Military Review

Media: Military operation in Syria is not burdensome for the Russian Federation

56
Moscow "can afford a military operation in Syria," despite the difficult economic situation in the country, writes the British newspaper "Financial Times", based on its own calculations and data published by IHS Jane's analytical center.




"Even if the Russian Federation will maintain the current level of air strikes during the year, it will spend less than three percent of the appropriations envisaged for national defense in 2016," - quotes the publication MIC.

"We believe that the daily expenses for such campaigns are currently reaching 2,3 - 4 million dollars," said the newspaper, Ben Moore, lead analyst for IHS Jane's.

“The daily expenses of Russia for its military contingent in Syria can be a tenth of the amount that the US spends on a similar number of its troops in Afghanistan,” writes the publication. “This is achieved, in particular, at the expense of Russia saving fuel by supporting troops by sea, as well as by concentrating military personnel at a military base, and not by deploying it over a vast territory.

For comparison, the publication cites the Pentagon’s now known expenditures on fighting the IG: for 14 months, the military department spent $ 4 billion, or about $ 10 million per day.

"Experts agree that the expenses of the Russian Federation for the operation in Syria are very small compared to its total defense expenditures," the British newspaper states.

Earlier, Dmitry Peskov said that the price of a counterterrorist operation in Syria does not go beyond the regular budget of the Ministry of Defense and will not become a burden for the budget. “No, this (operation in Syria) is not a burden for the Russian budget,” he told reporters. “In any country, especially as large as Russia, the armed forces are in a constant mobile state, there are sudden checks, exercises are being conducted, including very large-scale ones, which corresponds to the geography of Russia.” “Against this background, such an operation does not go beyond the regular budget of the Ministry of Defense,” he added.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. seregina68
    seregina68 27 October 2015 08: 32 New
    26
    Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!
    1. Penetrator
      Penetrator 27 October 2015 08: 36 New
      22
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!

      Yes, let them consider. Maybe, with such an example, even readers of the Financial Times will understand how irrationally the defense budget of the United States and its allies is spent. And draw conclusions ..
      1. Arh
        Arh 27 October 2015 08: 51 New
        +3
        They defeated the bureaucracy in the army and learned to count a pretty penny (something like that). The Syrians are hospitable, possibly supplying fuel and lubricants for our VKS for free.
        1. self-propelled
          self-propelled 27 October 2015 09: 03 New
          10
          I think in this case the issue of costs lies in a slightly different plane - it’s better now to manage relatively low costs and preserve geopolitical and strategically important territories than to spend several times more on restoring influence in this region ...
        2. nadezhiva
          nadezhiva 27 October 2015 09: 15 New
          +5
          It’s a bad habit to count in dollars the costs of a state living in the ruble zone. There are costs in foreign currency, but not 100%
        3. mark2
          mark2 27 October 2015 19: 50 New
          0
          It is highly doubtful that the fuel and lubricants for our aircraft is local. Most likely, kerosene and the rest are delivered either by sea or by air. But most likely, by the sea.
      2. volot-voin
        volot-voin 27 October 2015 08: 54 New
        25
        Quote: Penetrator
        Yes, let them consider. Maybe, with such an example, even readers of the Financial Times will understand how irrationally the defense budget of the United States and its allies is spent. And draw conclusions ..

        Americans are fighting and for some reason they find it very profitable.
        Benefit No. 1: We push extremists away from our borders, help a key ally in the region, and defend the Navy’s base in the Mediterranean.
        Benefit No. 2: With the victory of the Syrian army, our companies get the opportunity to develop and develop oil and gas fields.

        Benefit No. 3: The sale of Russian military equipment does not allow the Russian military-industrial complex to stand idle.
        Benefit No. 4: Russia looks favorably on the world stage, the main fighter against terrorism, a reliable ally, while the United States appears as sponsors of terrorism and the culprits of the troubles of the European Union.
        Benefit No. 5: Lending to the conduct of hostilities of our pilots in war conditions.
        1. SSR
          SSR 27 October 2015 09: 10 New
          12
          Quote: volot-voin
          Quote: Penetrator
          Yes, let them consider. Maybe, with such an example, even readers of the Financial Times will understand how irrationally the defense budget of the United States and its allies is spent. And draw conclusions ..

