Media: military reform brought Russia new power

55
New features of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are worrying American generals, the article says in the pages of Der Spiegel magazine.



"Russia inflicts airstrikes in Syria, raises strategic bombers into the air, once every few weeks conducts sudden checks of combat readiness, and the US is now sounding the alarm," leads RIA News excerpt from the publication.

According to the commander of the US forces in Europe, Ben Hodges, "of particular concern to Russian systems that allow you to block access to a technologically superior enemy to strategically important objects." In particular, he noted the anti-ship missile systems and air defense systems.

“In the event of a conflict, Russia may create zones inaccessible to NATO forces — for example, the Russian Bastion complexes are capable of sinking alliance ships soon after passing through the Bosporus,” the general said.

“In recent years, Russia has radically modernized its armed forces — it has been the most radical military reform since the late 19th century,” said Vasily Kashin, an expert at the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST). “By the 2020, the arming of the ground forces of the Russian army is planned to be updated by 70%, at the moment this figure is about 30%.”

According to him, “the Russian army has probably become stronger than all the EU armies combined.” However, "Russia is still hard to compete with the United States, so it pays special attention to nuclear deterrence forces, the modernization of which is proceeding at a high rate," the expert added.

“Should NATO accept the fact that an equal rival appeared in the east? (...) And yes and no, Der Spiegel writes. “NATO believes that the position of the countries neighboring Russia is risky.”

Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”
  • RIA News. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    28 October 2015 11: 09
    Experience, as they say, you won’t drink. Do not have military experience, nor what modern weapons will help. Therefore, NATO generals should not be surprised at the effectiveness of the Russian Army. We are not surprised, we are just proud. good
    We already know what, how much and how.
    1. +32
      28 October 2015 11: 17
      Quote: Andrea
      You will not drink experience, as they say. Do not have military experience with us, nor any modern weapons will help.

      We need both experience and modern weapons and the ability to use it, and Washington, with its vassals, let them howl further. These toys are sleeping, but God forbid, they wake up.
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 12: 50
        Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”

        Are the Lithuanians themselves ready to defend the EU?
        Fall to the death of the brave in the interests of the EU!
        Or should everyone just owe them?

        “In recent years, Russia has radically modernized its armed forces - it was the most radical military reform since the end of the XNUMXth century

        Kudrin, how are you doing there?
        Still calling for cuts in military spending?
        It is necessary to poke such "figures" with a muzzle.
        Until now, after all, "consults" the government.
        Vrazhina.
      2. +5
        28 October 2015 15: 16
        NATO believes that the situation of neighboring countries with Russia is risky. ”
    2. +8
      28 October 2015 11: 25
      Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”
      Right now! Americans and Europeans are sleeping and see kmk to protect Lithuania. Where without it? .. a very, very necessary country for them ... strategically important ... laughing
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 45
        They say the whole Baltic region is a reliable supplier of plumbers and nannies for London and Paris, who will change their taps if the "evil Russian" comes?
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 55
        There are also in Lithuania ..
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 11: 58
          It turns out that "to kick the impudent goats on the horns so that they do not climb into someone else's garden" in goat language sounds like "block the access of a technologically superior enemy to strategically important objects" laughing
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +1
        28 October 2015 13: 37
        Quote: marlin1203
        Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”
        Right now! Americans and Europeans are sleeping and see kmk to protect Lithuania. Where without it? .. a very, very necessary country for them ... strategically important ... laughing


        This is their auto-training such, they produce their own significance! Lithuania has the best defense against Russia in the world! Russia fucking does not need it! They will ask, take the hell!
      5. 0
        28 October 2015 14: 08
        Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia are three purulent acne on the ass of Europe, which they do not need at all, but stink in the direction of Russia from them in abundance, because they suffer.
    3. +2
      28 October 2015 11: 28
      We must know that our allies are ready to protect us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”
      Pleased with this Borzysh, you fight there for us, and we'll see who to join later laughing
    4. +1
      28 October 2015 11: 54
      According to the commander of the US forces in Europe, Ben Hodges, "of particular concern to Russian systems that allow you to block access to a technologically superior enemy to strategically important objects." In particular, he noted the anti-ship missile systems and air defense systems.

