Israeli soldiers shot to death a Palestinian who attacked them with a knife

295
The press service of the Israeli army reported that on Tuesday Israeli soldiers shot dead a Palestinian who attacked a checkpoint in the West Bank armed with a knife.



“A Palestinian tried to stab a soldier with a knife at a checkpoint in Hebron. The attacker was shot dead on the spot ", - leads the press service of the RIA "News".

In addition, a few hours before, the servicemen opened fire on two Palestinians, who attacked and stabbed a soldier near the Jewish settlements of Gush Etzion. Both attackers died.

These attacks continued a series of similar attacks that occur almost every day. In just one month, 10 Israelis were killed, and even more 80 were injured.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

295 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    28 October 2015 09: 47
    Israel play out. Soon the Cubans will come to train Hamas. Yes
    1. +31
      28 October 2015 10: 00
      Quote: keel 31
      Israel play out.

      This is the only way to respond to attacks. The protection of citizens and military personnel is the main task of the state.
      1. +14
        28 October 2015 10: 50
        Quote: vladnn2015
        Quote: keel 31
        Israel play out.

        This is the only way to respond to attacks. The protection of citizens and military personnel is the main task of the state.

        I agree with you. There is still the right to use weapons. Every Palestinian now knows that if he takes out a knife and attacks a Jew, he will most likely be simply shot. By the way, a good deterrent.
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 12: 52
          Quote: Roman1970
          Every Palestinian now knows that if he takes out a knife and attacks a Jew, he will most likely be simply shot.

          That is, a Jew can get a gun, a gun, a rocket, a plane and kill an Arab?
          Interesting logic lol
          1. +10
            28 October 2015 13: 21
            Your logic is limping on both legs.
            Quote: quilted jacket
            if he takes out a knife and attacks a Jew

            If someone takes out a knife and attacks a person, the person has the right to defend himself.
            1. +1
              28 October 2015 17: 32
              Quote: miru mir
              If someone takes out a knife and attacks a person, the person has the right to defend himself.

              Yes, and if this man armed with a machine gun (Israeli Jew) before that took the house from this citizen (Arab), killed his child, crippled his family, what should he do?
              It was you who occupied Palestine, it is you who takes away their homes, and sometimes lives, it is you who bomb the plane and bombard Gaza.
              So what do you want? What would the Arabs bow before you and "kiss" your heels?
              There is only one way to agree to return the land - until it is too late.
              1. -4
                28 October 2015 19: 11
                Quote: quilted jacket
                padded jacket (7) Today, 17:32 ↑

                Tomorrow in Israel, a mess will begin and these professors, pimples and other peace activists will seize themselves in Russia, and most interestingly, they will spoil here. Here are preparing for the move http://www.interfax.ru/russia/476070
                1. 0
                  28 October 2015 19: 31
                  Quote: Amnestied
                  tomorrow in Israel will start a mess and these professors, pimples and other peace activists

                  I completely agree as soon as they come running and start telling us tales of how their "unfortunates" are offended and oppressed, and they will begin to press on pity - help.
                  And for example, they themselves recognized different Al-Nusra and IG as terrorists only 25.10.2015 :
                  The Israeli government approved the inclusion of the Islamic State, Al-Nusra Front (Jebhat al-Nusra) and Abdullah Azam Brigades in the list of terrorist organizations. Until now, the listed organizations were not considered terrorist in Israel.
                  http://9tv.co.il/news/2015/10/25/215822.html

                  That is, the Palestinians have terrorists, but IS and Al-Nusra are not terrorists. Fine?
                  1. -3
                    28 October 2015 20: 01
                    Quote: quilted jacket
                    That is, the Palestinians have terrorists, but IS and Al-Nusra are not terrorists. Fine?

                    This is their brainchild, respectively, not terrorists.
        2. -2
          28 October 2015 12: 53
          Quote: Roman1970
          I agree with you. There is still the right to use weapons. Every Palestinian now knows that if he takes out a knife and attacks a Jew, he will most likely be simply shot. By the way, a good deterrent.

          But after all, they openly declared that a hammer would also participate in this process, in addition to a knife, and this is already more serious than a simple stabbing, and there is nothing to guess, they have appointed a hack and destruction for 2016. Everything is much more serious and disgusting. and the "actors" took their places.
      2. +1
        28 October 2015 11: 31
        This is the only way to respond to attacks. The protection of citizens and military personnel is the main task of the state.


        Yes, that’s how it is, of course, so, but, on the other hand, that it was impossible to disarm without killing? After all, it’s so clear that they are under the drugs, since they are going with automatic knives with a knife. Do you imagine what a howl would raise in the same Israel if our border guards or riot police would shoot some Ukrainian or Caucasian Wahhabi who attacked them with a knife.
      3. -2
        28 October 2015 11: 52
        And Palestine, in your opinion, has no right to self-defense ?!
        I would look at you if the Jews put you in a humiliating position, as German police did in the USSR, in the occupied territories.
        No wonder they rehabilitate Hitler today (for such things, earlier, they brought their opponents to court!) And demonize the Palestinians using powerful Jewish media.
        1. +6
          28 October 2015 12: 16
          Quote: Bison
          if the Jews put you in a humiliating position

          What is it like? Give examples? Or do you mean that the Israelis do not let themselves be cut and thereby infringe on the rights of the FILYSTINS?
        2. -6
          28 October 2015 13: 01
          Quote: Bison
          And Palestine, in your opinion, has no right to self-defense ?!

          Now a new trend hutspa. Israel is wetting the Fylystynts and screaming at the hellish planet that the terrorists are saying that they will defend Israel until the last resident of Palestine.
          1. +4
            28 October 2015 13: 26
            Israel is not watering the Fylists, but terrorists. What do you disagree with?
            1. -3
              28 October 2015 13: 40
              Quote: miru mir
              Israel is not watering the Fylists, but terrorists. What do you disagree with?

              One of the bosses of the world media (autonomous citizen) Murdoch-Mordechai, said that Muslims should collectively bear punishment for the terrorist attack in Paris - "the collective panama!"
              s-must-be
              -held-responsible-for-paris-attack /
              Of course, Murdoch-Mordechai means the collective genocide of all Muslims! What did you think? Not the Jews? The stakes in the game are high! Otherwise, the Zionists would not have started a world-wide persecution of all Muslims. And of course, the Zionists themselves will not genocide Muslims, not the tsarist affair, they will be delegated to the Untermens from Israel and European Christians.
              1. +2
                28 October 2015 14: 41
                Quote: Amnestied

                One of the bosses of the world media (autonomous citizen) Murdoch-Mordechai, said that Muslims should collectively bear punishment for the terrorist attack in Paris - "the collective panama!"
                s-must-be
                -held-responsible-for-paris-attack /
                Of course, Murdoch-Mordechai means the collective genocide of all Muslims! What did you think? Not the Jews? The stakes in the game are high! Otherwise, the Zionists would not have started a world-wide persecution of all Muslims. And of course, the Zionists themselves will not genocide Muslims, not the tsarist affair, they will be delegated to the Untermens from Israel and European Christians.


                I wonder what side the parishioner of the Anglican Church Rupert Murdoch (Murdoch, if anything, last name) became a Jew? Due to the fact that it owns the media? So actually giyur is not done through media ownership
                1. -4
                  28 October 2015 15: 22
                  Quote: Pimply
                  I wonder what side the parishioner of the Anglican Church Rupert Murdoch (Murdoch, if anything, last name) became a Jew? Due to the fact that it owns the media? So actually giyur is not done through media ownership

                  Hey Sayan, why are you pretending to be, huh? and you ascribe to me some kind of shnyag, there is written in black and white sho entot man AUSTRALIAN, AUSTRALIAN CARL! laughing
                  So be afraid, don’t worry like that .. There will be, there will certainly be, lots of money, but you will not like the price very much. Nobody will be able to sit on the sidelines, this I can give you 1 milen percent.
                  1. +3
                    28 October 2015 20: 55
                    Quote: Amnestied
                    So ugh be afraid

                    Using Albanian, hackneyed hutspu cliches from xenophobic articles, world conspiracies, Zionism ... Where did you get such a miracle? Did you arrive at Vatnik’s regiment?
                    1. -8
                      28 October 2015 21: 56
                      Quote: Rumata
                      Using Albanian, hackneyed hutspu cliches from xenophobic articles, world conspiracies, Zionism ... Where did you get such a miracle? Did you arrive at Vatnik’s regiment?

                      Oh, so right away and kicking ??? So comrade Putin said right now we are not 37 years old. And you are so straightforward right away, without pathos and legs ...
                      Are you circumcised on day 8? Shaw ?? Circumcised but not on day 8, are you uncircumcised at all? Well, you don’t have to shine at all ... Don’t even think. laughing
    2. +14
      28 October 2015 10: 01
      Quote: keel 31
      Israel play out.

      Are Jews attacking the Palestinians?
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 10: 22
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: keel 31
        Israel play out.

        Are Jews attacking the Palestinians?

        I meant that the two countries did not support the UN resolution on lifting the blockade from Cuba. The USA and Israel did not support, all other countries of the world were in favor. So, Cuba can take offense, drive for example a weapon on a ship. hi
      2. +4
        28 October 2015 10: 47
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Are Jews attacking the Palestinians?


        The sowed wind is reaping the storm.

        In the years 47-48, the Jews practically carried out their Holocaust for the Palestinians. More than 13 thousand civilians were killed, hundreds of thousands were simply driven out of their land, appropriating it.

        Is it worth wondering the Palestinian hatred of Israel?
        1. -3
          28 October 2015 11: 22
          Nonsense is complete. Where, then, in Israel under the lemon Arabs with Israeli citizenship?
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 11: 28
            You first study the question on the topic "The Arab-Israeli War of 1947-1949."
            Especially stressing the paragraph "humanitarian disaster".
            1. +3
              28 October 2015 12: 17
              When did neighboring Arab countries declare a state of destruction to the created state?
              1. -2
                28 October 2015 17: 55
                Quote: miru mir
                When did neighboring Arab countries declare a state of destruction to the created state?


                No, when they refused to share its country and leave with its of the earth.
                Catch the difference?
                1. +2
                  28 October 2015 18: 00
                  What was their "country" called that? Where was their capital, what currency did they use? What was the name of the leader of the country?
                  1. -1
                    28 October 2015 18: 22
                    There was a British colony. But what does it have to do with it?
                    They drove people who lived there for generations from their land! Which did not care what the big white people decided in the strange UN. They simply did not want to lose theirs.
                    Hundreds of thousands of people lost all overnight. At the same time, there was genocide of those who did not want to leave the land of their ancestors - 13 thousand civilians killed in 2 years!

                    And after that, you are surprised that the descendants of those very dead, deprived of everything, throw themselves at you with knives?
                    1. +2
                      28 October 2015 21: 09
                      Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                      There was a British colony. But what does it have to do with it?

                      So was the British colony or their country? Decide already? And about the fact that the Arab leaders called on all Muslims to leave their homes, you probably also did not hear? And where does the figure of 13 come from, if only 000 Arabs died in this war, including military and civilians?
                      It is interesting if 13 is genocide, then what should one and a half million dead in Afghanistan be called, all were fighters? What about the 000 civilians killed in the First Chechen?

                      After 1950, in wars and other conflicts around the world, 85 million people died, the loss of both sides in the Arab-Israeli conflict, over these 000 years, make up 000% of this amount. Not funny yourself?
                      1. +2
                        28 October 2015 21: 48
                        Quote: Rumata
                        74 years

                        of the year*
                      2. +1
                        28 October 2015 21: 54
                        Quote: Rumata
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        There was a British colony. But what does it have to do with it?

                        So was the British colony or their country? Decide already? And about the fact that the Arab leaders called on all Muslims to leave their homes, you probably also did not hear? And where does the figure of 13 come from, if only 000 Arabs died in this war, including military and civilians?
                        It is interesting if 13 is genocide, then what should one and a half million dead in Afghanistan be called, all were fighters? What about the 000 civilians killed in the First Chechen?

                        After 1950, in wars and other conflicts around the world, 85 million people died, the loss of both sides in the Arab-Israeli conflict, over these 000 years, make up 000% of this amount. Not funny yourself?

                        Where does this figure come from for "What about 55 civilians who died in the First Chechen?" 000 - this figure is taken from the ceiling. There are no exact estimates.
                      3. +4
                        28 October 2015 22: 42
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Where does this figure come from for "What about 55 civilians who died in the First Chechen?" 000 - this figure is taken from the ceiling. There are no exact estimates.

                        There are not only accurate, not even official estimates. That is, they did not even count. The memorial counted 50. Later Roskomstat gave an estimate of 000 - 30, let's say 40 died. Is this genocide? Often at VO, people reproach others for being strange in double standards, but they themselves regularly resort to them. You take all those who died during the war, call them civilians, drag in genocide and voila, the message is ready.
                      4. 0
                        28 October 2015 23: 34
                        Quote: Rumata
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Where does this figure come from for "What about 55 civilians who died in the First Chechen?" 000 - this figure is taken from the ceiling. There are no exact estimates.

                        There are not only accurate, not even official estimates. That is, they did not even count. The memorial counted 50. Later Roskomstat gave an estimate of 000 - 30, let's say 40 died. Is this genocide? Often at VO, people reproach others for being strange in double standards, but they themselves regularly resort to them. You take all those who died during the war, call them civilians, drag in genocide and voila, the message is ready.

                        30-40 thousand are the data of the Memorial, on which the Goskomstat relied. This figure is the death of both Russian and Chechen civilians. My question is only to the number. It's just that you so confidently wrote about 55 thousand.
                      5. +2
                        28 October 2015 23: 57
                        Quote: Your friend
                        this is the memorial data

                        Memorial's estimate is 50 civilians, the State Statistics Committee lowered it to 000-30. Apart from the Memorial, there were other estimates. Some counted more than 40. Apart from the State Statistics Committee, no one named the figure below 000, even the most loyal office authorities spoke of "about 100 civilian deaths." If I wrote 000, then you can understand, but the figure of 50 is quite logical, especially when you consider what was considered by different methods and received similar results
                        http://www.memo.ru/hr/hotpoints/caucas1/msg/2004/12/m28922.htm
                        Quote: Your friend
                        This number of dead both Russian and Chechen civilians

                        This is the figure of the dead citizens of the Russian Federation, what is the difference between Russians, Chechens or Tatars?
                      6. 0
                        29 October 2015 00: 44
                        Memorial's estimate is 50 civilians, the State Statistics Committee lowered it to 000-30. Apart from the Memorial, there were other estimates. Some counted more than 40. Apart from the State Statistics Committee, no one named the figure below 000, even the most loyal office authorities spoke of "about 100 civilian deaths." If I wrote 000, then you can understand, but the figure of 50 is quite logical, especially when you consider what was considered by different methods and received similar results

                        I don’t know where you got the figure of 50 thousand.
                        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Людские_потери_в_Первой_чеченской_войне
                        I know there were estimates at 120 thousand from Maskhadov. The article also estimates the number of victims less than 20 thousand.
                        Honestly, I don’t understand what the logic of the 50 thousand figure is. Nobody really considered it. There could be 10, 50, or 100 thousand victims.
                        This is the figure of the dead citizens of the Russian Federation, what is the difference between Russians, Chechens or Tatars?