          Americans are fighting and for some reason they find it very profitable.
          Benefit No. 1: We push extremists away from our borders, help a key ally in the region, and defend the Navy’s base in the Mediterranean.
          Benefit No. 2: With the victory of the Syrian army, our companies get the opportunity to develop and develop oil and gas fields.

          Benefit No. 3: The sale of Russian military equipment does not allow the Russian military-industrial complex to stand idle.
          Benefit No. 4: Russia looks favorably on the world stage, the main fighter against terrorism, a reliable ally, while the United States appears as sponsors of terrorism and the culprits of the troubles of the European Union.
          Benefit No. 5: Lending to the conduct of hostilities of our pilots in war conditions.

          Benefit number 6 is the active drilling of all areas of the military-industrial complex, the development and implementation of new technologies, investment in the modernization of its production facilities, etc. Further, if the mistakes of the USSR are taken into account, then new technologies will begin to advance into the civilian sector. Imha.
        2. veksha50
          veksha50 27 October 2015 10: 13 New
          +9
          Quote: volot-voin
          Benefit No. 5: Lending to the conduct of hostilities of our pilots in war conditions.



          Benefits 7 and 8 - the problems of military logistics, arms stocks, the transfer of industry and the economy to military tracks are revealed, analyzed and resolved ...

          And it’s a shame for those whom no one remembers, but who provides these flights - the entire technical and service staff of our VKS ... And they not only provide reliable and efficient operation of pilot-flyers, but also learn to maintain equipment in difficult climatic conditions ...

          Look, this morning in USA Today we drove on the topic that our planes in such a climate and with such a number of daily flights ALREADY are becoming unusable ...
          1. askort154
            askort154 27 October 2015 11: 56 New
            +7
            veksha50 ..... Look, this morning in USA Today we drove on the topic that our planes in such a climate and with such a number of daily departures ALREADY allegedly become worthless.

            A condom can become unusable. And the plane, like all its units, has its own resource.
            Увеличение интенсивности полётов, естественно увеличивает нагрузку на экипаж и технический состав. В основном, износ резины и тормозных устройств, остальные агрегаты согласно ресурса. Агрегаты и планер больше "изнашиваются", если самолёт не летает годами. Конечно песок и морская соль "съедает" часть ресурса, но не настолько, чтобы - "прийти в негодность".
            Как будто американские самолёты сделаны из другого "теста". Так, что это очередной, дешёвый "фейк" против России.
        3. stas132
          stas132 27 October 2015 12: 53 New
          +3
          Benefit 6: munitions factories work in three shifts, someone also supplies products, etc. Salaries and orders are always good.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. Bochik
          Bochik 27 October 2015 13: 13 New
          0
          Quote: volot-voin


          Benefit No. 4: Russia looks favorably on the world stage, the main fighter against terrorism, a reliable ally, while the United States appears as sponsors of terrorism and the culprits of the troubles of the European Union.

          На мировой арене Россия смотрится монстром, уничтожающим умеренную оппозицию, что, в свою очередь, облегчает жизнь ИГИЛ. Вот такие коллизии западной пропаганды, которая, даже благое для всего мира дело, представляет вселенским злом, если это исходит от России, а не от Матрасии. А "матрасы" как всегда "красавцы", "спасители планеты". Пусть эффекта ноль, зато понтов...
          1. Albert1988
            Albert1988 27 October 2015 22: 17 New
            +1
            Quote: Bochik
            На мировой арене Россия смотрится монстром, уничтожающим умеренную оппозицию, что, в свою очередь, облегчает жизнь ИГИЛ. Вот такие коллизии западной пропаганды, которая, даже благое для всего мира дело, представляет вселенским злом, если это исходит от России, а не от Матрасии. А "матрасы" как всегда "красавцы", "спасители планеты". Пусть эффекта ноль, зато понтов...

