Two Palestinians, who attempted to kill soldiers, were shot dead in Israel

Israeli security forces shot and killed two Palestinians, who attacked with a knife at the soldiers who served in Hebron, reports RIA News message "France Press".


Two Palestinians, who attempted to kill soldiers, were shot dead in Israel


The incident occurred late last night, the military escaped with a slight wound.

“One soldier was slightly injured when two suspects approached a military post in Hebron, Israeli security forces responded by firing at them,” the country's military department said in a statement.

According to the agency, on the same day, a few hours earlier, “security forces shot and killed a Palestinian who was trying to ram a group of Israelis in a car at one of the crossroads of the West Bank.”

These cases are a continuation of "almost daily attacks in which at least nine Israelis were killed in a month, over 70 injured," the newspaper notes.

According to France Press, the current upsurge of violence claimed the lives of “more than 40 Palestinians and Israeli Arabs who attacked Jewish Israelis or participated in mass protests” in the Arab part of Jerusalem, in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Photos used:
REUTERS / Ronen Zvulun
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Oman 47 21 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    And rightly the "Palestinian Cossacks" hi Do not stand on ceremony with the Arabian stompers!
    In the East, only the language of power is generally understood.
    The desire to negotiate is the first sign of weakness.
    “Cossacks” - because they did not lose ANYTHING! wars numerically superior to the Arabs.
    1. Penetrator 21 October 2015 13: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Oman 47
      And rightly the Palestinian Cossacks do not stand on ceremony!

      What kind of Cossacks? These are some kind of crap - throwing a knife at the trunks
      1. Oman 47 21 October 2015 14: 01 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Corrected his thought - whom I think by whom.
      2. Papakiko 21 October 2015 15: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Penetrator
        throw a knife on trunks

        Again with knives on the trunks !?
        And especially:One soldier was slightly injured when two suspects approached a military post in Hebron.
        They just got closer to the post and the already slightly wounded, epic "bear disease", and then fecal stones apparently flew Israeli security forces responded by firing on them.
        From the Arabs in the media they make utter bums and moral freaks.
        Soon they will begin to write that Arabs are strangling Israeli soldiers with their bare asses and shelling tanks and territories of the state of Israel with fireballs and lightning from the same asses.
  2. Ingvar 72 21 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Not in essence. I want to ask the Jews - the uniform of the soldiers is the same, and the shoes are different. No shoe requirements?
    1. Denis DV 21 October 2015 13: 58 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      These are reservists
    2. kil 31 21 October 2015 13: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      As far as I remember euronews. Almost a month ago he said that the conflict began because of something that the Israelis closed the approach to the shrines on the Muslim holiday. I don’t even know who is to blame. request
    3. Alexander Romanov 21 October 2015 14: 01 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      I want to ask the Jews - the uniform of the soldiers is the same, and the shoes are different. No shoe requirements?

      Of course there is, but ADIDAS is the official sponsor of the Israel Defense Forces. I have to wear, advertise laughing
      1. lelikas 21 October 2015 14: 28 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Well, ours, too, ran into the mountains in them and nothing.
      2. ermak.sidorov 21 October 2015 16: 26 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        ADIDAS official sponsor of the Israel Defense Forces

        and our fighters in Georgia in 2008, then who sponsored it, the Chinese underground shoe factories ???
    4. Professor 21 October 2015 14: 46 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      the uniform of the soldiers is the same, and the shoes are different. No shoe requirements?

      Are you talking about size? Type this 41st, and that 45-?
      wink

      Shoes are different. It differs in color, weight and design. The most running boots are lightweight black (pictured at the left fighter). Red boots only in some units. The right fighters have "field" shoes.
      From the same photo report as the photo in the article.



      ]
      1. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Professor
        The right fighters have "field" shoes.

        I would bet on YAMAM
        1. MACCABI-TLV 21 October 2015 19: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Pimply
          I would bet on YAMAM

          not necessarily, in any saeret they can organizedly buy the Palladium. The fact that the fighters from Saeret is unambiguous.
          1. Pimply 21 October 2015 19: 36 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: MACCABI-TLV
            not necessarily, in any saeret they can organizedly buy the Palladium. The fact that the fighters from Saeret is unambiguous.

