If jihad tomorrow

17
The most terrible criminal - armed with ideology

What is the difference between ISIS and Wahhabis who are more familiar to us from the events in the North Caucasus, Islamic scholar Rais Suleymanov, expert of the National Strategy Institute, editor-in-chief of the Muslim World magazine, told the Military Industrial Courier.

- The main difference between ISIS and all other Islamist organizations and movements is that they went further than others in the realization of their main goal - they declared a caliphate. This cherished dream of an ideal state, which Islamic fundamentalists cherished, was put into practice. And if in the North Caucasus or in Afghanistan they fought for the creation of Islamic states that were seen in some specific boundaries (the same “Emirate of the Caucasus”, proclaimed in 2007 year), the ISIL leaders proclaimed it to be extraterritorial in nature. They even call him simply the “Islamic State” (ad-Dawlah al-Islamiyah). If Al-Qaida functioned as an organization with a network of branches in different countries, the Emirate Caucasus was more virtual, then ISIL is a territory where its state institutions have been operating for more than a year, and in different countries from Nigeria to Afghanistan - he is sworn in by groups with similar views. The main danger lies in the fact that the ideology of ISIS is expansionary in nature, threatening the territorial integrity of the countries close to which it is located, and the national security of many others that are far away. Pulling as a magnet from the countries of Europe and from the post-Soviet space into the ranks of the Islamists, ISIL in the future will begin to transfer them back - to launch terrorist activities on the ground.

Traditional Islam for Russian Muslims is a form that has historically been adopted by one or another indigenous people of the country, has become part of its national culture, traditions, self-awareness and worldview, preaching peaceful coexistence with people of other religions, loyal to the Fatherland and political device. In theological, theological terms, in relation to the indigenous Muslim peoples of Russia, it is usually still specified which religious-legal school (mazhab) they belong to. In Russia, there are two madhhabs - the Hanafi (the peoples of the Ural-Volga region, the Crimea and partly of the North Caucasus - the Adygs, the Nogai, etc.) and the Shafiites (the other peoples of the North Caucasus).

The ideology of ISIS is Wahhabism, and its most extreme form is takfirism, when all the other Islamic directions that disagree with it can be taken out takfir (accusation of disbelief), which means full approval of the murder.

- What is understood as Islamic extremism or radicalism?

- Islamic extremism - a set of manifestations of extreme views and illegal actions with the use, cover and justification of their dogma. When they come out for changing the existing state system, they begin to manipulate the religious feelings of ordinary Muslims, rigidly opposing themselves to the “infidel,” this is Islamic radicalism.

- The facts are known when Russians became Wahhabis. What caused this?

- I single out several groups of Russian Muslims, all of them, according to my estimates, from three to five thousand, classifying by motivation for Islam: 1) who converted to Islam for ideological reasons, as a result of spiritual quest; 2) having changed faith due to family and marriage circumstances, for example, a Russian girl marries a Tatar, and before the wedding there are nicknames (Muslim marriage), during which the bride adopts Islam; 3) have adopted Islam out of opportunistic considerations, when it is profitable to be a Muslim, this can be observed among some officials in Tatarstan who converted to Islam to become their own among the national bureaucracy; 4) captured in Afghanistan or Chechnya and remaining in the bosom of Islam.

If jihad tomorrowThe greatest number of radicals comes from the first group. After the adoption of Islam, these people are experiencing neophyte syndrome - the desire to demonstrate religious zeal, to correct a certain guilt for having not been a Muslim before, and to prove to co-religionists that it is not worse. Often, it is in this environment that those who are ready to prove their new religious identity with the help of weapons. The most famous Islamic terrorists in Russia are representatives of Russian Muslims: Alexander Tikhomirov (Said Buryatsky), Victor Dvorakovsky, Vitaly Razdobudko, Alla Saprykina, Pavel Pechenkin. So it turns out that three to five thousand Russian neophytes yielded as a percentage much more terrorists than the five million Tatars who traditionally practice Islam.

Among the reasons for which Russians choose Islam, I would call either the lack of religious experience of being in the bosom of Orthodoxy, or the perception of Christianity as a religion of wimps, advocating non-violence, and also fully part of the state system of Russia. They explain their opposition to the ROC and, accordingly, their choice in favor of Islam by the fact that the Church is the “servant” of the state, which is identified with corruption, lawlessness, lawlessness. In the same way, by the way, they also belong to the traditional Muslim clergy, considering it to be the service personnel of the bureaucracy. Islam is seen by them as a religion opposed to the political system. Since the Russian boy or girl is not able to thoroughly understand the different currents of Islam, the radicals present Wahhabism as the only true creed.

- There are cases when Wahhabi ideology penetrates the environment of law enforcement officers and military personnel?

