Military Review

"Admiral Kuznetsov" shot out on a training goal in the Barents Sea

65
РђРІРёР ° РЅРµСЃСѓС ‰ РёР№ крейсер РЎР¤ in "РђРґРјРёСЂР ° Р” Fleet Советского РЎРѕСЋР · Р ° РљСѓР · РЅРµС † РѕРІВ »РІС‹ РїРѕР »РЅРёР» стрельР± С‹ РИРѕ РјРѕСЂСЃР †Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р », СЃРѕРѕР ± С ‰ РёР» Р ° пресс-СЃР »СѓР¶Р ± Р ° Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


"Admiral Kuznetsov" shot out on a training goal in the Barents Sea


“Shooting was conducted in the waters of the Barents Sea. The exposed sea target was successfully hit, ”the release says.

The ministry noted that the aircraft carrier "continues to carry out planned tasks for the program of the course of combat training."

R R ° RЅRμRμ In "RЅR ° RЅRμRј SЃRѕSЃS,RѕSЏR" P ° SЃSЊ RїSЂRѕRІRμSЂRєR ° F ± RѕSЂS,RѕRІS <SЂR ° C RґRoRѕS,RμS ... ... ... RЅRoS ‡ RμSЃRєRoS SЃRoSЃS,RμRј Ryo RѕR RѕSЂSѓRґRѕRІR ° ± RЅRoSЏ, PI SЂR ° RјRєR ° С ... которой Р ± С ‹Р» Рё РїСЂРѕРІРµРґРµРЅС ‹РѕР ± Р» С'С‚С ‹РєРѕСЂР ° Р ± Р» СЏ СЃР ° РјРѕР »С'тР° РјРё РєРѕСЂР ° СЊРЅРѕРіРѕ истреР± ительного Р ° РІРёР ° РїРѕР» РєР ° РјРѕСЂСЃРєРѕР№ aviation Северного С „Р» отР° РЎСѓ-33 Рё РЎСѓ-25 СЃ Р ° СЌСЂРѕРґСЂРѕРјР ° СевероморЁР°Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° С °Р °Р °Р ° С °Р °Р ° С
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 27 October 2015 13: 43 New
    -8
    It's time to set goals in the Mediterranean.
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 27 October 2015 13: 49 New
      12
      Aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov” fired for training purposes in the Barents Sea

      Since when did Kuznetsov suddenly become an Aircraft Carrier ??? belay
      All my life I was TAKR (heavy aircraft carrier cruiser). Did I miss something? Not? We HAVE NO AIRPLANES. But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier. Details are naturally secret for now. But this alone is already very pleasing! good
      1. Now we are free
        Now we are free 27 October 2015 14: 02 New
        14
        “Kuzya” would have looked nice in the Mediterranean Sea, and by the way, the Russian Defense Ministry is talking about it louder. If Kuznetsov was sent to the shores of Syria, then the practice of using TAKR to support the Russian Air Force in this country would be very helpful, but in the history of the modern Russian Navy this will be the first time.

        PS
        And I could not help but share another news, especially it will be interesting for sports fans. Boxer Roy Jones received a Russian passport! bully

        (Image is clickable)
        1. Snegovok
          Snegovok 27 October 2015 17: 47 New
          +2
          Date of issue 17.09.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX ??
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. g1v2
        g1v2 27 October 2015 14: 06 New
        +8
        Can you link to the official summary of the conclusion of the construction contract? So far, none of these messages have been confirmed. As a rule, such messages are thrown by the scientific center of them. Krylova, who developed the initial project of the aircraft carrier "Storm" and really want to promote the MO for a delicious multi-billion dollar contract. About secrecy is not even funny - you cannot hide the construction of a ship with a displacement of 100 thousand tons, especially since the shipyards that are able to build it in spite of it. Well and most importantly - in the plans for the state order until 2020, no new aircraft carriers are provided for. Perhaps something else was implied - in the next couple of years, Kuzyu is planned to begin to be rebuilt into a full-fledged aircraft carrier with the replacement of a geu, air defense and an increase in the number of aircraft due to the dismantling of PCRs and an increase in hangars. Here it was in the plans, and if not for the conflict in dill, modernization might have already begun. Well, all the info about any new aircraft carrier still turned out to be a throw-in and an attempt to promote the MO.
      4. Deniska
        Deniska 27 October 2015 14: 10 New
        +2
        has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier


        From where infa?
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 27 October 2015 16: 23 New
          -1
          Quote: Deniska
          has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier


          From where infa?