                        No difference. And what?
                      7. 0
                        29 October 2015 02: 10
                        Quote: Your friend
                        I don’t know where you got the figure of 50 thousand.

                        In my answer there is a link to the site of Memorial. About 50, I wrote. In addition to the memorial, there were other organizations that came to a similar figure. In addition, in the late 000s, many military men related to this war expressed their assessments, also in the region of 90-40. Plus, if Roskomstat took the Memorial data as a basis, then they are close to the truth. What is not the logic of the numbers? Or in your Roskomstat figure overestimated? Is the official data logical that less than 50 civilians died in the Second Chechen, while at least 000 times more are known by name? Who to believe?
                        If 6-7 different sources indicate a single digit, then the chance that it is true is higher. It goes without saying with 100% certainty, but with 90% it is.
                      8. 0
                        29 October 2015 11: 43
                        So, your first statement is 55 thousand.
                        At the Memorial, if you take their numbers, it is written not 50 thousand, but "up to 50 thousand", do not find that this is very vague.
                        Not Roskomstat, but Goskomstat took the figures of the Memorial - because the state. authorities did not conduct official registration of the dead. All these 6-7 sources are based on Memorial data. I gave you examples when they estimated that less than 20 thousand and more than 120. How confidence can be less than 100%. Are you either sure or not.)
                        Is the official data logical that less than 1000 civilians died in the Second Chechen, while at least 5 times more are known by name? Who to believe?

                        Who knows "by name" that "at least 5 times more" died? And why "at least" if someone knows the exact, "name-by-name" list of the dead?
                        "6.5 to 10.5 civilians (according to Human Rights Watch)." is an excellent list by name.
                        "5.3 to 10.7 thousand people (information of" Memorial ")" - another list of names. Nonsense.

                        So I’m telling you that all these numbers are absolutely not clear where they came from. Where do you see logic here, I do not know.
                      9. 0
                        29 October 2015 16: 43
                        ndya ...
                        Quote: Your friend
                        took the numbers of the Memorial - because the state. authorities did not conduct official registration of the dead.

                        They did not take the numbers of the Memorial, they issued theirs below.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        All these 6-7 sources are based on Memorial data.

                        Who said? In the interview, the military, who called the figure of 50, also took the data of the Memorial? There were other estimates, statistical estimates using the change in the percentage of widows and widowers in the 000 and 1989 census, in the same way, for example, they specified the number of people who died in World War II. When I write 2002-6, this is not 7-6 reposts of Memorial data, it is 7-6 different types of calculations.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        How confidence can be less than 100%. Are you either sure or not.)

                        What nonsense? No need to start philosophizing. According to David Hume, you cannot be 100% sure of anything at all, even if all the facts indicate this. If this is the way to approach the question, then Gagarin is not a fact that he flew, and Stalin was probably a reptilian.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Who knows "by name" that "at least 5 times more" died? And why "at least"

                        If there is a figure of estimates of 900-1000 people, and we know about 5000 by name, then it turns out that the named data is 5.6 - 5 times higher than the official ones, that is, at least 5 times ...

                        Quote: Your friend
                        "6.5 to 10.5 civilians (according to Human Rights Watch)." is an excellent list by name.
                        "5.3 to 10.7 thousand people (information of" Memorial ")" - another list of names. Nonsense.

                        So I’m telling you that all these numbers are absolutely not clear where they came from. Where do you see logic here, I do not know.

                        Why do all numbers start with 5000? Because the figure is of the famous victims. The rest is estimates about missing and others. I don’t know where it came from? And the losses of the Great Patriotic War are also unknown from where taken? Then maybe not 27, but 000-000 perished? And the casualty figure among civilians is 1 million, so round, not 2, what is the chance that it happened? Such calculations will not when will not be 15% accurate, so now they should not be trusted at all?

                        Even if we take the figure of 35, how does this change the meaning of what I wrote? This is as much as the Arabs perished in all the Arab-Israeli wars in 000 years. If you do not agree with the numbers, your right is 75% impossible to prove this and everyone believes the data that seems more logical to him.
                      10. 0
                        29 October 2015 17: 09
                        Once again, your first figure was 55 thousand, where did you get it from, I don’t know. Then for some reason you began to write about 50 thousand.
                        They did not take the numbers of the Memorial, they issued theirs below.

                        Who said? In the interview, the military, who called the figure of 50, also took the data of the Memorial? There were other estimates, statistical estimates using the change in the percentage of widows and widowers in the 000 and 1989 census, in the same way, for example, they specified the number of people who died in World War II. When I write 2002-6, this is not 7-6 reposts of Memorial data, it is 7-6 different types of calculations.

                        Which military? Give an example. What are the percentages of widows, widowers ??? What are you writing about ??? A lot of people whose relatives died were dispersed across Russia, left for Azerbaijan, in other countries, many Chechens generally left for Europe. What about their dead relatives? This is complete nonsense.
                        What nonsense? No need to start philosophizing. According to David Hume, you cannot be 100% sure of anything at all, even if all the facts indicate this. If this is the way to approach the question, then Gagarin is not a fact that he flew, and Stalin was probably a reptilian

                        What nonsense. Do you argue with yourself? Why did you drag Yuma? What are you about??? I am sure that Gagarin flew into space, and Stalin was a man. If you are not sure, then this is your problem.
                        If there is a figure of estimates of 900-1000 people, and we know about 5000 by name, then it turns out that the named data is 5.6 - 5 times higher than the official ones, that is, at least 5 times ...

                        Why do all numbers start with 5000? Because the figure is of the famous victims. The rest is estimates about missing and others. I don’t know where it came from? And the losses of the Great Patriotic War are also unknown from where taken? Then maybe not 27, but 000-000 perished? And the casualty figure among civilians is 1 million, so round, not 2, what is the chance that it happened? Such calculations will not when will not be 15% accurate, so now they should not be trusted at all?

                        Once again, you wrote that there are "roll-call lists". The list of names cannot be "5.3 to 10.7 thousand people". Named for that and named that EVERY victim is known. Do not drag BOB. We are talking about the Chechen wars and how you approve the "list of names".
                        Even if we take the figure of 35, how does this change the meaning of what I wrote? This is as much as the Arabs perished in all the Arab-Israeli wars in 000 years. If you do not agree with the numbers, your right is 75% impossible to prove this and everyone believes the data that seems more logical to him.

                        Lord, I have already written to you once (below). Why do you write me about the "meaning" again.
                        My question is only to the number. It's just that you so confidently wrote about 55 thousand.
                      11. +1
                        29 October 2015 18: 29
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Once again, your first figure was 55 thousand, where did you get it from, I don’t know. Then for some reason you began to write about 50 thousand.

                        This figure I adhere to. At one time, I shoveled a bunch of materials, and came to the conclusion that 50-55 are most likely. It is clear to anyone that in such conflicts it is impossible to give an exact figure, if I wrote 000, it goes without saying that around 55. You found fault. If I called 000 referring to the Memorial, they would still find fault with "but there are those who claim about 55". I can’t name everyone by name, and of course, any number that I name will not be 000% accurate. These are elementary things, but they organized a circus.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Which military?

                        Am I going to look for these interviews to prove something to someone? Or 10 years ago when I was interested in this, did I need to remember all the names and titles? What am I doing? Do not believe? Do you think the number is lower or higher? Flag in my hands, I’m absolutely on the drum
                      12. 0
                        29 October 2015 18: 29
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Give an example. What are the percentages of widows, widowers ??? What are you writing about ??? A lot of people whose relatives died were dispersed across Russia, went to Azerbaijan, to other countries, many Chechens generally left for Europe. What about their dead relatives? This is complete nonsense.

                        How neglected ... You are arguing about what you do not understand at all. How to calculate the death toll using only two population censuses and statistics from the early 90s? There are several methods for this, which were resorted to by those 6-7 groups of which I mentioned. One of them is the calculation through the percentage of widows and widowers. If they left for Azerbaijan, then they will not be included in the census, what is the connection? Due to the fact that people have left Chechnya, it is impossible to compare simple numbers of the population, you need to use other algorithms. The calculation is carried out using different data, which are then superimposed on one another to determine the correlations. What do you think, they went and asked the neighbors "has anyone died?" Such things have been used for many years all over the world, if this is news and nonsense for you, what have I to do with it?
                        Quote: Your friend
                        What nonsense. Do you argue with yourself? Why did you drag Yuma? What are you about??? I am sure that Gagarin flew into space, and Stalin was a man. If you are not sure, then this is your problem.

                        You wrote that if you are sure, then this is 100%. We cannot be 100% sure of anything, this is the basis of epistemology. You demand from me 100% confidence, so I dragged Yuma. Gagarin flew? Prove? Our whole dispute will be repeated, you will bring some photos and videos, I will write that there are those who claim the opposite, fake, etc. Where are we going? That Gagarin did not fly? Prove that Stalin was not a reptilian? I'll tell you a secret - this is not possible in principle. Therefore, there is no need to demand from me all sorts of things "whether I'm sure or not" and so on. Of course, my opinion is based on data in which I cannot be 100% sure, this does not mean that this opinion should not be at all. TO
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Once again, you wrote that there are "roll-call lists". The list of names cannot be "5.3 to 10.7 thousand people".

                        Where did I write that there is a list of names 5.3 - 10.7? Poke your face? You brought these numbers, I talked about 5000. And 6.5 - 10 700 is not a list of names, but the total number of victims. If the problem with reading comprehension, then I duplicate
                        . Assessments by human rights organizations suggest that the period of active hostilities - from autumn 1999 to spring 2000 - from 6.5 to 10.5 civilians died in Chechnya (Human Rights Watch).
                        Where is it by name? Next what? Need to show the same list of 5000 names? Then a copy of the death certificates of each of them?
                        Shapito circus. Do you require 100% proof from me that 55 died? I will give them to you as soon as you prove that Lenin was not born on Alpha Centauri. Good luck
                      13. 0
                        29 October 2015 19: 05
                        How neglected ... You are arguing about what you do not understand at all. How to calculate the death toll using only two population censuses and statistics from the early 90s? There are several methods for this, which were resorted to by those 6-7 groups of which I mentioned. One of them is the calculation through the number of widows and widowers. If they left for Azerbaijan, then they will not be in the register, what is the connection? Due to the fact that people have left Chechnya, it is impossible to compare simple numbers of the population, you need to use other algorithms. The calculation is carried out using different data, which are then superimposed on one another to determine the correlations. What do you think, they went and asked the neighbors "has anyone died?" Such things have been used for many years all over the world, if this is news and nonsense for you, what have I to do with it?

                        What? As if the widower, whose spouse was killed, left for another country, then he will not get into the statistics, because you yourself wrote in Russian - "One of them is calculations through the number of widows and widowers." Those. the count is already wrong. And actually, during the census, they go and interview people. What different data can I use? The only data is the death of a civilian. And according to your "correlations", the number of civilians killed is from 20 to 120 thousand. Correlate further, like all over the world)))
                        What nonsense. Do you argue with yourself? Why did you drag Yuma? What are you about??? I am sure that Gagarin flew into space, and Stalin was a man. If you are not sure, then this is your problem.

                        No, I agree if Stalin is a 10% reptiloid for you, because according to Hume, you are not 100% sure that Stalin is human. For God's sake. These are your personal problems.)))
                        Where did I write that there is a list of names 5.3 - 10.7? Poke your face? You brought these numbers, I talked about 5000. And this is not a list of names, but the total number of deaths that you brought. If a problem with reading comprehension, then I duplicate
                        . Estimates of human rights organizations suggest that during the period of active hostilities - from autumn 1999 to spring 2000 - from 6.5 to 10.5 civilians died in Chechnya (Human Rights Watch).
                        Where is it by name? Next what? Would you like to show the same list of 5000 names? Then a copy of the death certificates of each of them?
                        Shapito circus.

                        And where I stated that you wrote "what is the list of names 5.3 - 10.7?" "Poke your face"?))) Thinking it up? Not good.
                        Oh my God. You wrote:
                        Is the official data logical that less than 1000 civilians died in the Second Chechen, while at least 5 times more are known by name? Who to believe?

                        Least!!! It can be 6 times more, 10 times more. This is your phrase, not I wrote it. This is really a circus tent.
                        Which copies, which list? Where do I demand this from you? Stop already.
                      14. 0
                        29 October 2015 19: 51
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Least!!! It can be 6 times more, 10 times more. This is your phrase, not I wrote it.

                        At least because it is compared with official data. I wrote, did you read at all? If there is an exact figure and it is compared with 900-1000 range, then the comparison will be the same. Where I wrote about 6-10 000 by name you did not answer ..
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Brrrrr ... Well, where does Gagarin, well, why do you mention him. You can believe that he flew. And you can not believe it. You can’t believe that he flew 50%. This is nonsense, why are you arguing?

                        Despite the fact that this is the same. You can’t say for 100% that Gagarin flew, and you demand 100% confidence in me from the numbers, the calculation of which is a very complicated process.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        And actually, during the census, people go and interview people. What different data can be used?

                        The census was 8 years after the war. Which from home to home?
                        Quote: Your friend
                        What? As if the widower, whose spouse was killed, left for another country, then he will not get into the statistics, because you yourself wrote in Russian - "One of them is calculations through the number of widows and widowers."

                        Calculate the percentage outflow of people from Chechnya, if there is statistical data, and extrapolate this to the percentage of widows and widowers in the censuses of 2002 and 1989. Compare with the statistical data for the districts where accurate calculations were made after the war, etc., etc. Just take, go and count? I am already silent about the fact that the 2002 census is very ambiguous, especially in Chechnya. Why then in all conflicts the number of victims has such a spread? What are the official sources based on, which take this scatter and give one number? World War II, Afghanistan, Chechen, Vietnam, etc. There byoo it is problematic to count everyone by name, how do you think they came to the final numbers? Arrange an educational program for yourself how exactly such things are considered, you will understand why it is often scattered by an order of magnitude and can form a model for yourself how to determine which sources can be trusted. And which are not based on the methods that they used. Why is the Memorial more or less trusted, but Kadyrov with his 100 is not? Not because he has a beard, but because the methods of calculating the Memorial are more accurate. But the real numbers we will not know not when

                        Then I retire, there is nothing to argue about. Good luck
                      15. 0
                        29 October 2015 20: 24
                        At least because it is compared with official data. I wrote, did you read at all? If there is an exact figure and it is compared with 900-1000 range, then the comparison will be the same. Where I wrote about 6-10 000 by name you did not answer ..

                        Yes, as much as possible. You yourself gave a link to the Memorial. There it is written in Russian that there is no official data !!! There is some data from the Memorial, from Moskhadov, from you. Enough to invent.
                        About by name I answered you. Read carefully. Duplicate. Here is my answer.
                        Your friend: Where did I say that you wrote "what is the list of names 5.3 - 10.7?" "Poke your face"?))) Thinking it up? Not good.

                        Despite the fact that this is the same. You can’t say for 100% that Gagarin flew, and you demand 100% confidence in me from the numbers, the calculation of which is a very complicated process.

