Glazyev offers recovery

Main economic news of the week - another surge of discussions and disputes around Sergei Glazyev’s proposals, voiced during the meeting of the Stolypin Club (Business Russia expert platform).


Glazyev offers recovery


Let me remind you, not so long ago, the presidential aide suggested a number of measures that would allow the exhausted Russian economy to grow at a rate of 10% per year.

Among them is the introduction of partial currency control (which should reduce the huge outflow of capital from the country), a stimulating monetary policy (Glazyev proposes to print at least 1,5 trillion rubles a year for five years, in order to remove credit hunger from enterprises), finally, a number of steps to avoiding commodity dependence (tax breaks for small and medium businesses, raising export duties on raw materials, etc.).

The report was co-authored by the Presidential Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs Boris Titov and the former Deputy Minister of Economic Development Andrei Klepach.

And this means that the ideas of Glazyev are increasingly conquering the minds of economic experts and it is already becoming more difficult to dismiss them, declaring Glazyev to be a freak of the economy. Although such attempts to brand the academic continue to be undertaken by the liberals. What do they impute to him "guilt"?

"Printing money will lead to a surge in inflation."


This, of course, is an amazing argument. And non-printing of money will not lead? What did we then see at the end of the past - the beginning of the current year?

The rapid rise in prices for imported goods, which have risen in price because of a sharp (two-fold) devaluation of the ruble. And who made this devaluation? Is it the Central Bank of Russia, which in December pointedly left the foreign exchange market, giving it to the plundering of speculators?

In addition, we should not forget that in Russia inflation is non-monetary in nature. The rise in prices correlates with the money supply, God forbid, by a third, the rest - the tariffs of natural monopolies, which are already controlled by the state (judging by the Glazyev report, it can do better).

In science there is such a thing - the monetization of the economy. This is the amount of money in the system by which the population and the enterprises pay each other. How much money relative to GDP should be in the economy (the rate of turnover of funds still plays a role) - there is no single answer. However, you can see the average of the world.

So, on average in the world, the monetization ratio is 125%. There is not a single developed country where the ratio of money to GDP would be less than 90%. In China - 195%. In Japan and the Netherlands - almost 250%.

In the USA and Sweden - slightly less than 100%. In Russia ... 47%, that is, two times lower than it should be. This is the level of Paraguay, Papua New Guinea and the Republic of Niger. Glazyev proposes to get away from the level of African countries by printing “tied” money on the security of project or mortgage bonds.

This issue will not go to the consumer market and will not cause price increases, but will be a significant help to the dying Russian industry, will make life easier for millions of Russian citizens who are forced to buy housing under the usurious percentage.

"Measures for currency control will not work and will lead to further devaluation of the ruble, the emergence of a black market."

First, let's see what Glazyev offers. He believes that the foreign exchange market requires restrictions: for companies that do not conduct export-import operations - a tax on the purchase of foreign currency, for banks - a hard limit on the currency position.

I can note that the unwritten limit already exists. I know for sure that in November-December last year, officials from the Central Bank and so called representatives of the largest banks "on the carpet" and reprimanded them for unjustified currency position (read for speculation).

Glazyev simply suggests to formalize the existing practice. The tax on speculative operations (the so-called “Tobin” tax) was successfully tested not only in Belarus, but also in such a large and economically developed country as Brazil (in 2009 year).

Thus, all these measures are not strange exotic, as some opponents of Glazyev are trying to present to us.

As for the population, the presidential aide does not propose to prohibit the purchase of currency at all (which would really lead to the appearance of a black market). He says that it is worth withdrawing foreign currency deposits from the deposit insurance system. The protection of deposits denominated in national currency is a generally accepted global approach.

For example, our neighbor Japan compensates people only for the contributions that were made in the yen. No insurance deposits in euros, dollars in the country of the Rising Sun does not exist. Why something like this can not be done in Russia?

It is important to understand that it will be difficult to defeat capital outflows without winning corruption. One can argue that the very possibility of freely withdrawing money from the country also breeds corruption, but the fact remains that there are no simple decisions in the field of currency control.

It is reasonable to give an analogy with alcohol. It is possible, of course, for the health of the nation to introduce prohibition, but to defeat drunkenness by simple prohibitions will not work. People will start drinking surrogates, driving moonshine, smugglers will appear.

Another thing is to gradually tighten control over this area, impose restrictions on the timing of the sale of alcohol, the age from which alcohol is available, etc. This method works.

The same is true in the monetary sphere: prohibit enterprises and banks from speculating on the currency - they will find schemes on how to do this by-passing. But the same tax "Tobin" can reduce the attractiveness of these speculations.

The reform of the deposit insurance system will reduce the popularity of foreign currency in the country and restore confidence in the ruble.

All that Glazyev offers is the recovery of the nation, only in the financial and monetary sphere.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. apro 27 October 2015 05: 41 New
    • 33
    • 0
    +33
    Yes, Glazyev is not a stupid specialist, but he offers methods for healing a sovereign country and Russia's sovereignty is severely limited by an independent central bank leading its policy, unlike the president, and who will allow restricting currency transactions? After all, this is the main way to pump out our resources. Only nationalization of our resources and the central bank will allow Russia to pursue a sovereign policy and not depend on the dancers of the dollar.
    1. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 07: 25 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: apro
      and Russia's sovereignty is severely limited by an independent central bank pursuing its own policy, unlike the president, and who will limit foreign exchange operations?

      After all, what kind of Central Bank is this, Nabiulina steers itself for some reason.
      The president has an independent policy, and the Central Bank is directly dependent on everyone except the president and the government. What nonsense. The Central Bank is working exactly as the president and the government should. I hope they do not need to give their statements and performance assessment. repeat
      1. Dembel77 27 October 2015 07: 53 New
        • 15
        • 0
        +15
        Well, Glazyev will definitely not teach you anything bad! There is! There are still smart people in government! Such people themselves will not disappear and they will drag the country out of the crisis. I support reasonable reforms - because time is inexorably passing, and if you sit back - then time will work against us!
        1. avt
          avt 27 October 2015 09: 02 New
          • -7
          • 0
          -7
          Quote: Dembel 77
          There are still smart people in government!

          In the government of Gaidar since the 90s? In another government, Glazyev was not observed fortunately.
          Quote: Dembel 77
          Such people themselves will not disappear and they will drag the country out of the crisis.

          Well, yes, with the party “Homeland” and Rogozin, he made the second run, so where is Rogozin now, where is “Homeland” and where is Glazyev? Do not want to search? laughing Dame direction - look in the EAEU. In general, all this campaign wildly looks like the creation of another sect a la “300 riflemen,” only this theoretician has never put his conclusions into practice - God did not give a horny cow.
          Quote: vladimirZ
          That's just Putin V.V. Will such a big-big question agree to such a pro-Russian course of financial sovereignty?

          Putin, meanwhile, slowly but very firmly took a hold on the banking system and tightens the nuts on the part of cashing out and withdrawing money, closing the trash cans and transfer boxes, making it clear who is not hiding, I'm not guilty, bring the money inside. Without which all these Glazyev’s glitches are an artistic whistle.
          Quote: Alekseev
          The head of the Central Bank and everything, everything, everything can be removed and replaced by the president in one second ...

          Well, not in one of course .... although it is possible in one. laughing
          1. Kindof 28 October 2015 07: 59 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Article from the series: "you still do not understand anything, just believe .."
            I can’t say that the author-interpreter of Glazyev’s proposals lucidly explained .. Rather, he “helped”
            To the question of trust ...
            I recall the 2003 Glazyev initiative for the privatization of mineral resources
            [media = http: // http: //old.kpe.ru/press/mera/139/604/]
            1. Cat man null 28 October 2015 08: 05 New
              • -1
              • 0
              -1
              Quote: Kindof
              I recall the 2003 Glazyev initiative for the privatization of mineral resources

              And also dashing such a glider is recalled, "500 days" was called. Fortunately, unrealized.
        2. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 09: 52 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: Dembel 77
          time will work against us!


          You quoted Siluanov directly, only he had in mind the increase in the retirement period ... if you do not leave hard workers to die near the machine tools, then this is the end of the economy ..
          But thinking left officials to die in the offices wassat
          1. Gomunkul 27 October 2015 13: 47 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            You quoted Siluanov directly, only he had in mind the increase in the retirement period ... if you do not leave hard workers to die near the machine tools, then this is the end of the economy ..
            But thinking left officials to die in the offices
            So maybe they had such an idea? wink How to stay longer and not cause public anger? Here is the solution, let's raise the retirement age for everyone, people in return, we don’t want, the government, well then we will only raise for ourselves. laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Xanna 27 October 2015 11: 13 New
          • -10
          • 0
          -10
          It's like a designer on paper - everything always converges! And how do you start to do a little detail - so you understand that the devil is in the details))).
          That's the same with Glazyev. Everything is beautiful, until they started to implement. As for printing money - why? At VO, and not only at VO many already say that it is impossible to do this and explain why, but Glazyev said and we believe him ...
          In the USA and the Netherlands the same (approximately) ratio of money to GDP and what should we say? Yes, the fact that nothing depends on this indicator at all, and the economy does not benefit.

          No, thanks, enough mega-reform. We somehow, in the old fashioned way, slowly, using proven methods. Let slowly, but less risk. Maybe enough experiments over the past 100 years ?!
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 October 2015 11: 29 New
            • 9
            • 0
            +9
            Quote: Xanna
            As for printing money - why?

