Yemeni military sank the ship of the Arab coalition near the port of Moha on the Red Sea

The Yemeni military, loyal to the former president of the country Ali Abdullah Saleh, managed to sink one of the ships of the Arab coalition in the area of ​​the port of Moh on the Red Sea.




“Parts of the Yemeni army fired a rocket in the direction of one of the warships from which the port of Moha was fired. The goal was accurately hit and sunk ", - quotes the words of a military source agency Sputnik RIA "News".

It is noted that this is already the third message in the current month about the destruction of the coalition ships of the Arab countries by forces loyal to Saleh.

Armed conflict continues in Yemen with the participation of the Hussite rebels from the Shiite Ansar Alla movement and the military loyal to the former President Ali Abdullah Saleh on the one hand, and the troops of the ousted President Abd Rabbu Mansur Hadi, supported by the Arab coalition led by Saudi Arabia - with other.
Photos used:
http://img.112.ua
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech 26 October 2015 07: 26 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    “Parts of the Yemeni army fired a rocket in the direction of one of the warships from which the port of Mokh was fired. The target was precisely hit and sunk. "


    What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ... and also what kind of ship and when did this happen?
    1. hydrox 26 October 2015 07: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: The same Lech
      “Parts of the Yemeni army fired a rocket in the direction of one of the warships from which the port of Mokh was fired. The target was precisely hit and sunk. "

      What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ... and also what kind of ship and when did this happen?


      The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.
      But it’s good that we are not there and there will be no reason to say that "Putin is to blame."
      1. Alexander Romanov 26 October 2015 07: 45 New
        • 26
        • 0
        +26
        Quote: hydrox

        The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.

        From Scud, you sweat to hit the ship
        1. dmi.pris 26 October 2015 08: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Of course not Scud, but there are enough different weapons from around the world, of course, our small one.
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: hydrox

          The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.

          From Scud, you sweat to hit the ship
          1. GDP
            GDP 26 October 2015 10: 07 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            If there was a hit then most likely with a termite, from a line or a missile boat - this is the most common missile among the Arabs ... Of course it is outdated, but it is still capable of letting even the destroyer to the bottom, from a distance of 70 km ...
            Although, of course, it is possible that they simply fired at some boat from the PTRK. Arabs love to inflate out of molehills ...
            1. mvg
              mvg 26 October 2015 12: 10 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              In the Arab-Israeli war, the Arabs never hit the P-15 on the boats of the Jews .. and in the coastal version I don’t know them .. so, most likely they sunk a motor boat from the ATGM .. This is at best .. Now, if if a Saudi frigate got any thread to the bottom, this would be news .. pleasant ..
              1. Talgat 26 October 2015 18: 25 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Hurray and vivat "Husits"! Drowned the ship of the Saudis - obscurantists! That's what they need!

                My sympathies are completely on the side of these freedom fighters - they are fighting the medieval Islamists, the USA and the West
      2. Now we are free 26 October 2015 08: 35 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Greetings hydrox hi
        Quote: hydrox
        The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.

        With such epaulettes and such writing? .. And what is not "Poplar" or "Yars"? wassat

        There is no photo for the news, but most likely under the proud name -SHIP- was meant the maximum of the Republic of Kazakhstan that could be destroyed from the ATGM (The Egyptian military boat was similarly destroyed)
        Yes, and near Mariupol (Air conditioning flopped) at the border junta of the Junta probably in the same way ...
        1. 33 Watcher 26 October 2015 09: 26 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          We all gentlemen, underestimated the firepower of air conditioners wink
        2. Good me 26 October 2015 11: 06 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Now we are free
          With such epaulettes and such writing? .. And what is not "Poplar" or "Yars"?


          Not epaulets paint a person ...

          Quote: Now we are free
          Yes, and near Mariupol (Air conditioning flopped) at the border junta of the Junta probably in the same way ...


          If you mean the undermining of the boat almost on the roads of Mariupol, then in general, the story is muddy. There, the juntaans were most likely blown up on their own air conditioner.

          But there was another example when, next to Novoazovsk, fire from the shore, militias another boat was sunk.
          So there is real, "shmalnuli" rocket. Something like this repeat

      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. just exp 26 October 2015 08: 37 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        But how to shoot at the ships?
      5. arane 26 October 2015 09: 43 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: hydrox
        Quote: The same Lech
        “Parts of the Yemeni army fired a rocket in the direction of one of the warships from which the port of Mokh was fired. The target was precisely hit and sunk. "

        What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ... and also what kind of ship and when did this happen?


        The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.
        But it’s good that we are not there and there will be no reason to say that "Putin is to blame."

