Renovation of the nuclear shield will cost the UK $ 256 billion

40
Replacing obsolete Vangard-class submarines equipped with Trident ballistic missiles and the subsequent maintenance of a new nuclear fleet will cost the British treasury £ 167 billion ($ 256 billion) reports Look with reference to Reuters.



This was told to the agency by the head of the committee of the House of Commons on international affairs, Crispin Blunt.

"The given amount of expenses is actually an order of magnitude higher than the figures that the Tori government has so far voiced, mentioning 15-20 billion pounds," the newspaper notes.

Nevertheless, according to the United Kingdom’s Defense Ministry, “four new submarines will cost 25 billion pounds (more than $ 38 billion), and the cost of their subsequent maintenance together with rockets will be about 6% of the military’s annual budget. this year was 33,8 billion pounds ($ 52 billion). "

In the House of Commons, they calculated and concluded: “Taking into account the expected growth rates of the UK economy and its impact on the size of the country's defense budget, which should be at least 2% of the total GDP, by the end of the current program of the modernization of the nuclear potential of the United Kingdom, calculated before the end of the life of the Trident missiles in 2060, the total amount of state budget expenditures for its implementation will be 167 billion pounds. ”

The head of the Labor Party, Jeremy Corbin, a longtime participant in the struggle for nuclear disarmament, intends to firmly oppose the plans of the Cabinet to modernize the nuclear shield. He is supported by the head of the Scottish National Party, Nicola Sturgeon, who previously described the cost of these goals as "unjustified, overwhelming and immoral." And then it was still about the figures made public by the government, and not those that Blunt presented.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 October 2015 15: 31
    neither warm nor cold from this news ... that would apologize for their bad behavior in the former colonies, that's another thing
    1. +6
      26 October 2015 15: 34
      so it will be necessary to apologize to 90% of the world's population

      Not enough apology

      The Germans still cannot pay to Israel laughing although maybe already - I didn’t particularly follow

      There are still opium wars together. So there is no forgiveness for them)

      1. +4
        26 October 2015 15: 37
        Something in Russia is getting cheaper ...)))
        1. +10
          26 October 2015 16: 10
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Something in Russia is getting cheaper ...)))

          Yes, unfortunately Vitaly, a nuclear shield is a very expensive thing, but it is also not necessary for those who do not own and support it, they walk in the slaves of Washington, we have a shield at the proper level and cool a lot of hot heads. servility to Washington, as they say, did not modernize their shield at the time, hoped for an uncle and let them pay, the avaricious pays twice.
          1. +2
            26 October 2015 16: 33
            Quote: vovanpain
            a nuclear shield is a very expensive thing, but it is also very necessary, those who do not own and support it walk there in the slaves of Washington



            Um ... Naglia, France, Israel ... still list the states "independent" from the United States that have their own nuclear weapons ??? I also passed India and Pakistan ... Just don't say that they are also independent from the United States ...
            1. +1
              26 October 2015 16: 49
              What about South Africa? Or does he have nuclear weapons?
            2. mvg
              0
              26 October 2015 17: 30
              The nuclear weapons of neither India nor Pakistan are in any way connected with the United States. Pakistan helped with the finances of the SA, and with the brains of the PRC, India, supposedly, by itself .. It has been looking for American roots for a very long time.
              Israel, with what, but not deprived of brains. Moreover, in the 90's, so many stupid Russians left there (Jews with a Ryazan face) .. And, when the nuclear weapons were created, in England and France, scientists were no worse than overseas. It’s just that the states had temporary bonuses .. They did not have Comrade behind them. Hitler
          2. +2
            26 October 2015 16: 43
            Quote: vovanpain
            Quote: MIKHAN
            Something in Russia is getting cheaper ...)))

            Yes, unfortunately Vitaly, a nuclear shield is a very expensive thing, but it is also not necessary for those who do not own and support it, they walk in the slaves of Washington, we have a shield at the proper level and cool a lot of hot heads. servility to Washington, as they say, did not modernize their shield at the time, hoped for an uncle and let them pay, the avaricious pays twice.

