Putin called a big mistake the transfer of US anti-tank complexes to Syrian militants

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the United States began to transfer anti-tank fighting complexes of the Syrian opposition, but this is a big mistake.




“As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank systems tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and teach calculations. I think this is a big mistake. I believe that this weapon will surely fall into the hands of terrorist organizations ", - quotes the Russian president of RIA "News".

"Is it possible to transfer complexes of the fight against aviationMANPADS? I hope not, because the American leadership, although we disagree on many positions, are sensible people and (they) are aware that these weapons can be very quickly in the hands of those who send them against American pilots "He said.

October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. hydrox 23 October 2015 08: 41 New
      • -4
      • 0
      -4
      ARENA is a very expensive complex, it needs to be installed, adjusted, tested and tuned, and this takes months that we don’t have. But Tou is an ancient complex that does not have a GOS, but is controlled by wires and how the Arena will behave there - xs ...
      1. Vladimyrych 23 October 2015 08: 48 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        Oh, come on, you. Expensive, long time. If you really want to ... This topic with the "Arena" from the beginning of the nineties does not give everyone peace. Especially on this site to some representatives of Israel. smile
        It's time already points over i to put.
        And further contracts will pay off with a head.
        1. Sid.74 23 October 2015 08: 56 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          "As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank combat systems with tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and train calculations. I think it is big mistake.

          Well, that means that this opinion will be brought to the attention of the "Western partners" in another affordable way!
          In Syria, killed the so-called 'King ATG TOW' wink
          As a result of the actions of Russian aviation in Syria, the so-called 'King of American anti-tank missiles TOW' Basel Zimmo (Abu Hamza) (Basel Zimmo (Abu Hamza)) was killed.

          Abu Hamza, a retired captain, commander of the coastal division headquarters, trained US forces in Turkey to operate US-produced anti-tank guided missiles for operations against government forces in Syria.

          The operation against the command post of militants was carried out in the Jabal al-Akbar region of Lattakia province. As a result of the operation, at least 40 military were killed and many others were injured. http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13940728001103
        2. figwam 23 October 2015 09: 17 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          As far as we know, the US military is already transmitting anti-tank systems with tanks and armored vehicles, armored vehicles, and are trained in calculations.

          Oleg Syromolotov said that the possible supply of portable anti-aircraft missile systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists will be considered as direct aiding with all the ensuing consequences.

          The war continues to gain momentum, one step remains, after which the scale of the opposition between the FSA and Russia will reach a new level.
      2. Pavel Vereshchagin 23 October 2015 08: 54 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        “I believe that these weapons will certainly fall into the hands of terrorist organizations,” the Russian President of RIA Novosti quotes the words of “...... For this, they deliver to the barmels. "Partners" their mother
        1. Pavel Vereshchagin 23 October 2015 09: 02 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          This is how the opposition’s weapons must be supplied.
      3. paxil 23 October 2015 08: 55 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: hydrox
        ARENA is a very expensive complex, it needs to be installed, adjusted, tested and tuned, and this takes months that we don’t have. But Tou is an ancient complex that does not have a GOS, but is controlled by wires and how the Arena will behave there - xs ...

        Yes, it doesn’t matter to them how much they pay, then their gas stations are Saudis and Qatar, so they won’t cost the price. laughing
      4. Engineer 23 October 2015 08: 56 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        It will behave perfectly, it is just against Toe, Milan and Hot, in whom Ik the coordinator of the position of the rocket uses the definition of the position of the rocket tracer IR range. And the Shtor complex includes IR spotlights, one of the operating modes of which is just the illumination of these tracers. The complex does not know where the rocket is and cannot adjust its flight.
        1. atalef 23 October 2015 08: 58 New
          • -16
          • 0
          -16
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly, it is just against Toe, Milan and Hot, in whom Ik the coordinator of the position of the rocket uses the definition of the position of the rocket tracer IR range. And the Shtor complex includes IR spotlights, one of the operating modes of which is just the illumination of these tracers. The complex does not know where the rocket is and cannot adjust its flight.

          Put-Javelins.
          Shot - forgot. hi
          1. hydrox 23 October 2015 09: 09 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.

            They will not deliver the Javelins, it is too expensive, and they themselves will fit, they will deliver only what the Engineer said in order to empty the warehouses.
          2. Sid.74 23 October 2015 09: 10 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.

