Military Review

Who benefits nuclear jihad pictures?

40
Some Western experts believe that the emergence of the "Islamic State" chemical or nuclear weapons - It's a question of time. A kilo of highly enriched uranium is worth in the entire market 26 million pounds. In addition, the militants "IG" do not hide their desire to attract specialists in the development of chemical and nuclear weapons.


Who benefits nuclear jihad pictures?


The other day in the British newspaper "Express" Marco Giannangeli's exclusive material has appeared, containing the statements of the former commander of the nuclear division of the British army. This person believes that the "IG" "inevitably" will receive weapons of mass destruction. And the risk of getting a homemade atomic bomb and its explosion in any city “increased significantly” because of the “tense relations” of the Islamists with Russia.

Dr. Hamish de Bretton-Gordon (Hamish de Bretton-Gordon) said that the jihadists from the IG already have chemical weapons (mustard gas), and it’s only a matter of time when they launch a gas attack that can be destroyed much of the city.

Bretton-Gordon had previously commanded a chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense regiment in Britain. He gave his warnings at the Global Resilience conference in London.

He recalled that the terrorists from the "IG" openly declare their desire to get weapons of mass destruction.

They themselves can make weapons of mass destruction from uranium-enriched uranium, using the reserves seized in Mosul (Iraq). To do this, they want to attract scientists to develop chemical and nuclear weapons. However, highly enriched uranium can be simply bought: one kilogram of it costs only 26 million pounds.

Where did the terrorists hit, making a bomb?

Dr. Bretton-Gordon believes that cities in Iraq, as well as Moscow (Iraq and Moscow), will be at risk. They are "extremely vulnerable." But the UK is in relative safety, since its intelligence services are "highly qualified."

As for Russia, it recently launched an operation against "opposition groups" and "IG" in Syria, and this has led to the discontent of terrorists. Dr. Bretton-Gordon also believes that, despite the “bragging of Vladimir Putin,” Russia is by no means effective “militarily.”

The expert considers Moscow to be a “target for extremists”, and the activity of the Russian special services is extremely low.

Great Britain is a different matter. Prime Minister David Cameron is listening to the warnings of experts and has already announced the allocation of £ 5 million to a new strategy to combat extremism and extremist ideology in society.

Assumptions that the terrorists "IG" is about to acquire a nuclear bomb, have been published in the press before.

Recall that in May 2015, materials appeared in the media with links to the Islamist propaganda newspaper Dabiq, which “reported” that the “Islamic state” could gain access to nuclear weapons “during the year.” The material was signed by a captive British journalist, John Cantley (extremists often use it to write articles or sound videos).

How to write a resource Newsru.com, Cantley indicated that his forecast is still "illusory", but stressed that the probability of obtaining nuclear weapons "IG" over the past year has increased significantly.

Kantli was commented on by the Indian edition of One India. Analysts have suggested that the "IG" will be able to buy a nuclear bomb in Pakistan.

Another newspaper, the British “Independent,” said: “In the bank accounts of IG, billions of dollars ...” And the organization “can spend this money through its allies in Pakistan to buy a nuclear bomb.”

Cantley, on the other hand, pointed out that Islamists have connections “amongst arms dealers, as well as corrupt officials.”

As for the possible direction of attacks on Russia, in recent days, the IG banned here has launched a whole campaign in Russian. True, we are not talking about a nuclear bomb. But the militants are calling for "jihad."

In a large article Monitoring Services "BBC" called propaganda goals and objectives of the militants "IG".

The grouping "Islamic state", the article notes, is increasing its propaganda activity in Russian. The main audience of propaganda is the population of the North Caucasus, a region that the IG leadership declared its “province” in June. In addition, jihadists seek to influence the inhabitants of the countries of Central Asia.

Since the proclamation of the “Caucasian province”, the militants of the “IG”, banned in Russia, are calling on the Muslims of the North Caucasus not to go to the Middle East, but to conduct jihad against Russia.

In the two videos mentioned by the BBC and filmed by North Caucasian militants in Syria and in the forests of the Caucasus, there are calls for North Caucasian Muslim men not to go to Syria and Iraq themselves, but to send wives and children there (under the protection of the “caliphate” ). In the rollers there are threats against Russian law enforcement agencies.

The IG leadership also appealed to the residents of Azerbaijan to take part in jihad.