            Avaricious pays ... I agree! Russia is not a particularly rich country, but we know what is happening in the world and how, and most importantly we understand what these people are afraid of! laughing
          3. Erg
            0
            26 October 2015 21: 43
            You, sir, are a bit confused if you think that in the US-England tandem the states rule. Yes
        2. +1
          26 October 2015 18: 13
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Something in Russia is getting cheaper ...)))

          The fact that they plan there and what will actually be two very big differences, like numbers. In addition, England has always loved to rattle with weapons. But now this is a rattling considering our Caliber, X-101 and everything else , as it is not convincing and gray.
      2. +2
        26 October 2015 16: 31
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        The Germans still cannot pay to Israel



        It always killed me and continues to kill on the spot ...

        How much they put our people, what devastation brought us - and - nothing ...

        But Israel wasn’t even mentioned when the Second World War was going on ... And look, they are still paying indemnities to them ...

        Well, just like the French: damn it, the winners over Germany ...

        In general, in the world a lot of surreal events occur that are not understandable ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      26 October 2015 15: 39
      DIRECTLY BALM ON THE SOUL ... more expenses of any and all .... it is necessary to pay for phobias !!!
    4. +1
      26 October 2015 15: 45
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      would apologize for their bad behavior in the former colonies

      A pig promised not to go to the garden ..... and the cat in slippers laughing and Great Britain is all over the world.
      Well, defense industry, I’m an expensive business.
    5. 0
      26 October 2015 16: 04
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      neither warm nor cold from this news ... that would apologize for their bad behavior in the former colonies, that's another thing

      -------------
      Why? I am so very warm ... The English fleet 35 years ago was rubbish, back in the days of the war over the Falklands, and now it is expensive rubbish, eaten by moth and rust ... Let it contain this junk from the Cold War ...
      1. mvg
        0
        26 October 2015 17: 36
        And, after America, which fleet, in your opinion, claims to be the second or third place? And what other fleet would win in the Falkland Islands? Without near bases. Without normal aviation. For distant lands from England, and a step away from Argentina? What are you talking about?
  2. WKS
    +4
    26 October 2015 15: 32
    Renovation of the nuclear shield will cost the UK $ 256 billion

    From whom is Great Britain going to hide behind this shield? From argentina?
    1. +3
      26 October 2015 15: 53
      Quote: wks
      From whom is Great Britain going to hide behind this shield? From argentina?

      Maybe he wants to regain the title of world hegemon? So the states will not give.
      As usual, he wants to rob and sow troubles around the world with impunity, hiding behind a nuclear shield.
    2. 0
      26 October 2015 16: 40
      Quote: wks
      From whom is Great Britain going to hide behind this shield? From argentina?



      From the influx of aggressive migrant Arabs ... laughing

      PS By the way, it’s already too late ... Better this money feed these migrants so that they do not rob everyone there, do not kill them from hunger ...
  3. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 33
    This news should be viewed in the context of the changes that are noticeable today not only in the leadership of England, but also in Canada, Australia, and, in the future, in France. Politicians come to power who are gradually beginning to distance themselves from Washington and cut back money for Star Wars. Good, positive news.
    1. +4
      26 October 2015 15: 56
      Good, good news.

      What good and positive Trident ICBMs will they buy from the Yankees,
      and with the money our oligarchs fled tolu fired.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      26 October 2015 16: 08
      Quote: Stiletto
      Politicians come to power who are gradually beginning to distance themselves from Washington and cut back money for Star Wars. Good, positive news.

