The death of capitalism: ahead is the “new slave system”

The death of capitalism: ahead is the “new slave system”



I have already written many times that world capitalism has entered a new and final phase of its development. Almost 100 years ago (in 1916), V. Lenin (Ulyanov) wrote the book Imperialism as the Highest Stage of Capitalism. In it, he stated that at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries capitalism became monopolistic, and that such capitalism was the last stage in the development of this socio-economic formation. The classic hurried somewhat with the imposition of the death penalty on capitalism.

Humanity had to wait another century until, finally, we personally witnessed the death convulsions of capitalism. Outwardly, everything looks prosaic. The world of capital has entered a phase of zero and negative interest rates. And these are not some “temporary difficulties”, but a sustainable new quality of the economy. Capitalism is a model in which the highest, ultimate goal of economic activity is profit. In the form of industrial or commercial income, loan interest. Profit provides capital gains, it becomes, as the classic Marxism said, “self-increasing value”. So the "self-growth" of capital is over. It began to "decrease".

The core of the capitalist model is banks with their lending rates. In the banking sector, you can trace the unique metamorphosis of interest. A modern bank is a depository institution. It attracts money on deposits at a certain percentage and gives loans at interest. After the financial crisis, 2007 − 2009. in the world began to be observed a mass phenomenon to reduce deposit interest. The trend has gone so far that in some countries and in some banks deposit interest (not only real, but also nominal) has gone into the negative zone.

First of all, the central banks began to establish negative interest rates on deposits. The first to do this was the Central Bank of Sweden. He was followed by several European Central Bank. Last June, the European Central Bank (ECB) lowered the deposit rate from 0 to minus 0,10. Such actions of central banks were explained by the fact that the monetary authorities tried to overcome the economic stagnation, force commercial banks to lend to the economy, and not sit out in the “quiet deposit haven”.

After some time, the epidemic of negative interest rates on deposits began to seize private commercial banks. At first it was the banks of Switzerland. In fairness it should be recognized that in the past some of them took money from customers for placing money on deposits. It was a fee for the “service” of confidentiality. A very popular "service", given that money flowed into Switzerland with a very dubious origin. Today, bank secrecy in Switzerland is almost completely eliminated. Therefore, today negative deposit rates do not represent a fee for a delicate “service” of a bank to a client. They are dictated by the economic conditions of the banking business.

It should be emphasized that the Swiss monetary authorities encourage a similar interest rate policy of their banks, since it holds back the flow of free capital into this country from all over Europe. Financial and economic instability in the European Union increases the investment attractiveness of Switzerland (even despite the fact that bank secrecy has been eliminated). But a powerful influx of money into Switzerland sharply increases the Swiss franc, and this creates big problems for the country's economy. In Switzerland, there is a paradoxical situation when banks are protected from the influx of customers with the help of negative interest on deposits.

Yes, this is the Swiss specificity. But in neighboring Germany, a number of banks also announced negative deposit interest rates. How can this be explained? - Negative interest on deposits is a necessary measure, since banks have sharply sunk their income from active operations. Especially on credit. So far, loans have not reached negative interest rates, but positive values ​​in some cases have decreased to 2 − 3%. Money has become almost free. And in some countries, where there is at least a small inflation, real interest rates (nominal rates, adjusted for changes in the purchasing power of money) went into the negative zone.

In this difficult situation, it is unprofitable for banks to engage in their traditional deposit-credit industry. They go to financial markets, shifting the center of gravity of their active operations from loans to investments. But under the "investment" actually lurking banal speculation with all sorts of financial instruments. However, in the financial markets for the speculators come the hard times. In Europe, over the past two or three years, a large number of government debt securities with negative interest have appeared. Speculators, of course, try to play with such "cards", but this game is extremely unusual and does not bring fabulous profits. And losses happen more often.

However, the phenomenon of zero and negative interest rates is still mainly observed in the countries of the “golden billion”. There, the reduction of interest rates on deposits, loans and financial instruments is greatly facilitated by the monetary authorities, who pursue a policy of “quantitative easing”. Simply put, central banks turned on the “printing presses”, continuously throwing huge amounts of money into the economy. There is an "overproduction" of money. And with the "overproduction" of any product, the price for it falls. Money in this sense is no exception.

But on the periphery of world capitalism, central banks are strictly forbidden to engage in "quantitative easing." They were ordered to engage in the exact opposite - “quantitative tightening”. Simply put, the contraction of the money supply. Therefore, on the periphery of world capitalism, interest rates remain (so far) at a high level. For the world of usurers, Wall Street, the City of London, and other banking centers of the country, the periphery of world capitalism is a lifeline. Here they continue to feel like classic money capitalists. However, sooner or later, an epidemic of negative interest will reach the periphery of world capitalism. There are signs that already got.

In 2015, capital began to withdraw from the periphery of world capitalism to the countries of the “golden billion”. First of all in the USA. According to the Institute of International Finance, in the third quarter of 2015, investors sold assets in developing countries for 40 billion dollars and brought them to the “golden billion” zone. This is the worst quarterly indicator of capital outflows from 2008. The sharks of the capitalist business have gnawed fairly third-world countries and are returning to their safe havens. The latest surveys of peripheral companies of world capitalism, as reported by the latest issue of The Economist magazine, show that more than 20% of companies have interest payments higher than their income before taxes.

According to other sources, in many third world countries, the net profits (ie, after-tax profits) of the corporate sector are comparable to the costs of servicing foreign debts. Corporate debt in developing countries has grown fivefold over the past decade and today amounts to $ 18 trillion dollars, or more than 70% of GDP, notes The Economist in the UK. How to explain this phenomenon of net capital outflow from the countries of the periphery of world capitalism? - Apparently, the base in the form of corporate profits to maintain high interest rates in this area is rapidly eroding.

Partly, the phenomenon of the movement of capital into the “golden billion” zone, into quiet harbors with zero or even negative interest rates can be explained by the fact that the era of so-called passionary capitalists has already passed. We are dealing with very strange capitalists who choose security and sacrifice profits. At one time the classics of Marxism, wrote: "Provide 10 percent, and capital to agree to any application, at 20 percent he becomes animated, at 50 percent positive is ready to break his neck at 100 percent, he tramples on all human laws, at 300 percent there is no crime which he would not risk, even under the gallows fear. ” These words do not belong to Marx, but to Thomas Joseph Dannin, the classic only quoted him. But in any case, the spirit of capitalism, these words conveyed very accurately.

Today's capitalism is different. Earlier this year, Jacob Rothschild, president and principal shareholder of the investment fund RIT Capital Partners, has published an annual report on the Foundation's activities in 2014 In it, he admitted that in the coming years, not capital gains will be the main goal of the business, and its preservation. The meaning of his statement is as follows: they say, it is necessary to go through hard times, and then we will return again to our usual and beloved business (capital increase).

