Chinese Foreign Minister: We call on the American side not to take rash actions

67
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi commented on media reports that an American destroyer could go to the controversial Nansha (Spratly) islands located in the South China Sea, urging the United States to "think well" and refrain from "rash actions."



“We are now checking relevant information, if this is true, then we urge the American side to think carefully about their upcoming steps, not to take rash actions and not to create an incident from scratch,” the RIA Minister’s statement says "News".

Earlier, a similar statement was made by the representative of the Chinese Embassy in Washington, noting that the United States must stop provocations in order to maintain peace and stability in the region.

"Freedom of navigation and overflights should not be used as an excuse for muscle flexing and undermining the sovereignty and security of other countries," said embassy spokesman Zhu Haiquan.

Earlier, Reuters reported that Washington plans to send the Lassen destroyer Lassen to the 12 mile zone of Chinese artificial islands, accompanied by the P-8A reconnaissance aircraft.
  • http://www.freewebs.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +51
    27 October 2015 09: 57
    "Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi ..."
    It would sound more formidable if the minister were Yi Wang! smile
    1. -1
      27 October 2015 10: 08
      Chinese attempts to shake the air. Do not breathe and do not fart in our direction. Pretend to be strong be able to give change. Watching is embarrassing. But consumer goods overwhelmed the whole world.
      1. -4
        27 October 2015 10: 12
        Quote: Scandinavian
        Chinese attempts to shake the air. Do not breathe and do not fart in our direction. Pretend to be strong be able to give change. Watching is embarrassing. But consumer goods overwhelmed the whole world.

        Exactly. I have long been saying that China’s military might is a soap bubble. A vivid example of Syria.
        1. +20
          27 October 2015 10: 34
          Quote: wild
          I have long been saying that China’s military might is a soap bubble. A vivid example of Syria.

          Syria is here what side? And about the soap bubble. The Chinese in the Korean War put American cancer without any one thousand first Chinese warnings
          1. -4
            27 October 2015 12: 37
            Quote: Tusv
            Quote: wild
            I have long been saying that China’s military might is a soap bubble. A vivid example of Syria.

            Syria is here what side? And about the soap bubble. The Chinese in the Korean War put American cancer without any one thousand first Chinese warnings

            Ale wake up respected. China fought with meat in Korea and practically pissed away everything. Seoul took ???? And Syria, after all, they didn’t go to the coalition, but of all the joint exercises of the Russian Federation and China, plus competitions where China won on its equipment ???
        2. +9
          27 October 2015 11: 11
          They also spoke in the West about Russia.
          And then they almost got over when Russia launched 26 missiles from the sea for more than a thousand kilometers and shamed the coalition in Syria with a more effective strategy.
          1. +1
            27 October 2015 13: 09
            Quote: theadenter
            They also spoke in the West about Russia.
            And then they almost got over when Russia launched 26 missiles from the sea for more than a thousand kilometers and shamed the coalition in Syria with a more effective strategy.

            Now when they’ll do something similar then you can say, but for now ......, but there is a possibility to show the same states your mosh coalition with the Russian Federation, Iran in Syria. What are they not doing? The answer arises by itself, cannot
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        27 October 2015 10: 47
        It is necessary to lease the Chinese for a couple of flights of the "Khibiny" ... You look at the next crew of some Pindo ship. Sii will write a letter of dismissal ... laughing
        1. +4
          27 October 2015 14: 13
          The Chinese are generally dangerous to give anything. Even for rent.
          1. Quote: theadenter
            The Chinese are generally dangerous to give anything. Even for rent.


            I completely agree, they will immediately have a bunch of shitty copies.
      4. +6
        27 October 2015 10: 55
        Quote: Scandinavian
        Chinese attempts to shake the air. Do not breathe and do not fart in our direction. Pretend to be strong be able to give change. Watching is embarrassing. But consumer goods overwhelmed the whole world.

        What are you proposing to China?) Probably to break commercial and intellectual ties with the United States and its allies?) At the moment, China does not have the strength to oppose the United States, and even more so in conjunction with its allies, it is not a fact that China will cope with the Navy Japan.

        Let's think, they are severing all ties, stagnation and further economic recession are under way. The Navy is an expensive pleasure, in order to make it, at least equal to the United States it is necessary to invest a lot of money, and not say "right now, we are like". But as long as the US has the dominant role of the Navy and has a printing press, it will not allow equalizing the parity, because China is pressing the economy bypassing issues of domination and giving the US a reason to relax a little.
        1. +2
          27 October 2015 11: 00
          Quote: Phantom Revolution
          not the fact that China will cope with the Japanese Navy.

