The State Department did not agree with Putin, who criticized the US policy in Syria

The US administration does not agree with Putin’s criticism about Washington’s approach to combating international terrorism, State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters.




"We remain faithful to our approach to countering terrorism, whether in the context of the fight against (network) Al-Qaeda or ISIS in the (Middle Eastern) region," the newspaper quotes Toner Look.

From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (Americans) to be an effective coalition to fight the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the American anti-terrorism strategy.”

“Frankly, the United States agrees with Russia that ISIS must be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (the president) Assad, ”said Toner.

He noted that "Washington has repeatedly and publicly signaled earlier that the Syrian regime cannot be a viable or trustworthy actor in any coalition efforts directed against ISIL."

A State Department spokesman also said that "a moderate Syrian opposition does exist," and it is necessary "to give it a chance to become part of a meaningful and inclusive political transition to a new government in Damascus."

Earlier, Vladimir Putin noted that it is unacceptable to divide terrorists into "moderate" and "unlimited". He also called for "to unite all forces: the regular armies of Iraq and Syria, the Kurdish militia units, various opposition groups ready to really make their real contribution to the defeat of the terrorists."
Photos used:
Shot from US State Department video
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. herruvim 24 October 2015 10: 57 New
    • 68
    • 0
    +68
    Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
    1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
    2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
    3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.
    1. Frigate 24 October 2015 10: 59 New
      • 35
      • 0
      +35
      Quote: herruvim
      Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
      1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
      2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
      3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

      And penguins kill fish by eating it alive. In one word, nonhumans.
      1. MIKHAN 24 October 2015 11: 02 New
        • 44
        • 0
        +44
        State Department disagreed

        It happens ... But sometimes we do not agree! hi
        1. lelikas 24 October 2015 11: 17 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          What is needed for the State Department to agree with Putin ??? It is necessary that the name of their president ends in "OV".
          1. WKS
            WKS 24 October 2015 11: 36 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: lelikas
            What is needed for the State Department to agree with Putin ??? It is necessary that the name of their president ends in "OV".

            So what's up? Obamov Mubarak Huseynovich.
            1. unsinkable 24 October 2015 14: 32 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: wks
              Huseynovich.

              It’s good to skip the letter C.
          2. bylec 24 October 2015 15: 18 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            but we don’t need the consent of the State Department!
        2. Altona 24 October 2015 12: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: MIKHAN
          It happens ... But sometimes we do not agree!

          -----------------
          The State Department has long recruited comedians for comments, Jen Psaki left a decent change ... Well, how can you believe this shorn? On his face the parole from MLS is written ...
        3. Vend 25 October 2015 12: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          We remain true to our approach to countering terrorism
          Yes, we know this, and therefore we are helping Syria. And then with the US counteracting terrorism, the whole east will become a continuous country of terror.
      2. Dryuya2 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (the Americans) an effective coalition to combat the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria

        seems like an effective coalition ????
      3. Penetrator 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Not everything is so simple. Many penguins exhibit homosexual or pseudo-homosexual behavior. And bombing such free personalities is intolerant. Do Americans really want to be known as homophobes in the eyes of "the entire civilized community"? smile
        1. Baikonur 24 October 2015 11: 09 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
          The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
          And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
          Freedom to the penguin people!
          1. vovanpain 24 October 2015 11: 25 New
            • 16
            • 0
            +16
            Quote: Baikonur
            And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
            The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
            And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
            Freedom to the penguin people!

            You almost made a mistake not in the general clique, but in the emperor, emperor penguins destroy peaceful penguins and the main emperor penguin must leave.
          2. dmi.pris 24 October 2015 11: 51 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What are you so worried about the Aboriginal people of Antarctica .. The penguins of Madagascar are already American citizens ... And these too will be accepted .. It's just that their aborigines are not citizens ... Dumb Amer nation ..
            Quote: Baikonur
            And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
            The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
            And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
            Freedom to the penguin people!
        2. Frigate 24 October 2015 11: 11 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Penetrator
          Not everything is so simple. Many penguins exhibit homosexual or pseudo-homosexual behavior. And bombing such free personalities is intolerant. Do Americans really want to be known as homophobes in the eyes of "the entire civilized community"? smile

          This is due to the corrupting influence of American and European stations. We need to remove them from Antarctica. smile
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. just exp 24 October 2015 11: 05 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      penguins are also anti-Semites, they do not recognize the Holocaust, like their anti-Semitic allies of capybara
      1. Temples 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Many penguins exhibit homosexual or pseudo-homosexual behavior.