A week earlier the same "BBC" placed the material under the screaming headline "Islamic State" calls for the conduct of jihad against Russia. "

This title, as we see it, hints that the West would not mind if the IG came together in a war with the Russians. The West would probably be glad. In fact, the article is not only about Russia. Moreover, a representative of an extremist group, whose opinion was voiced by the BBC, called the United States the main target. But the British TV and Radio Company could not put the United States in the title!

As stated in the text of the note, the representative of IG, Mahammad Adnani, in the 40-minute statement, whose audio recording appeared on the Internet, called on Muslims from all over the world to join the jihad against Russians and Americans.

The message focuses not on Russia, but on the United States. Quote:

“Adnani named the United States as the main target and added that this country seeks to enlist the support of Australia, Turkey, Russia, Iran. Americans, he said, feel their weakness, while the "IG" is becoming stronger with each passing day. He foretold the inevitable collapse of the United States. ”


We will add in conclusion that the attention of the West (especially Britain) to Russia is mainly due to the desire of the opponents of Moscow to turn the army of jihadists to the North Caucasus, and even to Moscow. Hence the strange predictions of Dr. Bretton-Gordon, who is confident in the coming nuclear strike on Moscow, and the tendentious headlines on the BBC. According to its old bad habit, the West, as in the days of Afghanistan in the 1980-s, turns the forces of terrorists towards the "commies".

I must say, for such propaganda, London chose the most appropriate time: the militants are angry with effective Russian airstrikes.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ewgen
    ewgen 27 October 2015 06: 25 New
    11
    As stated in the text of the note, the representative of IG, Mahammad Adnani, in the 40-minute statement, whose audio recording appeared on the Internet, called on Muslims from all over the world to join the jihad against Russians and Americans.

    ISIS versus the US, bees versus honey. Who will supply them?
    1. Letun
      Letun 27 October 2015 07: 18 New
      +3
      Quote: ewgen
      ISIS versus the US, bees versus honey. Who will supply them?

      So what they wrote to him in Washington, then he read it. Like, naive Europeans and Americans continued to think that their leaders are fighting terrorism, not creating it.
      1. yushch
        yushch 27 October 2015 12: 06 New
        +7
        The article says about billions of dollars of IG in bank accounts. Fucking shame, they themselves do not break the pattern ??? After all, it is the banks that control the United States, British and their vassals, so why is this money still not arrested and seized?
        This is direct evidence of why shaved shavens and mattresses are not afraid of terrorist attacks at home, because the IS money is under their control and the explosions will be where they say "the owners."
  2. R-140
    R-140 27 October 2015 06: 33 New
    +2
    Delusional article.
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 27 October 2015 10: 14 New
      +3
      As well as everything that comes out of the "pen" of Western hacks. Roughly similar to "British scientists".
    2. antoXa
      antoXa 27 October 2015 11: 52 New
      +2
      Today I’ve already read a bunch of articles with the opinions of Western journalists, generals, experts and all sorts of different ...
      I read them and it feels like they’re all playing in some American movie, even the pictures from the films begin to flicker in my eyes, the feeling is that the same scriptwriters are writing their speeches and thoughts, in short a sheer nonsense practically, at least a little honest assessment.
  3. PlotnikoffDD
    PlotnikoffDD 27 October 2015 06: 42 New
    +3
    But the UK is in relative safety, because its intelligence services are "highly qualified."

    Well, as always, Russian-blue-legged barbarians.
    1. Russian Uzbek
      Russian Uzbek 27 October 2015 07: 37 New
      +5
      there’s a surprise when it’s somewhere in the area of ​​Pel-Mel or Chelsea ...
      1. A-Sim
        A-Sim 27 October 2015 10: 22 New
        +4
        How can this happen ???? After all, it is written:

        "Prime Minister David Cameron is listening to the warnings of experts and has already announced the allocation of £ 5 million for a new strategy to combat extremism and extremist ideology in society."

        So this cannot be ....
  4. Bongo
    Bongo 27 October 2015 06: 47 New
    10
    Dr. Hamish de Bretton-Gordon (Hamish de Bretton-Gordon) said that the jihadists from the IG already have chemical weapons (mustard gas), and it’s only a matter of time when they launch a gas attack that can be destroyed much of the city.