            Because money is a product whose consumer value is determined by its ability to exchange for other goods :) And the rules of supply / demand apply to money, as a product. In other words, if the demand for money in the economy significantly exceeds supply, then the value of money (bank interest for using it) grows.
            Adequate money in the economy is cheap loans. Well, what is it for a domestic manufacturer to compete with an import one when it can attract far less credit resources, but will it cost him more?
            Quote: Xanna
            At HE, and not only at HE, many already say that this cannot be done and explain why

            Forgive me, but those who explain this, as a rule, do not know what they explain themselves.
            We have for a long time any issue pumped into the banking system and went into speculation. Therefore, instead of improving the economy, we had growing inflation. It is necessary to get money into the economy in other ways, as Glazyev suggests.
            Quote: Xanna
            No, thanks, enough mega-reform. We somehow, in the old fashioned way, slowly, using proven methods. Let slowly, but less risk.

            So we will hang like a rose in the hole from falling oil prices to falling oil prices? :)))
            1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 11: 39 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              So we will hang like a rose in the hole from falling oil prices to falling oil prices? :)))

              The funny thing is - Glazyev does not offer anything revolutionary - sane and tested methods .. and what does megareform here, hannah is another Kremlin boat?
              1. BMW
                BMW 27 October 2015 12: 08 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: afdjhbn67
                another kremlebot

                Cool wording.
                It still won’t reach the point that until the brains in the head are replaced, nothing in the country will change. People look like stagnation. Almost 50 years went to the Soviet, capitalist came for 20. Progress however. Question number one, how does stagnation end? Add a correction to accelerate social life. Question number two, when will Xanna come.
                1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 12: 51 New
                  • -1
                  • 0
                  -1
                  Quote: bmw
                  It still won’t reach the point that until the brains in the head are replaced, nothing in the country will change. People look like stagnation. Almost 50 years went to the Soviet, capitalist came for 20. However, progress

                  God forbid that history repeats itself twice as a tragedy and farce works .. and if it fails? the second "perestroika" can not stand it ..
                  1. BMW
                    BMW 27 October 2015 14: 22 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: afdjhbn67
                    God forbid that history repeats itself twice

                    Thrice.
                    If you look, then similar processes followed the Napoleonic wars. The trouble is that time is different.
                    Situevina is that "perestroika" is no longer needed; everything is ready for this "event" now. A specific stagnation has not yet begun, so that it can still be corrected and painlessly.
                    1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 16: 53 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: bmw
                      can still be corrected and painless.

                      Misha, dvizhuhi okromya spells and strengthening propaganda, not seen at all once.
                      Medvedev at the head of the government is a sign of the constant course in the economy, despite the fact that they fail to guarantee one after another. After all, the shame with the construction of the cosmodrome shows that even Putin’s authority is not enough already to curb oh .. officials and businessmen ..
            2. avt
              avt 27 October 2015 13: 17 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Because money is a commodity

              laughing Well, in principle, the Fed does just that - it sells $ USA to everyone, and those who refuse, as Stalin refused to smoke the Marshall Plan because of the habit of Herzegovina Flor, so they immediately become bloody tyrants and they already have Air Force democracy USA is carried on the wings of the world, or how the USSR interprets the whole “destructiveness” of the social system through bribery of “elites”, and then the Aganbegyanglazyevs come and theoretically justify how it is necessary to competently buy this very money. There was money before Pavlov’s reform with his pegging to the dollar, generally a tool, a measure of the availability of goods and services produced by the state, and again a tool allowing the exchange of these services and goods without resorting to barter / barter.
              1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 October 2015 14: 34 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: avt
                .Money was, before Pavlov’s reform with its pegging to the dollar, generally a tool, a measure of the availability of goods and services produced by the state and, again, a tool allowing the exchange of these services and goods without resorting to barter / barter.

                This does not contradict what I said :)) In general, the definition of modern money as a commodity has been used for a very long time, even in political economy :)
                First, there was money that in itself had consumer value - all kinds of furs (which could be used for its intended purpose — to sew a fur coat, for example) or gold (which could be used to make jewelry. That is, this money could be used as goods, or you can exchange them for other goods, however, after abandoning the gold standard, money no longer has value in itself - why do you need cut paper? Its value is that it has the property of being exchanged for other goods. the price is your work (they won’t pay otherwise), and if you want to borrow, please, but on the terms of urgency, payment and repayment :) Well, what has a price, cost, utility to the consumer is a commodity :)
            3. Xanna 27 October 2015 13: 52 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              1. This is the best solution - cover ourselves with authority! Does anyone here have their own opinion?
              We argue that if Glazyev said that money should not be printed - everyone would shout "Hurray, you can’t!"

              2. We discuss (even condemn) the policy of printing unsecured dollars in the USA and do it right. BUT, the US dollar is still in demand in the world, unlike our ruble, no matter how much we love it.
              Have you figured out how to provide another bunch of money supply, without allowing the final rolling of the ruble into a ditch? Or is Glazyev sanely explaining why there will be no inflation?

              Although you can blame the comments that are objectionable to Glazyev’s fans, nothing will change from that!

              Dear, close your eyes, and try to name for yourself the reason why inflation will not happen with an increase in the money supply in the country? Happened? If yes - you are a great economist, it is time for you to give the Nobel Prize, and if not - then what kind of applause do we applaud?
              1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 16: 56 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Xanna
                which inflation will not occur with an increase in the money supply in the country?

                and that there is no inflation in the country? how much did prices jump for everything? only money for freedom of maneuver was not given
            4. Xanna 27 October 2015 13: 56 New
              • -1
              • 0
              -1
              We have for a long time any issue pumped into the banking system and went into speculation. Therefore, instead of improving the economy, we had growing inflation. It is necessary to get money into the economy in other ways, as Glazyev suggests.


              This emission will go in speculation anyway! Only inflation will also be added.
              1. avt
                avt 27 October 2015 14: 29 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Xanna
                This emission will go in speculation anyway! Only inflation will also be added.

                But what about, the "All-Regulating Market"? wassat Can you correct the exchange of razz?
                Quote: Xanna
                We argue that if Glazyev said that money should not be printed - everyone would shout "Hurray, you can’t!"

                Just not with me laughing
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                Adequate money in the economy is cheap loans.

                How are these mortgage Fanny and Freddy May doing interesting? Here is all this fuss with pieces of paper as money and when all speculators of their money, even electronic ones, don’t have enough money to add derivatives to them - securities, and even when at the trading floor - the exchange of the shaher maher with all of them it becomes so decisive in the economy so that the layman takes his breath away and rushes into reasoning, at that moment the collapse of the real economy begins with the production of something in a specific material, or in the form of a service, because rustling with papers, and now just don’t even push a button, but follow the computer program, “selling valuable assets,” can not be compared with the stolen theft of added value in the real economy, well, what Mordechai Levy named Marx described. Just like in advertising - we are sitting, and the money is coming. Well, the result is known for all this.
                1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 October 2015 14: 40 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: avt
                  How are these mortgage Fanny and Freddy May doing interesting?

                  Don’t believe it - it’s not at all interesting. I am interested in equality of opportunity. If the capitalist in the West acquires the latest equipment on credit at 3% per annum, and I - at 15%, then our competition is a little uneven, don’t you?
                  1. avt
                    avt 27 October 2015 15: 20 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    . I am interested in equality of opportunity. If the capitalist in the West buys the latest equipment on credit at 3% per annum, and I - at 15%, then our competition is a bit uneven, don’t you?

                    I do not find it precisely because of the reasons I have indicated. If you like -
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    First, there was money, which in itself had consumer value - all kinds of furs (which could be used for its intended purpose - to sew a fur coat, for example) or gold (which could be used to make jewelry.

                    That is, even in your version there is quite a real, material economy, and in the current version of the “trading floors” even there are practically NO pieces of paper - computer programs are competing. Even from the previous crisis Ben Bernanki deduced without scattering, as he had earlier called for dollars from a helicopter, but just by pressing a button, I capitalized the “systemically forming” banks. So it’s quite clear to yourself - you won’t sew a coat, you won’t make a decoration and you won’t even be able to use toilet paper. But to give credit to such lenders you will have to swear about the real sector of the economy without any chances to pay.
                  2. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 16: 00 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    If the capitalist in the West buys the latest equipment on credit at 3% per annum, and I - at 15%, then our competition is a bit uneven, don’t you?
                    QED lol

                    The national struggle under the conditions of rising capitalism is a struggle between the bourgeois classes. Sometimes the bourgeoisie succeeds in drawing the proletariat into the national movement, and then the national struggle in appearance takes on a "nation-wide" character, but this only in appearance. In its essence, it always remains bourgeois, profitable and pleasing mainly to the bourgeoisie.
                    I. Stalin T.2 s.308
                    1. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 02: 07 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Uncle Joe
                      I. Stalin T.2 s.308

                      Great uncle, take my profile picture .. good laughing
                2. The comment was deleted.
              2. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 17: 00 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Xanna
                This emission will go in speculation anyway!

                and this does not mean the depravity of the system built in the economy? I remember in China everyone who was at least indirectly guilty of the fall of Shanghai composite was punished sourly. What do we have? Allegedly they gathered bankers in the Kremlin and threatened with a finger .. total irresponsibility, multiplied by impunity - these are the results of the reign of Solntseky ..
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Kindof 28 October 2015 08: 16 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Unreasonably minus. I - for justice: plus you