                        Twenty five again. I affirm that Gagarin flew into space. You can not be 90% sure that Gagarin flew into space. You can not be sure that Gagarin flew into space. ((((((((
                        The census was 8 years after the war. Which from home to home? Calculate the percentage outflow of people from Chechnya, if there is statistical data, and extrapolate this to the percentage of widows and widowers in the censuses of 2002 and 1989. Compare with statistical data for districts where accurate calculations were made after the war, etc., etc. Just take, go and count? I am already silent about the fact that the 2002 census is very ambiguous, especially in Chechnya. Why then in all conflicts the number of victims has such a spread? What are the official sources based on, which take this scatter and give one number? World War II, Afghanistan, Chechen, Vietnam, etc. There byoo it is problematic to count everyone by name, how do you think they came to the final numbers? Arrange an educational program for yourself how exactly such things are considered, you will understand why it is often scattered by an order of magnitude and can form a model for yourself how to determine which sources can be trusted. And which are not based on the methods that they used. Why is the Memorial more or less trusted, but Kadyrov with his 100 is not? Not because he has a beard, but because the methods of calculating the Memorial are more accurate. But the real numbers we will not know not when

                        This is full. What educational program. Then your calculations are based on the census:
                        Rumata: How to calculate the death toll using only two censuses and statistics from the early 90's?

                        That census cannot be trusted:
                        Rumata: I am already silent about the fact that the 2002 census is very ambiguous, especially in Chechnya.

                        So you think that you, that the Memorial, that Maskhadov.)
                        What makes you think that the Memorial is more or less believed. Yes, none of them can not be trusted.
                      16. 0
                        29 October 2015 21: 04
                        Then I retire, there is nothing to argue about. Good luck

                        Excellent.) Convincingly, write this phrase - "What about the 55 civilians who died in the First Chechen War?", And then write - "And we will not know the real numbers when." I'm 000% sure that you are right.))))
                      17. 0
                        29 October 2015 18: 41
                        Quote: Rumata
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Once again, your first figure was 55 thousand, where did you get it from, I don’t know. Then for some reason you began to write about 50 thousand.

                        This figure I adhere to. At one time, I shoveled a bunch of materials, and came to the conclusion that 50-55 are most likely. It is clear to anyone that in such conflicts it is impossible to give an exact figure, if I wrote 000, it goes without saying that around 55. You found fault. If I called 000 referring to the Memorial, they would still find fault with "but there are those who claim about 55". I can’t name everyone by name, and of course, any number that I name will not be 000% accurate. These are elementary things, but they organized a circus.
                        Quote: Your friend
                        Which military?

                        Am I going to look for these interviews to prove something to someone? Or 10 years ago when I was interested in this, did I need to remember all the names and titles? What am I doing? Do not believe? Do you think the number is lower or higher? Flag in my hands, I’m absolutely on the drum

                        Ask where you got 55 thousand from. is it to find fault? I just asked because the figure is weird. They would immediately write "this figure which I adhere to." And then the Memorial, the "military" dragged.
                        Ok, I get it, now, wherever you post any figure, I will know that "this figure which you adhere to" and you "do not believe? Do you think the figure is lower or higher? Flag in hand, I absolutely do not drum ". So they would say right away.)))
                      18. 0
                        29 October 2015 18: 50
                        Quote: Your friend
                        They would immediately write "this figure which I adhere to." And then the Memorial, the "military" dragged.

                        Well, what can you argue about? Gagarin did you fly? This is the opinion that you will adhere to based on some facts. On the stories of friends, films, photos, textbooks. We agree with you on Gagrin, in Chechnya I stick to the figure of about 55, but it is not taken from the ceiling. All your claims can be used against anything. I mentioned that in my reply. where and from where. Why all these "there are people who say about something else"? What is the use of this in a dispute, we disagree, and that's all. There are some people who do not believe that Gagarin flew, does this somehow affect you and me, given that there is a chance that they are right?
                      19. 0
                        29 October 2015 19: 08
                        Quote: Rumata
                        Quote: Your friend
                        They would immediately write "this figure which I adhere to." And then the Memorial, the "military" dragged.

                        Well, what can you argue about? Gagarin did you fly? This is the opinion that you will adhere to based on some facts. On the stories of friends, films, photos, textbooks. We agree with you on Gagrin, in Chechnya I stick to the figure of about 55, but it is not taken from the ceiling. All your claims can be used against anything. I mentioned that in my reply. where and from where. Why all these "there are people who say about something else"? What is the use of this in a dispute, we disagree, and that's all. There are some people who do not believe that Gagarin flew, does this somehow affect you and me, given that there is a chance that they are right?

                        Brrrrr ... Well, where does Gagarin, well, why do you mention him. You can believe that he flew. And you can not believe it. You can’t believe that he flew 50%. This is nonsense, why are you arguing?
                      20. -1
                        28 October 2015 22: 39
                        Quote: Rumata
                        So was the British colony or their country?


                        What words cling to? Colony, was, colony. What does it change?

                        The message was different. Without justifying terrorists, the result is always the same:
                        The sowed wind is reaping the storm.
                        What are you doing now
                      21. 0
                        28 October 2015 23: 27
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        What words cling to?

                        I pointed out the facts, most Arabs left home because of their own leaders, who frightened them with the imaginary atrocities of the Jews. The dead civilians were at least three times less than 13. Those who remained were not genocide, Arab cities and villages were often captured without firing a shot. That you throw words, the facts will be?
          2. +1
            28 October 2015 20: 57
            Quote: miru mir
            complete runda. Where, then, in Israel under the lemon Arabs with Israeli citizenship?

            Israel has 1.2 million Arabs, 90% of whom are Muslims.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. The comment was deleted.
    3. -7
      28 October 2015 10: 04
      Quote: keel 31
      Israel play out. Soon the Cubans will come to train Hamas.

      It was already. And not only Cubans
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 11: 25
        Quote: Pimply
        Quote: keel 31
        Israel play out. Soon the Cubans will come to train Hamas.

        It was already. And not only Cubans

        Did Cubans train Hamas? Was that serious?
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 13: 47
          Quote: Your friend
          Did Cubans train Hamas? Was that serious?

          The Cubans participated in hostilities against Israel (in particular, in the 1973 they sent about 3000 fighters to participate in the so-called Doomsday War) and trained the children who were the forerunners of Hamas. But what are some Palestinian terrorists called and how they differ from others in this situation is not so important, my little illiterate friend
          1. +2
            28 October 2015 14: 38
            Quote: Pimply
            Quote: Your friend
            Did Cubans train Hamas? Was that serious?

            The Cubans participated in hostilities against Israel (in particular, in the 1973 they sent about 3000 fighters to participate in the so-called Doomsday War) and trained the children who were the forerunners of Hamas. But what are some Palestinian terrorists called and how they differ from others in this situation is not so important, my little illiterate friend

            I will remind you of the dialogue.
            They wrote to you - "Soon Cubans will come and train Hamas."
            You answered - "It was already. And not only Cubans"
            I tell you - "Did the Cubans train Hamas? Was that serious?"
            You answered - "The Cubans took part in hostilities against Israel (in particular, in 1973 they sent about 3000 fighters to participate in the so-called Yom Kippur War) and trained the guys who were the harbingers of Hamas."
            You really have something wrong with the logic and the head.)))
            "my little illiterate friend" - I understand you are struggling with your everyday life, but the struggle goes on with varying success.)))
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 14: 45
              Quote: Your friend
              You really have something wrong with the logic and the head.)))

              I see you mastered the keyboard shortcut for copying text, my little friend? Well done, so, you look, and learn to read
              1. +2
                28 October 2015 14: 55
                Quote: Pimply
                Quote: Your friend
                You really have something wrong with the logic and the head.)))

                I see you mastered the keyboard shortcut for copying text, my little friend? Well done, so, you look, and learn to read

                I did everything for your comfort, to show that you have bigger problems with logic, apparently with your head. (((
                "You", "my little illiterate friend", "Well done, so, you look, and learn to read" - in your head "would." Won in an unequal struggle. (((
                Did the Hamas Cubans train?)))
              2. The comment was deleted.
      2. -3
        28 October 2015 13: 08
        Quote: Pimply
        It was already. And not only Cubans

        Fima change the rabbi or the synagogue are deceiving you, you are the paid mossad. laughing
    4. +2
      28 October 2015 10: 13
      Quote: keel 31
      Israel play out.

      About young Jews running around with knives and injuring Palestinians, they are categorically silent!
      Quote: keel 31
      Soon Cubans will come to train Hamas

      It is very possible, in the light of the UN vote on the lifting of the American penguin sanctions, only the United States and Israel voted against, 191 votes voted to lift the sanctions. The question is, what does Israel have to do with it? Or does it bend deeper and deeper before the owners? However, Cuba, on occasion, will remind the young state of the Jews what democracy is.
      1. +4
        28 October 2015 10: 15
        Quote: Hedgehog
        However, Cuba, on occasion, will remind the young state of the Jews what democracy is.

        You yourself are not funny?
        1. +14
          28 October 2015 10: 23
          But admins, provocateurs! tongue

          Yesterday's topic continues .... - http://topwar.ru/85111-zamechaniya-na-rossiysko-izrailskuyu-temu.html

          For a day, mass availability on the site laughing

          on the topic of the article:
          The soldiers did what they had to do, then they and the soldiers.
          1. +3
            28 October 2015 10: 43
            Quote: Bombardier
            But admins, provocateurs

            So everything is to strengthen the friendship of peoples wink
        2. 0
          28 October 2015 10: 29
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          You yourself are not funny?

          So funny that tears flow. Especially looking at Sher Khan and Tobacco.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 10: 43
            Quote: Hedgehog
            Especially looking at Sher Khan and Tobacco.

            Hard for you probably wink
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 10: 21
        And there are a lot of such jabbers, with knives chasing the FILYSTINS?
        1. +6
          28 October 2015 10: 34
          Quote: miru mir
          And there are a lot of such raffles, with knives for FILYSTINS

          Do not cross Russian, do not demonstrate your ignorance.
          If you don’t even read your press, what can help you? Or is the Israeli democratic press pressing only Palestinians?
          1. -2
            28 October 2015 11: 25
            Thanks for the advice (I'm talking about the great and mighty), but somehow get along. And I do not expect or ask for help from you. Let's refer to the brutal attacks of the Israelis with knives.
            1. +4
              28 October 2015 11: 55
              Quote: miru mir
              Let's refer to the brutal attacks of the Israelis

              Unhappy, even banned in Google. http://nashe.orbita.co.il/blogs/events/56104
              1. -3
                28 October 2015 12: 20
                Yeah, that means you can slaughter an Arab, and a robe, defending himself, who attacked, heaped up a nini. Strong logic in unbanned Google.
                1. +6
                  28 October 2015 13: 07
                  Jews in Israel are also engaged in "terrorism" only not with knives like the Arabs, but with guns, aircraft and tanks. Both sides are to blame for what is happening - but primarily Israel.
                2. 0
                  28 October 2015 13: 33
                  Quote: miru mir
                  Strong logic in unbanned Google.
                  There is no logic for the banned when it comes to Jews. They can do anything, right? Here it is, real anti-Semitism on the part of the Zionists and their supporters.
                  1. -4
                    28 October 2015 14: 20
                    When and if you will be cut, do not forget to stretch your arms at the seams.
            2. -2
              28 October 2015 12: 38
              Fuck you damn))), traitor and cock! All your arguments)))), the arguments of a renegade and the hell ((((((((((((((((((you just went
          2. -1
            28 October 2015 13: 15
            Quote: Hedgehog
            Do not cross Russian, do not demonstrate your ignorance.

            As Gavrim and write. When is it necessary and where is it necessary with us? TWO RRRRR, from the word tractor, and not from the word LYba laughing
      3. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 30
        Dear Hedgehog, do you at least rule the Cuban Foreign Ministry?
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 11: 49
          Quote: ankir13
          Do you rule in the Cuban Foreign Ministry?

          And do not envy! Envy does not color anyone. Read the press for more. Or is there evidence that the vote is opaque and not democratic?
      4. +3
        28 October 2015 13: 50
        Quote: Hedgehog
        About young Jews running around with knives and injuring Palestinians, they are categorically silent!

        No, actually. There was a case that ended in a prison for the runner.
        And unlike the Palestinian community, in Israel such actions do not cause sharp approval, and festive processions through the streets. In Israel, such morons are treated as they should - as sick and dangerous psychos.
    5. +1
      28 October 2015 10: 36
      Quote: keel 31
      Soon Cubans will come to train Hamas

      And think first, before you blur something is impossible? You are our hasty.
    6. +2
      28 October 2015 10: 46
      Israeli soldiers shot to death a Palestinian who attacked them with a knife


      It is sad that such news is already becoming commonplace, as if it were reported that an accident occurred yesterday.
    7. +1
      28 October 2015 11: 25
      Mr. Kil 31, I wish you a personal meeting with such a ponazhivschik, which will be trained by the Cubans. And in order for you to be defenseless at the same time, for the severity of ossifications ... National sharp - dagger in the ass forgotten in any way?
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 36
        Quote: ankir13
        Mr. Kil 31, I wish you a personal meeting with such a ponazhivschik, which will be trained by the Cubans. And in order for you to be defenseless at the same time, for the severity of ossifications ... National sharp - dagger in the ass forgotten in any way?

        I want to meet more with those who decided to support the United States against the resolution on lifting the blockade from Cuba. Israel, how does the blockade of Cuba affect the issue? hi
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 19: 31
          Quote: keel 31
          I want to meet more with those who decided to support the United States against the resolution on lifting the blockade from Cuba. Israel, how does the blockade of Cuba affect the issue?

          And now what? Is Cuba in blockade? wink
  2. +1
    28 October 2015 09: 48
    Everything is logical. No "Stop shooting, I will!" In the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, they killed a district police officer who warned the drunken rowdy several times. Verbally warned, without shooting into the air.
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 10: 06
      Quote: Decathlon
      Everything is logical. No "Stop shooting, I will!" In the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, they killed a district police officer who warned the drunken rowdy several times. Verbally warned, without shooting into the air.

      Who told you not? There is a very clear format for opening fire, including this very "Stop! Stop, or I will shoot." Only in the event of a direct threat, the procedure for opening fire is shortened accordingly.
      1. +8
        28 October 2015 10: 14
        I am aware of such an application procedure. I had to encounter in 1988 at the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Magadan Regional Executive Committee. But, believe me, it is better to “unsubscribe” in the prosecutor’s office for half a year than to “show off” on a bronze memorial plaque at the entrance to the regional department. All the more, knowing that you were right, according to the findings of the prosecutor's check! hi
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 10: 30
          Quote: Decathlon
          But, believe me, it is better to “unsubscribe” at the prosecutor’s office for six months, rather than “show off” on a bronze memorial plaque at the entrance to the regional department.

          Let three judge better than four bear! (C)
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 00
        That is, that is, but in this case it is necessary to take into account the time and distance from the attacker to the victim. You must get the service weapon, and this is all the time.
      3. -1
        28 October 2015 13: 26
        Quote: Pimply
        There is a very clear format for opening fire, including this very "Stop! Stop, or I will shoot." Only in the event of a direct threat, the procedure for opening fire is shortened accordingly.