          A month ago, on TV we were talking. And if you want a reference, here you go: http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/AW_XXI_01.html
      5. 31rus
        31rus 27 October 2015 14: 21 New
        0
        Where does this information come from, dear? Please give a source.
      6. 31rus
        31rus 27 October 2015 14: 21 New
        0
        Where does this information come from, dear? Please give a source.
      7. Fin
        Fin 27 October 2015 14: 38 New
        +4
        Quote: GSH-18
        All my life I was TAKR (heavy aircraft carrier cruiser).

        To be precise, TAVKR. And TAKR is Peter the Great.
        1. bugagich
          bugagich 24 September 2016 15: 52 New
          0
          Peter the Great is a TARK, although the mortgage is "Heavy Missile Cruiser." and Kuznetsov, like the rest, called TAKR, later TAVKR, which are one and the same thing.
          moreover, it’s correct not “aircraft carrier”, but “aircraft carrier” ...
      8. Peterhof 73
        Peterhof 73 27 October 2015 14: 42 New
        +1
        To you +. Only in my opinion not TAKR but TAVKR. And let me know the source of information about the construction of an aircraft carrier.
        Quote: GSH-18
        Aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov” fired for training purposes in the Barents Sea

        Since when did Kuznetsov suddenly become an Aircraft Carrier ??? belay
        All my life I was TAKR (heavy aircraft carrier cruiser). Did I miss something? Not? We HAVE NO AIRPLANES. But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier. Details are naturally secret for now. But this alone is already very pleasing! good
      9. KGB WATCH YOU
        KGB WATCH YOU 27 October 2015 18: 31 New
        0
        But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with OSK for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier. Details are naturally secret while.


        Can I tell you how you found this out? It's just that no one knows how.
      10. PSih2097
        PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 17 New
        0
        Quote: GSH-18
        But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with OSK for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier.

        nifiga, springboard is obligatory, so two catapults ... like on Ulyanovsk ...
        as for me, the main thing is to make the Yak-44 ...
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 27 October 2015 13: 53 New
      +5
      The aircraft carrier cruiser SF "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov" fired at a sea target from the air defense missile system "Dagger"

      Who wrote this? What is the name of this journalist ?? lol
      Fired on sea targets from the "Dagger" anti-aircraft missile system. AS??? request SAM firing actually on air targets. And did they train with earth-to-earth missiles? laughing We wear everything round, we roll everything square? laughing Well, the journalists give!
      1. Vladimyrych
        Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 14: 00 New
        11
        Look at this plot. It describes the impact of air defense systems on surface targets

        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 27 October 2015 14: 29 New
          -3
          Quote: Vladimir
          Look at this plot. It describes the impact of air defense systems on surface targets

          Did you yourself carefully watch the plot you presented? It says: The consumption of missiles-3, one anti-aircraft, the one that was released as a warning and fell somewhere between Georgian ships, that is, they didn’t aim anywhere, and shot in order to maintain the main anti-ship ammunition.
          1. Vladimyrych
            Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 14: 32 New
            +3
            Well, you are not careful. In the second salvo, the Mirage opened fire on the Osa air defense system and hit the side.
            This second boat video even CNN showed
            1. GSH-18
              GSH-18 27 October 2015 15: 55 New
              0
              In the Osa-AKM missile complex, the radio fuse was modified and the possibility of destruction was ensured at almost zero helicopter height at ranges from 2 to 6,5 km. This ensures the defeat of both helicopters hovering and flying at a speed of up to 80 m / s.

              Source: http://www.modernarmy.ru/article/232 © Portal "Modern Army"

              These missiles are anti-aircraft, that is, their power is not intended to destroy large targets, such as a ship. You can certainly get the whole "clip". But this will be the misuse of expensive anti-aircraft missiles. Than then you will shoot back from planes, if what? This is done in extreme cases, when there’s nothing to shoot (the weight of the Wasp warhead is 15 kg in total!). Here is the opposite situation, to enter the Onyx tank. And Th, also guaranteed to ebb! wassat Yes, along with the tank, another half of the city block to dust.
              1. tlauicol
                tlauicol 27 October 2015 16: 15 New
                +3
                just two hours ago you didn’t believe in such an opportunity at all. and now get out
                1. Talgat
                  Talgat 27 October 2015 17: 14 New
                  0
                  Many naval air defense systems are capable of firing at surface targets