            I am afraid of these theories taken from the ceiling .. Beautifully draws, you can’t say anything .. Some ideas catch.
            But why there is no analysis of the available positive experience of overcoming the crisis - the same Primakov Government in 1998?
            Why is there no clear model where all factors and all players are honestly named and taken into account: speculators, transnational corporations, industry, resellers, corrupt officials, small businesses, etc. The economy operates with risks and probabilities, but still closer to the exact sciences.
            And then another question: if the economic field is also used by the enemies of Russia to destroy the country - is it really necessary to bring “the concept of saving the economy” for general discussion?
            The actions of the economic bloc, in this case, should be similar to the actions of the General Staff.
      2. g1v2 27 October 2015 15: 53 New
        • -5
        • 0
        -5
        I remember everybody watered the reform of Serdyukov with ddm - after 4 years we saw a powerful and modern army, which everyone applauds. Now the townsfolk are also pouring water on the Central Bank and the government - it is encouraging, so after 4-5 years we will admire the economy. laughing The funny thing is that most of Glazyev’s fans, who are tearing the British flag here, didn’t even read his report to the Security Council, but rather repeated a couple of quotes from his report. I’m not talking about comprehending the report - the layman doesn’t need it, he will be cheated that these are all mega-ideas that will save Russia. wassat For those who have not read, I explain. Glazyev's report is in fact a plan for preparing the economy for a full-scale war. This is a plan for limited self-isolation. Quite a good plan for this particular case. And most likely he will go to the shelf until the moment when a full-fledged war will be recognized as inevitable. However, he completely crosses out the economic policy that allowed us to break out of the 90s and seriously improve the standard of living of the population. In the oceans, ribbons, auchans - queues, in inexpensive jewelry stores before the holidays - queues, on the roads - traffic jams from cars, my operator, whom my wife left behind with her three children at the time, recently bought a Samsung phone for 56 thousand, in Turkey and Egypt hotels are constantly clogged by Russian tourists. And these are not big officials or oligarchs - they have other shops and places of rest, but the most ordinary working people. WHEN ARE WE WELL SO GOOD? The answer is simple - never. In the USSR, for sure. I was born in the USSR and I think that its collapse is a catastrophe and a crime, but I do not need to tell how well it lived especially the last 7 years with the tagged. Well, if you can’t earn a living in your city, either kick your governor or raise a zu and go to those regions where you need hands and pay well. Nobody will wipe the snot. If you want to live well, you have to move. Capitalism, however, is what millions of doctors throated for in the 80s.
        Well, another Glazyev’s plan is surrender. This is a recognition that we will not be able to compete in the global economy and influence it. This can only lead to the fact that sooner or later we will be economically crushed, no matter what growth rate he draws on paper - 10 percent or 20. Now they didn’t crush us economically, they just scratched us precisely because Europe was connected with us and its losses were unacceptable to her. That is why hollander and Merkel to the GDP themselves flew at the beginning of the year and entered into a separate armistice called Minsk2. The process goes on both sides - they penetrate to us, and we to them. Okay, I’m on the night shift today, so I’ll end this with a lecture. hi
    2. vladimirZ 27 October 2015 07: 27 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote apro (2):
      Yes, Glazyev is not a stupid specialist, but he offers methods for healing a sovereign country and Russia's sovereignty is very limited ...
      ... Only the nationalization of our resources and the central bank will allow Russia to pursue a sovereign policy and not depend on the dances of the dollar.

      But you need to start at least with something. You can start with the proposed measures by Academician Glazyev.
      Everything is in the power of President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin: as a change of the Government of Russia, with the dismissal of the current one for their failed economic policy, and the change of leadership of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, in order to break it from the pro-American financial rate.
      That's just Putin V.V. Will such a big-big question agree to such a pro-Russian course of financial sovereignty?
      Russian President Putin V.V. repeatedly confirmed that he remains a constant supporter of liberal pro-Western economic policy.
      Will he be able to change his attitude and the policy of financial sovereignty of Russia, after giving up on it for more than 15 years of power? Great doubt.
      1. vladimirZ 27 October 2015 08: 09 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I just watched a video by Mikhail Zadornov about the policies of Putin and the Government of the Russian Federation dated 16.06. 2015 on YouTube, came across by accident.
        https://youtu.be/-YtMsbif9ZM
        Zadornov, an actor, a person who does not understand the intricacies of the economy, but understands the essence of modern Russian politicians, the essence of the current Government of the Russian Federation and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
        1. Gardamir 27 October 2015 08: 34 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          https://youtu.be/-YtMsbif9ZM
      2. Xanna 27 October 2015 11: 15 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        To whom will we change? In our country, in general, all financiers are pro-American, others do not exist))))))))))))
    3. Alekseev 27 October 2015 07: 32 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: apro
      Russian sovereignty is severely limited by an independent central bank leading its policy, unlike the president,

      Naivety.
      The head of the Central Bank and everything, everything, everything can be removed and replaced by the president in one second ...
      Just for now, they believe that they are doing everything right. yes
      I also don’t think that Glazyev is dismissed as a buzzing fly. Otherwise, I would not have kept his GDP as advisor.
      But his useful suggestions can and should be introduced not publicly, so as not to frighten off market participants. After all, the question of abolishing a market economy is not worth it?
      And the truth, as it should be, is most likely somewhere in the middle.
      1. Kostyar 27 October 2015 08: 00 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        The head of the Central Bank and everything, everything, everything can be removed and replaced by the president in one second ...

        According to the Gaidar-Chabais constitution, the President can only appoint, but not dismiss ...., and it is not a fact that the appointment will be approved!
        1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 09: 47 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Bone
          The president can only appoint, but not dismiss ...., and it's not a fact that the appointment will be approved!


          And remember how quickly the article on the constitution was changed in the presidential term? So the rest of the articles of the constitution of Putin are satisfied
          1. BMW
            BMW 27 October 2015 12: 20 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            And remember how quickly the article on the constitution was changed in the presidential term?

            Not a word, people only had time to pat their eyes and you have a longer term.
        2. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 16: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Bone
          According to the Gaidar-Chabais constitution
          laughing

          The president can only appoint, but not dismiss
          83.c) decide on the resignation of the Government of the Russian Federation;
          d) poses before the State Duma the question of dismissal of the Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation;
          e) dismissal of deputy chairmen of the Government of the Russian Federation, federal ministers;

          Law on the Central Bank 3. The objectives of the Bank of Russia are: to protect and ensure the stability of the ruble;
          20. The Chairman of the Bank of Russia: 7) bears full responsibility for the activities of the Bank of Russia;
          14. The Chairman of the Bank of Russia may be removed from office only in the following cases: violation of federal laws that regulate issues related to the activities of the Bank of Russia. (re-read article 3 and recall how much the rupe fell ...)

          In general, this is a pathology of consciousness of some kind - first, screaming that Putin is the most influential politician that bends the United States and his family, and then prove that he cannot remove the head of the Central Bank appointed by him.
        3. Cat man null 28 October 2015 00: 11 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Quote: Bone
          The head of the Central Bank and everything, everything, everything can be removed and replaced by the president in one second ... According to the Gaidar-Chabais constitution, the President can only appoint, but not dismiss ..

          Well, not everything is so bad ... for example:

          Quote: FEDERAL LAW ON THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (BANK OF RUSSIA) N 86-ФЗ
          5 Article. Bank of Russia reports to the State Duma
          Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.
          The State Duma:
          appoints and dismisses
          Bank of Russia Chairman to the President
          Russian Federation
          ;


          Quote: Bone
          and it’s not a fact that the appointment will be approved!

          State Duma ?? Will not approve ?? Zadornova you have already surpassed, dear laughing

          PS: And, mind you, in the case of the Chairman of the Central Bank, the Constitution, as it were, has nothing to do with it .. there is a Law on the Central Bank, read - it says a lot of interesting things wink
    4. War and Peace 27 October 2015 08: 30 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Earlier, Glazyev was at odds with Rogozhin, created a party, went to the polls, but then quarreled and fled, Rogozhin fell into power, and Glazyev remained on the contrary, offers various programs for overcoming crises, where Russia is constantly slipping, but his ideas for this power are unacceptable. Glazyev for Russia, and the government for liberal reforms and they don’t hear him ...
      1. Buffalo 27 October 2015 10: 03 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        You confuse Rogozin with Rogozhin.
    5. Tambov Wolf 27 October 2015 11: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The sovereignty of the country is generally determined by the desire of the people and the government chosen by this people. Most of our people want it, but the smaller part, which includes the elected government, does not want it. If you wanted to, then a referendum on the Constitution had long been held or the Constitutional Assembly. It would be a long time ago to pass laws that fully express sovereignty. When it is necessary, everything is accepted in two hours, and when they don’t want it, they stir up water for centuries. For example, a law has been passed for approval in the first reading, saying, The people of Russia should live well .After the second reading, it turns out, The People of Russia should live. After the third reading, The People of Russia should. It was already published in one publication. But it is. Therefore, so that they don’t write, they don’t say, at least come out with a cry, if the authorities don’t want, nothing will not. Tell me, we’ll say they’ll choose another. I will answer as necessary, and they will count. And if they don’t have nowhere to go, they will outbid, intimidate, etc. While the tsar and the prince of all Russia do not want to move a finger, so the mess and will be. Otherwise, the whole gang with the Nabiullins, G Refs, Ulyukaevs and others like them, have long been extracting wood for the needs of the country on Quiché.
    6. kepmor 27 October 2015 12: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      There can be no talk of any nationalization in today's RUSSIA? Does the existing "power vertical" (read the oligarchs, bureaucratic clans, financial groups and the "close circle of friends") want these changes !? Yes, not in life! The fact of the matter is that in foreign policy the GDP is more or less free, but as for the internal affairs of the economy, development - “tearing up" the budget, the bowels of RUSSIA (the "public domain"), then here is full P .... TS! Maybe the KING would like to change something for the better, but really and bloodlessly can’t! He is now a hostage of the system that he himself created!
      Without a radical change in the socio-political structure of the Russian Federation, all actions in the economy will not bring success!
    7. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 15: 47 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: apro
      Russian sovereignty is severely limited
      Before you write nonsense about limiting sovereignty, climb into the dictionary and see what it is.