      Nuclear weapons will not help against the blow of Islamists from within and American "liberal universal values".
  4. +5
    26 October 2015 15: 35
    From Iran and North Korea, you can’t not renew for another 50 years, but from Russia it’s a monkey! Britain was engaged and continues to be engaged in all sorts of nonsense, the country half already left in the Middle Ages.
    1. mvg
      -1
      26 October 2015 17: 40
      So "went to the Middle Ages" that our oligarchs only go there and go for permanent residence ... And in London, the most expensive housing ... by the way. Probably good football there .. here they go .. and the climate is cool: sea, sun, sand .. knights ..
      What kind of amateurs are all "crap" ..
  5. +2
    26 October 2015 15: 41
    to the end of the current United Kingdom nuclear modernization program, calculated until the end of the life of the Trident missiles in 2060
    Is there an error here? How will this old iron look like 60 for the year and will it fly?
    1. mvg
      -2
      26 October 2015 17: 52
      Do you know missiles better than Trident? Like this, in all honesty, or with your head on the Internet? Range, accuracy (KVO <500 m), throw weight .. weight and dimensions? 10-14 separable warheads .. Maybe the Chinese, or the French, or the Indians have such. And the Brita ships have always been able to do better than many .. And their aircraft carriers (Queen Elizabeth) and destroyers (Daring) and submarines (Astyut) are possibly the best in the world ..
      And new Tridents can be made .. By the way, do we have many new missiles? How many times have we extended the terms for the Governors and Satans? Or the blue of the sea? How many Maces will hit the target from a volley? Take 1 !!! a rocket, they lick it for a year, prepare it for GI, and it flies for about 30 seconds .. after which it gets tired ..
      The Brita, of course, are "kazly", but underestimating the enemy is fraught with danger.
      1. Erg
        0
        26 October 2015 21: 50
        And I didn’t think about several hundred missiles with anthrax and hydrocyanic acid (and this is at best). Turn off kindergarten and start thinking. If there is a batch - who will be interested in "agreements". Under the guise of a "threat" of nuclear weapons, a much more effective weapon is being created. The parties to the conflict will have little chance ...
  6. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 46
    maintenance of a new nuclear fleet will cost the British treasury £ 167 billion ($ 256 billion)
    Give Ukrainians 3 billion that they would pay with Russia. laughing And about your defense, we, i.e. Russia will take care of the full program laughing
  7. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 47
    The British would gladly become great again, but they will not allow sins. Attempts - in the light of a well-fed European existence - are not feasible. They will not tighten their belts for the sake of nuclear rearmament.
  8. +3
    26 October 2015 15: 48
    supported by the leader of the Scottish National Party, Nicola Sturgeon, who previously called spending for this purpose “unjustified, unreasonable and immoral”

    After long personal communication with the Scots and the British, from my experience, I came to the conviction (and not only me) that these two nations are absolutely opposite in their mentality. After additional study of this issue, it turned out that the ancestors of the Scotch and other Rusichs have the same roots. A version appeared that this term in the dialect corresponds to our "Scythian", there are multiple proofs of this. This is where the similarity of mentality seems to arise.
    1. +2
      26 October 2015 16: 06
      Quote: venaya
      After a long personal dialogue with the Scots and the British, from my own experience, I came to the conclusion (and not just me) that these two nations are absolutely opposite in their mentality.

      ------------------
      Many military victories of Great Britain belong to hereditary Scots ...
  9. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 51
    it is with 4 submarines such costs and we will have more of them how much it will be interesting to manage
    1. 0
      26 October 2015 16: 29
      It will cost us trillions of 70 rubles until 2060.
  10. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 51
    The head of the Labor Party, Jeremy Corbin, a longtime participant in the fight for nuclear disarmament, intends to firmly oppose the Cabinet’s plans to modernize the nuclear shield.

    Stability is a sign of mastery.

