Putin called a big mistake the transfer of US anti-tank complexes to Syrian militants

49
Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the United States began to transfer anti-tank fighting complexes of the Syrian opposition, but this is a big mistake.



“As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank systems tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and teach calculations. I think this is a big mistake. I believe that this weapon will surely fall into the hands of terrorist organizations ", - quotes the Russian president of RIA "News".

"Is it possible to transfer complexes of the fight against aviationMANPADS? I hope not, because the American leadership, although we disagree on many positions, are sensible people and (they) are aware that these weapons can be very quickly in the hands of those who send them against American pilots "He said.

October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.
  • http://bastion-karpenko.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. -4
      23 October 2015 08: 41
      ARENA is a very expensive complex, it needs to be installed, adjusted, tested and tuned, and this takes months that we don’t have. But Tou is an ancient complex that does not have a GOS, but is controlled by wires and how the Arena will behave there - xs ...
      1. +10
        23 October 2015 08: 48
        Oh, come on. Expensive, long. If you really want to ... This topic with the "Arena" since the beginning of the nineties haunted everyone. Especially on this site some representatives of Israel. smile
        It's time already points over i to put.
        And further contracts will pay off with a head.
        1. +11
          23 October 2015 08: 56
          "As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank combat systems with tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and train calculations. I think it is big mistake.

          Well, it means that this opinion will be brought to the attention of the "Western partners" in another accessible way!
          So-called 'King of ATGM TOW' killed in Syria wink
          As a result of the actions of Russian aviation in Syria, the so-called 'King of American anti-tank missiles TOW' Basel Zimmo (Abu Hamza) was killed.

          Abu Hamza, a retired captain, commander of the coastal division headquarters, trained US forces in Turkey to operate US-produced anti-tank guided missiles for operations against government forces in Syria.

          The operation against the command post of militants was carried out in the Jabal al-Akbar region of Lattakia province. As a result of the operation, at least 40 military were killed and many others were injured. http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13940728001103
        2. +3
          23 October 2015 09: 17
          As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank systems with tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and are trained in calculations.

          Oleg Syromolotov said that the possible supply of portable anti-aircraft missile systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists will be considered as direct aiding with all the ensuing consequences.

          The war continues to gain momentum, one step remains, after which the scale of the opposition between the FSA and Russia will reach a new level.
      2. +7
        23 October 2015 08: 54
        “I believe that this weapon will surely fall into the hands of terrorist organizations,” the Russian president, RIA Novosti, quoted the words of the Russian president. "Partners" their mother
        1. +8
          23 October 2015 09: 02
          This is how the opposition’s weapons must be supplied.
      3. +1
        23 October 2015 08: 55
        Quote: hydrox
        ARENA is a very expensive complex, it needs to be installed, adjusted, tested and tuned, and this takes months that we don’t have. But Tou is an ancient complex that does not have a GOS, but is controlled by wires and how the Arena will behave there - xs ...

        Yes, it doesn’t matter to them how much they pay, then their gas stations are Saudis and Qatar, so they won’t cost the price. laughing
      4. +5
        23 October 2015 08: 56
        It will behave perfectly, it is just against Toe, Milan and Hot, in whom Ik the coordinator of the position of the rocket uses the definition of the position of the rocket tracer IR range. And the Shtor complex includes IR spotlights, one of the operating modes of which is just the illumination of these tracers. The complex does not know where the rocket is and cannot adjust its flight.
        1. -16
          23 October 2015 08: 58
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly, it is just against Toe, Milan and Hot, in whom Ik the coordinator of the position of the rocket uses the definition of the position of the rocket tracer IR range. And the Shtor complex includes IR spotlights, one of the operating modes of which is just the illumination of these tracers. The complex does not know where the rocket is and cannot adjust its flight.

          Put-Javelins.
          Shot - forgot. hi
          1. +5
            23 October 2015 09: 09
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.

            They will not deliver the Javelins, it is too expensive, and they themselves will fit, they will deliver only what the Engineer said in order to empty the warehouses.
          2. +7
            23 October 2015 09: 10
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.

