In the United States have experienced aviation laser gun

The American company Lockheed Martin conducted a test of a combat laser mounted on an aircraft with a wide sector of shelling of air targets, reports Popular Mechanics with a link to Lockheedmartin.com.




New technology developed by the order of the Pentagon and the Air Force research laboratory. The system allows the onboard laser to fire at targets at near-sonic speeds.

“The system of adaptive optical beam control (ABC) is an optical lens, the shape of which is designed to create less turbulent flows, as well as a set of deformable mirrors that correct the focus of the laser beam,” the developer’s website says.

“During test flights of an aviation combat laser, it turned out that turbulent flows occurring at transonic flight speeds violate the focusing of the laser beam, which leads to power dissipation,” the report states. “However, if the shooting is at flight, the laser power is not dissipated.”

The developers note that "the adaptive ABC system will allow the use of powerful combat lasers on advanced sixth generation fighters."



Photos used:
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vorobey 26 October 2015 17: 26 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Lockheed Martin is not the one that the successful Fu35 built ...? another five were not finished but already dream about the sixth
    1. Major Yurik 26 October 2015 17: 32 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Vaguely I see a laser shooting down an airplane during aerobatics. But for the downing of a peaceful "passenger", in order to provoke another provocation, the Khokhlo-Amer syndicate will probably work! am
      1. GSH-18 26 October 2015 17: 42 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: Major Yurik
        Vaguely I see a laser shooting down an airplane during aerobatics. But for the downing of a peaceful "passenger", in order to provoke another provocation, the Khokhlo-Amer syndicate will probably work! am

        Theoretically, this is quite possible. But for practice, there is not enough power plant with a capacity of several tens of megawatts. Well, if the mattress can shove it onto the plane (so that it also flies! laughing ), then there is no bazaar, everything will turn out! good Good luck to the cutters! wink
        1. Penetrator 26 October 2015 17: 58 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: GSH-18
          Well, if the mattress can put one into the plane (so that it also flies!), Then there is no bazaar, everything will work out!

          Nothing complicated, a power cable from a ground power source and FSE! laughing
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 26 October 2015 19: 05 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Penetrator
            Nothing complicated, power cable from a ground power source and FSO

            This is somehow uninteresting. Let's better remember SOI, a nuclear-pumped laser. Those. on a plane we undermine the atomic bomb, and the energy from its detonation - to “pump” the laser ... There IMHO there was only one problem - mankind did not learn how to control the power of the nuclear device detonation, you want to get 20 kilotons, or maybe 18 or 25, so the first application of such a device was the last ... But what? States themselves said that the sixth generation would be unmanned. So why not be one-time? This is a profit - instead of some 2,5 thousand F-35 there, you can drive all 25 thousand into the budget ...laughing
        2. serg2.72 26 October 2015 18: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          No one is going to use the laser in continuous mode. Trying to achieve the shortest, most powerful impulse. Moreover, this will be useful not only in the combat version, but also in normal communication through the "fiber". As a rule, the shorter the impulses, the more information no one has canceled.
          1. Yuriy_999 26 October 2015 19: 24 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            you are confusing different things. The information is carried not by the pulse duration, but by the frequency (although they are connected directly) per unit time. The transmitted energy is also connected with this (only already in the opposite direction). The frequency of data transmission on mobile transmission - 2.7 GHz.
            Imagine what kind of energy you need to transfer in 1/2700 000 seconds to destroy even a small piece of iron. So the example is not correct
            By the way, this also leads to a massive transition to mobile communications from conventional transmission narrowly targeted radio antennas (essentially the same laser but of a different power and range) to an optical fiber that is not subject to atmospheric and other interference
        3. renics 26 October 2015 19: 00 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          That is what was closed, and in my opinion the next informational stuffing. Since before it was not possible to solve the problem of absorption of scattering of a focused beam in the atmosphere over a large distance, as a result of which the radiation power is lost. Scattering and absorption are effects that occur at the quantum level, and single photons will be removed from the laser beam by statistical
          way. Therefore, the beam diameter will not change, and only the total power will decrease
          which is transmitted along with the beam. For the wavelength of a powerful LWB laser (1,3 μm) and a path of 100 km at an altitude of 12 km, the transmission is 96 percent. For a path starting at an altitude of 12 km and reaching the earth's surface at a distance of 100 km, the transmittance will be 22 percent. Both values ​​correspond to a clear sky without clouds and rain. Settlements with rain on
          beam paths result in 100 percent absorption, or zero transmission.
          For strategic applications, laser power in the megawatt area is desired. Such power levels can also be achieved with chemical lasers that have been developed for military programs. Unlike semiconductor and solid state lasers with electrical energy, chemical lasers use chemical energy to create a beam. The chemicals used are continuously pumped into the reaction chamber.
          It is not possible to put LWB on airplanes of the 6th generation, due to technical difficulties, installation only on a Boeing 747.
          From foreign materials. Assessment of Long Range Laser Weapon Enga
          gements: The Case of the Airborne Laser.
          Jan Stupl and Goetz NeuneckScience and Global Security, 2010, Volume 18, pp. 160
    2. Aksakal_07 26 October 2015 17: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So for them in the first place is the promotion (promotion) of the project in order to cut down more money on military orders.
    3. adept666 26 October 2015 17: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Lockheed Martin is not the one that the successful Fu35 was honored ...
      They are the most smile
  2. Mama_Cholli 26 October 2015 17: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Star wars in the Earth’s atmosphere begin ... The death star is on its way ...
    1. vorobey 26 October 2015 17: 29 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Mama_Cholli
      Star wars in the Earth’s atmosphere begin ... The death star is on its way ...


