But we are not talking about Kurginyan, oddly enough. It will be a question of the statement of Igor Korotchenko, who can only be accused of being unpatriotic if he does not know him. Or a sectarian who had created an idol in the form of a photo of a man in camouflage on the wall, in spite of his holy scripture.
So, Igor Korotchenko said in his characteristic manner that Igor Strelkov's interview about the Novorossia project was a betrayal of Russia.
“There should be one principle: my country, Russia, rights are ALWAYS. To desire the defeat of your army is a betrayal. The Ukrainian press with anti-Russian gloating and happily quotes Strelkova. So a man says and does something wrong! ”
Korochenko explains his indignation at the conclusions Strelkov made in an interview with one of the TV channels. True, "Roy TV" TV channel is difficult to call, but nonetheless. If someone wants to understand thoroughly what caused such a negative on the part of the respected Igor Yuryevich, he will be able to watch an hour and a half of the vangovaniye of Strelkov and El-Murid. Or Girkin and Nesmiyana. Who is more convenient.
Just a few quotes from Mr. Girkin recorded during the transfer.
"Russia in Syria, except for defeat, does not shine. Moscow has neither material nor human resources to get out of Syrian porridge without burns."
"In this war, it is generally impossible to win a final victory, and defeat will be very likely. In addition, after a while it will turn out that the invested resources" go nowhere ", both material and human. And thirdly, the moral effect of defeat "Rastiarennoy" war will affect the situation inside the country. "
"The Moscow bosses have" deliberately degraded "divisions of the armies of people's republics and brought them to an incapable state."
"The Syrian war has a direct bearing on Novorossia. After losing in Syria, Russia will lose Novorossia. After losing, Novorossia will lose Crimea. The loss of Crimea is the beginning of the collapse of Russia."
"We cannot win with the available forces and means in Syria, in the conditions of the confrontation between the United States and Ukraine. This threatens with the greatest military-political defeat."
Basically, enough. If someone wants more - please. Personally, I had enough. When discussing the issue of recruiting mercenaries in the Donbas, the references to Ekho Moskvy and Business FM were especially impressed. And the mention in the context of the speeches of the words "Russia", "Moscow", "Kremlin", "Moscow heads". Strange branch. It turns out that Girkin is a patriot, but as if detached from Moscow, Russia and others.
Actually, it is not surprising that Korotchenko was so indignant. The normal reaction of a normal patriot. I hope the readers will not deny this to Igor Yuryevich?
At least, ukroSMI Igor Korotchenko not quoted. But Igor Girkin - already. And the further, the more willing. Of course, in Ukraine, anyone will be quoted if he predicts the collapse of Russia. So today Girkin is really in trend. At least, the Internet resources began to pay attention to him. And even deputies Glad to quote and comment.
Good is not enough. In principle, the people have become accustomed to Girkin’s statements on the topic “everything is lost, and we will all die”. But while it concerned only Donbass, still fine. It seems like a person in the subject. Was at least. But Donbass, so many times already buried by Girkin, is still alive. Yes, the situation there is not delightful, but far from the predictions of Igor Vsevolodovich. And frank funeral klikuschestva really begin to strain.
To any thinking and sober-minded person it is clear that the conflict in Syria cannot be stopped in a month or two. A civil war on a religious platform is not a conflict between two organized crime groups sharing spheres of influence. This is a long time. But where does the Russian army?
Igor, who Korotchenko, really plows on the information front just on the side of the Russian army. Telling, showing, analyzing. And really is in this area a connoisseur and authority. Yes, and a patriot. For it is impossible, without being it, day after day to inform those who read, look and listen, that our army is becoming like in the song. Enduring and legendary. And his reproaches to the namesake, which Girkin, and relevant, and fair.
So maybe Kurginyan was not so wrong about Girkin-Strelkov in his time?