            Yeah, Ukraine has already been "delivered" ... wassat Greetings, Alexander.hi On the censor probably mourning.lol
            US President Barack Obama vetoed on the draft defense budget for 2016 year. The bill provided for the allocation of almost $ 300 million to provide assistance to Ukraine in the intelligence and military spheres. This assistance was to include the supply of weapons, ammunition and military equipment.
            https://russian.rt.com/article/125405

            Yes, and amerikosy do not need to do anything, the Saudis almost 14 thousand TOW in the bins.
          3. +2
            23 October 2015 10: 35
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.
            Shot - forgot

            Jiavelin is good only in conditions of constant visibility of the target.
            If the target disappears, it loses its grip during aiming, and the cooling time of the IR head takes place, after which the expensive piece of iron is useless (as with MANPADS).
          4. +3
            23 October 2015 11: 35
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.
            Shot - forgot.

            The spear is expensive. One racket costs $ 50.
        2. 0
          23 October 2015 09: 07
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly

          And how do you see the installation that the Curtains, that the Arena on the T-64 tanks, which are the majority in the Syrian army?
          And again :: we have NO time for re-equipment and modernization.
          1. mvg
            +3
            23 October 2015 10: 30
            t-64 in Syria? Do not confuse anything?
            1. +1
              23 October 2015 11: 36
              Quote: mvg
              t-64 in Syria? Do not confuse anything?

              Maybe T-62? They have about a thousand T-62K, and T-62M.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. -5
          23 October 2015 17: 11
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly, it’s just against Tou, Milan and Hot,

          Yes Yes. And how would this luminous system under its nose help this tank from the ancient TOU? wink

          Quote: hydrox
          Javelins will not deliver, too expensive

          Expensive? So the Americans will print more money for themselves.

          Quote: Engineer
          Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square

          You set the Cornets back in 2006. Have you got something newer? wink
          1. 0
            23 October 2015 20: 24
            Upgraded version of Cornet D.
      5. +3
        23 October 2015 09: 28
        Quote: hydrox
        ARENA is a very expensive complex

        Not more expensive than life
        1. +1
          23 October 2015 10: 42
          "Arena" is not needed there and, in fact, is not there!
          There is enough "Curtains". Well, maybe modify the backlight by adding ultra-violet (maybe already?).
  2. +3
    23 October 2015 08: 35
    Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the United States began to transfer anti-tank fighting complexes of the Syrian opposition, but this is a big mistake.
    For me this is at least strange ... Well, the soldiers were trained. Now most of them are fighting for IS. And now the weapon ... Well, and where will it go, according to the US?
    1. +9
      23 October 2015 08: 45
      Remember Talleyrand's saying "It's worse than a crime - it's a mistake"? Our President, in the language of diplomacy, directly accused the States of a crime ..
    2. +1
      23 October 2015 08: 47
      [quote = Roman1970] [quote] Well, and where does it, according to the United States, get to? [/ quote]
      Where the United States will give, there will fall, in ISIS.
      What Syria lacks is a large number of nimble self-propelled small-caliber artillery systems (57 - 76 mm) with a multi-fragmentation shell (striking elements)
  3. +11
    23 October 2015 08: 37
    Yes, everything is clear to a normal person. Who is on which side. The USA cannot, this country of victorious Satanism, side with the good. Who is the war, and their mother is dear to them.
  4. -2
    23 October 2015 08: 38
    Soak enemies in the toilets!
  5. +3
    23 October 2015 08: 39
    October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.

    MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences. winked
    1. +1
      23 October 2015 08: 49
      Quote: Igor39
      MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences

      Really do not understand the difference between the loss of armored vehicles and aircraft?
      In fact, you should better understand such things on this site. fellow
    2. -5
      23 October 2015 08: 56
      Quote: Igor39
      October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.

      MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences

      In general, I certainly respect Putin. some representatives of the General Staff - as they say - Associate professor is an authoritative thief, but
      And what was he counting on, that one, that the other 7
      The US supports the opposition (or bandits) - to whom which version is more suitable
      Russia - Assad (a legitimate government) or a dictator and illegitimate power - the same as you like
      And if Russia started helping Assad with its Air Force and bombing and fighting primarily with the SSA (and not with ISIS) - someone thinks that the USA and Turkey with the Saudis - will nervously smoke aside, fearing Putin’s accusations of supporting terrorists (yes for them, Assad is a terrorist) and all these stuffing are designed for domestic consumption and no more.
      Therefore, the United States will put the ATGM in order to negate the entire infantry component, and if it is necessary (and this will happen the same) then the MANPADS.
      What did you think?
      Everyone has their own interests, and everyone will defend them, but the question is not which of these parties is Kibalchish, but who is Bad - the question is who has the best chance of success.
      1. +12
        23 October 2015 10: 09
        Alexander. hi My regards.
        I agree with you that America and Russia (USSR) have a good old tradition of supplying the Bad Men and the Kibalchish with all kinds of weapons that are unpleasant for each other. I acknowledge your right to consider Assad a dictator and accomplice of terrorism (I admit that Israel has some reason for this), but tell me, who cuts people's heads on camera, burns them alive and drowns them in cells? Is Assad? Millions of refugees. Really from Assad? Based on those terrible shots broadcast to the whole world, I decided for myself who is who. Therefore, with your phrase:

        "Everyone has their own interests, and everyone will defend them, the question is not which of these sides is Kibalch, and which is Bad - the question is who has more chances of success."

        I disagree categorically. The bad man must be drowned in a barrel of ... jam.
        1. 0
          23 October 2015 13: 59
          Quote: Polite Elk
          but tell me, who cuts people's heads on a camera, burns them alive and drowns them in cages? Is Assad? Millions of refugees. Really from Assad? Based on those terrible shots broadcast to the whole world, I decided for myself who is who. Therefore, with your phrase

          Well, you overestimate Assad too, he rotted away the opposition "peacefully and quietly" in the camps, so 150000 thousand, and quietly ... the supply of weapons to Hezbalah and Hamas does not seem to make him a dove of peace ... so why are they surprised that the neighboring countries in the east are in no hurry to join Iran's protege?
          1. +2
            23 October 2015 14: 33
            Quote: Longmire
            Well, you overestimate Assad too, he rotted away the opposition in the camps "peacefully and quietly", so 150000 thousand, and quietly ...


            Dear Longmire. If you mean the opposition that is now fighting under the banner of Islam against the government forces of Syria, then for some reason I am sorry that he did not rot it all completely "peacefully and quietly." And if you take the "democratic" places of deprivation of liberty belonging to the "fathers of democracy", then I suppose that an order of magnitude more people were ruined there and, moreover, "very quietly."

            Quote: Longmire
            supplies of weapons to hezbollah and Hamas, as it were, also do not make him a dove of peace ...


            These organizations did not supply weapons only lazy. But for some reason, answer Assad. Iran is a much more religiously radical country than secular and largely Christian Syria. Therefore, Syria is closer to me. And yet, I believe that Israel, for example, has a much better chance of resolving peacefully all differences with Assad than with Khomeini. By the way, Iran produces and supplies many times more weapons than Syria (I generally keep quiet about China). But for some reason Assad turned out to be the most bald. I explain this by saying that the strangulation of the pentosa region began with the weaker ones (Iraq, Libya, Syria).
            Assad’s regime also impressed me with the fact that it did not support Chechen fighters in the 1st and 2nd campaigns, which cannot be said about other countries of the Middle East. Something like that.
      2. +4
        23 October 2015 10: 12
        It can be seen where you are from, and your reasoning. am
      3. +2
        23 October 2015 10: 16
        Quote: atalef
        Someone thinks that the United States and Turkey with Saud will nervously smoke aside

        And I think that this is exactly what they will do. Nobody needs Alkaida in Turkey. So the "Muslim brothers" are above the roof. Again, the Kurds do not support this. And Erdogan has seriously lost in political support of the Turks, re-elections are on the way, and the rating does not allow for all functions to be closed, the new prime minister from the opposition will break off almost all military wishes of Erdogan. Yesterday there was already a statement by Erdogan that Assad could temporarily remain in the presidency. The final comedy, so to speak, Erdogan is a man of his word, he wanted to give his word wanted to take it back, and for four years he demanded the departure of Assad.wink
        The SA almost every day in Moscow gets rid of it, because they don’t need the IG inside the country. For the IG, the Doha project. Ours will give more heat with Assad, arrange new elections with Assad, after which all Democrats BV, EU and US will quickly stick their tongues in the ass, when Assad wins.
        Doha, these yes, can foul, but they may have problems in this regard.
        Quote: atalef
        Therefore, the United States will put the ATGM in order to negate the entire infantry component, and if it is necessary (and this will happen the same) then the MANPADS.