      As for Glazyev’s proposals, the only thing he offers is not to limit himself to state support exclusively for raw materials and financial capital, and to support production capital along with them.

      The final consumer, he is the people, does not appear in principle in Glazyev’s schemes, and the purpose of the proposed actions is not to ensure the interests and needs of the bulk of the population, but more “fair”, more even state support for the owners of the means of production.

      Russian sovereignty is severely limited by an independent central bank
      Which is independent exclusively in the minds of individual Internet users, who are happy to absorb tons of noodles that they are fed by figures from NOD and air defense, and who usually have no idea what they are going to talk about.

      And in part 2 of article 75 of the constitution, and in part 2 of article 1 of the Central Bank law, the Russian language says that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation independently carries out its main function (protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble) - that it is independent as such there is not a word.
      Moreover, paragraph 1 of Article 4 of the law separately states that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation develops and implements a unified state monetary policy, of which monetary emission is a part, in conjunction with the government formed by the president, who determines the main directions of the policy.

      and who will limit currency transactions?
      And who and when with his signature canceled article 21 of the law “On Currency Regulation and Currency Control”, in accordance with which the Central Bank had the right to set the standard for compulsory sale of foreign currency earnings within 30% of the proceeds, are you not interested?

      Only the nationalization of our resources and the central bank
      Only resources in accordance with Article 2 of the Law "On Subsoil" are owned by the state, and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a government agency.

      not depend on the dancer of the dollar
      In order not to depend on the dances of the dollar, you need to produce domestically what is now bought abroad.

      Only this will not happen because:

      29.09.2009/XNUMX/XNUMX Putin - "... I want to emphasize once again and say: there will be no return to the past. Russia will remain a liberal market economy. Today I want to repeat once again: we will consistently continue the line of encouraging private initiative and integration into the world economy ... "
      http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=317679

      21.01.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX Putin - “We must think what to do, how to build our own policy. Of course, we will act in the logic of a market economy”
      http://www.rg.ru/2015/01/21/putin-ekonomika-site.html

      13.10.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX Russian President Vladimir Putin praised the government and the Central Bank for acting in times of crisis. “I allow myself to say kind words to the government of the Russian Federation, the Central Bank. Despite all the difficulties and difficulties that the Russian economy has encountered, our economic management team has demonstrated a high level of responsibility, consistency and consistently achieved results, ”Mr. Putin quoted Interfax from the VTB Capital forum“ Russia is Calling! ” .
      http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2831584
    8. Foreman49 27 October 2015 22: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Putin and HIS Gaidar will not allow Glazyev to implement his program.
  2. bear 27 October 2015 05: 53 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    All that Glazyev offers is the improvement of the nation, only in the financial and monetary sectors

    I am for the reform of Glazyev.
    1. nazar_0753 27 October 2015 11: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I am also for it, but I'm afraid that his plan may begin to be implemented at about the same time that Half-life 3 is coming out. That is never
      1. Tektor 27 October 2015 13: 45 New
        • -3
        • 0
        -3
        If you translate his sentences into Russian, then Glazyev offers us to give up. They will destroy us if we crouch within our borders. It is vitally important for us not to give countries and regions of the world to Western jackals for no reason. I would like to suffer ...
  3. Tatar 174 27 October 2015 05: 54 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    I am not a strong economist and not an economist at all, but it is clear that Glazyev offers the measures that we really need. So what's the deal? What are we worth?
    1. Magadan 27 October 2015 07: 27 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Tartar 174
      So what's the deal? What are we worth?


      But does it need a liberal economic bloc? Someone will give guarantees that Messrs. Managers of the Russian economy DO NOT work for the State Department?
      Personally, I believe that the State Department controls their actions PERSONAL.
      It has long been known that Russia cannot be defeated in the forehead. But Russia is easily falling apart from the inside with the help of traitors.
      So, guys, either there will be an article in Russia for wrecking, Oprichnina and 37y year in relation to the power of those holding bureaucrats, or they will continue to fall apart.
      1. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 09: 24 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Magadan
        Oprichnina and the 37th year in relation to the power of those holding bureaucrats, or will fall apart further.

        Putin's response to recall? 37 years will not be and do not hope ...
      2. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 16: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Magadan
        But does it need a liberal economic bloc?
        Who formed this hypothetically existing bloc, appointing specific persons to specific posts?

        Personally, I believe that the State Department controls their actions PERSONAL
        So the appointee controls in the first place, otherwise he would not have appointed them (to which they agreed) laughing
    2. Vita vko 27 October 2015 07: 39 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Tartar 174
      I am not a strong economist

      Mutually, but in my opinion, the situation in the economy was worse than now in the 90s. Something needs to be done. Glazyev offers real steps and they could certainly help if it were not for the stupid bureaucracy of criminal clans and rampant corruption. Until effective with this evil begins, all efforts to improve the economy will have the opposite effect.
  4. ImPerts 27 October 2015 05: 55 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Read this article on a look site. Very interested in the composition of the Stolypin club.
    And there is also the opinion of Academician Aganbegyan:
    “It will take extra efforts to overcome the negative consequences of reduced investments, capital outflows, the need to pay annually to foreign investors 100 and more than a billion dollars for large corporate debt without the ability to refinance in the West or restructure debts. We have to overcome the backwardness of our fixed assets and especially their active parts - machinery and equipment, whose average age has reached almost 14 years (twice as high as in advanced countries). Our dependence on . Ovnya export prices for oil, gas, raw materials export revenues in 2015, the reduced - about $ 180 billion.
    We need urgent powerful efforts, high political will to fundamentally change our policy, move to accelerated investments with growth at 10% per year, reduce inflation and the key rate (at least to 4-5%), begin institutional reforms and finally ensure , socio-economic growth. The funds received from this should be directed to raising incomes of the population, increasing the size of pensions, doubling housing and social construction.
    For all this, we have gigantic domestic resources in the form of banking system assets, which in 2014 exceeded GDP and amounted to about 72 trillion rubles, as well as huge state budget funds together with state extrabudgetary funds (pension, etc.) in the amount of 38 % Of GDP. It is necessary to take into account the country's foreign exchange reserves, by which we are ahead of almost all developed countries of the world. Another resource is the rather high financial performance of our enterprises and organizations, which has increased in recent months. "
    PS One of the projects supported by Delovaya Rossiya is the creation of the Stolypin Club, which is designed to help revive the tradition of heated debate, expert discussions and intellectual polemics about the fate of the motherland. The initiators of its creation are public and political figures of the liberal-patriotic direction, among them the director general of the New Commonwealth OJSC K. Babkin, the director of the Stolypin Center project Y. Girenko, the State Duma deputy M. Emelyanov, the chairman of Delovaya Rossiya B. Titov and other
    http://www.mgodeloros.ru/projects/stolypinskij-klub
    1. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 06: 28 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: ImPerts
      It is necessary to overcome the backwardness of our fixed assets and especially their active part - machinery and equipment, whose average age has reached almost 14 years (twice as high as in advanced countries).

      He is lying openly, because the state generally does not stimulate the modernization and replacement of production assets. The current system actually slows down the process of replacing and upgrading equipment.
      Quote: ImPerts
      Super efforts will be required to overcome the negative consequences of reduced investments, capital outflows, and the need to annually pay foreign investors $ 100 and more billion to large corporate debt without the possibility of re-crediting in the West or restructuring debts.

      Again the old song - the west will help us. Yes, this west has seen us in one place.
      Instead of lending our own production directly to the state (there are many ways), we lend to the West for a low interest rate. But at the same time, we are going to this west asking for loans at horse interest. fool
    2. avt
      avt 27 October 2015 10: 17 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: ImPerts
      And there is also the opinion of Academician Aganbegyan:

      Do not remind which? And I just remember the time of the hunch building, well, its main theorist is that now Glazyev dominated the economy and seemed to even hold a post in the government, well, Gorbaty was definitely an adviser, unlike Glazyev now. Doesn't his son hold the MICEX-RTS exchange for an hour? wassat
  5. Jarilo 27 October 2015 05: 57 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    The rapid increase in prices for imported goods, which have risen in price due to a sharp (two-fold) devaluation of the ruble. And who arranged this devaluation?