      If they allow blocking, then they themselves are technologically superior.
    5. 0
      28 October 2015 13: 41
      Yes, you won’t drink the experience, but there were attempts, under Yeltsin, when he almost drank all of Russia with the defense industry together. And how cute and good we were for Uncle Sam and the whole of Europe then, when they indulgently patted Tsar Boris on the shoulder for the destruction strategic aircraft carriers.
      BZHRK and nuclear submarine. And now Borins lackeys, Kasyanovs, stankevichs, Nadezhdins and other frost, continue his "business" ... And for some reason no one noticed, except for Russia,
      how the USA destroyed Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and then woke up, like a starving pack of dogs, when Russia came to the aid of Syria, a tantrum with verbal diarrhea began ... But, as the ancients said, you are not here, Russia rose from its knees with the Army, and the fight will be long.
  2. +12
    28 October 2015 11: 09
    All this is heard, heard, read, reread. No need to pay attention to the howls of the Pentagon generals and the media that they are crushing. There is still work to do. A mountain of problems in the Defense Ministry and the troops. Especially in the military-industrial complex.
    The dog barks the caravan goes.
    1. +6
      28 October 2015 11: 13
      Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins recently said: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to protect us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”

      HA HA HA, is it for you Pindocs will die? Only for the loot! And you are just laying.
      1. +4
        28 October 2015 11: 22
        Quote: figvam
        Only for the loot!

        They are not going to die for the loot! Amers have too good a life!
    2. 0
      28 October 2015 11: 14
      Quote: Vladimir
      heard heard heard read

      Nothing wrong! Of course, you should not calm down, but you also need to confirm that everything is not so bad with us!
  3. +8
    28 October 2015 11: 09
    If the US is sounding the alarm, then Russia is on the right track
  4. +6
    28 October 2015 11: 09
    Stop asking for money, it won’t help.
  5. +3
    28 October 2015 11: 11
    How tired they are! That is why for some reason my neighbors absolutely did not care when I acquired civilian weapons. I wish there was rzhaka if they entered the arms race with me, so for parity laughing
    PS Comrades Lithuanians! Do not hope that no one will fight for you, they will not, they will give it back and will be glad that they have not been touched. An example before our eyes: for the Crimea, many fought ..? tongue Earlier examples, I will not excel, because you have your own alternative story there today ... laughing
    1. -1
      28 October 2015 11: 17
      Quote: Observer 33
      I wish there was rzhaka if they entered the arms race with me, so for parity

      Your neighbors are not your potential opponents (hopefully)! smile
    2. +1
      28 October 2015 11: 42
      I wish there was rzhaka if they entered the arms race with me, so for parity


      Your neighbors have their own NATO. The police and the team from the psychiatric hospital will come. You, most importantly, give a reason. Well, he drank there, ate a bite and went out to steer over the crows. tongue

      And "disarmament" and democracy will also come.

      And the deployment of NATO in the Baltic states is our serious loss. And even though you look through the glasses, even without them, this is a fact.
  6. +4
    28 October 2015 11: 12
    "Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins recently said:" We need a reliable deterrence. We need to know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. "
    They themselves do not even believe that NATO will harness because of them.
  7. +8
    28 October 2015 11: 12
    "... a technologically superior enemy ..."
    So it’s not so superior, if he is "blocked access" ?! Isn't it time to lower self-esteem and scratch the turnip ?!
  8. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 15
    Ndaaa ... we supposedly bark at Russia, and in case of a fight, if your neighbor gets angry, you have to clean his face, but at the same time do not forget and leave some money for utility bills and good food with good drinks.
    The psychology of a typical burrower.
  9. +2
    28 October 2015 11: 15
    Quote: Decathlon
    "... a technologically superior enemy ..."
    So it’s not so superior, if he is "blocked access" ?! Isn't it time to lower self-esteem and scratch the turnip ?!



    Cognition does not allow us, but for us ... to make us. wink
  10. +5
    28 October 2015 11: 22
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”
    But who needs cockroaches, but for them you are just consumables and land for bases
  11. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 23
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins recently said: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to protect us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”

    The question is why? What kind of fat do they have from this? Rather, some losses. laughing
  12. -1
    28 October 2015 11: 26
    According to him, “the Russian army has probably become stronger than all the EU armies combined”
    However, “it’s still difficult for Russia to compete with the United States,

    it’s already obvious that this is not a long time
  13. -1
    28 October 2015 11: 28
    This is just what the NATO countries will fight for the Baltic States in the last turn. In this regard, the leaders of these countries are fooling around thinking that they are full partners.
  14. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 29
    But in yesterday's news, Siluanov ached that at current oil prices, Russia in 2016 will spend the entire stabilization fund and the next 2017-2018. a big budget deficit will begin. As a result, in his opinion everything will be so bad that I don’t want to talk.

    The oligarchs probably too much too much, about this ...
  15. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 32
    Show NATO this photo !!!!