            Как бы вам сказать, не надо думать, что "за бугром" прямо все так верят пропаганде - характерный пример - зайдите на ютьюб и почитайте англоязычные комменты к роликам с нашими бомбардировками игил - абсолютное большинство - положительный оценки...
      3. APASUS
        APASUS 27 October 2015 19: 38 New
        0
        Quote: Penetrator
        Maybe, with such an example, at least the readers of the Financial Times will understand how irrationally the defense budget of the United States and its allies is spent.

        You simply confuse the goals set by countries in this conflict. The USA bomb the desert for a year not to defeat their ISIS offspring, they just really give money to military-industrial corporations. You will still see how the Americans will bill their allies for this operation
    2. science fiction writer
      science fiction writer 27 October 2015 08: 37 New
      +3
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!

      Yes, let them consider, if you look, ordinary citizens will begin to revel in their rulers and military commanders, where they bury the money. am
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 27 October 2015 08: 59 New
        +1
        Soviet folk song:
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. ZU-23
      ZU-23 27 October 2015 08: 39 New
      15
      It’s correctly noticed that we spend more money on large-scale exercises, and only a few planes fly in Syria.
      1. hydrox
        hydrox 27 October 2015 08: 54 New
        +5
        Quote: ZU-23
        and in Syria, only a few planes fly.


        This really small and inexpensive action in terms of training the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation matters more than all the exercises throughout the year, taken together both in terms of developing tactics and in the general military strategic sense.
        The Yankees (and not only them) must understand that in the military-political sense, Putin stands behind FORCE, and not just a saber-rattling weapon, no matter how much of it is shown to Russia.
        1. BABAY22
          BABAY22 27 October 2015 09: 43 New
          +1
          Quote: hydrox
          ... matters more than all teachings throughout the year combined ...

          Well, you bent of course.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. SSR
      SSR 27 October 2015 08: 53 New
      +3
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!

      Budget Warfare is the same method of warfare.
    7. Tor5
      Tor5 27 October 2015 08: 54 New
      +5
      Разумный вывод! Постоянные масштабные учения обходятся куда дороже, да и "обкатка" кадров в военных действиях более конструктивна.
    8. EvgNik
      EvgNik 27 October 2015 08: 55 New
      +7
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!

      It’s just a pity! With the complete failure of their bombing. It's a shame, you know.
    9. Vend
      Vend 27 October 2015 09: 48 New
      0
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!

      And Britain with a favorable economic situation cannot afford such military operations. laughing
      1. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 28 October 2015 01: 57 New
        0
        This is not a capture of the colonies! Here are expenses that are still unknown whether they will bring at least some profit, other than self-esteem and expressed gratitude!
    10. marlin1203
      marlin1203 27 October 2015 10: 09 New
      +2
      The most important thing is the invaluable combat experience for pilots. The more it passes through Syria, the stronger our aviation will generally become. You can’t buy such a thing for any dollars. soldier
    11. meriem1
      meriem1 27 October 2015 10: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: seregina68
      Нашим "западным партнёрам": не считайте чужие деньги!


      Yes! Let them envy aside. Silently !!!!

      ... and learn how to fight ...
    12. GSH-18
      GSH-18 27 October 2015 11: 53 New
      0
      Media: Military operation in Syria is not burdensome for the Russian Federation