    Nabiulina arranged, the ruble is tied to the price of oil, writing a formula in which the dependence of the value of the dollar on the cost of oil is 100 percent, while in the structure of export oil takes 20 percent. The liberals have long wanted to clarify the ruble, believing that this will help our economy, but in reality - an exporter of the same oil. The government serves the interests of oil exporters, and the industry is secondary, if it suddenly rises, then it certainly has nothing to do with it, they pressed as much as possible with taxes and interest.
    1. Uncle lee 27 October 2015 06: 20 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      If power were in power and not a liberal group fulfilling the orders of our “partners”, then Glazyev’s reforms would have been to the court and had success!
    2. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 12: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Jarilo
      Nabiulina arranged, the ruble is tied to the price of oil, writing a formula in which the dependence of the value of the dollar on the cost of oil is 100 percent,

      So, she took and arranged and wrote a clever, encrypted formula, and she tied the oil herself, and alone. Straight witch. And the president and the government are beating, their heads are broken, they do not sleep at night and go to the gym together so as not to fall asleep. This formula is written by the devilish runes so that no one could read it except the Fed. laughing
      1. Jarilo 27 October 2015 13: 29 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Maybe not herself, but the prize was given to her as the most ingenious financier in the world. Maybe she, of course, later shared with the real authors, but I think that for them it's seeds.
        1. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 02: 37 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Jarilo
          but the prize was given to her as the most ingenious financier in the world.

          these prizes scare me from the enemies .. one Putin’s also the best in the world, even Putin removed from the government ..
    3. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 16: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Jarilo
      Nabiulina arranged
      Central Bank Law

      4. The Bank of Russia performs the following functions: 1) in collaboration with the Government of the Russian Federation, develops and implements a unified state monetary policy;


      Chapter III. National Banking Council.

      13. The competence of the National Banking Council includes:

      4) consideration of improving the banking system of the Russian Federation;

      5) consideration of the draft main directions of a unified state monetary policy and the main directions of a unified state monetary policy;

      6) resolving issues related to the participation of the Bank of Russia in the capital of credit organizations;

      7) the appointment of the chief auditor of the Bank of Russia and the consideration of its reports;

      8) quarterly review of information of the Board of Directors on the main issues of the Bank of Russia:
      implementation of the main directions of the unified state monetary policy;
      banking regulation and banking supervision;
      implementation of the policy of currency regulation and currency control;
      organization of a settlement system in the Russian Federation;
      execution of cost estimates of the Bank of Russia;
      preparation of draft legislative acts and other regulatory acts in the field of banking;

      12. The number of the National Banking Council is 12, of which two are sent by the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation from among the members of the Federation Council, three by the State Duma from among the deputies of the State Duma, three by the President of the Russian Federation, three by the Government of the Russian Federation. The National Banking Council also includes the Chairman of the Bank of Russia.

      But she specifically arranged Sahipzadovna lol
  6. Vovan 73 27 October 2015 06: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Everything that Glazyev offers is realizable. But a prerequisite for these measures is also the nationalization of the Central Bank and the raw materials sector. And the first is the most critical. An independent CBR is a direct threat to the country's financial security.
    1. Stelth1985 27 October 2015 10: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      For nationalization, you need to kill everyone upstairs! What do you think that they themselves will give everything to you ???
    2. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 02: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Vova 73
      nationalization of the Central Bank and the commodity sector.

      Not a fact - just a strengthening of control and fair business ..
  7. Concealer 27 October 2015 06: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Glazyev’s proposals are inherently conservative. What does he actually offer? And the proposal is banal, saving a dying economic system by introducing elements of a planned economy. At its core, its proposal is the conservation of the existing economic system as it is. This is the road to nowhere.
    To understand the situation, it is necessary to accept as a fact that the existing economic is dying. There are objective reasons for this, and they are common to all countries of the capitalist model. And precisely these reasons have already destroyed the planned economy of the USSR. And therefore, a dying economy can no longer be saved by any “strategic planning” or “state control”. The only way out is a complete change in the economic model.
    But in order to change the economic model, it is necessary to change the production model. And for this, everything you need is right now. But there is one caveat - this will turn the power of the ruling financial elite into nothing. It is their Glazyev who defends trying to preserve the economic model.
    But there is only one way out today - a change in the production model and a subsequent change in the historical formation. And everything should begin with the elementary - free access to the means of production and the understanding that the main value of modern production is the people themselves, not the machines and equipment.
    There is such an expression, historical inevitability. This is she herself. She is already here.
    1. Just BB 27 October 2015 07: 50 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Did you understand what you wrote?
      What is dying? Which system?
      "Scheme" - yes! there is! - for free pumping of natural resources from the territory.
      And all this is "vparivaetsya" as a kind of "economic system"

      Pay attention to how reluctantly the Chinese put the "pipes". Well done! Following the teachings of their ancient sages, they try to fulfill them: "Why buy from a neighbor what will soon belong to us" (the site seems to be about a military topic)
      1. Concealer 27 October 2015 08: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        A simple question: What is the distribution of production costs today, what is the share of intellectual property created directly by people, and not by machines and mechanisms? And this will be the answer to the question which economic system is dying.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 October 2015 10: 30 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Concealer
          Simple question

          Simple answer
          Quote: Concealer
          What is the distribution of production costs today?

          It depends on the industry of the enterprise and the modernity of its OS
          Quote: Concealer
          what is the share of intellectual property created directly by people, and not by machines and mechanisms

          Fortunately, machines and mechanisms do not yet have developed artificial intelligence and are not able to create intellectual property laughing This time. The second - the intellectual property of people in the broad sense of the word covers ALL the costs of production (since any product can be considered a product of human intellectual property - would not have been invented, it would not have been, and even minerals are no exception - people have come up with how to get them and use). And always embraced - since the Stone Age :)) And in the narrow sense of the word "intellectual property" is the so-called. intangible assets, patents and the like - their share in the cost of modern products is very small.
          Quote: Concealer
          And this will be the answer to the question which economic system is dying.

          This is not an answer.
    2. Karabanov 27 October 2015 09: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Concealer
      Glazyev’s proposals are inherently conservative. What does he actually offer? And the proposal is banal, saving a dying economic system by introducing elements of a planned economy. At its core, its proposal is the conservation of the existing economic system as it is. This is the road to nowhere.

      Here I recall Quentin Tarantino, who, to a journalist’s question:
      - You haven’t filmed anything better than “Pulp Fiction” ...
      Answered:
      - And who took it off?
      Who will offer the best model? And those that have already been voiced (an example of the Central Bank) will not bring anything new, because initially vicious and in fact only justify the existing system.
      I honestly don’t see alternatives.
      1. Concealer 27 October 2015 10: 44 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: Karabanov
        I honestly don’t see alternatives.

        Can you watch inattentively?
        If you think the dogmas of the now dominant economic model, then there really is no way out.
        But the economy begins with a production model, not with trade relations, and not with the Central Bank regulating trade relations.
        But at the level of the production model, the solution is obvious. If the last hundred years, the only possible production model was an industrial one, now it’s not. There are other alternatives to organizing social production. Now there is no longer any need for mega-concentrations of industrial capacity in megacities. Now the production can be small and compact and high-tech. So, there may be a distributed production model. Which means the literal actual distribution of production capacities across the territory, this means production on demand, production on order. Which fundamentally contradicts the principles of mass industrial production. And as an inevitable consequence, it fundamentally changes the economic model and depreciates large banking capital. This is where all the fuss in the economy comes from.
        So there is an alternative. And she is slowly developing right now. You can help her or try to stop the historical development in order to save the "financial elite".
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 October 2015 11: 01 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Concealer
          If you think the dogmas of the now dominant economic model, then there really is no way out.

          There is. Generally speaking, the exit is spelled out at the level of such “primer” as “Economics” by Bru and McConnell.
          Quote: Concealer
          But the economy begins with a production model, not with trade relations, and not with the Central Bank regulating trade relations.

          The economy begins with need, and the need is satisfied precisely by trade relations. This does not mean that trade dominates production, but they are interconnected.
          Quote: Concealer
          If the last hundred years the only possible production model was an industrial model, now there is no

          wassat And what happened? Someone invented the magic wand, or did the aliens deliver a large batch of old Hottabychs?
          Quote: Concealer
          Now there is no longer the need for mega-concentrations of industrial capacity in megacities

          Just as it is. If only because the staffing of production. In the village of Gadyukino, I’m afraid you won’t find a steelmaker or operator of CNC machines due to the lack of foundries and CNC machines there. In addition, industrial agglomeration wins in logistics.
          Quote: Concealer
          Now production can be small and compact and high-tech

          Which is far from being in any case more effective than megacorporation, which wins simply on the effect of scale and the ability to conduct R&D.
          Quote: Concealer
          Which means the literal actual distribution of production capacities across the territory, this means production on demand, production on order. Which fundamentally contradicts the principles of mass industrial production.

          Custom-made production is now being introduced almost everywhere. And the distribution over the territory ... The Chinese have already poured steel in every yard. Did not work out.
          Quote: Concealer
          And as an inevitable consequence, it fundamentally changes the economic model and depreciates large banking capital

          Why would it be? The means of production in your distributed model have not become more effective than those that we have now (just not why), and if so, it all comes down to the disaggregation of production (while the total number of means of production does not decrease). And if so, then the need for bank capital for their acquisition and operation will not decrease. The distributed production model does not concern bank capital at all.
          Quote: Concealer
          This is where all the fuss in the economy comes from.

          Not from here :)
          1. Concealer 28 October 2015 19: 28 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Which is far from being in any case more effective than megacorporation, which wins simply on the effect of scale and the ability to conduct R&D.