        All the military components of the US military budget were cut, the purchase of the F-35 was reduced, and you are talking about the supply of MANPADS, and the whole situation will begin to shmila with these MANPADS for NATO, why not the option, and if the Kurds have landed on the Turks?
        In early November, the Americans are facing a new sequestration of the budget, the national debt ceiling has risen again, not up to Syria now.

  6. Gur
    +2
    23 October 2015 08: 41
    They don’t think the Taliban will get a bunch
  7. 0
    23 October 2015 08: 45
    Well, nothing, the Amers in Afghanistan were shot the same as the Afghans were delivered against us. Here they get the same. So I think they will beware of MANPADS. And I don’t even doubt that the Taliban will fall.
    1. -1
      23 October 2015 09: 49
      What's the point? Mansur after the victory is going to conquer Tajikistan. Take Mullah Omar to crush the whole of Central Asia.

      Which of them will we deliver weapons to? recourse
  8. +3
    23 October 2015 08: 46
    The next move for Russia ?!
    Well, as for the "rest", so that these "gizmos" do not get on the "front", this is a completely different story!
    We will all work!
  9. +1
    23 October 2015 08: 47
    For every action, there is always opposition? We hope that Russia's response will be similar!
  10. 0
    23 October 2015 08: 47
    The days when the United States were perceived by some "allies and partners" are similar. The current actions of Washington are more like a secret war against Russia. In Syria, Russia is trying to help the legitimate government. And the preparation of the "moderate opposition" (which later goes to ISIS) the supply of various weapons (which is later lost and emerges in ISIS) is a war against Russia and its soyuznikov. I will not be surprised if the terrorists have MANPADS. It’s clear from where! The United States has a rich experience of supporting the "mujahideen". negative hi
  11. +1
    23 October 2015 08: 48
    It is necessary to make a reciprocal "mistake" in Afghanistan, through third parties.
    1. +1
      23 October 2015 09: 51
      So to whom to make a mistake? Mansur after the victory already promises to conquer Tajikistan. Mansour is the one who is now a nightmare of the Americans and the Afghan army in the north and is the leader of the Taliban.

      Mullah’s brother lobster and breakaway radicals are now entering Khorasan (Caliphate) - they set the goal to conquer all of Central Asia!

      To which of them does the Cornets and Needles supply?
  12. 0
    23 October 2015 08: 48
    I hope that they will deal with the opposition in the near future
  13. +5
    23 October 2015 08: 58
    The United States, born of terror and genocide, will die of it sooner or later. angry
  14. +2
    23 October 2015 09: 12
    Our opponent wants us to get bogged down in the war (According to their logic, there are some pluses, sanctions are imposed on Russia, low oil prices, slow import substitution, sluggish fight against corruption, plus alignment in Ukraine, now Syria is weakening it all, and for them the arms trade is the first business) Tanks God bless them, they will bring new ones, and tankers cannot be put into operation so quickly. It smells like a protracted war. For me, it is necessary to stop the point strikes, and just start air strikes on the territory of the enemy, and then figure out who is in the general heap, the Americans or some other popos.
    1. 0
      23 October 2015 10: 28
      Give carpet bombing? And what to bomb the desert or the city?
  15. 0
    23 October 2015 09: 20
    The stick has two ends.
    It will easily shoot at its conductor.
  16. +2
    23 October 2015 10: 00
    Quote: atalef

    Put-Javelins.
    Shot - forgot. hi


    Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square hi
    1. 0
      23 October 2015 10: 17
      I support, self-confident too "chosen by God", "experts" are cheap.
    2. -1
      23 October 2015 11: 35
      Quote: Engineer
      Quote: atalef

      Put-Javelins.
      Shot - forgot. hi


      Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square hi

      It may well be, but Hezbollah and Lebanon will then also be squared. Do you think they will agree to such an exchange.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    23 October 2015 12: 14
    MANPADS were already supplied to Afghanistan, however, there was no American aviation there. And in Iraq and Syria it seems like they fly, ISIS supplies ammunition when they don't bomb excavators. But I wonder if the Stingers are put to the opposition, will the Syrian excavator workers quickly master them? Purely for self-defense purposes, of course. I think this old photo will tell you soldier
  18. 0
    23 October 2015 12: 51
    ATGM in skillful hands is a terrible weapon. In semi-automatic mode, it is much dumber, but operator training is much easier. The Shtora complex operates both via optical and infrared channels.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"