    All-Union parade of athletes on Red Square. 1937
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 12: 13
      Yeah. To guide our sofa dystrophics along Red Square. NATO will be "horrified". At that time, the people had a desire to be like that, and the state contributed to this.
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 13: 03
        Quote: Babr
        Nda. Our sofa dystrophics hold on Red Square.

        laughing It’s you in vain, some "couch dystrophies" will be wider across themselves (I’m not writing honestly about myself) An hour on all sorts of GMOs, Hamnoburgers and additives, people widen and swim only on the way.
        1. -1
          28 October 2015 13: 16
          Quote: Corsair
          You shouldn't have, some "sofa dystrophies" will be wider across themselves

          I came across this when the senior grandson went to school. Before that, he was a normal, agile boy. And then, by leaps and bounds, he began to grow fat. With difficulty he convinced his daughter-in-law that the reason was in all kinds of GMOs. Result. Everything fell into place.
          1. -1
            28 October 2015 16: 45
            Quote: Babr
            I came across this when the senior grandson went to school. Before that, he was a normal, agile boy. And then, by leaps and bounds, he began to grow fat. With difficulty he convinced his daughter-in-law that the reason was in all kinds of GMOs. Result. Everything fell into place.

            request Normal eating was not found, and even around aggressive advertising of any ram for children from the age of 3. I would forbid to advertise any junk food on TV until 21-22 hours and next to (not closer than 500 m) to build fast food cafes / restaurants (makhryaki, kfsniki, etc.) with schools and kindergartens.
  16. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 33
    Council to Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO
    -and don’t hope, it’s better to make friends with a neighbor and take away other people's warriors, then there will be peace in your country.
  17. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 36
    Poor, they do not understand that it is they who defend Europe with their dead bodies - for this they are kept in NATO, and not in order to defend them.
  18. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 36
    Russian complexes "Bastion" are able to sink the ships of the alliance soon after passing the Bosphorus "

    Why litter in your sea. We will find a place for you in the Atlantic with our "Bastion".
    But seriously, you should not flatter yourself. The work is endless.
  19. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 39
    There is nothing to be afraid of the USA and the West. The most powerful armed forces of Ukraine in the world and their commander in chief, that’s who is dangerous.
  20. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 41
    Quote: Mama_Cholli
    But in yesterday's news, Siluanov ached that at current oil prices, Russia in 2016 will spend the entire stabilization fund and the next 2017-2018. a big budget deficit will begin. As a result, in his opinion everything will be so bad that I don’t want to talk.

    The oligarchs probably too much too much, about this ...

    If these liberals: Siluanov, Nabiullina, Gref, Ulyukaev
    and "Aifonchik" with their ministers-thieves, will remain in their posts - SO THAT IS AND BE, "stopudovo do not go to grandma!"
  21. +1
    28 October 2015 11: 44
    The ambassador of Latvia said that he needed to be sure that his striped accomplice would keep the door of Russia while he put under it.
  22. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 45
    Berzins is a naive child. The Yankees are unlikely to protect them. - Not for that the Baltic "hot" guys were dragged into NATO and the EU. They will be forced to work out in blood, NATO membership, they will be set like dogs on a hunt on a Russian bear in order to wear it down and gain time. And what will happen to those mongrels, the Americans do not care.
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 11: 59
      What will they gain? An hour or two at best.
  23. +1
    28 October 2015 11: 50
    Someone will explain the meaning of this "analytical" material to me? requestPS I put a minus, the article is absolutely empty!
  24. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 59
    This is not the last butthirt of American "generals".
  25. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 01
    “Of particular concern are Russian systems that allow the technology superior enemy to block access to strategically important targets.”

    What unclouded IMPUDENCE! The ability of Russia DEFEND troubling! angry
  26. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 02
    Putin once said that it makes no sense to catch up. It makes sense to immediately get ahead!
    So it didn't make sense to build 12 instead of one aircraft carrier! It is easier to release one Borei-type boat, which will pull everyone to the bottom and one "Admiral Kuznetsov!"
  27. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 04
    I do not think that NATO allies will die for the Baltic deficits. The "leaders" of the Baltic countries also understand this.
  28. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 13
    Understand what they understand, but shit from them like from a skunk brigade.
  29. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 16
    "Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins recently said:" We need reliable containment. We need to know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us "" of what he represents, in the first minutes, the DB will be rolled out like "God flounder" and there will be no one to fight for and someone to protect
  30. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 17
    Impudent, however. They, you see, are worried by a gun in the hands of a man guarding his own garden. And your own ass, which can suffer in the case when you have to overcome the neighbor’s fence.
    But the situation itself, when they are impatient to spoil in a strange house, having previously broken into it, they do not bother even once. Impudent and scoundrels, what can I say ... am
  31. mihasik
    -1
    28 October 2015 12: 20
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”