    How does the author imagine this? For the effective use of mustard gas ("mustard gas"), very significant volumes of this agent are required, aviation pouring devices (VAPs) and military aviation. Of course, the Caliphate has all this. No.
    Or more:
    They themselves can make WMD from unenriched uranium, using the reserves seized in Mosul (Iraq)
    Is the author familiar with uranium enrichment technology and the construction of a simple nuclear charge? negative All this "on the knee" can not be done.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 October 2015 12: 14 New
      +2
      Quote: Bongo
      the design of the simplest nuclear charge? negative All this "on the knee" can not be done.

      well, you don’t have to do a lot of mind with a dirty bomb ... from the same Chernobyl, drag rods from the reactor, especially since the PSeks themselves will deliver, the main thing is against the damned ...
  5. Concealer
    Concealer 27 October 2015 06: 47 New
    +6
    The article is certainly delusional, but they seem to be given nuclear weapons. Many "partners" really want to start a third world war.
  6. lexx2038
    lexx2038 27 October 2015 07: 39 New
    +4
    It seems that the Anglo-Saxons are hinting to the militants that they could contribute to obtaining any kind of nuclear mine, if the terrorists are right - where it is used.
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 27 October 2015 07: 41 New
    +3
    Some Western experts are convinced that the appearance of the “Islamic State” of chemical or nuclear weapons is a matter of time. ..I agree that if Western countries provide ISIS with these weapons .. And the West will not give ISIS weapons of mass destruction, it will never be ...
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 27 October 2015 08: 25 New
    +4
    Well, what is quite real.
    And what is the grebes, everyone will immediately begin to justify the IG.
    Like this is a struggle, resistance.
    And the Russians should be deposed Putin and surrender to democratic values,
    then they can avoid further attacks.
    Only now I think that if this happens,
    then a couple of states in the Middle East will become smaller.
    In overseeing, so to speak ...
  9. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 27 October 2015 08: 34 New
    +5
    I also agree that only Western "friends" can supply extremists with nuclear weapons, and if they do not supply them, they will never have them. It is impossible to make a nuclear bomb in a "garage", various "horror stories" that are circulating on the Internet about this are nothing more than "ducks", often planted by the special services themselves. I am only worried about the fate of about a dozen sabotage nuclear devices that "disappeared" in Ukraine during the return of its nuclear arsenal to Russia. Here they are, modernized, can "surface" in unexpected places.
    1. Concealer
      Concealer 27 October 2015 08: 43 New
      +1
      In vain worry. Israel has already built them correctly.
  10. Uzzy
    Uzzy 27 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +3
    Well, of course, the United States is in the spotlight ... Well, its faithful poodle London is already enraging. This bacchanalia around the world will not stop until Britain and the USA are first wiped off the face of the earth. Straight anger makes its way
  11. cniza
    cniza 27 October 2015 09: 14 New
    +4
    They themselves will supply and they themselves will suffer, and then along Lavrov ... ...
  12. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 09: 18 New
    +3
    Quote: R-140
    Delusional article.

    The article is by no means delusional. She shows how the west sees it. Or if they see it differently - is it just nonsense?

    And, of course, there are risks of receiving weapons of mass destruction from all terrorist organizations. Let not a full-fledged nuclear bomb, but a "dirty" radiological one, not to mention a chemical one - that's no problem ...

    Quote: parusnik
    Some Western experts are convinced that the appearance of the “Islamic State” of chemical or nuclear weapons is a matter of time. ..I agree that if Western countries provide ISIS with these weapons .. And the West will not give ISIS weapons of mass destruction, it will never be ...

    It will be elementary. Especially chemical. A by-product of petrochemistry is some of the OM, EMNIP, then phosgene or similar substances can be used as petrochemical waste. Nuclear weapons are something else. What to mean by nuclear weapons. If the classic ammunition, but ISIS will not have them in the near future. And to give them to someone - in 1 it is stupid, in 2 it is not so easy. But a "dirty" bomb, which can be attributed to a radiological weapon, and some also refer to a nuclear one, can be obtained, especially since they received a large amount of radioactive materials in Iraq. And a "classic" bomb can be made from low-enriched uranium. The critical mass will be huge, but technically possible ...

    Quote: Monster_Fat
    I am only worried about the fate of about a dozen sabotage nuclear devices that "disappeared" in Ukraine during the return of its nuclear arsenal to Russia. Here they are, modernized, can "surface" in unexpected places.