        It is urgent to intensify monitoring of all agents of the CIA, the mosad, and so on, and everything will be calm, of course, But, since this is not part of their plans, all acts will go according to plan according to the purchased tickets to the stalls and balconies.
    2. -1
      28 October 2015 10: 22
      if it were the other way around, then the district policeman would write explanatory notes before retirement. Here he took a chance, it was not good to see. We have laws like this, why are they always on guard of violators of the law? Are we studying from the West and the USA? and some laws that could be applied here.
  3. +6
    28 October 2015 09: 49
    the concentration camp was made from Palestine, here are the locals and they are being cut, gentlemen Jews, at least go wild, but Israel, along with the United States and European litter, are the main terrorists in the world
    1. +3
      28 October 2015 10: 03
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the concentration camp was made of Palestine, and here the locals are cutting them,

      For example, how is it? Or according to your logic in Dagestan, end the camp, here people are leaving for action, yes.
      1. -2
        28 October 2015 10: 50
        What does the Dagestanis ??? I do not see the relationship
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 12: 06
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        For example, how is it? Or, according to your logic, in Dagestan conc. camp? So, people are going into action, right?

        Invalid comparison. - In Dagestan, no one was forbidden to attend a mosque, unlike Israel.
        1. -1
          28 October 2015 12: 23
          And in Israel, too, were not banned. Why are they only dragging stones with them No.
    2. avt
      +4
      28 October 2015 10: 04
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the concentration camp was made of Palestine

      Well, in fairness, a concentration camp involves a fence with barbed wire along the entire perimeter. Even if you take Gaza alone, then in general the Egyptians are building a non-acidic fence, or they have already built and extinguish the tunnels. So, at least Egyptians should be added to the Jews for the sake of justice.
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      , here are the locals and cut them,

      To be honest, I did not understand this "intifada" request Especially when they rush at the soldiers, who generally are there, well, judging by the frames of the video, they always go with weapons. It’s more like some kind of open house day in a madhouse, or some kind of action to work out changes in mental consciousness in field trials. It’s all not clear,
      Quote: Das Boot
      . And why - a knife? What is the background of the choice of weapons?

      In-in, like revive the Jewish experience of the times of Rome? Well, with the then "sicarii" that rushed to the legionnaires?
      Quote: 740
      The Jews are outraged by the lack of eggs among their rulers, and in particular Beni. Some urge all Arabs in the area to crush tanks.

      Horseradish knows him, but maybe it’s really possible, they want to pump Israel into a large-scale rally through the house? Saudis were thrust into Yemen and they are not childishly raking there, now it would be nice to connect Israel, and the others will catch up with it, well, the Jordanians are different, the Egyptians ....
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 10: 10
        Quote: avt
        then, in general, the Egyptians are building a non-acidic fence, or have already built and extinguish the tunnels.

        The tunnels are gone, the reservoirs are flooded. And from the Egyptian side all the frontier houses were demolished.
        1. -8
          28 October 2015 10: 24
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The tunnels are gone, the reservoirs are flooded. And from the Egyptian side all the frontier houses were demolished.

          Bibi should take lessons from Sisi in the fight against terrorism.
          1. +5
            28 October 2015 13: 00
            Again, all this is happening primarily due to the fact that Israel continues to occupy the Palestinian lands and literally squeezes the Arabs with the rest of their land.
            And then he also "cries" - where does terrorism come from, attacks on Jews and hatred of Arabs.
            In the center of Jaffa, Jews oust Arabs from Palestinian neighborhoods
      2. +11
        28 October 2015 10: 15
        Quote: avt
        To be honest, I did not understand this "intifada" Especially when they throw themselves at the soldiers, who are there, well, judging by the footage of the video, they are constantly walking around with weapons. It's more like some kind of open day in a madhouse, or what then an action to work out changes in mental consciousness in field trials. As it is not clear,

        Here are exactly the same thoughts with me that they put out this fool with a knife correctly and did it, but this is not an isolated case, the palms have fallen off the reels, grabbed the knives and rush at the armed soldiers en masse.
        1. +4
          28 October 2015 10: 25
          All this is inflated on religious grounds. Enough in the world of jihad lovers.
          1. +2
            28 October 2015 11: 08
            they’ll start soon and jump on a tank with a knife, though they sniff dope you see
            1. +2
              28 October 2015 11: 39
              Young people are pumped up with propaganda foolishness, 14-26 years old, the body is there and physical strength is already there, but the brain has not grown. Here are those and the firing meat is recruited. And they will jump on the tank, cry, fight, with fear, but jump, because the warrior of jihad has no way back. Like that crying suicide bomber in Syria on the BRDM with a bomb under the train.
              1. +2
                28 October 2015 12: 26
                Yes, instead of teaching the FILYSTIN schoolchildren the good, the eternal, and the beautiful, they are taught to hate the Jews. And this is the root of the problem.
                1. +2
                  28 October 2015 12: 45
                  Quote: miru mir
                  Yes, instead of teaching the FILYSTIN schoolchildren the good, the eternal, and the beautiful, they are taught to hate the Jews. And this is the root of the problem.

                  The root of the problem is that, knowing this, Israel has not taken any steps to fundamentally change the situation.
                  1. +1
                    28 October 2015 12: 49
                    It is truth too. This is the business of politicians. And with us, this is not very. It's my personal opinion.
                    1. 0
                      28 October 2015 13: 17
                      Quote: miru mir
                      It is truth too. This is the business of politicians. And with us, this is not very. It's my personal opinion.

                      Politics is the business of everyone. It's my opinion. To write off everything to individuals is not correct in my opinion. hi
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2015 13: 30
                        The same is true - we choose politicians. But the politicians of the FILISTINS are chosen by the FILISTINIAN Arabs. And both sides are involved in the confrontation.
                      2. +1
                        28 October 2015 15: 38
                        Quote: miru mir
                        But the politicians of the FILISTINS are chosen by the FILISTINIAN Arabs.

                        Yes it is. But what to do in such a situation?
                      3. +3
                        28 October 2015 16: 50
                        I do not know. I know one thing, in the east, concessions are taken for weakness. The troops and civilians withdrew from the gas, chewed the first rocket from there, received hundreds of rockets and incessant terror, impoverished the Arab population, earning by digging terror tunnels and other outrages. And twenty years ago we went to visit each other.
                      4. +4
                        28 October 2015 16: 58
                        Quote: miru mir
                        I do not know. I know one thing, in the east, concessions are taken for weakness. The troops and civilians withdrew from the gas, chewed the first rocket from there, received hundreds of rockets and incessant terror, impoverished the Arab population, earning by digging terror tunnels and other outrages. And twenty years ago we went to visit each other.

                        I completely agree on Gaza, I consider our withdrawal of settlements and troops to be a huge mistake. Palestinians worked in kibbutzim and made good money. And now I go to fight there almost every year, not only do our politicians know how to start a war and it’s not possible to bring them to completion, then they Obama interferes with the iron dome is too good. So we live. negative
                2. +7
                  28 October 2015 14: 00
                  Dear miru mir! Here the Professor was offended by the distortion of the names of nationalities and derivatives there ... Could you, first, set an example and stop insulting your enemies. I would be very grateful. I am sure that most of the points on this site share my point of view ...
                  Unless of course, only this is not the goal itself.
                  1. +1
                    28 October 2015 14: 25
                    Dear BARKHAN! I have no idea to offend any nationality. If you mean the word FILYSTIN, then this is not at all an insult to the Arab people, as the FYLYSTIN Arabs have called themselves since 1968. I call them out of habit.
                    Best regards hi
                3. 0
                  28 October 2015 17: 15
                  Quote: miru mir
                  Yeah, instead of teaching the FILYSTIN schoolchildren the good, the eternal and the beautiful, they are taught to hate the Jews

                  Or maybe Jews in Israel are taught to hate Arabs and not only Arabs by instilling in them that they are "the center of the earth"?
                  1. +1
                    28 October 2015 17: 28
                    In state Israeli schools, Israeli Israelis, Arabs, Circassians, Druze, Russians, etc., study in the same classes. Two Arab girls from the city of Ramle studied with my daughter. One Orthodox Christian, another Muslim. Such things, mahmud.
                    1. 0
                      28 October 2015 17: 42
                      Quote: miru mir
                      In state Israeli schools, Israelis - Jews, Arabs, Circassians, Druze, Russians, etc. - study in the same classes

                      Well, you know how to lie well, I still understood it when you were EGOR65 smile
                      But it would be better to call me a quilted jacket because I have the same nickname right?
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2015 17: 54
                        Lying is yours, though it’s not good at all. All your lies are easily exposed.
                      2. 0
                        28 October 2015 18: 26
                        Quote: miru mir
                        All your lies are easily exposed.

                        Are you in the role of the "whistleblower"? Don't make people laugh laughing
          2. +2
            28 October 2015 12: 15
            You know this very well! Jews have taken terror into service since time immemorial (remember Zhelyabov, Perovskaya, and other prolific revolutionaries, red, orange, blue ...). In terms of terror, Jews will give anyone a head start in a hundred points, respectively, and in counterterrorism.
            But, apparently, the Palestinians are good students.
        2. +2
          28 October 2015 21: 20
          Quote: vovanpain
          Here are exactly the same thoughts with me that they put out this fool with a knife correctly and did it, but this is not an isolated case, the palms have fallen off the reels, grabbed the knives and rush at the armed soldiers en masse.

          They are pressed with the help of Islam. They are sure that having died this way with a knife, you become a Shaid, with all the consequences.
    3. -11
      28 October 2015 10: 07
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      the concentration camp was made from Palestine, here are the locals and they are being cut, gentlemen Jews, at least go wild, but Israel, along with the United States and European litter, are the main terrorists in the world

      Do you know that in a number of ways the standard of living in the Palestinian Authority is higher than in Russia?
      1. +5
        28 October 2015 10: 11
        Quote: Pimply

        Do you know that in a number of ways the standard of living in the Palestinian Authority is higher than in Russia?

        So you don’t need to do nichrome, you don’t need to work, get loot from the whole teary world and the fuck of numerous wives. Paradise is not otherwise.
        1. +4
          28 October 2015 10: 43
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Pimply

          Do you know that in a number of ways the standard of living in the Palestinian Authority is higher than in Russia?

          So you don’t need to do nichrome, you don’t need to work, get loot from the whole teary world and the fuck of numerous wives. Paradise is not otherwise.

          Yes, and in whose economy are the money received by the Palestinians pouring in? The more Palestinians cry, the more money they are given, the more the Israeli economy gets. Therefore, it is not beneficial for the Jews that the Palestinians would calm down. Just one of the divorce schemes of the world community. smile
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 11: 28
            Quote: Frigate
            The more Palestinians cry, the more money they are given, the more Israeli economy gets

            How is this? what
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 11: 16
        about the standard of living not vkurse, but with the brains there is a complete "Schwein"
      3. +3
        28 October 2015 11: 41
        Do you know that in a number of ways the standard of living in the Palestinian Authority is higher than in Russia?


        Here is a typical Jewish post. For which they are then minuscule and swear all possible and impossible. Lets say that the Jews to the Palestinians have set up a PARADISE on earth (well, she visited Shiz, like those Palestinians with knives). Well, for a moment. Can't you say this in a normal way? Without again hitting feelings, no, you definitely need to kick Russia. And then they try to say something about a biased attitude towards Jews.
    4. 0
      28 October 2015 10: 10
      Write nonsense. Is this a concentration camp?
      1. +7
        28 October 2015 10: 13
        Quote: miru mir
        Write nonsense. Is this a concentration camp?

        I wonder why this roller coaster is painted in the colors of the Armenian flag. what
        1. +7
          28 October 2015 10: 16
          Quote: andj61
          I wonder why this roller coaster is painted in the colors of the Armenian flag.

          1. They did not know that it was the Armenian flag.
          2. They do not know that the state of Armenia exists.
        2. +1
          28 October 2015 10: 28
          And figs knows him smile By the way, my neighbor made these slides. With us, they are also poked around in all water parks.
          1. +3
            28 October 2015 11: 54
            Here you go!
            So it’s they you poked!
            And in the photo - right Palestine! They immediately recognized everything right away by looking at the photo!
            Personally, I immediately exclaimed: "This is Palestine!"
            laughing
            1. +1
              28 October 2015 12: 29
              Try to use Google.
              1. +5
                28 October 2015 12: 32
                Quote: miru mir
                Try to use Google.

                In Egypt, I saw Arab women bathing and "sunbathing" in abayas. How they slide down the hills in this - I can't imagine.
          2. +4
            28 October 2015 14: 04
            And everywhere are Armenian flags? wink
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 14: 26
              Yes, something did not pay attention laughing These slides of varying difficulty are convenient when they are of different colors.
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 10: 21
        Quote: miru mir
        Write nonsense. Is this a concentration camp?

        Wouldn't "miru mir" be so kind to tell us all about how, why and for what purpose Palestinian water wells are being destroyed!
        1. +1
          28 October 2015 11: 33
          I will not, I'm not in the subject. Judging by the numerous forgeries of the FILYSTINS, the same shnyaga.
          1. -1
            28 October 2015 13: 46
            Quote: miru mir
            Judging by the numerous forgeries of the FILYSTINS, the same shnyaga.

            As far as I understand? and the ruined houses of the Palestinians are nonsense too. And you, a young man, are not trained to speak in ordinary literary language. Thieves' jargon - forever! Although this is jargon in Russia, the Jews have ordinary speech. Is not it?
            1. -1
              28 October 2015 14: 32
              The ruined houses of FILYSTIN terrorists, let me notice. You seem to have praised Ramzan Kadyrov for similar actions.
              Don't you think that you give my person excessive attention? Can’t you go without personality? I assure you, I do not need you as a teacher.
              1. 0
                28 October 2015 15: 34
                Quote: miru mir
                I assure you, I don’t need you as a teacher

                It's up to me, not you, dear. Whoever you are assigned will learn from. It’s another matter if I want to teach you such people. In order not to hear after: You set me off because I am anti-Semite and apple! laughing
                1. +2
                  28 October 2015 16: 53
                  Regarding me personally, you absolutely have nothing to decide. I’ll figure it out myself. And, if it does not bother you, let's not get personal, but back to the article.
      3. -1
        28 October 2015 10: 51
        look at the territory of the Jews and Palestine, as they have changed in proportion over the past half century, quietly squeezing Arabs with honest eyes ... angels are right, where to go
      4. +3
        28 October 2015 11: 25
        An uninhabited camp, but about brains I answered a little higher. If the loot falls from the sky, then from idleness you will begin any x ..? to suffer.
        1. +1
          28 October 2015 12: 30
          Well, like this. Starving Volga.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 13: 17
            Quote: miru mir
            Well, like this. Starving Volga.

            And the most interesting thing is that there is nothing else on the tray except for "grass", that is, vegetables and fruits smile
            And in Palestine, however, as in Israel, thanks to the mild climate and almost "eternal" summer, two or three harvests a year are harvested, this is not Russia where it is winter for six months.
            So your photo only says that poor Arabs eat mainly greens, the cheapest product in those parts.
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 13: 33
              Quote: quilted jacket
              So your photo only says that poor Arabs eat mainly greens, the cheapest product in those parts.