                  I read exactly about Osa - and about marine variants with 300 - I also read - they can hit ships if necessary
            2. GSH-18
              GSH-18 27 October 2015 16: 19 New
              0
              Quote: Vladimir
              Well, you are not careful

              Watch carefully. Consumption of rockets PKR-2 anti-aircraft-1. Review and hear everything!
              1. Vladimyrych
                Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 16: 45 New
                +2
                Cost
                1) RCC - 2pcs - drowned and the first Georgian "hero" did not return to base.
                2) SAM "Osa" - 2pcs
                They started one as a warning.
                The second got on board smoked (and the drown at the base in Poti wink ) The second Georgian "hero".
                The video above is attached.
                Why the result is announced without one air defense system is to the editors of the channel. For me it is not critical.
      2. figwam
        figwam 27 October 2015 14: 04 New
        0
        The aircraft-carrying cruiser of the SF “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov” carried out firing at a naval target from the “Dagger” air defense system, the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported.

        The S-300 can also hit ground targets.
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 27 October 2015 14: 32 New
          -1
          Quote: figvam
          The aircraft-carrying cruiser of the SF “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov” carried out firing at a naval target from the “Dagger” air defense system, the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported.

          The S-300 can also hit ground targets.

          Yes, and anti-tank systems can be fired at helicopters. So what? And from AK in general, you can beat anything for anything! lol
          I mean, weapons systems are not just narrowly unified.
          1. 31rus
            31rus 27 October 2015 14: 37 New
            +3
            Dear GSh-18, ZRAK "Dirk / Chestnut", from the very beginning it is designed to combat airborne and small-sized sea targets
            1. GSH-18
              GSH-18 27 October 2015 16: 09 New
              -1
              Quote: 31rus
              Dear GSh-18, ZRAK "Dirk / Chestnut", from the very beginning it is designed to combat airborne and small-sized sea targets

              I agree with you. This is such a unification both on land and by air. It is small-sized marine. But because of this, the effectiveness of use against aircraft and cruise missiles is reduced, the probability of hitting an aerodynamic target is 0,4-0,7 2005 data.
          2. 31rus
            31rus 27 October 2015 14: 37 New
            0
            Dear GSh-18, ZRAK "Dirk / Chestnut", from the very beginning it is designed to combat airborne and small-sized sea targets
          3. tlauicol
            tlauicol 27 October 2015 15: 07 New
            +3
            SAM with a semi-active and active GOS may well hit surface targets within the radio horizon (for the Dagger, 15 kilometers), if they are illuminated from the ship. since the 60s yes
        2. GSH-18
          GSH-18 27 October 2015 16: 00 New
          0
          Quote: figvam
          The aircraft-carrying cruiser of the SF “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov” carried out firing at a naval target from the “Dagger” air defense system, the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported.

          The S-300 can also hit ground targets.

          This is an option, not a primary purpose.
          1. Throw
            Throw 27 October 2015 18: 37 New
            0
            This is not an “option”, but the property of some extreme SAM systems in service is the good selectivity of the RE systems, which makes it possible to hit targets both in interference conditions and against the background of the underlying surface at zero altitudes.

            Moreover, 300ka can generally shoot at a target, incl. ground, which is not highlighted, i.e. just by the coordinates of the control unit, like a tactical missile.
            And a hundred kg of TNT and 20 of thousands of destructive elements were shrapnel ... am
      3. Mavric
        Mavric 27 October 2015 14: 08 New
        +2
        Normally he shoots from the "Dagger", there is a television. Through it you can at least shoot someone. AK 630 is the same as for air defense, nevertheless it normally shoots at everything, air-blast capabilities (vertical aiming angles) allow it quite well.
      4. kepmor
        kepmor 27 October 2015 14: 29 New
        +3
        They shoot, and how! Remember the “naval battle with the Georgian fleet” in 2008. The Albros (1124M) successfully shot at their boats from the Osa-MA air defense system. Itself commanded in the 90s such a ship, but only fired at the CC.
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. gjv
        gjv 27 October 2015 17: 04 New
        +2
        Quote: GSH-18
        Who wrote this? What is the name of this journalist ??

        Ask this question to the Press Service of the Northern Fleet (Severomorsk).
        Serga Vadim Aleksandrovich, Head of the Press Service of the Northern Fleet (Severomorsk)
        Phone: 8 (81537) 46810, 8 (8152) 641041
        Email: [email protected]
        In general, here's a video from Vladimirich below essentially shows the possibility of such firing.
      7. Army1
        Army1 27 October 2015 22: 24 New
        0
        Quote: GSH-18
        The aircraft carrier cruiser SF "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov" fired at a sea target from the air defense missile system "Dagger"

        Who wrote this? What is the name of this journalist ?? lol
        Fired on sea targets from the "Dagger" anti-aircraft missile system. AS??? request SAM firing actually on air targets. And did they train with earth-to-earth missiles? laughing We wear everything round, we roll everything square? laughing Well, the journalists give!