I am afraid to disappoint Rothschild: there will be no return to the past. And I recommend to reread "Capital", in which the classic formulates a law - the tendency of the rate of profit to decrease. All the century and a half, the rate of return really went down, today it is already at the level of "plinth". Aggregate capital will not increase, since real GDP growth has already ended. Begin a brutal time of "black redistribution" of capital balances. The majority of capitalists, deprived of their former “passionarity”, will seek refuge anywhere. Even in financial instruments with a negative percentage.

In mid-September, a meeting of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve was held. Everyone was tensely waiting for this meeting, because the crucial question had to be decided: should the Fed raise or not raise the interest rate? In other words: to return to the times of classical capitalism with a lending rate or extend the “interest vacation”? The Federal Reserve decided to extend the “interest vacation”. Fed officials had to choose between "bad" and "very bad." Judging by the decision, they considered “bad” the preservation of the interest rate close to zero. A "very bad" - its increase. For the money will cease to be free, and this may introduce the American economy into a "tailspin" with unpredictable economic, social and political consequences.

The countries of the periphery of world capitalism also breathed a sigh of relief. For even the establishment of accounting rates by the Fed 1-2% level it would be a disaster for them: to the mass flight of capital to the "land of promise", ie, in the financial and banking system of the USA... We know the saying: “Nothing is more permanent than something temporary.” The “quantitative easing” programs in the USA (and later in other Western countries) were launched as “temporary”. However, the West will not be able to abandon them. Recently, the Treasury Department announced that the interest rate on US Treasury securities was set at zero. This is a landmark event, indicating that there will be no return to the previous capitalism.
The classics of Marxism-Leninism said that in the process of capitalist accumulation, the rate of profit (and loan interest as the main form of profit) would inexorably decrease. And this will inevitably lead to the "death" of capitalism. We can agree with that. True, at the same time, we add that the classics did not have enough imagination to imagine that the loan interest could fall below zero. Negative interest rates tell us: capitalism has become a corpse. But at the same time for some reason no one has the courage to fix the fact of death.

Speaking of the antagonistic contradictions of capitalism, the classics made an “iron” conclusion that socialism would replace capitalism. But with this you can not fully agree. There is no “iron” determinism in stories There can be no. The “owners of money” realize that the capitalist model of the economy and society that has existed for several centuries has become obsolete. And "routinely" prepare humanity for the transition to a different model, where they could be masters, but no money, and the whole world as a set of natural resources, the material productive forces and all people on the planet.

Moreover, power over people should be extended to their consciousness. Without an understanding of tectonic processes in global capitalism is difficult to understand many of the current events in the world: the emergence of LIH, war in the Middle East, "migration of peoples" in Europe, the "democratic revolution" in Ukraine, etc. All of these are elements of a gigantic project to transform doomed capitalism into another socio-economic formation, which can be called the “new slave-owning system”. You can resist new slavery only if you understand what the plans of the current "owners of money" are.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Humpty 28 October 2015 05: 39 New
    • 19
    • 0
    +19
    Not when slavery did not disappear completely. Slavery necessarily arises where it is economically viable.
    1. Tatyana 28 October 2015 06: 39 New
      • 19
      • 0
      +19
      There is Milton Friedman's book Capitalism and Freedom, released for the first time in English in 1962. It is stated in it ideology of organization in the world of so-called "Clean market" of capital, goods and labor and monetarism. This ideology is, in fact, the ideology of the transition from CAPITALISM to the OWNERSHIP system.
      It is a pity that this book was translated into Russian too late.
      What this new system will look like is partially possible to learn from the speech of Igor Berkut, the people's choice from the Great Ukraine party. The truth is soberingly shocking.
      Listen carefully from the 2 minute.
      1. Arkan 28 October 2015 07: 38 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        The talking head told everything correctly, and the Ukrainians jumped and jumped for this bright future.
        1. Xanna 28 October 2015 09: 56 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          And the most important thing is pride!
          After all, many already understand that they are jumping into the abyss, that everything around is changing for the worse, that even under Yanukovych it was better, BUT
          To say a simple "Was wrong,!" pride does not allow!
          Well, now that you have to be a brow to Moscow, ask for forgiveness and try to get out of your swamp.
          Here it’s in a single head, that on a country-wide scale, everything is the same, I'd rather die than admit that I was not right and go to ask for forgiveness.
        2. WKS
          WKS 28 October 2015 10: 13 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Arkan
          The classics of Marxism-Leninism said that in the process of capitalist accumulation, the rate of profit (and loan interest as the main form of profit) will inevitably decrease. And this will inevitably lead to the "death" of capitalism.

          The classics of Marxism still foreshadowed in addition to the collapse of capitalism, the death of the family, private property and the state. And we are now observing all these processes.
        3. Volzhanin 29 October 2015 10: 26 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          You might think that this is not so.
          Ha-ha!
          The same bunch of thieves, as in the ruin, only larger.
      2. Stelth1985 28 October 2015 08: 01 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        This person describes the situation in the world, and not just in Ukraine. So look at who we are dealing with. Everything about whom he says this is a bitch! And how to solve a question with them ???
        1. larand 28 October 2015 09: 48 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Stelth1985
          This person describes the situation in the world, and not just in Ukraine. So look at who we are dealing with. Everything about whom he says this is a bitch! And how to solve a question with them ???


          Late, dear. It was possible to live differently, but man is a strange animal, they drove themselves back.
      3. varov14 28 October 2015 09: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The mouth of the “moron” says the truth, though he was embarrassed to bring the idea to the end that time will pass and this same Pole, if an evil owner comes across, will sing for free, for a stew, after it is pulled and banned.
      4. Max_Bauder 28 October 2015 12: 37 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Dude is telling the truth, this is happening all over the post-Soviet space, let alone the whole world, starting with Latin America and Southeast Asia, ending with Europe and the United States. The population is servants, serving staff of the rich, for us there is bread (GMO products or full of chemicals) and spectacles (movies, music, sports).
        This is capitalism, his mother. In all the fucking beauty. Read another book by Muammar Gaddafi's "Green Book". There, he also explains in detail the whole criminal essence of modern society. I won’t tell you how the Libyans lived with him, or rather what social payments he made, read or take a look at him in nete, in short for us a "fairy tale", better than the "American dream", and better than the "Soviet dream". Until such a person, but stronger, comes to power, our tomatoes cried.

        PySy. Last year I read the news, in London, two English damsels froze in the winter because they saved on heating, their communal apartment almost a thousand pounds a month.
      5. holding 28 October 2015 14: 27 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        In Russia, everything goes the same.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. BMW
        BMW 28 October 2015 08: 20 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Tatiana
        What this new system will look like, you can partly learn from the speech of the people's deputy of the Great Ukraine party Igor Berkut

        This entry has been found.
        What is new in it? This we heard from Chubais and Gaidar, yet FIG knows when. The question is different, why is all this still being implemented?
        1. Gardamir 28 October 2015 09: 08 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          The question is different, why is all this still being implemented?
          Because there are fans of these theories, some of them hold presidency.
          1. BMW
            BMW 28 October 2015 09: 52 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Gardamir
            some of them hold presidency.

