In the Navy may appear units of full-time "opponents"

44
Special units, whose task will be to perform the functions of a probable enemy during exercises, may appear in the states of the Russian Navy, reports RIA News message from the head of the combat training department fleet Victor Kochemazov.



"There are already thoughts about creating special staff units that will work in the combat training system for the enemy on a full-time basis and participate in all exercises, already fully working on the tactics of those countries that can probably be considered as an opponent in that or another situation ",
The rear admiral told Ekho Moskvy.

Currently, the role of the enemy is performed by the combat units of the fleet, he noted.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +34
    25 October 2015 10: 41
    and here is the work for the fifth column wassat
    1. +18
      25 October 2015 10: 45
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      and here is the work for the fifth column wassat

      You took it right off the tongue, and the interview was on the State Department’s Echo. laughing
    2. +13
      25 October 2015 10: 46
      And what is not a bad idea ... And in videoconferencing, you need to create such! Let them suddenly "attack" and keep them in constant combat readiness! We cannot relax in Russia now! And take the most experienced ones there.
      1. +18
        25 October 2015 10: 48
        I would have created a bribe-taker structure. Introduce it specially into all structures and catch in fact.
        1. +3
          25 October 2015 12: 16
          Quote: AdekvatNICK
          I would have created a bribe-taker structure.



          What little acting seemed ???
          1. 0
            25 October 2015 14: 56
            we have eradicated corruption and are in the top three countries where corruption is low?
      2. +8
        25 October 2015 10: 50
        If we go to the terminology of martial arts - "sparring partners"?
      3. +20
        25 October 2015 10: 57
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And take the most experienced there

        And arm them with trophy weapons. Aircraft carriers and Virginia-class nuclear submarines laughing
      4. +12
        25 October 2015 11: 18
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And what is not a bad idea ... And in videoconferencing, you need to create such! Let them suddenly "attack" and keep them in constant combat readiness! We cannot relax in Russia now! And take the most experienced ones there.

        I am tormented by vague doubts about the justification of such a step, specifically for the fleet - if you use the Yankees tactics - attack with axes from extreme distances and the use of AOG - then there’s nothing to imitate, but to separate a separate submarine from the fleet to simulate an attack, if any, more than meager amounts - it makes no sense.
        Aviation is another matter - the Yankes still have the "Aggressor" squadron, but we lost ours in Turkmenistan in the 90s, that's what exactly needs to be recreated.
        1. +6
          25 October 2015 12: 52
          Quote: lelikas
          I am tormented by vague doubts about the justification of such a move, just for the fleet - if you use the Yankees tactics - attack with axes from extreme distances and the use of AUG - then there’s nothing to imitate

          You don’t understand, in addition to tactics, such an artificial opponent will allow gunsmiths to develop attack weapons and defense weapons to compete. Roughly speaking, RCC Caliber, Uranium, etc. will compete with redoubts and S-300 Fort, etc. etc. Torpedoes with a whole system of countermeasures that exist on our ships ...
          Low-noise submarines with means of detection, such competition in peacetime will give impetus to the development of our weapons. Because gunsmiths whose weapons cannot overcome countermeasures or vice versa cannot repel missiles will be presented with claims that they think they need to change their weapons or means of defense in order to emerge victorious in this situation.
          The main thing is that such exercises should not be simulated, in which our troops will simply have to be 100% victorious when they meet with the enemy forces, the roles of which are our own military. There should be no programmed victories. The defeat in this case should not be regarded as a shame for our Armed Forces, but an opportunity to find out our weaknesses and tactical miscalculations and eliminate them
      5. 0
        25 October 2015 12: 15
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And that is not a bad idea ... And in the VKS such need to be created!



        Well, the Americans regularly conduct "Red Flag" exercises ... And they have our planes, and trained pilots ...

        So - the thing is necessary, and not only in the Navy and in the VKS ....

        PS Only, to be honest, I did not understand what exactly is meant in the Navy - the use of someone like "navy seals" ??? Or some ships, which we already have a shortage of ???
      6. -1
        25 October 2015 13: 25
        Interesting. These structures are interchanging exchanges of butoh hits ... single or combat ...
      7. 0
        25 October 2015 14: 43
        Quote: MIKHAN
        ... and take the most experienced there ..

        Well, as if the most experienced are not always the most able to imitate the enemy, experience sometimes interferes with doing stupidity
    3. Tor5
      +2
      25 October 2015 11: 28
      Very reasonable! By studying the behavior of enemies on the battlefield, and even better with their equipment, you can significantly increase the effectiveness of exercises.
      1. 0
        25 October 2015 12: 00
        Quote: Tor5
        Very reasonable! By studying the behavior of enemies on the battlefield, and even better with their equipment, you can significantly increase the effectiveness of exercises.

        Uh-huh, are we going to fight the Berkov mock-ups without even having our own destroyer?
        It’s better to participate in exercises more often, such as RIMPAK - there the probable enemy himself provides his ships and boats with aircraft carriers - and all in kind - practice maneuvers, direction-finding noises - and that’s just that.
  2. +2
    25 October 2015 10: 47
    The rear admiral told Ekho Moskvy.