          That's just with Yap, he will cope lightly! That’s why there the Americanoses fit in with their narrow-eyed dogs for their destroyers!
        2. 0
          27 October 2015 14: 23
          Oh shit myself, opened Wikipedia, read about the "funny Japanese fleet" ... Yeah, it seems I was severely mistaken about their defenses.
        3. +2
          27 October 2015 17: 22
          China, what is really there to bend the soul, an open aggressor for "squeezing" the islands. We cover him (close our eyes to this) only because they seem to be our allies (what else needs to be proved, not only with rare statements).
          And all of China's actions with the islands copy the US policy with its hypocrisy "we squeeze out insolent, but we will declare that nothing is happening, and that anyone is aggressive, but not us."
          1. 0
            27 October 2015 20: 45
            Nosgoth

            You correctly noticed. China he is such a China.

            It is said that only in China did the Jews not find yet another of their tribes.
        4. 0
          27 October 2015 20: 10
          Phantom Revolution

          The United States with the economy, too, is not very. But this is not important.

          And the following is important. There are 3 countries in the world that, with a certain significant potential, can control each other by entering into alliances against the hegemon. The overall potential of the two countries is always higher than that of one. This is the key to stability. At the same time, a good benefit also looms. There is no need to conduct an arms race to the extent that when two countries put their economies in a confrontation in order to achieve exactly the same result.

          However, local conflicts are quite possible without a general rebalancing. But a serious mess has gone down in history.
      5. +3
        27 October 2015 10: 56
        Quote: Scandinavian
        Chinese attempts to shake the air. Do not breathe and do not fart in our direction. Pretend to be strong be able to give change. Watching is embarrassing. But consumer goods overwhelmed the whole world.

        As for consumer goods, I completely agree.
        But lately, the Chinese have stamped a pretty small-town fleet, and even the states have to reckon with this. After all, everyone understands that things should not come to shooting under any circumstances! All that remains is to rattle one weapon, play with muscles and try to scare each other request
    2. +4
      27 October 2015 11: 16
      fellow SRC P-15 ..... "Minister of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China Wang Yi ..."
      It would sound more formidable if the minister were Yi Wang!


      This is in vain. You burned our resident so easily.
    3. 0
      27 October 2015 12: 15
      A subtle hint of thick circumstances.
  2. +12
    27 October 2015 09: 58
    Well then, let's look at what the Chinese are capable of. We on the Black Sea a year and a half ago quickly explained to Amers where their place is.
    1. +7
      27 October 2015 10: 02
      Quote: Barboskin
      Well then, let's look at what the Chinese are capable of.

      We will see. Is this another "last Chinese warning" or some real steps will follow. And the Americans are still those provocateurs, yes.
    2. +1
      27 October 2015 10: 57
      Quote: Barboskin
      Well then, let's look at what the Chinese are capable of. We on the Black Sea a year and a half ago quickly explained to Amers where their place is.

      This is YES! good
  3. +4
    27 October 2015 09: 58
    then we urge the American side to think carefully about their upcoming steps


    I don’t remember that such calls stopped the USA from expansion all over the world.

    But if Khrushchev’s shoe is to be attached to such calls from the UN rostrum, it will be much more effective.
    1. +1
      27 October 2015 12: 51
      But if Khrushchev’s shoe is to be attached to such calls from the UN rostrum, it will be much more effective.


      In fact, Khrushch also had a vigorous "Kuz'kina mother" in addition to his shoe. But the Chinese are not so happy with this. It seems that there is also vigorous, but some, for the most part, short-lived and generally not enough.
      1. 0
        27 October 2015 20: 51
        Alicante

        Duck and the Russian Federation at hand with their missiles. If anything...

        With triumvirate, what matters? Trust is important. But as our ancestors taught, trust but verify.

        And therefore, a good level of trade between the three countries is just what should be in the next decade.
  4. +3
    27 October 2015 09: 59
    The Chinese need to learn from Anatoly Ivanovich how to drive the Americans back from their waters.
    1. +1
      27 October 2015 10: 57
      Quote: Engineer
      The Chinese need to learn from Anatoly Ivanovich how to drive the Americans back from their waters.