            Classical fallacy. Financial assets do not add brains. Ludy do not know how to create for money, they do it because they have such an inner need and not otherwise.
            As for the share of human intellectual labor in manufactured products, this should not be confused with intellectual property. These are different things. And today, the share of intellectual labor in products has become dominant. And as I think you guess, for this type of production machines and equipment are not required at all. And as a result, it decreases for the profit of owners of machine tools and equipment. Draw your own conclusions.
    3. asiat_61 28 October 2015 00: 45 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, you are my friend, a revolutionary?
      1. Concealer 28 October 2015 19: 21 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        No, evolutionist. I just follow the logic of the development of the means of production. The industrial model of mass production has exhausted itself. It is time for individual and unit production as required. So it’s stupid to think that an economic model based on mass production will continue to exist. What actually happens.
        And the proposals of Glazyev are an attempt by economic methods of the industrial model to control the post-industrial economy. Does this seem strange to you?
  8. EvgNik 27 October 2015 06: 23 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Well, all the people understand that the Central Bank should be state-owned. That it is impossible to give some enterprises to private hands. If everything is in private use (especially since the gentlemen from the west dispose of the most valuable assets), then the government will ultimately be bought by those with money.
  9. warriordima 27 October 2015 06: 36 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In economics, I’m not a boom, but Glazyev at least does not cause antipathy for me))
  10. Mitrich76 27 October 2015 06: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Glazyev’s proposals look very interesting. But their implementation requires people who understand the essence of these events. Unfortunately, our financiers and economists have been taught for decades to act according to Western methods, without taking steps left and right. Everyone is used to acting on cheat sheets. Glazyev alone will not be able to complete the entire amount of work, not Superman, but what about his assistants? Will all undertakings fail because of incompetence, or even direct sabotage? This point also needs to be considered before deciding to implement.
  11. dog1965 27 October 2015 06: 37 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The transition from a liberal economy to the measures that Glazyev proposed is an exam for the authorities. If it takes place, then we can say - we got rid of the dictates of transnational corporations. Replacing the liberal blunders of Ulyukaev, Siluanov, Shuvalov, Nabiulina with economists who do not worship the Washington Consensus and will mean that Russia has finally become independent in its politics. And the first sign of this transition to independence is the dismissal of Red. This is the type of "looking" from multinationals. And no matter how they scolded the creation of various "closed partnerships" at the UN or Valdai, without decisive action among our economic power structures, this will be a simple air shock.
  12. Nitarius 27 October 2015 06: 55 New
    • -7
    • 0
    -7
    GDP, well, turn your eyes to it! Listen to a smart man! I think that the GDP knows .. but the step and the time has not come yet!
    1. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 07: 04 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Nitarius
      but the step and time has not come yet!

      And when will it come, when will we go around the world? It is necessary to do, well, at least something, otherwise a khan, all the more there are reasonable proposals. There is no will or desire.
      1. Vadim237 27 October 2015 12: 51 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        To make it all, you need money, and where to raise taxes for everything, at a price of $ 50 per barrel this year, our budget will receive less than 900 billion rubles in this situation, our reserve fund in 2016 will be reduced to zero. In principle, all officials can be reduced by 60 percent, but this again takes time and money.
    2. Bongo 27 October 2015 07: 12 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Nitarius
      GDP knows .. but the step and the time has not come yet!

      And when will it come? Should another 15 years pass?
      1. anip 27 October 2015 07: 59 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        Quote: Bongo
        Quote: Nitarius

        GDP knows .. but the step and the time has not come yet!

        And when will it come? Should another 15 years pass?

        Exactly. 15 years is not enough for the guarantor, he still needs as much. Apparently completely confused in his "multi-path".

        In the meantime, we have:
    3. Stirbjorn 27 October 2015 09: 22 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nitarius
      I think that the GDP knows .. but the step and the time has not come yet!

      This is now in Ukraine a very popular excuse. We still have to be patient, tighten our belts, which means reforms there and then - pensions of 1000 euros, a visa-free regime with the EU, I’ve shorter! But for now - have to be patient! wassat
      1. Zankish 27 October 2015 14: 18 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        In Ukraine-this is not our ....
        It has always been in Ukraine)
    4. afdjhbn67 27 October 2015 09: 42 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nitarius
      but the step and time has not come yet!


      What should it come when, together with marginals, ordinary people will go to the swamp? is it worth it to bring to this?
      The tops can’t, the lower classes don’t want - doesn’t resemble anything?
  13. sledge 27 October 2015 07: 25 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    When will he be heard? It seems that neither the management nor the business (read the oligarchs) need this recovery ... recourse
  14. KGB WATCH YOU 27 October 2015 07: 27 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    I do not always agree with Glazyev, but I clearly understand that it is impossible to build an economy like that further. At the same time, I notice that Putin doesn't care, Medvedev doesn't care, Nabiullina doesn't care. But we have 89.9%, if you understand what I mean what We are following the right liberal path. It is not liberal, not planned, but liberal - that is, in our words “liberalism”, but it is controlled by organized crime groups, with corruption and nepotism, the lack of freedom of entrepreneurs (small and medium), all kinds of unprofitable and miserable “national treasures”, without the possibility receive resources from national banks at adequate interest rates, etc. And do not see any clearance ...
    1. Pulya 27 October 2015 10: 07 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Well, yes ... and the whole (supposedly) country to pray for Putin
      Among my entourage, not one person who supports the policy of our government ... both in the north and in the Kuban - one hiss in his direction.
      Those who are near the feeder, with two hands for GDP

      In the not distant past, I earned a living by a taxi, the presidential election took place ... he drove one official to the airport, he admitted to me that he would vote for GDP - only because only with it you can steal so with impunity !!!!
      That's the whole story ...

      I know now they will fly "truth-loves" of minuses to throw ... and by ...
      Tired of being silent. How much can snot chew in the kitchens?
      It's time to speak loudly about trouble !!!!!!!
      1. Disant 28 October 2015 03: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        and what, now the revelations of the “official from the airport” will weave personally to the president? this is where he blurted out his sacred thoughts, and he had to be planted in the middle of the road, and not to conduct shurymurs with him in my own way. the next time he would think whether to break a mitt.
        I’m tired of being silent about it - so go ahead, take the helm and go forward, lead, criticize, break it.
        right now, I’ll just rub the snot and go to you, I’ll stand with the flag nearby. you look, and roll slowly along the tracks of an
    2. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 02: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: KGB WATCH YOU
      But we have 89.9%,

      While this is higher than the dollar, no one will lift a finger ... laughing
      1. Disant 28 October 2015 04: 10 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        as the character of Mikhalkova from the Ural dumplings said
        - in my opinion it smelled again
        1. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 04: 46 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Disant
          - in my opinion it smelled again

          With a smile about serious ..
  15. Monster_Fat 27 October 2015 07: 41 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Glazyev is a smart man, but no one will embody his ideas. Firstly: no one will destroy the existing and worked out "vertical" of power, which does not rest on qualifications and professionalism, but on personal "trust" and "patronage", and secondly: there is no one to embody these ideas, there are no fresh passionate personnel like on the middle link, and at the very bottom of managers, the initiative is "killed in the bud." thirdly: all the money in Russia is not in Russian banks, but invested in Western “valuable” PAPERS and even the gold that the Central Bank buys is in Western banks and is not being brought to Russia, so the “West” has direct leverage to our economy through the financial sector. fourthly: the “fifth” column is very strong and you cannot do without returning to the “37th year” and understanding this really scares everyone, from a simple worker to the highest boss, and this fear “breaks” any desire to change something Fifth: in fact ... no one wants change, because they fear for their little "full" world and fear instability similar to the "90s" ... sixth: we do not live in " vacuum "and surrounded by" sworn partners "who will try their best so that Russia does not gain strength and power, and so on, can be listed indefinitely ....
    1. sa-ag 27 October 2015 08: 01 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      no one wants change, because they fear for their little "full" world and fear instability similar to the "90th years" ...,

      “Maybe there is a homespun truth in this?” (C) Vasisualiy Lokhankin
      1. Disant 28 October 2015 04: 27 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        and what is this?
        there is no discovery in this
        did someone want to jump?
  16. Neophyte 27 October 2015 08: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Is GDP too cautious to change “horses at the crossing”? Something is being done, the cart is creeping and so on! It is unlikely that we will hear about changes in the economy in the near future - everything is too tied up at the highest echelons of power!
  17. anip 27 October 2015 08: 38 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Quote: Neophyte
    It is unlikely that we will hear about changes in the economy in the near future - everything is too tied to the highest echelons of power!

    Already heard in 2012 (and indeed already about 15 years, or even more):
    1. anip 27 October 2015 08: 39 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      And nothing changes, but apparently, therefore:
      1. BMW
        BMW 27 October 2015 14: 45 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Type of observer?
        1. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 16: 53 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: bmw
          Type of observer?
          Not better:

          Putin - “Chubais and his associates made many mistakes in the 90s, but they managed to radically change the structure of the economy. I believe that he, and a number of those people who worked with him then, of course, made many mistakes. And a certain image formed, but someone had to do what they did. They changed the whole structure of the Russian economy and essentially changed the pace of development. "
          http://vz.ru/news/2013/4/25/630312.html
  18. Wise Kaa 27 October 2015 08: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Glazyev’s ideas are good, and finally, after 25 years, the authorities came to understand that the country and republics of the former USSR were controlled from the outside with the help of the financial and credit system and seemed to have come up with their own system, but who would fight the traitors who settled in key posts . Glazyev himself says he lacks decisiveness.
    1. Karabanov 27 October 2015 09: 18 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Wise Kaa
      and finally, after 25 years, the authorities came to understand that the country and republics of the former USSR were controlled from the outside with the help of the financial and credit system and seemed to come up with their own system

      Understanding? Who? No, I have not heard ...
      The trouble is that Glazyev and the like are not just the authorities. They simply will not be allowed to do this; there are completely different selection criteria. A system of devotion to the existing order and commitment to uphold the current policy has been developed. Others simply will not be allowed into power or to take concrete decisions.
      Quote: Wise Kaa
      but who will fight with the traitors who settled in key posts.

