On the basis of T-72 and T-90 will be created machines to combat robots

Deputy General Director of Uralvagonzavod for special equipment Vyacheslav Khalitov said that on the basis of tanks T-72 and T-90 will be created combat vehicles equipped with the latest 57-mm combat module "Baikal".




We will install the “Baikal” module on the T-72 and T-90 chassis - this is a unique fire support machine due to the 57-mm high-ballistics and ammunition cannon — multifunctionality immediately appears, which means effective combat against air targets such as drones, and ground-based robotic complexes ", - quotes him as RIA "News".

The gun of high ballistics of the new combat module "Baikal" will have a range of 16 kilometers through the air and 6 kilometers of land and increased ammunition.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arktidianets 22 October 2015 09: 38 New
    • 31
    • 0
    +31
    And the chassis is not great for such a module? Although there is not much protection.
    1. jjj
      jjj 22 October 2015 09: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      But interestingly, no tricky ammunition for this business was bungled? If so, you get a very interesting car
    2. Now we are free 22 October 2015 09: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      hi Vladimir!
      Credit, capacious and motivating picture laughing laughing laughing
    3. i80186 22 October 2015 09: 50 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Arctidian
      And the chassis is not great for such a module? Although there is not much protection.

      They also promise to put it on the T-15. 5:49 talk about the 57 mm gun.
    4. D-Master 22 October 2015 10: 25 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Photo is just great.)))
      About the chassis. It already exists, is being produced for a long time and has been well mastered, and there is a huge resource and repair base. Than produce a huge number of different platforms, it is easier to work with one reliable.
    5. Genry 22 October 2015 10: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Arctidian
      And the chassis is not great for such a module?

      The chassis, for the 57mm machine, should be diverse. Caterpillar, wheeled, helicopter, aircraft, ....
  2. MIKHAN 22 October 2015 09: 38 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It’s a good thing, of course, but it seems to me that our military-industrial complex has things cooler (for fighting robots and all other evil spirits ..) ... Our some kind of suspicious satellites fly near the American! bully
    1. hydrox 22 October 2015 09: 41 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Our satellites some kind of suspicious fly, near the American!

      Do not confuse: outer space - outer space, this is a separate conversation.
      And the T-72 chassis was well thought out, we have 100500 such chassis, they will even remain.
      1. MIKHAN 22 October 2015 09: 57 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: hydrox
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Our satellites some kind of suspicious fly, near the American!

        Do not confuse: outer space - outer space, this is a separate conversation.
        Well, I don’t know .. Robots are mostly controlled via satellites? And if the signal is intercepted or stopped, then it’s just a pile of iron and plastic ... Or am I wrong?
        1. Genry 22 October 2015 10: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          All satellites cannot be blocked.
          It is possible to provide communication without satellites.
          Artificial intelligence allows you to completely puzzle the drone at the time of launch.
    2. figwam 22 October 2015 09: 42 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Like this ...
  3. Engineer 22 October 2015 09: 39 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Well, a suitable platform for such a powerful and rapid-firing gun. Nevertheless, the BMP is too light a platform for conducting aimed automatic fire from such a gun. Wangyu will spark and a solid ammunition, i.e. modern version of the ZSU-57-2
    1. Rader 22 October 2015 21: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, BMPs are the same different. For the T-15, 57mm is suitable (a tank heavy base will allow the effective use of a gun of this caliber). As for the car, which will turn out after installing the new BM in the 72nd / 90th case, this looks like a new BMPT, with advanced capabilities to combat air targets. In short, we are waiting for more information on this interesting project. good
  4. MIKHAN 22 October 2015 09: 43 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    There is still no reception against scrap ...
  5. Reserve buildbat 22 October 2015 09: 45 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I did not understand the news. It has been said more than once that the Baikal module is planned to be installed on the BMPT and BPM Armata and Kurganets. BMPT - base T-72 and T-90.
  6. Trigger-Happy 22 October 2015 09: 47 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    16 km by air is very strong! I can’t imagine how it is possible at such ranges to calculate ballistics for a moving maneuvering target ......
    1. GRAY 22 October 2015 09: 52 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Trigger-Happy
      16 km by air is very strong! I can’t imagine how it is possible at such ranges to calculate ballistics for a moving maneuvering target ......