      Everything is simple. Ivanovich, they remain Ivanovich in China !!! Do not twist. The situation is ripening slowly! Only the lazy one doesn’t run into the p.ind.osov. And this is just the beginning ....
  5. +5
    27 October 2015 09: 59
    As always, an empty diplomatic skirmish. The Chinese will not go against the United States. They and the Japanese, for Senkaku, so only prescribe ritual dances on the water. soldier
    1. +7
      27 October 2015 10: 13
      The Chinese have invested a lot of money in building and equipping the islands, perfectly understanding the consequences and possible moves of their opponents. Ship dispatch is the most anticipated of the expected. I think there are 100500 ways to make mattresses unhappy.
      1. 0
        27 October 2015 13: 59
        The Chinese are just doing nothing ... Counting moves, anyway ...
    2. +3
      27 October 2015 10: 33
      So I think they will meet at the border of territorial waters and try to "push out in bulk", mattress mats will lose their nostrils - they will make themselves worse, and the Chinese correctly said, from scratch, and the whole world will look and laugh at how those skis are wrapped. The Chinese can already afford it. And this is not "the last Chinese warning" and not only to the Americans.
  6. +2
    27 October 2015 10: 00
    It is customary for people to do first, and then think how to make excuses ...
  7. DDR
    -2
    27 October 2015 10: 00
    Or maybe a couple of "khibins" to the Chinese? Only, mind you with a return !!!
  8. +4
    27 October 2015 10: 00
    It will run into the USA on a zugunder.
  9. +3
    27 October 2015 10: 01
    The Chinese need to "bulk" displace the ship, like the USSR in its time. And when building new ships, you can strengthen the nose, you can weld a titanium ram, so that the damage is greater in case of bulk.
    1. +1
      27 October 2015 11: 22
      Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
      The Chinese need to "bulk" displace the ship, like the USSR in its time. And when building new ships, you can strengthen the nose, you can weld a titanium ram, so that the damage is greater in case of bulk.

      Not necessary. Before the bulk, give the team sledgehammers grinders and crowbars, and only the trough sailing will return home to the states! laughing
  10. +9
    27 October 2015 10: 04
    Oh kai. Well, they sent 3,14s their destroyer to the zone of the disputed islands. What's next? Unleash a war with China - the navel will sooner unleash, and not so much there (in the mattress), everything with a dust bag over the head is ...
    Ponty clumsy pounding and nothing more. I wonder how the destroyer’s crew will feel in such an environment.
    1. mvg
      +7
      27 October 2015 11: 16
      No way, another 63 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 10 aircraft carriers will sail ... That's all ...
      1. +4
        27 October 2015 11: 26
        Quote: mvg
        No way, another 63 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 10 aircraft carriers will sail ... That's all ...

        No one will sail anywhere. The states will not start a war with China under any circumstances. They are the carriers who are chasing the banana republics with the goal of taking them to fright. With the Chinese (especially at home!) This option will not work.
        1. +1
          27 October 2015 12: 28
          Quote: GSH-18
          GS-18 (6) Today, 11:26 ↑
          Quote: mvg
          No way, another 63 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 10 aircraft carriers will sail ... That's all ...
          No one will sail anywhere. The states will not start a war with China under any circumstances. They are the carriers who are chasing the banana republics with the goal of taking them to fright. With the Chinese (especially at home!) This option will not work.

          Are you sure about this? Where did you get this confidence? But they will take and sail. And they will sail with all the composition that the comrade from above has indicated. And when they come, they will say ... "Oh, you ... dance cross-nosed, yellow-eyed, narrow-eyed, narrow-film !!!" And they will smear the Han people on the sea like plasticine on a table. And then what?! But they will smear it if they only want to. All hope that they will not want to. Say what's wrong, isn't it?
          1. +2
            27 October 2015 12: 49
            Quote: svelto
            ? But they’ll take it and sail.

            Excuse me, but why ??? I don't think you will challenge China's high military potential? Now consider the many Chinese diasporas around the world. Are you sure that in the same USA they are all just "Americans" of only Chinese nationality? China, in my opinion, is a very dangerous adversary militarily. And the states are unlikely to dare to go to war with them ...
          2. 0
            27 October 2015 15: 45
            Quote: svelto
            But they will take and sail. And they will sail with all the composition that the comrade from above has indicated. And when they come, they will say ... "Oh, you ... dance cross-nosed, yellow-eyed, narrow-eyed, narrow-film !!!" And they will smear the Han people on the sea like plasticine on a table. And then what?! But they will smear it if they only want to. All hope that they will not want to. Say what's wrong, isn't it?