        Well, you can sink a ship, of course, but you can get there ..... only by chance, this is from a series of military oddities
      6. Thronekeeper 26 October 2015 09: 47 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The Exocet clone is Sino-Iranian most likely. Hezbollah recaptured such an Israeli frigate in 2006. That was lucky, got into the helicopter and flashed through it. These are out of luck.
      7. mvg
        mvg 26 October 2015 12: 04 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The super-duper Scud missile, with the light hand of the hydrox, is now in the anti-ship version. Do you even think when you write? It’s difficult to get into the CITY by a skad. What am I talking about ...
    2. GELEZNII_KAPUT 26 October 2015 07: 51 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: The same Lech
      What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ... and also what kind of ship and when did this happen?

      Yes there is some trash from sludge in Kuwait campaign, the previous "Al Mahrousa" was from there! Not a rocket ship, so probably not far from the coast! hi
      1. Denis_469 26 October 2015 09: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        previous "Al Mahrousa"

        It is October 10th which? Did I understand the 2nd attack correctly?
    3. demo 26 October 2015 07: 53 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Never mind.
      The main thing is that the Arabs adopted the “best traditions” of our fellow Ukrainians.
      Those flew off, and these are melted away. Or move away?
      1. Andrea 26 October 2015 08: 06 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, the first is more true ... laughing
    4. VP
      VP 26 October 2015 08: 32 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Most likely, they got a boat from the ATGM
    5. FID
      FID 26 October 2015 08: 48 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: The same Lech
      What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ..

      I'm afraid to make a mistake, but ... 3A51, I think (this is a designation on autopilot, how the rocket itself is called, I don’t know).
    6. Denis_469 26 October 2015 09: 00 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Near the coast. Who was there is not yet known. A photo of the result of the attack from the shore here: http://sovpl.forum24.ru/?1-1-0-00000458-000-160-0#133

      Of the 3 attacks, only 1 dead Saudi ship was installed: http://sovpl.forum24.ru/?1-1-0-00000460-000-0-0#000
    7. chunga-changa 26 October 2015 14: 08 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ...

      Near Mariupol, last summer, there was a similar case.
  2. Mahmut 26 October 2015 07: 27 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Handsome men however
  3. SANAY 26 October 2015 07: 28 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    But there was no need to bomb other people's weddings. And secondly, people defend their homeland.
  4. mojohed2012 26 October 2015 07: 29 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Yes. questions, questions.
    And my question is: is not the coalition of Arab countries fighting for the runaway president of Yemen? Did not the Saudis begin a military operation against the Howsites in support of just this character? Or are the troops no longer loyal to that president and support the Howsites against the coalition and the president?
    1. hydrox 26 October 2015 07: 40 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: mojohed2012
      Or are the troops no longer loyal to that president and support the Howsites against the coalition and the president?


      There to figure out what the hell to break.
      I won’t be surprised that the Americans had a hand in it, leaving there ISIS saved from Syria ...
    2. Omskgasmyas 26 October 2015 07: 54 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      As in a solid state like UkRuiny, in Yemen 2 is a semi-legitimate resident. One escaped to the SA and tries to return to the throne with the help of the invaders, the other with the help of the Hussites and Iran, they try not to be eaten by their escaping resident and fair Wahhabis and successfully resist this Arabian callolition.
    3. 33 Watcher 26 October 2015 09: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      A runaway Hadi came to power through a velvet revolution paid by you know who. Saleh was overthrown, but his supporters remained in the army. Which united with the Shiite tribes, which in turn are monarchists, and kicked out of the country, the puppet president Hadi, for whom the coalition is now fighting, and part of the Yemeni army loyal to him.
      Fuh, while writing, he almost got confused laughing In short, everyone is at war with everyone, there is Al Qaeda there, whose role is not clear laughing
  5. Sorokin 26 October 2015 07: 37 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: mojohed2012
    Yes. questions, questions.
    And my question is: is not the coalition of Arab countries fighting for the runaway president of Yemen? Did not the Saudis begin a military operation against the Howsites in support of just this character? Or are the troops no longer loyal to that president and support the Howsites against the coalition and the president?

    There, in my opinion, no one already understands what and for whom it is fighting. The chaos in America was a success.
  6. Wolka 26 October 2015 07: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it’s valid, descends, the Yankees with their 6th fleet will no longer tuck close to the coast, and the Saudis with their coalition forward science ...
  7. sa-ag 26 October 2015 07: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "mosquito" fleet on both sides
  8. Mountain shooter 26 October 2015 07: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    So the “poor coalition” does not have enough ships. No matter how much money you have, warships are not sold at car dealerships; losses are made up for a long and difficult time. You can say - the failure of this adventure, with the reduction of Yemen to humility - is just around the corner.
  9. Zomanus 26 October 2015 08: 07 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Yes, they constantly fight there, this is the norm for them.
    The fact that they deprived the people of all recognized power,
    comes around for the Saudis with a large hemorrhoid in their rear.
    I feel that perhaps soon the Saudis will have to fight with IS on their territory.
  10. Maxom75 26 October 2015 08: 14 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    No one pointed out that parts of the Yemeni army sank a ship firing at the port of Yemen. So what should they meet with his flowers? Or bread and salt? As part of the regular army, they did what they had to do. Well done protect their country.
  11. Sars 26 October 2015 08: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They write that the third Saudi ship has sunk! And one Egyptian got hit by a rocket, but remained afloat.
    1. Denis_469 26 October 2015 09: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: SarS
      They write that the third Saudi ship has sunk! And one Egyptian got hit by a rocket, but remained afloat.