    Oh, it’s even become interesting.
  3. +5
    25 October 2015 10: 51
    The idea is not bad, a separate Russian unit operating according to the NATO charters, equipped with Western weapons and equipment will be of great help in training various types of troops in the fight against a potential enemy.
  4. +3
    25 October 2015 10: 55
    I wonder how the entry on the military ID will look like? Served as "a probable enemy on the ship of a probable enemy in the unit No. 4382 of a probable enemy"?
    Not that it was not necessary, but to separate a separate unit ... Especially the Navy. In the US, this was practiced, but on airplanes. And the most important question - do we have ships before figs?
  5. +3
    25 October 2015 10: 56
    The awkward trolling of the Fifth Column on its own "mouthpiece of truth" laughing Would have served with the benefit of the Fatherland not only with language, but also with military deeds, portraying an "adversary" soldier
    And then I remember in my childhood, when they played Zarnitsa, everyone wanted to be for the Reds, but no one for the enemies. And now there is no need to choose - the liberals themselves can do a good job for raising the combat readiness of naval units. Yes, and it is more interesting for the military themselves (albeit at exercises) to "fight" with yrag knowing that they are portrayed not by true patriots, but by the mongrels of the West lol It turns out more realistic laughing
    hi
    1. +2
      25 October 2015 11: 33
      More realistic - is it in the sense of real sink in the end?
      And what, a double benefit. And they will serve, and in the house it will be cleaner after the end of the teachings laughing
  6. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 01
    A similar practice has long existed in the US Armed Forces where special units use the weapons and tactics of a potential enemy. There is a rational grain in this idea and it should be considered ....
    1. +1
      25 October 2015 11: 21
      Quote: ranger
      A similar practice has long existed in the US Armed Forces where special units use the weapons and tactics of a potential enemy. There is a rational grain in this idea and it should be considered ....

      Where to get the weapons of a potential enemy of the Navy. Okay m16, you can also find the Apache, different F-s, abrashka too. Where to get a submarine, an aircraft carrier. Will the Amers give us "Nimitz" Everything that we can find for the Navy, a couple of corvettes made of scrap metal that were released during World War II. request
  7. 0
    25 October 2015 11: 04
    The fifth column is fighting, knowing that there will be nothing for them. And here they scatter through the cracks.
  8. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 05
    Not bad. in fact.
    And you need to take there the most experienced.
    To learn to be even more experienced and better.
  9. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 11
    Organization, armament, tactics of army actions in the armed forces have always been studied. In the exercises, someone always acted as a likely adversary.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 36
    And why not sometimes the Northern Fleet "attack" the Pacific ... or vice versa ???
    1. +2
      25 October 2015 22: 22
      Quote: Roman 57 rus
      And why not sometimes the Northern Fleet "attack" the Pacific ... or vice versa ???

      You do not even guess how close you are to the truth !!!
      I don’t understand why the beginning of the FIGHT is trying to discover America. request
      Even when I was on the ships of the fleet, there was such a practice: the commander of the PLC brigade, in parallel with the division commander of the boats, were handed packages with tasks for the upcoming exercises. Whoever won - received "credit". The loser was subjected to the most severe test, sometimes with organizational conclusions. The stimulus was strongest. Yes
      And also the delivery of L-3 was practiced (when reconstructing the battlefield after factory repair) in the competition of the fleets! The boat is northern, the PLO forces are Baltic, the senior at the crossing is the BrPLPL brigade commander. Next - the fleet is in your hands. good
      Well, and quite interesting was the counter battle "Kuzi" (guarded by OBK and SSF submarines) against OBK BF, returning from BS from the sea's SR. Oddly enough, the OBK BF won, even the pla hanging on the re-scope was "drowned" with a turntable from "Fearless". Everything was neatly documented, photographed and presented to Kosyak (Deputy Chief Commander of the Navy, Admiral I.V. Kasatonov - senior northerners). There was no order, not even analysis, but we were no longer touched. Yes
      So, to fight honestly with the "aggressor"!
      But there were also "bespoke matches", when we had "tracing papers" on our hands, and we sailed, steered, followed the drawn courses, so that PLoshniki got credit ...
      As the saying goes: "Anything can happen, it happens and scrap floats!" angry
      1. 0
        26 October 2015 00: 52
        "Anything can happen, it happens, and scrap floats"!]

        Just remember the classic Runet:

        ya_frosia: A bunch of crowbars tend to sink.
        alexei: ya_frosia: But in mercury it floats well.
        zoogenic: alexei: But if the scrap is uranium, it’s also drowning in mercury.
        alexei: zoogenic: swamp uranium scrap in mercury itself.
  12. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 38
    it seems that they just toured the echo of the matzah ... well, nothing will do for liberalists
  13. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 42
    Clever! And it turns out, exercises between one tactical school and often between classmates, which sometimes looks played out and unrealistic. God forbid, real events and the result is not predictable. angry
  14. 0
    25 October 2015 11: 47
    There are already "regular" opponents, this is the United States of America. "Probable Hemorrhoids" and the enemy rolled into one ....
  15. +3
    25 October 2015 11: 49
    McCain put on a barge in full outfit and hi floats towards the Crimea
  16. +1
    25 October 2015 11: 50