            Well, why are you so "patriots" right away, but in your ear. lol
          2. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 29 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Because there are fans of these theories, some of them hold presidency.


            You are not quite right. Fans are fans, but they, well, they can’t carry out “these theories” in their pure form. Because they are under pressure from the West, which they adore and would like to cling to. But ... does not grow together. As "masters" they are not needed there, but as "slaves" they themselves do not want. And in order not to be dispossessed by force, they need the protection that only a strong state can provide, at the heart of which, of course, is the people. Therefore, our state, although it is social. Sociality is frail, crooked, but it is and it will continue to be maintained. The same applies to moral aspects, family, normal orientation, the elite needs cannon fodder and working hands, but how many will the “electorate” of office hamsters with white collars and “rainbow” inclinations give? The question is rhetorical - from a same-sex couple of children it will not work. Hence the support of the family and the prohibition of pederast parades.
            However, all this we already went through, the wolves of capitalism in the sheep's clothing of the "patriarchal monarchy." What ended, at least we, who studied under the Union and did not become a victim of the USE - remember. So theoretically, we can still steer towards socialism. But only through severe hardships, as then.
        2. varov14 28 October 2015 09: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          How why, how many “Fields” among us, who freely enjoy life in Russia, it turns out everyone who works for capital, even if it’s not really fun.
      2. varov14 28 October 2015 09: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Therefore, multiply the number of Jews by 2800 and calculate the future population of the earth.
        1. Azitral 28 October 2015 18: 31 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Poor thing ... Well, how many times smarter than you have to consider Jews? Really in 2800?
          Each nation has its own specific kind of stupidity, which prevents us from taking over the world. The Jews have the same: the most advanced of them, of all the goyim, are considered not to be idiots, but generally unconscious. On this, periodically, they burn terribly. By the way, - the Israelis, in my opinion, are not Jews in this aspect either. As one "returnee" 22 years old said in the blue eye: "Israel is not a place for a decent Jew."
    4. Ross_ulair 28 October 2015 09: 39 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Humpty
      Not when slavery did not disappear completely. Slavery necessarily arises where it is economically viable.


      And now we are slaves. Slaves who voluntarily and joyfully run to work to earn a ration of bread and the maintenance of mortgages, credit cars and more. And for a larger RFP is already not enough.

      Financial slavery is ingenious in its essence - neither protection is required, nor maintenance is required. Slaves themselves come and work out their time.
      1. qQQQ 28 October 2015 14: 33 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: ROSS_Ulair
        And now we are slaves.

        I support, I always prove that in the USSR we were more free than now.
        1. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 38 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          I support, I always prove that in the USSR we were more free than now.


          But to argue with this is pointless. Now for freedom you have to pay lower wages, the danger of losing your job altogether, and, accordingly, the unknown of the future.
        2. Azitral 28 October 2015 18: 34 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Your sincere unconsciousness or conscious cunning is not very harmless. Nostalgia should not interfere with a clear look.
        3. Aljavad 29 October 2015 02: 29 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And now we are slaves.
          I support, I always prove that in the USSR we were more free than now.


          It was said very wisely in the USSR that it is impossible to live in society and be free from this society, from its laws and traditions. Therefore, there are no free ones. This is an illusion and a hoax. The richest oligarch is the Slave of his "factories, newspapers, ships". His lovers, cooks and guards. Your lifestyle, your circle.

          Free - homeless! Or a yogi, an ascetic, who has sent far away the whole society with its traditions. All the rest are slaves.

          But the article is not about that! Not about Ukraine, not about Russia, not about the CIS and not even about England, where two old women froze themselves.

          Read it again! Perhaps you will understand. Or not! Do not read.
      2. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 35 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        And now we are slaves. Slaves who voluntarily and joyfully run to work to earn a ration of bread and the maintenance of mortgages, credit cars and more. And for a larger RFP is already not enough.


        Not quite yet. For the time being, I can send a commerce, which at an interview when applying for a job begins to insult me ​​and boast of its coolness and wealth. I can even crack my fist on the table of a chief in a state institution, and it doesn’t always always end with dismissal. But the slave cannot do anything. What do you think, would I now gain this post after such actions, if I were a slave?
    5. kabnb 28 October 2015 10: 59 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      just capitalism took an example from socialism and became more acceptable and did not die. then socialism began to take an example from capitalism and immediately died. and then capitalism was left without an example, and he had no choice but to die or revive socialism. then he decided to come up with a new universal equivalent
      1. varov14 28 October 2015 13: 10 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        He already thought of it, you overslept. One pridurok sewed a chip into his hand (too lazy to pull the magnetic card out of his pocket already), the other pridurok would figure out how to act on this chip so that it would transmit a signal to the centers of pleasure of the brain, everything, work for the balance and have fun.
    6. Max_Bauder 28 October 2015 11: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Some kind of messy article, with dubious conclusions regarding the transition of capitalism to something else. But I agree that there will be no socialism with this
      And in a "planned manner" they are preparing humanity for a transition to another model, where they could remain masters, but not of money, but of the whole world as a combination of natural resources, material productive forces and all people on the planet.

      here it is necessary to make a reservation that it is not humanity but a narrow circle of people of Zionists, Rothschilds and other masses who have already divided the Planet with all the populations, countries and their presidents into zones of influence, like the king of their vassals, serfs and slaves.

      All these are elements of a gigantic project to transform doomed capitalism into another socio-economic formation, which can be arbitrarily called the "new slave system."

      that’s rightly said, this is what’s going on, but the author didn’t add that all this will be accompanied by universal chipping from infancy (slaves were used to denote slaves in ancient Rome and Egypt) and a reduction in the population of slaves, through “random” technological disasters, diseases of epidemics and wars , both local and nuclear in the radical case, there are analytical articles that scatter the inconsistency of the theory that nuclear wars will lead to the destruction of all mankind. No! They won’t bring! there will be a reduction, but many will survive, half or a third for sure, this is enough for the Zionist masses to re-grow their "cattle".
      Opposing new slavery is possible only if you understand what the plans of the current "owners of money" are.

      Not understanding will lead to the fight against this, but real actions, perhaps the "system" (God) will lead its "Neo", a revolutionary who will lower the power of such, and then humanity will finally be free from the yoke of the capitalists described above, and will look at the future to another.
    7. ava09 28 October 2015 11: 46 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Humpty
      Not when slavery did not disappear completely. Slavery necessarily arises where it is economically viable.


      Not exactly. Slavery has existed and always exists, it just takes different economic forms.
      1. Humpty 28 October 2015 14: 18 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: ava09
        Not exactly. Slavery has existed and always exists, it just takes different economic forms.

        Close to accuracy. I didn’t mean enslavement by loans, low salaries, etc., but real slavery — forced, unpaid work for a bowl of soup with corporal or other punishments in case of disobedience, human trafficking. Unfortunately, this is common on the territory of our former common country.
        1. Aljavad 29 October 2015 02: 37 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Unfortunately, this is common on the territory of our former common country.