    They have long been inoperative, if at all this rumor (about missing) is not an ordinary duck
  13. 0255
    0255 27 October 2015 09: 24 New
    +1
    Nuclear weapons in the hands of Islamists are just American horror stories for US citizens + a standard plot for computer games and films. There was a time when we were afraid that al-Qaeda would have nuclear weapons. Even in some old issue of Komsomolskaya Pravda, they wrote that the US accused Saddam Hussein of ... selling nuclear weapons to Bin Laden.
    Do patients on the head of the Islamists have aviation capable of carrying nuclear weapons? Have rocket launchers?
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 October 2015 12: 18 New
      +2
      Quote: 0255
      Do patients on the head of the Islamists have aviation capable of carrying nuclear weapons? Have rocket launchers?

      hijacked civilian airliner - why are you not a carrier?
    2. mark2
      mark2 27 October 2015 18: 47 New
      +1
      They will deliver it on donkeys. Ishaki strategic purpose))
  14. sucre
    sucre 27 October 2015 09: 24 New
    +2
    If it is not possible to capture Syria and make a ring around Russia, and this, as we see, does not work, then when leaving the Middle East the Yankees use the last trump card. They have nuclear weapons bombs in one of the depots in Europe. Here is one of them will accidentally or not accidentally explode. Vanga said - Syria has not fallen yet, but the winner will be different. Not that winner is Russia - and the war for Syria is still ongoing. And she also said that it would be cold - an empty Europe. Somewhere it’s sinking! crying
  15. kori
    kori 27 October 2015 09: 39 New
    +1
    Nuclear jihad .. strike on Moscow, Washington with nuclear weapons .. what kind of delirium of inflamed consciousness? Do they have delivery vehicles? On your hump a couple of kilos of plutonium, uranium or something else, you can't carry. You will shine like a New Year tree, and you won't be able to discard your skates for long. Hence "airmail", and where did they get it from? And whether it will fly .. Stupid.
  16. Fearless
    Fearless 27 October 2015 10: 00 New
    0
    the Americans themselves created the IS so that the mujahideen would not break into America and carry out terrorist attacks there, that’s why the Americans are watching there, and since the Russian Air Force strikes, they have nowhere to run and the Americans started to fuss. Now the Americans are starting to boil up and offer them chemical or nuclear weapons. Allegedly the struggle against themselves, and the IG is just an army of Norkamans and stupid people who Americans confused their brains. the Americans themselves never knew how to fight as worthy rivals; they act through intermediaries like we will help you, like we will give you money, like we will give you citizenship.
  17. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 10: 03 New
    0
    Quote: 0255
    Do patients on the head of the Islamists have aviation capable of carrying nuclear weapons? Have rocket launchers?

    I do not really like to refer to T. Clancy, although he writes quite well (not all books are true, but nonetheless).
    In one of his novels, EMNIP "All the fears of the world," the terrorists made everything quite simple. Delivered by sea in the form of a container with an automatic machine for selling something. And that's all. No missiles or aircraft. A purely terrorist act involving nuclear weapons. Therefore, the presence or absence of missiles and aircraft is not a criterion

    Quote: sucre
    If it is not possible to capture Syria and make a ring around Russia, and this, as we see, does not work, then when leaving the Middle East the Yankees use the last trump card. They have nuclear weapons bombs in one of the depots in Europe. Here is one of them will accidentally or not accidentally explode. Vanga said - Syria has not fallen yet, but the winner will be different. Not that winner is Russia - and the war for Syria is still ongoing. And she also said that it would be cold - an empty Europe. Somewhere it’s sinking! crying

    The Americans have nuclear bombs not in one of the depots, but in several. And stop raving that one of them will explode or not. Apparently, you perfectly know the structure of nuclear weapons, if you write like that ... Well, Wang - how could you do without it. Now referring to what she was saying is a sign of good form. This has not been published anywhere, no one knows what exactly she said, but as if a little something - they immediately recall Wang
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 27 October 2015 10: 10 New
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      In one of his novels, EMNIP "All the fears of the world," the terrorists made everything quite simple. Delivered by sea in the form of a container with an automatic machine for selling something. And that's all. No missiles or aircraft. A purely terrorist act involving nuclear weapons.