        Are they showing this to someone? laughing
        Maybe they misunderstood them? (penguins)
        Maybe the penguins show the observer what they will do to him if he does not disappear from their field of vision? laughing
        They don’t know how to speak, that’s what they demonstrate.
        1. Finches 24 October 2015 11: 59 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          It remains to wait for the letter - "I am the daughter of a penguin! Not everything is clear here in Antarctica ...!" laughing
    3. EvgNik 24 October 2015 11: 21 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: herruvim
      Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:

      4. The Frigate's proposal for fish is accepted.
      5. Swimming underwater interferes with the US Navy. (In particular, submarines)
      6. Prepare the invasion of the UK (for some of the penguins, the self-name is royal).
      7. Do not go to the resorts of the USA and Europe, do not buy military products from them (they don’t buy anything at all), which undermines the economy of the West.
    4. novobranets 24 October 2015 11: 21 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote: herruvim
      Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

      American freedom of speech ... Hmm. It’s ridiculous.
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, mattress covers in their repertoire.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. marlin1203 24 October 2015 12: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And there are no blue penguins! There is homophobia laughingI declare responsibly!
  2. vorobey 24 October 2015 10: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    quote ... From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (the Americans) an effective coalition to combat the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the US anti-terrorism strategy.”

    they no longer hide their stupidity and distorted perception of realities ...

    People also call toner ink that is poured into a cartridge for a printer ... laughing
    1. Hello 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: vorobey
      quote ... From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (the Americans) an effective coalition to combat the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the US anti-terrorism strategy.”

      they no longer hide their stupidity and distorted perception of realities ...

      Greetings. It seems to me that they will try to normalize relations with you on the issue of the IG, and will bid on Assad.
      1. vorobey 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Quote: Hello
        and will bid on Assad.


        as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi

        What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..
        1. Hello 24 October 2015 11: 23 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Hello
          and will bid on Assad.


          as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi

          What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..

          Why nothing? For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.
          1. Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 35 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Hello
            For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


            My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool
            1. Hello 24 October 2015 12: 03 New
              • -3
              • 0
              -3
              Quote: Lelek
              Quote: Hello
              For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


              My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool

              Did I offer you something to sell? I'm thinking out loud
              1. Your friend 24 October 2015 12: 32 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Hello
                Quote: Lelek
                Quote: Hello
                For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


                My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool

                Did I offer you something to sell? I'm thinking out loud

                Tell me And what about Assad in Israel? Compared to ISIS, what is worse for Israel?
                1. Hello 24 October 2015 13: 34 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: Your friend
                  Tell me And what about Assad in Israel? Compared to ISIS, what is worse for Israel?

                  Assad in Israel is treated like an enemy, and IS is exactly the same. As for the worse, a good question for me, so the radish is not sweeter. If in Syria Russia instead of Iran sets the tone, then this is for us a plus. hi
          2. vorobey 24 October 2015 11: 41 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Quote: Hello
            Why nothing? For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


            I beg you ... to this degree ... just like Ukraine, let them offer them for free ... this is not that product .. If you have studied Putin well and I think I studied him when he was in the presidential term after Medvedev he was elected .. he didn’t surrender any of his own ... and Chavez Schroeder Berlusconi didn’t refuse anyone, so that they wouldn’t be poured on them by the darkest, never be ashamed of friendship with them and always emphasized ... If Assad has the same relationship with him ... then Amer was not lucky ... after all, he didn’t abandon Yanyk’s swindler ... and this is a risk of authority and image ... It’s the darkest of us to fight for the image to some extent .. it’s more important for him to move his face so that next time he could just ask ... Lamb, don’t do this, you’re wrong ...
          3. just exp 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            and Israel will stop bombing Palestine in exchange for a couple of countries to reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Golan?
            1. vorobey 24 October 2015 12: 17 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: just EXPL
              and Israel will stop bombing Palestine in exchange for a couple of countries to reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Golan?


              Guys do not cling ... now srach will begin again, far from the topic ... I would advise the Israelis now. change rhetoric and seek a compromise with Assad ... if you want to get rid of the enemy make him your friend ... if Israel succeeds, then Syria is unlikely to annoy him in the future because ours are there for a long time and Syria is already in the orbit of Russia, just like in Egypt is now beginning to enter it again, and Lebanon will stretch accordingly (it simply has no choice). Now is the time for Israel to solve this problem. You still do not understand what is not really worth hoping for amers?
              1. just exp 24 October 2015 12: 32 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Israel will never reconcile with Assad; firstly, Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries that is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.
                but they can agree on peace.
                1. Your friend 24 October 2015 12: 35 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  Israel will never reconcile with Assad; firstly, Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries that is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.
                  but they can agree on peace.


