Military Review

The State Department did not agree with Putin, who criticized the US policy in Syria

70
The US administration does not agree with Putin’s criticism about Washington’s approach to combating international terrorism, State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters.




"We remain faithful to our approach to countering terrorism, whether in the context of the fight against (network) Al-Qaeda or ISIS in the (Middle Eastern) region," the newspaper quotes Toner Look.

From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (Americans) to be an effective coalition to fight the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the American anti-terrorism strategy.”

“Frankly, the United States agrees with Russia that ISIS must be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (the president) Assad, ”said Toner.

He noted that "Washington has repeatedly and publicly signaled earlier that the Syrian regime cannot be a viable or trustworthy actor in any coalition efforts directed against ISIL."

A State Department spokesman also said that "a moderate Syrian opposition does exist," and it is necessary "to give it a chance to become part of a meaningful and inclusive political transition to a new government in Damascus."

Earlier, Vladimir Putin noted that it is unacceptable to divide terrorists into "moderate" and "unlimited". He also called for "to unite all forces: the regular armies of Iraq and Syria, the Kurdish militia units, various opposition groups ready to really make their real contribution to the defeat of the terrorists."
Photos used:
Shot from US State Department video
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. herruvim
    herruvim 24 October 2015 10: 57 New
    68
    Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
    1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
    2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
    3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.
    1. Frigate
      Frigate 24 October 2015 10: 59 New
      35
      Quote: herruvim
      Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
      1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
      2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
      3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

      And penguins kill fish by eating it alive. In one word, nonhumans.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 24 October 2015 11: 02 New
        44
        State Department disagreed

        It happens ... But sometimes we do not agree! hi
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 24 October 2015 11: 17 New
          +2
          Что нужно , чтобы госдеп согласился с Путиным ??? Нужно , чтобы фамилия их президента , заканчивалась на "ОВ" .
          1. WKS
            WKS 24 October 2015 11: 36 New
            +2
            Quote: lelikas
            Что нужно , чтобы госдеп согласился с Путиным ??? Нужно , чтобы фамилия их президента , заканчивалась на "ОВ" .

            So what's up? Obamov Mubarak Huseynovich.
            1. unsinkable
              unsinkable 24 October 2015 14: 32 New
              +1
              Quote: wks
              Huseynovich.

              It’s good to skip the letter C.
          2. bylec
            bylec 24 October 2015 15: 18 New
            0
            but we don’t need the consent of the State Department!
        2. Altona
          Altona 24 October 2015 12: 22 New
          +1
          Quote: MIKHAN
          It happens ... But sometimes we do not agree!

          -----------------
          The State Department has long recruited comedians for comments, Jen Psaki left a decent change ... Well, how can you believe this shorn? On his face the parole from MLS is written ...
        3. Vend
          Vend 25 October 2015 12: 00 New
          0
          We remain true to our approach to countering terrorism
          Yes, we know this, and therefore we are helping Syria. And then with the US counteracting terrorism, the whole east will become a continuous country of terror.
      2. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
        +6
        С точки зрения Госдепа, «Вашингтон выстроил то, что нам (американцам) кажется эффективной коалицией для борьбы с террористической группировкой "Исламское государство" в Ираке и Сирии

        seems like an effective coalition ????
      3. Penetrator
        Penetrator 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
        +7
        Не всё так однозначно. Многие пингвины демонстрируют гомосексуальное или псевдо-гомосексуальное поведение. И бомбить таких свободных личностей - нетолерантно. Разве американцы захотят прослыть гомофобами в глазах "всего цивилизованного сообщества"? smile
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 24 October 2015 11: 09 New
          +8
          And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
          The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
          And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
          Freedom to the penguin people!
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 24 October 2015 11: 25 New
            16
            Quote: Baikonur
            And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
            The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
            And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
            Freedom to the penguin people!