      The answer to this question stems from the answer above. They cannot bite off their own head.
      Do you believe in miracles? Me not.
      1. Wise Kaa 27 October 2015 09: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Then it turns out that this is all foreign policy: the struggle with the United States, the war in Ukraine, the war in Syria is nothing more than a picture (fiction) for domestic consumption, both in Russia and in the United States and Europe. Clinton said: "We WILL ALLOW Russia to be great." That allows =)
        1. Karabanov 27 October 2015 10: 07 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          A successfully pursued foreign policy, supported by the majority (including me), lacquers and sets off the deep domestic problems that the state hurts.
          Power is really beneficial, because reorient the attention of the public and the emphasis shifts in a direction favorable to them. But such a system is vicious, and sooner or later it begins to crumble. This is what we observe in modern society.
          How does the government manage to talk about its patriotism, greatness and revival of Russia, and at the same time betray and sell it daily? Is something not communicating here? Some kind of cognitive dissonance turns out ...
          At the exit, we get characters like the legitimately elected - Khoroshavin or Gaiser.
          It turns out people going to power are preoccupied with other interests than the popularly voiced slogans. Fashion for patriotism.
          Such a system should not be, but as we see it, it really exists.
  19. Hardy 27 October 2015 08: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As for the economy, everything was discussed in great detail and fairly skillfully at the Moscow Economic Forum.
  20. akudr48 27 October 2015 09: 55 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    When the crooks and thieves in power are mentioned, they forget about their intellectual service staff, all these devils from the HSE, economic lice that crawled out in 1991, occupied the entire economic leadership of the country, and continue to drink blood.

    They used to be gaydarochubais, they explained privatization and the free market arm (with which they cleared the pockets of USSR citizens), but today they are naibulin with grefs and other ulyukaevs, they stupidly wait for high prices for a barrel (which will not help), but they provide a continuation of the thieves banquet at the expense of the Russian people and the ongoing destruction of Russia (rising taxes, utilities, food and gas prices, falling pensions, medicine and education, etc.).

    This audience, with their smaller assistants, is now raging in spitting on the report of Glazyev and himself, the figure that he hates, not shying away from lies, distortions, cheap demagogy and other vile tricks.

    But the question is not even in them, the dog barks, the wind wears.
    The question is in our clear sun, whether in a rower, or as a helmsman, or in a coachman, or in a Siberian Crane, he has many faces.

    Is it all ours on Olympus itself that understands what is happening, what way lice show and route to it, where the cart is rolling and will soon roll, it’s interesting to know, especially in Syria and Donbass.

    But this is not given to know, or rather, I don’t want to know, it’s better to continue to crawl, all the more it will not immediately strike and it will be clear only by the results where the country will be, although many know the answer by simple calculation of the cart trajectory according to the laws of physics.
    1. Karabanov 27 October 2015 10: 35 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Great comment!
      But you know ... I noticed that many (and maybe most) like this inert existence. They are satisfied with scolding local municipal bureaucrats and bosses, cursing them for their corruption and hypocrisy, grumbling with drool and talking about justice!
      At the same time, pretend to be a super-patriot and chant - Glory to Putin! They think little that this system is ubiquitous and permeated at all levels (as is fashionable today - the vertical of power).
      Although, in truth, even the local bureaucratic crooks are just “innocent lambs,” compared to those “druzhiks” that occur in the upper echelons. But to think about it, and even more so to say, it seems somehow not accepted ... You risk becoming a sworn enemy and traitor from the 5th column.
  21. Gardamir 27 October 2015 11: 08 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    What are you all arguing about. It was said a few years ago, but nothing has changed since then.

    appreciate his words. He is not interested in the people, Russia. The investment process itself is important to him for the sake of investment.
  22. 123321 27 October 2015 11: 24 New
    • -7
    • 0
    -7
    Invitation to the all-Russian action on November 4: March in support of the policy of Vladimir Putin


  23. Governor 27 October 2015 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I wonder who Putin is? Rower or Siberian Crane? Putin is the governor general of a colony called the Russian Federation.
    And Glazyev’s projects are regular breakfasts for the most naive.
  24. Papin 27 October 2015 11: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Glazyev, Starikov, Prokhanov, etc. smart things are SPEAKED but only talked about.
    Yes, there are many patriots now.
    But what is happening to Mukhin is actually regrettable. It would be interesting to hear the opinion of the above respected people about what is happening now with Mr. Mukhin for his ideas.
    And liberalism here and there does not smell.
  25. marc75 27 October 2015 11: 53 New
    • -9
    • 0
    -9
    Glazyev is a theorist who did not realize any of his crazy ideas in life !!! Does he want to print money? And to reinforce them with what? To print money you need to produce something, and this is speculation! For money you need to buy goods, not money, but we do not produce goods. The people will get rich, horror ... Everything will settle in the banks, we will get loans, because the refinancing rate is not reduced, so the loans will be expensive, therefore, a small business in the ass! Until the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is nationalized and untied from the dollar, everything is in vain.
    1. Hardy 27 October 2015 12: 15 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: marc75
      To print money you need to produce something, and this is speculation!

      Glazyev offers the same thing that Primakov did in 1998. When in a few months a significant breakthrough was made in the economy. That is, these Glazyev proposals have been tested in practice not only in other states, but also with us.
      If enterprises are deprived not only of loans, but even of working capital, then how will they produce products?
      In our country, industry is specifically destroyed under the guise of sanctions and the global crisis. For this, they are doing the world crisis in order to destroy competitors and buy everything at a cheap price. And our leadership is actively involved in this speculative scheme ...
      1. marc75 27 October 2015 12: 47 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        But who is stopping now from taking loans at 25%? Or do you think banks with an increase in money supply will lower the rate? It’s naive to think so, I repeat the Central Bank rate is very high. All this will work only when the Central Bank lowers the rate to 2-3%, against the current 12%. In Europe, the ECB rate is 0,05%, consumer loans are 3% per annum, it is profitable to take, the economy is developing. We have a Central Bank rate of 12%, loans are issued from 22 to 40% per annum. While the Central Bank of the Russian Federation will be a branch of the Fed, all in vain.
      2. marc75 27 October 2015 12: 50 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Forgot to add for example! Sberbank. the bank in its branches in Poland provides consumer loans at 3%, in Russia at 25%. What is it like?
  26. Wolka 27 October 2015 12: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I'm not a financier, but something internal tells me that Glazyev is right, and that water does not flow under a lying stone ...
  27. 123321 27 October 2015 12: 25 New
    • -6
    • 0
    -6
    Quote: 123321
    Invitation to the all-Russian action on November 4: March in support of the policy of Vladimir Putin



    Stop sitting at home and wait for things to get worse! Support the president now, give him the authority to clean up the traitors in power! A rally is a vote. Each person alone will not decide anything, but together we can change everything!
    Or are you waiting for shells and bombs to whistle over your house, as in Syria, Libya, Ukraine?
    1. Pulya 27 October 2015 14: 24 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      And what is stopping him at the moment ???????
      What other authority does he need ?????????

      March for the fool ...
      1. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 03: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Pulya
        March for the fool ...

        A sucked holiday was made from a finger, they came up with a difficultly small date-justification ..
    2. Karabanov 27 October 2015 14: 31 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: 123321
      Support the president now, give him the authority to clean up the traitors in power!

      And who took these powers from him?
      1. afdjhbn67 28 October 2015 03: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Karabanov
        And who took these powers from him?

        But we have 89.9%, if you understand what I mean

        like the answer .. laughing
    3. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 15: 08 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: 123321
      Support the president now, give him the authority to clean up the traitors in power! A rally is a vote. Each person alone will not decide anything, but together we can change everything!

      Honestly fool

      Quote: Karabanov
      A system of devotion to the existing order and commitment to uphold the current policy has been developed. Others simply will not be allowed into power or to take concrete decisions.


      Quote: Wise Kaa
      but who will fight with the traitors who settled in key posts.


      Quote: Karabanov
      The answer to this question stems from the answer above. They cannot bite off their own head.
      Do you believe in miracles? Me not.
  28. mikh-korsakov 27 October 2015 12: 43 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    I reject any attempts to reproach the president for corruption or aiding corruption. The logic of the supporters of this does not exceed the logic of the grandmothers sitting at the entrance, that is, the absence of any logic. All the transformations outlined by Glazyev are true and are not some kind of planetary discovery. Individually, they have been tried in many countries. So what's the deal? I believe that the matter is not in Nabiulina and the status of the Central Bank. The President is whistling now, and the Duma will amend the constitution about the Central Bank, and Nabiullina, and she is not dura, the next day will begin to do what she is told, or resign. Case, I think. in corruption of officials. which permeated the entire state, most likely, at the beginning of the Glazyev transformations, they will become in an acceptable posture, begin to speak. that they themselves wanted it, but were afraid to say it aloud. They themselves will bring the matter to the point of absurdity, as it was at the beginning of perestroika, (quite reasonable things were initially proposed) and overwhelm the whole thing. That is, the question is where to get several thousand honest, smart and competent officials (nestlings ... Putin). So far it seems that officials have taken up the correction, but where to find them to replace?
    1. marc75 27 October 2015 13: 31 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Well, the king cannot be good, but the retinue is bad. Everyone works as a team, all decisions are made in concert. It’s just really hard to fight corruption when you head it!
      1. Pulya 27 October 2015 14: 31 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Absolutely.
        If you take into account, all this retinue, he himself appointed to the posts, around himself ... and then hung out from place to place ... for more convincing.
      2. asiat_61 28 October 2015 01: 13 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        If you cannot defeat corruption, you need to lead it.
    2. Pulya 27 October 2015 14: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The fish rots from the head !!!
      Old Russian wisdom ...
      If it’s not clear, read it one more time.
    3. Karabanov 27 October 2015 14: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      I reject any attempts to reproach the president for corruption or aiding corruption.