                  "Israel will never reconcile with Assad" "but they can quite agree on peace" - don’t you find a contradiction?
                2. vorobey 24 October 2015 12: 48 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries is not under their control


                  I want to see that Arab who will dance at 7-40 laughing
                3. The comment was deleted.
                4. Hello 24 October 2015 16: 02 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  Israel will never reconcile with Assad

                  Never say never, but in the near future it’s unlikely that we will make peace
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  Israel does not like power in the surrounding countries is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.

                  Israel is not happy that Syria does not recognize Israel’s right to exist wink
                  1. Asadullah 24 October 2015 23: 31 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Israel is not happy that Syria does not recognize Israel’s right to exist


                    Well, a dozen countries, does not recognize Israel's right to exist, because then you have to recognize the presence of the Messiah and the rapid end of the world (though hell knows, with your nigger friends on a mattress). Zionist atheists did not expect a game of such a strong Old Testament faith of the surrounding nations. If they knew, they would have composed another name, for example, the Republic of Zion and Palestine. smile So now, I don’t even know what to do. Well, the Jews will somehow find a way out. By the way, Syria in this matter only supported the coalition of Arab states, more from political considerations than from ideological ones.
              2. tiheros 24 October 2015 20: 00 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Israel does not need friends; Israel needs territories.
                1. Hello 24 October 2015 21: 08 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: tiheros
                  Israel does not need friends; Israel needs territories.

                  Strongly said, and what kind of territory does Israel need? fellow
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Asadullah 24 October 2015 11: 28 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        they will try to normalize


        Here the concepts of norm are blurred. In the USA today they themselves do not understand what the norm is. The entire political movement of the States was the victim of its own struggle. The struggle for dominance. Which has become the norm. Everything that does not fall into the Procrustean bed of this norm is cut off. Any concessions or agreements with the Russian Federation are beyond the scope of this rule. All vassal states are also honed under it. From that, the only method of counteracting Russia, and this is the only thing that the US administration is capable of today, is the division of Syria into two zones of influence. Like Korea. But here everything rests on the mentality of the Arabs. Who do not have a clear line dividing them into two camps. They always gravitated to power. ISIS showed strength, some Arabs reached out to them, believing that the radical ideas of Islam are an indisputable force. They will also go to the side of Assad, if the superiority of power will be on his side. The Americans showed weakness, therefore they do not obey them, but stupidly use them in the spirit of oriental trade, a fool is always wrong. That is why, only radicals can gather in the American zone of influence, because they have nowhere to go, by the nature of today's events. But in this case, the Americans will have to declare their support for the radicals, because no one knows what “democratic Islamists” are.
      4. Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 47 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        .It seems to me


        It seems - this is not an argument. Imagine a carpenter who decided to burn his planer or hammer. Can you So the State Department cannot destroy its expensive policy tool, which he created and cherished for years. In reality, only the coalition created by Russia will fight ISIS, while America and others like it will put us in the wheel, which they are now demonstrating. yes
      5. Zoldat_A 24 October 2015 11: 51 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        It seems to me that they will try to normalize relations with you on the IS issue, and will bargain about Assad.

        Why bargain here - we don’t have any Assads for sale ... We don’t trade them. Oil, gas - yes. But Assad is not. This is in America, in Europe, in Israel - from chewing gum to the homeland - everything is sold, most importantly, to give a good price. If we were like that, Assad would have been bargaining a long time ago. Previously, it was necessary to bargain with us, in the 90's, when the Drunkard sold everything. And now slowly, very slowly, but we are trying to remove such "merchants" with dust.
      6. novobranets 24 October 2015 11: 52 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        I think they will try to normalize relations with you on the IG issue, and will bargain about Assad.