      God forbid, soon to drive out bearded cockroaches from Syria. And so that peace has already come!
  2. HAM
    HAM 27 October 2015 08: 33 New
    28
    The combat experience gained in Syria cannot be bought.
  3. Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 27 October 2015 08: 34 New
    10
    Experts agree that the costs of the Russian Federation for the operation in Syria are very small compared to c ..
    .. compared to the benefits that Russia will receive upon successful completion of the Campaign ..! crying
  4. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 27 October 2015 08: 34 New
    0
    Judging by the photo, our VKS in Syria have already applied identification marks on airplanes. Or is this Su-24 not in Syria?
    1. BABAY22
      BABAY22 27 October 2015 09: 49 New
      +1
      Well no. It just peeled off the paint.
      You can’t cover the stars.
  5. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 27 October 2015 08: 35 New
    +3
    Previously, news on the Internet was ahead of TV news, but now they are a day or two late.
  6. hydrox
    hydrox 27 October 2015 08: 36 New
    +2
    This foreign political action is interesting primarily because it allows you to fully assess the mobilization suitability of the Russian economy for a timely response not only to military threats.
    Today it’s a touchstone on which certain elements of building a mobilization economy that can function in the conditions of the deepening global crisis, which for Russia is not only financial, but also systemic and managerial, can be honed - it is obvious that today's Pr-in is completely incapable of leading the economy of a big country ...
  7. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +5
    Как говорил один персонаж : "Дёшево и сердито !"
  8. Tusv
    Tusv 27 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +4
    Are right. The British. A month of IS bombing is equal to one surprise check. And dividends ... Pilots study, military consultants learn to learn. The world is in shock.
    And Vovochka is more insidious than the West thinks. He intends to return the brains that flowed to the West for a better life. If at least 10% returns this sentence
  9. samara-58
    samara-58 27 October 2015 08: 41 New
    +5
    We have many governors, you can fight for a long time !!! lol
  10. 740
    740 27 October 2015 08: 43 New
    +2
    Sooner or later, the Saracens will crawl out of the tunnel to the shirts. Then, let FT consider how much the cost of placing new citizens will cost their country. yes
  11. Gor-1974
    Gor-1974 27 October 2015 08: 45 New
    -5
    In any case, these expenses are borne by the people, with the advent of new taxes, frozen pensions, property tax, land tax, income tax, paid renewal at school, cop tax. building repairs, higher prices for food, gasoline, utility bills, travel by public transport, soon a paid school and medicine. There are no illusions on whose money air strikes go. I think there is no naive who will think that those in power will invest in this matter. Therefore, they don’t care how much to bomb, at least a year, at least two. It’s good that everyone here is honest and will not steal under the guise, otherwise it will drag on for a century. (A hundred-year war was in history). Of course, if the people had the right to vote not on the forum but in life, he would say, you fight there, (not the military but at the top) but do not conquer too much, everything should be a measure and a strict report
    1. BABAY22
      BABAY22 27 October 2015 09: 57 New
      +5
      Do you have something against?
      Have you listed everything? About kOp. repair of buildings did not forget? Oh, they didn’t write about the salaries of doctors and teachers.
      Now listen here.
      If you do not like that Russia is rising from its knees, then say so. And not this clumsy handle of the seeds of discord over the corner.
      1. Das Boot
        Das Boot 27 October 2015 10: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: Gor-1974
        the people take over, with the advent of new taxes, frozen pensions, tax on

        Quote: BABAY22
        Do you have something against?
        Have you listed everything? About kOp. repair of buildings did not forget? Oh, they didn’t write about the salaries of doctors and teachers.
        Now listen here.

        do not quarrel, valets) Curious, but comrade Gor-1974 vollen nevolen cited an article from the same Financial Times under the heading Russia defies recession to fund Syria conflict. There about the sequester, and about pensions, and about tightening belts, and other unpopular measures)
      2. am808s
        am808s 27 October 2015 15: 13 New
        0
        Are you talking about seeds? Say yes do not speak. Hurray to shout at someone else’s expense is not overtaken and we do not need a company with a length of a year. On my own, I’ll say for 9000 I’ll live, but no more than a year. The Army and Navy certainly unite us, but also undress us, do not forget about this.
    2. pts-m
      pts-m 27 October 2015 15: 12 New
      +1
      there is a saying among the people of Russia ... they don’t cry after losing their heads ... as they say ... who is talking about that, and lousy everything about the bathhouse ... not understanding that the bathhouse can burn out. or after a fight they don’t wave their fists. whining.
  12. Manager
    Manager 27 October 2015 08: 48 New
    +1
    But I remember Romanov writing to me that in no case should aviation assistance be given to Syria, that there would be losses, etc. I still remember telling him that there would be no loss)
  13. 31rus
    31rus 27 October 2015 08: 48 New
    +1
    Уважаемые,следует отметить смену риторики,экономика России уже не "порвана в клочья",армия вполне боеспособна,политика России ясна ,обеспеченно взаимодействие с союзниками,все это не видимая работа и дает такой результат в Сирии
  14. gloomy fox
    gloomy fox 27 October 2015 08: 50 New
    0
    counting money in someone else’s pocket is NOT Good, but Interesting. Count your money first. Well, you think America spent 4 billion dollars for 2 years, 10 mil a day, well, so there will be little print for yourself. Yes, the troops are learning in a real combat environment. here you gentlemen s no sudden checks do not occur, why do not you always somewhere something bmbite oh sorry Fight!
  15. Wolka
    Wolka 27 October 2015 08: 51 New
    0
    however bravo to our military logisticians ...
  16. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 27 October 2015 09: 01 New
    +5
    Quote: HAM
    The combat experience gained in Syria cannot be bought.