      Remote blasting is our fso. smile
  7. nivander 22 October 2015 09: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    THE CONCEPT OF A JET JET WAS VERY POPULAR IN THE 70-80 YEARS
  8. tchoni 22 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All the same, the idea of ​​BMPT does not leave minds .... Mdya .... Although, still 57 mm is better than 30. Yes, and if you do not get carried away with quantity and establish a decent suo, you will get a very necessary device. Since the "armature" did not make a decent angle of vertical aiming guns. I hope that at least Bk will be removed from the crew?
  9. AlexTires 22 October 2015 09: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Now we are not defenseless before the Skynet! laughing
    1. MIKHAN 22 October 2015 10: 06 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: AlexTires
      Now we are not defenseless before the Skynet! laughing

      That's right .. We are very foolish! hi
  10. NEXUS 22 October 2015 10: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Baikal module with a 57 mm cannon is serious. On the T-15 they will put it instead of the module with a 30 mm cannon. And if there are 4 or more Attack anti-tank missiles, then such an aggregate will not be priced. I’m thinking if they put such a paired cannon on the Terminator than a destroyer of robots, UAVs, and even tanks, if there is a missile arsenal for Baikal?
    1. Genry 22 October 2015 11: 24 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Do not make the tower heavier. On the contrary, it is necessary to provide the smallest possible weight in order to increase the reaction to quickly and unexpectedly appearing targets.
      Missiles are rarely needed and predicted. In an active battle, they will become useless when they are hit by bullets and fragments. Let them be in the second line, on a lighter chassis, with the possibility of quick maneuvering.
  11. pv1005 22 October 2015 10: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is an order and TTZ for such a machine from MO - ???
    Will be created - most likely yes.
    Will be adopted - a big question.
    Visit the BT museum in Kubinka and see how many experienced objects fall on one taken into service.
  12. mark1 22 October 2015 10: 19 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    I understand - the 57 mm module looks promising, but why reduce the firepower of the tank? A standard 125mm for fighting robots is not good? There is a good direction - the T-72 robotization (90), to develop a still good guided munition and no need to spend extra people's money with a dubious outcome.
    1. Genry 22 October 2015 10: 50 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: mark1
      A standard 125mm for fighting robots is not good?

      For air targets?
      For quick, easy and multiple purposes? (infantry, convoy of machine guns with kk machine guns)
      For hidden purposes? (bushes, trees, ruins, roofs, windows)

      In your opinion, nuclear ammunition will be the most optimal ...
      1. mark1 22 October 2015 12: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Genry
        For air targets?

        Managed PSU why not, in addition, a machine gun module is installed on the roof.
        Quote: Genry
        For quick, easy and multiple purposes? (infantry, convoy of machine guns with machine guns

        This is just a regular gun and will fit perfectly. Or do you think that they need to be piece by piece, like a cockroach with a slipper, to beat?
        Quote: Genry
        For hidden purposes? (bushes, trees, ruins, roofs, windows

        Well, if only roofs and windows, and if only a short distance in the village. And again, what is the bad module on the roof?
        Quote: Genry
        In your opinion, the nuclear weapon will be
        the most optimal ...

        It is not in the tank’s tank and it’s not necessary, but a good guided ammunition of 125 mm caliber can solve almost all the tasks you set.
  13. yanus 22 October 2015 10: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, what the hell is this on a tank?
    If this is done as an air defense system against UAVs, isn’t it easier to modify the "Armor" and "Shilka"? And then somehow dofiga air defense systems work.
    Anyway, the tank base for such a module is redundant. Take the BMP-3, weigh it with dynamic armor (well, it will not swim and will not) and normal. This is if all this "miracle" is conceived as an air defense system.
    1. Genry 22 October 2015 11: 12 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      We must put it (57mm cannon) on the "Taetu" and put you to fight there!
      You need to know what this gun is capable of and then speak ...
      This is a rapid-fire machine for active combat in the attack line. Why the hell to put it on a weakly protected platform?
  14. slaw14 22 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In fact, this is a modified ship’s gun S-60, who served in the Navy know this miracle. The module itself was planned to be made uninhabited for the BMP T-15. Why install it on a tank platform? I did not understand the ending - I always thought that the horizontal range exceeds the range for air targets.
  15. Tjeck 22 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I hope a fake .. we have a t-90 today, one-two, and it turned out to be a bit more than the canned t-62/64 did not please them? But when at least 500-700pcs T-14 will be built, you can think about it .. and don’t have to drool here, the tank, unlike this module, is a universal thing.
  16. Trigger-Happy 22 October 2015 13: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: GRAY
    Quote: Trigger-Happy
    16 km by air is very strong! I can’t imagine how it is possible at such ranges to calculate ballistics for a moving maneuvering target ......

    Remote blasting is our fso. smile

    .. yes it’s logical, but still it will be difficult to calculate the place of the detonation and bring the trajectory of the projectile to the maneuvering target. Here the theory of probability comes into force.
  17. aziatt 22 October 2015 14: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Arctidian
    And the chassis is not great for such a module? Although there is not much protection.


    At one time I was there in practice with the union, the Armies is really the best, although it looks ugly, but the citizen shit, especially the excavator eo 5126, this asshole is already tired of it, and they introduced a ban on the import of TT.
  18. Zomanus 23 October 2015 04: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Great car will work.
    Where the tank gun is frankly redundant.
    Plus the tower is uninhabited.
    Plus dofig ammunition, different.
    Plus high ballistics, for the city the most.
    Do not be surprised if it will be tested in Syria.