            You almost made a mistake not in the general clique, but in the emperor, emperor penguins destroy peaceful penguins and the main emperor penguin must leave.
          2. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 24 October 2015 11: 51 New
            +1
            What are you so worried about the Aboriginal people of Antarctica .. The penguins of Madagascar are already American citizens ... And these too will be accepted .. It's just that their aborigines are not citizens ... Dumb Amer nation ..
            Quote: Baikonur
            And penguins do not have media, so there is no freedom of speech, democracy!
            The penguin mode of the General Penguin must be overthrown, destroyed!
            And most importantly - He does not buy heaters (from the USA) for freezing penguins!
            Freedom to the penguin people!
        2. Frigate
          Frigate 24 October 2015 11: 11 New
          +2
          Quote: Penetrator
          Не всё так однозначно. Многие пингвины демонстрируют гомосексуальное или псевдо-гомосексуальное поведение. И бомбить таких свободных личностей - нетолерантно. Разве американцы захотят прослыть гомофобами в глазах "всего цивилизованного сообщества"? smile

          This is due to the corrupting influence of American and European stations. We need to remove them from Antarctica. smile
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. just exp
      just exp 24 October 2015 11: 05 New
      12
      penguins are also anti-Semites, they do not recognize the Holocaust, like their anti-Semitic allies of capybara
      1. Temples
        Temples 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
        0
        Many penguins exhibit homosexual or pseudo-homosexual behavior.


        Are they showing this to someone? laughing
        Maybe they misunderstood them? (penguins)
        Maybe the penguins show the observer what they will do to him if he does not disappear from their field of vision? laughing
        They don’t know how to speak, that’s what they demonstrate.
        1. Finches
          Finches 24 October 2015 11: 59 New
          +9
          It remains to wait for the letter - "Я дочь пингвина!У нас в Антарктиде не все однозначно...!" laughing
    3. EvgNik
      EvgNik 24 October 2015 11: 21 New
      +9
      Quote: herruvim
      Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:

      4. The Frigate's proposal for fish is accepted.
      5. Swimming underwater interferes with the US Navy. (In particular, submarines)
      6. Prepare the invasion of the UK (for some of the penguins, the self-name is royal).
      7. Do not go to the resorts of the USA and Europe, do not buy military products from them (they don’t buy anything at all), which undermines the economy of the West.
    4. novobranets
      novobranets 24 October 2015 11: 21 New
      12
      Quote: herruvim
      Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

      American freedom of speech ... Hmm. It’s ridiculous.
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
      0
      Yes, mattress covers in their repertoire.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. marlin1203
      marlin1203 24 October 2015 12: 13 New
      +1
      And there are no blue penguins! There is homophobia laughingI declare responsibly!
  2. vorobey
    vorobey 24 October 2015 10: 58 New
    +2
    цитата...С точки зрения Госдепа, «Вашингтон выстроил то, что нам (американцам) кажется эффективной коалицией для борьбы с террористической группировкой "Исламское государство" в Ираке и Сирии, причём это – лишь один компонент американской антитеррористической стратегии».

    they no longer hide their stupidity and distorted perception of realities ...

    People also call toner ink that is poured into a cartridge for a printer ... laughing
    1. Hello
      Hello 24 October 2015 11: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: vorobey
      цитата...С точки зрения Госдепа, «Вашингтон выстроил то, что нам (американцам) кажется эффективной коалицией для борьбы с террористической группировкой "Исламское государство" в Ираке и Сирии, причём это – лишь один компонент американской антитеррористической стратегии».

      they no longer hide their stupidity and distorted perception of realities ...

      Greetings. It seems to me that they will try to normalize relations with you on the issue of the IG, and will bid on Assad.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
        12
        Quote: Hello
        and will bid on Assad.


        as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi

        What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..
        1. Hello
          Hello 24 October 2015 11: 23 New
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Hello
          and will bid on Assad.


          as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi

          What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..