    Смотрел тут недавно балаболку по ТВ (название не помню) с А.Пушковым , так он там хорошо ответил на вопрос какого-то чела : "Если потребуется заплатить жизнями воинов за национальную безопасность России - страна заплатит." Ч.ёрт , жёстко , но это так . Тем более , сопляков необстрелянных в бой никто не пустит больше . И это хорошо , при Шойгу дурдом из армии исчезает . "старпёрный арбатский военный округ" дружно дембельнулся при нём , пришли крепыши-полковники , кот. оч. хотят стать генералами , некоторые уже . Так это правильно ! Эффективность ВКС в Сирии - лучший тому пример . Е , душа радуется , как пацанов-срочников на улице вижу . В глазах - достоинство , а не голод , как было ещё совсем недавно .
  17. Россия 24
    Россия 24 27 October 2015 09: 06 New
    +3
    Our aircraft are cheaper to maintain and bombs are 10 times cheaper, and salaries are not as huge as those of Americans. So the military company is more economical than the amers. Moreover, they do our deeds, and they are in words and on paper.
  18. Siberian
    Siberian 27 October 2015 09: 07 New
    +1
    оБЕСПОКОЕННОСТЬ ЭКОНОМИКОЙ НАШЕЙ СТРАНЫ СО СТОРОНЫ ПАРТНЕРОВ И СОЗНИКОВ ТАК ТРОГАТЕЛЬНО И СЕНТИМЕНТАЛЬНО. мОГУТ НЕ ПЕРЕЖИВАТЬ. мЫ, ЕСЛИ "БЮДЖЕТУ" НЕ ХВАТИТ, СКИНЕМСЯ И ДОБАВИМ.
  19. tommy717
    tommy717 27 October 2015 09: 09 New
    0
    Quote: Samara-58
    We have many governors, you can fight for a long time !!! lol

    Нужно для начала конфискацию нажитого "непосильным" трудом имущества ввести. А так я согласен. Пускай некоторые бывшие губернаторы (например Сахалина)и другие коррупционеры вносят вклад в укрепление ВС РФ.
  20. Million
    Million 27 October 2015 09: 22 New
    +2
    It was more correct to say: Russia's benefit from Syria’s operations is much greater than its costs
  21. maksim
    maksim 27 October 2015 09: 24 New
    +3
    it’s not a question of money, but of our strength, we will always earn money
  22. Bourgeois
    Bourgeois 27 October 2015 09: 29 New
    +3
    They didn’t just count.
    They are comparing. Compare the cost of the operation and its effectiveness at the exit. And it seems the comparison is not their benefit. Our operation is four times cheaper, with greater efficiency by an order of magnitude.
    Их это огорчает)))Но пичалька ихняя, не поможет им сократить расходы на своих военов.Наши солдаты привычны к необходимому минимуму, а их минимум по любому будет больше.Избаловались "союзнички", они уже не понимают, что война это лишения, для всех, что на войне следует воевать,а не юзать гаджеты.
    1. Lena Alena
      Lena Alena 27 October 2015 20: 37 New
      +1
      And our pampres are not spent ..
  23. Mishut37rf
    Mishut37rf 27 October 2015 10: 01 New
    +2
    Shoigu must additionally take the post of Minister of Finance. He has done more than the rest of the ministers to strengthen the ruble in recent times! laughing laughing laughing
  24. veksha50
    veksha50 27 October 2015 10: 06 New
    +2
    Mdaaa ...

