Russian ambassador: London refused to Moscow in a request to provide information on targets in Syria

Britain refused to cooperate with the Russian Federation in providing information about the objects of the "Islamic state" in Syria, reports RIA News statement by the Russian ambassador to London, Alexander Yakovenko, made by him on the Russia 24 channel.




“We are actively working with the British on the Syrian issue. My contacts, in particular, in the Foreign Office, show that while this work is not very successful, because my last meetings, it was just a week ago, when I spoke with the leadership of the Foreign Office, we raised two questions: the first question is so that the British actively cooperate with us in terms of specifying targets to be beaten in Syria with the aim of destroying ISIS. Unfortunately, I received a negative response to this. The British said that they would not cooperate with us on this issue ",
said Yakovenko.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Haettenschweiler 21 October 2015 17: 17 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    - It could not have been otherwise. England always, in every period of its history, harmed Russia. They especially liked to fight with the wrong hands - with Napoleon, with Hitler ... Tommy definitely can not be trusted.
    1. tongilguk 21 October 2015 17: 23 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Well, and with whom is Britain fighting after such a statement, with ISIS or what?
      1. Vend 21 October 2015 17: 30 New
        • 22
        • 0
        +22
        Quote: tongilguk
        Well, and with whom is Britain fighting after such a statement, with ISIS or what?

        Of course with ISIS, a couple against Syria laughing
        1. Sober 21 October 2015 17: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Witty, plus.
        2. vovanpain 21 October 2015 18: 59 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Quote: Wend
          Quote: tongilguk
          Well, and with whom is Britain fighting after such a statement, with ISIS or what?

          Of course with ISIS, a couple against Syria laughing

          So we need to beat all the barmaley, and the devils in hell will figure out who is the igil, who is from al-Qaeda, who is a moderate oppositionist, and who is a British or American instructor. And they did not care, they were asked, they did not answer.
      2. subbtin.725 21 October 2015 17: 30 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue, "

        After the British Elizabeth compared our president with Hitler, which, of course, put her beloved in a tricky position in the eyes of the world community, there was no other expectation. They with amers created this ill-fated ISIS. Well, they will be their own brainchild, do it yourself and ruin?
      3. Cossack Ermak 21 October 2015 17: 36 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Almost all the headquarters of the so-called “moderate opposition” are located in London.
    2. MIKHAN 21 October 2015 17: 24 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      And Israel and Carter provided us ...))))) You somehow agree among themselves, otherwise the cards are already going nowhere, damn you! bully
      1. Andrea 21 October 2015 17: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I think so ... the king is apparently naked. There is nothing to offer.
        Previously, their positions in the Middle East were strong, but colonial times were over.
      2. Temples 21 October 2015 17: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        So there’s nothing to provide, that’s not what they provide.
        007 was busy. bully
        Now 007 drives there and put things in order. wassat
    3. vodolaz 21 October 2015 17: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, who would doubt it. Those corrupt skins. They think they will save the fact that they are on the island.
    4. GSH-18 21 October 2015 18: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Unless commanded from Fashington, unfortunately, the “initiative” will not appear in Lochdon. How bitter to look at the former "proud" rulers of half the world (owners of colonies in America, etc.) who are now blown away by the rubbish! Ugh, look disgusting! Classical puppets of the American metropolis.
      1. BARKHAN 21 October 2015 20: 10 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        But it’s absolutely not disgusting for me to look at them ... I really enjoy watching the streets of London, Paris, Berlin ... these huge crowds of bearded men and women in burqa ... young and strong Arabs of refugees ... Right I’ll enjoy pop food with their future idyll ... All these proud, swaggering and arrogant former colonialists will soon feel the irony of fate in their own skin. And I am not at all sorry for all this cesspool of perverts. After our huge losses in the Second World War during the liberation of Europe, they should wear Russian on their hands forever. But the vile nature degenerated into geyropeytsev and Tolerast. Let them disentangle. And most likely we will have to put a wall on the border ...
    5. marlin1203 21 October 2015 19: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And what are they working with us in general? In my opinion, nothing. Only crazy capital attract and runaway oligarchs hide.
  2. Kenji 21 October 2015 17: 17 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Duck until the owner from the United States orders them and they won’t say a word, the Yankees have been under the heel for so many years that at the time and in truth they will be renamed to Small Britain.
    1. Penetrator 21 October 2015 17: 25 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      But I do not agree! The British have always been regarded in the Western world as specialists in the Middle East and Asia Minor, and it is not known who is listening to whom - the States are to Britain or vice versa. It’s another matter that the Britons do not have specialists at the Lawrence of Arabia level, so all of their recent projects like the Muslim Brotherhood fail. Well, relative, of course.
      1. Sober 21 October 2015 18: 03 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Ah, I agree with you!
    2. Siberian 21 October 2015 18: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The strong impression is that neither one nor the other has anything to imagine, and Internet sketches are no longer solid. From this mystery is covered with moss.
  3. Armored optimist 21 October 2015 17: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Englishwoman crap!
  4. Vladimyrych 21 October 2015 17: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, Britons are not Israelis not in the Middle East live. On the island. They think the shaitans will not get them. Let them err on. hi
  5. Gor-1974 21 October 2015 17: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Our campaign is already taking orders, from those who wish))) Who to bomb.
    1. Penetrator 21 October 2015 17: 20 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Gor-1974
      Our campaign is already taking orders, from those who wish))) Who to bomb.