      Only you forgot to mention how the terrorists got nuclear weapons in the novel. And is it even worth mentioning "fantasy" at all? Although I personally read many of Clancy's novels with pleasure, even considering that they are too ideologized.
      1. Mwg
        Mwg 28 October 2015 07: 37 New
        0
        Fiction is a simulation of probabilities. But in theory, anything is possible. Therefore, science fiction should be taken into account.
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 October 2015 12: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      I do not really like to refer to T. Clancy, although he writes quite well

      wrote ... crying Died October 1, 2013 in Baltimore, Maryland.
    3. mark2
      mark2 27 October 2015 18: 49 New
      0
      The more dead the predictor, the more eyewitnesses of what he predicted))
  18. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 10: 30 New
    0
    Quote: Bongo
    Only you forgot to mention how the terrorists got nuclear weapons in the novel. And is it even worth mentioning "fantasy" at all? Although I personally read many of Clancy's novels with pleasure, even considering that they are too ideologized.

    Sergei! I have this to the question of delivery vehicles. After all, a rhetorical question was asked, but how? They don’t have rockets or planes.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 27 October 2015 10: 36 New
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      Sergei! I have this to the question of delivery vehicles. After all, a rhetorical question was asked, but how? They don’t have rockets or planes.

      Vladimir, the novel describes a very small-sized plutonium charge of an implosive type. I very much doubt that at the moment any terrorist group is capable of making an explosive device even on the basis of Uranus-235.
      1. Mwg
        Mwg 28 October 2015 07: 40 New
        0
        Bongo, why "make an explosive device"? Everyone came to the conclusion that they only need to deliver, and others will do it.
    2. mark2
      mark2 27 October 2015 18: 51 New
      0
      And one more question, who will sell IG at least one kilogram of enriched uranium. It’s worth it, but where to buy? If everything was so simple, then it was sold on the market as simple iron. For some reason, Iraq could not buy it, began to build centrifuges ...
  19. knn54
    knn54 27 October 2015 10: 31 New
    +1
    As a script for Hollywood, it’s all right.
  20. alexander1
    alexander1 27 October 2015 11: 35 New
    0
    And here it would be good if the retired FSB general, at some international forum, answered the professor from MI6 that after any attempt even to approach the state with a self-made nuclear device. On the borders of the Russian Federation, the FSB will immediately, unexpectedly, have accurate operational information about dozens of groups of bearded Chechen "Wahhabis" who have hidden a dozen nuclear devices in the Buckingen Palace area and throughout Britain, which the FSB will certainly not be able to stop undermining!)) )))
    As I understand it, they have already been explained to them about the Stingers in Syria, how many LIH and ARROWs the Taliban can have in Afghanistan, if that! And there, the Allied aircraft in the mountains are very vulnerable. And without aviation, supplying the army in Afghanistan is practically impossible!
    In general, they have not yet answered us for Afghanistan! After all, you can open an auction of unprecedented generosity on the border with Tajikistan, with the free distribution of the means of struggle against democracy to the Taliban! And then for 15 thousand of our boys the Anglo-Saxons have not yet answered us!
  21. Technologist
    Technologist 27 October 2015 12: 42 New
    0
    Well, they are unlikely to be allowed into the North Caucasus, I think Kadyrov Jr. doesn’t really need it.
  22. Alexart
    Alexart 27 October 2015 14: 22 New
    +1
    Englishwoman craps again.

    ***

    “Good old England ... May Syphilis strike you, old Syka!”
    - English prose writer Richard Aldington

    ***
  23. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 18: 13 New
    0
    Quote: Bongo
    Vladimir, the novel describes a very small-sized plutonium charge of an implosive type. I very much doubt that at the moment any terrorist group is capable of making an explosive device even on the basis of Uranus-235.

    I remember. But no one can deny the use of such a delivery option. Let not a "vending machine", but the same 20-foot container - what is not a storage for YaBZ
  24. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 18: 16 New
    0
    Quote: knn54
    As a script for Hollywood, it’s all right.