          Why nothing? For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.
          1. Lelek
            Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 35 New
            +2
            Quote: Hello
            For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


            My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool
            1. Hello
              Hello 24 October 2015 12: 03 New
              -3
              Quote: Lelek
              Quote: Hello
              For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


              My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool

              Did I offer you something to sell? I'm thinking out loud
              1. Your friend
                Your friend 24 October 2015 12: 32 New
                +1
                Quote: Hello
                Quote: Lelek
                Quote: Hello
                For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


                My dear, Russia does not sell its territory, well, as you TAM will not understand this. fool

                Did I offer you something to sell? I'm thinking out loud

                Tell me And what about Assad in Israel? Compared to ISIS, what is worse for Israel?
                1. Hello
                  Hello 24 October 2015 13: 34 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Your friend
                  Tell me And what about Assad in Israel? Compared to ISIS, what is worse for Israel?

                  Assad in Israel is treated like an enemy, and IS is exactly the same. As for the worse, a good question for me, so the radish is not sweeter. If in Syria Russia instead of Iran sets the tone, then this is for us a plus. hi
          2. vorobey
            vorobey 24 October 2015 11: 41 New
            +8
            Quote: Hello
            Why nothing? For example, reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Crimea.


            I beg you ... to this degree ... just like Ukraine, let them offer them for free ... this is not that product .. If you have studied Putin well and I think I studied him when he was in the presidential term after Medvedev he was elected .. he didn’t surrender any of his own ... and Chavez Schroeder Berlusconi didn’t refuse anyone, so that they wouldn’t be poured on them by the darkest, never be ashamed of friendship with them and always emphasized ... If Assad has the same relationship with him ... then Amer was not lucky ... after all, he didn’t abandon Yanyk’s swindler ... and this is a risk of authority and image ... It’s the darkest of us to fight for the image to some extent .. it’s more important for him to move his face so that next time he could just ask ... Lamb, don’t do this, you’re wrong ...
          3. just exp
            just exp 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
            +5
            and Israel will stop bombing Palestine in exchange for a couple of countries to reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Golan?
            1. vorobey
              vorobey 24 October 2015 12: 17 New
              +4
              Quote: just EXPL
              and Israel will stop bombing Palestine in exchange for a couple of countries to reduce the degree of inadequacy about the Golan?


              Guys do not cling ... now srach will begin again, far from the topic ... I would advise the Israelis now. change rhetoric and seek a compromise with Assad ... if you want to get rid of the enemy make him your friend ... if Israel succeeds, then Syria is unlikely to annoy him in the future because ours are there for a long time and Syria is already in the orbit of Russia, just like in Egypt is now beginning to enter it again, and Lebanon will stretch accordingly (it simply has no choice). Now is the time for Israel to solve this problem. You still do not understand what is not really worth hoping for amers?
              1. just exp
                just exp 24 October 2015 12: 32 New
                +1
                Israel will never reconcile with Assad; firstly, Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries that is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.
                but they can agree on peace.
                1. Your friend
                  Your friend 24 October 2015 12: 35 New
                  +1
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  Israel will never reconcile with Assad; firstly, Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries that is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.
                  but they can agree on peace.


                  "Израиль с Асадом не помирятся никогда" "а вот договориться о мире могут вполне" - не находите противоречие?
                2. vorobey
                  vorobey 24 October 2015 12: 48 New
                  +4
                  Quote: just explo
                  Israel is not satisfied with the power in the surrounding countries is not under their control


                  I want to see that Arab who will dance at 7-40 laughing
                3. The comment was deleted.
                4. Hello
                  Hello 24 October 2015 16: 02 New
                  +1
                  Quote: just explo
                  Israel will never reconcile with Assad

                  Never say never, but in the near future it’s unlikely that we will make peace
                  Quote: just explo
                  Israel does not like power in the surrounding countries is not under their control. therefore, they will change Assad in any case, and Assad will not ideologically approach rapprochement with Israel.