      Oh mom cholly .. what is life ... it's a long jump from ... to the grave. one fix end is inevitable .. laughing

      I also had a friend who invented a combat laser ... threw glasses on a surprise ... Octavia was put out by the whole collective farm ..
      1. Mama_Cholli 27 October 2015 11: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: vorobey
        Quote: Mama_Cholli
        Star wars in the Earth’s atmosphere begin ... The death star is on its way ...


        Oh mom cholly .. what is life ... it's a long jump from ... to the grave. one fix end is inevitable .. laughing

        I also had a friend who invented a combat laser ... threw glasses on a surprise ... Octavia was put out by the whole collective farm ..

        This would not have happened with the old UAZ, there the torpedo was almost cast-iron ...

        pisi:
        I know about the long jump ... Moreover, Klitschko suggested that all Ukrainians prepare for the land.
        I myself feel that I'm flying, it's time to pull the ring to slow down. Only a little point, I didn’t fold the parachute ....
  3. science fiction writer 26 October 2015 17: 27 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Yesterday, Israel, today, the United States broke loose with these losers,
    who are you trying to catch on horror ?????
    1. venaya 26 October 2015 17: 37 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: fiction
      Yesterday, Israel, today, the United States broke the chain with these losers, are you trying to catch up with something terrible ?????

      So the need compels. It is necessary not only to create analogues, but first of all to find real methods of counteracting the attacks of the alleged enemy. Something seems to me that this is more important now.
      1. Andrea 26 October 2015 17: 49 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Rather, an attempt to direct the enemy along the wrong path of research, load heads and divert funds into a futile project.
      2. science fiction writer 26 October 2015 17: 49 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        but first of all, find real methods of counteracting the attacks of the alleged enemy

        MIRROR
        laughing
  4. Vladimyrych 26 October 2015 17: 27 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    ... While fools live in the world, To deceive us, therefore, with our hands ...
    Cut the military budget forever! laughing
  5. Mainbeam 26 October 2015 17: 28 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    What about the battery?
    A beautiful picture was drawn with a drone, but is there enough carrying capacity?
    1. paxil 26 October 2015 17: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: MainBeam
      What about the battery?
      A beautiful picture was drawn with a drone, but is there enough carrying capacity?