          It is widely practiced all over the world. No need to kick the Fatherland in vain. Human trafficking - the slave trade is the most profitable criminal business, along with drugs and weapons.
          And prostitutes, and donors and just free workers without rights.
    8. My doctor 28 October 2015 12: 40 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Slavery can be understood in two ways, and indeed the one who wrote the article in a certain sense is the slave himself, but by a different criterion. The first reason slavery can be seen in the inequality of people and the presence of "excessive" benefits in the use of which they are infringed. For example, a modern slave works from sunrise to sunset, not only to satisfy his necessities of life, but also to reach the bar set by his master, for example, to buy an iPhone. The second reason it already refers to the author himself follows from the phrase "you want to be free, be it." (and for those who like to think, a bunch of words, freedom and equality is a dilemma)
      Capitalism has flaws, but this does not mean that the "Capital" of K. Marx is impeccable. K. Marx is not a prophet; he used the works of his contemporaries in his work, and made conclusions on their basis. I am sure if at that time he also had at his disposal the practical knowledge that we now would have lived in another world.
      The mass of futurological forecasts of that century has not come true. And knowledge is on a completely different level than it was at that time. The value of K. Marx’s work at the present stage is not in theory but in the idea itself. Ideas for the development of society.
      1. Basarev 28 October 2015 15: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And in the most capitalistly developed countries there are sprouts of communism. I read about kibbutzim. These are such autonomous collective farms in Israel. They work on imported raw materials. So, there is an opinion that if you make a kibbutz completely self-sufficient, then this will be real and genuine communism.
  2. EvgNik 28 October 2015 05: 41 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    And our financiers are investing everything and are investing in the economy of the West, thereby keeping it afloat.
    1. varov14 28 October 2015 09: 51 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      And how do our financiers differ from Western ones, no one has removed the class question from the agenda.
  3. Name 28 October 2015 05: 44 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Greetings to all! Well Cho, - "Workers of all countries, unite!" Down with the Golden Million.
    1. Aljavad 28 October 2015 06: 46 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Workers of all countries, unite


      That's just the "proletarians" are gone. Everyone has something to lose.
      1. BMW
        BMW 28 October 2015 07: 42 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: Aljavad
        That's just the "proletarians" are gone. Everyone has something to lose.

        Let me ask, what should I lose? 61 sq. meters in Brezhnevka, which after 5 years must be demolished, because concrete can be broken with a hammer (and this is in the 10-point seismic zone), 12 summer cottages of what can not be called land, with a cost price grown like in an expensive store and at the same time break your head and knock down your hands, a car that's 20 years old for lunch? What do you call there is something to lose? belay And this despite the fact that all this rubbish costs millions. Who can call me prosperous? Yes, the family is not starving, but in fact I am poor, not beggar, but poor. Do I have anything to lose besides children? I will answer no.
        1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 08: 45 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: bmw
          Yes, the family does not starve, but in fact I am poor, not a beggar, but poor

          46 sq. M., no car, no summer cottage. It turns out I am not poor in comparison with you, but a beggar? what But I don’t want to lose this either.
          1. BMW
            BMW 28 October 2015 10: 12 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Bayonet
            46 sq. M., no car, no summer cottage. It turns out I am not poor in comparison with you, but a beggar?

            You need to work more, and not sit on the network and everything will work out. lol It seems so say "cheers-patriots."
            There is no hump, hands with legs cramping does not reduce overvoltage, there are no fatal diseases, it is 100% workable. Work, work and work again. repeat
            Quote: Bayonet
            But I don’t want to lose this either.

            Anyway, they’ll take it away, the full tax will come, you will change it by 33 squares, and in the hut. yes
            1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 11: 12 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: bmw
              Anyway, they’ll take it away, the full tax will come, you will change it by 33 squares, and in the hut.

              Do not give up! am I will shoot back to the penultimate cartridge!
            2. sa-ag 28 October 2015 13: 48 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: bmw
              You need to work more, and not sit on the network and everything will work out.

              A familiar phrase, if only those in power didn’t depreciate the currency, then it might happen, but after all, "... people began to earn more than the cost of labor" (C) D. Medvedev
          2. IS-80 28 October 2015 11: 45 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Bayonet
            46 sq. M., no car, no summer cottage. It turns out I am not poor in comparison with you, but a beggar?

            Why are you clinging to capitalism so much? In fact, you are not a bourgeois, but a proletarian. laughing
            1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 16: 17 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: IS-80
              Why are you clinging to capitalism so much?

              So under socialism there was no apartment, but the car was Luaz. laughing
        2. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 41 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Let me ask, what should I lose?


          Well, apparently, there’s something if, instead of overthrowing the power of the capitalists and neo-slave owners, you’re talking on the site.
        3. Aljavad 29 October 2015 02: 51 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Let me ask, what should I lose?


          You yourself answered:
          Do I have anything to lose besides children?


          The Marxist proletarians lived in barracks and basements, and they could not afford family children. And as soon as they were "arranged" so that they could get married, they forgot about the revolution. They became a "labor aristocracy" (this is according to Marx. He really did not like the bourgeoisie bribing the hegemon and eroding the orderly ranks of the vanguard of the working people.) All the workers now are the same "aristocrats." With an apartment (albeit on a mortgage), with a car (albeit on credit), with his wife a scumbag fur coat, fur coat, fur coat! Yes, children need to be raised! Not to revolution here. And certainly not to strikes. Are you talking about strikes the last time you heard? But in Russia? Here I am about that.

          The author says that soon (from a historical perspective) something else will appear that Marx did not even think about in a nightmare.
      2. EvgNik 28 October 2015 08: 19 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Aljavad
        Everyone has something to lose.

        I would not say. Is that life, children, grandchildren. And it’s junk. No pity.
        1. andj61 28 October 2015 08: 32 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: EvgNik
          Quote: Aljavad
          Everyone has something to lose.

          I would not say. Is that life, children, grandchildren. And it’s junk. No pity.

          That's right - you won’t take anything THERE! good hi Children, friends, relatives - these are real values! yes
          1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 08: 47 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            That's right - you won’t take anything THERE! good hi [/ Quote]
            There are no pockets in the coffin! smile
    2. Name 28 October 2015 09: 31 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Didn’t understand, those rnj cons put that from the Rothschild clan or terry capitalists? laughing
      1. BMW
        BMW 28 October 2015 13: 36 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        Quote: name
        from the Rothschild clan or terry capitalists

        Nope, Putin liberals. wassat
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 1536 28 October 2015 06: 14 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The slave system fell because people were not interested in the results of their labor. There was an example of free people who received notorious profits from their labor and lived happily, albeit difficultly. So this is not an option. Ukraine is their model. A complete change in the consciousness of people, the creation of them zombies and, on this basis, the "elite", gentlemen, the existence of which zombies are not even aware of. Remember the movie "Dead Season". RH gas applied to people forever makes them “happy.”
    1. Aljavad 28 October 2015 06: 53 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      The slave system fell because people were not interested in the results of their labor.