            I agree. But I think that reservists from Saeret. Due to age and efodov
    5. voyaka uh 21 October 2015 14: 51 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      for Ingvar 72:

      Most strange. When I served as a reservist, sneakers didn't
      were allowed. Now, apparently, yes.
      In the picture, apparently, rotation or fly at the junction of units.
      The paratrooper officer (red boots) explains to the reserve officer
      geography / situation.
      Two soldiers without helmets - that means they are not yet on a “mission”.
      1. Papakiko 21 October 2015 15: 17 New
        • -5
        • 0
        -5
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Two soldiers without helmets - that means they are not yet on a “mission”.

        Yes, you are just Holmes!
        Trunks and full BK is to understand that a person went to the blunders!
        And the bald-headed sunglasses are in the house; I am “sleeping”.
        And about multi-colored pants, apparently:

        There are blue, black and sand, who owes whom how much KU?
      2. DanG73 21 October 2015 15: 40 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        for Ingvar 72:

        Most strange. When I served as a reservist, sneakers didn't
        were allowed. Now, apparently, yes.


        These are not reservists, but the sneakers are exactly the same for everyone. The son of a friend serves in one of the special forces. He says that they bought the same new balance for the entire department. By the way, the officer’s helmet is not an ordinary helmet - these, among other things, are used by American fur seals. So it seems to me some kind of specialists.
        1. voyaka uh 21 October 2015 17: 10 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          for DanG73:
          Well, maybe. Spets.nazov appeared so much
          "good and different" that does not keep track.
          And about the helmet, you're right - I didn’t pay attention,
          some kind of wild helmet.
          1. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 43 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: voyaka uh
            some kind of wild helmet.

            American, just for specialists
        2. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 43 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: DanG73
          These are not reservists, but the sneakers are exactly the same for everyone. The son of a friend serves in one of the special forces. He says that they bought the same new balance for the entire department. By the way, the officer’s helmet is not an ordinary helmet - these, among other things, are used by American fur seals. So it seems to me some kind of specialists.

          Age too. I think either reserve specials, or Yamam
      3. Hello 21 October 2015 15: 44 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Most strange. When I served as a reservist, sneakers didn't
        were allowed. Now, apparently, yes.

        Depends on the particular unit commander, for our sneakers, the full cost of army boots was deducted from the reservist. And all of a sudden they began to come in them. The truth is allowed in mountain boots in the exercises. hi
      4. atalef 21 October 2015 15: 53 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: voyaka uh
        for Ingvar 72:

        Most strange. When I served as a reservist, sneakers didn't
        were allowed. Now, apparently, yes.
        In the picture, apparently, rotation or fly at the junction of units.
        The paratrooper officer (red boots) explains to the reserve officer
        geography / situation.
        Two soldiers without helmets - that means they are not yet on a “mission”.

        Those that are like sneakers are lightweight in some special forces
      5. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The paratrooper officer (red boots) explains to the reserve officer
        geography / situation.
        Two soldiers without helmets - that means they are not yet on a “mission”.

        I would put it on Yamam or on reservists from Matkal or something like that
        1. MACCABI-TLV 21 October 2015 19: 05 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Pimply
          I would put it on Yamam or on reservists from Matkal or something like that

          Matkalisty (miluim) can be very.
    6. atalef 21 October 2015 15: 51 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Not in essence. I want to ask the Jews - the uniform of the soldiers is the same, and the shoes are different. No shoe requirements?

      The red boots of the paratroopers, the uniform is the same for the soldiers and the generals, but the paratroopers, in addition to the warm boots, are allowed to wear a shirt out of the blue, and what parts you belong to - the difference in the color of the beret
      1. Hello 21 October 2015 15: 54 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: atalef
        but the paratroopers, in addition to the bright boots, are allowed to wear a shirt out of the blue,

        Greetings, I will add a shirt for release only on the output form. Everyone has the same field hi
        1. atalef 21 October 2015 15: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Hello
          Quote: atalef
          but the paratroopers, in addition to the bright boots, are allowed to wear a shirt out of the blue,

          Greetings, I will add a shirt for release only on the output form. Everyone has the same field hi

          Hi Ilya
          hi
      2. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        uniform uniform for soldiers and generals