            Yeah, Ukraine has already been "put" ... wassat Greetings, Alexander.hi On the censor probably mourning.lol
            US President Barack Obama vetoed on the draft defense budget for 2016 year. The bill provided for the allocation of almost $ 300 million to provide assistance to Ukraine in the intelligence and military spheres. This assistance was to include the supply of weapons, ammunition and military equipment.
            https://russian.rt.com/article/125405

            Yes, and amerikosy do not need to do anything, the Saudis almost 14 thousand TOW in the bins.
          3. Genry 23 October 2015 10: 35 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.
            Shot - forgot

            Jiavelin is good only in conditions of constant visibility of the target.
            If the target disappears, it loses its grip during aiming, and the cooling time of the IR head takes place, after which the expensive piece of iron is useless (as with MANPADS).
          4. zennon 23 October 2015 11: 35 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: atalef
            Put-Javelins.
            Shot - forgot.

            The spear is expensive. One racket costs $ 50.
        2. hydrox 23 October 2015 09: 07 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly

          And how do you see the installation that the Curtains, that the Arena on the T-64 tanks, which are the majority in the Syrian army?
          And again :: we have NO time for re-equipment and modernization.
          1. mvg
            mvg 23 October 2015 10: 30 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            t-64 in Syria? Do not confuse anything?
            1. zennon 23 October 2015 11: 36 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: mvg
              t-64 in Syria? Do not confuse anything?

              Maybe T-62? They have about a thousand T-62K, and T-62M.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Professor 23 October 2015 17: 11 New
          • -5
          • 0
          -5
          Quote: Engineer
          It will behave perfectly, it’s just against Tou, Milan and Hot,

          Yes Yes. And how would this luminous system under its nose help this tank from the ancient TOU? wink

          Quote: hydrox
          Javelins will not deliver, too expensive

          Expensive? So the Americans will print more money for themselves.

          Quote: Engineer
          Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square

          You set the Cornets back in 2006. Have you got something newer? wink
          1. Vadim237 23 October 2015 20: 24 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Upgraded version of Cornet D.
      5. sssla 23 October 2015 09: 28 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: hydrox
        ARENA is a very expensive complex

        Not more expensive than life
        1. Genry 23 October 2015 10: 42 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          The “Arena” is not needed there and it is actually not there!
          There are "Curtains" enough. Well, maybe modify the flare by adding ultra-violet (maybe already?).
  2. Roman1970 23 October 2015 08: 35 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the United States began to transfer anti-tank fighting complexes of the Syrian opposition, but this is a big mistake.
    For me this is at least strange ... Well, the soldiers were trained. Now most of them are fighting for IS. And now the weapon ... Well, and where will it go, according to the US?
    1. Penetrator 23 October 2015 08: 45 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Remember Talleyrand’s statement, “This is worse than a crime - it’s a mistake”? Our President, in the language of diplomacy, directly accused the States of a crime ..
    2. hydrox 23 October 2015 08: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      [quote = Roman1970] [quote] Well, and where does it, according to the United States, get to? [/ quote]
      Where the United States will give, there will fall, in ISIS.
      What Syria lacks is a large number of nimble self-propelled small-caliber artillery systems (57 - 76 mm) with a multi-fragmentation shell (striking elements)
  3. VseDoFeNi 23 October 2015 08: 37 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Yes, everything is clear to a normal person. Who is on which side. The USA cannot, this country of victorious Satanism, side with the good. Who is the war, and their mother is dear to them.
  4. Reptiloid 23 October 2015 08: 38 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Soak enemies in the toilets!
  5. Igor39 23 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.

    MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences. winked
    1. hydrox 23 October 2015 08: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Igor39
      MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences

      Really do not understand the difference between the loss of armored vehicles and aircraft?
      In fact, you should better understand such things on this site. fellow
    2. atalef 23 October 2015 08: 56 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      Quote: Igor39
      October 16, Deputy Foreign Minister for Counter Terrorism Oleg Syromolotov, said that a possible supply of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to Syrian terrorists would be viewed as a direct complicity with all the ensuing consequences.