      Well, in a drone a nuclear reactor fellow
      1. GDP
        GDP 26 October 2015 17: 40 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        in a heavy eight-wheeled truck, the Americans managed to push the 10 kW battery to the laser ...
        in August of 2015, it was somehow finally possible to burn the 1 drone out of it. True installation fired not in motion and in good weather.
        Claimed range 1,5-2 km
        So think about how such a miracle the size of a railway car should be hung from a drone and what will be the effectiveness if successful ...
        laughing
        by the way I don’t know exactly how this Hal is, and the predecessor of this truck cost the states in 400 000 000 $ - 1pcs.
        in my opinion a little expensive for the infernal destroyer of drones ....
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. tforik 26 October 2015 18: 31 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          400 million tanks is not a truck, but a reserve in technologies that can lead to a breakthrough or cost-effective technologies. Remember the cut when the Internet was invented? Also the military network was ..
          .
          And about the capacities of electric energy, technologies are also developing. For example, the project of Tesla cars Ilona Mask. ICE will die soon campaign))
          Yes, and no one canceled the capacitors, they are cheap and can give out tremendous power for a short time. That is enough for a serial laser gun. Time will tell)
          1. Colonel 26 October 2015 18: 59 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: tforik
            Yes, and no one canceled the capacitors

            This is exactly the same as charging them. And with the laser they have the same crap as with the exoskeleton. Everything works, only the power cable is asked not to show.
            1. sharp-lad 26 October 2015 21: 37 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Because it is tied to the generator! laughing
            2. tforik 26 October 2015 22: 07 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Yes, fun with the wire))
              Installation on ships is possible, there can be any mass (energy).
  6. paxil 26 October 2015 17: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Damn s such dreamers Yeshkin cat laughing It’s unclear what they themselves swell in. They themselves don’t know how it will work. wassat
    1. Kos_kalinki9 26 October 2015 21: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: paxil
      Damn s such dreamers Yeshkin cat laughing It’s unclear what they themselves swell in. They themselves don’t know how it will work. wassat

      Well, why clung to the Americans. they know their job tightly
  7. horoh 26 October 2015 17: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What is this, another scam on the headstock?
  8. VladimS 26 October 2015 17: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Fenix-15
    What kind of sawmill, however, is being prepared if they talk about the 6-e generation of fighters, when they still did not figure it out with the 5-m.

    Yes, reading this .. our involved., Probably came out with saliva, poor fellows! :-)
  9. Andrea 26 October 2015 17: 30 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The thing is not credible. Fog, dust, just dirty air significantly (many times) reduce the energy of the beam.
    New-well-forgotten old. In the USSR, they tried to put experimental combat lasers on ships because of the bulkiness and consumption of a huge amount of energy. Then they upgraded to a cargo plane, but did not get satisfactory results.
    What do the Yankees offer this time? Another throw of desa?
  10. A1L9E4K9S 26 October 2015 17: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    However, if shooting is carried out at the heading of the flight, the laser power is not dissipated. ”

    Yeah, and the targets will hang and wait for them to aim.
    1. venaya 26 October 2015 17: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      However, if shooting is carried out at the heading of the flight, the laser power is not dissipated. ”
      Yeah, and the targets will hang and wait for them to aim.

      Here are the options. It is not necessary to aim all the time, it is possible to water with a laser beam, so to speak in the "non-stop" mode. "What a new day prepares for us ...". Is it reality or horror stories? Wait and see.
      1. Andrea 26 October 2015 17: 57 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Nonsense! You will have to drag an atomic reactor with you to water, but you can tweet quickly and quickly, this is real, but I wrote above that this is a futile direction for many reasons.
        1. venaya 26 October 2015 18: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Andrea
          You can tweet quickly, quickly, it’s real, but I wrote above that this is a futile direction for many reasons.

          Before, I would completely agree with you, but as time goes on, new opportunities arise and, after them, new solutions. "you can tweet quickly"- it is possible, but it is possible and more than once to tweet, but to do it with a certain period of time. Yes, how many opportunities open up, can you take everything into account?
          1. sharp-lad 26 October 2015 21: 47 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Time passes, here you are right, but even with the passage of time the laws of physics do not change. Do you know that a laser beam, starting with a certain energy density, begins to jam itself?
            1. gridasov 26 October 2015 22: 09 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Or maybe he is transforming into a new state?
      2. sharp-lad 26 October 2015 21: 44 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And now everything is "watered" with the rays of rangefinder lasers, target illumination, spotters of fire and the like! That's just hit the target with something else. Atmospheric interference of natural and artificial origin reduces all the advantages of laser weapons to practical zero, leaving only the possibility of blinding the optics and eyes of the enemy.
  11. Boa kaa 26 October 2015 17: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Have experienced ... And what brought down? The beam is scattered, there is still not enough power ... And there too - GUN! It may be more modest: - "prototyp" guns, well, "installation" ... And then: "Gun-Gun." Enchanted you are mine, sub-Americans! am
    1. gridasov 26 October 2015 18: 39 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      And what? Basic technologies mastered, and add email. magnetic induction coils on a spin pulse and the beam will not be scattered.
  12. viktorrymar 26 October 2015 17: 32 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Today is a straight day of laser weapons, then Jews, then Americans .... Fantasy Day ....
  13. venaya 26 October 2015 17: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Adaptive Optical Beam Control (ABC)