        I will tell you a secret in the case of naval battle, the reaction rate of the air defense missile system is faster than the PCR, and they do an excellent job with this task within the radio range.
      8. PSih2097
        PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 20 New
        0
        Quote: GSH-18
        Fired at a sea target from the anti-aircraft missile system "Dagger".

        maybe the P-700 was shot on the eve of kapitalki? Although they removed it, horseradish knows when ...
      9. The comment was deleted.
    3. upadeishev
      upadeishev 27 October 2015 14: 09 New
      0
      and the Caribbean ....
    4. marlin1203
      marlin1203 27 October 2015 15: 34 New
      +1
      Why is everyone so happy? He shot himself with a "dagger", i.e. complex air defense medium-short range. He generally has an air wing for air cover, which is much more effective. And this miracle ship is called abbreviated TAVKR. So he is a cruiser because he carries 12 × PKK 4K80 Granit, but this is already serious. But for some reason I didn’t hear that he was fired by this most powerful anti-ship strike system in our fleet today. Maybe someone in the subject? What's the matter? Save? laughing
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 13: 48 New
      +1
      They match him with a MIG-29KUB. Already experiencing.

      GSH-18 and what do I have to do with it? hi Infa longtime.
      And a huge pile of articles.
      Example:
      http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/762134/
      1. GSH-18
        GSH-18 27 October 2015 14: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Vladimir
        They match him with a MIG-29KUB. Already experiencing.

        This is complete crap. You can not remove the Su-33! These Migi in comparison with Sushki look like flies. And the combat capabilities, respectively, are at least halved.
        My opinion: mainly Sushki should be based on aircraft-carrying cruisers and our future Aircraft carriers.
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 23 New
          0
          Mig complements and replaces when writing off sushi (ATP Poghosyan for Su35, which is not soiled) ...
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 27 October 2015 13: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: MainBeam
      He should go to Cuba
      with a full set of Su-33 and Su-25 on board.

      And why on the deck of the Kuzi SU-25 UTG - “doves of the world”? wink
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. maxim1987
        maxim1987 27 October 2015 14: 01 New
        0
        Quote: Alexey RA
        And why on the deck of the Kuzi SU-25 UTG - “doves of the world”?

        Su-25 served as targets. and not part of the air group
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Andy
        Andy 27 October 2015 14: 08 New
        0
        Quote: Alexey RA
        And why on the deck of the Kuzi SU-25 UTG - “doves of the world”?


        educational training. eaglets learn to fly! something like this wink
      5. The comment was deleted.
    3. Thronekeeper
      Thronekeeper 27 October 2015 13: 53 New
      0
      The Su-30CM2 wetting program was launched only now, and it was necessary to start the day before yesterday. Or “Irbis” put on everything Su-33e. So the Su-33 aircraft is almost the most obsolete by avionics of all our “Flankers”, ground updates that did not “grow old” on the airframe and were not torn apart under EBNism.
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 27 New
        0
        Quote: Thronekeeper
        The Su-30CM2 wetting program was launched only now, and it was necessary to start the day before yesterday.

        As for me, these are much better, the more they were created for Ulyanovsk.

        and Poghosyan K.O.Z.E.L
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. DenZ
      DenZ 27 October 2015 13: 54 New
      +2
      Quote: MainBeam
      To Cuba, he would have to go with a complete set of Su-33 and Su-25 on board.

      In case of a serious mess, this is a one-way ticket. Without options. To demonstrate the flag is possible.
      1. Mainbeam
        Mainbeam 27 October 2015 14: 01 New
        0
        Quote: DenZ
        In the case of a serious mess, this is a one-way ticket. No options.

        In the case of a serious mess, there is one option.
        But you can show off in full.
        Especially with the submarine under the keel with the "calibers" on board.

        Quote: DenZ
        Demonstrate the flag - it is possible.