        If the refusal to share intelligence, arming the bandits with modern anti-tank weapons and planning for the delivery of MANPADS is normalization, then what is destabilization? Regarding Assad, he, his army, Iraq, and the Kurds, are the only ones who really fight and resist the crazy feeding ups of America-ISIS. That is, Russia must surrender Assad to strengthen the fight against Islamists? This is at least ridiculous.
  3. rf xnumx 24 October 2015 11: 04 New
    • 29
    • 0
    +29
    The State Department did not agree with Putin, who criticized the US policy in Syria
    Sneeze on their opinion
  4. Coconut Tima 24 October 2015 11: 05 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    “We remain true to our approach to countering terrorism, whether in the context of the fight against (network) Al Qaeda or ISIS in the (Middle East) region.”
  5. bakhit 24 October 2015 11: 08 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    International politics has degraded; black is easy to imagine as white and vice versa. At this pace, we will soon really come to the end of the set. This stupid easy to push the red button
  6. Masya masya 24 October 2015 11: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    This is how to twist, twist in order to supply and nurture on the one hand, and on the other hand to pretend that you are fighting ...
  7. moskowit 24 October 2015 11: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In this situation, a parasite expression is appropriate, I don’t know why, well, it’s very popular: "Yes, okay!"
    1. ava09 24 October 2015 11: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: moskowit
      In this situation, a parasite expression is appropriate, I don’t know why, well, it’s very popular: "Yes, okay!"


      The parasite expression does not carry a semantic load. Come on - really - do not agree - do not lie and so on. That’s why it’s popular that they can express a lot without resorting to specific expressions that can cause rejection.
  8. BOB044 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Assad will not be and our bases will be forced to withdraw from there. And the Mediterranean Sea will be under the US Navy. And from the court and all the ensuing consequences. About breaking the USA, look for stupid people in the neighboring village. hi
  9. MATROSKIN-53 24 October 2015 11: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    To listen to these cephalopods - do not respect yourself!
  10. Alekst 24 October 2015 11: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “Frankly, the United States agrees with Russia that ISIS must be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (the president) Assad, ”said Toner.
    What is the matter, by and large, who will take part in the Syrian political process? the Syrians will probably figure it out for themselves who can and cannot.
  11. nord62 24 October 2015 11: 16 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Increasingly, I find myself thinking that the American regime cannot be competent. Just a global gathering of scammers! Everything matters, everyone criticizes, everywhere they find "their vital interests." If they could arrange a “color revolution” - they wouldn’t leave the TV sets! laughing
  12. solvi 24 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This poor Toner is always with a tense, dull face, opens his mouth only for excuse. Not a single word of truth, one hatred. I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?
    1. Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: solvi
      I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?


      There is worse, for example, Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Minister.
      1. fox21h 24 October 2015 12: 10 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Lelek
        Quote: solvi
        I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?


        There is worse, for example, Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Minister.

        They don’t apply a hand to an empty head, although how do you know whether there are no brains, one bone
        1. Sorokin 24 October 2015 12: 46 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: fox21h
          They don’t apply a hand to an empty head, although how do you know whether there are no brains, one bone

          The amers are applied according to the charter. Because the head in, c should be empty and filled only with orders from above.
      2. KnightRider 24 October 2015 15: 23 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Lelek
        Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Secretary.

        Did she even serve in the army?
  13. MIKHAN 24 October 2015 11: 20 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Quote: vorobey
    as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi
    What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..

    THERE IS NOTHING! The video is classic and there is nothing to add! (Uploaded today, everything is so)))))
  14. roskot 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And who is in awe of criticism. I do not agree and that's it.
  15. Sagittarius YaNAO 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, they’re dumber and dumber, it’s insulting, even heart to heart there’s no one to talk to.
  16. Renat 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Boring without psaki.
  17. Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 24 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    “Frankly, the US agrees with Russia that ISIS needs to be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (President) Assad. ”