                  Israel is not happy that Syria does not recognize Israel’s right to exist wink
                  1. Asadullah
                    Asadullah 24 October 2015 23: 31 New
                    0
                    Israel is not happy that Syria does not recognize Israel’s right to exist


                    Well, a dozen countries, does not recognize Israel's right to exist, because then you have to recognize the presence of the Messiah and the rapid end of the world (though hell knows, with your nigger friends on a mattress). Zionist atheists did not expect a game of such a strong Old Testament faith of the surrounding nations. If they knew, they would have composed another name, for example, the Republic of Zion and Palestine. smile So now, I don’t even know what to do. Well, the Jews will somehow find a way out. By the way, Syria in this matter only supported the coalition of Arab states, more from political considerations than from ideological ones.
              2. tiheros
                tiheros 24 October 2015 20: 00 New
                +1
                Israel does not need friends; Israel needs territories.
                1. Hello
                  Hello 24 October 2015 21: 08 New
                  0
                  Quote: tiheros
                  Israel does not need friends; Israel needs territories.

                  Strongly said, and what kind of territory does Israel need? fellow
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Asadullah
        Asadullah 24 October 2015 11: 28 New
        +3
        they will try to normalize


        Тут понятия нормы размыты. В США сегодня сами не понимают что такое норма. Все политическое движение Штатов, стало жертвой собственной борьбы. Борьбы за доминирование. Которая стала нормой. Все что не попадает в прокрустово ложе этой нормы, отрезается. Любые уступки или соглашения с РФ выходят за рамки этой нормы. Под неё затачивают и все вассальные государства. От того, единственный метод противодействия России, а это единственное, на что способна сегодня администрация США, это разделение Сирии на две зоны влияния. По типу Кореи. Но здесь все упирается в менталитет арабов. У которых нет четкой грани разделяющих их на два лагеря. Они всегда тянулись к силе. ИГИЛ показал силу, часть арабов потянулись к ним, посчитав что радикальные идеи ислама являются непререкаемой силой. Так же они перейдут на сторону Асада, если перевес силы будет на его стороне. Американцы показали слабость, поэтому им не подчиняются, а тупо используют в духе восточной торговли, глупец всегда неправ. Именно по-этому, на американской зоне влияния могут собраться лишь радикалы, ибо деваться, по характеру сегодняшних событий, им некуда. Но в этом случае, американцам придется декларировать поддержку радикалам, ибо что такое "демократические исламисты" никто не знает.
      4. Lelek
        Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 47 New
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        .It seems to me


        КАЖЕТСЯ - это не аргумент. Представьте себе плотника, который решил сжечь свои рубанок или молоток. Можете? Так и Госдеп не может уничтожить свой дорогостоящий инструмент политики, который он создавал и лелеял годами. Реально с ИГИЛ будет бороться только коалиция, создаваемая Россией, а Америка и иже с ней "Ко" будут ставить нам палки в колёса, что они и демонстрируют сейчас. yes
      5. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 24 October 2015 11: 51 New
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        It seems to me that they will try to normalize relations with you on the IS issue, and will bargain about Assad.

        Why bargain here - we don’t have any Assads for sale ... We don’t trade them. Oil, gas - yes. But Assad is not. Это в Америке, в Европе, в Израиле - от жвачки до Родины - всё продаётся, главное, чтобы цену хорошую давали. Были б мы такие - давно бы Асада сторговали. Раньше нужно было с нами торговаться, в 90-х, когда Пьяница всё продавал. А сейчас медленно, очень медленно, но пытаемся дустом вывести таких "коммерсантов".
      6. novobranets
        novobranets 24 October 2015 11: 52 New
        +4
        Quote: Hello
        I think they will try to normalize relations with you on the IG issue, and will bargain about Assad.