      The slave system fell (quietly resolved), because people (owners of the means of production) were not satisfied with the results of the labor of slaves. Knut did not work further. Tried to combine with the "gingerbread".

      The author writes about the "NEW Slaveholding system." The exact name is not invented. "zombies" or "slaves" - it doesn’t matter.
      1. Babr 28 October 2015 08: 29 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: 1536
        The slave system fell because people were not interested in the results of their labor

        And he was given the illusion of freedom. It seems to be free, it seems to work for itself, but placed in such a framework that the lion's share of his work goes to those who understand more.
        After the Stalinist socialism is no exception.
        The essence of the Stalinist system.
        We will talk about the "Soviet national economy" (for brevity, the "Soviet economy"), referring to the system of socialist management that was created and existed in the USSR under Stalin.
        First, compare the definitions of the basic goals of farms in the old textbooks of the political economy of capitalism and socialism. The main difference is GOALS:
        - under capitalism "for profit",
        - under socialism "with the aim of increasing the welfare of the working people."
        In the current freedom of lies, this is perceived as advertising, agitation. But it was precisely in this ESSENCE of the Stalinist system - the WHOLE (!) System of the national economy existed ONLY (!) For the sake of ensuring the life of the working population.
        The only, but the most important resource that every person as a cell of the Socium possesses from birth is its LIVING LABOR. Here is “in the sweat of his face” - through his own labor a man gets his daily bread.
        For the citizen, the Stalinist system of the national economy acted precisely as the universal “LABOR EXCHANGE SYSTEM” as it happens in a natural organism. Each person could exchange his living labor for a guaranteed set of vital goods at solid prices. The conditions for such an exchange were determined by law.
  5. Kos_kalinki9 28 October 2015 06: 14 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The time has come for military capitalism, where the strong with the help of the army strips the weak. If you can’t sell, then you can select. Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Lebanon are an example of this. How long it will be unknown, but life is becoming more terrible.
    1. BMW
      BMW 28 October 2015 08: 00 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      The time has come for military capitalism, where the strong with the help of the army strips the weak.

      Nooo, the time has come for fascization, since there is no other way. The army is the tool with which this will be achieved.
    2. Uncle Joe 28 October 2015 13: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      The time has come for military capitalism, where the strong with the help of the army strips the weak
      This is called fascism.

      Fascism (Italian: fascismo, from fascio - bundle, bundle, association)
      political current that arose in capitalist countries during the general crisis of capitalism and expressing the interests of the most reactionary and aggressive forces of the imperialist bourgeoisie. F. in power is the terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary forces of monopoly capital, carried out with the aim of preserving the capitalist system. The most important distinguishing features of F. are the use of extreme forms of violence to suppress the working class and all working people, militant anti-communism, chauvinism, racism, the widespread use of state-monopoly methods of regulating the economy, maximum control over all manifestations of the public and personal life of citizens, ramified connections with significant part of the population not belonging to the ruling classes, the ability to mobilize and politically activate through nationalist and social demagogy it is in the interests of the exploiting system (the mass base of France is predominantly the middle layers of capitalist society). Foreign policy F. - the policy of imperialist conquests.
      The common features inherent in F. as a political current do not exclude the existence of its various forms, often determined by the degree of predominance of political or militaristic forces. The predominance of militarist forces is characteristic of fascist military regimes.
      In the struggle to create a mass social base, F. put forward a system of views (the so-called fascist ideology), which used to a large extent reactionary doctrines and theories that had developed before its appearance (racist ideas by J. A. de Gobino, J. V. de Lapuzh , H. Chamberlain et al .; anti-democratic concepts of F. Nietzsche and O. Spengler, anti-Semitism; Geopolitics, Pan-Germanism, etc.).
      At the center of fascist ideology - ideas of military expansion (came to Berlin - we will reach Washington, etc.), racial inequality (Russian spirituality, peculiarity), "class harmony» (reconciliation of red and white for the sake of the country), leaderism (national leader), sovereignty of the state machine (a statesman means a patriot). In the most concentrated form, these ideas were expressed in A. Hitler's book Mine Kampf (from there the now fashionable "national traitor"). A very significant feature of fascist ideology is flashy demagogy in order to mask its true content. This purpose was, in particular, speculative use of F. popularity of the ideas of socialism among the masses (this is including about Katasonov)
      http://enc-dic.com/enc_sovet/Fashizm-93195/
  6. populist 28 October 2015 06: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The classic was in a hurry to impose the death sentence on capitalism. Humanity had to wait another whole century, until, finally, we personally witnessed the death convulsions of capitalism.

    But is not respected Katasonov in a hurry?
    1. Tatyana 28 October 2015 07: 00 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      populist
      But is not respected Katasonov in a hurry?
      Katasonov is in no hurry.
      Moreover, we, ordinary Russians, have been at least 50 years late in unraveling this plan of world bankers - financial capitalists!
      1. Per se. 28 October 2015 10: 20 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Tatiana
        at least 50 years late
        We were late forever, since world capitalism has long been established, having its own rules and pole of power, its transnational masters, and puppeteers of world governments. Russia survived and became a superpower precisely because it once passed to socialism, which allowed not only to preserve the country itself, but also to make the Soviet Union a superpower and give the world multipolarity. If Russia remained with the monarchy or with a government such as Kerensky, it would be unlikely that the country would become a cosmic and nuclear superpower, if it survived at all. Now the working class is being squeezed out of production by automatic machines and robots, it is no longer necessary to hope for its “driving force of revolution”. The developed capitalist countries themselves will not go over to socialism, since in one case private property is at the forefront, and in the other, public, state property. In addition, the US, a gendarme country, in the service of transnational puppeteers, protects the interests of the clan of world ghouls, wreaking havoc and destruction to maintain their power, catching fish in troubled and bloody water. Russia picked up capitalism from the dump of our grandfathers, and there was talk of a "multipolar world" ... It would be interesting to know what comes of all this, in a world where babies will soon begin to implant chips, as identification cards and location control by life, everything and everyone will be listened and viewed. Perhaps the author is right, a new slavery is just around the corner, only "at that beautiful time" I don’t want to live very much. Maybe, in addition to the selfish gain and the general laws of the development of society, something and the idea can change? ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. Mountain shooter 28 October 2015 06: 40 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    An interesting conclusion of the author. Its position is difficult to challenge. Some tectonic processes have shifted. Russia needs to switch to "domestic financing", deep processing of raw materials and ... a powerful defense industry. And to Europe - to go on an excursion.
    1. andj61 28 October 2015 08: 34 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Russia needs to switch to "domestic financing", deep processing of raw materials and ... a powerful defense industry. And to Europe - to go on an excursion.

      On a tour - as usual? On the tank? bully
  8. Bayonet 28 October 2015 06: 51 New
    • -18
    • 0
    -18
    I don’t know when “convulsing” and chronically “decaying” capitalism will fall, but communism is doing badly -
    1. sa-ag 28 October 2015 07: 16 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Quote: Bayonet
      but communism is doing bad

      Well, what can communism do if it didn’t come at all?
      1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 08: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: sa-ag

        Well, what can communism do if it didn’t come at all?