    There is no more terrible enemy for the army, air force and fleet of His / Her Majesty than the Labor Party (especially the ruling). On their combat account there is even one nuclear carrier. smile
    1. 0
      26 October 2015 16: 53
      So the Scots must be attracted, their struggle for independence and the desire to part with the British Navy.
  11. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 52
    Local taxpayers will be "happy".
  12. +3
    26 October 2015 15: 54
    Like a dead poultice. While they are upgrading, the wave will wash them away a hundred times. Such things need to be done right away - to speak out in front of the whole country and say so and so they have lagged behind the "Soviets" there is nowhere else - the good life of the Khan is now, now all the loot is for the defense industry, but what's the point, slowly, hoping for a Russian maybe, live and pour 2% into this project, so you may not live until the planned 2060
  13. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 56
    It would be nice if the British abandoned their nuclear arsenal and disarm. Moreover, there is a peaceful example of nuclear disarmament - this is Ukraine. Let the Ukrainians take an example - they utilized nuclear weapons, and the funds allocated for its maintenance can be used for other purposes. Where you can send money - as they say, options are possible.
  14. +1
    26 October 2015 15: 57
    A Northwind class SSBN costs 713 million dollars. (the first ship, now the price is higher), and the Angichans will build only 38 for 4 billion, what kind of boats are there?
    1. +3
      26 October 2015 16: 03
      And there think less lovers think? True, the length of the leash is clearly defined for each bureaucrat, but for centuries, established chains are expensive.
    2. mvg
      0
      26 October 2015 17: 57
      Where have you "dug up" such figures? And the cost of the missiles, and the "maintenance" during the operation period, and the feeding of the crew .. and a couple of missiles must be "fired" for testing .. And then, Borey more (naked) should cost .. even in rubles .. and ours ZP ..
  15. +2
    26 October 2015 16: 00
    A couple of good fusion and there is no point in clearing human islet in the Atlantic from human rot ...
    Water itself will wash away everything ....
  16. 0
    26 October 2015 16: 24
    The arms race ... It has begun. Brace yourself, liberals, tanning won't help. From "this country" only to blame you or, together with the people, get on a military track. Although where to go now? Get out in GB and life is "not sugar", and in Germany, and in ... And where is it good? Everywhere you have to work, for free only on benefits in the EU to Frau Chancellor. Isn't it better to do good deeds in Russia?
  17. 0
    26 October 2015 16: 45
    As soon as Russia re-equipped a little and that's it, they sailed. It turned out that almost all countries have "world leaders" and have nothing to actually answer to what we have. Well done ours, their budgets will go down great.
    All of them have one concern and concern. And these diseases are treated very expensively, but they say that vaccines weren’t invented from this disaster either. wink
  18. 0
    26 October 2015 18: 01
    Serbian Prime Minister: weapons are one of the main topics of the upcoming talks in Moscow
    According to the portal RuSerbia.ru, Serbian Prime Minister Alexander Vučić, during a press conference before leaving for Moscow, emphasized that Serbia will always have a sufficient number of different types of weapons so that no one would try to attack this country.

    He also noted that the Serbian government is carefully working on the issue related to weapons, and this will be one of the main topics in the negotiations in Moscow.

    The Prime Minister of Serbia noted that representatives of the Serbian government are very closely following the actions of neighboring countries and will not allow any violations by the armies of other countries in the Balkan region. Answering a question about whether Russian arms will be procured, the Prime Minister of Serbia said that the Serbian government is primarily trying to develop the Serbian economy and wants arms production for the Serbian army to be carried out in Serbia.

    However, the Serbian politician explained that when creating the Nora self-propelled howitzers, the developers use the chassis of the Russian Kamaz. This is done for the reason that the Kamaz chassis can withstand more than thirty-five tons. According to Vucic, this is an occasion to discuss this with the Russian side. According to the prime minister, another reason is the 30mm 2A42 gun, which Serbian engineers put on the Lazar armored personnel carrier.

    Alexander Vučić also said that representatives of the Ministry of Defense of Serbia had already ordered transport helicopters, but would have to reflect on the acquisition of combat helicopters. "Sioux combat helicopters of the Kiowa have already been delivered to some neighboring countries," says Vučić.

    - We also need to think about acquiring ballistic missiles. We never want to fight with anyone, but we must be fully prepared and aware that Serbia has this kind of weaponry as an answer to those countries that think that Serbia is easy prey.
    http://warfiles.ru/show-98492-premer-serbii-oruzhie-eto-odna-iz-glavnyh-tem-grya
    duschih-peregovorov-v-moskve.html
  19. 0
    27 October 2015 09: 52
    Quote: Amurets
    What about South Africa? Or does he have nuclear weapons?

    All your SIX nuclear bombs they dismantled xz when