      On a commercial basis? laughing
      1. GSH-18 21 October 2015 19: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Penetrator
        Quote: Gor-1974
        Our campaign is already taking orders, from those who wish))) Who to bomb.

        On a commercial basis? laughing

        And why not, with the appropriate military and information support of our Air Force company? The main thing here is the PROTECTION of our (really HEROES) military pilots !!! And only under this condition you can do things! IMHO. yes
  6. SAM 5 21 October 2015 17: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue, "

    Yes and x ... on them. I think we can.
  7. Dimontius 21 October 2015 17: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    and what did you expect independence from foggy albion? Ha! those times-times of the British Empire have passed. no
    1. Sober 21 October 2015 18: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, the British have passed. Ah, there is no backstage.
  8. koksalek 21 October 2015 17: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, who will point to their own brainchild
  9. A-Sim 21 October 2015 17: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Just not to interfere. And help from them, as usual, will not be.
  10. Siga77 21 October 2015 17: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Such s * huddled with hatred and fear and squeaked with a nasty trembling voice: we will not give up "our charm"!
  11. mamont5 21 October 2015 17: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    So for them, one goal in Syria is B. Assad. But Russia’s goals are directly opposite, which is what these "sirs" are to talk about ...
    1. tongilguk 21 October 2015 17: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do they really have whom Assad to replace? All ears already buzzed that Assad should leave. And who will rake instead of him. Are the brave Anglo-Saxons really?
  12. nahalenok911 21 October 2015 17: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So the oil painting "Hu from hu" is drawn. We will manage without you, "infidels", but then Mir will do without you.
  13. Black Colonel 21 October 2015 17: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, since the request is denied, it means for the Britons a no-fly zone over Syria! am am am
  14. s.melioxin 21 October 2015 17: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the first question is that the British should actively cooperate with us in terms of specifying the goals for which they should be beaten in Syria in order to destroy ISIS. Unfortunately, I received a negative answer to this. The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue, "
    To ask a question is all right. But what result could they count on? Only NO. But they do not like RUSSIA.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. semuil 21 October 2015 17: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Of course, we don’t need any of their goals, cards, but we need to touch it.
  17. barclay 21 October 2015 17: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I think that the Anglo-Saxons are too arrogant and arrogant to cooperate with anyone. These rats are on their own mind. Their plans are to spoil every crevice for their own benefit.
    “There can be only one thing worse than enmity with Anglo-Saxon - friendship with him” A.E. Edrichin-Wandam. Major General (1917)
    To this phrase you can add the word "cooperation"
  18. andron72 21 October 2015 17: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    why do we need them only shoes morale about them angry
  19. Dembel 21 October 2015 17: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, now do not complain about blows to the so-called "moderate" opposition. As the saying goes - "whoever has not hidden is not my fault." There, in Syria, besides ISIS, there are a lot of all kinds of groups lured by the West - it will hurt everyone.
  20. starshina pv 21 October 2015 17: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Damn, with England, in general, there is no need to have any business !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! few examples or what?
  21. BOB044 21 October 2015 17: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How to conduct a couple of ISIS attacks in the UK. Start screaming for yourself, take Russia our data. Unless of course they have them. But it’s a pity that people will suffer because of politics. And so it is.
  22. Stinger 21 October 2015 17: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For bastards consider
  23. GDV
    GDV 21 October 2015 17: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Saxons are old and kind ... partner.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. bubla5 21 October 2015 18: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The British always supported pirates, fascists, now terrorists
  26. barsik92090 21 October 2015 18: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, and with whom is Britain fighting after such a statement, with ISIS or what? [/ Quote]
    They can’t say with whom they are definitely fighting, they find targets visually during the flight, everything that moves and moves is terribly alarming, but they cannot formulate this.
  27. noWAR 21 October 2015 18: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    These are eternal dirty tricks, cooperation with them is a waste of time, if not worse.
  28. Reserve buildbat 21 October 2015 18: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Small-shaven refused to provide information))) Still !!! They are not "representatives of intellectual non-elites" to tell where their full-time employees are! It’s clear that, at those points, the control emitters will be suddenly applied.
  29. roskot 21 October 2015 18: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Who will share with their relatives. Dad said silently and shut his mouth.
  30. tolmachiev51 21 October 2015 18: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They have no goals, like mattresses, they fly somewhere bombing !!! They make money there, and ISIS kicks them.
  31. Andryukha G 21 October 2015 18: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The Americans offered to communicate to pilots in Syria in English.
    1. Alexey RA 21 October 2015 19: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Andryukha G
      The Americans offered to communicate to pilots in Syria in English.