- The well-known example is Colonel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Tajikistan, commander of the riot police, holder of several orders and medals Gulmurod Halimov. This is the most egregious case when a law enforcement officer, and a senior official, became a Wahhabi and even went to fight on the side of the Islamists. But there are sad examples in Russia. Thus, the deputy prosecutor of Almetyevsk (Tatarstan), Askhat Davletshin, in 2009, left to fight for the Taliban in Afghanistan, and from there he moved to Pakistan. Subsequently, he managed to smuggle his like-minded Pavel Dorokhov (Abdul Mujib) back to Russia, where in Salavat (Bashkortostan) he, together with the local Wahhabis, tried to blow up the pumping station of the water utility. The attack failed.

No known cases of the spread of Wahhabism in the Armed Forces of Russia have yet been noted. Although the biographies of some Wahhabis can be judged that a person, having gone into the army, was returning home with radical convictions.

- Russia openly sided with the legitimate government of Syria against ISIS. In connection with this, do you expect a surge of extremism in our country?

- As we remember, from 1999 to 2004, the Wahhabis in response to our actions in Chechnya blew up houses in Moscow, Buynaksk, Volgodonsk, Kaspiysk, and took hostages. There were acts of terrorism in scope and smaller consequences. And now you need to be prepared for the fact that there will be similar attempts by supporters of ISIS. The number of compatriots who went to Jihad is constantly growing: if 2013 Russians left for Syria in 400, then 2014 is already at the beginning of 1700, and in September, according to the FSB, 2400. There is a tendency to increase. 200 people left the territory of the Volga Federal District. After some time, the Wahhabis returned, the former igilovtsevs were arrested from the end of 2014 onwards, and some trials had already taken place (there were three such cases in Tatarstan).

ISIS from the very beginning did not hide its plans for Russia, especially the North Caucasus. Now, when we are already participating in the war with ISIS, we must be prepared that jihad will be announced not only to the Assad government, but also to us. And the Wahhabis can repeat all the actions that they took during the second Chechen war: terrorist attacks, hostage taking, etc.

- What recommendations can be given to military and police officers, who, as a matter of duty, have to resist radicals and extremists?

- First, be prepared for charges of Islamophobia. This is a favorite technique of the radicals. It is not easy for security officials in the Caucasus and the Volga region, who are ethnic Muslims. They are accused of betraying their religion. Wahhabis love to organize such a public campaign on the Internet. Secondly, to understand that the fight against religious extremists should be based on traditional Islam. Well, when power methods are combined with preventive. The traditional Muslim clergy should be an ally of the police, the army and the FSB. And it must be sure that law enforcement agencies will protect it. Often, Wahhabis threaten even imams if they begin to cooperate with the police. And thirdly, we must remember that the most terrible criminal is armed with ideology. It is important to counter it with a more attractive for young people view of the world, built on a positive and encouraging creative work.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    28 October 2015 14: 37
    we have been living in a state of "jihad" for a thousand years
    1. +7
      28 October 2015 14: 47
      we must be prepared that jihad will be announced not only to the Assad government, but also to us.

      Yes, we prepared well, this is not the 90s! Let it be better to fear the "Russian jihad" overseas and on the island ...
      1. +16
        28 October 2015 15: 37
        What to do with non-violence in Orthodoxy? ..
      2. +2
        28 October 2015 17: 49
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Better to fear "Russian jihad" overseas and on the island

        ... in fact, Comrade Suleimanov R. hellishly revealed the essence of IS and Wahhabism!
        The ideology of the Islamic State and its foundations of Wahhabism are based on the idea of ​​the equality of all disadvantaged Muslims, especially those who believe in Islam, and their opposition to all the others - the prosperous rich Muslim countries, Europeans, Americans, and even Russians ...
        Take a look around - Muslims of all the Middle East, many African and Central Asian countries - poor, uneducated, destitute and disadvantaged. It is enough to throw a cry - "Equality and Brotherhood" of all the disadvantaged - a powerful avalanche sweeping away everything, a stream of people, immediately forms. The Black International of Islam is in this very similar to the Red Communist International of the beginning of the last century.

        Already wrote -
        IS ideology is passionate and massive - "the disadvantaged of all countries - unite and fight against the infidels and against world inequality for freedom and justice under the banner of Allah!" It is impossible to eradicate at the root, because "traditional cozy Islam" (our Russian Islam) loses in everything in a collision.
        I will add, this is the "black international", which has a lot from the "red project":
        - intransigence and adherence
        - the idea is primary, everything else is secondary
        - the same ideas of "equality, brotherhood, justice" among their own. And without dividing into nations and nationalities, the main thing is commitment to ideas.