              ))) Post meat rows? As you were, mahmud, biased and biased, you stayed the same. The proverb about the grave and the rich dress perfectly on you.
              1. -1
                28 October 2015 17: 22
                Quote: miru mir
                Post meat rows?

                Let's post it really want to look at their "market" and compare with ours.
                Quote: miru mir
                The proverb about the grave and the rich dress perfectly on you.

                Oh, don’t worry about people like you, there are a lot of very good and true proverbs lol
                1. 0
                  28 October 2015 17: 55
                  Write in Arabic-meat rows of gases, for example, and admire.
                  1. -1
                    28 October 2015 18: 19
                    Quote: miru mir
                    Write in Arabic-meat rows of gases, for example, and admire.

                    You're lying again? This photo is from this site and it is from Egypt and even on the eve of the holiday the article speaks about the concern of the provincial administration in the trade in raw meat, which can be dangerous in terms of bacteria.
                    http://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/808878
                    1. +1
                      28 October 2015 18: 35
                      http://safa.ps/post/123090/%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AE%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B6-%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%
                      B9%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%85-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D8
                      %A3%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D8%BA%D8%B2%D8%A9
                      Anyone inserts a link address and sees the gas markets laughing Moreover, if you wish, anyone can translate. And you are pushing me about lies. I used to go to gas to buy mutton; it’s three times cheaper there.
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2015 18: 38
                        Quote: miru mir
                        http://safa.ps/post/123090/%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AE%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B6-%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%

                        B9%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%85-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D8

                        %A3%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D8%BA%D8%B2%D8%A9


                        400 Bad Request
                      2. +1
                        28 October 2015 18: 51
                        http://paltimes.net/thumb.php?src=uploads//images/d39bb5e10452c9860a194f2eb5fbd0
                        71.jpg & w = 780

                        Paste in the address bar. Understand - I do not make sense to post fairy tales, like mahmud-quilted jacket smile If the FYLYSTIN leadership were friends with their heads, we would live in friendship, and not grieve.
                      3. +1
                        28 October 2015 19: 11
                        Quote: miru mir
                        Understand - I do not make sense to post fairy tales

                        How does it make no sense? belay
                        You are a lover of "lying" smile
                        Quote: miru mir
                        If the FYLYSTIN leadership were friends with their heads, we would live in friendship, and not grieve.

                        That is, you want them to be your "slaves". Don't you take on a lot? Living with the topic of who took your home and kills your children in the world is now unrealistic.
                        And stop distorting the name of the people of Palestinians, no one here calls for example Jews with the letter "Zh" although this is a common word in Poland.
                      4. +2
                        28 October 2015 19: 21
                        I don't need slaves. It is your fellow believers who have created new slave markets. All wars of the Middle East are tied to Islamic fundamentalism. And you, mahmud, have a hand in this.
                      5. -1
                        28 October 2015 19: 51
                        Quote: miru mir
                        I don't need slaves

                        Perhaps, after all, "people" like you prefer to kill and preferably women, children and the elderly, because they are weaker and will not resist.

                        Quote: miru mir
                        And you, mahmud, have a hand in this.

                        What are you? I’m just against terrorism, both Jewish and Muslim.
                        And I repeat again about those Jews with machine guns that are running in fear from an Arab with a leg.
                        Heroes laughing
                        IDF will verify the reason for the flight of servicemen from a terrorist in Be'er Sheva
                        The IDF command will begin an investigation into military personnel who escaped from a terrorist at the Beer Sheva bus station on October 18, despite the fact that they had weapons.
                        http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/novosti1/2015/10/21/cahal-nedovolen-povedeniem-sold
                        at-vo-vremya-terakta /
                      6. +1
                        28 October 2015 21: 36
                        Are you mahmud, a brave couch warrior, ever been on sight? I think it’s unlikely. But ordinary Jews are bold and cowardly, wise and stupid.
                        About the killing, and targeted, of children and women, your little brothers, FILYSTINS hold primacy. Your Muslim jihat, among the fooled Alah-bahabah proclaim-like two fingers ...
                        How many Islam warriors cut in Syria?
                      7. -1
                        28 October 2015 22: 53
                        Quote: miru mir
                        But ordinary Jews are bold and cowardly, wise and stupid.


                        "Golden words, Yuri Venediktovich!" (from)

                        I completely agree and subscribe.
                        But the trouble is - there are representatives of your "chosen by God" people who only know how to scream about the Holocaust and demand all sorts of preferences and repentance on this basis, not only now, but, I think, in decades, too. At the same time, forgetting who financed and fed a certain corporal Schicklgruber, who gave him power and allowed him to create everything that he did. If only to create a counterbalance to the USSR-Russia and destroy both the Russians (by Russians in this case I mean all the peoples inhabiting the USSR) and the Germans in a mutual bloody massacre. The names of these "God's chosen" are still on everyone's lips - the numerous banking clans of both old Europe and those who are now called neocons in the New World. Who did not hesitate to trade through neutral countries with those who killed their brothers and co-religionists in the gas chambers.

                        And a little problem has a place to be - if you start talking about it now, you immediately become known as an anti-Semite. "God's Chosen" calculated everything to the smallest detail and for decades to come.

                        Here you can add the numerous fraternity of those who destroyed the Russian Empire - Leiba Bronstein is a vivid example of this. But they say the truth - "the revolution is devouring its children" - and therefore someone smeared their forehead with brilliant green, and who helped with an ice pick.
                        As Joseph Vissarionovich said: "Why should people, whose nationality is 2% of the population, make up 98% of the entire ruling elite of the country?" (not an exact quote, to look too lazy).

                        Personally, I am not an anti-Semite. I am an anti-Zionist. I am against those thanks to whom and for whose money millions of Jews were burned alive in the death camps. Who were and are the very ones - "God's chosen".

                        God be their judge
                      8. +1
                        28 October 2015 23: 22
                        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                        Personally, I am not anti-Semite. I am an anti-Zionist. I am against those thanks to whom and whose money burned millions of Jews alive in death camps

                        Well, porridge in your head laughing
                        You agree that people are different. And the opinions are excellent.
                        And I often hear about the Holocaust not from the Jews, but from their haters. Strange, right? By the way, the goal of Zionism is to gather all the Jews in Israel, that's all. And when one part of you like screams, you need to throw it into Palestine, and the other part blisses-Palestine eats the native-born Arabs, I’m proud of you laughing
                        And to dot everything иRussian by nationality hi
                      9. -2
                        29 October 2015 10: 20
                        Fair?
                        I'm not one of those who yells something there.
                        I don’t give a damn how you live there. This is your internal affair, in fact.

                        And about nationality ... I'm not a nationalist, at least be a Udmurt, at least a Kazakh - it makes no difference hi

                        Threat Zionism-is racism. That's all I wanted to say wink
                      10. 0
                        29 October 2015 14: 31
                        Racism is a set of views based on the provisions on the physical and mental inequality of human races, nations and on the decisive influence of racial differences on history and culture.
                        ---
                        Zionism (Hebrew צִיּוֹנוּת, otsionut - from the name of Mount Zion in Jerusalem) is a political movement whose purpose is to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland - in Israel
                        You are deeply mistaken.
                      11. 0
                        29 October 2015 17: 15
                        Quote: miru mir
                        Racism is a set of views based on the provisions on the physical and mental inequality of human races, nations and on the decisive influence of racial differences on history and culture.
                        ---
                        Zionism (Hebrew צִיּוֹנוּת, otsionut - from the name of Mount Zion in Jerusalem) is a political movement whose purpose is to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland - in Israel
                        You are deeply mistaken.

                        Chet once read that some Zionists did not at all believe that "it is imperative to unite and revive the Jewish people" in their historical homeland - in Israel.
                        A much more serious split occurred in the Zionist movement on the possibility and acceptability of creating a Jewish state outside Eretz-Israel. T. Herzl believed that, in principle, such a state could be based on any territory suitable for this, and preferred Eretz Yisrael only in connection with its special spiritual significance (and, therefore, attractiveness) for the Jewish people.
                  2. 0
                    28 October 2015 18: 25
                    Quote: miru mir
                    meat rows gases

                    I typed in Russian "meat ranks of the gas sector" - even gave the following:
                    http://ru.euronews.com/2015/07/08/gaza-0-percent-rebuilt-one-year-after-operatio
                    n-protective-edge /
                    1. +1
                      28 October 2015 18: 44
                      Gaza in ruins, after rocket attacks on Israeli territory, everything is right. The same picture in Lebanon, after the shelling of Israel by Hezbollah. And Grozny, after the bombing, looked the same. Points of terror destroyed.
                      And in the picture, the bazaar is in the gas.
      5. +2
        28 October 2015 11: 43
        Write nonsense. Is this a concentration camp?


        And ... where can it be seen that this is Palestine?
        1. -2
          28 October 2015 12: 31
          Quote: alicante11
          And ... where can it be seen that this is Palestine?

          http://pavel-slob.livejournal.com/423392.html
          1. +2
            28 October 2015 12: 42
            Quote: miru mir
            http://pavel-slob.livejournal.com/423392.html

            We have bloggers who make a picture from North Korea.
            This is especially surprising for this blogger "who want only good for those who do not believe in their pedophile prophet."
            1. -1
              28 October 2015 12: 51
              Doubted that the pictures from the gases, I provided the source hi
              1. +2
                28 October 2015 13: 08
                Doubted that the pictures from the gases, I provided the source


                By what signs can I understand that this is Gaza, and not, say, Egypt or Saudi Arabia with Qatar? You can write anything on the web.
                1. +1
                  28 October 2015 13: 40
                  And to ask Google, for example, the city of Umm al-Fahm or the gas parks, is not fate?
                  1. 0
                    28 October 2015 14: 02
                    Hmmm, hard, how does this picture connect "parks and gases" with other photos? I understand that there should be recognizable moments, at least flags or other distinctive features of the Palestinian Authority. Although, of course, everything can be added in Photoshop, but at least it will be possible to poke at a specific detail, which suggests that it is Gaza and the Palestinians are blissful there.
                    1. -2
                      28 October 2015 14: 34
                      Ndaaa ... I don’t even know how to please you. laughing You come to Israel, but look with your own eyes.
                2. +1
                  28 October 2015 14: 35
                  Quote: alicante11
                  By what signs can I understand that this is Gaza, and not, say, Egypt or Saudi Arabia with Qatar? You can write anything on the web.

                  Let's just say - what concrete evidence that these are photographs from Gaza do you find convincing?
      6. T34
        +1
        28 October 2015 13: 29
        Moreover, the Jews make a shekel on this.
  4. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 52
    Yeah. They are not trained to act with a butt. Why shoot ??? And interrogate?
    1. +6
      28 October 2015 10: 04
      Quote: A-Sim
      Why shoot ??

      It’s interesting that you would write if such a thing happened with us. Probably right, you can’t attack a soldier with a knife, but since many Jews are talking about Jews.
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 10: 47
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: A-Sim
        Why shoot ??

        It’s interesting that you would write if such a thing happened with us. Probably right, you can’t attack a soldier with a knife, but since many Jews are talking about Jews.

        You were constantly moaning what Palestinian animals are attacking the civilian population, they say they are afraid of the military, they say cowards. Now they are attacking the military, you are again not happy.
    2. avt
      0
      28 October 2015 10: 09
      Quote: A-Sim
      . They are not trained to act with a butt.

      But what? M-16 / M-4? Yes, the barrel will fly off - it’s not a trilinear and not a Kalash laughing
      M16 - You would rather die than smash your expensive rifle in hand-to-hand combat

      AK47 - with your assault rifle you can beat off well in hand-to-hand fighting

      Three-ruler - Your rifle is a cool spear with the ability to shoot
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 10: 36
        Yes, I remember there was a joke in the army, reloading AKM on the floor. The linoleum was torn, it’s burnt to the machine, it didn’t even blather.
        1. +4
          28 October 2015 11: 08
          Quote: keel 31
          there was a joke in the army

          It was not a joke. In those years, when the fighters finished their three-year service and the two-year service began, there was an army competition called "Duel". Five people on each side, start to the trenches, firing positions. The task of each team is to hit five enemy targets. The hit target and in the neighboring team the fighter with this number is eliminated. If you hit your target, you have the right to another "live" target. The team that will deal with the targets earlier wins.
          So, it was there, in the fall, with the blow of the butt on the wall of the trench that the first cartridge was sent. And say - a joke. No jokes! Want to live, know how to spin!
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 11: 50
            There was a joke for us. Nobody taught us to reload on the wall of the trench. We were just fooling around. And they fell asleep sand and shot at the rail. hi
    3. +2
      28 October 2015 11: 31
      What a butt, I’d better write 100 explanatory notes than I will rot in the ground. They’ll do it right, but they will analyze the situation later.
    4. T34
      -1
      28 October 2015 13: 43
      Jews hit the knee with the butt.
      like in the ghetto in general

      http://my.mail.ru/mail/5love_agape/video/567/571.html
  5. 740
    +7
    28 October 2015 09: 52
    On kosher sites, mother’s panic is not grieving, it’s understandable. Jews are outraged by the lack of eggs from their rulers and Beni in particular. Some call on all Arabs in the area to crush tanks. soldier
  6. jjj
    +2
    28 October 2015 09: 52
    And in the UN picture
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 09: 55
      Quote: jjj
      And in the UN picture

      and judging by his face - he likes it)
  7. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 53
    Well, it would seem - an ordinary episode for Israel and ordinary news. But the comments, I think, will reach the degree of "murdered Palestinian babies" and "Stalin gave the Jews a country ...". And why a knife? What is the rationale behind the choice of weapons? Was the "War of stones", now - the war of knives?
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 09: 58
      Quote: Das Boot
      And why - a knife?

      Not from a big mind. The probability of killing someone is not great, but it is guaranteed to die himself. The one who thought of attacking them with a knife obviously works for the Jews, for in this way all desperate and unbalanced Palestinians themselves identify and destroy themselves.
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 10: 09
        Quote: Mera Joota
        guaranteed to die yourself.

        well, not always. Guaranteed to go into the category of martyrs easier, weighed C4. Maybe there are any interpretations of the Qur'an or Sunnah? Muslim zombiprop? As the Hamas godfather from Gaza said - A new weapon of our people, such as 16-year-old heroes with knives.
      2. -7
        28 October 2015 10: 12
        Here are those on. The soldiers of Islam work for the Jews ???
      3. +1
        28 October 2015 11: 49
        Not from a big mind. The probability of killing someone is not great, but it is guaranteed to die himself. The one who thought of attacking them with a knife obviously works for the Jews, for in this way all desperate and unbalanced Palestinians themselves identify and destroy themselves.


        Yes, I just got stuck with drugs and forward to the guria.
    2. +1
      28 October 2015 09: 58
      Quote: Das Boot
      And why - a knife?

      Not from a big mind. The probability of killing someone is not great, but it is guaranteed to die himself. The one who thought of attacking them with a knife obviously works for the Jews, for in this way all desperate and unbalanced Palestinians themselves identify and destroy themselves.
    3. Fox
      +1
      28 October 2015 10: 01
      Quote: Das Boot
      . And why - a knife?

