin spoke on TV, I thought the iPhone would get a melon right in front of the screen, but no premiere now.
            The Nano-President takes precedence because under the manual control of the state, the post of head of the cabinet becomes purely nominal. So he is "sitting" on a chair so as not to take up anyone's place. And so - like there is a fake, but it doesn’t bother anyone. He sits to himself, playing an iPhone ...
        2. Karlovar
          Karlovar 28 October 2015 20: 45 New
          +1
          I think this "cant" of Medvedev was objectively inevitable ... due to a bunch of geopolitical reasons ..., conspiracy, non-protrusion ahead of time, etc ... Roughly speaking, it was necessary .....
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 28 October 2015 17: 21 New
      +1
      In principle, the news is very positive! Iran and I seem to be half-allies.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. kodxnumx
      kodxnumx 28 October 2015 17: 35 New
      +1
      For a long time it was necessary to put this system, we are not a cook, then I’m France!
    8. Asadullah
      Asadullah 28 October 2015 17: 39 New
      +2
      Debts must be paid, especially if the people you owe are still useful to you .......


      Alas, Iran could have claims to the Russian Federation much more than air defense systems. He was a bargaining chip in all negotiations with the Americans, from the WTO to the latest sanctions. Who will like it when you are being traded? Will the Russian leadership have enough intelligence and foresight to purposefully build the Russia-Iran-Pakistan-China axis?
      1. Karlovar
        Karlovar 28 October 2015 20: 49 New
        0
        I support !!! + India, it’s desirable, but somehow there’s a bit unclear ... for now .. but I hope ...
  2. venaya
    venaya 28 October 2015 15: 58 New
    +5
    recover $ 4 billion from the Russian Federation

    I must say that this is not a small amount of money. It’s better not to have such difficulties and problems, it’s unprofitable.
  3. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 28 October 2015 15: 58 New
    +2
    I think in this thread there will be many nicknames with the Israeli flag. The theme for them is as acute as the Golan.
    Ah, yes, I must say something essentially. If earlier I was sure that Iran needed to put the S-300, now I doubt it. I can’t explain why. I think that such a supply will greatly change the situation in the region, and it is already unstable. I would first kick out any American leeches that only fan the coals, and then see what and how.
  4. pasha88tt
    pasha88tt 28 October 2015 16: 05 New
    +6
    Iran is looking for insurance and a reliable partner. We need help, if only from the fact that we do not need another hotbed of tension. And at the expense of modification, they were recently promised a modernized one.
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 28 October 2015 16: 52 New
      +1
      Yes, really added! Last time I looked through it for a long time, so there were 26, already 34 and more than once. BACKS - EVIL !!!
  5. mihasik
    mihasik 28 October 2015 16: 07 New
    +3
    However, Russia suspended its implementation in connection with the adoption of UN Security Council resolution 1929, which introduced sanctions against Iran. In response, Iran filed a lawsuit with the International Court of Justice, demanding to recover $ 4 billion from the Russian Federation.

    And he did it right, because the supply of S-300 defense systems did not fall under UN sanctions.
    And personal sanctions against Iran were introduced by Mr. Medvedev, being at that time the President of the Russian Federation, for some reason the author of the article modestly kept silent. And now all this "hemorrhoids" under this contract, we have precisely because of this person.
    Maybe again, the arrows on the clocks across the country can be transferred back and forth, you see, and the problems of the country themselves will somehow resolve) ..
  6. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 28 October 2015 16: 18 New
    +1
    Our answer to Erdogan. Hello to Israel.
  7. roskot
    roskot 28 October 2015 16: 18 New
    +2
    It’s good that they resolved. The agreement was - give the goods back. Did not give the goods, give money for the goods. All in fairness.
  8. gloomy fox
    gloomy fox 28 October 2015 16: 36 New
    +1
    agreement More expensive than money, all the more it threatened Isku with 4 billion bucks. and allies are needed next to Syrae. Interestingly. But will the Yankees risk experiencing complexes, is there probably not enough courage?
  9. NDR-791
    NDR-791 28 October 2015 16: 47 New
    +2
    But nothing that sanctions against Iran were introduced for a very long time before the 2007 year? A simple commercial dispute. Well, albeit not easy !!! Like our Mistral !!! BUT! Decided, razrulili, and not bowing towards Babamka like Hollande!
  10. Coconut
    Coconut 28 October 2015 16: 54 New
    +3
    Quote: pasha88tt
    Iran is looking for insurance and a reliable partner. We need help, if only from the fact that we do not need another hotbed of tension. And at the expense of modification, they were recently promised a modernized one.