    Yes, you are lying, gentlemen of the Americans. Not that you created ISIS to destroy it now. You will in every way save and cherish this expensive instrument of your policy in the BV, North Africa and the Maghreb countries.
    As for President Assad, it is not up to you to decide his fate, but to the Syrian people - to the very DEMOS from whom the concept of DEMOCRACY came about, which you care so bloody for.
  18. Alexander 3 24 October 2015 11: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, we are not a banana republic for Babama.
  19. Obolensky 24 October 2015 11: 26 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Well, the meaning of the statement of this opus by the State Department? You might think we heard something radically new. Every time they open their mouths, I want to close my eyes and ears, so as not to hear about their exclusivity, infallibility and determination to save the world from Evil. But apparently mirrors are prohibited for a very long time in the State Department and in the White House in particular. Otherwise, where so much nonsense about their exclusivity. Just some kind of succubi.
  20. Mountain shooter 24 October 2015 11: 41 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Feeling completely confused striatum. They cannot “turn back” in Assad’s question because they will lose face. And this is worse in the East than military defeat. And they can’t do anything, because the “Caliber” volley showed that if something, everything is under the gun, and you shouldn’t make sudden movements, they may not understand it. I kept thinking, why do we need Su 30, and even in such a scanty amount? But it turned out that this too was a precisely calculated "demo". They showed how far and how quickly our fighters can react to all sorts of Turkish, British and other flying. A small amount - shows that we are not afraid of these "partners". Well, we cover it slightly from above ... And what, have we heard for a long time about the bombing of the Kurds by Turkish aircraft? Here it is. And they could answer unclearly by whose drone, it is not clear what was shot down, after a THREE-TIME WARNING!
    If you really warned - UAV, this is how you should be afraid!
    1. Приговор 24 October 2015 12: 23 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      All our actions in Syria are a solid demo ..;))) In other words: see what we can do with a scanty number of planes in a limited time ... By the way, not at all new planes, but only modernized ones. And from a salvo with just four “tiny” ships, our “partners” broke the template ... And everything that flies over Syria is under the gun of our air defense, and they also know this ... Let them be afraid of what they do not know. What we did not show them.
  21. yuriy55 24 October 2015 11: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    From the State Department’s point of view, “Washington has built what seems to us (the Americans) an effective coalition to fight the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the US anti-terrorism strategy.”

    From the point of view of Russia, during the construction of this coalition, the territory of Syria, on which ISIS gangs settled, significantly increased. The question begs: "What are they building there and should Russia not pay attention to these foremen?"
    The State Department spokesman also said that "moderate Syrian opposition does exist," and "Give her a chance to become part of a meaningful and inclusive political transition to a new government in Damascus."

    They would have been given a chance if they had been caught ... lol
  22. Stariknv 24 October 2015 12: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The US will bomb Syria because it doesn’t like Assad, then Assad doesn’t like Obama. It should mean bombing the USA.
  23. cherkas.oe 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: herruvim
    The State Department spokesman also said that "moderate Syrian opposition really exists,"

    Only the bastard is hiding so that p-n-d-o = c = s themselves cannot find them.
  24. yur2079 24 October 2015 12: 17 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Is it your canine affair, you sons of bitches, to be al-Assad in the political process of Syria or not ...?!
    1. anfil 24 October 2015 15: 09 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Is it your canine affair, you sons of bitches, to be al-Assad in the political process of Syria or not ...?!


      Mattress makers simply did not expect such resistance from an ophthalmologist, so they are wrinkled. Cambridge Guard Suckers.
  25. Aleksander 24 October 2015 12: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "Washington has repeatedly and publicly signaled earlier that the Syrian regime cannot be a viable or credible actor in any coalition effort against ISIS."


    I am also repeatedly surprised by the unprecedented arrogance of the United States — well, why, why do they determine who is trustworthy in Syria and who is not worthy ?! And also in Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, etc.?
  26. Zumich 24 October 2015 13: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    America, this is the "kindergarten" of terrorism, this is the very head of the "rotten fish."
    America country terrorist, further derivative verbiage
  27. RuslanNN 24 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Since the striped do not agree with us, then we are doing everything right.
  28. xin-l 24 October 2015 14: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: herruvim
    Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
    1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
    2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
    3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

    By the way, the Americans absolutely do not need anyone to be bombarded, they have one pseudoscientific figure there, FIG understand who, I don’t even remember my name, offered to arrange a bombing of the Sun, again FIG knows why, whether it does not fit into the American paradigm of national security and democracy, either there are insufficient thermonuclear processes going on, or love to bomb the thread. The same Chinese also love what to blow up the thread but do it peacefully with fireworks for the Spring Festival. But Americans don’t know how. alas alas.
    By the way, Toner sometimes reminds me of Voldemort.
  29. afrikanez 24 October 2015 19: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Damn, they are about FOMA and they are about YEREMU! So no one will ever agree on anything. After all, they probably understand that they are wrong on the Syrian issue and one member of the rod is like a "bull on a red rag." This people, apart from money, seem to be neither interested in anything nor when. When will this cesspool fail in hell? angry
  30. imugn 24 October 2015 20: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    To destroy a terrorist organization, the Americans needed a coalition from 69 countries and they are proud of it
  31. Stariknv 24 October 2015 21: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The United States will never agree with Russia in Syria. So the terrorists are their feeding.
  32. sharp-lad 24 October 2015 22: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I do not consider Obama's regime legitimate! With their flawed and non-transparent election system, a complete lack of control over the government, a very numerous repressive apparatus with almost unlimited powers, and a legislative body completely inadequate! And generally they do not decide for the Syrians !!!