        If the refusal to share intelligence, arming the bandits with modern anti-tank weapons and planning for the delivery of MANPADS is normalization, then what is destabilization? Regarding Assad, he, his army, Iraq, and the Kurds, are the only ones who really fight and resist the crazy feeding ups of America-ISIS. That is, Russia must surrender Assad to strengthen the fight against Islamists? This is at least ridiculous.
  3. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 24 October 2015 11: 04 New
    29
    The State Department did not agree with Putin, who criticized the US policy in Syria
    Sneeze on their opinion
  4. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 24 October 2015 11: 05 New
    12
    “We remain true to our approach to countering terrorism, whether in the context of the fight against (network) Al Qaeda or ISIS in the (Middle East) region.”
  5. bakhit
    bakhit 24 October 2015 11: 08 New
    +4
    International politics has degraded; black is easy to imagine as white and vice versa. At this pace, we will soon really come to the end of the set. This stupid easy to push the red button
  6. Masya masya
    Masya masya 24 October 2015 11: 10 New
    +4
    This is how to twist, twist in order to supply and nurture on the one hand, and on the other hand to pretend that you are fighting ...
  7. moskowit
    moskowit 24 October 2015 11: 11 New
    +1
    В этой ситуации уместно выражение-паразит, не знаю, почему, ну уж очень популярное: " Да, ладно!"
    1. ava09
      ava09 24 October 2015 11: 28 New
      +1
      Quote: moskowit
      В этой ситуации уместно выражение-паразит, не знаю, почему, ну уж очень популярное: " Да, ладно!"


      The parasite expression does not carry a semantic load. Come on - really - do not agree - do not lie and so on. That’s why it’s popular that they can express a lot without resorting to specific expressions that can cause rejection.
  8. BOB044
    BOB044 24 October 2015 11: 13 New
    +2
    Assad will not be and our bases will be forced to withdraw from there. And the Mediterranean Sea will be under the US Navy. And from the court and all the ensuing consequences. About breaking the USA, look for stupid people in the neighboring village. hi
  9. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 24 October 2015 11: 14 New
    +1
    To listen to these cephalopods - do not respect yourself!
  10. Alekst
    Alekst 24 October 2015 11: 16 New
    +2
    “Frankly, the United States agrees with Russia that ISIS must be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (the president) Assad, ”said Toner.
    What is the matter, by and large, who will take part in the Syrian political process? the Syrians will probably figure it out for themselves who can and cannot.
  11. nord62
    nord62 24 October 2015 11: 16 New
    +3
    Все чаще ловлю себя на мысли, что американский режим не может быть дееспособным. Просто мировое сборище лохотронщиков! До всего есть дело, все критикуют, везде находят "свои жизненные интересы". Вот бы им устроить "цветную революцию" - от телевизоры бы не отходил! laughing
  12. solvi
    solvi 24 October 2015 11: 18 New
    +1
    This poor Toner is always with a tense, dull face, opens his mouth only for excuse. Not a single word of truth, one hatred. I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 31 New
      +2
      Quote: solvi
      I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?


      There is worse, for example, Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Minister.
      1. fox21h
        fox21h 24 October 2015 12: 10 New
        +2
        Quote: Lelek
        Quote: solvi
        I wonder if Uncle Sam is all like that?


        There is worse, for example, Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Minister.

        They don’t apply a hand to an empty head, although how do you know whether there are no brains, one bone
        1. Sorokin
          Sorokin 24 October 2015 12: 46 New
          +2
          Quote: fox21h
          They don’t apply a hand to an empty head, although how do you know whether there are no brains, one bone

          The amers are applied according to the charter. Because the head in, c should be empty and filled only with orders from above.
      2. KnightRider
        KnightRider 24 October 2015 15: 23 New
        +1
        Quote: Lelek
        Deborah Lee James - US Air Force Secretary.