            Relax. The United States still has brains in place. They will not attack the PRC. Everything is very simple. China is a nuclear power.
      2. 0
        27 October 2015 17: 22
        And they will be together carried away by fire from the mainland. And if they also come together at 1 point, then there are a couple of tactical nuclear shells for this whole group. The United States will not be able to do anything to China until they have a good bridgehead on the mainland.
  11. +9
    27 October 2015 10: 05
    Whatever it was, but China pulled the States. And they really don't like it.
    1. +1
      27 October 2015 14: 03
      The construction of the islands, China has already bent the authority of mattresses ...
  12. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 06
    Quote: SRC P-15
    "Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi ..."
    It would sound more formidable if the minister were Yi Wang! smile
    laughing

    AND VAN SU 24TH (KHIBINOV).
  13. +4
    27 October 2015 10: 06
    "You can't sit on two chairs at once" The states want to sit on many chairs at once. It's time to hurt yourself. Or will they give up something of their own if they are building a face against China? You can't keep up everywhere. As comrades commentators correctly note, the farts will explode!
  14. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 08
    If you try to take the point of view of amers (although it’s very dangerous, considering where they are used to sticking their members), anyway some kind of madness - they are trying simultaneously resist against Russia and China.

    Against Russia-they will not stand in the military plan.

    Against China - in the economic.

    The Chinese, of course, are very cunning, but they will not give up theirs (maybe at the expense of Russia).
  15. +3
    27 October 2015 10: 10
    Quote: Reptiloid
    "You can't sit on two chairs at once" The states want to sit on many chairs at once. It's time to hurt yourself. Or will they give up something of their own if they are building a face against China? You can't keep up everywhere. As comrades commentators correctly note, the farts will explode!

    Why? 7 Let them sit until they ... tear them apart.
  16. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 14
    The Americans are also good, bursting into their waters in an abrupt way (it was the same on the Black Sea), but they are flying like crazy at all times to write a collective petition towards America to dismiss from the American fleet. They need to figure out at least for themselves, they are cool or stupid.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  17. +5
    27 October 2015 10: 15
    This is not a warning, this is a pure sub-motive. The times when the Chinese warning was ridiculously long gone, now, as Y. Kedmi says, no one laughs at the Chinese warnings.
    1. -2
      27 October 2015 11: 20
      Quote: manguest
      This is not a warning, this is a pure sub-motive. The times when the Chinese warning was ridiculously long gone, now, as Y. Kedmi says, no one laughs at the Chinese warnings.

      I beg you, nothing has changed. The Americans so far (I don’t know how to continue) spit on all Chinese warnings.
      1. +4
        27 October 2015 14: 31
        Quote: Your friend
        I beg you, nothing has changed. The Americans so far (I don’t know how to continue) spit on all Chinese warnings.

        If China spits, they will drown.
        The American hawks of war have senility and dementia. The world has changed. They spat on the interests of Russia and the world saw Crimea. They spat again and
        got such a fashion slap in the face of Syria, from which they will not soon recover.
        If now China is giving them something similar, then soon they will really become "exceptional" from the word exclude.
        And something tells you - this time China will put them in their place.
  18. +8
    27 October 2015 10: 18
    Nothing beyond the natural, so far only a pontoon game, beyond which I think no side would dare to go!
  19. +4
    27 October 2015 10: 28
    As the saying goes "Let's see" what China will actually do in this case. I think the "last Chinese warning" is history.
  20. +2
    27 October 2015 10: 37
    Duc will throw off a couple of lard greens and here Shtatnik will become sour.
  21. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 41
    Repetition of the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin? Have the Chinese patrolmen already fitted them to the islands?
  22. +2
    27 October 2015 10: 45
    The Chinese are slowly starting to fall asleep the Pacific Ocean ...
  23. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 46
    Another "exceptional" is much.

    Who cares?

    They build strov, on which there are no one; to whom does it bother?

    Only exceptional.
    1. +1
      27 October 2015 14: 08
      The island is an unsinkable aircraft carrier that does not require an order of escort ships .... unlike the iron trough .... Cheap, cool, fast (the time factor is in the first place today).
  24. +1
    27 October 2015 10: 59
    The USA with its behavior resembles an inflated peasant, who everyone starts to pound and pass the baton to the next in line! Here's a laugh! To whom China will see see!
  25. +1
    27 October 2015 11: 01
    "Exceptional" must be switched from "F" to "G".
  26. +2
    27 October 2015 11: 03
    China thought it could stay out while the States were busy with Russia, but now they are letting him know who is next.