    Well, at last the publications began, revealing the nuances of technical realizations of real combat laser devices. Now komenty can be closer to realities.
    1. Mainbeam 26 October 2015 17: 38 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      I wonder why a combat laser is needed? What can a laser do that a six-barrel self-tapping screw or a rocket cannot be launched at 400 km? Drones shoot down? Fighter aircraft during maneuvering air combat? Cruise missiles at an altitude of 100 meters above the ground? How long does it take to keep the laser on the object of destruction; how much does it take to fly behind an object at the same speed? Does turbulence caused by the target itself reduce the effectiveness of the lesion?

      What for? (cut in the answer not to offer)

      .
      1. venaya 26 October 2015 17: 50 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: MainBeam
        What such a laser can do ... shoot down drones? Fighter aircraft during maneuvering air combat? Rocket wings at a height of 100 meters above the ground? How long does it take to keep the laser at the destruction facility; how much does it take to fly behind an object at the same speed?

        "how much does it take to fly behind an object at the same speed?"- you can fly even in the opposite direction, this is not a problem."How long does it take to keep the laser on the object of destruction"- until the moment of defeat arrives. In principle, it may not come, but it’s worth a try. But as for drones, it’s, in my opinion, the most real object for sure destruction. We’ll wait and see what the coming day is for us.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. venaya 26 October 2015 18: 02 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: MainBeam
            at heading courses at transonic speed
            During test flights of an aviation combat laser, it turned out that turbulent flows arising at transonic flight speeds disrupt the focusing of the laser beam, which leads to power dissipation, the message says. - However, if shooting is carried out at the heading of the flight, the laser power is not dissipated

            Maybe we’ll try to read more closely. Tests are underway, the intermediate results are seriously considered, not understanding the essence of what is happening, clearly not worth it. It seems that one and the same article can be understood in completely opposite senses, it all depends on the individual practice of the reader.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. venaya 26 October 2015 18: 57 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: MainBeam
                In the opposite direction - is it not on the opposite courses or what? If the distance from each other, then there is generally trouble with the distance, and, accordingly, with the effectiveness of the use of "death rays". The questions were not about the article, but about the necessity, expediency and prospects of applying a combat laser to a person who wrote:

                1. As for efficiency, in this case, one should agree, but only with the installation parameters described in this article, and not at all.
                2. In general, about the prospects? I try to write about this. Maybe something I know about the prospects, I had to argue for a long time. The question is decided here, on this site, apparently without prospects, I consider it possible only to express my own, personal opinion. My personal opinion is that people who have not studied this question deeply are able to consider this question too superficially, I noticed this in personal practice. I am more concerned with the question of how exactly the use of radiation weapons is possible, the problems of tactics of application and the economic efficiency of this application. It takes a long time to think and discuss, but only with interested parties, I think you will agree with me on this.
                1. gridasov 26 October 2015 19: 08 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  You can talk a lot, but it is unlikely to be useful. Because the fundamental ideology is based on the ideology of creating the elemental base of the last century. There are few people who are generally able to understand that the potential of future generators and accumulators of energy is inherent in its density in space. And then the conversation begins. Or someone offers ideas, and the rest begin to blaspheme him. Or just again endless conversations.
                  First, it’s worth understanding what a ray of light is. And why in the atmosphere of the Earth it has some properties, but in space are different.
      2. sharp-lad 26 October 2015 21: 59 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        There is no need to take various amendments, in other words - where I aimed, I got there. But only in space, far from massive stars and black "holes"!
        1. Mainbeam 28 October 2015 18: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: sharp-lad
          simply put - where I aimed, I got there.