        Well, to put it another way - with the communist ideology. It's time to remove the blinkers ....
        1. sa-ag 28 October 2015 08: 54 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Bayonet
          Well, to put it another way - with the communist ideology. It's time to remove the blinkers ....

          And what is wrong with ideology - a world without wars and troubles, without poor and rich? The idea is spoiled by the implementation of people who are imperfect in themselves
          1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 09: 06 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: sa-ag
            a world without wars and troubles, without the rich and the poor?

            Utopia. At least at this level of human development. And the tales of a "bright future" - ("The Communist Party solemnly promises - the current generation of Soviet people will live under communism!" We have already passed, we have existed under "communism" for 35 years now. laughing
          2. IS-80 28 October 2015 09: 07 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: sa-ag
            And what is wrong with ideology - a world without wars and troubles, without poor and rich?

            This is not so. Man apparently likes to live in such a world with wars, the poor, the rich and other whistles, and you want to take this world from him.
            1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 09: 14 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: IS-80
              Man apparently likes to live in such a world with wars, the poor, the rich and other whistles, and you want to take this world from him.

              Well, as always - to pervert everything and put upside down. Continue comrade agitator. hi
              1. IS-80 28 October 2015 09: 17 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Bayonet
                Well, as always - to pervert everything and put upside down. Continue comrade agitator.

                Quote: Bayonet
                Utopia. At least at this level of human development. And the tales of a "bright future" - ("The Communist Party solemnly promises - the current generation of Soviet people will live under communism!" We have already passed, we have existed under "communism" for 35 years now.

                What is this? smile
                1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 09: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: IS-80
                  What is this?

                  What are you talking about?
                  1. IS-80 28 October 2015 10: 20 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Bayonet
                    What are you talking about?

                    Quote: Bayonet
                    Well, as always - to pervert everything and put upside down. Continue comrade agitator.

                    That's about it.
                    1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 10: 33 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Quote: IS-80
                      That's about it

                      Good. Did I write that I like wars? Why do you ascribe this to me? What for? “I like to live in peace with the poor and rich and other whistles” - whose words are these? I did not write this! Misinterpret why? This is called - vile insinuations!
                      1. IS-80 28 October 2015 10: 45 New
                        • -2
                        • 0
                        -2
                        Quote: Bayonet
                        This is called - vile insinuations!

                        That was an assumption. And not those who are vile. smile You never know how much you like it. And yes, you yourself, however, stop juggling.
                      2. Bayonet 28 October 2015 11: 22 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: IS-80
                        It was an assumption

                        Keep the assumptions with you, and do not put it on public display as the truth! And God forbid, I will lay out my assumptions about you, and there it is ... fellow
                      3. IS-80 28 October 2015 11: 36 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Bayonet
                        Keep the assumptions with you, and do not put it on public display as the truth!

                        Keep your advice for yourself. And stop juggling. smile
        2. sa-ag 28 October 2015 13: 53 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: IS-80
          Man apparently likes to live in such a world with wars, the poor, the rich and other whistles, and you want to take this world from him.

          A man likes to live when he has everything to satisfy his desires and needs, but he doesn’t have all this at one moment of time, he has only some part, but he sees that the other person has other parts and the easiest way is take them away from him, the other person does not understand why something should be taken from him, and now, due to a lack of understanding, all the troubles in the world are :-)
      2. Bayonet 28 October 2015 10: 26 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: sa-ag
        And what is wrong with ideology - a world without wars and troubles, without poor and rich? The idea is spoiled by the implementation of people who are imperfect in themselves

        Well then, there was a sheer smallness - to get rid of people and universal prosperity would come, without wars and troubles, without rich and poor smile
        1. sa-ag 28 October 2015 13: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Bayonet
          Well then, there was a sheer small thing - to get rid of people

          Well, you have decisions, you need to improve them, setting a new course of development, moving away from primitive consumption to a higher one - building, you need to set a goal for society and guidelines for achieving this goal
          1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 15: 01 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: sa-ag
            Well, you have a solution,

            Joke smile The easiest solution to problems! hi
      3. Aljavad 29 October 2015 03: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And what is wrong with ideology - a world without wars and troubles, without poor and rich? The idea is spoiled by the implementation of people who are imperfect in themselves


        So kill them all nah. and there will be peace without wars and troubles, without the rich and the poor. And Greenpeace will like it: no one else pollutes the environment! am

        And believers of all gods are satisfied: everyone is in paradise. am
    2. IS-80 28 October 2015 09: 03 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      Quote: Bayonet
      It's time to remove the blinkers ....

      So take off your blinkers. What bother you? Are they holding hands? smile
      1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 09: 47 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: IS-80
        So take off your blinkers. What bother you? Are they holding hands?

        I took off my blinkers about 40 years ago. hi
        1. IS-80 28 October 2015 10: 26 New
          • -2
          • 0
          -2
          Quote: Bayonet
          I took off my blinkers about 40 years ago.

          Not thrown off, put on. smile
  • Aljavad 28 October 2015 07: 07 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The air smelled of thunder ...
    Many feel. Although they can’t say exactly what. Something is coming, some unknown boulders in incomprehensible depths have set in motion and changes are coming.
    Hence the tantrums with the "end of the world", an asteroid and the Mayan calendar.
    No! not today, and not this year! When? But God knows him ... Maybe already. How the Yalta-Helsinki system is a thing of the past. After the Crimea? Or after Tskhinval? Or maybe after the withdrawal of the Group of Soviet Forces from Germany? Unclear. Our grandchildren will understand when they become grandfathers.
    The difficult thing is to study the process from the inside. But it is necessary. Even if you make a mistake, give food for conversation and, perhaps, in discussion, you will also be born (Truth, non-Truth, what is Truth?) Understanding of the direction the world is heading ...

    Thanks for posting!
    1. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well said, poetic and true. Respect.
  • Neophyte 28 October 2015 07: 16 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Post-capitalism or the non-slave system, in essence, is all that science fiction writers promised us: a human society in the form of a pyramid, where the rulers are at the top and the castes of scientists, guards and other people are at the bottom! But isn’t that right now?
    1. sa-ag 28 October 2015 07: 26 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Neophyte
      Post-capitalism or the non-slave system, in fact, everything that science fiction writers promised us

      Well, yes - "Inhabited Island", only in modern technological design
  • Ponomarev 28 October 2015 07: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    So the modern capitalist system - this is slavery in a sophisticated form. And capital is not an end in itself, but a means of controlling and affirming one’s power. To imagine the Rothschilds and the like as stingy knights is, in my opinion, stupid. And I consider fascism the highest stage of capitalism. Either capitalism dies / dies and socialism with faith in God is born in its place, or capitalism wins, degenerates into fascism and destroys human civilization. I think so.
    1. igordok 28 October 2015 08: 10 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Ponomarev
      So the modern capitalist system - this is slavery in a sophisticated form.

      The most relish is that slaves do not even suspect that they are slaves.
      1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 08: 54 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: igordok
        The most relish is that slaves do not even suspect that they are slaves.