        Did she even serve in the army?
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 24 October 2015 11: 20 New
    12
    Quote: vorobey
    as Kisa Vorobyaninov said - bargaining is not appropriate here .. good afternoon .. hi
    What are you talking about .. bargaining is when there is something to offer ... they really have nothing to offer ..

    THERE IS NOTHING! The video is classic and there is nothing to add! (Uploaded today, everything is so)))))
  14. roskot
    roskot 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    +1
    And who is in awe of criticism. I do not agree and that's it.
  15. Sagittarius YaNAO
    Sagittarius YaNAO 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    +1
    Well, they’re dumber and dumber, it’s insulting, even heart to heart there’s no one to talk to.
  16. Renat
    Renat 24 October 2015 11: 22 New
    +3
    Boring without psaki.
  17. Lelek
    Lelek 24 October 2015 11: 24 New
    +4
    “Frankly, the US agrees with Russia that ISIS needs to be destroyed. At the same time, the authorities proceed from the fact that Syria needs a political process that cannot include (President) Assad. ”

    Yes, you are lying, gentlemen of the Americans. Not that you created ISIS to destroy it now. You will in every way save and cherish this expensive instrument of your policy in the BV, North Africa and the Maghreb countries.
    As for President Assad, it is not up to you to decide his fate, but to the Syrian people - to the very DEMOS from whom the concept of DEMOCRACY came about, which you care so bloody for.
  18. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 24 October 2015 11: 24 New
    +1
    Well, we are not a banana republic for Babama.
  19. Obolensky
    Obolensky 24 October 2015 11: 26 New
    +5
    Well, the meaning of the statement of this opus by the State Department? You might think we heard something radically new. Every time they open their mouths, I want to close my eyes and ears, so as not to hear about their exclusivity, infallibility and determination to save the world from Evil. But apparently mirrors are prohibited for a very long time in the State Department and in the White House in particular. Otherwise, where so much nonsense about their exclusivity. Just some kind of succubi.
  20. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 24 October 2015 11: 41 New
    +7
    Чувствуется полная растерянность полосатоухих. Они не могут "сдать назад" в вопросе Асада, поскольку потеряют лицо. А это на Востоке пострашнее военного поражения. И сделать ничего не могут, поскольку залп "Калибров" показал, что ежели чего, все под прицелом, и резких движений делать не стоит, могут не так понять. Я все время думал, зачем нам Су 30, да ещё и в таком мизерном количестве? А оказалось, что и это - точно рассчитанная "демонстрашка". Показали, как далеко и насколько быстро могут среагировать наши истребители на всякие турецкие, Британские и прочие леталки. А малое количество - показывает, что мы не опасаемся этих "партнёров". Ну так, прикрываем слегка сверху ... И что, давно мы слышали о бомбежках курдов турецкой авиацией ? Вот то-то. А ответить смогли непонятно чьим беспилотником, непонятно чем сбитым, после ТРЕХКРАТНОГО ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЯ!
    If you really warned - UAV, this is how you should be afraid!
    1. Приговор
      Приговор 24 October 2015 12: 23 New
      +3
      Все наши действия в Сирии сплошная демонстрашка..;))) Другими словами: смотрите чего мы можем сделать мизерным количеством самолётов за ограниченное время... Кстати, совсем не новых самолётов, а лишь модернизированных. А от залпа всего лишь с четырёх "крошечных" кораблей у наших "партнёров" разрыв шаблона случился... И всё, что сейчас над Сирией летает, оно под прицелом нашей ПВО, и они это тоже знают... Пусть боятся того, чего они не знают. Того, чего мы им не показали.
  21. yuriy55
    yuriy55 24 October 2015 11: 57 New
    +1
    From the point of view of the State Department, “Washington has built what seems to us (Americans) to be an effective coalition to fight the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq and Syria, and this is only one component of the American anti-terrorism strategy.”