          Clear and understandable. Thank.

          However, the question remains about the power of the beam. That is, the beam must instantly destroy the structure, because long-term guidance to one point is unlikely. The destruction time is determined by the pulse power. If the beam is wide and does not need to be kept for a long time at one infinitesimal point, then again due to power.
  14. Tusv 26 October 2015 17: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    About this popmek wrote about five to seven years ago. And they also successfully passed the tests. It turns out this test is successful more successful?
  15. Gor-1974 26 October 2015 17: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, everyone has prepared for the coming to the world of artificial intelligence, it remains only to track down Sarah Connor. (Based on the terminator) It's time for us to test seismic weapons. (based on San Andreas Rift)
    1. Tusv 26 October 2015 17: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Gor-1974
      It's time for us to test seismic weapons. (based on San Andreas Rift)

      Well it already was. Fifty nuclear torpedoes were sent to California during the Caribbean crisis. Bam and in a few seconds a quarter of the Stalin Strait was built
  16. Furious bambr 26 October 2015 17: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Star Wars 8: Revenge of the Psychos wassat
  17. Vasyan1971 26 October 2015 17: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    That is, they will only fight in clear, cloudless weather against a balloon tied with four ropes?
    Your Pentagon is wonderful!
  18. pvv113 26 October 2015 17: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    New technology developed by order of the Pentagon

    I came across an article that this project was developed on the basis of documents stolen from us in the 90s.
    1. Tusv 26 October 2015 17: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: pvv113
      based on documents stolen from us in the 90s.

      Why stolen? The Americans honestly bought the manual. For a penny, but honestly
  19. voyaka uh 26 October 2015 17: 44 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Original article:
    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2015/october/space-lase-dar
    pa.html

    This is still a prototype on a test jet laboratory airplane (top photo on VO).
    They were interested in how to direct a laser at near-sound speeds.
    1. Tusv 26 October 2015 18: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      They were interested in how to direct a laser at near-sound speeds.

      Again, a dirty trick is being prepared with a Malaysian Boeing probably. For we have subsonic MLRS da Pinocchio. The rest seems to be from 2 max and higher
  20. Alex Nick 26 October 2015 17: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    That is, they will only fight in clear, cloudless weather against a balloon tied with four ropes?
    Your Pentagon is wonderful!

    And in the fog will be a truce.
  21. tomket 26 October 2015 17: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    loot is a relative thing, especially for Americans
  22. Vadim12 26 October 2015 18: 03 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    It can even be used on drones, and not spend on them air-to-air missiles at a meeting. In Syria, for example. wink
    1. NDR-791 26 October 2015 18: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why is it so complicated? Enough GSH-30!
  23. NDR-791 26 October 2015 18: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “During test flights of an aviation combat laser, it turned out that turbulent flows occurring at transonic flight speeds violate the focusing of the laser beam, which leads to power dissipation,” the report states. “However, if the shooting is at flight, the laser power is not dissipated.”

    The developers note that "the adaptive ABC system will allow the use of powerful combat lasers on advanced sixth generation fighters."

    Here is such garbage! Two paragraphs side by side are absolutely contradictory to each other. F-35 didn’t really fly among the craftsmen, but it’s surely so about the weapons of the sixth generation ... But if he puts this economy on predator, it’s a lot of cost to fight with dukers because it’s only effective against them, but give us something by harder. It seems that the topic is closed and declassified. for us, the analogue of "spooki", even with the latest laser model, is just a good target.
  24. uzer 13 26 October 2015 18: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Every six months, an article about testing such a laser is regularly published in the press. All that remains is to make a parabolic mirror and stock up on sulfur fuel, that’s the finished hyperboloid. What difference does it make to inhale people, the American people are illegible in nuances. How interesting, the beam focusing device works without feedback, borrowed the idea of ​​a flashlight?
  25. alex-defensor 26 October 2015 18: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    **********************************
  26. niki233 26 October 2015 18: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Why drag this stuff here? nothing more to write about?
  27. V0l0dimir 26 October 2015 18: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Surely this super weapon is designed to bring down air defense condoms from ISIS stuffed with explosives.
  28. Tusv 26 October 2015 18: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: niki233
    Why drag this stuff here? nothing more to write about?