        It is necessary to distract the Yankos from Syria, then there were recommendations on the introduction of troops into Syria and Iraq.
        And with the “Kuzey” off its shores, and even with the Su-25 on board ... Tickled in the groin
        .
  3. Teberii
    Teberii 27 October 2015 13: 44 New
    0
    The planned exercises once again showed that we are peaceful people, but our armored train is always ready.
  4. maxim1987
    maxim1987 27 October 2015 13: 45 New
    +1
    Kuzya once again showed that it is not just a platform for aircraft
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Manul
    Manul 27 October 2015 13: 52 New
    0
    And his "Granites" ever made launches?
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 13: 54 New
      0
      As far as is known, the Granite mines at Kuzi are flooded.
      1. gispanec
        gispanec 27 October 2015 14: 29 New
        +1
        so granites have a raw start
        1. Manul
          Manul 28 October 2015 01: 20 New
          0
          Quote: gispanec
          so granites have a raw start

          Dear, so will someone tell me? Shoot Kuzya Granites at least once in his life, or not?
          As I understand it, I should have done it somewhere, but it’s interesting to me - it’s really such that an aircraft carrier simultaneously launches missiles, and at the same time planes take off from it ..?
  7. favn
    favn 27 October 2015 13: 52 New
    0
    Clarify who knows, the Dagger air defense missile defense system has learned to hit "set naval targets"? I believed that he works exclusively for air targets. Not?
    1. Manul
      Manul 28 October 2015 01: 26 New
      0
      Quote: favn
      Clarify who knows, the Dagger air defense missile defense system has learned to hit "set naval targets"? I believed that he works exclusively for air targets. Not?

      Look for information how during the 2008 Georgian conflict, our ships with the help of the Osa reassured the Georgian squadron. There was an article about it in VO.
  8. Engineer
    Engineer 27 October 2015 14: 04 New
    11
    Yes, it is outdated, it has an archaic power plant, there are no catapults, it drags anti-ship missiles taking the place of aircraft hangars, an inferior wing without AWACS planes ... but it is, it is ours, and it’s damn charismatic.
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 27 October 2015 14: 16 New
      +1
      As far as I remember, its main advantage is autonomy. He can defend himself, and even attack if necessary. Unlike purebred aircraft carriers that can only drown on their own, they also use cover, escort and supply ships.
  9. huntsman650
    huntsman650 27 October 2015 14: 33 New
    +4
    Exploited this air defense missile 13 years. This is an analogue of the ground top missile defense system. There are 4 of them at Kuz. Able to accompany and fire at 4 targets at the same time each sight. there is a mode of firing at a sea target, while the rocket has a hardened radio fuse and the missile is guided by a missile slide, i.e. hits from above, detonation is carried out at the target, non-contact.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 27 October 2015 14: 41 New
      0
      In principle, everything is correct, only additives and artillery and another correction on the “Kuz” there are 8
  10. Dan Slav
    Dan Slav 27 October 2015 15: 18 New
    0
    System check in progress. So, they are preparing for something. For a long trip or what?
    The former chief of staff says that soon there will be a sandstorm season in Syria.
    Will it be possible to fly from land? Or do we have to drive our Kuzyu there !?
  11. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 27 October 2015 15: 39 New
    0
    The offensive choked. Now there will be everything else, and land and ships.
  12. Hammer
    Hammer 27 October 2015 15: 44 New
    0
    maybe even here they will tell me where you looked at Kuzi anti-ship missiles?
    1. huntsman650
      huntsman650 27 October 2015 17: 28 New
      0
      According to the project, they are there, it is called an entom cruiser, but in fact .... it's a secret
    2. cormorant
      cormorant 27 October 2015 18: 16 New
      +1
      Here they lurk ...
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 30 New
        0
        Quote: cormorant
        Here they lurk ...

        there is not a damn ... in the 2000s flooded ...
      2. PSih2097
        PSih2097 27 October 2015 23: 30 New
        0
        Quote: cormorant
        Here they lurk ...

        there is not a damn ... in the 2000s flooded ...
  13. huntsman650
    huntsman650 27 October 2015 16: 57 New
    0
    Quote: 31rus
    In principle, everything is correct, only additives and artillery and another correction on the “Kuz” there are 8

    SAM "Dagger" on the Kuze 4 pcs. Sit down for you 2 points.
    taken from here http://dokwar.ru/publ/vooruzhenie/aviacija_i_flot/avianosec_admiral_kuznecov/15-
    1-0-107
    Anti-aircraft missile armament - 4 modules of the Dagger air defense system (192 SAMs) and 8 modules of the Kortik air defense missile system (256 missiles and 48 000-mm shells) located on the sponsors side-by-side, provide the possibility of circular firing of air targets.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 27 October 2015 23: 26 New
      +1
      I’m sorry, I’ve said “Dirk”, it was about him, so I went in cycles
    2. 31rus
      31rus 27 October 2015 23: 26 New
      0
      I’m sorry, I’ve said “Dirk”, it was about him, so I went in cycles
  14. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 17: 30 New
    +1
    Quote: oleg-gr
    It's time to set goals in the Mediterranean

    No, on Mars ....