    It’s not necessary to help, but it is NECESSARY .. although it would be necessary to save the political face .. it’s no secret that we threw Iran the last time Medvedev did this with the S-2 ... otherwise they won’t believe us
  11. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 28 October 2015 18: 09 New
    +2
    However, Russia suspended its implementation in connection with the adoption of UN Security Council resolution 1929, which introduced sanctions against Iran.


    The S-300 complex did not fall under the requirements of a UN resolution, the decision to suspend the delivery was made by DAMA, and what it was guided by until now has not really been voiced, they’re just messing up nonsense.

    Something like that, colleagues. hi
    1. Your friend
      Your friend 28 October 2015 18: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      However, Russia suspended its implementation in connection with the adoption of UN Security Council resolution 1929, which introduced sanctions against Iran.


      The S-300 complex did not fall under the requirements of a UN resolution, the decision to suspend the delivery was made by DAMA, and what it was guided by until now has not really been voiced, they’re just messing up nonsense.

      Something like that, colleagues. hi

      What was guided by? They gave him an iPhone, isn’t that enough. Now, if you were given an iPhone, wouldn't you do that?
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 28 October 2015 18: 57 New
        +1
        In general, Iran will be supplied with modernized S-300 air defense systems and they are now in dire need of it in the light of its assistance to both Syria and the Hussites in Yemen, because those countries that support terrorism and various militants represented by the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc. may strike Iran.
        Isaikin: Russia is working on improving the S-300 for Iran
        Rosoboronexport is working on improving Russian S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems for Iran, said Anatoly Isaykin, head of the company, on Tuesday.
        "The implementation of the S-300 contract for Iran was suspended; instructions were given to resume work, and we, as performers, are doing it, but a lot of time has passed, the S-300 system has changed, we are working on improving its system," he told reporters.
        http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20151027/1308837099.html


        Visit of Iranian ships to Astrakhan on October 21, 2015. By the way, this is the second in the last six months, they say joint naval exercises are planned.
        According to media reports, today on October 21, in the morning, Iranian missile boats Joshan and Paykan of the Sina project arrived in Astrakhan. The light frigate Damavand of the Mowj project (the largest Iranian warship in the Caspian Sea, admitted to the Navy in the spring of this year) remained at the entrance to the Volga-Caspian shipping channel, because it did not pass through the draft due to the low water level in the Volga .
        mp-navigator.livejournal.com/
  12. Locksmith
    Locksmith 28 October 2015 19: 51 New
    +1
    Quote: _Vladislav_
    As soon as all S-300 calculations work out all the ammunition, a massive airstrike follows. There is not enough time to recharge.

    Why? The structure has a technical division and it continuously pulls up "shells", and launchers change in a couple of minutes wink
  13. Markiz_A
    Markiz_A 28 October 2015 20: 23 New
    0
    The S-300 complexes did not fall under the UN Security Council resolution - it was Medvedev who caved in under the Americans.
    And about the supplies, it’s not entirely clear why Iran needs the S-300, because they announced and even showed their own copy of the S-300.
  14. afrikanez
    afrikanez 28 October 2015 21: 13 New
    +1
    Medvedev listened to the sanctioners and, as a result, Russia received a lawsuit of 4 billion. So, Iran is essentially right in everything. And we do not need to pull the rubber with the C300
  15. Barakuda
    Barakuda 28 October 2015 21: 40 New
    -2
    And again, and again, intentions for productivity and planned cooperation. Partnership for Peace WHICH YEAR. Prospects for investments, modernization-mediation-Skolkovo.
    No, everything is GOOD, in terms of the percentage, that they have now stolen less than a year ago.
    YES HOW MUCH CAN YOU FEED THE NICE? what Give them meat in order to distract from events. UR, BIRTH.
  16. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 28 October 2015 23: 30 New
    0
    Four divisions of “weather” will not do, they will only beat off the desire of the “partners” of Iran to “joke”. A serious defense defense requires dozens, if not hundreds, of divisions and not only S-300, but also medium and short range, as well as a serious radar field of two, three fold overlap in several ranges.
  17. mamont5
    mamont5 29 October 2015 06: 41 New
    0
    Quote: sasha52ru
    Debts must be paid, especially if the people you owe are still useful to you .......

    And for a long time it was necessary to put it (perhaps soon it will be necessary to start up the matter), and they all agree.