      MANPADS, ATGM what's the difference, waiting for the consequences

      In general, I certainly respect Putin. some representatives of the General Staff - as they say - Associate professor is an authoritative thief, but
      And what was he counting on, that one, that the other 7
      The US supports the opposition (or bandits) - to whom which version is more suitable
      Russia - Assad (a legitimate government) or a dictator and illegitimate power - the same as you like
      And if Russia started helping Assad with its Air Force and bombing and fighting primarily with the SSA (and not with ISIS) - someone thinks that the USA and Turkey with the Saudis - will nervously smoke aside, fearing Putin’s accusations of supporting terrorists (yes for them, Assad is a terrorist) and all these stuffing are designed for domestic consumption and no more.
      Therefore, the United States will put the ATGM in order to negate the entire infantry component, and if it is necessary (and this will happen the same) then the MANPADS.
      What did you think?
      Everyone has their own interests, and everyone will defend them, but the question is not which of these parties is Kibalchish, but who is Bad - the question is who has the best chance of success.
      1. Polite Moose 23 October 2015 10: 09 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Alexander. hi My regards.
        I agree with you that America and Russia (USSR) have a good old tradition of supplying the Bad Men and the Kibalchish with all kinds of weapons that are unpleasant for each other. I acknowledge your right to consider Assad a dictator and accomplice of terrorism (I admit that Israel has some reason for this), but tell me, who cuts people's heads on camera, burns them alive and drowns them in cells? Is Assad? Millions of refugees. Really from Assad? Based on those terrible shots broadcast to the whole world, I decided for myself who is who. Therefore, with your phrase:

        "Everyone has their own interests, and everyone will defend them, but the question is not which of these parties is Kibalchish, but who is Bad - the question is who has the best chance of success."

        I disagree categorically. The bad man must be drowned in a barrel of ... jam.
        1. Longmire 23 October 2015 13: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Polite Moose
          but tell me, who cuts people's heads on a camera, burns them alive and drowns them in cages? Is Assad? Millions of refugees. Really from Assad? Based on those terrible shots broadcast to the whole world, I decided for myself who is who. Therefore, with your phrase

          Well, you also overestimate Assad, he rotted the opposition “peacefully and quietly” in the camps, so 150000 thousand, and quietly ... deliveries of weapons to Hezbollah and Hamas, as it were, also do not make him a dove of peace ... so why are you surprised that the neighboring countries the east are not in a hurry to appoint an alliance to the protege of Iran?
          1. Polite Moose 23 October 2015 14: 33 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Longmire
            Well, you also overestimate Assad, he in the camps rotted the opposition "peacefully and quietly", so 150000 thousand, and quietly ...


            Dear Longmire. If you mean the opposition, which is now under the banner of Islam, is fighting against the Syrian government, for some reason I am sorry that he did not rot it all completely "peacefully and quietly." And if we take the "democratic" places of deprivation of liberty belonging to the "fathers of democracy", then I think that there were many more people killed and, moreover, "very quiet."

            Quote: Longmire
            supplies of weapons to hezbollah and Hamas, as it were, also do not make him a dove of peace ...


            These organizations did not supply weapons only lazy. But for some reason, answer Assad. Iran is a much more religiously radical country than secular and largely Christian Syria. Therefore, Syria is closer to me. And yet, I believe that Israel, for example, has a much better chance of resolving peacefully all differences with Assad than with Khomeini. By the way, Iran produces and supplies many times more weapons than Syria (I generally keep quiet about China). But for some reason Assad turned out to be the most bald. I explain this by saying that the strangulation of the pentosa region began with the weaker ones (Iraq, Libya, Syria).
            Assad’s regime also impressed me with the fact that it did not support Chechen fighters in the 1st and 2nd campaigns, which cannot be said about other countries of the Middle East. Something like that.
      2. Zheka40 23 October 2015 10: 12 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        It can be seen where you are from, and your reasoning. am
      3. Sid.74 23 October 2015 10: 16 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        Someone thinks that the United States and Turkey with Saud will nervously smoke aside

        And I think that this is exactly what they will do and they will be. Alkaida in Turkey nobody needs nafig. So "Muslim Brothers" are above the roof. Again, the Kurds do not support this. Yes, Erdogan seriously lost political support for the Turks, reelection on the nose, but the rating does not allow all functions to be closed, the opposition’s new Prime Minister almost all Erdogan’s warlords will break off. Erdogan’s statement yesterday that Assad may temporarily remain as president. Finita la comedy, so to speak, Erdogan is a man of words, wanted to give the word, wanted took back .A four years Well demanded Assad's departure.wink
        The SA almost every day in Moscow gets rid of it, because they don’t need the IG inside the country. For the IG, the Doha project. Ours will give more heat with Assad, arrange new elections with Assad, after which all Democrats BV, EU and US will quickly stick their tongues in the ass, when Assad wins.
        Doha, these yes, can foul, but they may have problems in this regard.
        Quote: atalef
        Therefore, the United States will put the ATGM in order to negate the entire infantry component, and if it is necessary (and this will happen the same) then the MANPADS.