        With the exception of the parade
    7. Pimply 21 October 2015 17: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      There is. If in ordinary combat units, "Kfir", "Nahal", the Bedouins and the landing are so-called "red" boots (at one time British airborne boots had such boots, and differed from ordinary ones in lightness). Then came the so-called black lungs (they are worn by Golani, Givati, MAGAV, etc.). There were still heavy tankers with steel noses. Now there are only light red and black shoes for everyone. Red means brick red.
      Specialty shoes have a separate issue.
      In the photo there is either a special force (which is unlikely due to age), or Yamam (this is possible, such as the Israeli Alpha, there are all contract soldiers, and they’ve got M-ki), or some of the special forces reservists (on ordinary reservists are not similar due to helmets and uniformity of non-standard shoes).
  3. vovanpain 21 October 2015 13: 55 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Why is it that suddenly an epidemic started at palaces such with knives to run? Previously, there were all sorts of intifada, box office shots, but here with knives, it’s not serious.
    1. corporal 21 October 2015 14: 01 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: vovanpain
      What is it that suddenly an epidemic has begun at palaces such to run with knives?

      How do epidemics begin?
      Someone threw a bacillus .... and away we go.

      Best Antibiotic - Lead Pills wink
    2. SAM 5 21 October 2015 14: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Tired, see, them specifically. That's it and ready.
      1. quote 21 October 2015 14: 50 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: SAM 5
        Tired, see, them specifically. That's it and ready.

        I’ll try to enter “information” (as the Israeli Arabs spoke of). They blocked access to the shrines and the Israelis allegedly want to destroy their Al-Aqsa mosque. In the conversation, they persistently insisted on this, no arguments to the contrary are accepted. That's after these rumors began.
        I assure you that this was the beginning.
        1. 2s1122 21 October 2015 17: 31 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          That’s for sure it’s useless talking with any nationality that was talked about on the train with one zapadenka. We told her this way and that, and examples with facts and she answered us "not your truth and even if there’s a bit of silence on your head"
        2. forumow 22 October 2015 09: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Why destroy? After all, you can neatly disassemble and assemble in another place. After all, it’s precisely its location that does not suit Jews? Yankees, I heard, so whole medieval castles were taken out of Europe.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. roskot 21 October 2015 14: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The people are getting smaller. Just some sort of bully.
  6. regdan 21 October 2015 14: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Normal household ...
  7. made13 21 October 2015 14: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Now Jews can wet anyone and declare them to be terrorists. God's chosen people are not used to ceremonies with the indigenous people - neither in biblical times, nor now.
    1. Hello 21 October 2015 15: 41 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: made13
      Now Jews can wet anyone and declare them to be terrorists.

      And what do you propose to call them? Moderate opposition?
    2. corporal 21 October 2015 16: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: made13
      Now Jews can wet anyone and declare them to be terrorists.

      Do not confuse with the USA?
      Quote: made13
      not used to stand on ceremony

      Humanism on BV is a sign of weakness, while the weak are destroyed.
      Quote: made13
      with indigenous people

      Indians? belay wassat wassat
  8. Professor 21 October 2015 14: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: made13
    Now Jews can wet anyone and declare them to be terrorists. God's chosen people are not used to ceremonies with the indigenous people - neither in biblical times, nor now.

    They wouldn’t stand on ceremony, wouldn’t send them to meet with the prophet for 60 years many times less than Russia in just a year. According to their information, only about 2000 children died in the last war in Gaza during the bombing of places with one of the largest population density in the world.
    1. Mikhail Krapivin 21 October 2015 16: 13 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      [/ quote] only about 2000 children died, and this was due to the bombing of places with one of the largest population densities in the world [/ quote]

      With about the same intonation, the Germans said - a thousand more Jews, a thousand less who consider these Jews ...
      1. Professor 21 October 2015 19: 29 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        With about the same intonation, the Germans said - a thousand more Jews, a thousand less who consider these Jews ...

        You first count how many you have sent to the other world, and only then criticize others.
  9. chunga-changa 21 October 2015 16: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This is how it all really happens.
    -http: //sokol-ff.livejournal.com/1111265.html
  10. ermak.sidorov 21 October 2015 16: 21 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    That’s why I respect the Jews, because they often “shoot at the beginning and then think” or simply “shoot” without bothering to spend time “thinking” ... as the harsh practice of living in most cases it is the right choice ...
  11. 2s1122 21 October 2015 17: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    Not in essence. I want to ask the Jews - the uniform of the soldiers is the same, and the shoes are different. No shoe requirements?

    You didn’t see our airborne assault or reconnaissance battalion in Afghanistan, you know, it’s convenient to go and walk, because your legs are not iron. As I understand it, this special unit may be what.