      Lets Mi Speak From May Hart English. laughing
  32. GEORGE 21 October 2015 18: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Wend
    Quote: tongilguk
    Well, and with whom is Britain fighting after such a statement, with ISIS or what?

    Of course with ISIS, a couple against Syria laughing

    As they say, shoulder to shoulder ...
  33. GEORGE 21 October 2015 18: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: subbtin.725
    The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue, "

    It can be seen that their tongue is stuck in the area of ​​the anus of the "elder brother" ...
  34. INF
    INF 21 October 2015 19: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The guys do not catch up, that for all sane, their actions are fawn.
  35. NKV
    NKV 21 October 2015 19: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Guys, well, this was an elementary check for lice, and the British did not pass it. I don’t think that someone at the Foreign Ministry thought that they would take and share information .. They asked the states, the British, they asked, no one wants to share, so now, who didn’t hide, we are not to blame ..
  36. Alexey RA 21 October 2015 19: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    ... we posed two questions: the first question is that the British should actively cooperate with us in terms of specifying the goals for which they should be beaten in Syria in order to destroy ISIS. Unfortunately, I received a negative answer to this. The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue

    Great!
    Now for all the protests about "do not fly there, do not bomb those"you can safely answer:"Since you knew that there were “not those” and did not tell us, it means that you are to blame for the fact that we bombed them." smile
  37. rus-5819 21 October 2015 20: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Britain refused to cooperate with the Russian Federation to provide information on the objects of the "Islamic state" in Syria,

    As they say do not add not reduce! What have the gentlemen been doing all year? Clearly, the NATO budget was mastered. (And we are all about Ukraine, about Ukraine ...)
  38. pvv113 21 October 2015 20: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue

    Anglo-Saxons do not surrender
    The Fars Iranian agency, citing a senior adviser to the Iraqi defense ministry, reports that the air defense of Iraq was shot down by two British Air Force transport personnel who dropped weapons for the terrorists of the so-called Islamic state. This is the first precedent in which there may be evidence of involvement of the Anglo-Saxon administration in the ISIS project. Earlier, the Iraqi army stated that it had repeatedly noticed the shipment of US aircraft over the territories controlled by ISIS
    http://anna-news.info/node/30577
    The news is not new, but nonetheless hi
  39. Gorjelin 21 October 2015 21: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The British said that they will not cooperate with us on this issue

    Well, let's go to ...
    none of the adequate were upset
  40. Barakuda 21 October 2015 22: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Here Zhirinovsky with the LDPR will tilt the Earth’s axis, the course will change, and the Karachun to the Great Britons wink Frozen na.h.ren. And 2 separate taps (hot.cold) will remember how to wash in the sink with the whole family in turn. am Culture ..
  41. atamankko 21 October 2015 22: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They were always against Russia, secretly envious of it.
  42. varov14 22 October 2015 03: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Whoever doubts that working for a war does not at all mean immediately substituting the delivered weapon for destruction, it should work out a little. Someone throws money down the drain. It’s just to turn this information into a weapon of counter-propaganda, as I scold myself, that I did not master a foreign language, in all likelihood there is not a plowed field or just weeds.
  43. Silman1985 22 October 2015 05: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    With a high degree of probability, I can say that the British refused to cooperate with the Russian Federation at the direction of the Americans, who are completely unprofitable for the destruction of the Islamic State, since they themselves gave birth to them and sponsor them to overthrow Assad! But now they themselves can’t curb them, and soon it’s uhhh how it goes around
  44. surrozh 22 October 2015 06: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The ears of the USA and Britain stick out from ISIS.