      Yes, everything is simple: the knife is put into the hand of ANY shot, and voila! ... you have already legitimately used a weapon. Something like that. And now let them refute it.
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 10: 13
        Quote: Fox
        the knife is embedded in the hand of ANY shot

        Bgyyy ... And even the videos are not able to convince you laughing
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 10: 19
          Quote: miru mir
          . And even the videos are not able to convince you

          He is a former opera wink
          1. -3
            28 October 2015 10: 30
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            He is a former opera

            Im-50% discount wink
        2. +2
          28 October 2015 11: 31
          Quote: miru mir
          Quote: Fox
          the knife is embedded in the hand of ANY shot

          Bgyyy ... And even the videos are not able to convince you laughing

          That's really why they attack with knives? Despite the saturation of the Middle East with fire arrows, what is the point?
      2. +3
        28 October 2015 10: 18
        Quote: Fox

        Yes, everything is simple: the knife is put into the hand of ANY shot, and voila !.

        LIS, even before you yourself said that you were a former opera. I myself guessed this from your comments, don’t you know why?
        1. Fox
          0
          28 October 2015 17: 41
          well done. take a pie from the shelf)))) and get rid of guesses ...
    4. +2
      28 October 2015 10: 04
      ". And why exactly - a knife? What is the rationale for choosing a weapon? There was a" War of stones ", now - a war of knives?

      As long as civilization error continues in Canaan, the creation of the state of Israel in the land of Palestine, any wars will be possible.
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 10: 31
        Quote: aleksfill
        the creation of the state of Israel in the land of Palestine

        Do you know the origin of the word Palestine?
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 12: 03
        If, in simple terms, this is so, the more Palestinians are shot with a knife, the more kipesh and all the crap in the future. Apparently they do not need peace, as they say "x ... publicity.
    5. +4
      28 October 2015 11: 02
      Quote: Das Boot
      Well, it would seem - an ordinary episode for Israel and ordinary news. But the comments, I think, will reach the degree of "murdered Palestinian babies" and "Stalin gave the Jews a country ...". And why a knife? What is the rationale behind the choice of weapons? Was the "War of stones", now - the war of knives?

      I’ll try to answer, on the west bank Shabak is very strong, they listen to the phones of crowds of informants, so it’s problematic to publish any serious terrorist attack. As you know, stopping a spontaneous attack is very difficult, but finding something more serious than a knife or an ax is not easy under such conditions. Therefore, terrorists appear in cars crushing people and terrorists with knives.
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 11: 57
        Quote: Hello
        Quote: Das Boot
        Well, it would seem - an ordinary episode for Israel and ordinary news. But the comments, I think, will reach the degree of "murdered Palestinian babies" and "Stalin gave the Jews a country ...". And why a knife? What is the rationale behind the choice of weapons? Was the "War of stones", now - the war of knives?

        I’ll try to answer, on the west bank Shabak is very strong, they listen to the phones of crowds of informants, so it’s problematic to publish any serious terrorist attack. As you know, stopping a spontaneous attack is very difficult, but finding something more serious than a knife or an ax is not easy under such conditions. Therefore, terrorists appear in cars crushing people and terrorists with knives.

        Strange, missiles are being launched, but firearms are hard to find? Syria is not far from there, and a bunch of weapons should be brought from there. And every Hamas has a lot of weapons. Maybe this is a "fashion" for knives, as before for stones?
        1. +3
          28 October 2015 12: 09
          Quote: Your friend
          Strange, missiles are fired, and is it difficult to find a firearm?

          You are confusing the West Bank and the gas sector.
          Quote: Your friend
          Yes, and all Hamas weapons are full

          Hamas is certainly full of weapons, the main task is to transfer weapons to the performer, and here Shabak gets to his full height. No one knows for sure who is leaking information, but the facts are that there are dozens that didn’t reach even the transfer of weapons per successful attack. the more people aware of the action, the higher the risk. Therefore, there are a lot of spontaneous acts of terrorism, that is, conditional Ahmed got up in the morning and decided to kill the Israelis, there is practically nothing to catch Shabak here.
          1. +3
            28 October 2015 12: 26
            Quote: Hello
            Quote: Your friend
            Strange, missiles are fired, and is it difficult to find a firearm?

            You are confusing the West Bank and the gas sector.
            Quote: Your friend
            Yes, and all Hamas weapons are full

            Hamas is certainly full of weapons, the main task is to transfer weapons to the performer, and here Shabak gets to his full height. No one knows for sure who is leaking information, but the facts are that there are dozens that didn’t reach even the transfer of weapons per successful attack. the more people aware of the action, the higher the risk. Therefore, there are a lot of spontaneous acts of terrorism, that is, conditional Ahmed got up in the morning and decided to kill the Israelis, there is practically nothing to catch Shabak here.

            No, I do not confuse. I’m just saying that the weapon is nearby, there should not be any problems finding it. It just seems to me that using a knife seems delusional. Some idiocy rush to the military in body armor with a knife. I do not understand what they are guided by.
            1. +4
              28 October 2015 12: 52
              Quote: Your friend
              Some idiocy rush to the military in body armor with a knife. I do not understand what they are guided by.

              I think about the same thing as bearded hares from other organizations are guided by, simply there are fewer opportunities. If they have the opportunity, they will go joyfully with a firearm and with bombs.
          2. +3
            28 October 2015 21: 31
            Quote: Hello
            No one knows for sure who is leaking information, but the facts are such that several dozens of successful attacks have not even reached the transfer of weapons.

            At the beginning of the 700s, statistics reached 2 prevented terrorist attacks per year, that is, 12 every day. When I was serving, they lifted a whole district to my ears, as there was information about the successful smuggling of several SVD. Found in XNUMX hours.
      2. +5
        28 October 2015 13: 05
        Quote: Hello
        Shabak, they listen to the phones they have a crowd of informants so it is problematic to publish any serious attack. As you know, stopping a spontaneous attack is very difficult, but finding something more serious than a knife or an ax is not easy under such conditions. Therefore, terrorists appear in cars crushing people and terrorists with knives.

        Thank you, Ilya. Yes, everything is simple) And I already rushed into the sacred meaning to look for ....
  8. 0
    28 October 2015 09: 58
    The Palestinians create their army, arm. Israel has a right to exist, Palestine too. There are borders that were determined by the UN during the creation of Israel in 1947. And refugees must be returned, property and land returned to them. Then there will be peace.
    1. +4
      28 October 2015 10: 06
      Quote: RuslanNN
      The Palestinians create their army, arm. Israel has a right to exist, Palestine too.

      True, only Palestine does not want to create its own state, as this is not surprising for you.
      As for weapons, you have few bearded scumbags running around the world?
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 12: 31
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        True, only Palestine does not want to create its own state, as this is not surprising for you.


        Did the Palestinians tell you this? Or is this your personal conclusion? You need to browse the Internet! For example, to read what the Palestinian leader intended to declare at the UNGA session.
    2. -7
      28 October 2015 10: 15
      Borders have already changed and refugees have moved to another world.
    3. -5
      28 October 2015 10: 17
      Palestine lost its right to exist, losing to the Jews in the 1948 war of the year. Is this surprising to you?
      1. +4
        28 October 2015 11: 04
        Palestine did not fight with Israel in 1948, there was no Palestine.
        1. T34
          -3
          28 October 2015 13: 37
          and israel too!
          they all crouched on the ears that supposedly the Jews had supernormal powers among them, etc.
          it’s just not clear why they still don’t have their own home.
          I do not trust Jews, my grandmother taught from childhood.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 14: 05
            Well, half of all scientific theories were invented by a Jew, why not trust here?
          2. 0
            28 October 2015 15: 31
            Quote: T34
            and israel too!

            Exactly so. By the way, Israel respect the language with a capital letter. I remind you that by decision of the UN Mandate Palestine was to be divided into 2 parts. Arabs did not recognize the UN decision; Jews recognized, I also remind you that the occupation of the Arab part was carried out by Jordan and Egypt before In 1967, the Arab part of Palestine was under them, I note that neither Jordan nor Egypt did anything to create an independent Palestine, they annexed these lands to their states. In 1967, during the 6 day war, these lands were captured by Israel. The question arises of who owes these lands Israel and should it at all? By the way, I note that Jordan and Egypt have no such claims on these lands.
          3. +1
            28 October 2015 16: 49
            Quote: T34
            I do not trust Jews, my grandmother taught from childhood.

            Well, grandmother was right. Jews, in fact, never denied this laughing And what, by the way, did she say about the "brothers" and other "ours", including (oh-you-well-hospadi!) Uh..e, let's say - the Ukrainian people?
          4. +2
            28 October 2015 22: 09
            And about the Arabs, your dear grandmother, of course, said granddaughter, our brothers Arabs laughing
        2. -1
          28 October 2015 14: 39
          I agree, but since the Arabs attacked and received a return, it would be strange that they were now allowed back, no? And 50 years passed, the heirs did not appear and the land is now state.
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 11: 52
        Palestine lost its right to exist, losing to the Jews in the 1948 war of the year. Is this surprising to you?


        Cool announcement. Tomorrow we will send troops to Germany, Eastern Europe, France, Finland, Manchuria, didn’t anyone forget from those who once lost to us?
        1. -3
          28 October 2015 14: 07
          And we still haven’t returned the territory of Finland to them - Vyborg-Viipuri, Zelenogorsk - Teriyoki - all this is the former land of the Chukhons - a surprise, huh? Like Kaliningrad, by the way)))
          1. 0
            29 October 2015 11: 52
            Quote: Maksus
            Vyborg-Viipuri, Zelenogorsk - Teriyoki - all this is the former land of the Chukhons - a surprise, huh?

            not Chukhons, but Finns.
            In its current form, it’s not Vyborg, not Zelenogorsk, they don’t need it at all. It will restore expensively. lol You must admit that the gloomy, near-standing Lappeenranta looks much more preferable.
  9. +3
    28 October 2015 10: 01
    According to the UN declaration, two states should be created - Palestine and Israel. But the Israelis have knocked to the right place the United States, they have taken away Palestine and they have been doing there half a century whatever they want. This war will not end until Israel gives Palestine freedom ... But the bundle is already so tight that even free Palestine will not be able to forgive Arab boys tied to Israeli patrol cars (so that they will not shoot).
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 10: 10
      The Israelis, yeah, right after the Jewish state was announced, who attacked whom? And then self-defense. After the war of territories, Russia added, who would not?
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 10: 55
        Quote: Maksus
        The Israelis, yeah, right after the Jewish state was announced, who attacked whom? And then self-defense. After the war of territories, Russia added, who would not?

        Uninvited guests break into your apartment, occupy your living room and declare it their property. You are trying to drive them out, but they give you and your wife and children in the head. And then they scream at the whole yard that they were attacked.
        1. +1
          28 October 2015 11: 36
          Read the description of these places by Mark Twain.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 16: 18
            Quote: miru mir
            Read the description of these places by Mark Twain.

            I agree with almost everything that you wrote in this thread. But this picture is stupid. On the same basis, you can take a picture of Chita and write "Buryatovud exposed - Buryats claim to have lived here for a thousand years ..."
            1. +1
              28 October 2015 18: 59
              The vast majority of Arabs, however, as well as Jews, appeared on this deserted land as a result of emigration in the 18-19 centuries.
              1. +2
                28 October 2015 19: 16
                Quote: miru mir
                The vast majority of Arabs, however, as well as Jews, appeared on this deserted land as a result of emigration in the 18-19 centuries.

                This does not cancel the delusional picture. According to the Jews, Israel was a desert land, according to others, who refer to the Turkish census - "In 1800 the population of Palestine did not exceed 300 thousand, 5 thousand of whom were Jews (mainly Sephardic)."
                1. 0
                  28 October 2015 19: 41
                  That's it, only Mirolyub stubbornly does not notice these numbers
                2. 0
                  28 October 2015 21: 40
                  You fully read this article. But I do not argue, then there was a predominance of Arabs who arrived in search of work from nearby Arab countries.
        2. +1
          28 October 2015 14: 07
          Arabs broke in, no?
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 13: 15
        Does this fact cancel the UN decision? This fact obliges the Palestinians to live under the Israelis? Not. The fact of the attack is obvious, but it is also clear that no one wanted to follow in a peaceful way. And now it has become a slaughterhouse.
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 14: 08
          Quote: East Wind
          This fact cancels the decision of the UN

          Firstly, it was not a decision, but a recommendation.
          Secondly, people with Israeli citizenship can renounce citizenship without interference and live happily and happily in Jordan, etc. Yes, in the same Rammale or gas, after all, she’s not under the israelis
          And thirdly, Israel has repeatedly tried to follow a peaceful path. The last time was the "peace agreement" in Oslo, after which the Israeli streets were swept by a wave of Philistine terror.
          1. 0
            28 October 2015 14: 44
            Yes, stop calling them the Philistines - what a primitive hatred, this world will not come. And, since the UN is only a "recommendation", then my words are worth the same and ... Stop this nonsense, these territories will not become yours, they will not bring income.
            1. +1
              29 October 2015 11: 59
              Quote: East Wind
              Yes stop calling them FILYSTINS

              Why else ... for example, you do not know from your illiteracy that the word Palestine is in Arabic, and it sounds like FILYSTYN. Unexpected, huh? smile
              1. -1
                29 October 2015 12: 25
                Quote: MACCABI-TLV
                Quote: East Wind
                Yes stop calling them FILYSTINS

                Why else ... for example, you do not know from your illiteracy that the word Palestine is in Arabic, and it sounds like FILYSTYN. Unexpected, huh? smile

                We write here in Russian, not in Arabic. Themselves correct - "not Chukhontsy, but Finns", and then write such nonsense yourself.
                "because of your illiteracy, you don't know what the word Palestine is in Arabic", this is generally below the plinth (((
                1. 0
                  31 October 2015 11: 24
                  Quote: Your friend
                  We write here in Russian, not in Arabic. You correct yourself - "not Chukhonts, but Finns"

                  And forgive the Chukhites, in what language?
        2. +1
          28 October 2015 16: 01
          All "Palestine" lives on subsidies from Israel, they also receive money in Israel - why the hell to join Hamas and Fatah, if you can stupidly move to Israel and live by the law? So no one needs it, everyone wants Kalash and cash registers. And get money for free from the Jews.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 19: 53
            Quote: Maksus
            Why the hell should you join Hamas and Fatah if you can stupidly move to Israel and live according to the law?