        Victory in the military sense - surrender or surrender of something - is impossible, because there is neither statehood nor the Governing Center. One can only try to inflict a quick military defeat on their troops by expelling them from the territories ...

        The next step is to "remove" the preaching ideologues, drive them into a "controlled area" and force them to play according to the "generally accepted rules of the game." As if peaceful coexistence ... and gradually chopping off the feeding environment in the form of poverty, illiteracy ... and so on. etc.
        Sounds familiar? That and that ...
        1. -1
          28 October 2015 23: 58
          That is why Strelkov is right when he talks about the Syrian adventure of Putinism. Until the global problems of the emergence of ISIS, the problems of the lack of world security and a fair social system for everyone have been resolved, this problem cannot be solved by bombing, they will only arrange for the Russian Federation another fraud for extremists.

          By the way, the question is ... the Phillington ISIS destroyed the most savage methods of millions of people with socialist views, however, it is still not just not bombed, but even condemned for it. The Ukronazi ISIS destroys thousands of Russian people in no less fanciful ways, but it’s not that it is not bombed or condemned, but even called a partner.
          1. +1
            29 October 2015 05: 23
            Here, by the way, is the same question. And you yourself from what ISIS will be? wink With an anti-Putinist?
            Quote: Realist58
            That is why Strelkov is right when he talks about the Syrian adventure of Putinism. Until the global problems of the emergence of ISIS, the problems of the lack of world security and a fair social system for everyone have been resolved, this problem cannot be solved by bombing, they will only arrange for the Russian Federation another fraud for extremists.

            By the way, the question is ... the Phillington ISIS destroyed the most savage methods of millions of people with socialist views, however, it is still not just not bombed, but even condemned for it. The Ukronazi ISIS destroys thousands of Russian people in no less fanciful ways, but it’s not that it is not bombed or condemned, but even called a partner.
  2. +16
    28 October 2015 14: 39
    In Russia, this will not work (we have tried more than once with blood ..) Russia is a multinational country, it was and will be!
    But the devils were soaked and will be soaked .. (regardless of nationality) This is the strength of Russia, it has been and will be!
    1. +7
      28 October 2015 15: 27
      Patriotism is good, but do not forget about generation 90! When the ideologists of the West were at home in Russia, and they did what they wanted, you don’t have to go far, what was written in the textbooks of children, just horror.!
  3. +3
    28 October 2015 14: 53
    Prior to reading this article, he considered the Islamic State ideologically Salafi movement, and they are Wahhabi. Wahhabi State-Saudi Arabia.
    1. +1
      28 October 2015 17: 24
      ISIS is the answer without limit to the limit without why the Russians go to Isil, it is also a response to the lack of ideology, disappointment both in the communist one, which essentially sold the interests of the working people, and the failed capitalist one, which defends the interests of big capital. It turns out that they need to beat both, the end justifies the means, then the most odious ones will be destroyed in ISIS itself, as they are already trying to do in Ukraine.
      1. +1
        28 October 2015 18: 28
        Quote: varov14
        ISIS is the answer of the demon limit to the demon limit

        ... outrage on the outside!
        And inside they just observe the principles of "equality, brotherhood". Those. those who obey the laws diligently and fight without sparing their belly - they are exhibited as an example. Those who violate the laws and behave not like brothers are severely punished.
        That is their strength ...
        At the ideological level, they are at the level of ideas of communism.

        It is difficult to fight, but you can: "knock out" the most ideological leaders, introducing "carefully disguised elements" upward in the hope that someday they will blow up the organization from the inside ...
      2. +3
        28 October 2015 22: 09
        Quote: varov14
        ISIS is the answer without limit to the limit without why the Russians go to Isil, it is also a response to the lack of ideology, disappointment both in the communist one, which essentially sold the interests of the working people, and the failed capitalist one, which defends the interests of big capital.

        That's right, as they say - "" "Hearts not occupied by us, our enemy will immediately take over" ""
        In place of the October Revolution, Pioneer and Komsomol, Skinheads, EMOs, EGOs, Pedos, and other craps of the Witnesses and Aumsenrikyo type of interest came.
        The Constitution stipulates that state ideology is prohibited, which, however, does not impede the spread of non-state ideology that came from outside and paid from there.
        By the way, liberalism, all sorts of grant-eaters and others present this process as "the development of a multifaceted society", but they immediately start howling in chorus as soon as they hear a hint of the need to amend the Constitution regarding the presence of state ideology, immediately labeling the "police state" regime "and" infringement of the rights and freedoms of citizens. "
        For a healthy society, a healthy ideology based on a unifying idea, to which we have not yet arrived, but only moved a little in the right direction through unification with Crimea, is absolutely essential. It is necessary to amend the Constitution and work with youth - without this, nothing.
  4. +3
    28 October 2015 15: 36
    You just don’t have to forget your story when there are roots - there is a future.
    1. 0
      28 October 2015 17: 31
      But when all and sundry suggest that the roots are rotten try to resist.
  5. +2
    28 October 2015 17: 35
    Gundyaev's henchmen immediately began from the end - they behave like a church before the 17th year, mired in luxury, excessive consumption and pride. They have nothing to do with Asceticism and the real church. Rather, the words beg for it - a closed club of interests, a sect, a gang.
  6. +5
    28 October 2015 18: 21
    If tomorrow jihad rub bullets with fat.
  7. 0
    28 October 2015 19: 23
    This is how they ("Syrian" emigrants) are met in Europe ... laughing
  8. -1
    28 October 2015 21: 16
    If jihad tomorrow