    To say that China is doing something after Russia is hardly reasonable. The country, which is shaken by internal contradictions and the financial crisis, is preparing to fight for its own reasons. Over the past few decades, China, even with much more modest possibilities, has inexorably advanced into the southern seas, capturing ever new islands and reefs. It is significant that the islands were taken away mainly from Vietnam. So he chose this direction of expansion for a long time and the current leaders of the Celestial Empire only took the baton from senior comrades.
  27. +2
    27 October 2015 11: 44
    Quote: Your friend
    I beg you, nothing has changed. The Americans so far (I don’t know how to continue) spit on all Chinese warnings.

    So after all, the Americans spit on everyone, including their allies. Blair admitted that he convinced his opponents to join the "anti-Iraqi coalition" with the only thesis: the Americans, they say, do not listen to anyone, and so (in the coalition) it becomes possible to stay within the framework of international partnerships otnosheniya.Let's see who's nerves are stronger, it seems to me that the Chinese!
  28. 0
    27 October 2015 12: 10
    Is this the famous "last Chinese warning"? China has not won a single war.
    1. +4
      27 October 2015 12: 16
      Quote: Azovets
      Is this the famous "last Chinese warning"? China has not won a single war.

      Well, the Tang era is quite the only superpower in the world. Then they won a lot.
      1. 0
        27 October 2015 18: 13
        And in the Ming era, they made a rustle ... They repelled the first attempt at Japanese aggression (though the Korean fleet Lee Song Sina helped a lot), and so that they discouraged the Japanese for 300 years .... In the same era, the Mines were more technologically advanced , more numerous and more powerful than all the fleets of the world combined .... The tonnage of Chinese ships was ten or more times the tonnage of the later (70-80 years) Spanish caravels of Columbus ... They sailed to West Africa, some comrades suspect that to America ...
  29. +3
    27 October 2015 12: 24
    "Freedom of navigation and overflights should not be used as an excuse for muscle flexing and undermining the sovereignty and security of other countries," said embassy spokesman Zhu Haiquan.

    A worthy warning to the presumptuous Yankees.
  30. +5
    27 October 2015 12: 27
    Quote: Your friend
    Quote: Azovets
    Is this the famous "last Chinese warning"? China has not won a single war.

    Well, the Tang era is quite the only superpower in the world. Then they won a lot.


    And history has the property of repeating itself.
  31. +2
    27 October 2015 12: 28
    In Vietnam, the Tonkin incident, and in China, the Americans want to stir up the Nanshan incident. Is the USA completely without a tower?
  32. +4
    27 October 2015 12: 30
    Quote: GSH-18
    Quote: Scandinavian
    Chinese attempts to shake the air. Do not breathe and do not fart in our direction. Pretend to be strong be able to give change. Watching is embarrassing. But consumer goods overwhelmed the whole world.


    All that remains is to rattle one weapon, play with muscles and try to scare each other request


    The American reconnaissance aircraft was perfectly shot down by the Chinese with the help of an "accidental" collision with their interceptor, after which they demonstratively disassembled it, studied it and only after that returned it to the Americans. Tellingly, the third world war did not start, the recession did not occur, everyone is alive and well, except for the Chinese pilot, but he was awarded posthumously. What prevents "accidentally", because of the "confusion" and "narrowness of the South China Sea" to do the same garbage with an American destroyer? They will forever disaccustom our striped partners to stick their snouts wherever they ask.
  33. +5
    27 October 2015 15: 10
    It seems to me that the Americans themselves are not happy about this, the parade of spitting in their direction, and this is just the beginning. You just need to keep your mark. Because they offend the "ally" Japan. It is impossible not to react, other "allies" will not understand. by entering the Black Sea, to support the great Ukrainians. You will remember what the rise was in the Square. But in fact it was just zilch.
    And according to media reports, there are many applicants for this disputed territory along the way. It all depends on American plans.
    There the situation is different from the BV ... the sea. It’s harder to seep into someone else’s territory. So that the conflict can become even longer.
  34. 0
    27 October 2015 15: 31
    An hour ago, the USS Lassen destroyer passed through territorial waters, which China calls its own, near Subi Reef.

    That's all and nothing happened.
  35. +1
    27 October 2015 16: 56
    Yankees bombard the Papuans with bows and spears or a rocket for a couple of thousand kilometers to pull it yes, but it is unlikely to converge head-on. And it does not matter who the Chinese, Vietnamese or anyone else is there.
  36. 0
    28 October 2015 11: 40
    let China drown these cripples !!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"