            Who is pushing them. Let them live at home. Only offer tomorrow, they all move tomorrow.
            Here, about 10 years ago, they discussed the possibility of exchanging territories - Jews - to Jews, Arabs - to Arabs.
            Who was the most indignant
            The Lieberman Plan, also known in Israel as the Territory and Population Exchange Plan, was proposed in May 2004 by Avigdor Lieberman, leader of the Israeli NDI party. The plan envisages the exchange of populated areas - territories inhabited by both Arabs and Jews - between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. In July 2000, Raja Aghbariya, a resident of Umm al-Fahm in the "triangle" and leader of Abnaa el-Balad, [8] was interviewed by the Arab weekly Kul al-Arab. Aghbariya said he was "willing to give up the national insurance company and Israeli democracy to unite with the land and people of Palestine." However, this opinion is not shared by the majority of the inhabitants of Umm al-Fahm. [7]
            During the survey, since July 2000, conducted by Kul al-Arab among 1000 residents of Umm al-Fahm, 83% of respondents opposed the idea of ​​transferring their city to Palestinian jurisdiction, while 11% supported this proposal and 6% did not express their position at all . [7] 54% said they were opposed because they wanted to continue living under a democratic regime and enjoy a good standard of living. This includes 18% who said they were satisfied with their current situation, and that they were born in Israel, and that they were not interested in moving to any other state, 14% who said they were not ready to make sacrifices to create Palestinian state, and 11% did not indicate any reason. [7]
        3. +2
          28 October 2015 19: 43
          Quote: East Wind
          Does this fact override the UN decision?

          Google who did not make this decision
          Quote: East Wind
          Does this fact oblige the Palestinians to live under the Israelis?

          No, but where to put them? Do you propose to evict? Or create a state for them?
          Quote: East Wind
          And now it's turned into a slaughter

          Yes, there is no slaughter.
        4. +1
          29 October 2015 11: 56
          Quote: East Wind
          Does this fact override the UN decision?

          guess who did not comply with this decision? wink
    2. -12
      28 October 2015 10: 18
      Look at the FYLystin map in XNUMHs of last year and appreciate the layout.
      1. +2
        28 October 2015 14: 28
        The "carve-up" was also carried out taking into account the population. It was because of the predominant Arab population that the Arabs sought to ensure that the territories allocated to them were proportional to their population. Here is a summary of the population of Palestine by 1800:
        "In 1800, the population of Palestine did not exceed 300 thousands, 25 thousand of whom were Christians, who were very scattered throughout Palestine. The main places of concentration of the Christian population - in Jerusalem, Nazareth and Bethlehem - were controlled by the Orthodox and Catholic churches. Jews (mainly Sephardic) made up 5 thousands and were mainly concentrated in Jerusalem, Safed, Tiberias, and Hebron. The rest of the country's population (about 270 thousand) were мусульмане, almost all are Sunnis "

        That is, Arabs lived there for centuries, Jews at that time fled to Europe (though, there was Rav Hasid, a real Jewish patriot who moved to Palestine in the early 18th century, taking with him about a thousand - two thousand Jews from Europe) - of course, in Europe the climate is much better than in Palestine, and living conditions are better. So here. When it became clear that the Ottoman Empire would soon fall apart when the Russians rammed it from the north and east, and the Austro-Hungarians from the west, then Jewish patriots woke up suddenly and began to organize Zionist conferences. And only from the end of the 19th century Jews began to settle in Palestine, whose ancestors, for some reason, preferred to wander around Europe for centuries, instead of living in their historical Motherland. And later - give, give us our land, bequeathed to us by our God, and all who have lived here for centuries - a suitcase-station-Arab countries. Or sit behind the fence under our control, and shut up. Do you really think that's good? request
        1. -2
          28 October 2015 15: 14
          These lands were empty and lifeless. Arabs reached here during the time of the Turks. In the 18-19 centuries, Arab migration was comparable to Jewish migration.
          1. +3
            28 October 2015 15: 30
            Yeah, who built the Al-Aqsa mosque in the 7th century, Pushkin? But why did the Jews not live on their own land "during the time of the Turks," did the Christians stay there? Or was it better for Jews to live in other parts of the Ottoman Empire, where it was not so "deserted and lifeless"? The Geshefts weren't there? Did you remember your land at the end of the 19th century? request
            1. -1
              28 October 2015 16: 57
              The current mosque was built in the 12 century, if I'm not mistaken. And the Jews lived in Jerusalem always. The fact that their number was small, you're right.
              1. +3
                28 October 2015 17: 16
                You are mistaken - in the 7th century, and not in the 12th. Yes, Jews have always lived in Palestine, but I will remind you the data of 1800 - from 300 000 there were only Jews in Palestine 5000! But your cousins ​​lived 270 000 man. But the main part of your relatives lived in settled, not in "deserted and lifeless" places, as you put it yourself. And at the end of the 19th century, they suddenly began to remember about the land bequeathed by God. By the way, your compatriots had the first clashes with Arab cousins ​​in the 20s of the 20th century - there were orders on the Temple Mount, but the new settlers began to be headstrong there, didn't they?
                1. 0
                  28 October 2015 17: 43
                  And how in two hundred years the number of Arabs has grown 6-7 times? Just like the Jewish emigration. Moreover, Arab emigration was often higher than Jewish.
                  ---
                  Until 1967, the word "Palestinian" was used exclusively to refer to the Jews who inhabited Palestine, since the latter had a culture, language and psychology that distinguished them from Jews in other countries. The Arab inhabitants of Palestine were called Arabs because their language and culture did not differ from the Arabs of the surrounding countries, from where they migrated to Palestine during 1880-1948, a time of rapid development of the region under the influence of British and Jewish capital and Jewish agricultural settlements.
                  Fred Gottail is Professor of Economics at the University of Illinois.
                  1. +2
                    28 October 2015 19: 37
                    Oh, the tricks are already in use - translate arrows smile I do not use the word "Palestinian" - I write "Arabs", "your cousins", etc.

                    How has the number of Arabs grown so many times in 200 years? Yes, it’s easy - it’s 10 generations — in each family there are 7 children — and here’s your gain.

                    Please provide specific evidence that the alleged Arab migration to Palestine was often higher than the Jewish one (after 1800). But since 1880, as the professor quoted by you writes, when English and Jewish capital were rapidly poured, then the mass migration of Jews to Palestine only began Yes And the Arabs, and so, and without capital by 1800 were 270 thousand, and Jews - only 5 thousand people.
                    1. +1
                      28 October 2015 21: 53
                      Quote: but still
                      Oh, the tricks are already in use - translate arrows I do not use the word "Palestinian" - I write "Arabs"

                      You absolutely rightly noticed. But where is the translation of the arrows here?
                      Population growth is not arithmetic.
  10. -1
    28 October 2015 10: 01
    It’s time for all the Arabs to be expelled from Israel, they didn’t want to live in peace - get out, only these scumbags are not needed in any Arab country. Jordan kicked out, Lebanon kicked out ...
    1. +2
      28 October 2015 11: 07
      Quote: Maksus
      It’s time for all the Arabs to be expelled from Israel, they didn’t want to live in peace - get out, only these scumbags are not needed in any Arab country. Jordan kicked out, Lebanon kicked out ...

      Well, the problem as usual has several solutions. For example, to expel the Jews just do not want to live in peace. After all, the UN did not ask the Palestinians whether they want to live with you or not.
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 11: 37
        Quote: Frigate
        just do not want to live in peace

        Where did such strange conclusions come from? what
      2. 0
        28 October 2015 14: 38
        Why is it "together with you"? Whom do you rank me among the Jews? The fact that I know history and against the bearded savages does not make me a Jew. So do not judge and you will not be judged.
        1. -1
          28 October 2015 17: 47
          Quote: Maksus
          Why is it "together with you"? Whom do you rank me among the Jews?

          Because you definitely do not look like an Arab. smile


          Quote: Maksus That I know the story and [b
          against bearded savages [/ b], does not make me a Jew. So [b] do not judge and you will not be judged [/ b].


          And the fact that you know history does not give you the right to insult other nations. So do not judge.
          1. +1
            28 October 2015 18: 56
            And we know that you know who I look like?) And savages - they are savages, there are no options here, excuse me, sorry, if it touched.
            1. -1
              28 October 2015 20: 58
              Quote: Maksus
              And we know that you know who I look like?).

              I just assumed. smile
  11. +4
    28 October 2015 10: 01
    The news is certainly not joyful, but where does the photograph of the UN Peacekeeper come to this article? request
  12. +9
    28 October 2015 10: 01
    If we omit the words "Israeli" and "Palestinian", and read - the soldiers shot their attacker with a knife, then this will not cause any complaints, but quite the opposite.
    1. +5
      28 October 2015 11: 40
      soldiers shot the attacker with a knife, it will not cause any complaints, but even vice versa.

      Let's try "the other way around": "Russian soldiers shot their attacker with a knife."
      I can imagine what kind of "complaints" will rise.
      Exemplary options are as follows:
      "A crowd of Russian soldiers, armed to the teeth, could not disarm one person who attacked them with one penknife."
      "Russian soldiers shot a peaceful man when they saw a knife for cutting vegetables in his hands," and so on.
      ----
      Double standards in action.
    2. +2
      28 October 2015 11: 55
      If we omit the words "Israeli" and "Palestinian", and read - the soldiers shot their attacker with a knife, then this will not cause any complaints, but quite the opposite.


      Not a fact, if a Russian soldier, unfortunately, can be imprisoned. And if not a soldier or a cop, then they’ll certainly be imprisoned.
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 12: 12
        Quote: alicante11
        Not a fact, if a Russian soldier, unfortunately, can be imprisoned. And if not a soldier or a cop, then they’ll certainly be imprisoned.

        Is there no law on self-defense in Russia?
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 13: 12
          Is there no law on self-defense in Russia?


          Yes, but does not work. In our country only deputies, judges and criminals are inviolable.
          1. 0
            29 October 2015 12: 04
            Quote: alicante11
            Yes, but does not work.

            let me guess who is to blame ... smile
        2. -1
          28 October 2015 14: 39
          Quote: Hello
          Is there no law on self-defense in Russia?

          In this case, it is a murder. Several trained armed soldiers shoot to kill one civilian with a knife. If it’s so scary that it’s weak to shoot at least a foot? Or in Israel, soldiers are all cowardly goners who in a crowd can not take a knife from a civilian? !!!
          1. 0
            28 October 2015 14: 46
            Quote: Native grandfather
            In this case, it is a murder. Several trained armed soldiers shoot to kill one civilian with a knife. If it’s so scary that it’s weak to shoot at least a foot? Or in Israel, soldiers are all cowardly goners who in a crowd can not take a knife from a civilian? !!!

            Great logic. In the frame and on the wall. Sprinkle then on this brilliant example of the internal split personality with your saliva? Well, to fix
          2. +1
            28 October 2015 15: 25
            Quote: Native grandfather
            In this case, it is a murder. Several trained armed soldiers shoot to kill one civilian with a knife

            In this case, this is an attack on a person with a danger to life. A civilian with a knife attacking a soldier turns into a violator of the law and must bear in mind that he will get a bullet.
            Quote: Native grandfather
            If it’s so scary that it’s weak to shoot at least a foot?

            I would look at you in this situation.
            Quote: Native grandfather
            Or in Israel, soldiers are all cowardly goners who in a crowd can not take a knife from a civilian? !!!

            I suppose that Russian soldiers / police would do the same and be right.
  13. 0
    28 October 2015 10: 08
    I wonder what does UNovets in the photo have to do with it?
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 10: 29
      Quote: Pimply
      I wonder what does UNovets in the photo have to do with it?

      such a norm?
  14. +10
    28 October 2015 10: 12
    Well, why again the woods in the dying fire on the site? One went to the kill, realizing how it would end. Others to shoot alive shot him.
    But it can be interpreted differently ... The patriot and fighter heroically attacked the aggressors and fell in an unequal battle ... It is not regrettable, but this is not a separate issue for VO.
    Here ours, cable "cut ... or listen good "amerikosov ... that's the topic! fellow
  15. +4
    28 October 2015 10: 45
    Do not care who in Israel attacked whom, clipped and shot. Let the Israeli police engage in commonplace crime. The news is nothing at all.
  16. +1
    28 October 2015 10: 46
    Quote: miru mir
    FILYSTIN

    It all starts with a small one, and then you are surprised that it’s us with knives, bombs, rackets, but you don’t need to do anything, no matter how long it all goes on, this conflict cannot be resolved by military means, unless one of the opponents it’s not possible to go to zero, but it’s not real, you know, you’ll have to make concessions anyway, there is no other choice.
    1. -2
      28 October 2015 10: 52
      Quote: Alget87
      Quote: miru mir
      FILYSTIN

      It all starts small, and then wonder what they are with us with knives, bombs

      For what Palestine in Greek called Philistia? Well, yes, a good enough reason for the bomb knives ... laughing
    2. -1
      28 October 2015 11: 40
      What are you speaking about?
      And they tried to negotiate, nothing good came of it. It was after such agreements that the second "intifada" began. And having taken the troops out of the gas got a terrorist base close by.
  17. 0
    28 October 2015 10: 48
    Israeli soldiers shot to death a Palestinian who attacked them with a knife

    This is just some kind of circus. Remember, most recently we had the same headings. Extremists of Slavic appearance, with bare hands, alone, attacked large groups of armed, innocent rafics. Naturally, they had to defend themselves, Slavic extremists were dying, accidentally falling and hitting their heads on the curb, then the curbs even tried to judge. Here, obviously, Israeli soldiers stood peacefully at the checkpoint, ate ice cream and suddenly, they were attacked by a Palestinian scumbag, they had to be killed.
    1. -4
      28 October 2015 11: 44

      Yes Yes Yes. That's exactly what happens. You better know from the sofa.
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 13: 04
        At the beginning of the video, people simply did not manage the car or was drunk at the wheel. I think Israel’s domestic crime news doesn't even need to be discussed. Let the Israeli police deal with the routine, they pay money for it. With the bus, in general, everything is easier, thugs went into the bus and began to rob passengers. Someone clearly did not want to share the mobile phone and angered the robbers.
        1. +2
          28 October 2015 13: 24
          Yeah. And then drunk jumped out and started knocking down a man with a knife fool
        2. +1
          29 October 2015 12: 13
          Quote: regdan
          or was drunk at the wheel

          is a Muslim drunk?
          1. 0
            29 October 2015 12: 27
            Quote: MACCABI-TLV
            Quote: regdan
            or was drunk at the wheel

            is a Muslim drunk?

            Generally amazing. And they say, but the Jews do not eat pork at all, anywhere and never.)))
            1. 0
              30 October 2015 01: 18
              Quote: Your friend
              And they say, but the Jews do not eat pork at all, anywhere and never.)))

              religious people don’t eat. Secular Arabs are nonsense, secular Jews are not.
              1. 0
                30 October 2015 12: 38
                Quote: MACCABI-TLV
                Quote: Your friend
                And they say, but the Jews do not eat pork at all, anywhere and never.)))

                religious people don’t eat. Secular Arabs are nonsense, secular Jews are not.

                What Arabs, you did not write anything about Arabs. You wrote about Muslims.
                is a Muslim drunk?
                1. 0
                  31 October 2015 11: 22
                  Quote: Your friend
                  What Arabs, you did not write anything about Arabs. You wrote about Muslims.

                  and what other Muslims live in Israel?
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 06
    Quote: Das Boot
    Palestine in Greek called Philistia

    It’s just that you don’t have to juggle and you don’t need to make fools of us either, Greek drag in, everything is perfectly clear what he wanted to say and how he said it, it’s a shame
    you have "reached the rank of general", but you do not see elementary things.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      28 October 2015 11: 46
      I call FILISTIN in Arabic, and that is exactly what I wanted to say. Origin of the word Palestine you know?
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 14: 51
        Quote: miru mir
        I call FILISTIN in Arabic, and that is exactly what I wanted to say. The origin of the word palestine do you know?