    "There are already thoughts about creating special staff units that will work in the combat training system for the enemy on a full-time basis and participate in all exercises, already fully working on the tactics of those countries that can probably be considered as an opponent in that or another situation ",
    These states need the very best, so that it would not just confront their tasks. As Suvorov said, it’s hard in exercises, easy in battle.
    1. 0
      25 October 2015 14: 36
      Quote: BOB044
      ... As Suvorov said, it’s hard in exercises, easy in battle.

      hard to learn - easy to trek

      http://www.otrezal.ru/great_ideas/section2/1181.html
  17. +2
    25 October 2015 11: 58
    Quote: Mercury
    McCain put on a barge in full outfit and hi floats towards the Crimea

    Yeah, and force a fork to get from Florida itself! wassat
  18. +1
    25 October 2015 12: 24
    Correctly. It would not hurt to create structures of false prostitutes, false smugglers, false drug dealers and put them on a considerable salary. It would not hurt to open a number of specialized educational institutions for this ... But what? Let the siloviki train ... And pay a salary to everyone from the PFR money, having selected compensation from pensioners. good
    1. +3
      25 October 2015 12: 37
      If our army does not have the appropriate training and modern weapons, the country will be delayed. What kind of compensation? There will be no PFR, nor pensioners, they will tear it apart like Libya, where Gaddafi has set the entire population of gold toilets instead of strengthening his army and air defense.
      1. +1
        25 October 2015 13: 18
        Well, well ... You don’t have to pile everything together. And you perfectly understood what I meant. And why not bring a political base.
        1. 0
          25 October 2015 14: 24
          In the language of political functionaries of the past era, your comment is "political myopia, social irresponsibility and undermining the authority of the ruling power."
  19. +1
    25 October 2015 13: 23
    Timely and smartly approach the matter. Bravo! You need to know how a potential adversary acts. It’s hard to learn, the enemy is up to date :))
  20. +1
    25 October 2015 13: 54
    "lelicasToday, 11: 18 ↑ New
    Aviation is another matter - the Yankes still have the "Aggressor" squadron, but we lost ours in Turkmenistan in the 90s, that's what exactly needs to be recreated. "
    et that poherili ??? Not a transelvan regiment by chance on Nagatino, but a training one, which was shrouded in Astrakhan with the whole squad ???
  21. +1
    25 October 2015 13: 56
    To equip, train, arm according to US standards, and then introduce them to them and replace their army. Costs from the Pentagon budget. At o'clock, H announce that pindocia is occupied by green men for their debts to the world and is being abolished. fellow
  22. +1
    25 October 2015 17: 53
    whose task will include the exercise on the exercises the functions of a probable adversary

    When we were playing "war" in childhood, no one wanted to be "for the Germans"!
    1. 0
      26 October 2015 13: 52
      Quote: pvv113
      whose task will include the exercise on the exercises the functions of a probable adversary

      When we were playing "war" in childhood, no one wanted to be "for the Germans"!

      Yeah, like in an old joke:
      - Guys, they’re taking me to the army!
      - You have enuresis!
      - And they told me: "Never mind, you will be for the Germans!"
  23. +3
    25 October 2015 21: 05
    When I served, my boat was often used as an intruder. But after we managed to escape from the chase several times, we abruptly "went over" to the side of Good.
  24. +1
    25 October 2015 21: 50
    ... after we managed to escape from the chase several times, we abruptly "switched" to the side of Good
    - Did you run into "ramming" or "seizure"?
    PS ... and after such "sea lightnings" usually the award went not to "violators"!
    1. 0
      25 October 2015 22: 13
      yes her. Probably the reason was that the boat was the oldest. The command hoped that new, more modern boats and ships could easily get this old trough. But I had an excellent crew and the boat was in perfect technical condition.
      I served as a naval border guard and the point of the lightning was to prevent the boat from reaching the point, picking it up (for example, a diver) and getting away from the pursuit. The main task of "ours" was to prevent the boat with the "passenger" from leaving. It is clear that they could have shot us down, but they never managed to catch up or block them.
  25. +1
    25 October 2015 21: 52
    A long time ago, when I was still young and strong, and the girls were all as models for me and the service for me was, albeit difficult, but interesting, familiar guys from different special forces units (that, still Soviet) in my free from " work "while drinking a glass of tea, they often talked about all sorts of" tricks "that they performed on the orders of their superiors. For example, they talked about how they "went" to neighboring territories to perform tasks without notifying the border services, and returned, how, in order to check the security, they penetrated our super important facilities, including nuclear power plants, and strategists' facilities. If they succeeded, but as a rule they succeeded, then the perpetrators got their own and the rules and principles of service were revised. If it didn’t work out, then they already began to screw them up and drive them to a sweat, depriving them of everything they could. So some were captains, and became elders. And again they could receive the title only after the next successful operation.
    So today we are returning to the well-forgotten ... And if the operations are still planned realistically, and not because it’s convenient for someone, then this will be of great benefit to combat training.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"