        Wow! Especially if they are hammered every day that they are the happiest people and live in a state with the fairest system. Take North Korea for example. smile
        1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 11: 17 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Bayonet
          Take North Korea for example.

          Ku-ku Kimushka! Offended? smile
  • Wise Kaa 28 October 2015 07: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For the world money-lenders, Wall Street, the City of London and other banking centers of the country, the periphery of world capitalism is a "lifeline."


    It is strange that Russia is the life buoy for Wall Street loan sharks. Despite the fact that we are allegedly waging a hybrid war with the West.

    Today's capitalism is already different. At the beginning of this year, Jacob Rothschild, president and main shareholder of the RIT Capital Partners investment fund, published an annual report on the fund’s performance in 2014. In it, he recognized that in the coming years the main goal of the business would not be capital gain, but its preservation.


    Of course, we have already accumulated such enormous wealth, where already further? !!! they don’t already know what to do with it, fat rage !!! and to an ordinary Russian citizen or third-world citizen, their possibilities never dreamed of ...
  • Monster_Fat 28 October 2015 07: 46 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The author is both right and wrong at the same time. It is true that capitalism is striving for a slave system, but the classical type of slave system is not profitable for capitalists - labor is not efficient there and profit is not large, a new type of slave system will be based on controlling the desires of the crowd using MASS-MEDIA and artificial, inflated "fears "making the crowd stick tightly in the stall. However, capitalists have one big problem - too many people. They need to reduce the mass of people at least 2-3 times. What are they working on now. Nuclear general warfare is not an option, as it will make the planet unsuitable for living or living will not be comfortable on it, so the work is going on in terms of applying diseases, spreading pedorastia, local wars, establishing regimes with explicit and hidden genocide of the population, etc. On the other on the other hand, the author does not quite correctly characterize the fact that the “negative” bank interest and the departure to hedge funds is caused precisely by backstage activities, by some plans of the “world” government. This is not true . The fact that everyone is trying to “fix” capital is precisely caused by the instability of the world economy. No one in their right mind wants to develop production, create new enterprises, invest in a new “business” on a long-term basis because they do not know what will happen next in the world economic and political environment, where the political and economic situation will turn. Capital does not like risk — it loves “orderliness” and “progression”. Now the world is shaken by the most “I can’t” - there is nowhere “stability” from here and there is a reason that everyone is trying to quickly “withdraw” capital by abandoning production or something else. The world can well be “shaken" painlessly and cause its new development, for this you need the following: 1-stop the war, where by force, where by negotiations, but stop. 2-cause people to have a new wave of desire to "consume", for this it is necessary to move to a new round of "Wishlist" - start building floating, flying, underwater cities, etc., start interplanetary flights, etc. That is, we need to interest humanity to invest in completely new "desires", which, already, will drag along everything else: economy, finance, politics, etc.
    1. Uncle Joe 28 October 2015 14: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      a new type of slave system will be based on controlling the desires of the crowd with the help of MASS MEDIA and artificial, inflated "fears" that force the crowd to stay closely in the stall
      What Katasonov and is engaged in hiding behind socialist rhetoric.

      However, capitalists have one big problem - too many people
      This is just not a problem - reducing the population is quite simple.

      The problem of the capitalists is that there are too many capitalists themselves, by definition who cannot help but compete with each other, and therefore there can be no terrible things about any world government (or the world conspiracy of bankers and the like crap) described by Katasonov. speech - otherwise, humanity would have lived in an electronic concentration camp for at least 20 years, and Katasonov would not have written his opportunistic horror stories.
      1. alicante11 28 October 2015 15: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        otherwise humanity would have lived in an electronic concentration camp for at least 20 years


        You are almost right, there is no world government, but there is a conspiracy of super-rich people. In principle, their conspiracy is only to complete victory, then they will also be overwhelmed. But the problem is not with a large number of "other capitalists". Any capitalists on Earth can easily be stalled with the help of a Naglosaxon club. The problem is that there is such a Russia with its vigorous truncheon and with its capitalists, this tandem is definitely not going to go round on a crooked goat. The USSR elite surrendered because it was shown to it that it can have more than it had, and the current elite has nothing more to show, therefore it can surrender only itself, and our oligarchs will not go for it, you want to live, but except in Russia they will not live.
        1. Tatyana 28 October 2015 18: 07 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          alicante11 (6)
          You are almost right, there is no world government, but there is a conspiracy of super-rich people. Etc.
          Dear alicante11 (6)!
          You have a great comment!
          The pyramidality of network capitalism never ends. At the top of the capitalists, when they are enriched, there will be any one clan clan of the capitalists, or one person in general, who will take the rest of humanity with him to the “grave” with superparayoyal personal egoism. Those. make the "end of the world"!
        2. Uncle Joe 28 October 2015 21: 49 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: alicante11
          You are almost right
          I am somewhat more right than almost.

          Capital is able to unite only to uphold its class interests, when the prerequisites are formed for its disappearance as a class. In all other cases, temporary alliances against competitors are possible, but nothing more - everyone pulls a blanket over themselves (you die today, and I will tomorrow).

          A small country’s small business is headlong in an attempt to become medium-sized.
          Medium-sized businesses scream about the need to support small and medium-sized businesses with the goal of becoming large.
          Big business is trying to become transnational.
          Transnationals squabble among themselves for the redivision of the world market.
          Raw materials squabble over the state budget with production workers.
          Regional business alliances are bickering among themselves, and their members among themselves.
          The bourgeois bureaucracy, which is the arbiter, has concentrated in its hands the mechanisms of legal and power regulation, having family ties and common "business" interests with business at all levels, is being sold at auction.
          And all of the above, which are an absolute minority, in the face of the need for constant expansion of the sales market (and hence the redistribution of the market either through war or through competitive mechanisms) are forced to balance on the brink beyond which the majority, which is both the main production resource and the sales market , they will simply be swept away.

          At this level of conflict of interest, we agree and create a management system - a world government, a planetary state, etc. - simply impossible.

          Any capitalists on Earth can easily be stalled with the help of a Naglosaxon club
          Is the Naglosaxon club something from a parallel world on a contract, or are quite real groups of different levels and qualities of the bourgeoisie and bureaucracy constantly in a state of conflict of interest?

          The problem is that there is such a Russia with its vigorous club and with its capitalists
          This is not a problem - there are still China, India, Pakistan and their capitalists.

          The opposition of the Russian Federation to the West is a substitution of concepts to the detriment of the interests of the majority, in the interests of the Russian bourgeoisie and the oligarchy: the contradictions between the Russian Federation and the West do not exist because of differences in goals, but solely because of differences in views on who needs what part of the common pie get it.

          Actually, capitalism in the stage of imperialism is essentially no different from the squabbles of urban criminal groups for spheres of influence - it’s just that the scale is larger, and the modern RF in this regard is completely identical to the West.