    Who the hell needs them to fight for them. For "sixes" do not fight, it is a consumable. The Baltic Natsiks have not yet learned the common truths. True, they have always been slowed down - probably it has not yet reached them!)
  32. +3
    28 October 2015 12: 29
    Quote: Stiletto
    Impudent, however. They, you see, are worried by a gun in the hands of a man guarding his own garden. And your own ass, which can suffer in the case when you have to overcome the neighbor’s fence.
    But the situation itself, when they are impatient to spoil in a strange house, having previously broken into it, they do not bother even once. Impudent and scoundrels, what can I say ... am



    If they don’t speak about them, they will forget about it, plus the host will throw a bone for active barking, as well as NATO’s useless ambitions and buffer territories.
  33. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 45
    According to the commander of the US forces in Europe, Ben Hodges, "of particular concern to Russian systems that allow you to block access to a technologically superior enemy to strategically important objects." In particular, he noted the anti-ship missile systems and air defense systems.

    Judging by the publications on the site, poor Hodges, worried for the second month in a row, this is no longer normal and may contribute to the development of psychosis. This is me, dear colleagues, as a physician I say, I worked in the hospital as head of the personnel department for two years. Yes
  34. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 47
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”


    And here I have doubts. The fact is that no one uses sprats in America or Europe, except for the countries of the former USSR republics. What is the Allies to fight for? wassat
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 13: 39
      for not letting Russia into the Baltic states. Feel the difference and our threat to them if our ships stand in the Baltic ports.
      It is this role of "non-admission" that the Baltic states play in world geopolitics.
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 21: 10
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        for not letting Russia into the Baltic states.


        Dear Pravdorub, you do not want to see the irony in my comment. And believe me, except irony, nothing more. But apparently I already do not get the irony. sad
  35. 0
    28 October 2015 14: 34
    They got up only for 30, in the west "February" went in full swing, I look forward to an upgrade to 70 laughing
  36. +1
    28 October 2015 14: 57
    Very good news for both us and Western countries!)) Keep it up !!!
  37. 0
    28 October 2015 17: 40
    technologically superior adversary's access to strategically important facilities

    Even standing head over heels in shit, the Yankees remain highly regarded about themselves. It seems that in order to bring down this arrogance, they must be drowned in the same shit
  38. 0
    29 October 2015 00: 45
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins said recently: “We need reliable deterrence. We must know that our allies are ready to defend us and, if necessary, fight for us. ”

    Yes, who the fuck you need!
  39. 0
    29 October 2015 09: 09
    There is no need to talk excessively pathos about the successes of the RF Armed Forces in Syria, all the more, to connect this with a certain reform. We have never had any reforms. There were companies with the goal of destroying one or another key element of the Soviet state.
    Reforms always lead to IMPROVEMENT, and not to individual results.
    What we see is the ability to use modern weapons and the fact that the training system for professionals has not yet collapsed.
    But in general ..., the Russian army to the level of the Soviet, as to Mars, well, from strength, as to the Moon. Although, this is also not bad.
    Still, for so many years it has been ruined and cannot in any way be ruined.
    And, most importantly, a separate company is not a victory. Consider that now we see an analogue of the alpine hiking of Suvorov. There is a lot of effect and heroism, but the results .... ???
  40. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 41
    Lithuanian Ambassador to NATO Indulis Berzins

    "…ambassador Lithuania to NATO Indulis Berzins... "is something! .. A person with such a Latvian name and even more, a classically Latvian surname cannot represent Lithuania. On the contrary, one can still imagine, but Lithuania is one of the most mono-ethnic countries in Europe. If the author’s mistake is unprofessionalism with a capital letter: then the author, claiming analysis, not only does not own the topic, but simply does not navigate the basic situation in the Baltic states. If the error is proofreading, then the level of the technological process in the media is below the subfield. Although ... maybe it's a subconscious megalomania? After all, the blooper turned out to be worthy of the president himself as much as the States themselves: he also confused Austria with Australia. And in fact, what is the difference - Lithuania or Latvia - we are talking about global issues !!! Only the dual unity of form and content has not been canceled, and such a form kills confidence in the content. Having stumbled on this place, I literally forced myself to read the material to the end. (By the way, I’m not a specialist in the Baltic States at all, and I met such a person for the first time. Poyandexil - indeed, there is such an ambassador ... naturally, an ambassador Latvia!).

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"