        All the military components of the US military budget were cut, the purchase of the F-35 was reduced, and you are talking about the supply of MANPADS, and the whole situation will begin to shmila with these MANPADS for NATO, why not the option, and if the Kurds have landed on the Turks?
        In early November, the Americans are facing a new sequestration of the budget, the national debt ceiling has risen again, not up to Syria now.

  6. Gur
    Gur 23 October 2015 08: 41 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    They don’t think the Taliban will get a bunch
  7. alex-cn 23 October 2015 08: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, nothing, the Amers in Afghanistan were shot the same as the Afghans were delivered against us. Here they get the same. So I think they will beware of MANPADS. And I don’t even doubt that the Taliban will fall.
    1. donavi49 23 October 2015 09: 49 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      What's the point? Mansur after the victory is going to conquer Tajikistan. Take Mullah Omar to crush the whole of Central Asia.

      Which of them will we deliver weapons to? recourse
  8. asar 23 October 2015 08: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The next move for Russia ?!
    Well, but in the "rest", so that these "gizmos" do not fall on the "front", this is a completely different story!
    We will all work!
  9. Neophyte 23 October 2015 08: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    For every action, there is always opposition? We hope that Russia's response will be similar!
  10. fa2998 23 October 2015 08: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The times are similar when the US was perceived by some “allies and partners” to be gone. Washington’s current actions are more like a secret war against Russia. In Syria, Russia is trying to help a legitimate government. And the preparation of a “moderate opposition” (which later goes to ISIS), the supply of various weapons (which is subsequently lost and pops up into ISIS) is a war against Russia and its allies. I won’t be surprised if the terrorists have MANPADS. It’s clear where! The USA has rich experience in supporting the “Mujahideen”. negative hi
  11. Tummyr 23 October 2015 08: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is necessary to make a response "mistake" in Afghanistan, through third parties.
    1. donavi49 23 October 2015 09: 51 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So to whom to make a mistake? Mansur after the victory already promises to conquer Tajikistan. Mansour is the one who is now a nightmare of the Americans and the Afghan army in the north and is the leader of the Taliban.

      Mullah’s brother lobster and breakaway radicals are now entering Khorasan (Caliphate) - they set the goal to conquer all of Central Asia!

      To which of them does the Cornets and Needles supply?
  12. EDDI 76 23 October 2015 08: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I hope that they will deal with the opposition in the near future
  13. ivan bogomolov 23 October 2015 08: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The United States, born of terror and genocide, will die of it sooner or later. angry
  14. Gor-1974 23 October 2015 09: 12 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Our opponent wants us to get bogged down in the war (According to their logic, there are some pluses, sanctions are imposed on Russia, low oil prices, slow import substitution, sluggish fight against corruption, plus alignment in Ukraine, now Syria is weakening it all, and for them the arms trade is the first business) Tanks God bless them, they will bring new ones, and tankers cannot be put into operation so quickly. It smells like a protracted war. For me, it is necessary to stop the point strikes, and just start air strikes on the territory of the enemy, and then figure out who is in the general heap, the Americans or some other popos.
    1. AID.S 23 October 2015 10: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Give carpet bombing? And what to bomb the desert or the city?
  15. individual 23 October 2015 09: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The stick has two ends.
    It will easily shoot at its conductor.
  16. Engineer 23 October 2015 10: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: atalef

    Put-Javelins.
    Shot - forgot. hi


    Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square hi
    1. Zheka40 23 October 2015 10: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I support, self-confident too "God-chosen", "experts" are cheap.
    2. Aaron Zawi 23 October 2015 11: 35 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Quote: Engineer
      Quote: atalef

      Put-Javelins.
      Shot - forgot. hi


      Look, so that we don’t put someone at Hezbollah, otherwise it will be 2006 for you in the square hi

      It may well be, but Hezbollah and Lebanon will then also be squared. Do you think they will agree to such an exchange.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  17. Earnest 23 October 2015 12: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    MANPADS were already delivered to Afghanistan, however, American aircraft were not there. And in Iraq and Syria, it seems like they are flying, ISIS supplies ammunition when excavators do not bomb. But I wonder if the opposition “Stingers” put the Syrian excavators quickly master them? Exclusively for self-defense, of course. I think this old photo will tell soldier
  18. Mountain shooter 23 October 2015 12: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ATGM in capable hands is a terrible weapon. In semiautomatic mode - much dumber, but operator training is much simpler. The Shtora complex works both on an optical, and on the IR channel.