    Quote: GSH-18
    Aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov” fired for training purposes in the Barents Sea

    Since when did Kuznetsov suddenly become an Aircraft Carrier ??? belay
    All my life I was TAKR (heavy aircraft carrier cruiser). Did I miss something? Not? We HAVE NO AIRPLANES. But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier. Details are naturally secret for now. But this alone is already very pleasing! good

    And as a TAKER, it does not exist, since there are no "granites" on it. That is, there is no cruiser from it. Aircraft carrier - at the very least, but at least some

    Quote: Now we are free
    If Kuznetsov sent to the shores of Syria

    In 2015, they definitely won’t send it, it seems like they do not plan ...

    Quote: g1v2
    Can you link to the official summary of the conclusion of the construction contract?

    How can you not understand. The data is SECRET. An agreement was signed for the construction of an aircraft carrier, which has not yet been adopted an advance project. Except as a model and schemes - nothing. But the contract is concluded ...

    Quote: GSH-18
    http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/AW_XXI_01.html

    Well ... however.
    Did you read the article itself? But it says there:
    Russian Ministry of Defense ordered United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) advance project development promising aircraft carrier cruiser. This, according to Interfax, said Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov. He noted that funding for the construction of such ships by the state arms program of Russia for 2011-2020 is not provided. "Until 2020, this money is not, and we do not plan", the minister noted.
    Even taking into account that this was said by Serdyukov, nothing has changed. For a year or two, you can’t go from an advance project to a technical project, even if you really want to. Moreover, it will be necessary to build cooperation from scratch. Talking about building an aircraft carrier now is about the same as talking about building a spaceship for research by Alpha Centauri

    Quote: GSH-18
    Fired at a sea target from the anti-aircraft missile system "Dagger".
  15. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 27 October 2015 20: 54 New
    0
    Quote: GSH-18
    Aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov” fired for training purposes in the Barents Sea

    Since when did Kuznetsov suddenly become an Aircraft Carrier ??? belay
    All my life I was TAKR (heavy aircraft carrier cruiser). Did I miss something? Not? We HAVE NO AIRPLANES. But the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already signed an agreement with USC for the construction of the first flat-deck Russian Aircraft Carrier. Details are naturally secret for now. But this alone is already very pleasing! good
    But wasn’t they called him so that the Bosporus and Dardanelles could pass without problems? Normal aircraft carrier.
  16. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 22: 44 New
    0
    Quote: Denis-Skiff
    But wasn’t they called him so that the Bosporus and Dardanelles could pass without problems? Normal aircraft carrier.

    Our leadership for aircraft carriers has always had very "tender feelings." Khrushchev also called aircraft carriers "weapons of aggression." How then to call an aircraft carrier aircraft carrier. And this had nothing to do with the straits.
  17. Zomanus
    Zomanus 28 October 2015 04: 05 New
    -1
    But it would be nice to “Kuzyu” “reflash” under Caliber.
    I think that there will be enough space for at least one launcher for eight cells.
    Although it probably already makes no sense ...
  18. Old26
    Old26 28 October 2015 07: 35 New
    +1
    Quote: Zomanus
    But it would be nice to “Kuzyu” “reflash” under Caliber.
    I think that there will be enough space for at least one launcher for eight cells.
    Although it probably already makes no sense ...

    NAFIGA ????????? Here explain to me what kind of mania it is, where it is necessary, and where it is not necessary to cling "CALIBERS"? So that he is equal in impact capabilities to the ship "river-sea"? Why does an aircraft carrier need subsonic weapons, be it anti-ship missiles or ship-to-ground missiles ??? Is it intended to come closer to shore and launch such cruise missiles overland77? And it’s not better not to make it out of the ship that: either undercruiser, or undercruiser, and do as all normal people do. Impact weapons on escort ships, aviation on an aircraft carrier
  19. YaMZ-238
    YaMZ-238 28 October 2015 09: 38 New
    0
    Well done !!!! They are on combat duty while we are working here in Mother Russia! Protect from adversaries! Now you can relax a bit)))