    Well so Caliber was tested in public, what will happen if they test the X one hundred and second? Immediately 14 missile missiles will pass successful tests (the popmech also wrote about this 7 years ago). They say that in the third second the rocket goes into another dimension and from there attacks a hundred times more powerful than the Tungu meteorite.
  29. mamont5 26 October 2015 18: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Fenix-15
    What kind of sawmill, however, is being prepared if they talk about the 6-e generation of fighters, when they still did not figure it out with the 5-m.

    It is in this breakthrough that the US military budget goes. Yes, even for the maintenance of military bases.
  30. Sergey-8848 26 October 2015 19: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Tested - got the result.
    We felt well done.
    This was reported to all of us and to the owners.
    What for us to know about this worthless test?
    This is a question.
    And here is the answer - it is necessary to show the exhaust, otherwise they will say that in vain we are eating dollars.
    Suddenly they won’t.
    Here is the result of all tests and messages.
  31. misterwulf 26 October 2015 19: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How scary to live! And when will the laser sword be?
  32. Aleksey_K 26 October 2015 19: 08 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The first picture shows some sort of civilian airliner in general, and it’s not possible to test a laser on this one.
    The second picture shows a solid photoshop.
    In the third picture - this is an old photo.
    Where is the laser test evidence?
  33. Mercury 26 October 2015 20: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I’ve painted my geese with mirror paint now they already have 6 generations !!! Their mattress plane with a laser does not take !!!
  34. Observer2014 26 October 2015 20: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I’ve painted my geese with mirror paint now they already have 6 generations !!! Their mattress plane with a laser does not take !!!
    Ha ha ha and the turtles in the lake near the house did not stick a mirror !?
  35. Anchonsha 26 October 2015 21: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The United States, as a driven animal, can do even more vile things in the world. In addition, this vile country has great financial opportunities, many bribed bastards work for this country, and therefore you do not need to be euphoric from our current successes
  36. Mercury 26 October 2015 21: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Turtles are also armor! All in alertness mustache painted photo I will not send. Secret for now. But the geese have two grenades on the neck
  37. Cananecat 27 October 2015 00: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the early 2000s, he read a short article in the press, where options for using combat lasers were considered. It also said that in the late 80s a stationary combat laser had already been created in the Union, which even managed to bring down a rocket during testing ... but the work with the collapse of the Union and the subsequent cessation of funding were curtailed. If then our specialists launched the Yankees in the "right" direction, then I hi I take off my hat for a worthy response to the SOI program laughing
  38. Igor Olegovich 27 October 2015 00: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In Russia, space lasers were tested under Gorbachev. Only under Yeltsin was the project stolen.
  39. Dimon19661 27 October 2015 04: 56 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Hmm .... Americans, of course, are stupid ... We are the very ones ... But it’s nothing-that Americans are intensively working out the technology of using laser weapons and already have good results, well, yes, they are stupid, and now they’ll start on new ships there are only two types of railguns and fifth-generation fighters in service. But what about almost all technologies, we are stupidly lagging behind, what’s this? Do we just have electronic industry and do we buy components mainly in China and Hong Kong? not the best examples are civilian vulnerable products. We only have technology ahead of the planet, throwing caps. You compare our military budget and the US budget, add the NATO budget, the Middle East is nearby, they also spend a lot of money, and China doesn’t And they all try to develop something new. Any test does not immediately give the desired result, but in the process a quite acceptable result gradually appears. Many also did not believe in the atomic bomb, and then they intensely caught up yali. In general, we don’t need to make idiots out of mattresses, we need to raise our own industry, then we will have the strength and resources for such tests.
  40. YaMZ-238 27 October 2015 09: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What gun is there? Which laser? Only in films is it possible for them to turn into blue avatars, godsiles walk around the city .... FANTASERS !!!
  41. Watchdog 27 October 2015 11: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    we will have rockets with a mirror coating tongue laughing tongue laughing
  42. yuriy55 27 October 2015 16: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes-ah-ah !!! Oh, these American masters "cast the guns" ...