        We know the Russian spelling of the word. And based on the analogy of your reasoning, should Beijing be called Beijin, the Russian city of Blagoveshchensk is Bushi, and China is Chinoy?
        No, really. Please spell words correctly.
        1. -1
          28 October 2015 15: 17
          No, really. Let me not teach you spelling.
        2. 0
          28 October 2015 16: 25
          Quote: Native grandfather
          And based on the analogy of your reasoning, should Beijing be called Beijin, the Russian city of Blagoveshchensk is Bushi, and China is Chinoy?
          No, really. Please spell words correctly.

          OK. With your morality, regret branches devoted to xoxl and others. Study and be indignant. AT the rarest In some cases, commentators use the name adopted by the UN Statute. Righteous anger towards Jews using jargon towards Palestine, I personally consider inappropriate. With uv. and so on.
    3. 0
      29 October 2015 12: 16
      Quote: Alget87
      you don’t need to make fools of us either, Greek weave

      and it’s not at all difficult. winked
      https://translate.google.co.il/?hl=ru&tab=wT#ru/ar/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%8
      1%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0
      ask google to pronounce what is written.
  20. +5
    28 October 2015 11: 16
    Guys. Is there really no more news.
  21. +7
    28 October 2015 11: 34
    it is necessary to rename the site to "Jewish review"
  22. +1
    28 October 2015 11: 57
    The people are not much off topic. Yesterday, at the UN General Assembly (optional body), the United States (understood) and Izrail (not understood) voted on the proposal to remove sanctions from Cuba. The question is for the Jews. Do you have the media there or the government explained this vote somehow? Very curious winked lol
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 12: 33
      Quote: kagorta
      The people are not much off topic. Yesterday, at the UN General Assembly (optional body), the United States (understood) and Izrail (not understood) voted on the proposal to remove sanctions from Cuba. The question is for the Jews. Do you have the media there or the government explained this vote somehow? Very curious winked lol

      You don’t know. Hamas Cubans trained, in any case, a certain pimpled one says so.
  23. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 28
    I don’t see the difference between these peoples. The difference is only in the technique of religion. And so to meet them together, you can not distinguish from each other.
  24. 0
    28 October 2015 12: 41
    And miru mir walks around Israel in a Kyrgyz cap.
    1. +2
      28 October 2015 12: 54
      Right. I have such a userpic. Only I do not go either in ak-kalpak or in a pile. Does it cause anger in you?
  25. 0
    28 October 2015 13: 02
    I was always amazed at your Jewish adaptability; you change (skin) the profile of what you are, what your fellow citizens are.
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 14: 11
      If you know me from my old nickname, what is my aptitude? That I received a ban, opened a new account? And what have I changed from last time?
      1. -1
        28 October 2015 15: 01
        And why did you get miru mir ban?
        1. +3
          28 October 2015 15: 19
          Before contacting me, do you consider it necessary to apologize? Or do words mean nothing to you? Then I have no interest in communicating with you.
  26. +3
    28 October 2015 13: 14
    Quote: miru mir
    FILUSTIN in Arabic

    And what is the Arab site here or in Arabic every first cut and don’t have to dodge, as I said above, everyone perfectly understood what you said and how you said, but in general your style here is like that — they gave out some kind of pearl, and then I and the horse is not mine, forever everything with dodges, with some kind of subtitles in general, treat people as you want them to treat you and people will reach you wink Yes, you are already there with Mr. Das Boot to decide, and then in Greek, then in Arabic, a mess lol what people will think.
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 13: 23
      Quote: Alget87
      and in general, treat people as you want to be treated and people will reach you

      Thanks for the moralizing.
      Quote: Alget87
      gave some kind of pearl

      Well, who is stopping you? So far, only inaudible morals are heard from you.
    2. +1
      28 October 2015 14: 40
      I don’t understand what exactly you are showing me, dear. I express my personal opinion and deny the lie. If the Arabic word FILYSTIN cuts your ear, I ask you forgiveness.
  27. 0
    28 October 2015 13: 20
    And you say hello to this Kyrgyz-Cossack-Yabreb in the Kyrgyz language. For example, like this: salam alaikum, anansig bachaboz.
    1. -1
      28 October 2015 14: 13
      Something I do not understand your claims to me personally. On the topic have something to say?
  28. +1
    28 October 2015 13: 23
    Quote: miru mir
    Look at the FYLystin map in XNUMHs of last year and appreciate the layout.


    Dear, I understand your hatred of the Palestinians. It is already on a subconscious level - hence the antics in the name, like our opposition. Honor you it does not. And Israeli policy will not lead you out of the impasse. But the reality remains - thousands of Arabs remain powerless. And please do not slip into naked anti-Islamism.
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 14: 44
      Dear, I have friends among FILYSTINS. Out of habit, I pronounce this word in Arabic, not wanting to offend anyone.
      What do you see the Arab powerlessness? Are you talking about Arabs, Israelis?
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 15: 38
        I am talking about Palestinian Arabs (the Fullystins are more accurate, but you shouldn’t write capital letters). After all, the Israeli patrol will not bind to the car a Jew? If we talk about rights. Deep stratification is a diagnosis.
        1. -2
          28 October 2015 17: 00
          Why do you think so? With troublemakers do not stand on ceremony, regardless of nationality.
          1. 0
            28 October 2015 23: 03
            So the boys Arabs tied? To make you calm? And you did not look at nationality. Cynicism in the cube.
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 23: 27
              I honestly don’t know what you mean. Last Friday night, screams woke me up. It turned out that the thumping boys fought laughing So they both were tied with plastic gangs hands behind their backs and back to back to each other laughing
              1. -2
                29 October 2015 00: 40
                You do not hear me, and you do not want to hear ...

                Go ... laugh ...
                1. +1
                  29 October 2015 02: 35
                  Quote: East Wind
                  You do not hear me, and you do not want to hear ...

                  Quote: East Wind
                  reality remains - thousands of Arabs remain powerless.

                  In no Arab country in the Middle East, Arabs do not have as many rights as Palestinians. Their standard of living is higher than that of their neighbors, and you make them sufferers of a concentration camp. I don’t know how Gaza, but if Israel fences off the West Bank unilaterally, stops giving them water, gas, electricity, expels all the guest workers, then they will bend in half a year.

                  They get big money for which they do not build anything, do not create. The budget of UNRWA alone is $ 1.2 billion, 95% of which comes from Europe and the United States, and not from the Arab brothers.
                2. 0
                  29 October 2015 14: 40
                  In 1995, I saw a news clip at a similar funeral. A helicopter flew over a procession of screaming alahahbar shaids with a stretcher. The stretchers were thrown to the ground and prematurely killed, miraculously, came to life and rushed along with everyone.
  29. +2
    28 October 2015 13: 28
    Quote: miru mir
    . And having withdrawn the troops from the gases, they received a terrorist base at hand.

    Well, then build a wall like Berlin, deport all Arabs behind this wall, and forgot, minefields, towers with automatic weapons with motion sensors in front of the wall, well there are drones, all kinds of radars, you have no problems with that, there are good developments. .. there will be HAPPINESS for you, and most importantly: all this will need to be done across your entire border, with everyone, and then you will have FULL HAPPINESS.
  30. +1
    28 October 2015 13: 46
    [quote = Das Boot] thanks for the moral. And what is wrong with this and this is not moralizing, but just advice, and if you did not like it, then you are already initially set up aggressively towards everyone and want to be treated as well? do I understand? Well then, do not be offended that they treat you this way, and even if you are responsible for miru mir, coordinate your comments or something, but it turns out somehow strange and not believable.
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 17: 31
      Quote: Alget87
      not moralizing, but just advice

      it would be better moralizing. Because The advice is pretty yogi.
      Quote: Alget87
      initially aggressive towards everyone

      nonsense. Not "to all", but only to you like. In general, you know, I can't stand ultra-psychics from my youth. This dive between us could not have happened had you not stooped to the teachings and platitudes about the Berlin Wall. I hope that in the future we will not have a reason to notice each other.
  31. +1
    28 October 2015 13: 57
    Quote: Das Boot
    So far, only inaudible morals are heard from you.

    Morality? you ?, yes, there is too much honor, I have nothing else to do, it's the other way around, you read morality to everyone here and do not tolerate any objections, according to the principle: "there are two opinions, mine and not correct", capable, from the end of August on the site and already "General" Eagle!
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 16: 42
      Quote: Alget87
      from the end of August on the site and already "General" Eagle!

      about the general tzatseks and other rating tinsel, which, as I notice, bothers you: relax, network floods with your uniform of a retired political worker in the closet have nothing to do. Morality from military pensioners on the site is complete and without your teachings.
      Quote: Alget87
      too much honor
      Is that so ..? Do not fail, come down and show what is there ... Unless, of course, there is something to say.
  32. +1
    28 October 2015 14: 30
    Miru mir.And why your people write in a personal account. Yesterday, your neighbor also unsubscribed in a personal account. And in person you can tell why you changed your (skin) profile. : military unit, п-п28804 years of service 1994-97.v / h21005 service1999-2000
    1. -1
      28 October 2015 15: 24
      Do you know the meaning of the phrase written in Kyrgyz for me? Actually, for insults, I was personally banned. And for the use of the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages, too. Further communication will continue only after your apology.
  33. 0
    28 October 2015 15: 01
    The legal adviser to the Israeli cabinet of ministers, Yehuda Weinstein, has prepared a report, the essence of which, according to Ch10, is to prohibit military and security personnel from shooting at a terrorist after he has been neutralized.

    According to the newspaper, this conclusion was a response to a request from the Adallah public organization: they demanded that an investigation be launched against the police and military personnel who opened fire on Palestinian terrorists after they were neutralized.


    That is, do not shoot those already shot? For more than 2 weeks now, several terrorist attacks in Israel have been committed or prevented every day. A question to the Israelis: how many cases of terrorist attacks (in October), in how many of them the terrorist / ka were shot, in how many victims died, in how many cases the Israelis fell under "friendly fire", in how many cases, being a few meters from the attacker, the latter was shot, despite the fact that it was possible to neutralize him with shots in the legs? Yes, write about the age of the attackers - they are mostly young people from 13 to 25 years old. Yes, more - how many were shot when they approached the fence in the Gaza Strip? No tear gas? No water cannons? Everything is somehow so - some kill others - others kill the first ... Violence breeds violence. And so on endlessly. I AM AGAINST TERROR. IT IS NECESSARY TO AGREE, and not to drag out the problem for decades!
  34. -1
    28 October 2015 15: 26
    miru mir.A me for what?
  35. +2
    28 October 2015 15: 52
    Yes miru mir. And what am I supposed to kill now? But I won’t kill myself. And why do you leave the opportunity to shit to the Jews? Why are your fellow citizens sophisticated in verbiage? And when do you shovel on the face? What do you attribute to me? It was a rhetorical question.
  36. -1
    28 October 2015 17: 31
    I have a cherished dream: to go to Novosibirsk to meet with friends and colleagues. Walk in the vicinity of the "academic town". And meet a certain warty citizen, who is all overgrown with warts. And cure a warty citizen congenital squint.
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 18: 40
      Quote: Boris Zidkov
      Walk in the vicinity of the "academic town". And meet a certain warty citizen, who is all overgrown with warts. And cure a warty citizen congenital squint.

      ehm. What’s stopping you? So go. Not?
  37. 0
    28 October 2015 18: 50
    Yes, here's work, home, family. Once I was in Mochishchi, Shilovo. Tokmachevo. Somehow we will phone and go.
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 19: 20
      Quote: Boris Zidkov
      Yes, here's work, home, family. Once I was in Mochishchi, Shilovo. Tokmachevo. Somehow we will phone and go.

      Come on, tell me how you will pack your luggage in the right-hand drive, which I drove from Vladik three years ago ... interesting, yes ... and about the work-house ... p-d-c, how interesting ... don’t stop. .photo from egypt zapotsI ... where there is a pyramid on the palm ... Bro - you're the best ...
      1. 0
        28 October 2015 19: 25
        Quote: Das Boot
        Quote: Boris Zidkov
        Yes, here's work, home, family. Once I was in Mochishchi, Shilovo. Tokmachevo. Somehow we will phone and go.

        Come on, tell me how you will pack your luggage in the right-hand drive, which I drove from Vladik three years ago ... interesting, yes ... and about the work-house ... p-d-ts, how interesting ... not stopping. .photo from egypt zapotsI ... where there is a pyramid on the palm ... Bro - you're the best ...

        What are the pictures with the pyramid on the palm? Did you do it yourself? And why don't you like right-hand drives, they say better than the "Japanese" assembled in Turkey?
        1. 0
          28 October 2015 20: 22
          Quote: Your friend
          What kind of pictures with a pyramid on the palm of your hand? Did you do it yourself? And what do you dislike right-hand drive,

          Nope) I didn’t and don’t like it)laughing And I do not care, like everyone here
          Quote: Your friend
          "Japanese" gathered in Turkey?

          frankly, to me the problem of oblique importers is right-handed from Japan in the context of stab stabbing in Israel .... Although, in general - in general. laughing
          1. 0
            28 October 2015 20: 41
            Quote: Das Boot
            Quote: Your friend
            What kind of pictures with a pyramid on the palm of your hand? Did you do it yourself? And what do you dislike right-hand drive,

            Nope) I didn’t and don’t like it)laughing And I do not care, like everyone here
            Quote: Your friend
            "Japanese" gathered in Turkey?

            frankly, to me the problem of oblique importers is right-handed from Japan in the context of stab stabbing in Israel .... Although, in general - in general. laughing


            Come on, tell me how you will pack your luggage in the right-hand drive, which I drove from Vladik three years ago ... interesting


            Even somehow everything is contradictory, then "interesting", then the same "honestly, crap". Oh, and you are our contradictory.)))
            1. 0
              28 October 2015 20: 54
              Quote: Your friend
              Even somehow everything is contradictory, then "interesting", then the same "honestly, crap"

              Fair? - cpa. And on the presentation of your bureaucrats about "hear, not in masque ..." -. And on your customs officers, with whom you arrange cockroach races there with mutual fucking - also crap. Will you ask for a link? Vladik is yours, licked by the authorities. And Nakhodka. How about: "Yes-well-nah-you-here-hto -... ah-yes-sorry-here-
              1. -1
                28 October 2015 21: 18
                Quote: Das Boot
                Quote: Your friend
                Even somehow everything is contradictory, then "interesting", then the same "honestly, crap"

                Fair? - cpa. And on the presentation of your bureaucrats about "hear, not in masque ..." -. And on your customs officers, with whom you arrange cockroach races there with mutual fucking - also crap. Will you ask for a link? Vladik is yours, licked by the authorities. And Nakhodka. How about: "Yes-well-nah-you-here-hto -... ah-yes-sorry-here-

                Chito ??? I finally can live in the "maskwe".))) Eck, you got sick to the Far East, they offended you there a lot.)))
  38. 0
    28 October 2015 18: 57
    Yes, and Tokmachevo is Tolmachevo.
  39. -1
    28 October 2015 22: 51
    How does Das Boot get you.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"