      No, there were only 3 attacks. Tell me about your information about the sunken and damaged Egyptian. By name.
      1. Sars 26 October 2015 10: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I will not tell you by the names of the first two ships, there was no information.
  12. alexander 2 26 October 2015 08: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: hydrox
    Quote: The same Lech
    “Parts of the Yemeni army fired a rocket in the direction of one of the warships from which the port of Mokh was fired. The target was precisely hit and sunk. "

    What kind of rocket and at what distance was the target ... and also what kind of ship and when did this happen?


    The missiles are ours, maybe Scud.
    But it’s good that we are not there and there will be no reason to say that "Putin is to blame."

    But in other cases, did they need grounds for accusation? Soon Russia and Putin will be blamed for the solar eclipse.
  13. Polite Moose 26 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Any success of the Yemeni warriors is an extra nail in the ass of the Saudis. And +50 to Russian diplomacy in BV. Because Now for the SA, a nightmare is Russian help to the Yemeni peasants, who, as reported in the article, can launch ships to the bottom. The Saudis did not live in peace in the region. No, it was necessary for IG to stir up, equip and finance together with the amers. Now let Assad be skinned. They will feel what it is like to fight with partisans armed with modern weapons. I believe that with further, more significant successes of the Yemenis, it is quite possible to exchange the refusal of Russian support for Yemen to the refusal of the SA to support IS.
    1. Stirbjorn 26 October 2015 09: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      But are we providing military assistance to Yemeni rebels? How interesting? ports are blocked, airports too. request Only without any mysterious winks))
      1. Polite Moose 26 October 2015 09: 49 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        But are we providing military assistance to Yemeni rebels? How interesting? ports are blocked, airports too. request Only without any mysterious winks))


        We render, we do not render. Hard to say. It is likely that both. No one is recognized. Yes, this is, in general, not important. The important thing is that we CAN provide such support. How? These are the details. Moose trails will always be found.
        Even if the amount of assistance is 5-10% of the Syrian, the Saudis will be very painful. And, I think, they understand this well.
  14. kartalovkolya 26 October 2015 08: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yemenis are burning the vaunted American Abrams, now they have switched to the “camel’s” ship (although the weblogs are also called the “desert ship”, but in any case the news deserves attention), and as a result the Persian Gulf seems to be closed soon and more and more begins to appear US goal (interests of American oil companies above all)!
  15. Salad 26 October 2015 08: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Qatar's talking head, recently, wanted to enter Syria, a third world scarecrow. In fact, the whole Arab coalition in Yemen is stuck
  16. 31rus 26 October 2015 09: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Scuds”, Yemenis use it correctly on air force bases, not long ago there was a message about the death of a general, heaps of airplanes and helicopters, so to speak retaliation for bombing peaceful cities, the Saudis shot down three, two or three missed, from the launch of 12 missiles, it turns out 6 accurately flew and hit, here is another question where the vaunted "Patriot", and our "Armor", either they are not there, or the Saudis are full deb @ silts, it's not the first shelling
    1. mvg
      mvg 26 October 2015 12: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In more detail, about Shells and ballistic missiles ... What, now Shells and ballistics are "jammed" ??? Oh how! The Americans with their “Thadam’s” SM-3 Block 2, and the “Patriots” have a rest .. We (the Saudis) have universal air defense systems that equally easily fight the enemy’s manpower and the Kyrgyz Republic and the BRRS .. Cheeks - bunches ..
      It was necessary for the Arab to write this in the instructions when selling complexes, otherwise they, poor fellows, do not know about it ..
  17. slizhov 26 October 2015 09: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Poor USA !!!
    All of them are fucking horns!
  18. Zaurbek 26 October 2015 10: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The submarine fluttered
    1. Mikhail Krapivin 26 October 2015 11: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      After which she said - I serve Russia and went under the Russian Anthem to the depth;)
  19. Kyrgyz 26 October 2015 12: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The tank will be picked up by a bunch of photos and here is the “WAR”, and just two lines))) do not tell, the fisherman was left without work at best