    And not for Hollywood, but for reality?
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. mark2
    mark2 27 October 2015 19: 14 New
    0
    All is well, gentlemen! Here we are sitting here, comfortably sitting in comfortable chairs at home or in offices, writing all sorts of cool comments, joking, arguing, pretending to be experts (maybe someone is), but we forget that the World is different. That you can get a chemical weapon without buying it, that you can assemble an atomic bomb in the garage, in principle, that the World suddenly, everything suddenly became close and close.
    I am not an alarmist and have never been. But if you think about it, what if? Suddenly, the IS terrorists will nevertheless obtain or assemble the simplest nuclear device, all the more it is not difficult, except to find materials for it and blow it up In Moscow or in another city in Russia, where can we get, what will we do? How to escape. Those who die in the explosion will be lucky. The rest, who was struck by radiation, what to do? What medicines, where to get them? How to apply?
    At one time I was interested in this issue. I went to pharmacies asking about the stocks of such medicines. They are not in stocks. And it never was. Even as a strategic reserve, in case of a nuclear attack.
    And how many of us have respirators at home, I'm not talking about gas masks.
    I remember in my youth, in the 90s, when there was a tear and sloppiness, climbing warehouses with ammunition (there simply were holes in the walls) we came across such small orange first-aid kits with some kind of plastic little bags. And they have pills. We were interested only in these little balls themselves, because we made firecrackers on their basis. The tablets were thrown away. And as it later turned out that in such first-aid kits, preparations from chemical, biological and radiation damage were stored.
    Later I found such first-aid kits on sale but on the Internet. In pharmacy warehouses and in pharmacies themselves there is nothing like this.
    Bravado and heroism are certainly good. But if the hero dies from radiation, who will revenge the enemy A?
  27. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 21: 12 New
    0
    You are right, Alexander. Now much of what used to be under seven seals has become available to many. This is the "minus" of knowledge (and the Internet in particular). The same Phosgene is formed by the oxidation of chloroform by atmospheric oxygen under the action of light. And also by heating CO with Cl2 in the presence of coal. So you're right in saying

    Quote: mark2
    What to get a chemical weapon without buying it

    There will be enough victims to sow panic.

    Quote: mark2
    you can assemble an atomic bomb in the garage, in principle


    Of course, making an atomic bomb in the garage (on your knee) will not work, but a "dirty", radiological bomb - yes, it is possible. And terrorists most often have no shortage of money, sponsors will always be found.

    Quote: mark2
    Suddenly, ISIS terrorists will nevertheless obtain or assemble a simple nuclear device, all the more it is not difficult, except to find materials for it

    Will they get it? Pretty complicated now. At the time of the collapse of the Union, in that state of chaos, the theoretical may have been, HZ. In the modern world, the main problem is to get exactly the material. The reactor is not suitable, you need material from production, but not many countries can create weapons-grade materials. And others are of little use. for example, uranium 20% enrichment, the one that Iran produced could be suitable, but the critical mass would be about 600 or 800 kg. Agree, you need a lot of material, but you can’t get it ....

    Quote: mark2
    At one time I was interested in this issue. I went to pharmacies asking about the stocks of such medicines. They are not in stocks. And it never was. Even as a strategic reserve, in case of a nuclear attack.

    They were in vain interested. The probability is zero. At one time I was the head of the emergency fire department in my organization as part of the Ministry of Emergencies. He underwent retraining from time to time and many such questions were raised there. The answer was always negative. Now you can buy a dosimeter, but what will it give if there are no protective equipment

    Quote: mark2
    And how many of us have respirators at home, I'm not talking about gas masks.

    One gas mask, and 4 or 5 respirators (all this for four people). Well, and some other ways in case of emergency.


    Quote: mark2
    And how many of us have respirators at home, I'm not talking about gas masks. I remember in my youth, in the 90s, when there was a tear and sloppiness, climbing warehouses with ammunition (there simply were holes in the walls) we came across such small orange first-aid kits with some kind of plastic little bags. And they have pills. We were interested only in these little balls themselves, because we made firecrackers on their basis. The tablets were thrown away. And as it later turned out that in such first-aid kits, preparations from chemical, biological and radiation damage were stored.

    Young were stupid
  28. Don.Bass
    Don.Bass 27 October 2015 21: 30 New
    0
    Yes, no one will give them any nuclear bomb. It will be more expensive. Can you imagine a monkey with a grenade? But they can provide them with shells with a nuclear charge.
  29. Old26
    Old26 27 October 2015 21: 47 New
    0
    Quote: Don.Bass
    Yes, no one will give them any nuclear bomb. It will be more expensive. Can you imagine a monkey with a grenade? But they can provide them with shells with a nuclear charge.

    Logic is not visible. That is, nobody will give them a bomb, but will give shells ???