    The United States spends about 10 million dollars a day on fighting ISIS, Russia - from 2,3 to 4,0 million dollars a day ...

    Каков пассаж... А какова "эхвективность" амерсов !!!

    P.S. Ограниченная операция российских ВКС, ограниченными силами, плюс "плевок" на дальнюю дистанцию каспийскими "малышами" свели авторитет самовлюбленного "гегемона" на уровень плинтуса... Это - не шапкозакидательство, а констатация факта... За короткий срок добиться такой эффективности, которая амерсам и не снилась в их ближневосточных операциях...
  25. akudr48
    akudr48 27 October 2015 10: 06 New
    0
    Earlier, Dmitry Peskov said that the price of the counter-terrorist operation in Syria does not go beyond the regular budget of the Ministry of Defense and will not become a burden on the budget

    Whatever this friend of Veni Diktov and the lover of watches for 36 million, when he lied about them, said, everything should be considered the same information product as about watches.
  26. Vladimir
    Vladimir 27 October 2015 10: 09 New
    +1
    Quote: Million
    It was more correct to say: Russia's benefit from Syria’s operations is much greater than its costs


    In other words: the end justifies the means. But if Syria is an ally, then support must be given unequivocally, even if Russia does not have any benefit, it can come in handy in the future. One Eastern wisdom says: stones of the past are steps of the future.
    1. Das Boot
      Das Boot 27 October 2015 10: 24 New
      0
      Quote: Vladimir 
      if Syria is an ally, then support must be given unequivocally, even if Russia will not have any benefit, it may come in handy in the future.

      misty set out. If there are any prospects, then, therefore, the benefit is obvious, not?
  27. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 27 October 2015 10: 35 New
    0
    Россия поднялась во весь рост!!Я присоединюсь к ниже следующей цитате.Она обращена к тем,кто любит ныть и жаловаться,кто слушает это нытье по "Эху"
    !
    Quote: BABAY22
    Do you have something against?
    Have you listed everything? About kOp. repair of buildings did not forget? Oh, they didn’t write about the salaries of doctors and teachers.
    Now listen here.
    If you do not like that Russia is rising from its knees, then say so. And not this clumsy handle of the seeds of discord over the corner.
  28. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 27 October 2015 10: 40 New
    +1
    Earlier, Dmitry Peskov said that the price of the counter-terrorist operation in Syria does not go beyond the regular budget of the Ministry of Defense and will not become a burden on the budget.

    Это человек который постоянно и систематически врёт, почитайте интернет. Его ответы на вопросы и что произошло потом на самом деле. Относительно "пусть олигархи скинутся на войну", я конечно - за, но все мы понимаем, что эти не скинутся, скорее ещё украдут и будет как в анекдоте:
    "Папа, водка подорожала, ты теперь будешь меньше пить?"
    "Нет, сынок, ты будешь меньше кушать."
  29. sieras
    sieras 27 October 2015 10: 43 New
    0
    they will take away debt from Ukraine 3 billion and the operation will pay off with full.
  30. Vladimir
    Vladimir 27 October 2015 10: 55 New
    +2
    Quote: Das Boot
    misty set out. If there are any prospects, then, therefore, the benefit is obvious, not?


    1. Russia will maintain a presence in this region and most likely on an ongoing basis for any
    alignment of forces within the country.

    2. Based on the foregoing, Russia will become a deterrent in the center of the Islamic hearth, and this is very important. This may include the lifting of sanctions by the West, the influence in some way on the price of oil, and finally, if not the first and not the last violin in geopolitics.
  31. sw247
    sw247 27 October 2015 14: 07 New
    +4
    This is not an expense, this is an investment.