    Well, then I'll go to Ukrainian skins to agitate, that still young people, they would have symbols and motorcycles, and soak churk-not-Russian-Slavic. I have a URAL "SOLO" (he drove it from the factory), everyone is screwing.
    Roughly of course. But somehow partially true .. sad these are the things .. You’re our wolves on TV on Krassnaya Square ... and what they’re doing at the stadiums, they don’t see ..
  9. 0
    28 October 2015 22: 58
    It is bad that we have no ideology in Rossiti, and without it there is no basis for the development vector. In the name of what?
  10. +4
    28 October 2015 23: 59
    Cool discussion, but what about people who are not Christians and Muslims, and they don’t want to believe all of this? They are Old Believers, they are Old Slavic Pagans (after all, human sacrifice is attributed to them all, a parallel is drawn - Paganism-sacrifice-human sacrifice.
    Good handling? But what about the sacrifices of the most inviolable people on the planet?
    What about the proven killing of young children by Jews on their holidays ???
  11. 0
    31 October 2015 00: 14
    Quote: Rus2012

    ... in fact, Comrade Suleimanov R. hellishly revealed the essence of IS and Wahhabism!
    The ideology of the Islamic State and its foundations of Wahhabism are based on the idea of ​​the equality of all disadvantaged Muslims, especially those who believe in Islam, and their opposition to all the others - the prosperous rich Muslim countries, Europeans, Americans, and even Russians ...
    Take a look around - Muslims of all the Middle East, many African and Central Asian countries - poor, uneducated, destitute and disadvantaged. It is enough to throw a cry - "Equality and Brotherhood" of all the disadvantaged - a powerful avalanche sweeping away everything, a stream of people, immediately forms. The Black International of Islam is in this very similar to the Red Communist International of the beginning of the last century.

    Already wrote -
    IS ideology is passionate and massive - "the disadvantaged of all countries - unite and fight against the infidels and against world inequality for freedom and justice under the banner of Allah!" It is impossible to eradicate at the root, because "traditional cozy Islam" (our Russian Islam) loses in everything in a collision.
    I will add, this is the "black international", which has a lot from the "red project":
    - intransigence and adherence
    - the idea is primary, everything else is secondary
    - the same ideas of "equality, brotherhood, justice" among their own. And without dividing into nations and nationalities, the main thing is commitment to ideas.

    Victory in the military sense - surrender or surrender of something - is impossible, because there is neither statehood nor the Governing Center. One can only try to inflict a quick military defeat on their troops by expelling them from the territories ...

    The next step is to "remove" the preaching ideologues, drive them into a "controlled area" and force them to play according to the "generally accepted rules of the game." As if peaceful coexistence ... and gradually chopping off the feeding environment in the form of poverty, illiteracy ... and so on. etc.
    Sounds familiar? That and that ...

    I agree. Using the discontent of the poorest layers of the enemy state to weaken it is a very ancient, but very effective method. In Russo-Japanese, the Japanese were very successful in financing the purchase of weapons for the Russian revolutionaries, the revolution of 1905 certainly influenced the outcome of the Russo-Japanese war. Financing of the Bolsheviks by the German general staff through Parvus and Lenin, as well as by Jacob Schiff, the New York banker, was almost the first person on Wall Street at that time, it also worked through Trotsky to the First World War. Only then the misfire came out and for the first time in history a state of workers and peasants turned out, which only through seventy years (!) the whole capitalist world was able to dump. When they tried "head-on", they smashed their foreheads, but only after Stalin's death, when it turned out the worms of the Gorbachev-Yeltsin-Yakovlev-Gaidar-shev
    Arnadze-and other Mr-az introduce, the USSR fell. Stalin could not instill immunity against such people. So now in my NONE revolution under socialist slogans does not occur. But only under the religious, nationalist, near de-destical and other for the working people useless and harmful.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"