      I liked your answer and the reasoning in it is sensible. But what is this too sugary, loyal position based on? This is akin to religion, built on some new dogmas.
      And defending this "religion", you do not allow the idea that sincerely loving (as you can see) and wishing prosperity to your native country, you can suddenly be deliberately mistaken?
      1. mikh-korsakov 27 October 2015 15: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        My position is not loyal, personally, I am not familiar with Putin, except that he, being the vice-rector of LSU in St. Petersburg, kicked me out of the office when I wanted to ask him where the archive is. The logic of my position is based on the fact that Putin is now essentially the master of the Russian land, that is, everything is HIS, he is smart enough to understand that not only our liberals are under the spotlight. but also foreign intelligence. Therefore, direct lobbying of other people's interests is fatal to him. Ask a question. and what prevents him from putting things in order. Answer: corruption as an octopus has penetrated into all pores, but the main thing is where to find honest and competent replacements. This is a piece goods. I am ready to believe that 90% of initially honest people who are near money are gradually being drawn into corruption by the corrupt. In a word, there are few Katani commissars. They will object to me. But what about other countries. They call China: do not tell my slippers, there the thief is shot in batches. In the USA, lobbying is a professional affair and comes at a price in the value of contracts. In Germany: I worked there under a contract and saw a lot of things.
    4. BMW
      BMW 27 October 2015 15: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      So far it seems that officials have taken up the correction, but where to find them to replace?

      Yes, only
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      Whistle Now President

      You won’t wait, because the whistle, either rusted or rotted and was scrapped.
    5. Hardy 27 October 2015 18: 15 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      I reject any attempts to reproach the president for corruption or aiding corruption. The logic of the supporters of this does not exceed the logic of the grandmothers sitting at the entrance, that is, the absence of any logic.

      Of course, Putin personally is not interested in loot, but in power. And of course it’s more pleasant for him to manage a superpower than, for example, the Leningrad Region. Well, he also has a careful attitude to the participants of the Second World War since childhood.

      This is where Putin’s wishes end and arithmetic begins to work. He is a politician, he has to take into account different forces and interests. The people give him sufficient support. But officials and business (including transnational) have to be fed, for free they will not tolerate it.

      It is quite possible to remove corruption with the modern development of technology. It is necessary to make open on the Internet the activities of officials, including the cash flows of public funds. Introduce a check-in system for assessing work not from higher authorities, but from citizens. For example, the pit was not closed for a week on the road, dissatisfied citizens put down the minuses and the official quits. There would be a desire, but to realize direct civilian control is quite possible, there would be a desire.
      But the president is apparently more convenient and easier to negotiate with a narrow circle of influential people than to appease the people.
      He saved Russia from complete collapse and for that he is honored and respected. Even increased the territory, and thank you very much for that. While loot with oil was not greedy, he shared with people. But he doesn’t want to completely bet on people ...
      Personally, I understand him, the love of the people is changeable, especially well-fed and not intimidated. And the swamp showed it, although at that time they didn’t live badly (in any case, it was not the poorest who participated in the protests) ... Maybe he now teaches us that, who knows him)))
      But the current situation in the economy is very difficult and he will still have to take some measures. Let's hope that he has a plan)))) It’s not in vain that Glazyev was released on Channel 1 and other statesmen were being pulled up.
      And let's not forget, Putin is a liberal, incl. Especially you can not really hope))))
      1. Uncle Joe 27 October 2015 18: 22 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: Hardy
        He saved Russia from complete collapse
        In the sense that the collapse of Russia thanks to Putin was incomplete? lol

        And when she fell apart do not remind?

        Even the territory increased
        Yeah - pre-subsract.
        1. Hardy 27 October 2015 19: 27 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Quote: Uncle Joe
          Quote: Hardy
          He saved Russia from complete collapse
          In the sense that the collapse of Russia thanks to Putin was incomplete? lol

          At the time of his coming to power, Chechnya already de jure left the Russian Federation. Tatarstan de facto left; taxes were not paid to the treasury. In Yakutia with a passport of the Russian Federation without paying a fee was not allowed. Yes, in fact, everywhere there were specific princes who did not obey anyone and created complete arbitrariness.
          How he managed to agree with them, I can’t imagine. But managed. And without blood. And apparently this agreement is still in force, in any case, it can explain a lot ...
          And do not forget Putin not only returned the Crimea, but also the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. Now he has taken up the North Pole and is generally picking it up slowly along the perimeter.
          If this is not enough, then tell me, who has done more for Russia?
          But how he is going to move the country further, relying on the liberals, is not clear ... Loot (liberal idea) of people can be united only if it is a gang that is engaged in robbery. A sustainable creative social system cannot be built on the idea of ​​insatiable consumerism.
          1. Uncle Joe 28 October 2015 00: 57 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Hardy
            At the time of his coming to power, Chechnya de jure left the Russian Federation
            Chechnya de jure became part of the Russian Federation only after the signing of the Khasavyurt agreement, and did not go anywhere else.

            Tatarstan de facto didn’t go anywhere (although it had both the reasons and all the possibilities for this), and not wanting to act as a donor, held a referendum, and periodically blackmailing the center with a threat of exit, bargained for more independence.
            And he didn’t pay taxes much worse than the others, as you can easily find out from the report of the Ministry of Finance "On the results of the federal budget in 1999", in the table "debt on tax payments to the federal budget" - http://www.minfin.ru/en /document/index.php?id_4=5060

            Debt,% of proceeds:
            Moscow region - 174%
            Republic of Tatarstan - 276%
            Chelyabinsk region - 173%
            Nizhny Novgorod region. - 157%
            Kemerovo region. - 307%
            Sverdlovsk region. - 179%

            But something does not occur to anyone to talk about the actual separation of the Moscow or Kemerovo region.

            The tale about Yakutia is also well known, but does not have any factual evidence. If we recall that the phased replacement of USSR passports with Russian passports only began on October 1, 1997 (I changed my passport only in 2003), and that even in 2000, most of the Russian population had Soviet passports ...

            How he managed to agree with them, I can’t imagine
            And do not imagine, since there is nothing to imagine.
            These are tales of non-existent achievements, designed for lazy poorly educated naivets who never begin to check propaganda statements.

            And do not forget Putin not only returned Crimea
            A dubious achievement is to sign, violating a bunch of international agreements and thereby allowing the so-called ATO (with all that it implies), after which you pledge yourself and call the partners of the ATO initiators, whom he previously called the junta.
            And on the other side of the territorial scales - islands, shelf, and a village with Russian citizens, given to the Crimea.

            If this is not enough, then tell me, who has done more for Russia?
            If you believe the words of Putin, then Yeltsin, Chubais and Gaidar (he and Medvedev in 2nd place, the post-war leadership of the USSR in 3rd)

            But how he is going to move the country further on relying on liberals is not clear
            Same as before.

  29. Tomich2
    Tomich2 27 October 2015 13: 56 New
    • -6
    • 0
    -6
    eyeless stupid person what to look for
  30. marc75 27 October 2015 14: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: marc75
    Glazyev is a theorist who did not realize any of his crazy ideas in life !!! Does he want to print money? And to reinforce them with what? To print money you need to produce something, and this is speculation! For money you need to buy goods, not money, but we do not produce goods. The people will get rich, horror ... Everything will settle in the banks, we will get loans, because the refinancing rate is not reduced, so the loans will be expensive, therefore, a small business in the ass! Until the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is nationalized and untied from the dollar, everything is in vain.

    Here is an interesting logic for those who set the minus, i.e. let the Central Bank be a branch of the Fed, and the national currency dollar? By your logic so!
  31. Straight 27 October 2015 16: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It’s time for Putin to nominate Glazyev for the post of Prime Minister of the Russian Federation! Enough to delve into this liberal trash. It's time to do things, oh, we're already late ...
  32. Vlad5307 27 October 2015 18: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: bmw
    A specific stagnation has not yet begun, so that it can still be corrected and painlessly.

    This is not stagnation, it is stagnation of the economy! The methods proposed by Glazyev should work, partly these methods were tested by the government of E. Primakov and worked perfectly - the GDP growth amounted to 20% and this is right after the 90s! True, against the background of an almost complete collapse of the economy, but now 7% would not hurt us at all! And the brains need to be corrected by our government, which only deals with what is holding back the economy, eating up an incompetent supply of the national fund, which is only left for 2016. But I think the "partners" will hurry to unpack it at the beginning of 2016. They worked out a method - the brains of liberal economists are in place and ready for action, and they are already working! hi