          I want to live, but except in Russia they will not live.
          Not true: in Russia they will live only as long as they are in business.
          And a competitor who has retired from business is a danger - they don’t touch him, and he manages himself at his discretion (and his children, all the more so).
  • akudr48 28 October 2015 08: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Moreover, the power over people should extend to their consciousness

    The key idea. But then even worse.

    The "owners of money" in a "planned manner" prepare mankind for the transition to another model, where they could remain masters, but not of money, but of the whole world as a combination of natural resources, material productive forces and all people on the planet.

    That is, there is not a classless society ahead, where you only pay taxes and sleep peacefully, whether you are a billionaire or a Tajik, as the people assure the propaganda, but a superclass society, where the elite is separated by an abyss from the rest of the people.

    Information ideological processing along with automation of production will allow the "golden" billion to completely do without the annoying rest of the world's population.

    And the new ruling class will not even need taxes from the lower classes, from the p.ep.h.h.o.t.i., from the formerly bolsheviks, but the lower classes themselves will not be needed.

    Good article, with a far horizon of vision.

    Kasatonov, Glazyev, Fursov, Delyagin and others, they need to be read, they write a lot and correctly, not only about close issues, but also about how things will calm down in the future.
  • sledge 28 October 2015 10: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Not bad! Put + There is something to think about
  • anip 28 October 2015 10: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    So far, loans have not reached negative interest rates, but positive values ​​in some cases have decreased to 2-3%. Money has become almost free. And in some countries where there is at least slight inflation, real interest rates (nominal rates adjusted for changes in the purchasing power of money) have gone into the negative zone.

    Only here the Russian Federation does not apply to these "some countries". Inflation is high, interest rates on loans are even greater.
  • lexx2038 28 October 2015 11: 13 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    "" The core of the capitalist model is banks with their loan interest. ""
    Well then, in Russia the wildest capitalism is in its worst manifestations.
    1. Bayonet 28 October 2015 11: 33 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: lexx2038
      Well then, in Russia the wildest capitalism is in its worst manifestations.

      Who would doubt that! That's what the other cap was ill with. countries a long time ago, we will be tormented for a long time. What kind of Russian "businessman" will mess up with small things - 100% profit at least! To deceive, rob, steal is a good thing. And after all, "we (they) are all from the people, children of the working-class family."
  • rennim 28 October 2015 11: 22 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    They will also remember ... Lenin’s grandfather. Still, the most intelligent and perspicacious was Man.
  • NordUral 28 October 2015 11: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But on the periphery of world capitalism, central banks are strictly forbidden to engage in "quantitative easing." They were ordered to engage in exactly the opposite - "quantitative tightening." Simply put, squeezing the money supply. Therefore, on the periphery of world capitalism, interest rates remain (for now) at a high level.
    How disgusting it sounds to a Russian citizen who has lived most of his life in the Union, that we are the periphery of the world system. Great result of change.

    But to change the situation in the country can only exit from this same periphery, the break of dependence on financial sharks of the golden billion and the creation of closed from the influence of currencies
    West, primarily the dollar and the euro. Moreover, even the social system does not need to be changed, only to turn wild feudal capitalism into state capitalism with a national economy.
    Although one cardinal action for this will have to be done - a revision of the privatization of the 90s and the full nationalization of industry and raw materials of the country.
  • Straight 28 October 2015 11: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Still, capitalism will be replaced by communism-socialism, and somewhere there will be a "slave system." No wonder, after all, some tribes still live in the Stone Age. It is assumed that Russia will again be ahead of the transition to communism.
  • over 28 October 2015 13: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    COMRADES, YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS !!!!
    1. Uncle Joe 28 October 2015 14: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: over
      Comrades, you should know about it !!!!
      And about that.

  • Mestny 28 October 2015 13: 34 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Max_Bauder
    there will be a reduction, but many will survive, half or a third for sure, this is enough for the Zionist masses to re-grow their "cattle".

    I agree.
    The only thing that stops them is an unwarranted 100% implementation of such a scenario. While it can fly by itself. Or, as they put it, "we may receive unacceptable damage."
    But as soon as their analysts conclude that the damage becomes acceptable to them, they will begin a nuclear apocalypse at that very moment.
    Their work on this is proceeding systematically in all directions. One of which, importantly, is the demonization of Russia and of anyone else in general, even hindering such plans to a small extent.
  • Vlad5307 28 October 2015 20: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "And in a" planned manner "they are preparing humanity for a transition to another model, where they could remain masters, but not of money, but of the whole world as a combination of natural resources, material productive forces and all people on the planet."
    I fully support the author of the article - here I have a complete coincidence with him, although I’m not an economist, but “gut” is
    felt. And he wrote more than once that after the death of Stalin the CPSU stopped developing the teachings and analyzing the development of imperialism, and began exporting revolutions to the wild tribes of Africa, thoughtlessly squandering the country's billions of funds. All this was the predominance of the line of Comrade Trotsky, proclaiming the slogan of "permanent revolution." It was with this line in the party that Stalin fought so fiercely and was right. These followers of Trotsky, by and large, led the USSR to collapse! crying
  • Concealer 28 October 2015 20: 35 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Capitalism is indeed long dead. We are dealing with a corpse. But the author is silent about the objective and real reasons for his death. Abstractions of “loan interest” and horror stories of high-tech slavery are again used.
    But all these horror stories from unwillingness to see the essence and true causes of the predictable death of capitalism. And without an understanding of the essence of the process, there is no understanding of the way out of the impasse of the economic model. This is not at all a matter of economics, but a matter of developing social production.
    Some beautiful words and nothing to the point.
  • andrew42 29 October 2015 11: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If you rise above the forest, then capitalism did not go anywhere from slavery. The whole difference in the way slaves are motivated is by food and stick, or by the means of exchanging the products of labor, that is, money, that is, part of capital. More flexible, more sophisticated. But the trouble is, the owner of capital (as opposed to the working owner) also becomes a slave to capital, which, without saving and multiplying, loses meaning for him, and the tail begins to play as a dog. The slave owner was freer than his next evolutionary link, the capitalist, although both are parasites. As a result, we have Slavery / Feudalism / Capitalism on one side of the scales, and Socialism on the opposite side of the scales. And so for thousands of years. In any case, the redistribution of surplus value is based on the military (physical) force used by the slave owner / feudal lord / capitalist / imperialist. The "large-scale" algorithm for the actions of such a defendant, or rather a consortium of such, is the macroeconomics of the United States, - it cannot live without profit from wars.
  • Straight 29 October 2015 12: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And Lenin is so young and young October ahead! Communism is our future. China is an example. Social security and programs in Western countries are socialism within capitalism. Moreover, the more socialism the higher the standard of living of the people in the capital. So communism did not go anywhere, it grows and develops from within capitalism - all according to the theory of Marxism. So comrades ...
  • atos_kin 29 October 2015 13: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Like it or not, but humanity is doomed ... to socialism! The big "American Spring" is just around the corner. Then at the exit - the Union of Socialist States of America, the Union of Socialist Euro-Asian Republics, the Union of Socialist Arab States, etc.