    From the point of view of Russia, during the construction of this coalition, the territory of Syria, on which ISIS gangs settled, significantly increased. The question begs: "Что они там строят и должна ли Россия не обращать внимания на этих прорабов?"
    The State Department spokesman also said that "moderate Syrian opposition does exist," and "Give her a chance to become part of a meaningful and inclusive political transition to a new government in Damascus."

    They would have been given a chance if they had been caught ... lol
  22. Stariknv
    Stariknv 24 October 2015 12: 00 New
    +2
    The US will bomb Syria because it doesn’t like Assad, then Assad doesn’t like Obama. It should mean bombing the USA.
  23. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 24 October 2015 12: 02 New
    +1
    Quote: herruvim
    The State Department spokesman also said that "moderate Syrian opposition really exists,"

    Only the bastard is hiding so that p-n-d-o = c = s themselves cannot find them.
  24. yur2079
    yur2079 24 October 2015 12: 17 New
    +3
    Is it your canine affair, you sons of bitches, to be al-Assad in the political process of Syria or not ...?!
    1. anfil
      anfil 24 October 2015 15: 09 New
      +2
      Is it your canine affair, you sons of bitches, to be al-Assad in the political process of Syria or not ...?!


      Mattress makers simply did not expect such resistance from an ophthalmologist, so they are wrinkled. Cambridge Guard Suckers.
  25. Aleksander
    Aleksander 24 October 2015 12: 18 New
    +3
    "Washington has repeatedly and publicly signaled earlier that the Syrian regime cannot be a viable or credible actor in any coalition effort against ISIS."


    I am also repeatedly surprised by the unprecedented arrogance of the United States — well, why, why do they determine who is trustworthy in Syria and who is not worthy ?! And also in Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, etc.?
  26. Zumich
    Zumich 24 October 2015 13: 07 New
    +3
    Америка, это "детский сад" тероризма, это та самая голова "тухлой рыбы".
    America country terrorist, further derivative verbiage
  27. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 24 October 2015 13: 50 New
    +2
    Since the striped do not agree with us, then we are doing everything right.
  28. xin-l
    xin-l 24 October 2015 14: 23 New
    0
    Quote: herruvim
    Why Americans will soon bomb Antarctica:
    1) The penguins did not declare their support for the United States, which means they support international terrorism.
    2) Apart from the penguins, no one lives in Antarctica, there are ethnic cleansings.
    3) Penguins do not speak, which means freedom of speech is not respected.

    By the way, the Americans absolutely do not need anyone to be bombarded, they have one pseudoscientific figure there, FIG understand who, I don’t even remember my name, offered to arrange a bombing of the Sun, again FIG knows why, whether it does not fit into the American paradigm of national security and democracy, either there are insufficient thermonuclear processes going on, or love to bomb the thread. The same Chinese also love what to blow up the thread but do it peacefully with fireworks for the Spring Festival. But Americans don’t know how. alas alas.
    By the way, Toner sometimes reminds me of Voldemort.
  29. afrikanez
    afrikanez 24 October 2015 19: 13 New
    +2
    Блин, им про ФОМУ а они про ЕРЁМУ! Так ни кто и никогда ни до чего не договорится. Ведь наверняка понимают, что не правы в Сирийском вопросе и один член прут как "бык на красную тряпку". Этот народ кроме денег похоже ни чего и ни когда не интересовал. Когда ж эта клоака провалится в ад? angry
  30. imugn
    imugn 24 October 2015 20: 43 New
    +2
    To destroy a terrorist organization, the Americans needed a coalition from 69 countries and they are proud of it
  31. Stariknv
    Stariknv 24 October 2015 21: 22 New
    +1
    The United States will never agree with Russia in Syria. So the terrorists are their feeding.
  32. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 24 October 2015 22: 09 New
    +3
    I do not consider Obama's regime legitimate! With their flawed and non-transparent election system, a complete lack of control over the government, a very numerous repressive apparatus with almost unlimited powers, and a legislative body completely inadequate! And generally they do not decide for the Syrians !!!